You said 'conservative' when describing Hitler, and you were wrong, in terms of a comparison to American Conservatism. BTW, Hitler was not for small government. That would have been wholly inconsistent with his grand scheme. Did you not ever see, for example, the 'government' buildings and cities he had designed? That was small government? Think again.
Listen pal, Hitler was not about big or small government per say. He and his ilk were about control and domination. If that required a large government, then that's was was built. How can you control without the backing of a Big Government? Answer, you cant. That's the context.
@haterbasher4sho at what point did i say a baby is a tumor. Read, Think, Understand THEN RESPOND. Try it some time. It was not a comparison. I was responding to the logic applied which i disagreed with. If you had understood the last sentence you would have come to the conclusion that I am pro life and therefore would never compare a baby to cancer, the key point being-IF YOU UNDERSTOOD! P.S I do not wish to engage you in an extended exchange of insults so don't bother respond.
the term pro abortion is a way the right wing subliminally lies. to be "pro abortion means u want a baby to be aborted every single time, basically meaning u dont want humans on the planet. pro life means u want to completely get rid of abortion( for the most part). pro choice is not "pro abortion" pro choice means a person supports a woman's ability to make a conscious decision every single time. not to just abort a baby just because. stop lying!
@jrrydha Don't have babies if you can't afford them. If you have babies you cannot afford, you starve and die off. Your happiness of family will not be funded by government. Your failure and demise will be funded by freedom, which is death.
@jrrydha (1)When the question "is abortion a crime or a medical procedure?" is asked (and that is essentially the question) the "pro choice" choice at hand is whether to undertake the crime/procedure. If you believe it is just a procedure, and therefore are pro the choice to undergo it, you are technically in approval of the procedure hence pro abortion. The fact you allude to not finding it very pleasant can also be said of chemotherapy.
@jrrydha (2) To further illustrate. I am not pro cancer treatment. I am pro choice of my right to fight the disease in my body. apply that to your belief of the right wing subliminal lies.(For cancer treatment substitute abortion)Then apply your reasoning on pro abortion meaning wanting all humans eradicated. Then go back and realise that if I am pro choice i am pro cancer treatment by default. You cant separate life from abortion even if you only look at the mom's choice.
@Aegius Hmm. Doesn't that say something about America? The greatest country in the history of mankind, especially in terms of freedom and opportunity!
While I agree with most of what you have to say, I do not agree with your stance in support of the two party system. The reason that I do not like the two party system is not divisiveness, I'm fine with that. What worries me most is that if one party was to fall by the wayside (for example, say that the Republicans become marginalized by the propaganda on the left) it would leave us with a 1 party system. Aka, tyranny.
Malcolm X wouldn't even talk or look at this talking head! Malcolm X became a sunni muslims and tried to bring peace among my fellow african-americans whilst the idiot NOI tried to bring about black supremacy. Malcolm X SURE AS HELL DID NOT go anywhere NEAR the republican party, haha!
@halflifeproductionz He had a conservative mindset though. As did MLK. As did Booker T Washington. These kats weren't liberal at all. If you think they were, you are clueless. Malcolm X might have never actually sided with a party but the leaders from the 60s didn't have the poverty pimp mindset of the so called leaders of today. Things got better with the advent of people like MLK. Things have gotten worse for the community now. What's that all about? Neocons aren't Conservatives. lol
@halflifeproductionz but you won't get it. You're one of those types that think Republican = racist. Democrat = saviour. Call this man a talking head but you could have ONLY gotten that lost way of thinking from a talking head yourself. Definitely didn't come from research. If I ask you what a traditional conservative was you'd be lost. LOL One hint, MLK was one. Watch the overemotionalism and name calling commence. SMH
@eyeonwashparish i dont understand what your trying to do? i hate this 2 party superiority in this country. Why aren't independent candidates taking charge?
@halflifeproductionz a theocracy? how you mean that? we were founded on christian principles, but we do not dictate what religion you have to be. Your a liberal drone. even if you dont know it.
@halflifeproductionz I wonder how much you think people care about your opinions in this thread (Although to be fair, who cares about anyone's opinion?lol)
This is the silliest stuff I've ever heard. The republican party of yester year barely exists. Once the really old republicans like Ron Paul and a few others die, the true republican party will die with it. This republican party lacks morals of any kind. Money hungry, hypocritical and cares nothing for religion. Jesus cares for the least of us. That immediately conflicts with the republican party. The democrats believed in slavery and now in social equality. Never vote brand, vote ideals.
@TheGreezyNigger U got a problem with the white man? Jealous? Or are you just a'hatin on your white brothers cause you be bored? Or, and this is probably the reality, you secretly wish you was a white man? Yea, that's it. Word up idiot-bro!
Zo! My brother of another color. You don't have to defend the fact that if ANYTHING should be repeated over and over again, it's TRUTH! Just as the sun rises every day; that's a truth we all wish to be repeated. Nothing but love! great job!
alfonzo rachel is the fuckin' man! he's right, essentially, liberal communists are nazis. how can they claim to be this "pro-choice" horseshit when in fact they are trying to regulate and limit the choices we can make? him, rush limbaugh, alex jones, they are true americans. you liberals discourage and hate them because they foil your socialist principles for what they are, communits, marxist, socialist, basically dictatorial. this nation was founded on limited gov, not gov ruled.
@AfreeQueen How about the failed policies of the Democrat party? How about the racism of the Democrat party? How about their ties to planned parenthood, which was founded on the principle of eliminating the black race? How about segregation.. Democrat party, how about slavery.. Democrat Party. WAKE UP! The republican's has always been the true party of freedom (economic and otherwise) and opportunity for ALL races, not just blacks, but for ALL races. Study Fredric Douglas, and MLK!
@el3m3ntsk8s Michelle Malkin is right, engaging, smart, curious, courageous, relentless, truthful, honest, cultured, principled, moral, and full of energy. She's also young, which means she'll be around for a long, long time. I know that irritates you. You merely think she's ugly cause she's everything you're not.
lastly, Nazis perpetuated the class struggle by claiming Aryans to be superior and trying to kill off other races. Karl Marx wanted everyone to be equal so that class struggles would be non existent.
Under a Conservative government Hitler would never have risen to the kind of power he had because we NEVER believed in a monarchy psuedo or otherwise.
Germany was never a monarchy. Hitler came to power as chancellor in 1933. They still have a chancellor today. It's basically the same thing as a prime minister which is not a dictator because their is a parliamentary body. Hitler became dictator by taking advantage of his power.
Hitler took advantage of his original position as a limited government official and warped the position into a dictatorial one. The government wasn't a monarchy to begin with.
@jrspike2ya The total lack of reading comprehension on the part of conservatives never ceases to amaze me. If you actually read what I was saying was that Hitler originally came into to power as a limited government official. He was originally a chancellor which is a lot like being the president. Next time try not to take things out of context.
@opiumofthetroglodyte By the way, I would appreciate if you would try not to be a fucking asshole in the future. Your repeated insults were based on misunderstandings of what I was saying and you failed to look at the whole conversation. Did you even know I was responding to someone else? I would be willing to start fresh but not if your going to call me an idiot. If you actually knew me you would know I'm not an idiot.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Ok. I have a straightforward question for you. Are you a Liberal? Every post I see of yours suggests you are indeed, a huge liberal? And why do I need to read other posts, if what you're saying is complete BS?
Here are a few other policies of the Nazis that were right wing:
-They were nationalists(conservatives are far more patriotic and loyal to the U.S. than liberals)
-They were war mongers(liberals are completely against war)
-the Nazis persecuted homosexuals. Homosexuality and gay rights groups were banned because Hitler considered them a threat to Germany's moral fiber.(LOL, sound familiar?) Before Hitler. Germany was considered one of the most liberal countries on gay rights.
this is true. Nazi Germany used socialism but they were radically right wing which led to fascism. Hitler didn't get along with Stalin, who was radical left wing, therefore communist. I think it's amazing how these uneducated republicans dont know what those words mean. If you read J.A. Roger's material on how race was treated in Germany, and other parts of Europe before WW2, you'll see that they were certainly more tolerant over there than they were in the USA during the early 1900s!
I know you and other conservatives are loyal to the United States. The Nazis were also loyal to their country. That's the whole point.
Roosevelt tried to avoid intervening in WW2 but it was inevitable after pearl harbor.
Liberals aren't attacking religion. If anything conservatives attack those that aren't Christians by trying to have prayer in public school and let's not forget that Bush said atheists weren't citizens.
Like I said before the Nazis were not secular like liberals are.
Was dropping a second nuke inevitable too? Oh and I made a mistake earlier. The japanese surrendured after nuke #1. But I guess the second nuke was a misfire right?
Prayer in public is a right. Of COURSE we defend it.
Hitler banned homosexuality because he believed it to be a mutation (which to a degree I also believe) and didn't want then "dirtying" his master race.
You're wrong. The second nuke was dropped on August 9. Japan offered to surrender on August 10. So no they did not surrender after the first nuke it was only after the second nuke. Truman did the right thing because we were running out of resources and Japan planned to continue fighting. He did what he had to do. The Iraq war, however, was completely unnecessary.
I wasn't talking about public prayer. I was talking about school teachers guiding students in prayer.
There was never a threat of radiation and craters. There were no weapons of mass destruction.
My original point, which we've seem to have deviated from was that anti-war people tend to be liberal and pro-war people end to be conservative. The Nazis were certainly not anti-war.
I already told you I'm not demonizing your beliefs. I'm just saying that the Nazis were right wing extremists. One of their right wing characteristics was banning homosexuality.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Actually, liberals talk anti-war, but act like complete hawks. LBJ, Obama, Carter, Hitler, Stalin, Pol-Pot, etc., etc. Conservatives end wars, either on the battlefield, or sometimes without firing a single shot. I give you Ronald Reagan. Now it would seem that if you truly opposed war, you'd love Reagan's approach. Don't try giving me the G. Bush example either. He isn't a conservative. But that said, he's not liberal either. He won his wars, and planned the exit.
Let me give you an analogy: What Hitler did would be kind of like the president taking office then taking advantage of the position by expanding the position's power until it was a dictatorial one. If the president were to do this, that wouldn't make our government a pseudo-monarchy. It would just mean that the president took advantage of his position in a conservative government.
@opiumofthetroglodyte This is one of the most incoherent attempts at writing I've ever seen. What are you talking about? A conservative government? Are you a liberal? You sure act like one.
@jrspike2ya It wasn't talking to you asshole. It would make sense if you looked at the whole conversation. When I said conservative government I meant limited government. Again I was referring to the fact that Hitler's original position was one of limited power. He turned Germany into a dictatorship.
This whole argument is a quibble anyway. The idea that conservatives want limited government is a false one. Conservative actually want big government on military and social issues.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Conservatives want the most powerful means to protect the citizenry.. that probably includes even you.. from outside threats to our freedom. You do that via the military. Even you should be able to understand that simple logic. That's what the Constitution requires, by the way, of the central government, and not much more than that.
@jrspike2ya That doesn't include banning homosexual marriage and continuing the war on drugs. It also doesn't include unnecessary wars. The founding fathers were isolationists. They would be appalled by the wars and by military spending.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Truman dropped the bomb because he thought it to be the most humane to do, for both sides. It had nothing to do with American resources, idiot.
@jrspike2ya First off there was a reason they wanted to end the war. It was to prevent more soldiers from dying. Soldiers are a form of human resource. So resources are always an issue. I don't know why you would bring this up I don't disagree with the bombings.
conservative in being anti religious, pro abortion, pro keeping other races subjugated, pro national healthcare, anti business, pro government intervention in the market, pro government controlled means of production... then yes he was conservative... in a VERY LIBERAL DEMOCRAT way
Hitler wasn't anti-religious moron. How many times do I have to explain this? The Nazi's belt buckle said "God with us" on it. Hitler made many references to his belief in God in Mein Kampf, including this one where he says "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord". Hitler also directly affirmed his Catholicism and criticized secular schools. How very religious of him.
He done all of that, but what you fail to realize he was quite the opposite of what he preached. He done these things to be in favor for the German people. He denounced the Jewish people when he himself was Jewish. He proclaimed to be of the Aryan race when in fact he wasn't. He believed the German people had a right to their own property, but their property belonged to the Reich as he stated in a 1933 interview. He even compared the Nazis to Marxism and what is marxism?
Hitler was not a corporatist, Mussolini was. Hitler was vehemently against free-trade policies, meaning he was anti-capitalist.
The Nazi party was technically the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Thus, Hitler was a socialist. Socialized healthcare, would thereby be something he, in some manner, agreed with.
Finally, liberals do subjugate races by creating racial status-quos for colleges and not hiring white firefighters because the black people failed the entrance test.
All you have done is set up a false dichotomy between Capitalism and socialism. The fact that he opposed free trade means nothing because i never claimed him to be a capitalist. You can oppose free trade and be a corporatist.
What Hitler certainly wasn't was a socialist. You're arguing that the Nazis were socialists because they called themselves socialists. This is obviously a non sequitur. If you can't see how fallacious that is I can't help you.
Recent research by academics such as Götz Aly has emphasized the role of the extensive Nazi social welfare programs that focused on providing employment for German citizens and insuring a minimal living standard for German citizens. Heavily focused on was the idea of a national German community.
According to the research of Robert N. Proctor for his book The Nazi War on Cancer, Nazi Germany had arguably the most powerful anti-tobacco movement in the world.
In 1935 the regime enacted the "Reich Nature Protection Act". While not a purely Nazi piece of legislation since parts of its influences pre-dated the Nazi rise to power, it nevertheless reflected Nazi ideology.
-From "How Green Were the Nazis?" by Jonathan Olsen
Gotz Aly has been heavily criticized by other historians. Apparently he thinks that Gandhi was a friend of Hitler. I'm not sure I can trust what this guy says.
Yes, there were environmentalist aspects of Nazi policy but that doesn't change the fact that Nazi policy had many right wing aspects such as there nationalism, there policy on homosexuality and Hitler's expansion of the military and expansionist foreign policy.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Enough with the propaganda. Right wing in he NAZI party has nothing to do with the modern Conservative principles in America. So quit trying to make that connection though your twisted (or ignorant) understanding of the word 'Right'. Get some education before shooting your mouth off. The real connection is socialism.. stateism, LIBERALISM! That's what the NAZIs and the modern Democrat party have in common. It destroys everything. It's a disease, and you have it!
@opiumofthetroglodyte On the 'right' of what? Where's the context? People read your statement and they make a modern day connection. You do nothing to clear up the meaning based on 1930's/40's context. It's clear you're perfectly happy to have the perception that the term 'Right' means the same thing as Nazi. That's propaganda, and misinformation. Lucky I'm here to shatter your propaganda attempts.
Things like affirmative action don't subjugate races. If you look at the justification behind it it does the opposite. The purpose is to make up for the past subjugation of Black people which conservatives were at fault for. I don't agree with affirmative action but there is nothing about it that subjugates white people.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Hey jerk, modern day conservatives aren't for banning homosexuality. If you want to ignore the pitfalls, that's your perog. Just don't come to me later begging for money to fix your problems.
I never said that disagreeing with gay marriage is wrong and I never attacked you for your opinion. I simply pointed out that Hitler banned homosexuality because he considered it dangerous to the moral fiber of Germany. This bears a striking resemblance to conservative opinions on homosexuality. Before Hitler came to power Germany was one of the most liberal countries on gay marriage.
thing about homosexuality is that it's against religious morals because in the bible it states the marriage is holy matrimony between and MAN and a WOMAN. not between men or between women. and the significance of the religious morals is because that's strictly what the constitution is, a document derived of old anglo-saxon laws, which is derived of ancient israeli law. the constitution may not be clear on gay marriage, but in the 10th amendment, each state has the right to gov itself as long as
the laws do not conflict with federal law, which is in the constitution, which does not touch on the subject of gay marriage, but it does race in the 13th and 14th amendment, which were never ratified. gay and race are different, because race is oriented around ethinicity, while gay is choice. so in all actuality, amendments that were never ratified are obsolete. however, the 13th and 14th amendments aren't so much about giving minorities equal rights, so much as giving the states power.
despite what the political parties believe on gay marriage, it is strictly an issue with the states alone, not the entire nation. and with a majority vote from the people of the states, laws may be amended as long as they do not conflict with laws of the constitution. essentially, gays are just citizens with as much rights as heteros. but minorities do not have a place in this white dominated society, because the 14th amendment is not an amendment, but a corruption of the constitution.
What the hell does believing that the Earth is overpopulated have to do with believing in a master race?
Also liberals don't want to take religion out of public. We just think that having teachers lead prayer in public school where people of all sorts of religions attend is antithetical to religious freedom. It's also a violation of the establishment clause because the teacher is paid with tax dollars to teach. Atheists, Muslims, jews etc. shouldn't have to pay for teachers to preach.
that's what i was thinking when i watched his video. I'm a humanist/atheist (and i'm also black, which is rare, i know lol) and i'm very moderate and i see good points from both sides. i don't care what someone believes in as long as they don't go around kicking it in someone else's face. christians wouldn't want it happening to them! church and state is seperated for that very reason. i agree with malcom and rush on reliance and diversity, but i don't have faith in a "god". i believe in MYSELF.
I'm also an atheist and I agree that people can believe whatever they want and can express it in public but what makes me angry are people like Alan Keyes that support teacher guided prayer in public schools. That's just ridiculous to claim to be a supporter of religious freedom while at the same time trying to make prayer a part of public school which is attended by kids of all sorts of religious backgrounds. Not to mention non-Christian taxpayers will have to pay for this.
Keyes is a little world where only Christians are real Americans. Ishmael Jaffree, who happens to be black, is responsible for the law against this. Blacks and conservatives (both are extremely Christian) have demonized him because of that.
Many important people who happened to be non-religious are virtually forgotten in American history. The few who get mentioned (Fredrick Douglas, W.E.B. DuBois) are NEVER called humanist, atheist, etc, by the mainstream, because that would make them EVIL.
@opiumofthetroglodyte First off, public schools are unconstitutional. Second, I'm pretty sure that given the choice, catholic schools would outpace atheist schools in enrollments any day of the week. It's not even close.
The Nazis weren't socialists either. They were corporatist. While corporatism can be a left or right ideology, the brand employed by Nazis was more to the right because they suppressed labor unions and served corporate interests.
It's true that Hitler was pro abortion but he certainly wasn't pro choice. He only allowed abortion for non-Aryan women and considered it the duty of Aryan mothers to raise children.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Please everyone, do your own research. You'll quickly see that this clown is wrong about practically everything. Again with the purposeful misrepresentation of the term 'Right'. It has nothing to do with American Conservatism. American Conservatives are 'Free Market Capitalists'. What's 'corporatism' anyway? If you mean government running companies, or owning them.. then there are specific terms for that. Crony capitalism, Fascism, communism.
@jrspike2ya Crony capitalism is what we have in this country. Just look at the bailout or the fact that politicians are owned by corporate America. I'm not saying that this is the fault of real conservatives such as libertarians. It's the fault of people who believe corporations are people.
@opiumofthetroglodyte I'll probably regret this but, here goes anyway... If a corporation is not people, then what is it? BTW, a 'real' conservative is not a libertarian.
Hitler didn't want to separate church and state you misinformed hack. The Nazis belt buckle said "God with us" on it. Hitler also stated that he thought he was doing the work of the almighty creator in mein Kamf. Hitler did the exact opposite of take religion out of government, he used religion to accomplish political goals which is reminiscent of Bush saying he believes that God wants everyone to be free to justify the Iraq war.
@opiumofthetroglodyte Wow, now your trying to compare Hitler's twisted believe system with Bush doctrine. By the way, God probably does want everyone to 'freely pursue their interests', within the constraints of virtue and morality. God did, after all, create men equal, which means no man should be slave to another. Don't you believe that? Or do you think it's ok for one man to rule over another? Stop telling us what you think everyone else believes, and tell us what you believe.
Liberals have no substance to there arguements, so they have to resort to calling people racist, homophobes, nazis and sexist to demonize the opposition. They ignore facts and cherry pick truths to further there agenda. They dream of a world with no money, religion or countries, but what they dont realize is human beings by nature have an ego and a lust for money and power. And if give Liberals these you will see how hipocritical they really are. (michael Moore) (ted kennedy)....etc
I'm white. I don't support President Obama's policies. But I supported Alan Keys run for President. According to liberals, since I don't support President Obama, that makes me a racist. How can that be if I want Alan Keys to be President instead of Barak Obama?
Adolph Hitler was a socialist/fascist. He was a great orator. He nationalized many German industries. He then initiated the conflicts that started WWII (although our guy hasn't yet done that, but soon enough).
He met joe da plumber yall! He said the dude is chill! He seems like he has ur vote already! Joe da plumber has stated he dont wanna be famous(or does he), why u usin his name to get u some fame?
Dude the Democratic and Republic parties are both just different ways to gain power and abuse it for some other interest that has nothing to do with the interests of the population.
If you think things like free market will be beneficial in any way to our economy then you are completely blind and naive.
I can go on for days about how all you peons can do is talk about your freedoms and liberties while in truth, you dont have shit. You are a slave to corporation and are abused by a higher power
the nazi's were evil because the used lies propaganda and fear to persuade the people to do what they wanted them to do, and silenced their opposition. most immoral.
Excellent point, Zo. Here's some more ammo for your arsenal: What about all the black folks who voted for Obama simply because he is black? Is that not just as racist as a white person not voting for him for the same reason?
Why should black folk vote for a black man simply becuz he's black? Why should so-called "real americans" vote for mccain, simply becuz he went to war? U dont think black folk would'nt understand why white people went for a white guy? Those black folk that saw the racism in the 60's, who didnt know racism until they felt it, u can call them racists, becuz they probably are, just like the whites in the 60's who didnt want segregation! They are still here, and the black guys are still here!
My point is that racism is destructive no matter what side it's on. I disagree with Obama's politics, not his skin color. I simply believe it to be misguided for a black person to support Obama because he is black, having no knowledge of his political views. If you know where he stands politically, and you support him, more power to you. If you support him based on race, that's sad.
For white people to be bitter with the fact that a "black man" wanted to see a "black man" in office!! Its easy to say wait, when u've been had ur fill!
It's not the fact that he's black, it's the fact that he's a liberalist bigot and pro-abortionist. And there are black conservatives, such as Condoleeza Rice and Alan Keyes. The Democratic whites would have been just as upset had Keyes been President. Not because he's black, but because he stands for everything they don't stand for.
Wait... don't act like your on my side you crazy right wing extremist! You obviously don't get it. You conservatives are the reason that.. I mean.. it's your fault that...well if it weren't for you we would... you just dont get it. SHUT UP!!!!!
I can't agree with that view of the 2 party system as a good thing, or it almost felt like you were thinking a 1 party system would be better? I'd rather vote for the best person for the job irregardless of ethnicity or gender, and political party. I don't like the idea that basically I only have two options, it's like.. Time for your black eye, left or right? Well, to tell you the truth I'd rather not get punched in either eye..
I believe the phrase "sell out" rings just about right. But hey, if this is how he feels he needs to swing it, in order to get that "white" vote, then go for it my friend. It's just sad to watch.
you are awesome. I wish you had a national platform, we need more people like you speaking on behave of conservative values. I have been watching your videos for about 2 hours and as a conservative and it is refreshing to find a conservative who are agree with 98% of the time (the 2% is attributed to our disagreement on gay marriage; on this issue we disagree but I respect your position). Thank you for your videos, I pray that your voice is heard on a national level.
Keep it up patriot! All I see are negative comments posted about what you have to say. Don't let those discourage you. You know you're over the target when the flack is the thickest! God Bless America!!!!!
your a good speaker but you have one problem, your not credible, ive read alot of books on the topics you discuss in your videos and you leave out alot of facts that would...well..destroy your argument, in future videos could you give references from reliable sources, it would help you alot!
Wrong again. Rush Limbaugh is fighting accusations that he's the leader of the "Republican Party". Don't pretend like this is about his position as head of the Conservative Movement, which is not in dispute. Also, Rush and his ilk continues to blast Malcolm X and Dr. King as racists and communists for stressing black capitalism and government independence. Dude, you're just a by-the-numbers neocon spinster. You would be humiliated if you ever tried to engage anyone with that.
wtf? I've never heard Rush Limbaugh once call Malcolm X and Dr. King racist and I've listened to his show for years. FYI theres no such thing as "black capitalism" it's just capitalism.
Hmmm...dipping into the pockets of the wealthy to spread the wealth around. Well, that's what Palin did when she forced the oil companies to pay dividends to certain Alaskans. What does that make her? To me, that makes her one of us libs. That and the 500million in earmarks she spent on her state. You know? Palin isn't so bad after all.
What you don't understand is that she considers the natural resources of Alaska BELONG TO ALASKANS. As the people of Alaska, they have a right to profit off the resources of the state.
Than by that principal, the money made by the rich oil companies should belong to the rich oil companies. On the other hand, if our natural resources belong to all citizens than all citizens should share in it's profit. You attempt to have it both ways with your comment.
That is absolutely more stupid than your original comment. Who said the rich are making their money using state owned natural resources. You don't have a clue how to defend your position so please stop because your ignorance becomes more obvious with each post.
The problem with the Republican Party, after this last election, was that they did NOT stick to their principals of Fiscal responsibility and avoidance of Imperialism. This alienated no small number of the Libertarian conservatives. Bush had no problem with Stimulus.
You paint with a broad brush. Read Franklin and Jefferson, there's no isolationism. Maybe a hint or so with Hamilton, but nothing like Ron Paul.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
You said 'conservative' when describing Hitler, and you were wrong, in terms of a comparison to American Conservatism. BTW, Hitler was not for small government. That would have been wholly inconsistent with his grand scheme. Did you not ever see, for example, the 'government' buildings and cities he had designed? That was small government? Think again.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Listen pal, Hitler was not about big or small government per say. He and his ilk were about control and domination. If that required a large government, then that's was was built. How can you control without the backing of a Big Government? Answer, you cant. That's the context.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
In terms of Liberals and Abortion:
"EXECUTE A CONVICTED MURDERER??? THAT'S INHUMANE!!!! Abort a baby? OK! Go for it!"
Hypocritical, immoral and wrong. if you're a liberal you're ....sick.
archona54 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
waka flocka flame
summitgoalie09 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You all fucking suck!!!!!
ultraDoogishone 1 year ago
Each of your postings keep getting better and better. I'd say God bless you, but young man, he has already. Abundantly. Thank you.
metubegirl01 1 year ago
@haterbasher4sho apology accepted and reciprocated. I went a bit far with my reposte, but you know how engaging with tubers can be. take care.
vdotme 1 year ago
@haterbasher4sho at what point did i say a baby is a tumor. Read, Think, Understand THEN RESPOND. Try it some time. It was not a comparison. I was responding to the logic applied which i disagreed with. If you had understood the last sentence you would have come to the conclusion that I am pro life and therefore would never compare a baby to cancer, the key point being-IF YOU UNDERSTOOD! P.S I do not wish to engage you in an extended exchange of insults so don't bother respond.
vdotme 1 year ago
the term pro abortion is a way the right wing subliminally lies. to be "pro abortion means u want a baby to be aborted every single time, basically meaning u dont want humans on the planet. pro life means u want to completely get rid of abortion( for the most part). pro choice is not "pro abortion" pro choice means a person supports a woman's ability to make a conscious decision every single time. not to just abort a baby just because. stop lying!
jrrydha 1 year ago
@jrrydha Don't have babies if you can't afford them. If you have babies you cannot afford, you starve and die off. Your happiness of family will not be funded by government. Your failure and demise will be funded by freedom, which is death.
BallsInYourJawsBitch 1 year ago
@BallsInYourJawsBitch that comment has nothing to do with what i said, good job at being irrelevant....
jrrydha 1 year ago
@jrrydha (1)When the question "is abortion a crime or a medical procedure?" is asked (and that is essentially the question) the "pro choice" choice at hand is whether to undertake the crime/procedure. If you believe it is just a procedure, and therefore are pro the choice to undergo it, you are technically in approval of the procedure hence pro abortion. The fact you allude to not finding it very pleasant can also be said of chemotherapy.
vdotme 1 year ago
@jrrydha (2) To further illustrate. I am not pro cancer treatment. I am pro choice of my right to fight the disease in my body. apply that to your belief of the right wing subliminal lies.(For cancer treatment substitute abortion)Then apply your reasoning on pro abortion meaning wanting all humans eradicated. Then go back and realise that if I am pro choice i am pro cancer treatment by default. You cant separate life from abortion even if you only look at the mom's choice.
vdotme 1 year ago
He is soooooooo true.
regdawgformerusmc 1 year ago
look on my channel and youll see a good political song
irish4272 1 year ago
Slavery isn't quite done. Okay, in America it is, but not in other parts of the world as in parts of Africa & Asia.
Aegius 1 year ago
@Aegius Hmm. Doesn't that say something about America? The greatest country in the history of mankind, especially in terms of freedom and opportunity!
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Keep educating the people my friend, the world needs more people like you. Multicolored power!
jdglws 1 year ago
While I agree with most of what you have to say, I do not agree with your stance in support of the two party system. The reason that I do not like the two party system is not divisiveness, I'm fine with that. What worries me most is that if one party was to fall by the wayside (for example, say that the Republicans become marginalized by the propaganda on the left) it would leave us with a 1 party system. Aka, tyranny.
V20T18R15O12L12L 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I LOVE YOU SO
NO HOMO
MOSS4PRESIDENT 1 year ago
GLENN BECK WOULD LOVE YOU AND YOUR STAND
sb81149 1 year ago
Wouldn't Dr. King be proud of the children killing children and families destroying themselves for drugs, The Dream is Dead.
DammitDrag 1 year ago
Malcolm X wouldn't even talk or look at this talking head! Malcolm X became a sunni muslims and tried to bring peace among my fellow african-americans whilst the idiot NOI tried to bring about black supremacy. Malcolm X SURE AS HELL DID NOT go anywhere NEAR the republican party, haha!
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
@halflifeproductionz He had a conservative mindset though. As did MLK. As did Booker T Washington. These kats weren't liberal at all. If you think they were, you are clueless. Malcolm X might have never actually sided with a party but the leaders from the 60s didn't have the poverty pimp mindset of the so called leaders of today. Things got better with the advent of people like MLK. Things have gotten worse for the community now. What's that all about? Neocons aren't Conservatives. lol
eyeonwashparish 1 year ago
@halflifeproductionz but you won't get it. You're one of those types that think Republican = racist. Democrat = saviour. Call this man a talking head but you could have ONLY gotten that lost way of thinking from a talking head yourself. Definitely didn't come from research. If I ask you what a traditional conservative was you'd be lost. LOL One hint, MLK was one. Watch the overemotionalism and name calling commence. SMH
eyeonwashparish 1 year ago
@eyeonwashparish democrats = worthless pussies! republicans are dickheads or are up themselves and want to make this country into a fuckin theocracy.
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
@halflifeproductionz You're overemotional and you missed the point. Never mind.
eyeonwashparish 1 year ago
@eyeonwashparish i dont understand what your trying to do? i hate this 2 party superiority in this country. Why aren't independent candidates taking charge?
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
@halflifeproductionz a theocracy? how you mean that? we were founded on christian principles, but we do not dictate what religion you have to be. Your a liberal drone. even if you dont know it.
nintendude60 1 year ago
The young african american poster boy the republican is masturbating for! i wonder how much money this prick makes.
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
@halflifeproductionz I wonder how much you think people care about your opinions in this thread (Although to be fair, who cares about anyone's opinion?lol)
TheSwedishAssassin 1 year ago
@halflifeproductionz What? Learn how to write.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
keep it up and you'll get a job at the famous circus called faux noise!
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
This is the silliest stuff I've ever heard. The republican party of yester year barely exists. Once the really old republicans like Ron Paul and a few others die, the true republican party will die with it. This republican party lacks morals of any kind. Money hungry, hypocritical and cares nothing for religion. Jesus cares for the least of us. That immediately conflicts with the republican party. The democrats believed in slavery and now in social equality. Never vote brand, vote ideals.
newave123456 1 year ago
do you get alot of white pussay by kissin up to the white man?
TheGreezyNigger 1 year ago
@TheGreezyNigger U got a problem with the white man? Jealous? Or are you just a'hatin on your white brothers cause you be bored? Or, and this is probably the reality, you secretly wish you was a white man? Yea, that's it. Word up idiot-bro!
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
It's about time someone could lay liberals in their place with a Hitler relation.
TangoCharlie3 1 year ago
Great point. Hitler was a socialist, not a right-wing extremist. It is about time people understood this. Excellent video.
DecimusIuvenalis 1 year ago
Zo! My brother of another color. You don't have to defend the fact that if ANYTHING should be repeated over and over again, it's TRUTH! Just as the sun rises every day; that's a truth we all wish to be repeated. Nothing but love! great job!
ThePaisleyPhage 1 year ago
Zo owns Liberal ideology like Mother Teresa owns poverty.
NifoOtiBoy 1 year ago
Damn, Zo... once again you knocked it out of the park.
ladyraze 2 years ago
alfonzo rachel is the fuckin' man! he's right, essentially, liberal communists are nazis. how can they claim to be this "pro-choice" horseshit when in fact they are trying to regulate and limit the choices we can make? him, rush limbaugh, alex jones, they are true americans. you liberals discourage and hate them because they foil your socialist principles for what they are, communits, marxist, socialist, basically dictatorial. this nation was founded on limited gov, not gov ruled.
TheAequitas0 2 years ago
And I'm not going to stop being a Democrat because some people in the party failed.
AfreeQueen 2 years ago
@AfreeQueen How about the failed policies of the Democrat party? How about the racism of the Democrat party? How about their ties to planned parenthood, which was founded on the principle of eliminating the black race? How about segregation.. Democrat party, how about slavery.. Democrat Party. WAKE UP! The republican's has always been the true party of freedom (economic and otherwise) and opportunity for ALL races, not just blacks, but for ALL races. Study Fredric Douglas, and MLK!
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Michelle Malkin is not cute! She is internally ugly...
el3m3ntsk8s 2 years ago
@el3m3ntsk8s Michelle Malkin is right, engaging, smart, curious, courageous, relentless, truthful, honest, cultured, principled, moral, and full of energy. She's also young, which means she'll be around for a long, long time. I know that irritates you. You merely think she's ugly cause she's everything you're not.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Comment removed
el3m3ntsk8s 2 years ago
LMAOL! Your funny Zoe you hit these kids with Hitler and national socialism aka nazism. Your so right!
tvshowclassics 2 years ago
lastly, Nazis perpetuated the class struggle by claiming Aryans to be superior and trying to kill off other races. Karl Marx wanted everyone to be equal so that class struggles would be non existent.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Under a Conservative government Hitler would never have risen to the kind of power he had because we NEVER believed in a monarchy psuedo or otherwise.
wormer105 2 years ago
Germany was never a monarchy. Hitler came to power as chancellor in 1933. They still have a chancellor today. It's basically the same thing as a prime minister which is not a dictator because their is a parliamentary body. Hitler became dictator by taking advantage of his power.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Hitler had total control and ran the whole thing like a royal king as opposed to limited government official.
I stick by what I said. Under Conservative Light Hitler would probably have never reached the heights he did.
wormer105 2 years ago
Hitler took advantage of his original position as a limited government official and warped the position into a dictatorial one. The government wasn't a monarchy to begin with.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte You are totally clueless, and have no credibility! Hitler.. limited government... monarchy? WTH are you babbling about?
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya The total lack of reading comprehension on the part of conservatives never ceases to amaze me. If you actually read what I was saying was that Hitler originally came into to power as a limited government official. He was originally a chancellor which is a lot like being the president. Next time try not to take things out of context.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte By the way, I would appreciate if you would try not to be a fucking asshole in the future. Your repeated insults were based on misunderstandings of what I was saying and you failed to look at the whole conversation. Did you even know I was responding to someone else? I would be willing to start fresh but not if your going to call me an idiot. If you actually knew me you would know I'm not an idiot.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Ok. I have a straightforward question for you. Are you a Liberal? Every post I see of yours suggests you are indeed, a huge liberal? And why do I need to read other posts, if what you're saying is complete BS?
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Here are a few other policies of the Nazis that were right wing:
-They were nationalists(conservatives are far more patriotic and loyal to the U.S. than liberals)
-They were war mongers(liberals are completely against war)
-the Nazis persecuted homosexuals. Homosexuality and gay rights groups were banned because Hitler considered them a threat to Germany's moral fiber.(LOL, sound familiar?) Before Hitler. Germany was considered one of the most liberal countries on gay rights.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
this is true. Nazi Germany used socialism but they were radically right wing which led to fascism. Hitler didn't get along with Stalin, who was radical left wing, therefore communist. I think it's amazing how these uneducated republicans dont know what those words mean. If you read J.A. Roger's material on how race was treated in Germany, and other parts of Europe before WW2, you'll see that they were certainly more tolerant over there than they were in the USA during the early 1900s!
docdoom187 2 years ago
opium: I am loyal to the country in which I was raised. Drown me.
WW 1 and 2 were heralded by dems in congress. WW2 used nukes not once buy TWICE (Japanese surrendered after nuke #2.)
Religion was also attacked under Hitler's regime.
Oh and disagreing with same-sex marriage isn't wrong. Having my opinions isn't wrong. You attacking people for not agreeing with you IS wrong.
wormer105 2 years ago
I know you and other conservatives are loyal to the United States. The Nazis were also loyal to their country. That's the whole point.
Roosevelt tried to avoid intervening in WW2 but it was inevitable after pearl harbor.
Liberals aren't attacking religion. If anything conservatives attack those that aren't Christians by trying to have prayer in public school and let's not forget that Bush said atheists weren't citizens.
Like I said before the Nazis were not secular like liberals are.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Was dropping a second nuke inevitable too? Oh and I made a mistake earlier. The japanese surrendured after nuke #1. But I guess the second nuke was a misfire right?
Prayer in public is a right. Of COURSE we defend it.
Hitler banned homosexuality because he believed it to be a mutation (which to a degree I also believe) and didn't want then "dirtying" his master race.
wormer105 2 years ago
You're wrong. The second nuke was dropped on August 9. Japan offered to surrender on August 10. So no they did not surrender after the first nuke it was only after the second nuke. Truman did the right thing because we were running out of resources and Japan planned to continue fighting. He did what he had to do. The Iraq war, however, was completely unnecessary.
I wasn't talking about public prayer. I was talking about school teachers guiding students in prayer.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
opium: According to YOU the war was unnecessary. I however like my country to be without craters and not irradiated.
And let's ignore that a large number of Liberal power players we in agreement with it.
Your point of homosexuality is a talking point. Stop demonizing opposing beliefs.
Hitler ran a psuedo monarchy. One leader and able to appoint his replacment.
wormer105 2 years ago
There was never a threat of radiation and craters. There were no weapons of mass destruction.
My original point, which we've seem to have deviated from was that anti-war people tend to be liberal and pro-war people end to be conservative. The Nazis were certainly not anti-war.
I already told you I'm not demonizing your beliefs. I'm just saying that the Nazis were right wing extremists. One of their right wing characteristics was banning homosexuality.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Actually, liberals talk anti-war, but act like complete hawks. LBJ, Obama, Carter, Hitler, Stalin, Pol-Pot, etc., etc. Conservatives end wars, either on the battlefield, or sometimes without firing a single shot. I give you Ronald Reagan. Now it would seem that if you truly opposed war, you'd love Reagan's approach. Don't try giving me the G. Bush example either. He isn't a conservative. But that said, he's not liberal either. He won his wars, and planned the exit.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya I never said I supported any of those people so why would you bring them up?
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
Let me give you an analogy: What Hitler did would be kind of like the president taking office then taking advantage of the position by expanding the position's power until it was a dictatorial one. If the president were to do this, that wouldn't make our government a pseudo-monarchy. It would just mean that the president took advantage of his position in a conservative government.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte This is one of the most incoherent attempts at writing I've ever seen. What are you talking about? A conservative government? Are you a liberal? You sure act like one.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya It wasn't talking to you asshole. It would make sense if you looked at the whole conversation. When I said conservative government I meant limited government. Again I was referring to the fact that Hitler's original position was one of limited power. He turned Germany into a dictatorship.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
This whole argument is a quibble anyway. The idea that conservatives want limited government is a false one. Conservative actually want big government on military and social issues.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Yeah, the modern Republican party is pretty much the same as the Democrats, they are both neocons
ppshchik 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Conservatives want the most powerful means to protect the citizenry.. that probably includes even you.. from outside threats to our freedom. You do that via the military. Even you should be able to understand that simple logic. That's what the Constitution requires, by the way, of the central government, and not much more than that.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya That doesn't include banning homosexual marriage and continuing the war on drugs. It also doesn't include unnecessary wars. The founding fathers were isolationists. They would be appalled by the wars and by military spending.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Truman dropped the bomb because he thought it to be the most humane to do, for both sides. It had nothing to do with American resources, idiot.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya First off there was a reason they wanted to end the war. It was to prevent more soldiers from dying. Soldiers are a form of human resource. So resources are always an issue. I don't know why you would bring this up I don't disagree with the bombings.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
he also considered it dangerous to Germany's moral fiber but regardless of his motives banning homosexuality is far more conservative than liberal.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
conservative in being anti religious, pro abortion, pro keeping other races subjugated, pro national healthcare, anti business, pro government intervention in the market, pro government controlled means of production... then yes he was conservative... in a VERY LIBERAL DEMOCRAT way
mnalphamale 2 years ago
Hitler wasn't anti-religious moron. How many times do I have to explain this? The Nazi's belt buckle said "God with us" on it. Hitler made many references to his belief in God in Mein Kampf, including this one where he says "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord". Hitler also directly affirmed his Catholicism and criticized secular schools. How very religious of him.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
He done all of that, but what you fail to realize he was quite the opposite of what he preached. He done these things to be in favor for the German people. He denounced the Jewish people when he himself was Jewish. He proclaimed to be of the Aryan race when in fact he wasn't. He believed the German people had a right to their own property, but their property belonged to the Reich as he stated in a 1933 interview. He even compared the Nazis to Marxism and what is marxism?
DFSrlz 2 years ago
He wasn't Jewish. That's a myth.
He may have compared Nazism to marxism but it most certainly wasn't.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Last time I checked liberals are not pro-abortion. We are pro-choice.
Liberals don't subjugate races. It was actually conservative democrats who subjugated races.
Show me a source that confirms your claim that Hitler was pro national healthcare.
Hilter was not anti-business as he was a corporatist.
Next time you should try doing some research before you start pulling things out of your ass.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Hitler was not a corporatist, Mussolini was. Hitler was vehemently against free-trade policies, meaning he was anti-capitalist.
The Nazi party was technically the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Thus, Hitler was a socialist. Socialized healthcare, would thereby be something he, in some manner, agreed with.
Finally, liberals do subjugate races by creating racial status-quos for colleges and not hiring white firefighters because the black people failed the entrance test.
Zihark300 2 years ago
All you have done is set up a false dichotomy between Capitalism and socialism. The fact that he opposed free trade means nothing because i never claimed him to be a capitalist. You can oppose free trade and be a corporatist.
What Hitler certainly wasn't was a socialist. You're arguing that the Nazis were socialists because they called themselves socialists. This is obviously a non sequitur. If you can't see how fallacious that is I can't help you.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Not a socialist eh?
Recent research by academics such as Götz Aly has emphasized the role of the extensive Nazi social welfare programs that focused on providing employment for German citizens and insuring a minimal living standard for German citizens. Heavily focused on was the idea of a national German community.
According to the research of Robert N. Proctor for his book The Nazi War on Cancer, Nazi Germany had arguably the most powerful anti-tobacco movement in the world.
Zihark300 2 years ago
In 1935 the regime enacted the "Reich Nature Protection Act". While not a purely Nazi piece of legislation since parts of its influences pre-dated the Nazi rise to power, it nevertheless reflected Nazi ideology.
-From "How Green Were the Nazis?" by Jonathan Olsen
Zihark300 2 years ago
Gotz Aly has been heavily criticized by other historians. Apparently he thinks that Gandhi was a friend of Hitler. I'm not sure I can trust what this guy says.
Yes, there were environmentalist aspects of Nazi policy but that doesn't change the fact that Nazi policy had many right wing aspects such as there nationalism, there policy on homosexuality and Hitler's expansion of the military and expansionist foreign policy.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Enough with the propaganda. Right wing in he NAZI party has nothing to do with the modern Conservative principles in America. So quit trying to make that connection though your twisted (or ignorant) understanding of the word 'Right'. Get some education before shooting your mouth off. The real connection is socialism.. stateism, LIBERALISM! That's what the NAZIs and the modern Democrat party have in common. It destroys everything. It's a disease, and you have it!
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya I never said they were modern day conservatives. I just said they were on the right which they are.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte On the 'right' of what? Where's the context? People read your statement and they make a modern day connection. You do nothing to clear up the meaning based on 1930's/40's context. It's clear you're perfectly happy to have the perception that the term 'Right' means the same thing as Nazi. That's propaganda, and misinformation. Lucky I'm here to shatter your propaganda attempts.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Things like affirmative action don't subjugate races. If you look at the justification behind it it does the opposite. The purpose is to make up for the past subjugation of Black people which conservatives were at fault for. I don't agree with affirmative action but there is nothing about it that subjugates white people.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Hey jerk, modern day conservatives aren't for banning homosexuality. If you want to ignore the pitfalls, that's your perog. Just don't come to me later begging for money to fix your problems.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya No but conservatives are against gay rights. Are you suggesting that banning homosexuality isn't a right wing belief?
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
I never said that disagreeing with gay marriage is wrong and I never attacked you for your opinion. I simply pointed out that Hitler banned homosexuality because he considered it dangerous to the moral fiber of Germany. This bears a striking resemblance to conservative opinions on homosexuality. Before Hitler came to power Germany was one of the most liberal countries on gay marriage.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
thing about homosexuality is that it's against religious morals because in the bible it states the marriage is holy matrimony between and MAN and a WOMAN. not between men or between women. and the significance of the religious morals is because that's strictly what the constitution is, a document derived of old anglo-saxon laws, which is derived of ancient israeli law. the constitution may not be clear on gay marriage, but in the 10th amendment, each state has the right to gov itself as long as
TheAequitas0 2 years ago
the laws do not conflict with federal law, which is in the constitution, which does not touch on the subject of gay marriage, but it does race in the 13th and 14th amendment, which were never ratified. gay and race are different, because race is oriented around ethinicity, while gay is choice. so in all actuality, amendments that were never ratified are obsolete. however, the 13th and 14th amendments aren't so much about giving minorities equal rights, so much as giving the states power.
TheAequitas0 2 years ago
despite what the political parties believe on gay marriage, it is strictly an issue with the states alone, not the entire nation. and with a majority vote from the people of the states, laws may be amended as long as they do not conflict with laws of the constitution. essentially, gays are just citizens with as much rights as heteros. but minorities do not have a place in this white dominated society, because the 14th amendment is not an amendment, but a corruption of the constitution.
TheAequitas0 2 years ago
What the hell does believing that the Earth is overpopulated have to do with believing in a master race?
Also liberals don't want to take religion out of public. We just think that having teachers lead prayer in public school where people of all sorts of religions attend is antithetical to religious freedom. It's also a violation of the establishment clause because the teacher is paid with tax dollars to teach. Atheists, Muslims, jews etc. shouldn't have to pay for teachers to preach.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
that's what i was thinking when i watched his video. I'm a humanist/atheist (and i'm also black, which is rare, i know lol) and i'm very moderate and i see good points from both sides. i don't care what someone believes in as long as they don't go around kicking it in someone else's face. christians wouldn't want it happening to them! church and state is seperated for that very reason. i agree with malcom and rush on reliance and diversity, but i don't have faith in a "god". i believe in MYSELF.
docdoom187 2 years ago
I'm also an atheist and I agree that people can believe whatever they want and can express it in public but what makes me angry are people like Alan Keyes that support teacher guided prayer in public schools. That's just ridiculous to claim to be a supporter of religious freedom while at the same time trying to make prayer a part of public school which is attended by kids of all sorts of religious backgrounds. Not to mention non-Christian taxpayers will have to pay for this.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Keyes is a little world where only Christians are real Americans. Ishmael Jaffree, who happens to be black, is responsible for the law against this. Blacks and conservatives (both are extremely Christian) have demonized him because of that.
Many important people who happened to be non-religious are virtually forgotten in American history. The few who get mentioned (Fredrick Douglas, W.E.B. DuBois) are NEVER called humanist, atheist, etc, by the mainstream, because that would make them EVIL.
docdoom187 2 years ago
@docdoom187 Your wrong again. I really hope others aren't taking what you preach as fact.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte First off, public schools are unconstitutional. Second, I'm pretty sure that given the choice, catholic schools would outpace atheist schools in enrollments any day of the week. It's not even close.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya They are only unconstitutional if they are federal and not local which they aren't.
"catholic schools would outpace atheist schools in enrollments"
What's your point?
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
The Nazis weren't socialists either. They were corporatist. While corporatism can be a left or right ideology, the brand employed by Nazis was more to the right because they suppressed labor unions and served corporate interests.
It's true that Hitler was pro abortion but he certainly wasn't pro choice. He only allowed abortion for non-Aryan women and considered it the duty of Aryan mothers to raise children.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Please everyone, do your own research. You'll quickly see that this clown is wrong about practically everything. Again with the purposeful misrepresentation of the term 'Right'. It has nothing to do with American Conservatism. American Conservatives are 'Free Market Capitalists'. What's 'corporatism' anyway? If you mean government running companies, or owning them.. then there are specific terms for that. Crony capitalism, Fascism, communism.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya Crony capitalism is what we have in this country. Just look at the bailout or the fact that politicians are owned by corporate America. I'm not saying that this is the fault of real conservatives such as libertarians. It's the fault of people who believe corporations are people.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte I'll probably regret this but, here goes anyway... If a corporation is not people, then what is it? BTW, a 'real' conservative is not a libertarian.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Hitler didn't want to separate church and state you misinformed hack. The Nazis belt buckle said "God with us" on it. Hitler also stated that he thought he was doing the work of the almighty creator in mein Kamf. Hitler did the exact opposite of take religion out of government, he used religion to accomplish political goals which is reminiscent of Bush saying he believes that God wants everyone to be free to justify the Iraq war.
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte Wow, now your trying to compare Hitler's twisted believe system with Bush doctrine. By the way, God probably does want everyone to 'freely pursue their interests', within the constraints of virtue and morality. God did, after all, create men equal, which means no man should be slave to another. Don't you believe that? Or do you think it's ok for one man to rule over another? Stop telling us what you think everyone else believes, and tell us what you believe.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
@jrspike2ya Hitler was clearly motivated by religion. That's all I'm saying.
opiumofthetroglodyte 1 month ago
@opiumofthetroglodyte What religion was that? Where's that documented, the record of this motivating religion.
jrspike2ya 1 month ago
Comment removed
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
Liberals have no substance to there arguements, so they have to resort to calling people racist, homophobes, nazis and sexist to demonize the opposition. They ignore facts and cherry pick truths to further there agenda. They dream of a world with no money, religion or countries, but what they dont realize is human beings by nature have an ego and a lust for money and power. And if give Liberals these you will see how hipocritical they really are. (michael Moore) (ted kennedy)....etc
Userofname69 2 years ago
I'm white. I don't support President Obama's policies. But I supported Alan Keys run for President. According to liberals, since I don't support President Obama, that makes me a racist. How can that be if I want Alan Keys to be President instead of Barak Obama?
jrh1959a 2 years ago
Amen brother.
Rawk4Life 2 years ago
Martin Luther King was a republican.
Adolph Hitler was a socialist/fascist. He was a great orator. He nationalized many German industries. He then initiated the conflicts that started WWII (although our guy hasn't yet done that, but soon enough).
rintintinification 2 years ago 12
Comment removed
opiumofthetroglodyte 2 years ago
@rintintinification
...libya
omeca 9 months ago
i am all about breaking it in four...i can't wait. please keeping posting your videos they are great.
poetictam 2 years ago
He met joe da plumber yall! He said the dude is chill! He seems like he has ur vote already! Joe da plumber has stated he dont wanna be famous(or does he), why u usin his name to get u some fame?
shoes1922 2 years ago
I for one refuse to have the benefits of my labor reaped by a corporation with absolutely none of my interests at heart.
One day this entire world is going to be run by a single power and I wonder what you democrats and republicans will have to argue about then...
IgNoRaNcEbLoWs 2 years ago
Dude the Democratic and Republic parties are both just different ways to gain power and abuse it for some other interest that has nothing to do with the interests of the population.
If you think things like free market will be beneficial in any way to our economy then you are completely blind and naive.
I can go on for days about how all you peons can do is talk about your freedoms and liberties while in truth, you dont have shit. You are a slave to corporation and are abused by a higher power
IgNoRaNcEbLoWs 2 years ago
Nothing initiates a left-winger's fight-or-flight instinct worse than FACTS.
backwoodsninja 2 years ago
Comment removed
seltian 2 years ago
he sltian, you people are always banning people deleting comments when you lose arguments eh? you must know deep down that you are wrong, sad really.
derbulldog 2 years ago
the nazi's were evil because the used lies propaganda and fear to persuade the people to do what they wanted them to do, and silenced their opposition. most immoral.
derbulldog 2 years ago
Joseph Kony?
natdavi 2 years ago
Excellent point, Zo. Here's some more ammo for your arsenal: What about all the black folks who voted for Obama simply because he is black? Is that not just as racist as a white person not voting for him for the same reason?
backwoodsninja 2 years ago
Indeed it is, brother.
Mauhadeeb28 2 years ago
Why should black folk vote for a black man simply becuz he's black? Why should so-called "real americans" vote for mccain, simply becuz he went to war? U dont think black folk would'nt understand why white people went for a white guy? Those black folk that saw the racism in the 60's, who didnt know racism until they felt it, u can call them racists, becuz they probably are, just like the whites in the 60's who didnt want segregation! They are still here, and the black guys are still here!
shoes1922 2 years ago
My point is that racism is destructive no matter what side it's on. I disagree with Obama's politics, not his skin color. I simply believe it to be misguided for a black person to support Obama because he is black, having no knowledge of his political views. If you know where he stands politically, and you support him, more power to you. If you support him based on race, that's sad.
backwoodsninja 2 years ago 29
For white people to be bitter with the fact that a "black man" wanted to see a "black man" in office!! Its easy to say wait, when u've been had ur fill!
shoes1922 2 years ago
It's not the fact that he's black, it's the fact that he's a liberalist bigot and pro-abortionist. And there are black conservatives, such as Condoleeza Rice and Alan Keyes. The Democratic whites would have been just as upset had Keyes been President. Not because he's black, but because he stands for everything they don't stand for.
Rawk4Life 2 years ago
panderall? lol I love it! yopu rock Zo!
Zo for President!
gumpandjennay 2 years ago
I complain about the same liberal crap all the time. But I get their well prepared reply... Shut Up.
hdl13 2 years ago 2
Hey don't talk bad about us. SHUT UP!!!
:0P
Mauhadeeb28 2 years ago
Make me.
hdl13 2 years ago
Shut up, you stupid conservative!!!
This message has been brought to you by Obama and friends.
Mauhadeeb28 2 years ago
Nice retort.
hdl13 2 years ago
Wait... don't act like your on my side you crazy right wing extremist! You obviously don't get it. You conservatives are the reason that.. I mean.. it's your fault that...well if it weren't for you we would... you just dont get it. SHUT UP!!!!!
Mauhadeeb28 2 years ago
i hope im not the onyl one picking up on your little parody.
its pretty funny :)
PaintballOwnager 2 years ago
OMG! Someone got it! I mean, shut up you fascist!
Mauhadeeb28 2 years ago
I can't agree with that view of the 2 party system as a good thing, or it almost felt like you were thinking a 1 party system would be better? I'd rather vote for the best person for the job irregardless of ethnicity or gender, and political party. I don't like the idea that basically I only have two options, it's like.. Time for your black eye, left or right? Well, to tell you the truth I'd rather not get punched in either eye..
sniperp3 2 years ago
You r awesome, man! Keep it up! Liberals would rather save a serial rapist than an innocent fetus..
bscogin07 2 years ago 5
Shut up!
Compliments of the DNC
Mauhadeeb28 2 years ago
I believe the phrase "sell out" rings just about right. But hey, if this is how he feels he needs to swing it, in order to get that "white" vote, then go for it my friend. It's just sad to watch.
45thronin 2 years ago
why is it that liberals always name call and never debate the ISSUES?
hammbrick 2 years ago
you are awesome. I wish you had a national platform, we need more people like you speaking on behave of conservative values. I have been watching your videos for about 2 hours and as a conservative and it is refreshing to find a conservative who are agree with 98% of the time (the 2% is attributed to our disagreement on gay marriage; on this issue we disagree but I respect your position). Thank you for your videos, I pray that your voice is heard on a national level.
NadegeP1 2 years ago
I wish i was in ur class
Blitzbrave17 2 years ago
any person that is in the house or senate that belongs to or upholds the progressive ideology needs to be brought up for impeachment.
and escorted out of any Governmental building (except prison) never to return again.
oilrod2 2 years ago
You rock, dude. You gonna be at the next tea party?
skogenburzum 2 years ago
Keep it up patriot! All I see are negative comments posted about what you have to say. Don't let those discourage you. You know you're over the target when the flack is the thickest! God Bless America!!!!!
jeremy0184 2 years ago 3
[Stands for National Socialist Reform Party in German]
And yet, those who more closely identify with the NAZIs are on the Right Wing.
funkbrother216 2 years ago
Did you not listen to this fine video? go to 3:40 in the video Zo talks about the similarities of Hitler, the Nazis, and the left.
Quandar9 2 years ago
Exactly, that's why N.A.Z.I.
Stands for National Socialist Reform Party
in German
great vid, macho
thundor777 2 years ago
your a good speaker but you have one problem, your not credible, ive read alot of books on the topics you discuss in your videos and you leave out alot of facts that would...well..destroy your argument, in future videos could you give references from reliable sources, it would help you alot!
pacman3102000 2 years ago
Wrong again. Rush Limbaugh is fighting accusations that he's the leader of the "Republican Party". Don't pretend like this is about his position as head of the Conservative Movement, which is not in dispute. Also, Rush and his ilk continues to blast Malcolm X and Dr. King as racists and communists for stressing black capitalism and government independence. Dude, you're just a by-the-numbers neocon spinster. You would be humiliated if you ever tried to engage anyone with that.
funkbrother216 2 years ago
wtf? I've never heard Rush Limbaugh once call Malcolm X and Dr. King racist and I've listened to his show for years. FYI theres no such thing as "black capitalism" it's just capitalism.
sakonhagakure 2 years ago
He called Malcolm X racist and called Dr. King a communist. Call in and ask him yourself.
funkbrother216 2 years ago
Hmmm...dipping into the pockets of the wealthy to spread the wealth around. Well, that's what Palin did when she forced the oil companies to pay dividends to certain Alaskans. What does that make her? To me, that makes her one of us libs. That and the 500million in earmarks she spent on her state. You know? Palin isn't so bad after all.
funkbrother216 2 years ago
What you don't understand is that she considers the natural resources of Alaska BELONG TO ALASKANS. As the people of Alaska, they have a right to profit off the resources of the state.
zeruty 2 years ago
I agree with that, zeruty. But don't start yelling SOCIALISM or WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION when a progressive goes by that same principal.
funkbrother216 2 years ago
The difference is that the oil belonged to the Alaska. The money being taken from "the rich" does not belong to "the poor".
You left out a mighty big fact which is typical for a liberal trying to make a point.
medic1025 2 years ago
Than by that principal, the money made by the rich oil companies should belong to the rich oil companies. On the other hand, if our natural resources belong to all citizens than all citizens should share in it's profit. You attempt to have it both ways with your comment.
funkbrother216 2 years ago
That is absolutely more stupid than your original comment. Who said the rich are making their money using state owned natural resources. You don't have a clue how to defend your position so please stop because your ignorance becomes more obvious with each post.
medic1025 2 years ago
you need your own radio show, i'd listen to you religiously as i do levin and rush!
LKitsyK 2 years ago
LOL, your right Real, "You can't fix stupid" - Ron White.... best line I ever heard :~)
Ferwin 2 years ago
The problem with the Republican Party, after this last election, was that they did NOT stick to their principals of Fiscal responsibility and avoidance of Imperialism. This alienated no small number of the Libertarian conservatives. Bush had no problem with Stimulus.
caltrop69 2 years ago
oh hey according to D L, there was no crime in LA before Ronald Reagan... according to DL Ronald Reagan created the crime in LA
73GunMan 2 years ago
Malcolm X was racist (anti-Semite) I don't believe Rush Limbaugh is a racist....So it would be nice not to compare the two.
KyleClarkUSA 2 years ago
lol, liberals are more Hitler-like the the great ol' Rush!
ForceSmart 2 years ago