@MrCrgl You seem to have difficulty focusing on one issue at a time. That is, you couldn't seem to make any points regarding my health care video and now you have trolled your way on over to this video. But I'll humor you for the time being. (continued)
@2DumbKidsVideo I don't seek to deny anyone the right to assemble, not even public workers. But something has to give.
You can make quippy little remarks all you want, but it is highly unethical for public worker union bosses to negotiate deals with politicians regarding how much of MY TAX MONEY they will get, and then bully their members into contributing to the same politician's campaign and/or voting for them. Period. (continued)
@2DumbKidsVideo This is further compounded by the fact that the average public worker makes 3 times his private sector counterpart with full retirement / health benefits and no chance of being fired for doing crappy work... especially when people like me are struggling to grow our small businesses and hire on new employees that actually add value to an economy.
@2DumbKidsVideo But the thing is that I already had commented many months ago about your so called "points". Still you havent answered a question on THIS video. This comment is brand new since Ive never bothered to see any more of your videos. So feel flattered that Ive seen a second video of yours.
@MrCrgl I think you meant to say, you commented many "minutes" ago. Unless you're simply trolling under different screen names, there is no record of you commenting on the other video prior to 3 days ago.
I absolutely answered your question on this video WHEN I CLEARLY STATED: "I don't seek to deny anyone the right to assemble, not even public workers." This sufficiently answers your question. (Continued)
@2DumbKidsVideo (cont) I'll even take it a step further. As an economist, I don't appreciate the negative economic effects (based on empirical data) that ANY union has on the price of consumer goods (ie: bad for the little guy in which Democrats claim to defend). (continued)
@2DumbKidsVideo However, I do NOT seek to deny anyone the right to assemble, not even public worker unions. I do however seek to limit their ability to make back room deals with MY TAX DOLLARS.
Here's a quick write-up I found on Google for further explanation if you're interested:
@2DumbKidsVideo Oh, I think you are right. I had another account that I forgot the password. I understand your answer but you simply ignored the question !!! what about private workers ? :are private unions any good ? or should they also be eliminated ?
@MrCrgl I did not ignore the question, I simply did not answer it with the words of "good" or "bad" that are required for a toddler to understand, which leads me to believe that you didn't fully comprehend my answer.
Once again (3rd time):
I do not think unions are "good" for anyone but union bosses (that means "bad" for everyone else), whether they be private or public unions. But that doesn't mean that I want to limit someone's right to publicly or privately assemble. (continued)
@2DumbKidsVideo (continued) Your next move will probably be to argue that unions are the only reason why we have certain safety standards within risk-prone industries / overtime pay etc... but I'll be right there waiting for you and prepared to give you another intellectual beat down. Cheers.
@MrCrgl Wow, how did I ever guess that this would be your next move... and that you wouldn't even be able to make a case about it no less? By the way, quippy remarks don't equal making a legitimate case. (continued)
@2DumbKidsVideo Rather than waste any more of my time on a troll, I'll give you a few videos to watch. All of the information within these videos can be backed up with empirical data / economic models.
@MrCrgl All of your comments have been approved. If I was censoring comments, I wouldn't have approved this one.
You're rapidly approaching the status of "troll". That is, you don't really have anything intelligent to offer to the discussion / debate. You just want to run around in circles in an attempt to annoy me. But you don't really annoy me because I deal with people like you all the time.
If you aren't censoring comments then why do they even need to be approved? Case closed.
Darksteel1335 8 months ago
@Darksteel1335 So they can be answered in turn, and to keep the spammers out. Have anything to add to the conversation?
2DumbKidsVideo 8 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo Nah mate I'm all good, good luck with your career.
Darksteel1335 8 months ago
@Darksteel1335 Thanks for stopping by.
2DumbKidsVideo 8 months ago
Yeah, let the US return to labor history before 30's !!! By the way, are you implying that private unions are good or at least ok ?
MrCrgl 10 months ago
@MrCrgl You seem to have difficulty focusing on one issue at a time. That is, you couldn't seem to make any points regarding my health care video and now you have trolled your way on over to this video. But I'll humor you for the time being. (continued)
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo I don't seek to deny anyone the right to assemble, not even public workers. But something has to give.
You can make quippy little remarks all you want, but it is highly unethical for public worker union bosses to negotiate deals with politicians regarding how much of MY TAX MONEY they will get, and then bully their members into contributing to the same politician's campaign and/or voting for them. Period. (continued)
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo This is further compounded by the fact that the average public worker makes 3 times his private sector counterpart with full retirement / health benefits and no chance of being fired for doing crappy work... especially when people like me are struggling to grow our small businesses and hire on new employees that actually add value to an economy.
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo But the thing is that I already had commented many months ago about your so called "points". Still you havent answered a question on THIS video. This comment is brand new since Ive never bothered to see any more of your videos. So feel flattered that Ive seen a second video of yours.
MrCrgl 10 months ago
@MrCrgl I think you meant to say, you commented many "minutes" ago. Unless you're simply trolling under different screen names, there is no record of you commenting on the other video prior to 3 days ago.
I absolutely answered your question on this video WHEN I CLEARLY STATED: "I don't seek to deny anyone the right to assemble, not even public workers." This sufficiently answers your question. (Continued)
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo (cont) I'll even take it a step further. As an economist, I don't appreciate the negative economic effects (based on empirical data) that ANY union has on the price of consumer goods (ie: bad for the little guy in which Democrats claim to defend). (continued)
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo However, I do NOT seek to deny anyone the right to assemble, not even public worker unions. I do however seek to limit their ability to make back room deals with MY TAX DOLLARS.
Here's a quick write-up I found on Google for further explanation if you're interested:
Remove the (dots) and add (.'s)
bit (dot) ly/g1mLgA
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo Oh, I think you are right. I had another account that I forgot the password. I understand your answer but you simply ignored the question !!! what about private workers ? :are private unions any good ? or should they also be eliminated ?
MrCrgl 10 months ago
@MrCrgl I did not ignore the question, I simply did not answer it with the words of "good" or "bad" that are required for a toddler to understand, which leads me to believe that you didn't fully comprehend my answer.
Once again (3rd time):
I do not think unions are "good" for anyone but union bosses (that means "bad" for everyone else), whether they be private or public unions. But that doesn't mean that I want to limit someone's right to publicly or privately assemble. (continued)
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo (continued) Your next move will probably be to argue that unions are the only reason why we have certain safety standards within risk-prone industries / overtime pay etc... but I'll be right there waiting for you and prepared to give you another intellectual beat down. Cheers.
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo hahahaha, and again I repeat my first comment: "let the US return to labor history before 30's !!!" GREAT IDEA Dumb Kid
MrCrgl 10 months ago
@MrCrgl Wow, how did I ever guess that this would be your next move... and that you wouldn't even be able to make a case about it no less? By the way, quippy remarks don't equal making a legitimate case. (continued)
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo Rather than waste any more of my time on a troll, I'll give you a few videos to watch. All of the information within these videos can be backed up with empirical data / economic models.
YouTube Addresses:
Replace the (dot)'s with (.)'s.
bit(dot)ly/mo8Mx0
bit(dot)ly/iDnsRa
bit(dot)ly/iY1cJj
bit(dot)ly/kjAzkt
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
@2DumbKidsVideo You seem to have difficulty posting my comments. Are you controlling the line of discussion ?
MrCrgl 10 months ago
@MrCrgl All of your comments have been approved. If I was censoring comments, I wouldn't have approved this one.
You're rapidly approaching the status of "troll". That is, you don't really have anything intelligent to offer to the discussion / debate. You just want to run around in circles in an attempt to annoy me. But you don't really annoy me because I deal with people like you all the time.
2DumbKidsVideo 10 months ago
YEH!! great vid!
Tugksethfinley 11 months ago