Added: 1 year ago
From: ColdWarWarriors
Views: 20,443
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • huh, fromhe 1st SS panzer devision correct?

  • The only way for a Sherman to kill a Tiger was to hit the side or the back....may happened that way

  • Its paint

    Ooops *dives down in the tank*

  • Oddball is the man!

  • Is that the same T(-34)iger from Saving Private Ryan? Looks like it.

  • @happosai27 who knows ;d

  • @happosai27 it was made​for the movie "The Battle Of Neretva"

  • 1:13 I seriously said "there ya go," out loud.

  • Great job converting those T-34/85s to look like Tigers. Recently, I saw a Tiger I, and a Jagdpanther being driven around, on YouTube. The Jagdpanther fired its 88mm gun. Quite impressive. These were the REAL vehicles, too, not conversions.

  • There is only 1 way to kill a tiger with a sherman ... shoot in the back

  • @DarkMessi1 Not really. The 80mm thick sides were thinner than the 80mm thick rear since the rear was sloped. Makes for good movies though.

    And Oddball doenst have the 75mm L/40. He has the upgraded Sherman with the high velocity 76mm gun. With that, he can puncture the Tigers front plate from about 300 yards. But hey, it's a movie.

  • THATS PAINT!!!!!

  • Oddball was my favourite character

  • one of th best movies ever.

  • When I watch Kelly's Hero's am I watching a war movie ? Then it turns into a comedy. then back to a war movie. Then it's part western near the end. This movie should get a nobel prize !! No other movie I have ever seen has this great turn of tides.

  • oddball you crazy bastard...

  • How fool the Tiger's commander was, all he has to do was reverse the Tiger a little bit, then the mighty 88 could turn backward and hit the Sherman in a blink.

  • That Tiger was trapped. Of course it was a easy prey. Also the armor on the back of the Tiger is weak. As with any tank. But I am quite shocked of the quality of the engineering the Germans came up with when it comes to their armoured divisions. They made TIgers from recycled tanks hence the German empire was tight on resources. I can't imagine what whould happen if the Germans had the same amount of resources as the allies during WW2. <.<

  • @atatyrknumber1 They would spend it all on experimental shit. They loved to experiment

  • @EasyStations Yeah, Germans made V2 rockets. Germans had smart bombs in the end of the war. Nightvision on some panther tanks. They had the first jet-fighters which led to the Russian MIG-series. (When Germany lost, the plans and technological research was splitted to different allied countries.) And also that's where the Americans got the idea of stealth technology from. Germans truly had the technology on their side but not the resources

  • @atatyrknumber1 Yeah, but when you consider how many of their ideas were just batshit insane and unfit for real warfare (triflugel, He-162, their almost arcane approach to nuclear research, the Maus tank, the "Natter" rocket that fired wait for it... rockets etc), they're bound to come up with a few good ones as well. Even a broken clock's right twice a day. :D

  • @atatyrknumber1

    Everyone's treating the Tiger like a tank-demigod when in reality its design had quite a few faults: the frontal armor was not sloped like the King Tiger's, the tracks had to be taken off to make the Tiger narrow enough for transportation via train, and we haven't even mentioned that it loved to randomly break down: almost all Tiger columns arrived to their destination with a few tanks lost and abandoned due to mechanical malfunctions. The Tiger was strong but unreliable.

  • @amitakartok it a=was demi god enough

  • @amitakartok Except the fact only 1300 were made, the kill ratio per Tiger was nearly 6 tanks per tiger lost, considering repairs. If used correctly many Tiger aces recorded upwards of 100 kills in their careers.

    The sloped armour was only something the T-34 inspired the Germans to use, reflected in the Panther, a much more versatile and cheaper tank. Its true it was overengineered and expensive to produce, but there is little question to its effective nature, both tactically and psychologically

  • And as for the Sherman vs Tiger comments......that would be the case for M4's mounting the 75 and 76mm guns, however the later 76mm HV and 17pounder would tear holes in the Tiger from any angle.

  • thats not a tiger 1 track it looks russian

  • @LtJim007 There's like only one working Tiger in the world right now, in movies they always take another tank and make it look like a Tiger.

  • If that was and equal oppurtunity for each tank, Tiger would rip that sherman apart

  • @Povilas7 Everybody knows the tiger would rip the sherman apart, Thats why the americans played it tactically and hit the famous tiger from behind.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more