Added: 4 years ago
From: Protoguy1
Views: 13,258
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Man I love watching these guys

    

  • Ken cracked under pressure which is why he fails

  • I can tell Ken wasn't playing to the best of his ability here. As most of you said, his edgeguarding wasn't good. Also, his L cancel wasn't being done well either.

  • everyone was so terrible back then...

  • @Krusenik

    and you still couldn't beat them.

  • no johns everyone. pc won this match

  • @cablecho57 yeah pc won but ken could have played better. he made silly errors and didnt do simple things like L-Cancel. nothing against pc though cuz pc's one of my fav players but just stating the facts

  • ken made sum silleh mistaks this game

  • I liked the commentary xD

    They had to tell us what pillaring is lmfao

  • @maybe106 it is 06'...

  • This commentary... ugh. I'll have Phil and Waffles over them any day.

  • mlg is a joke

  • That Falco is one dirty bird...

  • I almost think that Ken was better than usual in this match. He didn't need to chaingrab at all and insteas relyed on spacing and his skill with Marth.

  • NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  • Ken counterpicked Yoshi's Story... and lost?

  • has anyone noticed that PC does better when he is blue falco

  • For some reason... ken seemed nervous this match. He's rushing everything.

    - Lazy on his edgehogging.

    - Getting grabbed from aerials that he isn't l cancelling properly.

    Playing in japan made him rusty against americans.

  • hmm i agree with some of the lazyness but really he seemed just as good. In fact he was trying to get a little creative, maybe a reason why he lost.

  • @TheGosu Japs > US

  • I've been in smash for about 3-4 years, but i still don't understand why they played 2 sets so and so matches. Anyone care to explain?

  • my guess would be grand finals with PC coming back from losers finals which means Ken has 0 losses (sets) so for PC to win he has to beat Ken twice.

  • in smash you play best of 5 so whoever gets 3 wins, is the winner

  • Ok homeboy i said "sets" best of 5 is one set. Ken and PC played 2 sets.

  • The person who went to grand finals from losers has to play 2 sets to win, while the person who went to grand finals from winners has to win 1 set.

  • "Fantasian move, or whatever its traditionally called"

    LMFAO x9000

  • god that commentator is so dumb.

  • ken made too many mistakes

  • I thought Ken would win until the very last second of this match :O

  • As did I. XD

  • pc ftw!

  • Ah, I see what you're talking about now. LOL. sorry. disregard last message.

  • that IS pillaring. pillaring = eating away at an opponent's shield. All the combos falco does with his shine attack are supposed to be referred to as just shine combos, but because everyone's always wrong, they call THAT pillaring instead

  • I think that the misnomer is so common that both moves are called pillaring, and the name is generally accepted.

  • god these commentators are retarded, that's not what pillaring is at all

  • Who cares, it's entertaining.

  • You can do better commentary? Show us, but until then, don't tell anyone they suck.

  • Although it is pretty useless for people who already know what's going on, its nice for people who are new to Smash. I remember enjoying the commentaries and learning new things from them when I was new to smash and first started watching pro matches.

  • there's one big reason why I disagree, even if you know what's going on, sometimes you might not catch everything, or know the previous history and track record these players have versus each other and the stages and characters they choose.

  • ouch, that suicide cost him the match

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more