There Is No way In hell the jet Impact could knock off all the fire proofing, scrapped It off yes but Not knocked It off. More likely an explosion done It.
Respond to this video... Immediately after 9/11 the conventional wisdom was that the jet fuel had melted the steel. NBC, CNN, NOVA, Fox News, and BBC all said so, and quoted a variety of "experts" on the subject. Of course this was nonsense. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. For more information see my video: The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
But it was not melted. The demonstrated piece still looks intact even though the protecting cover is missing.
Anyway this piece either was:
1. blown out directly by the crash -> then it is not appropriate for discussion about effects of fire inside the WTC.
2. a part of structure inside WTC where damage and fire were at highest rate -> then one should wonder why it is not melted, as officially stated, and still intact
3. any piece from anywhere -> then it does not explain anything
Evidence of CD, but let's redirect to other BS.....
High speed slurry of debris and gasses from explosive charges scrubbed surface of beams, removed fire-proofing, left particular patterns of concrete remaining from floors, left blast pattern in rust proofing paint, left deformed shapes in steel, etc. Evidence evidence everywhere, some in microscopic details like micro cratering on steel surfaces.
What a paid shill. Steel was extremely vulnerable from the heat of the kerosene? First off, most of the kerosene, if not all , burned up on impact. Hence the big fireball. Secondly, there was no raging inferno, just a lot of smoke, indicating an oxygen deprived cool burn. Bombs brought the towers down.
@demigodlike All of the reports state the steel was heated to 250 degrees (C). Even most conspiracy believers accept that this is accurate. What many people do not understand is that at 250 degrees (C) steel loses 20% of it's strength.
Hypothetically is you had a 100 ton building built to support 110 tons and it lost 20% of it's strength what would happen? It would collapse because it can now only support 88 tons.
Also- concidering that everything inside the towers was pulverised in to small peices (even if it was only because of the force of all the collapsing material being mashed together during the collapse rather than fron explosives detonating) it would be quite unexpected to find much fireproofing left on anything. Out of the whole collapse it seems that pretty much the only thing left was stripped and twisted metal pieces that had been scourged by all the collapsing material.
(due to the collapse) "it would be quite unexpected to find much fireproofing left on anything"
So why is this Indian guy (they were out of Himalayan cats on that day, I guess) pretending it all happened at impact and making a big deal out of that?
This is for a large part bullshit, for one kerosene does not "explode" and dent 1-2" thick low-span steel surfaces, it would hell-no glaze any mineral fiber to the steel, and heating this thick steel to any dangerous temperatures takes a long time.
i agree.... this indian guy is paid by us goverment to tell disinformation... shure is the steel bended where the plane crash ,but not as much that 3 buildings would collaps....
Seems reasonable that numerous experts figured this out, early on. News accounts seem to show they figured out the collapse mechanisms because of high expertise.
Why was all of the steel immediately melted down. Could they not have held on to it for a few months to be further examined by the people that built the WTC to lose all doubt of a further conspiracy.
The steel was kept in New Jersey until May 2002. The conspiracy morons obviously don't do any research. Just a bunch of speculations. They see the steel being shipped off and to them that automatically means it was going to be shipped off. Bullshit!!!
aaah. "ok". Now YOU explain why they used less money on investigating the crime scene than the f**in dress of Lewinsky. And explain WHEN they started researching that steel and HOW MUCH resources they put into it and WHY. btw, what the F*CK do YOU know about how much steel that was shipped off and _when_ it was shipped off??? and WHO told you so??? moron indeed! Now go read PHYSICS you retard!
There Is No way In hell the jet Impact could knock off all the fire proofing, scrapped It off yes but Not knocked It off. More likely an explosion done It.
ortafunk 1 month ago
At 0:48 - 'most likely' came from WTC2?
Apparently this man is making it up as he goes...
proudfootz 4 months ago
Respond to this video... Immediately after 9/11 the conventional wisdom was that the jet fuel had melted the steel. NBC, CNN, NOVA, Fox News, and BBC all said so, and quoted a variety of "experts" on the subject. Of course this was nonsense. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. For more information see my video: The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
punxsutawneybarney 8 months ago 2
But it was not melted. The demonstrated piece still looks intact even though the protecting cover is missing.
Anyway this piece either was:
1. blown out directly by the crash -> then it is not appropriate for discussion about effects of fire inside the WTC.
2. a part of structure inside WTC where damage and fire were at highest rate -> then one should wonder why it is not melted, as officially stated, and still intact
3. any piece from anywhere -> then it does not explain anything
dugall1 1 year ago
@dugall1 so what sort of expertise do you have in your experience to make such suggestions?
forugh3 5 months ago
AND YOU AMERICANts THINK YOU LIVE IN "THE LAND OF THE FREE???"
MrChizzy2k 1 year ago
Evidence of CD, but let's redirect to other BS.....
High speed slurry of debris and gasses from explosive charges scrubbed surface of beams, removed fire-proofing, left particular patterns of concrete remaining from floors, left blast pattern in rust proofing paint, left deformed shapes in steel, etc. Evidence evidence everywhere, some in microscopic details like micro cratering on steel surfaces.
guesswhotoo6 1 year ago
I seriously don't know what it proves? Can't find any plausible theory except for shape charges inside the building. What a mess.....
JJTechnologies 1 year ago
Fire proof material can be also blown away by schock waves, created by explosive charges.
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago
Explosion was the wrong word. He appears to have meant "impact," the planes hitting the building.
The professor speaks English much better than I speak my second language, but not perfectly.
Skeptic121 1 year ago
What a paid shill. Steel was extremely vulnerable from the heat of the kerosene? First off, most of the kerosene, if not all , burned up on impact. Hence the big fireball. Secondly, there was no raging inferno, just a lot of smoke, indicating an oxygen deprived cool burn. Bombs brought the towers down.
demigodlike 1 year ago
@demigodlike All of the reports state the steel was heated to 250 degrees (C). Even most conspiracy believers accept that this is accurate. What many people do not understand is that at 250 degrees (C) steel loses 20% of it's strength.
Hypothetically is you had a 100 ton building built to support 110 tons and it lost 20% of it's strength what would happen? It would collapse because it can now only support 88 tons.
MrAwsome514 4 months ago
Also- concidering that everything inside the towers was pulverised in to small peices (even if it was only because of the force of all the collapsing material being mashed together during the collapse rather than fron explosives detonating) it would be quite unexpected to find much fireproofing left on anything. Out of the whole collapse it seems that pretty much the only thing left was stripped and twisted metal pieces that had been scourged by all the collapsing material.
iandeeightiesman 3 years ago
Bet it wasn't hard to find a piece of blasted steel...there was so much of it.
Freedomlover911 3 years ago
(due to the collapse) "it would be quite unexpected to find much fireproofing left on anything"
So why is this Indian guy (they were out of Himalayan cats on that day, I guess) pretending it all happened at impact and making a big deal out of that?
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
This is for a large part bullshit, for one kerosene does not "explode" and dent 1-2" thick low-span steel surfaces, it would hell-no glaze any mineral fiber to the steel, and heating this thick steel to any dangerous temperatures takes a long time.
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
i agree.... this indian guy is paid by us goverment to tell disinformation... shure is the steel bended where the plane crash ,but not as much that 3 buildings would collaps....
55758 2 years ago
Seems reasonable that numerous experts figured this out, early on. News accounts seem to show they figured out the collapse mechanisms because of high expertise.
jamesrobert2 3 years ago
Why was all of the steel immediately melted down. Could they not have held on to it for a few months to be further examined by the people that built the WTC to lose all doubt of a further conspiracy.
This is why I don't believe you.
dumblarryleroy 4 years ago
They even hosed the pieces down before shipping it, and had armed gueards keeping watch over any scrap from the WTC site as far as I understand it..
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
The steel was kept in New Jersey until May 2002. The conspiracy morons obviously don't do any research. Just a bunch of speculations. They see the steel being shipped off and to them that automatically means it was going to be shipped off. Bullshit!!!
AmericasFan 3 years ago
aaah. "ok". Now YOU explain why they used less money on investigating the crime scene than the f**in dress of Lewinsky. And explain WHEN they started researching that steel and HOW MUCH resources they put into it and WHY. btw, what the F*CK do YOU know about how much steel that was shipped off and _when_ it was shipped off??? and WHO told you so??? moron indeed! Now go read PHYSICS you retard!
gunthaarz 3 years ago
Convenient that he is not looking at the support beams that were cut by thermite, or the pools of molten metal that contain sulfer residue.
techsprite 4 years ago 2
Very dubious observations and conclusions at best.
stone1home 4 years ago 2