I don't understand how a president in the feauture can posibly to deside to drop a hydrogen bomb on a country when it has never been tested and its affects studied
But I will say this, at least that books principle meaning is peace and unity, opposed to the sheer malevolence of the bible
If you think otherwise, then your an idiot, the crazy terrorist jihad doctrine isn't part of the quran. It's no different then domestic terrorism attacks wherein American's kill their own because of the bible.
Crazy nutjob fuckfaces everywhere in the world no racial boundaries to insanity.
It's part of the complete package of a proper WMD, music is.
Bioweapons have screeching violins as you put the contaminated food in your math. Chemical weapons have 1940's "tragedy" string serenades as people fall down unable to breathe or move. Atomic weapons have orchestral complements of scifi "wonder" music as the reaction clouds blossom into the air.
They're still looking for a weapon to put rap music to, I heard from a friend in the top secret division.
@trombonbe42288 rap cant go good with anything. metal will go great with anything, just look up "fight fire with fire" by metallica and "blackened" also by metallica. best fucking nuclear holocaust songs ive ever heard and vary descriptive.
@ISpeakTrue Stupid people like you are the reason why blacks - latinos - arabs - europeans - chinesses ... Everyone including americans dont like the united states and the so called '' Americans ''
@Sheri451 It is said that John Wayne was filming a movie called "The Conqueror" in the Nevada Desert, in an area later determined to have been contaminated by fallout from an unexpected wind shift, hours after a test detonation. He, director Howard Hughes, and a significant number of the cast and crew all died of various forms of Cancer over the next 30 years.
@EMS8643 i was told by my history professor that he was filming there to show that there was nothin to be scared of but the cancer thing is the same as what he said
2000 tested nuclear missiles on earth Does any one feel any safer
First it was the native Indians that were called the red skin devils by the American Government,Then it was the Japanese turn ,then it was Russia's turn to be public enemy number one.And now the latest American made public Enemy is a dude hiding in mountains 8000 km from anywhere...
@FrickaFreshTV there is a huge problem with people - and nukes - i know this has been said before - but it seems like super powers forget what they do
Truly Terrifying, not to be overly dramatic but when those bombs detonate it is like the gates to hell are opened. But take heart no matter how devastating they might be it will take alot of them to destroy life :)
true true the Earth is a big place. Plus they will probably never be used again, after the whole cold war thing. Now we get to wait for the next WMD type! Goody!
@goodygoody23 You DO KNOW that the "Cold War" was all a sham to scare the populace, hey?
And 9/11 was a controlled incident, designed to ensure that defense contractors would have something to do. The list of people that invested big money in General Dynamics and such 18 months before 9/11 is Top Secret, and a Black Squad would make you or I disappear if we made a fuss about our FOI request being ignored on that matter.
@xxxMrSuspendedxxx Oh and things like the korean war, vietnam war, cuban missile crisis and russias little affair in afganistan were all made up to scare us? Those proxie wars were all part of the cold war. So I wouldnt say the cold war was all a sham. As for your theory on 911 that has so many flaws its not even worth going into.
@xxxMrSuspendedxxx the entire city? think realisticly, though a few seconds difference is not the point. And I feel bad for you, that you bought into the bullshit of conspiracy theories
Makes me think we're a bunch of wusses... People make an atomic bomb to kill hundres of thousands when we send hundreds of thousands of people to go to that war. 8) Bringing a stick of dynamite to a gun fight.
This was the largest pure fission bomb ever detonated. 500 kilotons. This was one of those weapons designs like many others that never got passed the development stage. It was never used in our nuclear stockpile.
Nope. If they are more than 10 miles away then no serious direct radiation reaches them. Fallout is another story, but I'm sure they knew the wind is not blowing towards them.
At lot of them are all dead of cancer but ironically it was mostly caused by copious cigarette smoking that was at a height of popularity in the 1950's.
Back then everyone was rightly paranoid about radiation so every precaution was taken to stay separated from radioactive fallout. But in the end Marlbro killed more people with cancer than any nuclear test.
becuse whidout nucler weapons the soviet EU and the Usa would probly still be fighting one a nother if me englisch is bad and you think i mean that they once did i dont! What i mean is that world war 2 would newer have ended. And if it did it would only be for about 3 years.
and be that i mean that whidout nucler bombs 2 make the soviet just sitting there they would have invaded EU. Ofcourse they would newer win but we would probly still be fighting that war
He is absolutely right! Stalin never trusted the allies in Europe as we never fully trusted him. Patton was the only one who, in my opinion, saw it right. He thought that we should have immediately attacked the Russians and driven those Bolshevik bastards back to where they came from. Instead we got stuck with the Sov's taking eastern Europe for the better part of 50 years and trillions of dollars and rubles spent facing each other off during the cold war!!!!!
That detonation is Ivy King which was the largest "fission" bomb ever tested. It used oralloy and had a yield of 500kt. Needless to say fusion weapons got far more bang for thebuck than this weapon.
Oraenx you may think that the mushroom cloud is part of the detonation process but its not the detonation is like any explosive detonation near instantanious the mushroom cloud is after the fact if you see that cloud then its too late the device has been detonated and you better be at MSD 30 miles or better would be my guess
dude, its actualy extremely fast but from the standpoint from which the camera is filming it seems that the blast radius expands really slowly but its really expanding at astonishing speeds.
A nuclear war wouldn't necessarily end our world...One nuke or two two major cities could cause unconditional surrender by the other side. And, a nuclear war has smaller chances of occuring due to the fear of environmental problems and retaliation problems for the attacking side.
notice tthat after the bomb exploded the sky became darker? and the airaround the explosion had ripples in it.. the pushing out of sound waves or particles from the area of impact?
Well, the sky didn't literally become darker ... it's just the way the film exposure changes because of the variance in contrast from the explosion. Whip out your cellphone camera and aim it at the wall, and then a light ... you'll see the same effect at work.
If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. I am become death the shatterer of worlds
Are'nt there hundres of old women called the mothers of the plaza de mayo, who march around to this day trying to find out what the Argentinian government did to their kids? And yes, the Japanese WERE trying to build their own A-bomb. They were not, and are not, saints. And neither are Argentinians
I'm talking as a citizen of the world. That's ok, my country is a shame, but we don´t kill people like a national sport...Hiroshima, Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan...Do I continue?
chances are that the invasion would have never happened, however, tactics would have changed to destroying railroads. The 1946 rice year was far below average (rations in Tokyo fell to 1012 calories a day) and destroyed railroads would have caused starvation. Its thought that Jap. might have surrendered in a few weeks but the USSR was planning to invade. This could have caused a second front for the Cold War. Now the USA and USSR would fight over Berlin AND Tokyo. Could have caused nuclear war.
Unfortunately when you see the unmistakable blinding flash you have barely a second to save your life, you can't run a mile away in that time, impossible.
The point is these "duck and cover" exercises would not save everyone but if everyone took cover millions of lives could be saved.
Lessons learn from The Blitz also showed that any advice is better than the government remaining silent on the issue and letting speculation and fear spread like wild fire.
Nuclear war is unlikely to "end the world" as the planet has gone through far worse catastrophes than this and life prevailed, humanity is particularly fickle due to our prevalence and preparations.
The perfect example is Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mainly how those cities still even exists! About 50% of the population survived a direct strike and though that is a "glass half full" perspective even a 25% survival rate gives an incentive to fight to survive rather than give up.
This Ivy King test of the Mk 18 bomb with a yield of 500Kt is quite representative of the current US, Russian, British and Chinese nuclear arsenal: as the majority of those bombs have yields of only 300-400Kt.
A 400Kt detonation at optimum altitude will destroy about 66 squ km but that will not completely destroy a typical city that is 400km2 in size. Hundreds of thousands may die but most of the population would survive.
And the cities wouldn't even be the main targets but the military bases.
We'd handle the survivors just like Japan did, with great difficulty. Remember, 2 cities were nuked but virtually every other Japanese city was destroyed to the same extent by Le May's fire-bombing tactics. A little known fact is the fire-bombed cities suffered higher casualties than the nuclear attacks.
The grizzly fact is people die in their habitation so though less housing, there are also less people.
But the immediate fallout is not as bad as you would expect from a typical air burst...
A typical air-burst of a 400Kt weapon the fission generates a lot of radioactive by products as well as neutron irradiation of the whole bomb and the surrounding air but this amounts to a relatively small amount of very fine radioactive fallout and being so hot is mostly propelled up into the upper atmosphere where it slowly falls at low risk levels.
This was why the outskirts of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were habitable afterwards with little residual radiation.
Large fallout could be created by a megaton range thermonuclear bomb (large fusion stage) detonating on the surface where the fireball creates a large crater and draws up tons of pulverised rock and soil into the mushroom cloud. Tons of this material is irradiated by neutrons from fusion that falls downwind like volcanic ash within a few hours. See Castle Bravo.
But Surface Detonation were only for use against remote missile silos and is not even used by most nuclear powers any more.
From Civil Defence documentation on all the likely targets; military bases and silos first, then infrastructure (electricity/fuel/water), then ports like San Fransisco.
But the politicians were Tertiary priority, only a general attack on the capitol to disrupt unity.
I know Strategic Air Command don't operate from a bunker but from a plane as it can "hide" in the large skies. Executive branch would also probably operate from Air Force One then finally retiring to a secret location.
nato and whatevers left of the u.s. launchen retalitory strikes againdt iran, meanwhile pakistan and india are exchanging, then north korea says "might as well" launches strikes at south korea etc.....china launches theres at japan, nepal etc. continued...
people who are "lucky" to survive the blast (yea right pfft lucky) would have to face a worldwide free-for-all while trying not to lose to radiation poisoning
I don't like your attitude saying you are better off to die than live.
Every year thousands of people brave radiation sickness over death when they undergo radiotherapy to treat cancer. The treatment is worse than the disease but people do it because when if comes down to it PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO DIE.
There is nothing lucky or fortunate about dying, it is the worst thing that can happen to you.
So stop ridiculing attempt by governments and individuals to reduce fatalities.
For one thing there is no guarantee I would die, the slightest radiation exposure is NOT a death sentence. Especially with basic treatments and precautions.
The overwhelming majority of people killed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were killed by blast and burn injuries, not radiation poisoning. This was due to the air-burst where the fireball didn't touch the ground.
It is this IGNORANT attitude that breeds panic that could lead to thousands of pointless suicides in the case of a nuclear attack.
I came here for the footage, but I stayed for the music (Oh, the footage too)
8thwonderlemon 2 weeks ago
I'm afraid we'll all forget 9-11 soon..
FirstPersonShitter 2 weeks ago
The music makes it a little bit more scary ;o
esther11995 2 weeks ago
I don't understand how a president in the feauture can posibly to deside to drop a hydrogen bomb on a country when it has never been tested and its affects studied
gatorboy530 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and so.. chuck norris was born.
MrNitroG3 2 weeks ago
These weapons shouldn't be allowed to exist.
RawRib 2 weeks ago
This was the biggest Atom bomb ever let off, 500 kilotonne. Anything bigger involves a thermonuclear weapon.
SvenTviking 2 weeks ago
press 5 for unlimited ammo
komaki119 3 weeks ago
Booooooom
davekallestad 1 month ago
why
rooneyohyes1 6 months ago
OMG! A musical a-bomb!
eluap 7 months ago 2
@eluap In the key of "A".
PopppaBlue59 6 months ago
so they wanna kill people by loud music from a bomb ,, hmm okay
dreakheart 7 months ago
oh jeez i couldnt hold it in i had to fart
bbuch23 8 months ago
that's ridiculous
deekon52 8 months ago
Boom... real estate.
tandemkgsd 8 months ago
Should drop one of those on Iraq and bring are troops home and stop wasting tax dollars. thumbs up if you agree
Irnwkr28 9 months ago
Oh god oh man oh god oh man oh god oh man!
TommyViolet 9 months ago
Yep pretty stupid.
Amisare1Waswere 9 months ago
We have twoo choys , the good or the bad technologie look in the Bibel
LucMoustache1 10 months ago
@LucMoustache1
I'll nuke the bible, and all the silly characters in it
mdma4life 10 months ago
@mdma4life and the qur'an and all other bullshit books..
royalarctic 7 months ago
@royalarctic
Yeah of course i'd nuke the Qu'ran thugh
But I will say this, at least that books principle meaning is peace and unity, opposed to the sheer malevolence of the bible
If you think otherwise, then your an idiot, the crazy terrorist jihad doctrine isn't part of the quran. It's no different then domestic terrorism attacks wherein American's kill their own because of the bible.
Crazy nutjob fuckfaces everywhere in the world no racial boundaries to insanity.
mdma4life 7 months ago
absolutely beautiful
20bdl00 10 months ago
@chessie2003
It's part of the complete package of a proper WMD, music is.
Bioweapons have screeching violins as you put the contaminated food in your math. Chemical weapons have 1940's "tragedy" string serenades as people fall down unable to breathe or move. Atomic weapons have orchestral complements of scifi "wonder" music as the reaction clouds blossom into the air.
They're still looking for a weapon to put rap music to, I heard from a friend in the top secret division.
trombonbe42288 10 months ago
@trombonbe42288 rap cant go good with anything. metal will go great with anything, just look up "fight fire with fire" by metallica and "blackened" also by metallica. best fucking nuclear holocaust songs ive ever heard and vary descriptive.
DRcaprice 10 months ago
@trombonbe42288
DONT be silly now, the weapon you're thinking of is the held-sideways-or-upsidedown-even automatic pistol variant, that's the rap "music" weapon.
mikester1290 8 months ago
and they do all that in here :(
c0ssu1 10 months ago
It sure did look like a skull.CRAZY!!!!!!
TheEspada23 11 months ago
did you see the fish no well that cuz they all dead
XXXintervention 1 year ago
anyone see the skull in the mushy cloud?
tatunkha 1 year ago
magic mushrooms
pointreyes6 1 year ago
TIME-TO-GO
LastCaress7 1 year ago
my father was on Eniwetok for some of these blasts
ChannelingusXIV 1 year ago
Comment removed
ISpeakTrue 1 year ago
@ISpeakTrue
How about we start with you and your family first....
AVIATIO 1 year ago 8
@AVIATIO Dont even try to understand people like ISpeakTRue...This guy is just a quite frustrated lifeless neo nazi
danielll43 1 year ago
@ISpeakTrue Stupid people like you are the reason why blacks - latinos - arabs - europeans - chinesses ... Everyone including americans dont like the united states and the so called '' Americans ''
MrLatinGamer 1 year ago
Comment removed
ISpeakTrue 1 year ago
DUCK AND COVER
senialgoat6789 1 year ago
I want one for new years eve!
XNeo27564 1 year ago
i felt the shock wave
youbmarios 1 year ago
That was like comparing a firecracker to case of dynamyte. The Ivy phase test was an H-bomb of like 10 megatons.
TheZepmeister 1 year ago
GODZILLA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
voiceofelijah2012 1 year ago
is this how the grand canyon was made? :P
DionNL95 1 year ago
0:21 moron how stupid can u be?
nickster2230 1 year ago
2011: Aya Hirano murdered. Otakus out of control. Violence does not subside.
2012: Obama- 'Time to finish what we started.'
EltBerserker 1 year ago
truly amazing
shawno4201 1 year ago
holyshit.......
nikojay1997 1 year ago
How many of those assholes died from radiation poisioning?
Sheri451 1 year ago
@Sheri451 It is said that John Wayne was filming a movie called "The Conqueror" in the Nevada Desert, in an area later determined to have been contaminated by fallout from an unexpected wind shift, hours after a test detonation. He, director Howard Hughes, and a significant number of the cast and crew all died of various forms of Cancer over the next 30 years.
EMS8643 1 year ago
@EMS8643 i was told by my history professor that he was filming there to show that there was nothin to be scared of but the cancer thing is the same as what he said
bobwatters 1 year ago
@Sheri451: Probably none. The number who have throughout all the US testing probably amount to less than a dozen.
puncheex 2 months ago
Every time a nuke goes off, somewhere an orchestra hits a crescendo.
damaged01 1 year ago 23
@damaged01 It's a mandatory thing, like free coffee at work.
TIMPANIMAN1 3 weeks ago
Lindo.
OCesarruivo 1 year ago
At least they played appropriate music-they could have played the theme from 'Whats Happening' and that would be...weird.
mrtomcollinz 1 year ago
2000 tested nuclear missiles on earth Does any one feel any safer
First it was the native Indians that were called the red skin devils by the American Government,Then it was the Japanese turn ,then it was Russia's turn to be public enemy number one.And now the latest American made public Enemy is a dude hiding in mountains 8000 km from anywhere...
nebulasxtv 1 year ago 2
@chessie2003 i know right!!
rebecca44132 1 year ago
were all gonna die
hunggakungfu 1 year ago
America brings death and destruction everywhere it sticks its dirty and evil foot.
AlexBrasil123123 1 year ago
@chessie2003 rofl!
xxxMrSuspendedxxx 1 year ago
retarted. mushroom clouds scare me.
FrickaFreshTV 1 year ago
@FrickaFreshTV there is a huge problem with people - and nukes - i know this has been said before - but it seems like super powers forget what they do
hunggakungfu 1 year ago
@hunggakungfu i know rite? there is a piont in it, but they also need to calm down with the explosives, its just a bit to much wreckage lol.
FrickaFreshTV 1 year ago
@chessie2003 Its the one thing the commies could never figure out. lol
Fatmann55 1 year ago
How many times have I told you, don't play with subatomic particles!
gmcg923 1 year ago
mah teevee sploded
reviathon360 1 year ago
when they knock the world of its axis theyl know all about it
TheClassifiedMan 1 year ago
What if that was dropped on a city? Hard to think about
goodygoody23 1 year ago
@goodygoody23
Not that hard really, look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the bombings just make the zero zone larger and you´ll get the same terrible result
Weepingadaras 1 year ago
but imagine New York or LA being wiped out in half a minute. Its terrifying
goodygoody23 1 year ago
Truly Terrifying, not to be overly dramatic but when those bombs detonate it is like the gates to hell are opened. But take heart no matter how devastating they might be it will take alot of them to destroy life :)
Weepingadaras 1 year ago
true true the Earth is a big place. Plus they will probably never be used again, after the whole cold war thing. Now we get to wait for the next WMD type! Goody!
goodygoody23 1 year ago
@goodygoody23 You DO KNOW that the "Cold War" was all a sham to scare the populace, hey?
And 9/11 was a controlled incident, designed to ensure that defense contractors would have something to do. The list of people that invested big money in General Dynamics and such 18 months before 9/11 is Top Secret, and a Black Squad would make you or I disappear if we made a fuss about our FOI request being ignored on that matter.
xxxMrSuspendedxxx 1 year ago
@xxxMrSuspendedxxx Oh and things like the korean war, vietnam war, cuban missile crisis and russias little affair in afganistan were all made up to scare us? Those proxie wars were all part of the cold war. So I wouldnt say the cold war was all a sham. As for your theory on 911 that has so many flaws its not even worth going into.
IronManOfficialguy 1 year ago
@goodygoody23 1/2 minute? Try 1 1/2 seconds, maybe, okay?
xxxMrSuspendedxxx 1 year ago
@xxxMrSuspendedxxx the entire city? think realisticly, though a few seconds difference is not the point. And I feel bad for you, that you bought into the bullshit of conspiracy theories
goodygoody23 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The world needs more nuclear weapons!
NuclearWorldOrder 1 year ago
Thanks a lot for this idiots, im shure the people of the bikini atoll would have voted against this bullshit.
michlerinator 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Makes me think we're a bunch of wusses... People make an atomic bomb to kill hundres of thousands when we send hundreds of thousands of people to go to that war. 8) Bringing a stick of dynamite to a gun fight.
Catastraphecdv 2 years ago
Comment removed
Catastraphecdv 2 years ago
This was the largest pure fission bomb ever detonated. 500 kilotons. This was one of those weapons designs like many others that never got passed the development stage. It was never used in our nuclear stockpile.
rare12inchsingles 2 years ago 3
hahaha love what we are doing to the planet no tree hugary meant
PBguy127 2 years ago 7
love how they always put music in almost everything in old american footage
1mcool 2 years ago 49
@1mcool Where was Ronald Regan with the Lucky Strike ad?
xxxMrSuspendedxxx 1 year ago
@1mcool
nothing has changed in the present day.
TheRagingHardon 1 year ago
hahahahahahaha lmao nice one
vini0120 2 years ago 3
I'll bet those guys watching the bomb are all dead of cancer.
Pinballpete007 2 years ago
Nope. If they are more than 10 miles away then no serious direct radiation reaches them. Fallout is another story, but I'm sure they knew the wind is not blowing towards them.
kalisz1974 2 years ago
WAY then !!!!
leanrio 2 years ago
@Pinballpete007
At lot of them are all dead of cancer but ironically it was mostly caused by copious cigarette smoking that was at a height of popularity in the 1950's.
Back then everyone was rightly paranoid about radiation so every precaution was taken to stay separated from radioactive fallout. But in the end Marlbro killed more people with cancer than any nuclear test.
Treblaine 2 years ago 11
imagine a hidrogen bomb mixed with that bomb. thatll be the last of any thing on its path
ReconMaster280 2 years ago
if they made a bomb like that back then imagine what they can make now,a big bang that would swoosh all the clouds around the area away.=\
zerosk8ter9 2 years ago
Don't forget your Ray Ben!
jekke1980 2 years ago
watching these nuclear test videos makes me feel like weeping. So much potential destruction left for our sons and daughters to suffer.
TheDurstmann 2 years ago 3
You Sir clearly dont know history!
becuse whidout nucler weapons the soviet EU and the Usa would probly still be fighting one a nother if me englisch is bad and you think i mean that they once did i dont! What i mean is that world war 2 would newer have ended. And if it did it would only be for about 3 years.
and be that i mean that whidout nucler bombs 2 make the soviet just sitting there they would have invaded EU. Ofcourse they would newer win but we would probly still be fighting that war
hietala8 2 years ago 2
Good Answer.
SiliconBong 2 years ago
The Soviets would have invaded the EU. Do tell us more about history, hietala8!
jtinaustralia 2 years ago
On On March 25, 1957 EU was born.
So yes they would have unless of nukes making them afraid of Ragnarök. (End of the world.)
I can cleary see that you think im an idiot saying EU was around at that time but then why is there all these documents saying it was born 1957?
Or mabye your just one of them hippies that have no ide how the world realy works?
Or mabye your just one of them normal americans who have no ide what history or any thing realy is?
hietala8 2 years ago
He is absolutely right! Stalin never trusted the allies in Europe as we never fully trusted him. Patton was the only one who, in my opinion, saw it right. He thought that we should have immediately attacked the Russians and driven those Bolshevik bastards back to where they came from. Instead we got stuck with the Sov's taking eastern Europe for the better part of 50 years and trillions of dollars and rubles spent facing each other off during the cold war!!!!!
sakoshooter48 2 years ago 2
i know it sucks
somekid93229 2 years ago
Watching these nuclear test videos makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
alilthia 2 years ago
Destroy these bombs...
matsharma 2 years ago
soon these bombs will save us =)
runehq521 2 years ago
Save us from what?
IxoZ 2 years ago 2
hmmm WHAT DO U THNIK?! TERROST!
runehq521 2 years ago
from alien invasion
nisimgarame123 2 years ago
Destroy or disarm??? Disarming is better I think...
DirkDirk1983 2 years ago
why they are wearing the maskes????
papaGimis22 2 years ago
because of the light flash that the bomb makes
pieplicht 2 years ago
No one... is surviving that.
gamewinner1728 2 years ago
Holly shit...
filadapenca 2 years ago
jap... this will destroy the world...
Volcomrider2207 2 years ago 2
That detonation is Ivy King which was the largest "fission" bomb ever tested. It used oralloy and had a yield of 500kt. Needless to say fusion weapons got far more bang for thebuck than this weapon.
Jospehporta 2 years ago
Thats Like a Kamahamaha
dezer11 2 years ago
not a king just a tatical nuke
ignaciojork 2 years ago
Oraenx you may think that the mushroom cloud is part of the detonation process but its not the detonation is like any explosive detonation near instantanious the mushroom cloud is after the fact if you see that cloud then its too late the device has been detonated and you better be at MSD 30 miles or better would be my guess
Sodiumreactor 2 years ago
Wow, that is a city killer.
Ragnarok691 2 years ago
scary shit..
BastardViking 2 years ago
yield?
transdrole 2 years ago
500 kilotons, all from fission.
DSCH4 2 years ago
Do Nukes detonate that slow or is it that they always slow the film speed down for dramatic effect?
Oraenxienael 2 years ago
It is that slow
DJFanatiq 2 years ago
dude, its actualy extremely fast but from the standpoint from which the camera is filming it seems that the blast radius expands really slowly but its really expanding at astonishing speeds.
samsam481 2 years ago
read a physics or calculus book geez.......
Relative speed is the speed of one object with respect to a frame of reference in which the other object is at rest.
radix10 2 years ago
A nuclear war wouldn't necessarily end our world...One nuke or two two major cities could cause unconditional surrender by the other side. And, a nuclear war has smaller chances of occuring due to the fear of environmental problems and retaliation problems for the attacking side.
In other words, were probably safe for now.
saltystudios 2 years ago
its called Mutually Assured Destruction....haven't you ever watched WarGames?
radix10 2 years ago
actualy there probably never will be one ww3 wont be one either ww3 will probly just longer afgan and pakistan war
ohyes247 2 years ago
notice tthat after the bomb exploded the sky became darker? and the airaround the explosion had ripples in it.. the pushing out of sound waves or particles from the area of impact?
moonshiry 2 years ago
Well, the sky didn't literally become darker ... it's just the way the film exposure changes because of the variance in contrast from the explosion. Whip out your cellphone camera and aim it at the wall, and then a light ... you'll see the same effect at work.
swordwares 2 years ago 4
oo shows how bright that blast was
moonshiry 2 years ago
If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. I am become death the shatterer of worlds
XXXGreenSamurai 2 years ago
when they tested nuclear energy after ww2 no one died right? i think they only died from the fallout maybe a month or two later
legomaster425 2 years ago 2
if anyone died directly from a nuclear bomb post-WWII, it would've cause the cold war to go nuclear, thus ending our world
CalvinDWalker 2 years ago
It's amazing that radiation levels globally did not reach too high of a level seeing as how over 2,000 nukes have been tested globally.
Aelov 2 years ago
I think they'd be dead =/
IceColdFreezie 2 years ago
isolated areas, wonder around the Nevada desert, and some hewaiin (did I spell that right?) islands, you might get some radiation poisoning...
LazyMatt0391 2 years ago
fuck
somberlay 2 years ago
That sound isn't actually the sound of the bomb. (in case someone thinks so)
Weirdo10o4 2 years ago 2
i like the violin sounds of the bomb
primary0 2 years ago 5
No, the boom.
Weirdo10o4 2 years ago
:D
✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪
(wasting space because it says my comment is too short)
Weirdo10o4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm awesome. ayhm gist saying
post3144 2 years ago
that must of owned alot of fish lol
LuigiAkAfido 2 years ago
is this real ? if so in that area the fish must have 3 heads
maurits933 2 years ago 2
the test is real
LuigiAkAfido 2 years ago
what size was that bomb
ddandyy 2 years ago
totally agree with lofi73
it doesnt't matter where you drop this bomb
in every war it will be used in it will kill a lot of innocents
tobse919 2 years ago
I don´t care who drops these things...They are criminals!
lofi73 2 years ago 7
Damn right!,me and jesus gonna be boppin and pill poppin!..wooo!
AssassinMuse91 2 years ago
Are'nt there hundres of old women called the mothers of the plaza de mayo, who march around to this day trying to find out what the Argentinian government did to their kids? And yes, the Japanese WERE trying to build their own A-bomb. They were not, and are not, saints. And neither are Argentinians
matapan50 2 years ago
Falklands war?
nicka2316 2 years ago
Fucking pseudoamericans. Shit-brains. You always playing to see who has the bigger dick. God...have mercy to America.
gacelius 3 years ago
Argentina is the last country in the world to be lecturing anyone.
matapan50 2 years ago
I'm talking as a citizen of the world. That's ok, my country is a shame, but we don´t kill people like a national sport...Hiroshima, Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan...Do I continue?
gacelius 2 years ago
k..
in the end...whe you look at the deaths of hiroshima and nagasaki...and look at what an invasion of japan woulda cost us?
the nuke was the way to go
but.....in the end...i woulda preffered the invasion myself
crusher1995 2 years ago
chances are that the invasion would have never happened, however, tactics would have changed to destroying railroads. The 1946 rice year was far below average (rations in Tokyo fell to 1012 calories a day) and destroyed railroads would have caused starvation. Its thought that Jap. might have surrendered in a few weeks but the USSR was planning to invade. This could have caused a second front for the Cold War. Now the USA and USSR would fight over Berlin AND Tokyo. Could have caused nuclear war.
nukepwetty 2 years ago
Good job, soldier. Way to open the gates of HELL!!!!
Sambonehambone 3 years ago
except for distance, nothing, much less a desk, would have saved anyone from that "explosion" you idiot. Get a clue dumbass.
matapan50 3 years ago
Unfortunately when you see the unmistakable blinding flash you have barely a second to save your life, you can't run a mile away in that time, impossible.
The point is these "duck and cover" exercises would not save everyone but if everyone took cover millions of lives could be saved.
Lessons learn from The Blitz also showed that any advice is better than the government remaining silent on the issue and letting speculation and fear spread like wild fire.
Treblaine 2 years ago
dude
nuclear war?
end of world
period
have fun dying of radiation poisoning if youre not lucky to die instantly
crusher1995 2 years ago
Nuclear war is unlikely to "end the world" as the planet has gone through far worse catastrophes than this and life prevailed, humanity is particularly fickle due to our prevalence and preparations.
The perfect example is Hiroshima and Nagasaki, mainly how those cities still even exists! About 50% of the population survived a direct strike and though that is a "glass half full" perspective even a 25% survival rate gives an incentive to fight to survive rather than give up.
Treblaine 2 years ago
buddy,
those were not even 1 MT blasts
imagine a worldwide nuclear exchange between multiple countries
example: continued...
crusher1995 2 years ago
This Ivy King test of the Mk 18 bomb with a yield of 500Kt is quite representative of the current US, Russian, British and Chinese nuclear arsenal: as the majority of those bombs have yields of only 300-400Kt.
A 400Kt detonation at optimum altitude will destroy about 66 squ km but that will not completely destroy a typical city that is 400km2 in size. Hundreds of thousands may die but most of the population would survive.
And the cities wouldn't even be the main targets but the military bases.
Treblaine 2 years ago
thats what we think : |
well unfortunetly for me and you...
theres only one way to find out :P
yes..most of us would survive but that would leave 100's of sq. miles unhabitable..
where are you going to put the survivors?
more importantly...
how are you going to prevent the radiation and fallout that is sure to follow?
crusher1995 2 years ago
We'd handle the survivors just like Japan did, with great difficulty. Remember, 2 cities were nuked but virtually every other Japanese city was destroyed to the same extent by Le May's fire-bombing tactics. A little known fact is the fire-bombed cities suffered higher casualties than the nuclear attacks.
The grizzly fact is people die in their habitation so though less housing, there are also less people.
But the immediate fallout is not as bad as you would expect from a typical air burst...
Treblaine 2 years ago
well yea air bursts are more immediate damage
crusher1995 2 years ago
A typical air-burst of a 400Kt weapon the fission generates a lot of radioactive by products as well as neutron irradiation of the whole bomb and the surrounding air but this amounts to a relatively small amount of very fine radioactive fallout and being so hot is mostly propelled up into the upper atmosphere where it slowly falls at low risk levels.
This was why the outskirts of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were habitable afterwards with little residual radiation.
Treblaine 2 years ago
Large fallout could be created by a megaton range thermonuclear bomb (large fusion stage) detonating on the surface where the fireball creates a large crater and draws up tons of pulverised rock and soil into the mushroom cloud. Tons of this material is irradiated by neutrons from fusion that falls downwind like volcanic ash within a few hours. See Castle Bravo.
But Surface Detonation were only for use against remote missile silos and is not even used by most nuclear powers any more.
Treblaine 2 years ago
makes sense......
what about bunkers containing top ranking officials?
crusher1995 2 years ago
From Civil Defence documentation on all the likely targets; military bases and silos first, then infrastructure (electricity/fuel/water), then ports like San Fransisco.
But the politicians were Tertiary priority, only a general attack on the capitol to disrupt unity.
I know Strategic Air Command don't operate from a bunker but from a plane as it can "hide" in the large skies. Executive branch would also probably operate from Air Force One then finally retiring to a secret location.
Treblaine 2 years ago
continued:
russia strikes the u.s. the u.s strikes back,
iran says...well use em or lose em,
launches at israel,
nato and whatevers left of the u.s. launchen retalitory strikes againdt iran, meanwhile pakistan and india are exchanging, then north korea says "might as well" launches strikes at south korea etc.....china launches theres at japan, nepal etc. continued...
crusher1995 2 years ago
continued:
remember these are 15MT - 20MT blasts.....
people who are "lucky" to survive the blast (yea right pfft lucky) would have to face a worldwide free-for-all while trying not to lose to radiation poisoning
have fun!
good luck : )
crusher1995 2 years ago
I don't like your attitude saying you are better off to die than live.
Every year thousands of people brave radiation sickness over death when they undergo radiotherapy to treat cancer. The treatment is worse than the disease but people do it because when if comes down to it PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO DIE.
There is nothing lucky or fortunate about dying, it is the worst thing that can happen to you.
So stop ridiculing attempt by governments and individuals to reduce fatalities.
Treblaine 2 years ago
are you for real?
you are telling me you would want to die a slow painful death rather than a quick painless one?
you're crazy.
crusher1995 2 years ago
For one thing there is no guarantee I would die, the slightest radiation exposure is NOT a death sentence. Especially with basic treatments and precautions.
The overwhelming majority of people killed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were killed by blast and burn injuries, not radiation poisoning. This was due to the air-burst where the fireball didn't touch the ground.
It is this IGNORANT attitude that breeds panic that could lead to thousands of pointless suicides in the case of a nuclear attack.
Treblaine 2 years ago
Well yea once you die You go to Heaven and meet Jesus and God, best thing ever.
dangitgimmieaname 2 years ago
Once you die there's nothingness!
Bhinder14 2 years ago
yup
explicitkiid 2 years ago