New TV ad: Chris Coons' plan for Washington

[3rdwise]

God Made us all. Luke Chap 1 : Verses 41-45. "The baby leaped in the womb for joy". That is proof we should all be PROLIFE!

[DONGOE]

Vote for this man and you will prove that you are a complete fool !!!

[billybobs123]

HE VOTED FOR THE BAILOUTS!

[RichardMNixon]

@billybobs123

No he didn't, moron, because he wasn't in congress.

Harry Reid calling Coons his pet doesn't say anything about Coons, it says Harry Reid is a really weird guy.

[58kevinm]

Coons is a tax and spend liberal,he raised property taxes in New Castle county three times that totaled 48 %,spent a 200 million dollar surplus and raised taxes on other services.Harry Reid has said Coons is his pet and he would be a rubber stamp for obama's progressive agenda.

[smoothy883]

Chris Coons you've got some sad blue eyes. I dont know you as a person but I can say you would be awful for any state, but Californians would probably love you. Any man that admires Marx is frankly not fit to serve this great nation. By the way Coons I donated $200.00 to your opponent. You're welcome;)

[RichardMNixon]

@smoothy883

That's very kind of you smoothy, I'm sure O'Donnell's landlord will appreciate your donation.

[sogairborne]

Marxist lie to gain power.

[Robo1415]

WHERE WAS THIS CLOWN WHEN THE BAILOUTS WERE TAKING PLACE?OH,HE ONLY BECAME AGAINST THEM WHEN THEY WERE ALREADY A DONE DEAL....HE'S A DEMOCRAT!THE ULTIMATE FRINGE GROUP...

[starVol]

@Robo1415 He is a a prime example of what we (Tea Party and believers) are up against. Look, we have got to vote these Guys out of office this November! Vote em out! Peacefully and legally, but vote em out!

[RichardMNixon]

@Robo1415

Where was he? Engaged in local politics and not in congress.

You are all aware that Republicans voted for the bailouts too, yes? And that a Republican president signed it into law?

Also, how many of you actually know what marxism is? Coons, Obama, Reid, Pelosi, etc. aren't even close.

[Robo1415]

@RichardMNixon And his record there appears not to be very good at all.What you must understand is that the Tea Party seeks to change the GOP to be much more receptive to limited government and liberty.Many of the RINO Republicans who supported the bailouts have found their careers on the" cutting room floor" so to speak..and deservedly so.

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

Coons is (or more like was) a Marxist by his own admission. Maybe now he isn't close, but in his youth he was. The problem is we don't know how much he has changed.

[RichardMNixon]

@moretap

And we know O'Donnell used to be batshit crazy, we don't know how much she has changed. I'm not concerned that she used to be a witch. I'm concerned that she used to think witchcraft was a real thing, no matter which side of it she was on.

She remains completely unqualified and with several unanswered questions about her financial ethics. She's just a hand-puppet for huge businesses and brokers that want lower taxes.

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

Even if she is "just a hand-puppet for huge businesses and brokers," (which she isn't) that is way better than being a hand-puppet for huge government and lawyers (like Coons). Business create our jobs; brokers invest in our economy. Business are our employees and our productive efforts. A huge government and trial lawyers produce very little so they can't be anything but parasitical.

[RichardMNixon]

@moretap

For one, lawyers as a profession are often quite conservative, at least on the east coast.

The government creates jobs too, with tax dollars. How does increasing a CEO's income tax make his corporation less able to hire people?

Brokers also ruined our economy 2-3 years ago, I'd prefer not to put all my hope in them.

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

I specifically said "trial lawyers". 90% of the American Association for Justice (trial lawyers association) political contributions went to Democrats.

Limiting the attractiveness of becoming a CEO prevents those with the abilities to create jobs from wanting to become CEOs. Would you prefer to give a government organization money to create jobs or some private organization? Which one would more efficiently use your money? What is their motivation to do this?

[RichardMNixon]

Yeah, because only making $2 million/year instead of $3 millon/year really makes me want to turn down that CEO position... and of course all CEOs are amazing at creating jobs and of course only receive enormous bonuses for being actually successfully /s.

You're really claiming the TEA party will follow scientific evidence? Rand Paul wouldn't state how old the Earth is.

There is not a single scientific professional society in the western world that denies anthropogenic climate-change.

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

"only making $2 million/year instead of $3 millon/year" Absolutely, if they could get a job consulting or something else for a better salary they would. If they could go to Hong Kong or Singapore for a better salary they would. Their salary is worth exactly what a business is willing to pay for them based on the profit it expects. This is basic economics. The free market is your friends and making it freer will fix more problems than you realize.

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

The TEA party wants to limit government intrusions. This includes limiting how the government hinders scientific progress by politicizing the research and findings. If you don't want the government dictating how old it thinks the earth is for whatever political reason it wants, and you'd prefer to base the age of the earth on the scientific evidence then you must also favor limiting government intrusions into scientific research.

[RichardMNixon]

@moretap

You have it backwards. Science says the Earth's climate is changing as a result of human activity. This isn't political, this is the conclusion best supported by scientific evidence. Democrats and those in favor of environmental legislation are moving to enact policy based on this science. Science -> policy Republicans and the TEA party are politicizing the issue because they're on the payroll of industries that don't want climate legislation. Policy -> objection to science.

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

Then why do they have a political group like the UN's IPCC and a political figure like Al Gore leading the front in pushing this "science"? It is clearly political. If it was really science -> policy, then our policy makers should consult scientific organizations such as the NIPCC (expressly nonpolitical). Science is not a top-down activity, it is bottom-up (similar to the TEA parties structure and ideal).

[RichardMNixon]

In what way is IPCC political? Because you disagree with their conclusion or dislike the UN? It is not a political organization, it's a team of scientists that aggregate and review peer-reviewed scientific literature.

The NIPCC report was published by a conservative think-tank.  How is it any less political than the IPCC?

Bottom-up? What are you talking about?

97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing climate change. 97%. No scientific professional organizations disagree.

[3rdwise]

@RichardMNixon College Class "Art Institute Phila". My text book just said that if we do everything in our power to stop climate change it will only change .2 % difference than if we continue to live how we are... Al Gore was wrong he said Ca. would fall of USA in 2008, or 09..that never happened...He made $..thats it.

[RichardMNixon]

@3rdwise

I don't give a shit about Al Gore; he's a publicist, not an atmospheric physicist. What does atmospheric physics have to do with an art institute?

[3rdwise]

@RichardMNixon Just letting you know that a very liberal school in a very liberal city is even starting to not believe all the hype. I do believe global warming is happening to some degree, but there are far more important things in this age that we should be worrying about...

[RichardMNixon]

@3rdwise

This isn't about liberalism or conservatism, it's about science.

[Darusdei]

@RichardMNixon it's a tax scam! and everyone is in it !

[RichardMNixon]

@moretap

There's also her and the GOP/TEA's constant antagonism to science.  I've read that Castle was the only republican candidate who supported measures to reduce climate change; is that why he lost the primary? Republicans need to pull their blind heads out of their selfish assholes.

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

"antagonism to science"? 1000s of scientists are skeptical of man-caused global warming and the few scientists on UN IPCC (who have been know to repeatably make glaring mistakes) are the only ones the Democrats listen to. Google "Politics in the Guise of Pure Science" for NYT article

[moretap]

@RichardMNixon

"antagonism to science" A bigger government can't help but inject politics into science based on what they choose to fund. A free market give science and researchers the chace to follow evidence wherever it may lead independent of potential political implications. The TEA party is way better for scientific progress.

[elinkfind]

He forgot to mention further marxism his real goal.