FUCK ALL YOU NAZI GESTAPO COPS THAT ARE DOING THIS TO YOUR FELLOW AMERICANS. YOU ARE JUST LIKE THE NAZI PIGS FROM LAST CENTURY. WE ARE WATCHING YOU AND FILMING YOU. YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE LATER BY A PEOPLES COURT. A NUREMBERG DEFENSE OF JUST "FOLLOWING ORDERS" WILL NOT GET YOU OUT OF WHAT IS WAITING FOR YOU.
"Thank you for your time" HA. In general I'm in your corner, BUT when you run away from his totally legitimate questions, you just look like a loser wasting our time; yours, his and mine.
@flashtin166 Interesting question, but I think that simply answering a question isn't grounds for submitting to a breathalyzer. Just like answering a question isn't grounds for illegal search, unless you agree to it.
I'm not from the states so maybe someone can help me out here.
I can see that he is not required to answered to answer the question but can someone tell me how does the law work with them compelling him to give a breathalizer test. Would he be legally compelled to do the test if he answered the question?
@flashtin166 The answer to that is the legal concept of "implied consent." When you sign your drivers license, or apply for your license, then you are consenting to have your breath and/or blood tested for intoxicants. Based on that, you do not have a Fifth Amendment right to refuse a breath or blood test ("implied consent") . P.S. -- Don't shoot the messenger.
According to Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz there are guidelines that have to be followed in order for a dui checkpoint to be legal. The supreme court ruled that yes, this is a violation of our 4th amendment rights, but it's ok, because of the state interest in stopping drunk drivers (which is a pretty dangerous precedent, but I digress).
Any of you that have negative comments about this video are fuckin idiots.. This is a form of harassment and a way for us to give up our rights.. No one wants drunk drivers out in the streets but if you're between the ages of 20-40 first person sees the checkpoint out goes a mass text to avoid.. This is not an affective way to stop drunk drivers only a way to ease in the loss of rights....
@6669990 truth? I'm for New World Disorder. 6.5 billion mass population reduction. The choosen ones, peeps like myself, would live in peace and harmony with ALL living beings, on sweet mother earf. Now can we 69? or are you a 49er
so you want unlicensed drunk drivers on the road?
the cops here can check anyone they see driving a vehicle for licenses and intoxication from drugs/alcohol and it is a damn good thing that they do, demanding that they need a warrent in order to do this is just plain stupid
if they don't want pple to drink and drive why do they build these amateur hour joints with parking lots? Now it's giving the kwaps another excuse to harass us.
You don't need a warrant for checkpoint in California. To stop somebody, you just need to give them something like a pamphlet. If you can smell alcohol when you go to give them a pamphlet you can send them to do a FST, and when they fail that they can be arrested. Supreme court ruled it was ok, and then each state made its own decision. Perfectly legal.
"Although there has been much debate over whether such roadblocks constitute illegal search and seizure, in 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that if sobriety checkpoints comply with federal requirements, they do not violate any constitutional amendments and are considered legal."
Personally, I think if we can reduce the number of intoxicated drivers on the road then that is good.
For the gentleman who believes that a license is required to drive period let alone in California needs to read Article 1 Section 10 of the US Constitution. It says states are not allowed to issue Letters of Marque. A letter of marque is a license. There for no "drivers, business, or other" licenses are permitted to be issued by a state. Please see supremacy clause. Then look at the issuer of the "License" in your wallet. As the government "We the People" need to take back our RIGHTS.
@fowabia Archaic. A letter of marque was issued by a nation to a privateer or mercenary to act on the behalf of that nation for the purpose of retaliating against another nation for some wrong, such as a border incursion or seizure.
it does not refer to a license. furthermore, the states may issue their own constitutions and laws as long as they do not violate federal laws. These police check points are authorized by the state and have been authorized by the Supreme Court.
First off I would quote the supremacy clause of the US Constitution Article 6 section 2 states that the constitution is first. Then the laws created by congress. After that the state constitution onto state laws and finally local laws. So working our way down from there we have Article 4 of the bill of rights, a congressional law, which tells the elected servants what we (the government) will not tolerate from them. The California constitution under article 1 section 7 also guarantees this.
@Underleaf76 Yes I DO! I am a military police officer! :) I hope you get pulled over for a DUI, give a cop doing his job bullshit, or insults, like you sent me and get arrested for NON COMPLIANCE!
@pettyofficer30 Well you need to go back in and get some more training, and then try reading your constitution and amendment rights. You are not better than me, you get paid to protect and serve, not bully people around, asshole. My hard earned tax money pays for you to put food on your table. Oh and you hope I get pulled over for DUI? How can I when I don't drink and drive moron? You can shove your non compliance bullshit up your ass, I'm not afraid of you.
@Underleaf76 I pay taxes too! I pay MY SALARY! I never "bullied" you; wtf? It's people like YOU that DO NOT know the statutes, (federal os state) get into shit storms with the police and get arrested. Lady, you have NO BUSINESS talking to me like a high school punk!
@pettyofficer30 try reading your original post one more time, because it's official you are ignorant, and you can't pay your own paychecks, you have to receive one before you can pay anything, it all starts when you make an oath and get your first paycheck. Stop fooling yourself. And I guarantee you I'm older than you, so stop trying to make yourself bigger than me tough guy. Hide behind your little badge or whatever it is you wear, after all you are petty for an officer :)
@pettyofficer30 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution guards against unreasonable searches and seizures along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause It was adopted as a response to the abuse of the writ of assistance which is a type of general search warrant in the American Revolution Search and arrest should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court usually by a law enforcement officer.
I thought the cops did a What piss me off is asshole dipshits like you. That think the 4th amendment means the cops can not say hi to you without a search warrant, you are wrong.
(Against unreasonable searches and seizures) is what controls when the cops need a warrant not some freeman asshole dipshit.
The dui check points have been to supreme court of the United States of America a few times over the years and different judges on that court have up held that they are legal. Not only that but other state supreme court has also held them to be legal. By the way I am not a cop.
I thought the cops did a very good job of neutralizing the check points all by themselves. The radio and TV announces beforehand that there will be a check point, where, when. The cops put signs up blocks before, at night bring out large flood lights. If the people are to drunk to take a turn or take a different route they deserve to get locked up for a very long time.
Stopping someone's freedom of movement without probable cause is against the law. These cops do not know the law or just don't give a shit! Most cops are just illiterate thugs. But they sure know how to bully people and make up bullshit laws on the spot if they know you don't know the law. Know your rights or you have none!
That cop literally came out of that convo looking better than you. You gotta know your shit before you stick a camera in front of a cop acting like you know more than he does.
Be careful if you cross into unincorporated Whittier, it's policed by LA Sheriffs and they are thugs! Whittier police department is subcontracted out to "serve" Santa Fe Springs. There are enough criminals in those two cities to get them "on edge" and ready to throw-down, so don't be comfortable.
You're right, to be safe, plan on a taxi. Also, always video tape police actions with at least 2 people and 2 cameras!
Leffingwell and Imperial are other places they put check points.
"dont need a warrant" really the court of california says its legal. hate to break it to that smug bastard cop but the US constitution is above the california court system so yes you are breaking the law you son of a bitch pig. did you not learn this in school when you grew up i know they taught US history and the constitution and founding fathers
@foxtrot1162 I loved your comment. I could tell you were really pissed! And I feel the same way. Why break out a camera and go thru all that shit if you're ate up with dumbass? The guy who created this video is an idiot. There is a saying: A little knowledge is more dangerous than no knowledge.
@buddybleau your right i am pissed. i take this shit personally becuse im so sick of the government and their thug enforcers having total disregard to the constitution. they have broke their oath and then they go out on the hunt to kill and procecute ppl who have done nothing wrong. setting up check points is illegal and these bastards need to start waking up to the fact they are breaking the law. how can they enforce the law and expect citizens to obey the law when they break it.
@foxtrot1162 The problem is that most of these bastard so called law enforcement officers don't even know the law. I hope some other dumb son of a bitch is giving their mother hell somewhere. The reason we get thugs for cops is because the pay is so low. You won't get educated men to work for that price. These thugs don't mind the low pay because they really only want power. Big badge and a small dick!
@buddybleau the few cops who are educated end up getting forced out of the police dept because they rufues to obey the unconstiutional orders they give the power hungry criminals a badge and a gun to go out and terrorize ppl and violate their rights the ppl who make a stand get arrested or killed. just like randy weaver on ruby ridge idaho he told thee feds he wont snitch for them and they surround his house with 400 men and APCs then killed his 14 yo boy and his wife while she held a baby
@buddybleau waco texas the federal terrorists killed over 80 ppl and it was somthing like 20 of em were kids. no matter what anyone thinks about david koresh innocent or guilty the feds cant justify killing all those ppl especially kids even if he was guilty which i dont think he was. and of course we have the corrupt media who reports the governments lies as facts to get the rest of the sheeple hyped up about it. funny our government gets away with murder and no one seems to care. WTF!!
@foxtrot1162 Unfortunately, what you say is true. The problem is, most people don't know the law, so the masses never complain. I say this: "Know your rights, or you have none"! Thanks for the comment.
@foxtrot1162 That's the great thing about the internet and YouTube. With the internet, people are beginning to wake up. They are educating themselves. I am 71yrs. old and have lived my whole life not knowing how the government's have been taking advantage of me. They don't want anyone to know the truth! Cops that are ignorant of the Constitution are easy to send out into the streets to generate revenue for their corporation (town, county or state). Git out thar boy, make us some money!
@buddybleau im 23 i started to wake up to the truth when i was 17. now im an online activist for the truth and freedom. i found out about anyone who is on probation for a federal crime. this is not to say if someone breaks the law they shouldnt be punished however in the probation documents it says you cant associate with anyone who has a felony on their record without permission now ppl make mistake but since when does violating their 1st amendment come into punishment
@buddybleau i dont understand why our government is so hell bent on destroying the freedom that good ppl died for to protect. its a slap in the face to the soldiers who have sacrificed it all for our freedom. have you heard about the fema camps. if you havnt i will send a video to you for you to watch it shows how they plan to lock up anyone who doesnt go along with the status quo they look like prisons but they are far more sinister. they will put whole familys in them even kids for no reason.
@foxtrot1162 The fact that they're taking away your freedom is not what they are concerned about. They love power. That's all they're interested in. Notice that most people that have been owned by police is because the citizen didn't know his rights. Know your rights or you have none!
@buddybleau i agree but even those who know their rights are being abuse too they get labled by cops however those who know their rights are going to be able to change the future and educate others and wake them up as well. ive seen ppl be labled as terrorists because they were talking about the constitution to cops. its like instead of it being a document of freedom now ppl who talk about it are called terror threats. amazing how the founding fathers ideals are frowned upon the the feds
@foxtrot1162 You must keep in mind that most cops don't know the law and certainly they know nothing about the Constitution. It's the luck of the draw. Depends on which cop stops you. Not all cops are thugs, just the majority. Good luck! You're labeled terrorist because of that idiot baby Bush, he's the one who signed the Patriot Act 1&2. Thanks for the comment. Good luck.
@buddybleau Thank you. i proudly have a dont tread on me flag hanging up in my house and if they ever decide to break down my door and take me off for being a true patriot i will be holding that flag and they will have to pry it from my cold dead hands. i will never accept this tyranny i would rather die a thousand times over than become a slave to the new world order. im a christian i have Jesus backing me in my corner so no matter what i will win and they will lose
@buddybleau there is a special place reserved in hell for these evil satanist new world order members. they enjoy doing the devils work on earth but soon enough they will burn forever when Jesus returns. my faith gives me the strength to keep speaking out against these evil doers who have brought so much pain to the world.
@foxtrot1162 I don't believe in hell any more than I believe in heaven. But I admire your spunk. We should all look out for one another and try to make life better. Keep up the good work. Just be careful what you say. Think, before putting any comments on here.
@buddybleau Im only exersizing my right to free speech. i do know however the feds like to monitor these sites but i dont fear them i do apreciate your concern though.
Fuck those pigs, making it seem like they're just doing their job.. They're going to get you use to this, than once you're use to it; it will be more often, than they're will arrest anyone because of their ethnicity.
1st of all put more check points catch these drunk idiots! no limit... you don't understand how many people get killed or hurt as a result of the negligence of these individuals! wanna punk police go for the ones wasting time on bs tickets. Catch criminals not bull infractions! I think you doing something interesting but not valid on this subject. You go tell that to the families killed because of the DUI's
@ChampsElysees100 this video has nothing to do with that its about checking everyone. second not only do they have to have probable cause they also have to have a warrant its in the constitution word for word they need both not just probable cause the laws on the book that say they only need probable cause are unconstitutional and therefore illegal because the constitution is the supreme law of the land.
YOU TALK SO MUCH CRAP!! YOU GET PAID DIRTY MONEY TO DO THIS I KNOW IT!! IT WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU SOON YOU WILL THINK BACK IN YOUR LIFE AND KNOW YOU ARE A DIRTY GROUP!! ITS OVER. YOUR TIME WILL COME ASWELL JUST LIKE GEDDAFI,SEDDAM,MOBAREK,BIN ALI, YEMEN PRESIDENT, SAUDI ARABIA, BESSHAR ASSAD. ALL BAD PEOPLE END THIS WAY. PREPARE YOURS!! DIRTS PEOPLE!! YOUR DISCUSSTING TOO LOOK AT AND YOU ARE STUPID PEOPLE. AMERICA AND EUROPE ARE 100% BETTER THAN YOU DIRTY PEOPLE ALL YOU TALK ABOUT IS RUBBISH
Check points are a complete scam to extract money from Americans and violates their rights. Hard to believe these guys raised their right hand and swore to defend the Constitution. On another note, Whittier Police are corrupted pedophiles, thugs, and guys that cheat on their wives.
Someday there will be another Revolution and the police that have violated our rights for years will be in some sorry ass shape.
who decides when your to drunk to drive , who made it .08 it was the stinking lawyers all drunk drivers who are dangerious have .10 or higher. this low was done to make money for the lawyers. wake up sheep your being butt fuc---
WOW dude if you r going to attack the police with law questions get your FACTS straight first. Find the law where it says they need a warrant to conduct a DUI chk point so you don't look like and sound like a idiot. Really your busting their balls about something that should be done due to ppl are driving drunk and killing innocent ppl and their families. There are bad cops but there are good ones to so until you understand their job and what they go through from ppl
Looks like a cellphone video. May i suggest a full HD (1920x1080) camcorder? I use a Canon Vixia HF10. Works fantastic for Catching Police Corruption, especially at night.
I don't see what the problem with DUI checkpoints is, it is getting drunk drivers off the road. They have them here in New Zealand all the time, if your not drunk there is no problem.
@bassetthound007 I see your point. So by your logic one should have no issues with the police searching your pockets while walking down the street or your home whenever the feel like it. After all, if you have nothing to hide then what's the big deal?
Our system of law dictates that there is only one way to remove a right belonging to the people. That is by a person knowingly waiving a particular right. Some of the confusion in our present system has arisen because many millions of people have waived their right to travel unrestricted, and opted into the jurisdiction of the state. Those who have knowingly given up these rights are legally regulated by state law, and must obtain permits, registrations, insurance, etc.
Given the Constitutional implications in the matter, it turns on a Strict Scrutiny analysis. United States courts has reviewing standards of rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny is part of a hierarchy of standards employed by courts to weigh an asserted government interest against a constitutional right or principle that conflicts with the manner in which the interest is being pursued.
combined powers of the general, and of a state government.” In Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530, 544-45 (1962), Justice Harlan asserted that Chief Justice Marshall in the Canter case “did not mean to imply that the case heard by the Key West court was not one of admiralty jurisdiction otherwise properly justiciable in a Federal District Court sitting in one of the States. All the Chief Justice meant . is that in the territories cases and controversies falling within the enumeration of
defined in the 3rd article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress, in the execution of those general powers which that body possesses over the territories of the United States.” 26 U.S. at 546.The Court went on to hold that admiralty jurisdiction can be exercised in the States only in those courts which are established in pursuance of Article III, but that the same limitation does not apply to the territorial courts, for in legislating for them “Congress exercises the combined
judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the general government, can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They are legislative courts, created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations, respecting the territory belonging to the United States. The jurisdiction, with which they are invested, is not a part of that judicial power which is defined in
powers, and have comprised a significant part of the federal judiciary. The distinction between constitutional courts and legislative courts was first made in American Ins. Co. v. Canter 26 U.S. (1 Pet.) 511 (1828) which involved the question of the admiralty jurisdiction of the territorial court of Florida, the judges of which were limited to a four-year term in office.
Said Chief Justice Marshall for the Court:
“These courts, then, are not constitutional courts, in which the judicial power
"It is needless to accumulate cases on this subject. Those already referred to, and the cases of Capron v. Van Noorden, in 2 Cr. 126, and Montalet v. Murray, 4 Cr. 46, are sufficient to show the rule of which we have spoken. The case of Capron v. Van Noorden strikingly illustrates the difference between a common law court and a court of the United States." Legislative courts, they are so-called because they are created by Congress in pursuance of its general legislative powers, and
(2) Any vessel registered, licensed, or enrolled under the laws of the United States, and being on a voyage upon the waters of any of the Great Lakes, or any of the waters connecting them, or upon the Saint Lawrence River where the same constitutes the International Boundary Line. Statutes created by the U.S. Congress are constitutional for the purpose of its citizens and personnel and in the interest of the Public and Public Policy Law:
and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State, and any vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof, or to any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, when such vessel is within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State.
Here above the Supreme Court agrees with my firm position that Admiralty is the aggressive parent of maritime jurisdiction as will be further evidenced below: TITLE 18: PART I, CHAPTER 1§ 7. Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States defined The term “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States”, as used in this title, includes: (1) The high seas, any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,,,,,
“It [The United States] exercises the discretionary power of a State Government in authorizing the establishment of a court in which the judges hold their appointments for a term of years only, and not during good behavior, and it exercises the power of the General Government in investing that court with admiralty jurisdiction, over which the General Government had exclusive jurisdiction in the Territory.” (Italics mine) (Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393. Id at pages: 445-446)
i use to live in whittier california for more that 18 years this kind DUI check points been happening every 2 months with out warning every year since 1992 most all the time in whittier blv near withttier hospital
Big ups to the infowarrior Felipe, make more videos! Bob Atkinson sounds like he doesn't really understand the issue at hand...the issue is NOT whether people are abusing their driving privileges. The issue is the gov't agencies from the city level all the way up to the federal level are effectively stripping us, the people, of our rights to privacy which is protected by the 4th amendment. We are protected by the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. AND YOU DO NEED A WARRANT LYING SCUM PIG!
L.A. has had checkpoints since 1971 . If the u.s. was free . I never lived it in my lifetime . Seams to me thier pickin on whittier people ! Great video ......
pardon my french but look at these cock suckin pigs, searchin through peoples trunks and shit with no probable cause, driver still sitting in his vehicle, what is this fucking counntry coming to , wake up people.........
dude, if you're gonna confront the police like you did you NEED to know exactly what law it is you were unable to recite. i know you are right but saying to the leo that you know theres a law that demands a warrant doesnt cut it to an officer who seemed clueless. you were confronting them, next time have some paperwork with you so youre not left with your dick in the wind, seriously. applauding your balls though!
and on top of the savings they make by not having to fix you! And by gaining more tax due to you being able to work, they also make money fining the people that break the so called law! Do you see a pattern here? It's about money! It's all bullshit! There only need be 3 laws! Don't harm anyone, don't cause anyone loss, and don't be fraudulent in your contracts! Now tell me a situation that can't be dealt with by these 3 laws!
BloodyPooProductions... I think personally there is a huge difference between legal and lawful... Laws are universal, and have been around since recorded time, like murder and theft etc... The rest? This legal bullshit, is just that! Bullshit! They are only there to oppress, control and gain REVENUE! Example, seatbelt, you think the government gives a shit about you? They care about tax! They care about how much it will cost to fix you! So they force you to wear a seatbelt!
Doesn't matter what you say, the US Supreme court said that DUI Roadblocks are constitutional and unless the US Supreme court makes a law for the US Supreme Court to overturn previous US Supreme court decisions, the law is legal. Besides, don't people have better things to worry about, like the Patriot Act?
was that a diet beverage the officer had? His brain is probably so ate up from aspartame its not worth your time asking him questions. Its a shame the folks we let protect and serve us, they will never solve any crime being so asleep.
@carljosephcummings Check the po-po cars in your area from now on. I'll bet you won't find a one of them that has that old "to protect and serve" on them... anywhere. They've all been federalized and work for big brother now.
Philipe, the law you were referring to, that the cop kept asking you "what law?" is the Bill of Rights, man! The first 10 amendments to the Constitution for the United States of America! It states in part, that we are free from illegal search and seizure, the need for a warrant, etc. Next time, tell the cop it's not just a law, it's the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!....the 4th amendment to the Constitution! And it is superior to whatever some lower court decided in California.
netgrab, are Philipe?...the one who called in to Alex Jones today, Tuesday June 14, and spoke of this situation? The caller said he had video and that most people, including some cops weren't going along with this. Is this the video the caller (you?) referred to or is there more? Thanks. And good job, Patriot!
netgrab, are you the one who called in to Alex Jones today, Tuesday June 14, and spoke of this situation? The caller said he had video and that most people, including some cops weren't going along with this. Is this the video the caller referred to or is there more? Thanks.
The LAW is Constitution of the State of California! - NOT the STATUTES!
Learn the difference folks!
Regulations and Statutes are brought upon you by YOUR CONTRACT when you stupidly signed because you were "so scared".
Did you ask your government for permission to have a wife too? Yeah - you did - you signed a MARRIAGE LICENSE didn't you! You just stated on paper that your children are WARDS OF THE STATE.
Fact: Certificate of Origination on your vehicle is in the hands of the DMV. You do NOT own your cars - NO. The states own the "vehicles". You need a license to drive THEIR vehicle upon the public highways. The license is PERMISSION to perform an act which is normally illegal. Terms: Vehicle, Driving - they are legal terms.
Traveling on the public highways in a motor carriage does NOT require a license! You've ALL BEEN FOOLED BY CONTRACT!!
First of all, yes the State owns your vehicle. As well as your house. The proof is in the words "property taxation". Try not paying the State the tax (rent) on that property and you'll find the rightful owner taking it back!
Now, when you call me names and imply that I don't know what I'm talking about, you might want to use a Dictionary for the following words: "stupid" "the" "retarded".
Now go do some homework sunny before I slap you again. Who holds the Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin ? The DMV! Not you! And what is a License? Frankly put : A receipt of Permission to perform that which is normally illegal. Why would driving be illegal without it? Because it's NOT YOUR CAR DUDE! You only RENT IT! HAHAHAHAHA - Jokes on YOU! Wake up!
@anabusedman I bought my car for three thousand dollars in 2006. Added a few things here and there and then sold it in 2008 for five thousand. How is it possible to modify and then sell something that you don't own and only rent and make a profit?
I live on the other side of the hill from Whittier....hey netgrab..what the hell man! When the cop asked you to show him the law you should have told him its the 4th amendment to the constitution and no law wether state or federal can supercede the constitution! Please be prepared next time you do something like this. It makes the asshole cops look smarter than us.
in canada this is completely normal they do this shit every night, catching drunk drivers is fine, however i think that people trading freedom for complete safety is rediculous, enjoy your new found "life"
by the way i like the smug ass look on the cops face at the end. he is asking for the law which states there checkstop is legal yet somehow i don't think he himself knows it. DOUBLE FAIL
The scariest thing about this video is the cop at the end who asked you what law said he needs a warrant to search people's cars. He said something like "All I know is what I am doing is legal" He should have said "I don't really know anything. I do not think for myself. All I know is that I have been told that what I am doing is legal. I mean..do you know how many laws there are? (actually they are not "laws" just "rules" & "codes") I cannot understand all that..I just do as I am told
this is mos def true...two things-its difficult, but if so many people do the wrong thing, then how can we save lives?? Funny, I never hear anyone, at concerts or gatherings, complain about being searched..we dont want beer bottles thrown at our heads, right? Yes, if they couldnt bust you for anything other than drunk driving, would be great...drunk driving is the worst possible..its death or maiming, looking for a place to land. I smoke herbage, I dont smoke like that either....peace
BTW, you can get free purse-sized copies of the Constitution and Bill of Rights from The Heritage Foundation and ACLJ (American Center for Law & Justice). I'm not spamming. I just wonder how many American citizens have actually read the Bill of Rights. It's rapidly disappearing into ether.
Heard you on the Alex Jones Show. Excellent video. More people need to do things like this. Please don't pay attention to the negative comments. Keep up the good work. I think we should all carry around a pocket constitution and bill of rights so we can just point to the rights that are getting violated and can use less time and energy with this bullshit :)
You probably already thought of this but the next time you go to a checkpoint to check if the cops have a warrant and tell them they must have one to be acting legally, look up the law and commit it to memory.. I know you know it and under pressure (I'd be a bit nervous too telling a cop what he is doing is illegal) had a data -grid-lock in your head... I don't know where it is in the Ca Const. or BofR but it's the 4th Amend in the united States Constitution..."...no warrant shall issue ...
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizuress, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED, and no Warrants shall issue, BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE, SUPPORTED BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION, AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING THE PLACE TO BE SEARCHED, AND THE PERSON OR THINGS TO BE SEIZED.
From the Bill of Rights. I didn't write it, I just quote it.
What makes it legal is listed under the link. Go armed with the facts next time and ask the right questions as to whether they are doing it by the book. They don't need a warrant, but they need to still do it legally. Otherwise, it's time to get some new precedents from the courts to make California like the 12 states who uphold these checkpoint as unconstitutional.
Hey Felipe, I heard you on AJ's show. Good job confronting those guys (the cops) and ALONE too! Good idea keeping some distance in between. One little criticism, let that first man talk! He seemed to be the most educated in law and rights. The second guy seemed like his highest priority was getting along with everybody. ...another victim of PCS (politically correct syndrome) (continued on next coment)
FUCK ALL YOU NAZI GESTAPO COPS THAT ARE DOING THIS TO YOUR FELLOW AMERICANS. YOU ARE JUST LIKE THE NAZI PIGS FROM LAST CENTURY. WE ARE WATCHING YOU AND FILMING YOU. YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE LATER BY A PEOPLES COURT. A NUREMBERG DEFENSE OF JUST "FOLLOWING ORDERS" WILL NOT GET YOU OUT OF WHAT IS WAITING FOR YOU.
HangNazisNow 23 hours ago
Illegal? I thought these were all illegal. WTF.
georgewashington2050 1 day ago
Everyone is a lawyer
jbeason9 1 week ago
"Thank you for your time" HA. In general I'm in your corner, BUT when you run away from his totally legitimate questions, you just look like a loser wasting our time; yours, his and mine.
jcisbell 2 weeks ago
@flashtin166 Interesting question, but I think that simply answering a question isn't grounds for submitting to a breathalyzer. Just like answering a question isn't grounds for illegal search, unless you agree to it.
navsquid32 2 weeks ago
I'm not from the states so maybe someone can help me out here.
I can see that he is not required to answered to answer the question but can someone tell me how does the law work with them compelling him to give a breathalizer test. Would he be legally compelled to do the test if he answered the question?
flashtin166 2 weeks ago
@flashtin166 The answer to that is the legal concept of "implied consent." When you sign your drivers license, or apply for your license, then you are consenting to have your breath and/or blood tested for intoxicants. Based on that, you do not have a Fifth Amendment right to refuse a breath or blood test ("implied consent") . P.S. -- Don't shoot the messenger.
toplonghorn 1 week ago
man or woman? seriously?
FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 3 weeks ago
uuuhhhhhhhhhuuuummmmmmm meh???
FIGHT1FOR2CHANGE3 3 weeks ago
Pro tip: If you are going to debate someone with the law. SHOW HIM IN BLACK AND WHITE!
Clanki 4 weeks ago
According to Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz there are guidelines that have to be followed in order for a dui checkpoint to be legal. The supreme court ruled that yes, this is a violation of our 4th amendment rights, but it's ok, because of the state interest in stopping drunk drivers (which is a pretty dangerous precedent, but I digress).
prettychainsaw 4 weeks ago
Any of you that have negative comments about this video are fuckin idiots.. This is a form of harassment and a way for us to give up our rights.. No one wants drunk drivers out in the streets but if you're between the ages of 20-40 first person sees the checkpoint out goes a mass text to avoid.. This is not an affective way to stop drunk drivers only a way to ease in the loss of rights....
BigTim951 4 weeks ago
You're an idiot. It's a fin DUI checkpoint. Let it be.
RicanRito 1 month ago
a freeman on the land does NOT need a licsence. The alcoholic guy is an idiot. They need to go door to door and remove all the illegals
caessarion 1 month ago
@caessarion so you are for a controlled state?
6669990 2 weeks ago
@6669990 truth? I'm for New World Disorder. 6.5 billion mass population reduction. The choosen ones, peeps like myself, would live in peace and harmony with ALL living beings, on sweet mother earf. Now can we 69? or are you a 49er
caessarion 2 weeks ago
You ignorant. Read the 4th Amendment and the exclusionary rules (imminent domain).
Kurt19641 1 month ago
Dude, Good Job
Resoses 1 month ago
so you want unlicensed drunk drivers on the road?
the cops here can check anyone they see driving a vehicle for licenses and intoxication from drugs/alcohol and it is a damn good thing that they do, demanding that they need a warrent in order to do this is just plain stupid
TheDannrz 1 month ago
This guy is an idiot.
fuckingbrandon 2 months ago
That was very good. What law did you find to support your views. Example: SR1070
hfurjiskkr5 2 months ago
Your a true paisa idiot. You make us Mexican Americans look STUPID. Dig a hole, jump and burry yourself. Idiot.
poncefam6 2 months ago
good for you,man.
mickoner 2 months ago
if they don't want pple to drink and drive why do they build these amateur hour joints with parking lots? Now it's giving the kwaps another excuse to harass us.
ensgavry 2 months ago
Surveillance is Security!!
A Message From The Department Of Fantasyland Security
grasshopperjunction 2 months ago 7
You don't need a warrant for checkpoint in California. To stop somebody, you just need to give them something like a pamphlet. If you can smell alcohol when you go to give them a pamphlet you can send them to do a FST, and when they fail that they can be arrested. Supreme court ruled it was ok, and then each state made its own decision. Perfectly legal.
ArmaEditor 2 months ago
I hope they catch some illegal Mexicans while they do this. 2 birds with one stone.
Aethan001 2 months ago
dont drink and drive and youll never have this issue. btw, better a ticket then a life. just my opinion.
dakinehawaiian79 3 months ago
Comment removed
ddebenedictis 3 months ago
"Although there has been much debate over whether such roadblocks constitute illegal search and seizure, in 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that if sobriety checkpoints comply with federal requirements, they do not violate any constitutional amendments and are considered legal."
Personally, I think if we can reduce the number of intoxicated drivers on the road then that is good.
ddebenedictis 3 months ago
i know his name! :)
djgoodjuice 3 months ago
For the gentleman who believes that a license is required to drive period let alone in California needs to read Article 1 Section 10 of the US Constitution. It says states are not allowed to issue Letters of Marque. A letter of marque is a license. There for no "drivers, business, or other" licenses are permitted to be issued by a state. Please see supremacy clause. Then look at the issuer of the "License" in your wallet. As the government "We the People" need to take back our RIGHTS.
fowabia 4 months ago
@fowabia Archaic. A letter of marque was issued by a nation to a privateer or mercenary to act on the behalf of that nation for the purpose of retaliating against another nation for some wrong, such as a border incursion or seizure.
it does not refer to a license. furthermore, the states may issue their own constitutions and laws as long as they do not violate federal laws. These police check points are authorized by the state and have been authorized by the Supreme Court.
WesAMV7569 3 months ago
First off I would quote the supremacy clause of the US Constitution Article 6 section 2 states that the constitution is first. Then the laws created by congress. After that the state constitution onto state laws and finally local laws. So working our way down from there we have Article 4 of the bill of rights, a congressional law, which tells the elected servants what we (the government) will not tolerate from them. The California constitution under article 1 section 7 also guarantees this.
fowabia 4 months ago
The twerp demanding the police show him "a warrant" for a DUI checkpoint needs his ass beat. Stupid fuckshit.
Blahblobify 4 months ago
@Blahblobify get a grip, fruitkake. lol
grasshopperjunction 2 months ago
The cops DO NOT a warrant for a DUI checkpoint! IDIOT!
pettyofficer30 4 months ago
@pettyofficer30 are you even american? What you said does not even make sense. They do need a warrant IDIOT!
Underleaf76 4 months ago
@Underleaf76 I am Active duty military, born and raised in Michigan. Your point?
pettyofficer30 4 months ago
@pettyofficer30 my point is you're american, and you don't even know your rights. SAD
Underleaf76 4 months ago
@Underleaf76 Yes I DO! I am a military police officer! :) I hope you get pulled over for a DUI, give a cop doing his job bullshit, or insults, like you sent me and get arrested for NON COMPLIANCE!
pettyofficer30 4 months ago
@pettyofficer30 Well you need to go back in and get some more training, and then try reading your constitution and amendment rights. You are not better than me, you get paid to protect and serve, not bully people around, asshole. My hard earned tax money pays for you to put food on your table. Oh and you hope I get pulled over for DUI? How can I when I don't drink and drive moron? You can shove your non compliance bullshit up your ass, I'm not afraid of you.
Underleaf76 4 months ago
@Underleaf76 I pay taxes too! I pay MY SALARY! I never "bullied" you; wtf? It's people like YOU that DO NOT know the statutes, (federal os state) get into shit storms with the police and get arrested. Lady, you have NO BUSINESS talking to me like a high school punk!
pettyofficer30 4 months ago
@pettyofficer30 try reading your original post one more time, because it's official you are ignorant, and you can't pay your own paychecks, you have to receive one before you can pay anything, it all starts when you make an oath and get your first paycheck. Stop fooling yourself. And I guarantee you I'm older than you, so stop trying to make yourself bigger than me tough guy. Hide behind your little badge or whatever it is you wear, after all you are petty for an officer :)
Underleaf76 4 months ago
@Underleaf76 You are older than me by 3 years! Big deal, if you were near menopause maybe I would take you more serious as a woman.
pettyofficer30 4 months ago
@pettyofficer30 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution guards against unreasonable searches and seizures along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause It was adopted as a response to the abuse of the writ of assistance which is a type of general search warrant in the American Revolution Search and arrest should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court usually by a law enforcement officer.
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@pettyofficer30 like a give a hair off a mule's tail what you think, dipshit. lol
grasshopperjunction 2 months ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@grasshopperjunction Like a give a FUCK what you think! FUCK YOU, you cop hater!
pettyofficer30 2 months ago
Comment removed
grasshopperjunction 2 months ago
I thought the cops did a What piss me off is asshole dipshits like you. That think the 4th amendment means the cops can not say hi to you without a search warrant, you are wrong.
(Against unreasonable searches and seizures) is what controls when the cops need a warrant not some freeman asshole dipshit.
samten10a 4 months ago
The dui check points have been to supreme court of the United States of America a few times over the years and different judges on that court have up held that they are legal. Not only that but other state supreme court has also held them to be legal. By the way I am not a cop.
samten10a 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I thought the cops did a very good job of neutralizing the check points all by themselves. The radio and TV announces beforehand that there will be a check point, where, when. The cops put signs up blocks before, at night bring out large flood lights. If the people are to drunk to take a turn or take a different route they deserve to get locked up for a very long time.
samten10a 4 months ago
Stopping someone's freedom of movement without probable cause is against the law. These cops do not know the law or just don't give a shit! Most cops are just illiterate thugs. But they sure know how to bully people and make up bullshit laws on the spot if they know you don't know the law. Know your rights or you have none!
buddybleau 4 months ago
LOL you didn't even know the law.
That cop literally came out of that convo looking better than you. You gotta know your shit before you stick a camera in front of a cop acting like you know more than he does.
haroof 5 months ago
dude ur an idiot u dont know what ur talking about... a warrant for a checkpoint.. ur ridiculous
backatchalol 5 months ago 2
Be careful if you cross into unincorporated Whittier, it's policed by LA Sheriffs and they are thugs! Whittier police department is subcontracted out to "serve" Santa Fe Springs. There are enough criminals in those two cities to get them "on edge" and ready to throw-down, so don't be comfortable.
You're right, to be safe, plan on a taxi. Also, always video tape police actions with at least 2 people and 2 cameras!
Leffingwell and Imperial are other places they put check points.
mlauntube 5 months ago
"dont need a warrant" really the court of california says its legal. hate to break it to that smug bastard cop but the US constitution is above the california court system so yes you are breaking the law you son of a bitch pig. did you not learn this in school when you grew up i know they taught US history and the constitution and founding fathers
foxtrot1162 5 months ago
@foxtrot1162 I loved your comment. I could tell you were really pissed! And I feel the same way. Why break out a camera and go thru all that shit if you're ate up with dumbass? The guy who created this video is an idiot. There is a saying: A little knowledge is more dangerous than no knowledge.
buddybleau 4 months ago
@buddybleau your right i am pissed. i take this shit personally becuse im so sick of the government and their thug enforcers having total disregard to the constitution. they have broke their oath and then they go out on the hunt to kill and procecute ppl who have done nothing wrong. setting up check points is illegal and these bastards need to start waking up to the fact they are breaking the law. how can they enforce the law and expect citizens to obey the law when they break it.
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@foxtrot1162 The problem is that most of these bastard so called law enforcement officers don't even know the law. I hope some other dumb son of a bitch is giving their mother hell somewhere. The reason we get thugs for cops is because the pay is so low. You won't get educated men to work for that price. These thugs don't mind the low pay because they really only want power. Big badge and a small dick!
buddybleau 4 months ago
@buddybleau the few cops who are educated end up getting forced out of the police dept because they rufues to obey the unconstiutional orders they give the power hungry criminals a badge and a gun to go out and terrorize ppl and violate their rights the ppl who make a stand get arrested or killed. just like randy weaver on ruby ridge idaho he told thee feds he wont snitch for them and they surround his house with 400 men and APCs then killed his 14 yo boy and his wife while she held a baby
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@buddybleau waco texas the federal terrorists killed over 80 ppl and it was somthing like 20 of em were kids. no matter what anyone thinks about david koresh innocent or guilty the feds cant justify killing all those ppl especially kids even if he was guilty which i dont think he was. and of course we have the corrupt media who reports the governments lies as facts to get the rest of the sheeple hyped up about it. funny our government gets away with murder and no one seems to care. WTF!!
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@foxtrot1162 Unfortunately, what you say is true. The problem is, most people don't know the law, so the masses never complain. I say this: "Know your rights, or you have none"! Thanks for the comment.
buddybleau 4 months ago
@buddybleau I agree thats why im trying to reach ppl all over the place via youtube and facebook in an effort to wake them up and educate them
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@foxtrot1162 That's the great thing about the internet and YouTube. With the internet, people are beginning to wake up. They are educating themselves. I am 71yrs. old and have lived my whole life not knowing how the government's have been taking advantage of me. They don't want anyone to know the truth! Cops that are ignorant of the Constitution are easy to send out into the streets to generate revenue for their corporation (town, county or state). Git out thar boy, make us some money!
buddybleau 4 months ago
@buddybleau im 23 i started to wake up to the truth when i was 17. now im an online activist for the truth and freedom. i found out about anyone who is on probation for a federal crime. this is not to say if someone breaks the law they shouldnt be punished however in the probation documents it says you cant associate with anyone who has a felony on their record without permission now ppl make mistake but since when does violating their 1st amendment come into punishment
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@buddybleau i dont understand why our government is so hell bent on destroying the freedom that good ppl died for to protect. its a slap in the face to the soldiers who have sacrificed it all for our freedom. have you heard about the fema camps. if you havnt i will send a video to you for you to watch it shows how they plan to lock up anyone who doesnt go along with the status quo they look like prisons but they are far more sinister. they will put whole familys in them even kids for no reason.
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@foxtrot1162 The fact that they're taking away your freedom is not what they are concerned about. They love power. That's all they're interested in. Notice that most people that have been owned by police is because the citizen didn't know his rights. Know your rights or you have none!
buddybleau 4 months ago
@buddybleau i agree but even those who know their rights are being abuse too they get labled by cops however those who know their rights are going to be able to change the future and educate others and wake them up as well. ive seen ppl be labled as terrorists because they were talking about the constitution to cops. its like instead of it being a document of freedom now ppl who talk about it are called terror threats. amazing how the founding fathers ideals are frowned upon the the feds
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@foxtrot1162 You must keep in mind that most cops don't know the law and certainly they know nothing about the Constitution. It's the luck of the draw. Depends on which cop stops you. Not all cops are thugs, just the majority. Good luck! You're labeled terrorist because of that idiot baby Bush, he's the one who signed the Patriot Act 1&2. Thanks for the comment. Good luck.
buddybleau 4 months ago
@buddybleau Thank you. i proudly have a dont tread on me flag hanging up in my house and if they ever decide to break down my door and take me off for being a true patriot i will be holding that flag and they will have to pry it from my cold dead hands. i will never accept this tyranny i would rather die a thousand times over than become a slave to the new world order. im a christian i have Jesus backing me in my corner so no matter what i will win and they will lose
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@buddybleau there is a special place reserved in hell for these evil satanist new world order members. they enjoy doing the devils work on earth but soon enough they will burn forever when Jesus returns. my faith gives me the strength to keep speaking out against these evil doers who have brought so much pain to the world.
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@foxtrot1162 I don't believe in hell any more than I believe in heaven. But I admire your spunk. We should all look out for one another and try to make life better. Keep up the good work. Just be careful what you say. Think, before putting any comments on here.
buddybleau 4 months ago
@buddybleau Im only exersizing my right to free speech. i do know however the feds like to monitor these sites but i dont fear them i do apreciate your concern though.
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
@buddybleau Thank you
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
im so sick of cops doing this they are commiting treason by doing these searches
foxtrot1162 5 months ago
@foxtrot1162 You are soooo right. Makes me disgusted!!
buddybleau 4 months ago
If you are going to confront LEO and argue the 4th, have your shit together enough to verbalize it!
I commend your guts for video taping and confronting them!
Let's see a follow-up on your findings!
Turbozag 5 months ago
@Turbozag He don't have guts, he has stupidity!
buddybleau 4 months ago
Fuck those pigs, making it seem like they're just doing their job.. They're going to get you use to this, than once you're use to it; it will be more often, than they're will arrest anyone because of their ethnicity.
Jx1x3 5 months ago
1st of all put more check points catch these drunk idiots! no limit... you don't understand how many people get killed or hurt as a result of the negligence of these individuals! wanna punk police go for the ones wasting time on bs tickets. Catch criminals not bull infractions! I think you doing something interesting but not valid on this subject. You go tell that to the families killed because of the DUI's
UsMcBaldie 5 months ago
Police can pull someone over for Resonable Suspicion
ChampsElysees100 6 months ago
@ChampsElysees100 this video has nothing to do with that its about checking everyone. second not only do they have to have probable cause they also have to have a warrant its in the constitution word for word they need both not just probable cause the laws on the book that say they only need probable cause are unconstitutional and therefore illegal because the constitution is the supreme law of the land.
foxtrot1162 4 months ago
YOU TALK SO MUCH CRAP!! YOU GET PAID DIRTY MONEY TO DO THIS I KNOW IT!! IT WILL NOT BENEFIT YOU SOON YOU WILL THINK BACK IN YOUR LIFE AND KNOW YOU ARE A DIRTY GROUP!! ITS OVER. YOUR TIME WILL COME ASWELL JUST LIKE GEDDAFI,SEDDAM,MOBAREK,BIN ALI, YEMEN PRESIDENT, SAUDI ARABIA, BESSHAR ASSAD. ALL BAD PEOPLE END THIS WAY. PREPARE YOURS!! DIRTS PEOPLE!! YOUR DISCUSSTING TOO LOOK AT AND YOU ARE STUPID PEOPLE. AMERICA AND EUROPE ARE 100% BETTER THAN YOU DIRTY PEOPLE ALL YOU TALK ABOUT IS RUBBISH
WorldFreeFreedom 6 months ago
Check points are a complete scam to extract money from Americans and violates their rights. Hard to believe these guys raised their right hand and swore to defend the Constitution. On another note, Whittier Police are corrupted pedophiles, thugs, and guys that cheat on their wives.
Someday there will be another Revolution and the police that have violated our rights for years will be in some sorry ass shape.
Kwicherbichen 7 months ago
who decides when your to drunk to drive , who made it .08 it was the stinking lawyers all drunk drivers who are dangerious have .10 or higher. this low was done to make money for the lawyers. wake up sheep your being butt fuc---
tomanyasses 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
best car insurance website online (- buyersbrokers. info -)
lamareaton358 7 months ago
WOW dude if you r going to attack the police with law questions get your FACTS straight first. Find the law where it says they need a warrant to conduct a DUI chk point so you don't look like and sound like a idiot. Really your busting their balls about something that should be done due to ppl are driving drunk and killing innocent ppl and their families. There are bad cops but there are good ones to so until you understand their job and what they go through from ppl
get your facts straight.
squirrel702 7 months ago 2
... it's not like i do this for a living.
netgrab 7 months ago 2
Looks like a cellphone video. May i suggest a full HD (1920x1080) camcorder? I use a Canon Vixia HF10. Works fantastic for Catching Police Corruption, especially at night.
I recommend it for all CopStoppers out there....
CopStoppers 7 months ago
the fool with the camera is just mad because after 9pm every other mexican driving is drunk
Blahblobify 7 months ago
@Blahblobify Fuck you
420SmokeDatHaze 6 months ago
is this on whittier blvd exit of the 605 N fwy?
MrSlim2024 7 months ago
I don't see what the problem with DUI checkpoints is, it is getting drunk drivers off the road. They have them here in New Zealand all the time, if your not drunk there is no problem.
bassetthound007 8 months ago
@bassetthound007 I see your point. So by your logic one should have no issues with the police searching your pockets while walking down the street or your home whenever the feel like it. After all, if you have nothing to hide then what's the big deal?
vaguy78 8 months ago
Our system of law dictates that there is only one way to remove a right belonging to the people. That is by a person knowingly waiving a particular right. Some of the confusion in our present system has arisen because many millions of people have waived their right to travel unrestricted, and opted into the jurisdiction of the state. Those who have knowingly given up these rights are legally regulated by state law, and must obtain permits, registrations, insurance, etc.
rclark23 8 months ago
Given the Constitutional implications in the matter, it turns on a Strict Scrutiny analysis. United States courts has reviewing standards of rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny is part of a hierarchy of standards employed by courts to weigh an asserted government interest against a constitutional right or principle that conflicts with the manner in which the interest is being pursued.
rclark23 8 months ago
combined powers of the general, and of a state government.” In Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530, 544-45 (1962), Justice Harlan asserted that Chief Justice Marshall in the Canter case “did not mean to imply that the case heard by the Key West court was not one of admiralty jurisdiction otherwise properly justiciable in a Federal District Court sitting in one of the States. All the Chief Justice meant . is that in the territories cases and controversies falling within the enumeration of
rclark23 8 months ago
defined in the 3rd article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress, in the execution of those general powers which that body possesses over the territories of the United States.” 26 U.S. at 546.The Court went on to hold that admiralty jurisdiction can be exercised in the States only in those courts which are established in pursuance of Article III, but that the same limitation does not apply to the territorial courts, for in legislating for them “Congress exercises the combined
rclark23 8 months ago
judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the general government, can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They are legislative courts, created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations, respecting the territory belonging to the United States. The jurisdiction, with which they are invested, is not a part of that judicial power which is defined in
rclark23 8 months ago
powers, and have comprised a significant part of the federal judiciary. The distinction between constitutional courts and legislative courts was first made in American Ins. Co. v. Canter 26 U.S. (1 Pet.) 511 (1828) which involved the question of the admiralty jurisdiction of the territorial court of Florida, the judges of which were limited to a four-year term in office.
Said Chief Justice Marshall for the Court:
“These courts, then, are not constitutional courts, in which the judicial power
rclark23 8 months ago
"It is needless to accumulate cases on this subject. Those already referred to, and the cases of Capron v. Van Noorden, in 2 Cr. 126, and Montalet v. Murray, 4 Cr. 46, are sufficient to show the rule of which we have spoken. The case of Capron v. Van Noorden strikingly illustrates the difference between a common law court and a court of the United States." Legislative courts, they are so-called because they are created by Congress in pursuance of its general legislative powers, and
rclark23 8 months ago
(2) Any vessel registered, licensed, or enrolled under the laws of the United States, and being on a voyage upon the waters of any of the Great Lakes, or any of the waters connecting them, or upon the Saint Lawrence River where the same constitutes the International Boundary Line. Statutes created by the U.S. Congress are constitutional for the purpose of its citizens and personnel and in the interest of the Public and Public Policy Law:
rclark23 8 months ago
and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State, and any vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof, or to any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, when such vessel is within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State.
rclark23 8 months ago
Here above the Supreme Court agrees with my firm position that Admiralty is the aggressive parent of maritime jurisdiction as will be further evidenced below: TITLE 18: PART I, CHAPTER 1§ 7. Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States defined The term “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States”, as used in this title, includes: (1) The high seas, any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,,,,,
rclark23 8 months ago
“It [The United States] exercises the discretionary power of a State Government in authorizing the establishment of a court in which the judges hold their appointments for a term of years only, and not during good behavior, and it exercises the power of the General Government in investing that court with admiralty jurisdiction, over which the General Government had exclusive jurisdiction in the Territory.” (Italics mine) (Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393. Id at pages: 445-446)
rclark23 8 months ago
lol i herd urt convo wiv alex jones....AWESOME stuff dude
Vmax786 8 months ago
Found this after watching some Alex Jones!!
freds3251 8 months ago
Love how at 6.59 the cop car slowly creeps back, Like there sussing him out lol
hussman101 8 months ago
i use to live in whittier california for more that 18 years this kind DUI check points been happening every 2 months with out warning every year since 1992 most all the time in whittier blv near withttier hospital
yomero66 8 months ago
Traulling for sheep! "money"
roxhanco 8 months ago
he was inducing terror into the cops head since he didnt know what he was talking about, man is so stupid he doesnt understand something he shoots it
ldog50 8 months ago
he probably didnt mention the constitution cause the officer would have given him a beating for being a terrorist
ldog50 8 months ago
Big ups to the infowarrior Felipe, make more videos! Bob Atkinson sounds like he doesn't really understand the issue at hand...the issue is NOT whether people are abusing their driving privileges. The issue is the gov't agencies from the city level all the way up to the federal level are effectively stripping us, the people, of our rights to privacy which is protected by the 4th amendment. We are protected by the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. AND YOU DO NEED A WARRANT LYING SCUM PIG!
OutOnBailProductionz 8 months ago
I would have told the cop straight up that he's violating the 4th Amendment.
n310ea 8 months ago
L.A. has had checkpoints since 1971 . If the u.s. was free . I never lived it in my lifetime . Seams to me thier pickin on whittier people ! Great video ......
deathofisrael 8 months ago
You go brother!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We need more citizens like you.
techboomyt 8 months ago
pardon my french but look at these cock suckin pigs, searchin through peoples trunks and shit with no probable cause, driver still sitting in his vehicle, what is this fucking counntry coming to , wake up people.........
whit6r160 8 months ago
solemoralityDOTcom/sobriety-checkpoints-and-the-fourth-amendment
th86stone 8 months ago
Wouldn't a drunk person see the check point and just turn around to avoid it?
lsl70 8 months ago
dude, if you're gonna confront the police like you did you NEED to know exactly what law it is you were unable to recite. i know you are right but saying to the leo that you know theres a law that demands a warrant doesnt cut it to an officer who seemed clueless. you were confronting them, next time have some paperwork with you so youre not left with your dick in the wind, seriously. applauding your balls though!
ivebeenrocked 8 months ago 3
and on top of the savings they make by not having to fix you! And by gaining more tax due to you being able to work, they also make money fining the people that break the so called law! Do you see a pattern here? It's about money! It's all bullshit! There only need be 3 laws! Don't harm anyone, don't cause anyone loss, and don't be fraudulent in your contracts! Now tell me a situation that can't be dealt with by these 3 laws!
snaz27 8 months ago
BloodyPooProductions... I think personally there is a huge difference between legal and lawful... Laws are universal, and have been around since recorded time, like murder and theft etc... The rest? This legal bullshit, is just that! Bullshit! They are only there to oppress, control and gain REVENUE! Example, seatbelt, you think the government gives a shit about you? They care about tax! They care about how much it will cost to fix you! So they force you to wear a seatbelt!
snaz27 8 months ago
Doesn't matter what you say, the US Supreme court said that DUI Roadblocks are constitutional and unless the US Supreme court makes a law for the US Supreme Court to overturn previous US Supreme court decisions, the law is legal. Besides, don't people have better things to worry about, like the Patriot Act?
BloodyPooProductions 8 months ago
@BloodyPooProductions The law to overturn is the first amendment prohibiting illegal search and seizure without probable cause.
suedonym0 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why is it illegal?
BloodyPooProductions 8 months ago
Same goes for any US citizen.
redventrue1 8 months ago
ALL police should be required to study some basic law & Gov't classes. If they are to serve the law they should know the law.
/Ignorance is no excuse.
redventrue1 8 months ago
omg, you don't know that 'law' is the fuckin CONSTITUTION?
quest847 8 months ago
was that a diet beverage the officer had? His brain is probably so ate up from aspartame its not worth your time asking him questions. Its a shame the folks we let protect and serve us, they will never solve any crime being so asleep.
carljosephcummings 8 months ago
@carljosephcummings Check the po-po cars in your area from now on. I'll bet you won't find a one of them that has that old "to protect and serve" on them... anywhere. They've all been federalized and work for big brother now.
4micaman 8 months ago
Philipe, the law you were referring to, that the cop kept asking you "what law?" is the Bill of Rights, man! The first 10 amendments to the Constitution for the United States of America! It states in part, that we are free from illegal search and seizure, the need for a warrant, etc. Next time, tell the cop it's not just a law, it's the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!....the 4th amendment to the Constitution! And it is superior to whatever some lower court decided in California.
PanhandlePatriot 8 months ago
... yeah... pretty much...
netgrab 8 months ago
netgrab, are Philipe?...the one who called in to Alex Jones today, Tuesday June 14, and spoke of this situation? The caller said he had video and that most people, including some cops weren't going along with this. Is this the video the caller (you?) referred to or is there more? Thanks. And good job, Patriot!
PanhandlePatriot 8 months ago
netgrab, are you the one who called in to Alex Jones today, Tuesday June 14, and spoke of this situation? The caller said he had video and that most people, including some cops weren't going along with this. Is this the video the caller referred to or is there more? Thanks.
PanhandlePatriot 8 months ago
I used to live in WHITTIER holy shit come to my channel.
Mr135223 8 months ago
Comment removed
Mr135223 8 months ago
Vote for Ron paul 2012 Property Rights. Freedom . Constitiution. Pass it on .
3hhubby 8 months ago 20
They are "abiding by the STATUTES and CODES"
NOT THE LAW!
The LAW is Constitution of the State of California! - NOT the STATUTES!
Learn the difference folks!
Regulations and Statutes are brought upon you by YOUR CONTRACT when you stupidly signed because you were "so scared".
Did you ask your government for permission to have a wife too? Yeah - you did - you signed a MARRIAGE LICENSE didn't you! You just stated on paper that your children are WARDS OF THE STATE.
Gawd people are so ...
anabusedman 8 months ago
Fact: Certificate of Origination on your vehicle is in the hands of the DMV. You do NOT own your cars - NO. The states own the "vehicles". You need a license to drive THEIR vehicle upon the public highways. The license is PERMISSION to perform an act which is normally illegal. Terms: Vehicle, Driving - they are legal terms.
Traveling on the public highways in a motor carriage does NOT require a license! You've ALL BEEN FOOLED BY CONTRACT!!
You signed your rights away!
Such a scam!
anabusedman 8 months ago 10
@anabusedman This is true!
TheRantanplan2009 8 months ago
@anabusedman
that's a load you are just making shit up
Blahblobify 7 months ago
@anabusedman
The state owns the vehicles? We don't?
WTF that's the stoopidest thing I've seen in awhile are you teh retartet?
Blahblobify 6 months ago
@Blahblobify
First of all, yes the State owns your vehicle. As well as your house. The proof is in the words "property taxation". Try not paying the State the tax (rent) on that property and you'll find the rightful owner taking it back!
Now, when you call me names and imply that I don't know what I'm talking about, you might want to use a Dictionary for the following words: "stupid" "the" "retarded".
anabusedman 6 months ago
@Blahblobify
Now go do some homework sunny before I slap you again. Who holds the Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin ? The DMV! Not you! And what is a License? Frankly put : A receipt of Permission to perform that which is normally illegal. Why would driving be illegal without it? Because it's NOT YOUR CAR DUDE! You only RENT IT! HAHAHAHAHA - Jokes on YOU! Wake up!
anabusedman 6 months ago
@anabusedman
God you are so full of shit.
Keep babbling, someone somewhere might think you are making sense.
The stse does not own the car dumbass, you can psychobabble all you want.
Blahblobify 6 months ago
@anabusedman I bought my car for three thousand dollars in 2006. Added a few things here and there and then sold it in 2008 for five thousand. How is it possible to modify and then sell something that you don't own and only rent and make a profit?
IbonedDerekDsister 6 months ago
Found ya from alex jones.
SEALofthefuture1962 8 months ago
I don't think this kid's quite ready for prime time - get your act together - and learn how to speak into a microphone.
bammbamm12 8 months ago
I live on the other side of the hill from Whittier....hey netgrab..what the hell man! When the cop asked you to show him the law you should have told him its the 4th amendment to the constitution and no law wether state or federal can supercede the constitution! Please be prepared next time you do something like this. It makes the asshole cops look smarter than us.
jaysonbuckley 8 months ago
in canada this is completely normal they do this shit every night, catching drunk drivers is fine, however i think that people trading freedom for complete safety is rediculous, enjoy your new found "life"
by the way i like the smug ass look on the cops face at the end. he is asking for the law which states there checkstop is legal yet somehow i don't think he himself knows it. DOUBLE FAIL
pattycr125 8 months ago
So much for the 4th amendment
garrethdavis 8 months ago
The scariest thing about this video is the cop at the end who asked you what law said he needs a warrant to search people's cars. He said something like "All I know is what I am doing is legal" He should have said "I don't really know anything. I do not think for myself. All I know is that I have been told that what I am doing is legal. I mean..do you know how many laws there are? (actually they are not "laws" just "rules" & "codes") I cannot understand all that..I just do as I am told
IMNumber6 8 months ago
this is mos def true...two things-its difficult, but if so many people do the wrong thing, then how can we save lives?? Funny, I never hear anyone, at concerts or gatherings, complain about being searched..we dont want beer bottles thrown at our heads, right? Yes, if they couldnt bust you for anything other than drunk driving, would be great...drunk driving is the worst possible..its death or maiming, looking for a place to land. I smoke herbage, I dont smoke like that either....peace
LauraStanDylan 8 months ago
BTW, you can get free purse-sized copies of the Constitution and Bill of Rights from The Heritage Foundation and ACLJ (American Center for Law & Justice). I'm not spamming. I just wonder how many American citizens have actually read the Bill of Rights. It's rapidly disappearing into ether.
mixedupjo 8 months ago
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 13. The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable seizures and
searches may not be violated; and a warrant may not issue except on
probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly
describing the place to be searched and the persons and things to be
seized.
IMNumber6 8 months ago
(cont)
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and
no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized."
(See next for California Bill of Rights)
IMNumber6 8 months ago
Heard you on the Alex Jones Show. Excellent video. More people need to do things like this. Please don't pay attention to the negative comments. Keep up the good work. I think we should all carry around a pocket constitution and bill of rights so we can just point to the rights that are getting violated and can use less time and energy with this bullshit :)
mistresscirce 8 months ago
You probably already thought of this but the next time you go to a checkpoint to check if the cops have a warrant and tell them they must have one to be acting legally, look up the law and commit it to memory.. I know you know it and under pressure (I'd be a bit nervous too telling a cop what he is doing is illegal) had a data -grid-lock in your head... I don't know where it is in the Ca Const. or BofR but it's the 4th Amend in the united States Constitution..."...no warrant shall issue ...
IMNumber6 8 months ago
AMENDMENT IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizuress, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED, and no Warrants shall issue, BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE, SUPPORTED BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION, AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING THE PLACE TO BE SEARCHED, AND THE PERSON OR THINGS TO BE SEIZED.
From the Bill of Rights. I didn't write it, I just quote it.
mixedupjo 8 months ago
What makes it legal is listed under the link. Go armed with the facts next time and ask the right questions as to whether they are doing it by the book. They don't need a warrant, but they need to still do it legally. Otherwise, it's time to get some new precedents from the courts to make California like the 12 states who uphold these checkpoint as unconstitutional.
alkilleu 8 months ago
Comment removed
alkilleu 8 months ago
Comment removed
alkilleu 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ht
tp://
californiaovertimerules.
com/holiday-dui-checkpoints-ar e-drunk-driving-checkpoints-le gal
alkilleu 8 months ago
Hey Felipe, I heard you on AJ's show. Good job confronting those guys (the cops) and ALONE too! Good idea keeping some distance in between. One little criticism, let that first man talk! He seemed to be the most educated in law and rights. The second guy seemed like his highest priority was getting along with everybody. ...another victim of PCS (politically correct syndrome) (continued on next coment)
IMNumber6 8 months ago
Cop 1 Netgrab 0.. Cmon man, before you go out there, you need to be prepared, do your homework.
vfratus 8 months ago