не знаю кто тут что.... но это хуйня полная! в сравнений чем blitzkrieg 1 первый..Здесь нет даже разведки,нет даже вовремя заправки и только потом начинается поддержка с воздуха,честно скажу я проигрывал 10 раз.
I do not know who's that .... but it is full garbage! in comparison than a blitzkrieg first .. There is not even intelligence. There's not even filling in time, and only then begins air support, to be honest I have lost 10 times and won once, this is what that garbage is full.
Anything but World War II Online is just not good enough... if you have skill there, you get my props, anything else, is just a kids game... COH, COD, all that is like a kids game compaired to World War II Online...
@FlitkoSLO Maybe if it had extended right at the very edges of the Ardennes forest in France... If it had enough anti-air weapons against the German dive-bombers (& fighters), and enough anti-tank cannons for usage against tanks emerging from the depths of the Ardennes forest right across the river Meuse.
The Ardennes forest would have potentially been all the more of a pain in the ass for the Germans then in such a case... &, if Allied air had directly combatted the German forces within it...
COH shud try making the map bigger and giv more different TANKS and Weapons
As far as i am concern USA only has Sherman and AT cannons to fight Tigers and thats boring. Blitzkrieg has many TANKS ugly, beautiful, powerful, scary, unbelivable.
I didnt know Allies had heavy tanks until i play BlitZkrieg. And the sodiers of CoH are not nice. I rather hav control on each soldier then Squads, in Blitzkrieg i can split them up and make them go different directions. Officer use telescope soldiers attack
COH shud try making the map bigger and giv more different TANKS and Weapons
As far as i am concern USA only has Sherman and AT cannons to fight Tigers and thats boring. Blitzkrieg has many TANKS ugly, beautiful, powerful, scary, unbelivable.
I didnt know Allies had heavy tanks until i play BlitZkrieg
I don't know who's stupider, France or Germany. France for having not extended the Maginot line and done more to fight the Nazis. Or Germany for thinking that the USA wouldn't get involved and split their country in two for nearly 50 years.
@nking1299 God knows whether the Maginot Line would have really helped even had it been extended. Patton said that fixced fortification were a monument to the stupidity of man. They were simply outdated at that time. Just look at what the Germans did at Eben Emael.
What about the Napoleonic era, when France had conquered almost all of Europe.
I'm Swedish myself, but I'm just pointing out that you can't generalize like that. BTW, the only real thing that saved Britain from being occupied as well was the fact that it was an island-nation, as it were. You couldn't Blitzkrieg over the English Channel, now could you?
I can't really tell. Obviously they were unaware of the Blitzkrieg, hence the stationary defences of the Maginot line. They thought that if another war would come, 1) it would be similar to the trench warfare of WW1 and 2) the Germans wouldn't advance so rapidly. I have no idea, though, why they were so indifferent to the potential route through Belgium...
Humm I guess so but I thought that they whould have at least picked up something from Chezslovakia Poland Denmark and Norway maby it was becuase they never thought that the Germans could break thorught the Ardens forest??
@DrStrangebomb1993 France refused to the line to Belgium because of politics, France struggled to keep a government during the 30's. They started construction of the line to Belgium right before the Germans came. Neglected the new tactic that used tanks, aircraft, and infantry working in coherence. Britain failed to effectively aid France, the minister was more for "shows".
@thebritish25 The French and British thought that the Germans would invade France through Belgium like they did in WWI, anticipating this maneuver they sent in their forces, which included the British expeditionary force into Belgium, which The Germans did send some troops but was merely a decoy, the main force though had gone through the Ardennes forest which incorporated General von Manstein's strategic proposal of a sickle cut move, which was very risky, but worked well, results show.
@ArcherAsher Oh yes and they did well it was only by luck that the Germans where haulted at the Marne I think that it was the air power that helped the Germans turn the tide.
If any of you wants to play "Sudden Strike Forever or Hidden stroke " Or any of those games add me on xfire " MasacruForGroove" or yahoo " MasacruTheBunny" (Even aoe 2 ) i am being off topic but yoo blitzrkieg games ftw !
Abrams is better, the Leopard doesn't have the Abrams air bubble armor nor its targeting computer, and the gun on the Leopard is an L55, only 10 inches longer than the Abrams L45. Plus, the Abrams crews have actually seen combat, so the Leopard doesn't have shit on an M1 Abrams
si al guien lee mi pregunta porfabor si sabe como se tiene que escribir el truco para abilitar la consola por que puse como lodisen pero no funciona y no medise nada si la actibe
In term of graphics and animation, no game tops COH, maybe World in conflict in some subjects but i think COH is the winner in that matter, the only problem of COH is that its a world war game, but u dont feel it, u dont feel going through a war at all, in blitzkrieg, yeah its not the best graphics out there, yeah it looks like an old game, but hell it does a great job to put u in the world war mood, it does make u feel that ur in a large scale war, COH doesnt.
I really like CoH its a great game...good graphics, good sound, nice weapons but you are right it doesnt feel too real espc when a 2 Puma are able to kill a Churchill (140mm Frontarmor). That sux ass. Right now i really love Theatre of War...feels quiet realistic. I am building up some elite Tiger Crews.
@jozeaphe jup, exactly. and in terms of realism i think BK wins too. because always i see a german panzergrenadier squad fighting a rifleman squad which stands 3 meters away and al 10 soldiers miss each other i laugh my ass off.
@Noobieless Blitzkrieg 2 release date is : October 2, 2005
Command & Conquer: Generals release date is : February 10, 2003
Can you see the difference between the two games graphics? Blitzkrieg 2 looks like it was made in 1995 not 2005, whos the fucking tard now? "DUUUUUUUUUUUDE" fucking noob.
@8900609 Yes its pretty the same. Just make sure when you buy one and you have a standard PC dont buy one wich requires a lot of WATT because then you'll need to change your power supply too. And to make sure it works perfectly you should upgrade your processor and memory (if they're old).
yes its really good. its really ahead of any rts. everything that has a gun can run outta ammo. you gotta keep them resupplyed and repaired at all times
this game is defintly better then CoH cuz you get more units and your not always on the allied side! COH is aight but yo only get paratropper units wich gets kinda lame! and in this the units are more realistic cuz if theres arty fire the troops would drop on the ground! also in CoH the platoons have less men than normal!
not its not...does the soldiers take cover behind different environment NO, does tank ammo deflect off of enemy armored tank NO, do you build a base and go on from there NO, blitzkrieg does none of that so how the fuck did COH copied this game? its just a world war 2 game that might look the same bc each game tries to make it historical correct, why wouldn't they changed the look if that's how france or russia or the pacific looked like seriously
Pulapunk15, it has nothing to do with options, U cant swtich shadows on or off, its supposed to be in the game, If you ever played BKII u would know so stfu if u dont know any shit of it
Pulapunk15, it has nothing to do with options, U cant swtich shadows on or off, its supposed to be in the game, If you ever played BKII u would know so stfu if u dont know any shit of it
can anyone help me in downloading blitzkreig 2.
musa77751 4 months ago
@musa77751 What is your problem?
DukeOfTennessee117 3 months ago
link download?
douglas9988774455 5 months ago
Fuck france!
Heil Deutschland!
TigerMilitia 5 months ago 7
somebody crawling codes? I have not activated the codes and cheats to watch! chemax.ru
mioritsa 8 months ago
не знаю кто тут что.... но это хуйня полная! в сравнений чем blitzkrieg 1 первый..Здесь нет даже разведки,нет даже вовремя заправки и только потом начинается поддержка с воздуха,честно скажу я проигрывал 10 раз.
I do not know who's that .... but it is full garbage! in comparison than a blitzkrieg first .. There is not even intelligence. There's not even filling in time, and only then begins air support, to be honest I have lost 10 times and won once, this is what that garbage is full.
mioritsa 8 months ago
Anything but World War II Online is just not good enough... if you have skill there, you get my props, anything else, is just a kids game... COH, COD, all that is like a kids game compaired to World War II Online...
biggee316 9 months ago
@FlitkoSLO Maybe if it had extended right at the very edges of the Ardennes forest in France... If it had enough anti-air weapons against the German dive-bombers (& fighters), and enough anti-tank cannons for usage against tanks emerging from the depths of the Ardennes forest right across the river Meuse.
The Ardennes forest would have potentially been all the more of a pain in the ass for the Germans then in such a case... &, if Allied air had directly combatted the German forces within it...
GmanGregilla 10 months ago
this deserve coh graphic
MrCouchmen 11 months ago
Does this works on windows vista?
sparten11742 11 months ago
COH shud try making the map bigger and giv more different TANKS and Weapons
As far as i am concern USA only has Sherman and AT cannons to fight Tigers and thats boring. Blitzkrieg has many TANKS ugly, beautiful, powerful, scary, unbelivable.
I didnt know Allies had heavy tanks until i play BlitZkrieg. And the sodiers of CoH are not nice. I rather hav control on each soldier then Squads, in Blitzkrieg i can split them up and make them go different directions. Officer use telescope soldiers attack
raphaeldaar 11 months ago
COH shud try making the map bigger and giv more different TANKS and Weapons
As far as i am concern USA only has Sherman and AT cannons to fight Tigers and thats boring. Blitzkrieg has many TANKS ugly, beautiful, powerful, scary, unbelivable.
I didnt know Allies had heavy tanks until i play BlitZkrieg
raphaeldaar 11 months ago
"I would like to live to see National Socialist (NaZi) fall" -Chaimberlain- but he would be dead before the next year would end
CoolMeSelf001 1 year ago
did they died ?
NextLvlProductions 1 year ago
How do you position your tanks like u did on the bridge 1 in front 1 behind it and 2 right at the back
NishC300 1 year ago
I don't know who's stupider, France or Germany. France for having not extended the Maginot line and done more to fight the Nazis. Or Germany for thinking that the USA wouldn't get involved and split their country in two for nearly 50 years.
nking1299 1 year ago
@nking1299 God knows whether the Maginot Line would have really helped even had it been extended. Patton said that fixced fortification were a monument to the stupidity of man. They were simply outdated at that time. Just look at what the Germans did at Eben Emael.
FlitkoSLO 1 year ago
Blitzkrieg is better than Blitzkrieg 2
MrPartizanski 1 year ago 4
FUCK FRANCE!
tubbyboy1985 1 year ago 5
HAIL HITLER!
PacificAssault1 1 year ago
hail hitler
trickpa80 1 year ago
i hate this map!!
TheSomeguy8874 1 year ago 2
did ea games take it over or sumting coz its shit now
FUSTOM1 1 year ago
Does any know cheats that works for this game i tried some which i found on internet but it isnt working at all.
MrSikira12 1 year ago
wheres napoleon when you need him?
FELOOx1 1 year ago 3
Fucking France...
Crox300 1 year ago
I love CoHs "German steel..." or "Heavy panther, operational..." when you click on panther
Udrakan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BY the way there are some REALY cool russian game Called'' great battles of tobruk '' realy pretty game
ilgvars2 1 year ago
Thank's to the 100.000 french soldiers dead during the Battle of France,,,they were not in their bed
France is'nt an island like Great britain, France have a border with Germany
christmar67 1 year ago
@christmar67 Poland also have border with Germany, but we gived Germany 4x more casualities than france with 4x smaller army.
Crox300 1 year ago
Haha France getting there asses kicked like normal.
caleb505 1 year ago 3
my Problem with Blitzkrieg is its in easy modus and its to hard i am in 2 mission
kennyboy8000 1 year ago
the franch can't fight the gett thare asses kickt every time
wrathfullcape 1 year ago
@wrathfullcape
What about the Napoleonic era, when France had conquered almost all of Europe.
I'm Swedish myself, but I'm just pointing out that you can't generalize like that. BTW, the only real thing that saved Britain from being occupied as well was the fact that it was an island-nation, as it were. You couldn't Blitzkrieg over the English Channel, now could you?
DrStrangebomb1993 1 year ago
DrStrangebomb1993
First you are correct that Britian was saved by are sea are Fleet and are will to fight on
But why did France not see that Germany was going to go thorught Belgium as they had done in the last great war with the Schlefine Plan
thebritish25 1 year ago
I can't really tell. Obviously they were unaware of the Blitzkrieg, hence the stationary defences of the Maginot line. They thought that if another war would come, 1) it would be similar to the trench warfare of WW1 and 2) the Germans wouldn't advance so rapidly. I have no idea, though, why they were so indifferent to the potential route through Belgium...
DrStrangebomb1993 1 year ago
@DrStrangebomb1993
Humm I guess so but I thought that they whould have at least picked up something from Chezslovakia Poland Denmark and Norway maby it was becuase they never thought that the Germans could break thorught the Ardens forest??
thebritish25 1 year ago
@DrStrangebomb1993 France refused to the line to Belgium because of politics, France struggled to keep a government during the 30's. They started construction of the line to Belgium right before the Germans came. Neglected the new tactic that used tanks, aircraft, and infantry working in coherence. Britain failed to effectively aid France, the minister was more for "shows".
ShadowKillah08 1 year ago
@thebritish25 The French and British thought that the Germans would invade France through Belgium like they did in WWI, anticipating this maneuver they sent in their forces, which included the British expeditionary force into Belgium, which The Germans did send some troops but was merely a decoy, the main force though had gone through the Ardennes forest which incorporated General von Manstein's strategic proposal of a sickle cut move, which was very risky, but worked well, results show.
ArcherAsher 1 year ago
@ArcherAsher Oh yes and they did well it was only by luck that the Germans where haulted at the Marne I think that it was the air power that helped the Germans turn the tide.
thebritish25 1 year ago
Stop arguing about COH is better, if you really like WW2 RTS games you will like COH and Blitzkrieg!
DemoScener 2 years ago
If any of you wants to play "Sudden Strike Forever or Hidden stroke " Or any of those games add me on xfire " MasacruForGroove" or yahoo " MasacruTheBunny" (Even aoe 2 ) i am being off topic but yoo blitzrkieg games ftw !
MasacruRo 2 years ago
jesus german tanks tear shit up leopord 2 has to be kick ass the Canadian military uses them woo go Canada and Germany =)
AirsoftGuy264 2 years ago
in world at war 2 nobody can stoped germans tanks but russians can
CoDPlayerCOFLY 2 years ago
I would...if only my PC came back from fixing
KnorpelDelux 2 years ago
lol we blow it up in the air. sounds almost like swedish.... german tanks are the best. leopard 2 the greatest ever
Skid00everest340 2 years ago 3
Abrams is better, the Leopard doesn't have the Abrams air bubble armor nor its targeting computer, and the gun on the Leopard is an L55, only 10 inches longer than the Abrams L45. Plus, the Abrams crews have actually seen combat, so the Leopard doesn't have shit on an M1 Abrams
mallard92 2 years ago
@mallard92 no friend, you don't know shit, thanks.
nomorenigsplease 2 years ago
fail of france
therealwouter 2 years ago 38
lol
boodyanimations 2 years ago
@therealwouter xDDD
TheMasterGamer21 1 year ago
si al guien lee mi pregunta porfabor si sabe como se tiene que escribir el truco para abilitar la consola por que puse como lodisen pero no funciona y no medise nada si la actibe
agustinyamil2000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look so unrealistic. Close Combat's way better.
wenjilu 2 years ago
Close Combat is gay dude.
Babalabagis 2 years ago
In term of graphics and animation, no game tops COH, maybe World in conflict in some subjects but i think COH is the winner in that matter, the only problem of COH is that its a world war game, but u dont feel it, u dont feel going through a war at all, in blitzkrieg, yeah its not the best graphics out there, yeah it looks like an old game, but hell it does a great job to put u in the world war mood, it does make u feel that ur in a large scale war, COH doesnt.
jozeaphe 2 years ago 41
I really like CoH its a great game...good graphics, good sound, nice weapons but you are right it doesnt feel too real espc when a 2 Puma are able to kill a Churchill (140mm Frontarmor). That sux ass. Right now i really love Theatre of War...feels quiet realistic. I am building up some elite Tiger Crews.
KnorpelDelux 2 years ago
@jozeaphe jup, exactly. and in terms of realism i think BK wins too. because always i see a german panzergrenadier squad fighting a rifleman squad which stands 3 meters away and al 10 soldiers miss each other i laugh my ass off.
Choppr777 1 year ago
@jozeaphe dude its a fucking old game u tard
Noobieless 1 year ago
@Noobieless Blitzkrieg 2 release date is : October 2, 2005
Command & Conquer: Generals release date is : February 10, 2003
Can you see the difference between the two games graphics? Blitzkrieg 2 looks like it was made in 1995 not 2005, whos the fucking tard now? "DUUUUUUUUUUUDE" fucking noob.
jozeaphe 1 year ago
blitzkrieg you have the hole part of the mission and in COH a small part.
Voske2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
at coh they look at nothing retards
both of games suck ass
TheRiyad1 2 years ago
Blitzkrieg has nothing on the Close Combat series. Much more realism.
Moreasy 2 years ago
I have it this game and i love it but i can't play it because my computer needs a new graphics card. >=(
wierdman21 2 years ago
what is graphic card? is that a video card? sorry im not good in computer fixing....:(
8900609 2 years ago
@8900609 Yes its pretty the same. Just make sure when you buy one and you have a standard PC dont buy one wich requires a lot of WATT because then you'll need to change your power supply too. And to make sure it works perfectly you should upgrade your processor and memory (if they're old).
DemoScener 2 years ago
omg your jagdpanzer got raped O.o
romantje1234567 2 years ago
would you recomend this game
awsomevideos12 2 years ago
yes its really good. its really ahead of any rts. everything that has a gun can run outta ammo. you gotta keep them resupplyed and repaired at all times
Flyinghotpocket 2 years ago
Comment removed
SQUARELO123 2 years ago
Blitzkrieg 2
wierdman21 2 years ago
@awsomevideos12 Yeah this game is addictive and very fun, especially those big missions where you need to capture a whole town are very fun.
DemoScener 2 years ago
sanane panzercilerin canından,bizim canımızdan olmadığımıza şükret
sasharusski 2 years ago
also, the units in this game are hundreds of times more accurate than in COh...gameplay is better too, more epic :)
HufflepuffTheGreat 2 years ago
yeah,but infantry is rebeling thing,it doesn't attck when I command they run backwards and not shooting
Wocfan 2 years ago
yea that IS pretty cool
wish it would do that for the dead infantrymen
HufflepuffTheGreat 2 years ago
yeah agree
romantje1234567 2 years ago
I love that in Blitzkrieg 2 the trash of the war stays at the field I mean the wrecks of tanks
Wocfan 2 years ago
yeah but bodies dont :(
raulgomez777 2 years ago
he saw that art in the corner and was like "where u goin?"
Jovian84 2 years ago
what i don't like about this games is that when you kill them they disappear...........
fistocruz 2 years ago
this game is very much better than company of heroes. blitzkrieg got a better gameplay and you got more units.
hardcorecrusher12 2 years ago 5
The idea is to scout ahead,make a battleplan and set up your attack,the way this guy is playing is total suicide....
MaistoHelix 3 years ago
FRANCE GOT FUCKED UP
LiLSikBoi 3 years ago
this is very realistic. its looks much much better then all other strategic games. (not thinking of the graphics)
latsabb99 3 years ago
this game is defintly better then CoH cuz you get more units and your not always on the allied side! COH is aight but yo only get paratropper units wich gets kinda lame! and in this the units are more realistic cuz if theres arty fire the troops would drop on the ground! also in CoH the platoons have less men than normal!
Zepol54032 3 years ago
COH copied shit from this game.. i got both game and i see nothing that is the same NOTHING
breakerboy9 3 years ago
i think it is the same thin, just in a different name
dilnatmom 3 years ago
not its not...does the soldiers take cover behind different environment NO, does tank ammo deflect off of enemy armored tank NO, do you build a base and go on from there NO, blitzkrieg does none of that so how the fuck did COH copied this game? its just a world war 2 game that might look the same bc each game tries to make it historical correct, why wouldn't they changed the look if that's how france or russia or the pacific looked like seriously
breakerboy9 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In Blitzkrieg they mostly look at the tanks. In COH they only look at infantry.
Kdssow 2 years ago
your also retarded.... in COH they looked at everything .....
breakerboy9 2 years ago 2
Company of Heroes copies hardly any concepts from this game at all.
The first Blitzkrieg was better, much more strategy and funner gameplay.
BroncoLion 3 years ago
I agree, But both the games are great
confederate880 3 years ago
you turned the songs of, one of the best things in this game :P
duhhps 3 years ago
this game was created be4 CoH...
CoH copied many concepts is this game
duhhps 3 years ago
i have this game but never play with it tho
volure1 3 years ago
Where is all the german infantry?
lundholm4 3 years ago
yeah, I feel the same way, but BK 2 fall of the reich is actually pretty good,i has retained the original gameplay of the first BK game
EinundzwanzigPanzer 3 years ago
hey do you know how to custimise your levels
whitedragon1204 3 years ago
this one looks better than the 1st what other countrie can you play as ??
91amp 3 years ago
Le joue sont fait! Translation: The game is up!
masterDevis 3 years ago
w00t 1st comment, but hey...thats strange?!
U have got Shadows in ur BKII game.
I cant see shadows :S
wich is pretty wierd cuz i have an Intel® 82845/G 64 mb video card, an P4 with 2.000Ghz, and 504 Ram. What is your PC?
Kdssow 3 years ago
kdssow, i'm afraid a 64mb card is very small. i would recommend a 256mb card or even 512mb if you can get a decent one.
jeebateeba56 3 years ago
DUDE USE OPTIONS
pulapunk15 3 years ago
Pulapunk15, it has nothing to do with options, U cant swtich shadows on or off, its supposed to be in the game, If you ever played BKII u would know so stfu if u dont know any shit of it
DuckyForPresident 3 years ago
Pulapunk15, it has nothing to do with options, U cant swtich shadows on or off, its supposed to be in the game, If you ever played BKII u would know so stfu if u dont know any shit of it
Kdssow 3 years ago