Its about keeping the gov't in check. When corrupted, we take action. That's the reason behind the ban, so big brother can seize control a little easier.
I assume the "second amenders" out there would support the right of every American to have their own nuclear weapon, tank, bazooka, machine gun, etc. Nu?
@Tephladon So you're saying one can be brave without a gun - I agree. I misundersood your point. I thought you were being more rhetorical in the sense of "I am so tough I don't need a gun" - which you agree is BS. Re: #84, yours is the fallacy of the "single cause". Not taking the bait - sorry. Not sure what your last stmt adds to what we already know. Ultimately, I agree with Nugent. If there was no document, would you not have a right to decide what means you use to defend yourself?
Websters has more than one def for "regulated". Well-regulated when the 2A was written meant "well-trained". To think otherwise means that we accept that the 2A was there to empower gvmt. That was not the BOR's purpose. The "militia" were the colonists. To assume it means "gvmt soldiers" is tantamount to the Founders wishing the Redcoats had arms. If gun advocates ignore the first part of the 2A its because it just SUPPORTS not contradicts, the second part of the amendment
What does bravery have to do with carrying a gun for protection? You can be brave all you want without a gun, but what is the use of being brave if you are going to lose? Do you think most criminals AND THEIR BUDDIES expect to lose when they pick their victims? You expecting a fair fight?
@tolbiny66 What does ownership have to do with anything? People in this country don't have to own a tank/bazooka to kill people with these already. Worse still, they can do so at the command of one individual with all the arbitrary morality that comes with. These are soldiers, people just the same. So what difference would it make if citizens did? Do gvmt employees (soldiers) have a superior moral compass than all other non gvmt employees? I don't think so.
@tolbiny66 I read in your comment that you thought it would be inherently bad for citizens to own tanks and bazookas. My point is that I disagree because such a statement arbitrarily imputes a nefarious motive to such ownership whereas none is proven. e.g., if it were legal and your neighbor came home with a tank, wouldn't your first reaction be more in the nature of amusement rather than fear?
@tolbiny66 I look at your Q 2 ways: One, I think it would be quite impossible for everyone to own their own given it takes entire nations with all their resources decades to get there. Practicality aside, if you mean can anyone "keep and bear" (under 2A) a nuclear weapon, I would think unless you can carry one probably not, but then again, the Founders probably had no idea of WMDs.
It would not be worse. It is inequality of power that makes for violence. If we were all equally powerful we might live in a safer world. I am all for downsizing nuclear weapons so everyone can carrry one.
@tolbiny66 I enjoyed your post. Hope you read all 3 of my resps to your Q. By the time technology got to the point that we all had one, I imagine they would not be all that useful. Technology would have developed an antidote. I imagine, an energy offset that would make the point of having one moot - I am thinking of a surge surpressor for nuclear bombs - wouldn't that be fun!
@tolbiny66 Text limit got me. My own "natural rights" test, notwithstanding 2A, is generally that as long as one person can victimize another person with any weapon, then that potential victim has the right to have the same weapon his victimizer has. With nuclear weapons I think the players are not individuals but countries.
@tolbiny66 Continuing...Since 2A folks believe at the core of the 2A is the natural right of self defense, it would be hard to believe an individual could make an argument that triggering a nuclear weapon could ever be in self defense. That right only extends against the aggressor. Also, "self defense" also implies you are alive after you defend yourself.
@Tephladon "Well Regulated Militia" WNH? The 2nd amendment is there to protect you and me from our government. Not the other way around. If you do not like guns, do not own one. I myself own several. And I am in the Process of getting my Carry permit.
If you want to be a baby cowering when someone else comes in with a weapon to take from you. Or God forbid, Take you child or Spouse. Be my guess.
there probably wasnt much crime in the early days. on all the old westerns, the outlaw rode up on his horse, and said "please" to the lady holding the 10 ga. shotgun, "can me and my horse have a drink o' water, maam? ill gladly paint your house for a home cooked meal" theres a lot to be said for being polite and respectful. nobody OWES anybody ANYTHING.
Feinstein and Boxer and Barack are traitors, fight to keep your guns, Militia is needed to restore the Constitution. The elites will start ww3, it's time Americans stand up to their corrupt gov., outsourcing our jobs, ignoring Americans with no health care, and stealing their tax dollars.
"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful
masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."-- Abraham Lincoln
to feinstein n boxer... i will never give up my guns...
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
I am from the UK and i can tell any American to - look at our laws and how we are ALLOWED to defend ourselves.
I do accept their are limits to defending ones self however, this should be in the hands of the people and not the government.
Every life has value and that lieft has the right (by cultural and human rights) to defend them-self how they see fit (within reason of a self-defence action).
Fight to keep guns in the hands of the people or your children will grow up in your failure to act.
I am from the UK and i can tell any American to - look at our laws and how we are ALLOWED to defend ourselves.
I do accept their are limits to defending ones self however, this should be in the hands of the people and not the government.
Every life has value and that lieft has the right (by cultural and human rights) to defend them-self how they see fit (within reason of a self-defence action).
Fight to keep guns in the hands of the people or your children will grow up in your failure to act.
I dig Ted and agree with much he says...one thing though...he needs to re-think his love for law enforcement and for the military. They are both, the long arm of the government. Please anyone...name one corrupt/tyrannical government that disarmed and subjugated it's citizens without the direct and complicit cooperation of both entities!!!???
They are both out of control...heavy handed cops, violating citizens rights and our military is fighting an illegal,immoral,un-Constitutional war! Get it?
Ted makes sense. Common sense and logic is evaporating in America. Critical thinking is waneing quickly. People seem to want to be told what to think. They have given their brains to tell-a-vision! Unfortunate as their ignorance will lead to their demise. Trillions of printing press money with NO way to back it's value ? The powers that be show us that critical thinking is unnecessary so it is quite easy for Americans to live delluded .
Ted does make sense, but he has to be careful in how he communicates his point of view so that it doesn't later become a distorted sound bite by mischief-makers to brain dead sheeple.
There is a time coming...very soon indeed...that the sleeping masses are going to get one hell of a rude awakening!
Our government has been screwing us for many years and we are to blame, because of our own ignorance and stupidity. We let them steal our money and spend it on all sorts of idiotic schemes. We let them tell us that it's bad to defend ourselves and anyone who has the tools is psychotic. We let them in our homes with tons of shit on TV and sports to keep us occupied. It's will end.
Absolutely correct. The time is coming and the big wake up call will startle the masses. Perhaps watching celebrities or sports will take a back seat to " SURVIVAL ". We shall see ...
Thanks Samuri ~ we can only hope because of the intranet is making truths more available. The mainstream media IS owned and the corporate owners TELL them what they can and cannot say. It's so simple to comprehend actually. You gotta do what your boss wants or no job. That leaves tainted only information available by mainstream. It's not difficult to understand. The intranet is part of the survival movement . It allows many points of view to be heard. THIS is what America SHOULD demand. .
If seems you're the brain dead sheeple repeating slander and lies. Find us a source, other than the sheeple baying a mantra of a lies, that proves Ted a kiddie diddler? Tell us what age the "supposed" kid was "diddled" by providing a reputable source.
So you don't believe Ted's point that people have a self-evident right to protect themselves as they see fit. I think his point that it's not the business of mischief makers followed by the good intentions of brain dead sheeple how to defend.
i like ted nugent and i really like what he said here. there are things that he has done in his past that i don't agree with but i don't know how i would have acted in those situations either. he is a staunch defender of the second amendment and i agree with that.
Freedom of Speech, "Right to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" go Ted, I am so sick of all the permits, the number of government employees who do not do their job, get paid, sit on their ass all day, for what?
This drivel comes from a man who adopted a 15 year old girl and lived with her as his wife? How does this nutcase always get so much airtime? The answer is that nutcases are intriguing and a spectacle to the public.
You have a problem with something he said in this 3 minute clip? Care to comment on that? Or no, you probably wouldn't. You'd rather just call him a nutcase and recount his past to discredit everything true and honest he just said. Call the man names, but some of the issues he raises does embody and represent the views of law abiding, hard working, intelligent citizens.
If the nutcase produces "drivel", then what is a man or woman that produces "half-truths"? Don't they call them professional liars, lawyers, your average politician or brain dead sheeple?
Why don't you try to source your quote because it seems your facts are half-truths? Did you do this as a mischief maker or a brain dead sheeple?
What was Ted's point you don't want anyone to think about? Ah yes. People have a self-evident right to protect themselves before there was any written law.
ifreemantoo: I don't disagree with his point just the way he goes about expressing himself. He is not the spokesman you want to advocate for the Second Amendment. To further a position a person has to appeal to those in the middle and those who can be swayed from the other side of the issue. Nugent is an extremist who only appeals to fervent advocates of his position and alienates those people you need to build a majority.
I don't have a gun but we need citizens to have guns to protect our liberty, to prevent from the government from running over us. There may get to be a time when we have to literally fight for our liberty. What a mess this country is.
Well put...get the training you need and get armed. Our government is watching and the more trained, heavily armed citizens we have...the better. Our government needs to take notice that many of us are tired of the crap that they continually do in our name.
We are tired of it and are close to a violent uprising. As bad as we think things are..I am sure that they are 1000 times worse. It's better to be ready...and not be swept up by circumstances.
The Nuge is right as usual. We just had another 3 day gun show in Indianapolis packed with people buying guns and tons of ammo. Every show for the last year or so has gained attendance, it is held 4 times a year. I struck up a conversation with a few different folks and the general consensus is that they are getting ready for the STHTF. Many people are locked cocked and ready to rock doc.
Well said by ol Woodrow. Just wish he had not sold our country to the federal reserve and handed over control of the money supply to a group of elite bankers. But eh...If it wasn't Woody who had done it, I'm sure another prez would of at some point.
@TAZ4169 You would bitch slap...
VeyronBD 2 weeks ago
"I don't like repeat offenders, i like DEAD offenders"
kicknbazz1615 1 month ago
Ted nugent is gay.
VeyronBD 9 months ago
A Nation without GUN is a Slave nation. If Iranian people had gun's then we wouldnt have all this trouble that we have today....!!!?
BishiSab 1 year ago
Its about keeping the gov't in check. When corrupted, we take action. That's the reason behind the ban, so big brother can seize control a little easier.
drlovebutton 1 year ago
thats how we roll in michigan baby
aztecboxer69 1 year ago
Guns=Freedom Period.
kimberman8 1 year ago
without guns people have no freedom
TheAlexagius 1 year ago
I assume the "second amenders" out there would support the right of every American to have their own nuclear weapon, tank, bazooka, machine gun, etc. Nu?
tolbiny66 1 year ago
@Tephladon So you're saying one can be brave without a gun - I agree. I misundersood your point. I thought you were being more rhetorical in the sense of "I am so tough I don't need a gun" - which you agree is BS. Re: #84, yours is the fallacy of the "single cause". Not taking the bait - sorry. Not sure what your last stmt adds to what we already know. Ultimately, I agree with Nugent. If there was no document, would you not have a right to decide what means you use to defend yourself?
911isbusy 1 year ago
Websters has more than one def for "regulated". Well-regulated when the 2A was written meant "well-trained". To think otherwise means that we accept that the 2A was there to empower gvmt. That was not the BOR's purpose. The "militia" were the colonists. To assume it means "gvmt soldiers" is tantamount to the Founders wishing the Redcoats had arms. If gun advocates ignore the first part of the 2A its because it just SUPPORTS not contradicts, the second part of the amendment
911isbusy 1 year ago
What does bravery have to do with carrying a gun for protection? You can be brave all you want without a gun, but what is the use of being brave if you are going to lose? Do you think most criminals AND THEIR BUDDIES expect to lose when they pick their victims? You expecting a fair fight?
911isbusy 1 year ago
This guy doesn't understand the second amendment. Hey Ted, can I own a tank or a bazooka? Ted is a nut case. Yes, Ted you are wierd.
tolbiny66 1 year ago
@tolbiny66 What does ownership have to do with anything? People in this country don't have to own a tank/bazooka to kill people with these already. Worse still, they can do so at the command of one individual with all the arbitrary morality that comes with. These are soldiers, people just the same. So what difference would it make if citizens did? Do gvmt employees (soldiers) have a superior moral compass than all other non gvmt employees? I don't think so.
911isbusy 1 year ago
@911isbusy
I don't understand your post.
tolbiny66 1 year ago
@tolbiny66 I read in your comment that you thought it would be inherently bad for citizens to own tanks and bazookas. My point is that I disagree because such a statement arbitrarily imputes a nefarious motive to such ownership whereas none is proven. e.g., if it were legal and your neighbor came home with a tank, wouldn't your first reaction be more in the nature of amusement rather than fear?
911isbusy 1 year ago
@911isbusy
I never said it was bad to own a tank or bazooka. I think everyone should own their nuclear weapon.
tolbiny66 1 year ago
@tolbiny66 Would it be worse than who can use them now?
911isbusy 1 year ago
@911isbusy
I'll answer your question if you answer mine. Can everyone own their own nuclear weapon?
tolbiny66 1 year ago
@tolbiny66 I look at your Q 2 ways: One, I think it would be quite impossible for everyone to own their own given it takes entire nations with all their resources decades to get there. Practicality aside, if you mean can anyone "keep and bear" (under 2A) a nuclear weapon, I would think unless you can carry one probably not, but then again, the Founders probably had no idea of WMDs.
911isbusy 1 year ago
@911isbusy
It would not be worse. It is inequality of power that makes for violence. If we were all equally powerful we might live in a safer world. I am all for downsizing nuclear weapons so everyone can carrry one.
tolbiny66 1 year ago
@tolbiny66 I enjoyed your post. Hope you read all 3 of my resps to your Q. By the time technology got to the point that we all had one, I imagine they would not be all that useful. Technology would have developed an antidote. I imagine, an energy offset that would make the point of having one moot - I am thinking of a surge surpressor for nuclear bombs - wouldn't that be fun!
911isbusy 1 year ago
@911isbusy
Yep. Read all 3. I appreciate your civility.
tolbiny66 1 year ago
@tolbiny66 Text limit got me. My own "natural rights" test, notwithstanding 2A, is generally that as long as one person can victimize another person with any weapon, then that potential victim has the right to have the same weapon his victimizer has. With nuclear weapons I think the players are not individuals but countries.
911isbusy 1 year ago
@tolbiny66 Continuing...Since 2A folks believe at the core of the 2A is the natural right of self defense, it would be hard to believe an individual could make an argument that triggering a nuclear weapon could ever be in self defense. That right only extends against the aggressor. Also, "self defense" also implies you are alive after you defend yourself.
911isbusy 1 year ago
@Tephladon "Well Regulated Militia" WNH? The 2nd amendment is there to protect you and me from our government. Not the other way around. If you do not like guns, do not own one. I myself own several. And I am in the Process of getting my Carry permit.
If you want to be a baby cowering when someone else comes in with a weapon to take from you. Or God forbid, Take you child or Spouse. Be my guess.
bookittysdad 1 year ago
there probably wasnt much crime in the early days. on all the old westerns, the outlaw rode up on his horse, and said "please" to the lady holding the 10 ga. shotgun, "can me and my horse have a drink o' water, maam? ill gladly paint your house for a home cooked meal" theres a lot to be said for being polite and respectful. nobody OWES anybody ANYTHING.
personal accountability.
get a job.
and spank your children, if they need it.
edslides 2 years ago
Do the simple math people. Liberty=Self Ownership.
1x8twist 2 years ago
Wrong, MrDope (good name for ya). However it is brought up, its about freedom to defend yourself against criminals or tyranny. The bottom line.
BIGSKYHAL50 2 years ago
go Ted go......
BIGSKYHAL50 2 years ago
I have never heard something this true in my entire life!
MrDopeMan333 2 years ago
I support Ted on this issue 150%
But, this knucklehead also is a warmongering RINO neo-con
DoctorJohnJGibbons 2 years ago
Comment removed
IowaMartialArts 2 years ago
Comment removed
IowaMartialArts 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He's a moron
coolioto 2 years ago
Ted Nugent
Amen!
WilliamHBonney55 2 years ago
People should consider that once the
2nd Amendment is gone then it becomes much easier to abolish First Amendment.
Kriegbell 2 years ago 2
Awesome video! I will not ever EVER follow a law that restricts my 2nd amendment right that is written in plain english for ANYONE to see...
The states that have already started clamping down you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Oh and fyi criminals dont follow laws BY DEFINITION so why would they follow this one?
You are left with law abiding citizens who cant defend themselves meanwhile the criminals have all the guns... SMART!
FYI guns arent hard to make.
THESERF1 2 years ago
Nuge, AMEN. You are so f***ing right.
RaccoonAvatar 2 years ago
Ted Nugent must be so weird, to have such good reasoning!
Hell yeah!
Whatrebel 2 years ago 4
Feinstein and Boxer and Barack are traitors, fight to keep your guns, Militia is needed to restore the Constitution. The elites will start ww3, it's time Americans stand up to their corrupt gov., outsourcing our jobs, ignoring Americans with no health care, and stealing their tax dollars.
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago 2
"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful
masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."-- Abraham Lincoln
to feinstein n boxer... i will never give up my guns...
california resident..... ready for when tshtf
militantrebell 2 years ago 4
im from cali too.. good to know theres sensible people out here
svkm1991 2 years ago
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
militantrebell 2 years ago
"For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security" Thomas Jefferson
militantrebell 2 years ago 3
I am from the UK and i can tell any American to - look at our laws and how we are ALLOWED to defend ourselves.
I do accept their are limits to defending ones self however, this should be in the hands of the people and not the government.
Every life has value and that lieft has the right (by cultural and human rights) to defend them-self how they see fit (within reason of a self-defence action).
Fight to keep guns in the hands of the people or your children will grow up in your failure to act.
fearofwraith 2 years ago
I am from the UK and i can tell any American to - look at our laws and how we are ALLOWED to defend ourselves.
I do accept their are limits to defending ones self however, this should be in the hands of the people and not the government.
Every life has value and that lieft has the right (by cultural and human rights) to defend them-self how they see fit (within reason of a self-defence action).
Fight to keep guns in the hands of the people or your children will grow up in your failure to act.
fearofwraith 2 years ago
I dig Ted and agree with much he says...one thing though...he needs to re-think his love for law enforcement and for the military. They are both, the long arm of the government. Please anyone...name one corrupt/tyrannical government that disarmed and subjugated it's citizens without the direct and complicit cooperation of both entities!!!???
They are both out of control...heavy handed cops, violating citizens rights and our military is fighting an illegal,immoral,un-Constitutional war! Get it?
countrysamurai 2 years ago
Those who are discerning will take the truths and the dumbest among us ..well you can't count on critical thinking in that arena anyway.
RenegadeTimes 2 years ago
Ted makes sense. Common sense and logic is evaporating in America. Critical thinking is waneing quickly. People seem to want to be told what to think. They have given their brains to tell-a-vision! Unfortunate as their ignorance will lead to their demise. Trillions of printing press money with NO way to back it's value ? The powers that be show us that critical thinking is unnecessary so it is quite easy for Americans to live delluded .
Bring back COMMON SENSE !!!
RenegadeTimes 2 years ago 7
Ted does make sense, but he has to be careful in how he communicates his point of view so that it doesn't later become a distorted sound bite by mischief-makers to brain dead sheeple.
ifreemantoo 2 years ago
There is a time coming...very soon indeed...that the sleeping masses are going to get one hell of a rude awakening!
Our government has been screwing us for many years and we are to blame, because of our own ignorance and stupidity. We let them steal our money and spend it on all sorts of idiotic schemes. We let them tell us that it's bad to defend ourselves and anyone who has the tools is psychotic. We let them in our homes with tons of shit on TV and sports to keep us occupied. It's will end.
countrysamurai 2 years ago
Absolutely correct. The time is coming and the big wake up call will startle the masses. Perhaps watching celebrities or sports will take a back seat to " SURVIVAL ". We shall see ...
RenegadeTimes 2 years ago
Maybe..."Survival" will become the newest buzz word in our daily lives and language?
It's good to meet another critical thinker.
countrysamurai 2 years ago
Thanks Samuri ~ we can only hope because of the intranet is making truths more available. The mainstream media IS owned and the corporate owners TELL them what they can and cannot say. It's so simple to comprehend actually. You gotta do what your boss wants or no job. That leaves tainted only information available by mainstream. It's not difficult to understand. The intranet is part of the survival movement . It allows many points of view to be heard. THIS is what America SHOULD demand. .
RenegadeTimes 2 years ago
great video, too bad it's low quality.
1995firefly4dr 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ted, the Neo-con's favorite draft dodger and kiddie diddler.
sgtsnafu 2 years ago
If seems you're the brain dead sheeple repeating slander and lies. Find us a source, other than the sheeple baying a mantra of a lies, that proves Ted a kiddie diddler? Tell us what age the "supposed" kid was "diddled" by providing a reputable source.
So you don't believe Ted's point that people have a self-evident right to protect themselves as they see fit. I think his point that it's not the business of mischief makers followed by the good intentions of brain dead sheeple how to defend.
ifreemantoo 2 years ago
i like ted nugent and i really like what he said here. there are things that he has done in his past that i don't agree with but i don't know how i would have acted in those situations either. he is a staunch defender of the second amendment and i agree with that.
stshell 2 years ago
Let's not mince words, here, Ted :-)
charlessmyth 2 years ago 2
that was so dam good ... lol... Ted's the shit!
... like dead .... offenders... oh surely Im crazy right?
dax313xab 2 years ago 5
Freedom of Speech, "Right to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" go Ted, I am so sick of all the permits, the number of government employees who do not do their job, get paid, sit on their ass all day, for what?
WELCOME2TROTSKY 2 years ago 11
This drivel comes from a man who adopted a 15 year old girl and lived with her as his wife? How does this nutcase always get so much airtime? The answer is that nutcases are intriguing and a spectacle to the public.
klard 2 years ago
You have a problem with something he said in this 3 minute clip? Care to comment on that? Or no, you probably wouldn't. You'd rather just call him a nutcase and recount his past to discredit everything true and honest he just said. Call the man names, but some of the issues he raises does embody and represent the views of law abiding, hard working, intelligent citizens.
chatadamsbros 2 years ago 3
If the nutcase produces "drivel", then what is a man or woman that produces "half-truths"? Don't they call them professional liars, lawyers, your average politician or brain dead sheeple?
Why don't you try to source your quote because it seems your facts are half-truths? Did you do this as a mischief maker or a brain dead sheeple?
What was Ted's point you don't want anyone to think about? Ah yes. People have a self-evident right to protect themselves before there was any written law.
ifreemantoo 2 years ago
ifreemantoo: I don't disagree with his point just the way he goes about expressing himself. He is not the spokesman you want to advocate for the Second Amendment. To further a position a person has to appeal to those in the middle and those who can be swayed from the other side of the issue. Nugent is an extremist who only appeals to fervent advocates of his position and alienates those people you need to build a majority.
klard 2 years ago
Actually I already wrote what you just wrote. I didn't have to keep a half-truth going to make the same point.
A half-truh is still a lie and disparaging a man's character based on a half-truth to make a point is still slander.
ifreemantoo 2 years ago
Ventura/The Nuge 2012!
CRAPCANNONS 2 years ago
Thats Right!
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 2 years ago
Every time governments have "dis-armed" citizens, genocide has followed.
Look at the UK , crimes up 40% since they disarmed the people.
boots920 2 years ago 14
@boots920 All gun owners should be killed.
TheDrLighthouse 1 year ago
I don't have a gun but we need citizens to have guns to protect our liberty, to prevent from the government from running over us. There may get to be a time when we have to literally fight for our liberty. What a mess this country is.
Elizruth 2 years ago 8
Well put...get the training you need and get armed. Our government is watching and the more trained, heavily armed citizens we have...the better. Our government needs to take notice that many of us are tired of the crap that they continually do in our name.
We are tired of it and are close to a violent uprising. As bad as we think things are..I am sure that they are 1000 times worse. It's better to be ready...and not be swept up by circumstances.
countrysamurai 2 years ago
The Nuge is right as usual. We just had another 3 day gun show in Indianapolis packed with people buying guns and tons of ammo. Every show for the last year or so has gained attendance, it is held 4 times a year. I struck up a conversation with a few different folks and the general consensus is that they are getting ready for the STHTF. Many people are locked cocked and ready to rock doc.
curtcoffee 2 years ago 8
wow = this guy has spoken the truth!
No limitations on our rights.
SafeArmsReview 2 years ago 6
America, WAKE THE FUCK UP AND TAKE BACK YOUR COUNTRY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!
Hendo1974 2 years ago 7
I believe its too late, gold's hitting $1000 US.
Without a money system the country is toast. (How do you pay for imports of commodities like oil) ?
How many people are awake, less than 5%. Its either kick ass now or foget about it. The troops need to come home right fckin now.
boots920 2 years ago
Amen.
tripit88 2 years ago
I Dissagree !!!
We shouldn't even have to have a Permit :)
It's our right, fuck the permit.
WulfBand 2 years ago 15
AMEN!
Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of liberty is a history of resistance.
• Woodrow Wilson
shoeman3434 2 years ago 8
Well said by ol Woodrow. Just wish he had not sold our country to the federal reserve and handed over control of the money supply to a group of elite bankers. But eh...If it wasn't Woody who had done it, I'm sure another prez would of at some point.
chatadamsbros 2 years ago