I'm a Flyer's and agree with both sides, leaning on the side of inconclusive evidence. Not that it matters anyway, it didn't change the outcome of the game like Kovalev's bullshit goal in the second round. However, I think if it was called a goal on the ice it wouldn't have been overturned either.
An i do think there was a chance that it was in, but since it was called no goal on the ice there has to be conclusive video to overturn it, physics and common sense don't have any say in it. this was the only part in this game where the refs didn't completely screw the Flyers Over. If you pittsburg fans want to win by cheating go ahead, but you never truely earned it.
See you have a legit team to root for. If it comes down to Pens vs. Wings, go Wings. They've been fricken freight train this whole season. I'm a Philly person though.
Flyers are definitely a bunch of bitches. When Crosby had a slight scrum with Richards at the end of game four, him and richards grabbed each other and Jason Smith comes from behind and pops Crosby in the back of the head. What a pussy move that was. Everyone knows when two guys are fighting, it's one on one, not two on one.
how about this, every time the pens lose a game in the playoffs (before the wings at least) they have a big fit, and fight for little or no reason. They fight because their upset a team beat them? idiots. btw I'm a Wings fan! And we won the cup! BITCH!
but since they called no goal at first they had to review it
and there were no clear camera angles of white ice in between the puck and the red line, although you could clearly see that it was in the goal.
it would be like watching the video of a murder, and seeing somebody point a gun to the head of somebody else, but then something goes in front of the camera and the next thing you see is a dead person
They should use common sense and basic physics.. It was a goald. That puck didn't stretch two inches after it went under the glove and not cross the line. Fortunately the Pens overpowered the Flyers and it worked out. The NHL needs much better and more camera angles near the goal.
i think everyone can agree that was a goal, the only thing is the officials weren't 100 percent positive that it was a goal so it was ruled a no goal. Stupid I know but hey like Crosby needed another goal in the playoffs :P
goal check the angle at 0:42 you have to pause it properly it will show the entire puck
mushkyman123 3 days ago
lol 0:27 the announcer WHOOP
MarioCentral123 1 year ago
goal
999sargent 1 year ago
goal , big flyer fan admit but oh well shittsburg got away with a lot
simongagne33 1 year ago
Clearly a goal, no doubt. And i'm a Red Wings fan.
QuistopherWalkin 1 year ago
lol pause at 1:40, its clearly a goal
Edy5656 2 years ago
goal
Viperdude20 2 years ago
no goal there was a little picece of the puck on the red line
BoandLuke92 2 years ago
No GOAL!!!!!!!!!!
1pooper9 2 years ago
GOAL!!! and by the way I H8 the pens... so 4 me 2 say its a goal... its a goal :)
sens1fan 3 years ago
no goal u cant quite tell u can assume its in but due to birons glove getting in the way they have no choice but to call it no goal
DustyDinkleman26 3 years ago
dude its a goal
joey1228478 2 years ago
goal!!
RyanRunescape999 3 years ago
fucking goal
pallanweed 3 years ago 2
goal
1jhm 3 years ago
wait, does the whole puck have to cross the line or just a little? Just Asking.
dyskietka71 3 years ago
the whole puck, thats the rule, which made this goal so hard to call
The9thPawn 3 years ago 2
I'm a Flyer's and agree with both sides, leaning on the side of inconclusive evidence. Not that it matters anyway, it didn't change the outcome of the game like Kovalev's bullshit goal in the second round. However, I think if it was called a goal on the ice it wouldn't have been overturned either.
brentsexington 3 years ago
I'm a Flyers fan.
An i do think there was a chance that it was in, but since it was called no goal on the ice there has to be conclusive video to overturn it, physics and common sense don't have any say in it. this was the only part in this game where the refs didn't completely screw the Flyers Over. If you pittsburg fans want to win by cheating go ahead, but you never truely earned it.
cwsoccerxo 3 years ago
Somebody call the wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmbulance
TheT4xid3rmist 3 years ago 2
Or how about a whiner-burger and some french-cries? Or some cheese with that whine? Crosby scores alot but he's a bitch.
glaceauu 3 years ago
haha thank you!! LETS GO RED WINGS
me41239 3 years ago 2
See you have a legit team to root for. If it comes down to Pens vs. Wings, go Wings. They've been fricken freight train this whole season. I'm a Philly person though.
glaceauu 3 years ago
Flyers are definitely a bunch of bitches. When Crosby had a slight scrum with Richards at the end of game four, him and richards grabbed each other and Jason Smith comes from behind and pops Crosby in the back of the head. What a pussy move that was. Everyone knows when two guys are fighting, it's one on one, not two on one.
TheT4xid3rmist 3 years ago
how about this, every time the pens lose a game in the playoffs (before the wings at least) they have a big fit, and fight for little or no reason. They fight because their upset a team beat them? idiots. btw I'm a Wings fan! And we won the cup! BITCH!
The9thPawn 3 years ago
use common sense it was a goal
crosbyfreak 3 years ago
im a flyers fan
that definitely went in
but since they called no goal at first they had to review it
and there were no clear camera angles of white ice in between the puck and the red line, although you could clearly see that it was in the goal.
it would be like watching the video of a murder, and seeing somebody point a gun to the head of somebody else, but then something goes in front of the camera and the next thing you see is a dead person
haha thats the only way i could explain it
GO FLYERS
edawglemon 3 years ago
They should use common sense and basic physics.. It was a goald. That puck didn't stretch two inches after it went under the glove and not cross the line. Fortunately the Pens overpowered the Flyers and it worked out. The NHL needs much better and more camera angles near the goal.
Mugshotz53 3 years ago
goal buy inconclusive ref said no goal so i went to officials decision
aplehat 3 years ago
i think everyone can agree that was a goal, the only thing is the officials weren't 100 percent positive that it was a goal so it was ruled a no goal. Stupid I know but hey like Crosby needed another goal in the playoffs :P
The9thPawn 3 years ago
Actually, Crosby could use a few more goals in the playoffs. Just not against the Flyers.
brentsexington 3 years ago
definitely a goal.
oribasius 3 years ago
the last camera show clearly thats a goal
ledeux 3 years ago
that was SUCH a goal!
GBWrestling2008 3 years ago
true say
canadaguy124 3 years ago
Looks like a goal to me...not that it would have made a difference in the outcome of the game.
mottsfinkle 3 years ago