Added: 1 year ago
From: NathaCardona
Views: 120,401
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Damned GOOD

  • keith!

  • DAMN!!!!

  • Subtitles, man? Okay. I can dig.

    The Dude Abides.

  • pismo...obvladajo u nulo..ahhaha

  • This concert must rate as one of the best of all time....period.........wish i had been there

  • RollingOrmond And Belli did a role in the original Star Trek! Guy got around!

  • Mel Belli, legendary San Fran lawyer at 6:57

  • I enjoy the Rolling Stones music, but I came here for a documentary not a concert. That's why I disliked it, no hate intended. I had to say this so some kid wouldn't go "first dislike must be from (insert person)

  • @29pvp

    then you came on your own mistake not the uploader, so dislike yourself, lol jk jk

  • Sounds like they experimented playing guitars through Solid-State Ampeg amplifiers here briefly. Sounds "THIN". They bring the Tubed Marshalls & Fenders back rather quickly...

  • Hell yes.

  • MICK TAYLOR RULZ!

  • 6:40 look at those glasses! It looks like someone drew them on the dude's face with a magic marker.

  • Some industrious soul once when though Stones concert footage and added up all the distances he moved around the stage during a show. They say he runs an average of five miles during a two hour show.

  • Sweet guitar fills by the most underrated blues guitarist and the most talented Stones guitarist, Mick Taylor.

  • i love this version of satisfaction...especially the guitar fills replacing the drum ones in the chorus

  • hmmm not exactly the beatles are they

  • @astroboirap And thank god for THAT! VIVE LA DIFFERANCE

  • @AlabasterDog i think they're one of the most overated bands of all time

  • Mick sounds like Nigel Tufnel lol

  • @santanaincubus Ha! That is a perfect description!

  • @Kalooookalay lol

  • @santanaincubus "My solos are my trademark".

  • @ToddSweeneyOnce lol. Nigel and Mick should do a duet one day lol

  • @santanaincubus What song should they do?

  • @ToddSweeneyOnce Lick my Lovepup lol

  • @santanaincubus It's a "Mach" piece! Lol!

  • @santanaincubus Make sure it's recorded in "Dubly" lol!

  • But this is 1969 !

  • Most cameramen recording live performances are like little girls, never focusing on what is really interesting, the musicians who are actually playing the solos.

  • @paititi ye're sadly quite right!

    Look at the CHuck Berry's gig from 1968 in London, they just are lame cameramen, those here are at least better

  • Live With Me sounds better live is what I mean't.

  • Some studio recordings they made were usually too fast compared to live. Live With Me sounds better to live. Street Fighting Man, Honky Tonk Women, Jumpin' Jack Flash, Midnight Rambler all sound better live in '69/'70, in my opinion. It is preference of course, but I like their live sound better and the playing. When Keith would sing, it was the best overall sound. Later on, they sped up their live songs and had more members in the band. That is a tempo and sound I don't prefer.

  • Comment removed

  • charlie watts looks like an ancient indian chief -- what a beautiful guy

  • NEW YORK HOW ARE YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!? :D

  • one of the best musical documentaries ever. thanks for posting.

  • What a puny guitar sound on that satisfaction riff ... lol

  • @clickswitchh YEAH RIGHT??? Keith with that POS Lucite guitar... Should had his Tele. Love when Taylor comes in on that SG... @ 1:10. Love how Keef is always in Charlie's face... Meanwhile Wyman looks like he's board out of his head... lol

  • was that Mel Belli something in this movie or what?

  • «...cool KIDS never, never Die.»

    (Smsh Ppkins)

  • i was a schoolboy in irl////great show/ angles were brutal in their methods...some of the stones best stuff

  • MUCHAS GRACIAS POR ESE IMPRESCINDIBLE DOCUMENTAL QUE JA NO ESTA' A LA VENDA

  • Legendary band but what a mess, musically speaking.

  • @gcoudert You must be joking, mate.

  • Well, maybe my statement was too strongly worded. I accept that they've sold millions of records wordwide, they've written great songs and I'm certainly not judging anybody who likes them but I find their recordings 'untight' (for want of a better word) in terms of timing/dynamics/tone and I'm not mad about Jagger's singing; not his voice but his singing. In a live context, fine, but I would have preferred their studio sound to be more polished. Question of taste, I guess! Still a great band.

  • @gcoudert I personally love the raw untight sound, but I understand completely what you are saying. As you said it's a matter of personal taste.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more