actually religion is in some countries to day like in the Philippines is detrimental becoz people comes to engross to praying rather just helping ech other out.
as for Q5: Pascal said: "Humans never do such evil so complete and cheerfully than through religious convictions." this god killed 40children because a monk prayed for it, after they made fun of his bald head, the reason for passover, and last but not least the inquisition, salem witch hunts and abortion clinic bombing/killings, not to mention the antedeluvian periond. relion and the religious are closed minded, they want to do away with what comes natural to being human.
If this God THING appeared before I would ask...why the genocide, infanticide, matricide, eco-cide. Why the killings in general when something like you, being so powerful that you can end all existence, (so i hear) lower yourself to the human condition when you, of all things should be the one to practice what you preach, you, of all things should be above it all. Above killings, yet this devil never murdered anyone, is it safe to say satan is a trickster, but he's no murdering hypocrite?
And yet you are saved reconcilled to God, but because of unbelief, and therefore not participating in his salvation and reconcilation, personally. your instead angry. But guess what, it doesn't matter.READ John 12:32: "But I [Jesus], when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself." 2 Corinthians 5:14: "Christs love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died." You are saved, never mind everybody else.
I used to be an Atheist, but not anymore. I have found religion. I will tell you how it happened. I dressed up as a pirate last Halloween, and then god came before and gave me a bowl of ramen. . . . . .It was tasty ramen! . . . . It changed my life!
Dude seriously? You think we evolved a single celled organism? So everything is just an accident like how the human body works that's all an accident? God made us. And you say the bible is made by man? Even with todays technology no one could make a book as smart.
Really if God mad eus perfect what do you say to the man in asia with tree stump on his neck. Or the people all over the world with those little mutations called tumors. Christians get cancer why?
And the bible is not smart. Even Dr. Suess books have consistanc but the bible can't even decide if jesus is god or god's son. at one point "My father and i are one" John 10:30
yet leter on "My father is greater than I" John 14:28
I know that the comment wasn't aimed to me, however....Biblical Ignorance is to blame, I can give you an answer for all, as context/translation to English/lack of knowledge-meanings are the main causes. Pick 5 and i will explain them. Atheistic websites and utube are not the best sources of obtaining knowledge. Most condemn without research, and most have explanations for the misunderstandings.
300+ bishops put 'books' together known today as the bible. The ones w/o or with little credit were discarded. 'Context' is the meaning of certain words and their descriptions in the scripts, the correct meanings. What I stated below is people interpt and take scripts 'out' of context, for they do not understand their true meanings.
The translation of Hebrew/Greek to English and some of the words not existing in English doesn't help either. Purest form are in the ancient languages, lost in translation and man's interpts spoil much. Study of the books and what they mean is what God wants, to follow/learn and search for what is to be known and revealed..
As humans strive for knowledge and mastery over our universe. We have gained knowledge to the point we manipulate the very building blocks of matter. We are well on our way to building a race of beings below us that we believe will surpass our own in intellect and physical ability (robotics). Why is it so hard to believe that this thing has been done before?
@h2omanz You don't understand atheism. Atheists don't try to disprove gods existance, we just dont believe he does. Christians, however believe in the unproven and irrational.
So if you're an atheist, I am probably safe to assume you believe in evolution and abio as the explanation of our existence? If so then no lab nor has anything been proven within nature to evolve. And sasquatch and soup man is proven and rational.....lol.
So you don't probably believe there was an ice age with mammoths, which are hairy elephants of which exist carvings in caves which evolve this way to survice and then when there was no need....what Am I trying to do, you will never even think about it little bit.
1.Ice age yes, but do not believe it lasted millions of years. The bible talks in detail of the ice age after the flood. Study demonstrates that the Woolly mammoths were not designed to live in extremely cold climates. Though it is true they do have fur, this fur was designed for moderate or cool climates not freezing ones. Since they are actual proof due to fossilization it is obvious they existed, the species was created as only one basic elephant,
@h2omanz True but nobody has declared evolution as a law. Christians however push god on others with absolute certainty that he is real and there is not an ounce of proof to back them.
The proof for a christian god exists only in one single book. Yet the experiments, research and backing for a theory on evolution has more data and observable connections recorded in more scientific journals and books that reach the thousands. God's proof is so insignificant its sad to see you think the opposite. Research for a god has been under way for thousands of years and it has produced nothing, research on evolution has only been collected for 3 centuries and it is much more credible.
Again you don't know proof exists because you have never searched. Bias, you conclude that there is no evidence, when there is plenty. As far as proof in a lab, are you talking about adding radiation and other means to produce mutations, of flies and bacterium?Mutations do occur, but in unnatural ways, but the species remains the same, not one shred of proof that anything becomes anything but itself. The backing of evolution?
A theory will never become a law, and a law never was a theory. A scientific fact is an observable natural occurrence; a scientific theory is an attempt to explain how this natural occurrence works; and, a scientific law is a mathematical description of this natural occurrence.
Technically, evolution has been proven: the HIV virus reproduces at such a fast rate that it can evolve and adapt through natural selection to newly introduced antibodies and medicines designed to combat the virus. If things didn't evolve, HIV wouldn't pose a problem at all because we'd have found some treatment that kills it completely, but it's because the virus evolves through natural selection and adapts, that every new treatment (there's about 20) has been rendered ineffective.
Technically Micro evo is the only proven side(adaptation/variances), the rest is what science calls fact w/o proof, Its accurate to say that science has yet to provide consistent answers to how evolution operates at the molecular, genetic, or even ecological levels in a consistent and supportable way. The 'history' of evolution is where the REAL EVIDENCE lay, not modern science attempting to make a 150 yr old unscientific belief work.
"If so then no lab nor has anything been proven within nature to evolve"
There is more evidence for the theory of evolution than the theory of gravity, whoever told you that, doesnt know what they are talking about, or are lieing.
Evolution is a scientific theory, that means it only exsists because it has yet to be disproven, if you hear something is a theory, then say it hasnt been proven, it is like saying the sky is blue, but it hasnt been proven.
There are so many gaps,flaws,disposed theories, hoaxes, the concealed, the unexplained, that makes evolution a joke. If you want proof of God let me know and I will PM to you.
The words "proof" and "god" should never be used in the same sentence. The proof of god is one single book written by men that is no more relevant than any other religions holy book.
So by this you believe everyone one earth that isnt christian is going to hell? Islam, Hindu, Buddhist, Traditional Chinese, and even those who are non aware of even a sense that there may be a god and totally innocent? People who live their lives justly and properly will go to hell because all they know is allah?
Not for me to judge. God I'm sure God will look at the heart if 'the word' was never presented,(bush man, rice farmers etc..). But those that have and refuse, I believe will be condemned to Hell.
Well the over whelming evidence for the Bible is proof for me, as the Koran does not. But if Allah is real then i would hope for mercy just as I would hope for muslims if my God is real.
Yeah what exactly make the bible better than the quran or the torah espcially considerign the bible bites from the toruh and many major theme's in christianity (virgin births, ressurections, demi gods, sacrifices) are themes that have been apart of many other religions plenty of whom came before christianity?
Or how about this why is it that chirstianity only began once Jesus died. Why are you christian when jesus himself wasn't. Why didn't jesus try to start christianty while living?
The Koran is nothing more than an ancient version of Mormonism. Copied from Christianity and revised through the Islamic prophet Muhammad, just as Joseph Smith Jr. did with Mormonism. Both had no witnesses(odd), they both state that they were visited by angels to give the real truths of God. When in fact the Bible warns against any angel giving new testament to Gods words differ than what is stated in the Bible.
Christianity copies no religion. If you are stating 'fact' from the Zeitgeist movie
Okay seriously There's just asmuch proof for any one of those gods as there is for the abrahamic one. As amatter of fact there's more because they have an origin there are tons of documented stories from first hand accounts. Sculptures.
But sure go ahead and PM me with this crucial info.
I never said that the worshiping of those gods didn't exist, because they did. The others do not have the backing of the Bible, the genealogies all line up(all the way back to Abraham), the characters, events, history, locations, wars, civilizations, writings, prophesies, archaeology findings all have unbelievable proof of accuracy----
, the manuscripts are close to 24.000 in count,no other book or ancient book in the world and in history has come close.
Are you serious? Greek Mythology goes from generations of demigod children all the way to the parents of the gods the titans. Genealogies mean nothing.
Every religion has clearly stated and easily referenced locations.
Go to Greece or Egypt or India and I garuntee you'll find tours that will tak eyou to all of the religious hot spots.
What archeological finding with unbelievable archeological proof of accuracy has christianity found?
Their is proof of 'an' ark. There is one vid on my page that shows an ark with extraordinary similarities. Same size, rooms, resting location etc....Found in the fifties.
Again the cities don't prove God. Just that it's another piece of evidence that is accurate and consistant with the Bible.
Thanks for rewarding me a great job, much appreciated.
2. and such you have bought into the lie of the movie. I can PM you the truth of the other religions(real sources such as links to university libraries) how the prophets in the Bible predict such things as a virgin birth, resurrection, etc 400-1500years prior to religions/gods such as Baal, Horus, Krisha, Mithra, Attis etc..
Jesus came to fulfill the law of mankind, Christianity began from the teachings of Christ and the way He came to save mankind.
We can trust what the Bible says about authorship, but we must be careful to be sure that it is saying what we believe it to be saying. Accurate info on authorship assists us with interpretation by giving the work a setting in history, a context which is the background of interpretation.Normally ancient authors used secretaries to write their works. Sometimes we know the names of these secretaries. For example, Tertius wrote Romans (Rom 16:22) and Silas (or Silvanus) probably wrote 1 Peter
No there is not, sorry a young earth creation demand to close your eyes a not see overwhelming evindence. One question, If earth and the universe is young why there are stars whose light traveled to earth for milions of years? How come?
1. again i have info i can forward to you about the young earth
and actually causes you to open your eyes
as far as the stars, outta 100 trillion stars(maybe more) there should be stars born all the time,according to science and due to the fact that the stars are at differ ages(millions to develop and billions before death), yet never has a birth been seen only death
if God exists and made the heavens and the earth He has made everything at an advance stage, correct?
have plenty to explain about God, but was asking you why atheism is correct
can send in more detail to your page if you wish...
Some say that Jesus was a myth, that He was not a historical figure. These people maintain that no credible evidence exists that would substantiate His historicity. But nothing can be further from the truth. There is actually better historical evidence for the existence of Jesus and what Christians believe about Him than for just about any ancient historical figure.
@h2omanz "what proof do you have that atheism is correct?" - atheism isn't a positive position, its a rejection of theism. you cant have proof of atheism any more than you can have proof that santa claus doesn't exist. your question is illogical.
We had a convo about 5mos ago via pm if you don't remember. In regards to your remark if you span back over a year ago in the comments, you'd see my question of 'what proof that atheism is correct' is a response to me being asked 'what proof that the Judeo God is the correct god'. Atheism relies on materialistic God rejecting faith, if you can't prove that atheism is the right choice by rejecting God, not really a solid choice, faith based just like any religion. Santa Syndrome.
@h2omanz "Atheism relies on materialistic God rejecting faith," - no, atheism is the rejection of theism. it doesn't rely on anything. if you are asking of its the right choice to reject theistic claims then yes it is, as none of them have any evidence. that is, there is no evidence of god.
If you reject God then one 'must rely' on 'faith' that God doesn't exist, and the fact that our existences is due to materialism/natural causes, that or aliens.lol. If atheism doesn't rely on anything as you stated than logically, it goes against reason and common sense. You must 'rely' that all the evidence is wrong nor doesn't exists.
There is plenty of evidence that points to God, we already had this discussion, but is pointless when a bias has already predetermined is validity.
@h2omanz evidence? -looks around- i see no evidence -looks in bible- i only see ink and paper -looks at a human- hmm i see no simularitys -looks at apes- oh there it is
You wont see what you don't want to, no similarity between ink/paper and man...perceptive
Ranting with a few(at most)yrs of study on the subject is suppose to be laudable? Study the subject for another 20yrs and hit me up, only then will someone ruminatively consider your opinion.
I dont' want to be on this page, so if you 'must' reply in PM
@h2omanz 1. Because you lack evidence for the claim that a god exists. 2. A loving god would make me cry for mercy? 3. An infinite penalty for a finite crime? 4. Limited vision is not a good case for proving there's a god. That's hiring a blind man to prove the color red exists.
1.God encourages you to test His word to prove He is who He says He is, nothing lacking. 2. Was a response to LukyHell that on judgment day his boastful pride he relies on today will be shattered. 3. All of mankind is heading for hell, Christ is the only one that can save you from it, you send yourself. A loving God offers a way to avoid eternal punishment 4. Wasn't a proof nor was it used as a case, you took it out of context. Last comment, stawman ammo, with no bearing.
@h2omanz 1.You have no evidence for god's existence.2.God is threatened by pride? I thought he was "all powerful." 3. God could have not make hell in the first place, so NO one would have to go.4.There's no proof, either way, no matter HOW you look at it.
I can answer all of those 4, but only one at a time. First one; If I never heard or felt love before, don't believe it exists, believe it is made up, how do you tell me it is real? will you tell me that it is as real as the nose on my face? That it can be experienced and therefore known. So tell me how do you prove to me love exists and is real? For argument sake, I don't believe it exists there is no proof, either way, no matter HOW you look at it.
@h2omanz Love can be observed, otherwise, what are you talking about? However, that doesn't prove god exists. Straw man aside, you have no evidence for God's existence, plain and simple. Provide testable, objective evidence for god's existence.
Not really a strawman as I will prove my point, after you answer or attempt. So again people believing in God and worshiping Him can be observed, doesnt mean its real either, as love being observed is not proved to be genuine. So again love doesnt exist, prove to me its real
@h2omanz Love can be observed through brains scans, when testing for them. Love can actually be "mapped" so to speak. God cannot. Bad argument.It is a straw man, because you haven't provided evidence for god's existence. The same request can be made:prove to me god is real.
Quit jumping the gun, you want evidence I will give it, you are too impatient .I already stated I would explain why it relates. Not setting up a strawman.From what I understand pleasure and pain is what is measured in the scans, not love. So again I dont believe in it and you havent proven it to me yet. I have to run, take your time, if you want and can, give me some good hard evidence. I can get back to you later
@h2omanz You understood wrong. The subjects that were selected were already committed, plenty of time to produce the chemicals ( dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin) to indicate activity. There's also the pair-bonding chemical, oxytocin, which inhibits long-lasting relationships. Again, none of this is related to the existence of god. My "patience" is irrelevant. I'm asking for evidence, and you have still provided none.
1.Sorry but 'my' patience in explaining is relevant as I am making a point of how God is known. And am willing to show you how, if its too slow than move on, maybe you don't really want to know. Also you probably will deny all nor take the steps needed to find the truth, as your mind/heart has already decided. It will require laying down your pride as well, this is where most fail.
2.If you do want to cont..All these studies are not evidence, they are small, preliminary studies and experiments, and the studies always state: this new study 'suggests'. Oxytocin is released in response to stress or stimuli, and social bonding/attachment/communication is not proof of love. Dopamine is associated with pleasures via sex, music, food/hunger/cravings. Nothing conclusive here that love is real. So what you presented is not proof.
@h2omanz That's not evidence. That's just more distraction from the main objective for showing evidence for god's existence. You never mentioned "impatience" until I asked, directly, for evidence. Still nothing.
Waiting for my evidence that love is real, remember I stated that I was making a point. Let me know when you can, as I have nothing from you and so far you have given zero evidence.
@h2omanz I already GAVE you the evidence. If you need it AGAIN, just look up Dr Donatella Marazziti, psychiatrist at the University of Pisa. However, even there was no evidence, this has absolutely nothing to do with evidence for the existence of god. Another straw man, yet again.
Love can be observed, otherwise, what would you be talking about? But straw man, aside, this doesn't prove god's existence. Plain and simple: you don't have evidence for a claim about god's existence, and neither does anyone else.
it seems your saying I do not understand God so He does not exist, so please explain nuclear fact(not theory that would be a guess) My infant does not understand me that would mean I don't exist.I do believe in science but all knowing God not giving proper eyes to animals makes no sense. And man would die out in evo. so thare must be more involved. Christianity never harmed any one evil people claiming to be something they are not has.
I care for my child his mother was adopted at birth does her mother not exist. About the eyes we were made in the image of a spritual being. A major arguement I here is I don't understand so God is wrong or he isn't real, which would mean only what we understand is, that is the most child like thinking I've heard.
You entered the realm of fantasy and the only thing you have is blind faith.
I don't say I don't understand god, I say there is none, you don't need him for any part of your life and the only difference is in your head and and your believe.
1-I have more than blind faith. 2-Major flood would dilute salt years of rain would wash it into the sea(thts how it get salty in the first place)3-Humans imply evo.theory is wrong(a hairless ape that can hardly hear, smell, see, run, jump, climb, dig, or fight seems like alion snack)4-I have seen miracles(done by a former ranger, all at no cost,to show God can save anyone)5- God is not man so not held to human limits. Running out of room please deal with you anger.
2-If the flood causes the fresh water to be salty then rain wouldnt move the salt any where. Thats why no matter how much it rains in salt lake city, the lake is still salty. 3-humans arent hairless apes, they are humans and cousins to apes. A dog seems like a punk compared to its cousin the wolf too, but dogs are doing just fine.5-God is held to human limits in one sense, he cannot control himself emotionally, and we see this over and over again throughout the bible.
2-super genius ever heard the thoery of erosion, rain erodes or washes minerals like salt into rivers and then into larger bodies like oceans (study science)5-I've always wonered how liberal know what God thinks and feel, no one else can.
Man would not die out in evolution, actually evolution perfectly explains our prosperity. We were givin the ability to adapt on the fly (use tools, Make coats). Thus, we are at an advantage towards every other animal in the forest. Go to africa and watch a tribe hunt with nothing but spears and slings. They can bring down and animal using the most important tool that evolution gave us. Our brains!!!
Have problems dealind with public input? Natural lakes, ponds and swamps do not permently hold water they have an inlet and outlet. Please study grade school science.
You are EXTREMELY spiritually hungry,CLEARLY your evolutionist views have not quenched your hunger,and NOTHING else ever will.If you want to know why hell exists,read the book of Revelations,the first line of which is "The revelation of Jesus Christ" he summed it up in Mathew 22;29 Ye Err not knowing the scriptures or the power of God!!You will NEVER have" rest" in anything else but your manufacturer and his word!NEVER
Miracles have happed lives have been saved God has helped EVERYONE who has asked and still does. You can be forgiven for any sins and Hell was created for sinners and those who try to put themselves in Gods place like Satan for example. He does love all of us we are his children. God works in mysterious ways he does protect millions he does help millions and if he stood in front of you, you would fall to your knee's and ask forgivness for all you've said and done. One day he will show himself.
Then you will go bow to your gold statue and call that a god. theres a good reason why you havent seen any miracles. you might ask God to prove himself to you but He doesnt hav to. the bible says that if you fall off a cliff God will lift you up, but if you test Him and jump, well, looks like your on your own.
I dont bow to the bible. And you cannot break me down. call me crazy or watevr u want to. but even if God WASNT real you have to admit(altho u wudnt know) that WHOEVER rote the bible had to be pretty damn smart.
people shouldnt have to ask a perfect god to help them out of the suffering that he designed to come true realization? theres something bigger than the cult of theism.
actually religion is in some countries to day like in the Philippines is detrimental becoz people comes to engross to praying rather just helping ech other out.
acidsnake8 8 months ago
Russian legend
BOROLAD345 8 months ago
Go Roosters!
JustinLB82 1 year ago
So why do you believe in "something" anyway?
Yeah, the bible god is stupid. Why do you need to keep some of those characteristics?
De4sher 1 year ago
as for Q5: Pascal said: "Humans never do such evil so complete and cheerfully than through religious convictions." this god killed 40children because a monk prayed for it, after they made fun of his bald head, the reason for passover, and last but not least the inquisition, salem witch hunts and abortion clinic bombing/killings, not to mention the antedeluvian periond. relion and the religious are closed minded, they want to do away with what comes natural to being human.
togaida 1 year ago
If this God THING appeared before I would ask...why the genocide, infanticide, matricide, eco-cide. Why the killings in general when something like you, being so powerful that you can end all existence, (so i hear) lower yourself to the human condition when you, of all things should be the one to practice what you preach, you, of all things should be above it all. Above killings, yet this devil never murdered anyone, is it safe to say satan is a trickster, but he's no murdering hypocrite?
togaida 1 year ago
you fuckin suck, retard.
22cole85 1 year ago
And how do u feel about JEWS?
funus0888 1 year ago
@funus0888 ask hitler
22cole85 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And yet you are saved reconcilled to God, but because of unbelief, and therefore not participating in his salvation and reconcilation, personally. your instead angry. But guess what, it doesn't matter.READ John 12:32: "But I [Jesus], when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself." 2 Corinthians 5:14: "Christs love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died." You are saved, never mind everybody else.
aoghiroshima 1 year ago
I used to be an Atheist, but not anymore. I have found religion. I will tell you how it happened. I dressed up as a pirate last Halloween, and then god came before and gave me a bowl of ramen. . . . . .It was tasty ramen! . . . . It changed my life!
Sorry, I had to. I'm just kidding of course.
Nice video. Your accent is awesome by the way.
SolitudesGrace 1 year ago
High five dude. Nice logic.
crimsonmonie 1 year ago
Dude seriously? You think we evolved a single celled organism? So everything is just an accident like how the human body works that's all an accident? God made us. And you say the bible is made by man? Even with todays technology no one could make a book as smart.
supra442 2 years ago
Really if God mad eus perfect what do you say to the man in asia with tree stump on his neck. Or the people all over the world with those little mutations called tumors. Christians get cancer why?
And the bible is not smart. Even Dr. Suess books have consistanc but the bible can't even decide if jesus is god or god's son. at one point "My father and i are one" John 10:30
yet leter on "My father is greater than I" John 14:28
you think god likes green eggs and ham?
ColinRayko 2 years ago
@supra442
You think the Bible is a smart book? 220 examples that say otherwise: unexplainable.n et/artman/publish/article_1494.shtml
(remove the space)
MooWentCow 1 year ago
@MooWentCow
I know that the comment wasn't aimed to me, however....Biblical Ignorance is to blame, I can give you an answer for all, as context/translation to English/lack of knowledge-meanings are the main causes. Pick 5 and i will explain them. Atheistic websites and utube are not the best sources of obtaining knowledge. Most condemn without research, and most have explanations for the misunderstandings.
h2omanz 1 year ago
@h2omanz
how can you provide "context" for a bible put together from many scriptures during the council of Nicea?
lollercaust 1 year ago
@lollercaust
300+ bishops put 'books' together known today as the bible. The ones w/o or with little credit were discarded. 'Context' is the meaning of certain words and their descriptions in the scripts, the correct meanings. What I stated below is people interpt and take scripts 'out' of context, for they do not understand their true meanings.
remark because you took it out of context.
h2omanz 1 year ago
@h2omanz yes, since the books were put together as a single story when they were different stories "context" is meaningless.
plus "perfect word of god" needs context? you'd think it should be pretty clear and simple to understand.
in fact, it should transcend language.
but hey...what do I know right?
lollercaust 1 year ago
@lollercaust
The translation of Hebrew/Greek to English and some of the words not existing in English doesn't help either. Purest form are in the ancient languages, lost in translation and man's interpts spoil much. Study of the books and what they mean is what God wants, to follow/learn and search for what is to be known and revealed..
h2omanz 1 year ago
As humans strive for knowledge and mastery over our universe. We have gained knowledge to the point we manipulate the very building blocks of matter. We are well on our way to building a race of beings below us that we believe will surpass our own in intellect and physical ability (robotics). Why is it so hard to believe that this thing has been done before?
weslingm 2 years ago
2......trees, seas, stars, man, animals, planets etc.......therefore stars would be visible
you still havent answered my question from my first email
what proof do you have that atheism is correct, you answered the question with a question
-respect
h2omanz 2 years ago
@h2omanz You don't understand atheism. Atheists don't try to disprove gods existance, we just dont believe he does. Christians, however believe in the unproven and irrational.
Berramus 2 years ago
So if you're an atheist, I am probably safe to assume you believe in evolution and abio as the explanation of our existence? If so then no lab nor has anything been proven within nature to evolve. And sasquatch and soup man is proven and rational.....lol.
h2omanz 2 years ago
So you don't probably believe there was an ice age with mammoths, which are hairy elephants of which exist carvings in caves which evolve this way to survice and then when there was no need....what Am I trying to do, you will never even think about it little bit.
LukyHell 2 years ago
1.Ice age yes, but do not believe it lasted millions of years. The bible talks in detail of the ice age after the flood. Study demonstrates that the Woolly mammoths were not designed to live in extremely cold climates. Though it is true they do have fur, this fur was designed for moderate or cool climates not freezing ones. Since they are actual proof due to fossilization it is obvious they existed, the species was created as only one basic elephant,
h2omanz 2 years ago
2. with the genetic potential to produce all the different varieties we have recorded up to today, just as a great dane is to a chihuahua.
h2omanz 2 years ago
@h2omanz True but nobody has declared evolution as a law. Christians however push god on others with absolute certainty that he is real and there is not an ounce of proof to back them.
Berramus 2 years ago
Theres more proof for God than evolution.
h2omanz 2 years ago
The proof for a christian god exists only in one single book. Yet the experiments, research and backing for a theory on evolution has more data and observable connections recorded in more scientific journals and books that reach the thousands. God's proof is so insignificant its sad to see you think the opposite. Research for a god has been under way for thousands of years and it has produced nothing, research on evolution has only been collected for 3 centuries and it is much more credible.
Berramus 2 years ago
@B
1.
Again you don't know proof exists because you have never searched. Bias, you conclude that there is no evidence, when there is plenty. As far as proof in a lab, are you talking about adding radiation and other means to produce mutations, of flies and bacterium?Mutations do occur, but in unnatural ways, but the species remains the same, not one shred of proof that anything becomes anything but itself. The backing of evolution?
h2omanz 2 years ago
A theory will never become a law, and a law never was a theory. A scientific fact is an observable natural occurrence; a scientific theory is an attempt to explain how this natural occurrence works; and, a scientific law is a mathematical description of this natural occurrence.
h2omanz 2 years ago
@h2omanz
Technically, evolution has been proven: the HIV virus reproduces at such a fast rate that it can evolve and adapt through natural selection to newly introduced antibodies and medicines designed to combat the virus. If things didn't evolve, HIV wouldn't pose a problem at all because we'd have found some treatment that kills it completely, but it's because the virus evolves through natural selection and adapts, that every new treatment (there's about 20) has been rendered ineffective.
MooWentCow 1 year ago
@MooWentCow
Technically Micro evo is the only proven side(adaptation/variances), the rest is what science calls fact w/o proof, Its accurate to say that science has yet to provide consistent answers to how evolution operates at the molecular, genetic, or even ecological levels in a consistent and supportable way. The 'history' of evolution is where the REAL EVIDENCE lay, not modern science attempting to make a 150 yr old unscientific belief work.
h2omanz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@h2omanz
"If so then no lab nor has anything been proven within nature to evolve"
There is more evidence for the theory of evolution than the theory of gravity, whoever told you that, doesnt know what they are talking about, or are lieing.
Evolution is a scientific theory, that means it only exsists because it has yet to be disproven, if you hear something is a theory, then say it hasnt been proven, it is like saying the sky is blue, but it hasnt been proven.
AwsomeAthiest 1 year ago
@B
2.
There are so many gaps,flaws,disposed theories, hoaxes, the concealed, the unexplained, that makes evolution a joke. If you want proof of God let me know and I will PM to you.
h2omanz 2 years ago
The words "proof" and "god" should never be used in the same sentence. The proof of god is one single book written by men that is no more relevant than any other religions holy book.
Berramus 2 years ago
The words "proof","fact" and "evolution" should never be used in the same sentence.
Since you obviously don't know the proof and evidence the bible provides, and why it is unlike any other religious book is called biblical ignorance.
h2omanz 2 years ago
So by this you believe everyone one earth that isnt christian is going to hell? Islam, Hindu, Buddhist, Traditional Chinese, and even those who are non aware of even a sense that there may be a god and totally innocent? People who live their lives justly and properly will go to hell because all they know is allah?
Berramus 2 years ago
Not for me to judge. God I'm sure God will look at the heart if 'the word' was never presented,(bush man, rice farmers etc..). But those that have and refuse, I believe will be condemned to Hell.
h2omanz 2 years ago
@h2omanz What will you do in the event if Allah confronts you?
Berramus 2 years ago
Well the over whelming evidence for the Bible is proof for me, as the Koran does not. But if Allah is real then i would hope for mercy just as I would hope for muslims if my God is real.
h2omanz 2 years ago
Your ignorance is unbounded.
Antisyzygy 2 years ago
thanks Shrek!
h2omanz 2 years ago
Very Christian of you.
Antisyzygy 2 years ago
Your welcome, anytime.
h2omanz 2 years ago
Like what?
ColinRayko 2 years ago
......Christianity and the proofs of God?
h2omanz 2 years ago
Yeah what exactly make the bible better than the quran or the torah espcially considerign the bible bites from the toruh and many major theme's in christianity (virgin births, ressurections, demi gods, sacrifices) are themes that have been apart of many other religions plenty of whom came before christianity?
Or how about this why is it that chirstianity only began once Jesus died. Why are you christian when jesus himself wasn't. Why didn't jesus try to start christianty while living?
ColinRayko 2 years ago
The Koran is nothing more than an ancient version of Mormonism. Copied from Christianity and revised through the Islamic prophet Muhammad, just as Joseph Smith Jr. did with Mormonism. Both had no witnesses(odd), they both state that they were visited by angels to give the real truths of God. When in fact the Bible warns against any angel giving new testament to Gods words differ than what is stated in the Bible.
Christianity copies no religion. If you are stating 'fact' from the Zeitgeist movie
h2omanz 2 years ago
What's zietgiest? It's common knowledge. Judasim taoism hinduism.
What about greek and roman mythology which if you remember those gods were taken just as seriously as the god of abrahamic religion is now.
They had a bunch of the stories chrisitanity try to claim.
ColinRayko 2 years ago
Where are those gods today?Gone. Again those gods were created before Christ, but after prophetic prophesy in the Old Test of the Bible.(copycats)
I will PM you the truth of the other gods and the similarities to Christianity.
h2omanz 2 years ago
Okay seriously There's just asmuch proof for any one of those gods as there is for the abrahamic one. As amatter of fact there's more because they have an origin there are tons of documented stories from first hand accounts. Sculptures.
But sure go ahead and PM me with this crucial info.
ColinRayko 2 years ago
I never said that the worshiping of those gods didn't exist, because they did. The others do not have the backing of the Bible, the genealogies all line up(all the way back to Abraham), the characters, events, history, locations, wars, civilizations, writings, prophesies, archaeology findings all have unbelievable proof of accuracy----
, the manuscripts are close to 24.000 in count,no other book or ancient book in the world and in history has come close.
h2omanz 2 years ago
Are you serious? Greek Mythology goes from generations of demigod children all the way to the parents of the gods the titans. Genealogies mean nothing.
Every religion has clearly stated and easily referenced locations.
Go to Greece or Egypt or India and I garuntee you'll find tours that will tak eyou to all of the religious hot spots.
What archeological finding with unbelievable archeological proof of accuracy has christianity found?
ColinRayko 2 years ago
My whole point of the genealogy, arch proof etc.. was to show the authenticity of the Bible, the words, the stories.
The way it has been preserved to this day, the 2000 fulfilled prophesies are testament of God.
h2omanz 2 years ago
I repeat. What archeological finding with unbelievable archeological proof of accuracy has christianity found?
And what exact prophecies have come true?
ColinRayko 2 years ago
PMed the prophesies
The arch. evidence is the cities of Jerusalem, Dan, Jericho, Shechem, Saul's fortress....much more.
All consistent with the Bible and its words.
h2omanz 2 years ago
The arch wasn't real. So that's a lie and none of those mean anything as far as proving Jesus is God. just that these places existed.
Wow great job.
ColinRayko 2 years ago
The arch(archeological findings)LOL
Their is proof of 'an' ark. There is one vid on my page that shows an ark with extraordinary similarities. Same size, rooms, resting location etc....Found in the fifties.
Again the cities don't prove God. Just that it's another piece of evidence that is accurate and consistant with the Bible.
Thanks for rewarding me a great job, much appreciated.
h2omanz 2 years ago
So do Greece and India prove hinudism and Zeus and Vishnu?
ColinRayko 2 years ago
2. and such you have bought into the lie of the movie. I can PM you the truth of the other religions(real sources such as links to university libraries) how the prophets in the Bible predict such things as a virgin birth, resurrection, etc 400-1500years prior to religions/gods such as Baal, Horus, Krisha, Mithra, Attis etc..
Jesus came to fulfill the law of mankind, Christianity began from the teachings of Christ and the way He came to save mankind.
h2omanz 2 years ago
You don't even know who wrote the gospels. No one does.
ColinRayko 2 years ago
We can trust what the Bible says about authorship, but we must be careful to be sure that it is saying what we believe it to be saying. Accurate info on authorship assists us with interpretation by giving the work a setting in history, a context which is the background of interpretation.Normally ancient authors used secretaries to write their works. Sometimes we know the names of these secretaries. For example, Tertius wrote Romans (Rom 16:22) and Silas (or Silvanus) probably wrote 1 Peter
h2omanz 2 years ago
there is plenty of evidence of a young earth and never heard about a local flood
i only know of the worldwide
if you want me to send the proof i have let me know id be happy to send
h2omanz 2 years ago
No there is not, sorry a young earth creation demand to close your eyes a not see overwhelming evindence. One question, If earth and the universe is young why there are stars whose light traveled to earth for milions of years? How come?
LukyHell 2 years ago
1. again i have info i can forward to you about the young earth
and actually causes you to open your eyes
as far as the stars, outta 100 trillion stars(maybe more) there should be stars born all the time,according to science and due to the fact that the stars are at differ ages(millions to develop and billions before death), yet never has a birth been seen only death
if God exists and made the heavens and the earth He has made everything at an advance stage, correct?
h2omanz 2 years ago
2/3. again if you wish i can explain 2 and 3 on a message page -not enough room here to type
-but as your last comments you are denying the gift of grace and making the choice
not to believe and to live w/o forgiveness
4.eagles have great eyesight so they can see prey from miles above
sea creatures have good underwater eyesight so the can see underwater
God gave us the sight needed as humans, no need to have beyond what we have
h2omanz 2 years ago
1b. For example, the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who was not a Christian, wrote in 93-94 A.D.
h2omanz 2 years ago
1
have plenty to explain about God, but was asking you why atheism is correct
can send in more detail to your page if you wish...
Some say that Jesus was a myth, that He was not a historical figure. These people maintain that no credible evidence exists that would substantiate His historicity. But nothing can be further from the truth. There is actually better historical evidence for the existence of Jesus and what Christians believe about Him than for just about any ancient historical figure.
h2omanz 2 years ago
1.what proof do you have that atheism is correct?
2. you would be on your knees cryin, screaming for mercy
3. i can explain hell if you want, dont have room here, hit me at page and i can forward to you
4. God limits us so we are aware that we ourselves are no god eg. bleed,cry, poop stinks, limited vision
water question: only 3% of the earths water is fresh, 2% are glaciers , 1% mainly run off of rain, snow know as the hydrologic cycle
"in Gods image" isnt physical, not what verse means
h2omanz 2 years ago
1. What proof do you have that your god is real and that some other god is no real?
2. So your god is a vile god if I would scream and beg for mercy if I would meet him, very nice.
3. If your dead you can not be tortured, only if the loving god who sends you to hell make you feel pain.
4.What ever.
Water : Some YEC idiots now support the local flood theory not the world wide, the point is, there was never a world wide flood.
LukyHell 2 years ago 3
@h2omanz "what proof do you have that atheism is correct?" - atheism isn't a positive position, its a rejection of theism. you cant have proof of atheism any more than you can have proof that santa claus doesn't exist. your question is illogical.
errskin 11 months ago
@errskin
We had a convo about 5mos ago via pm if you don't remember. In regards to your remark if you span back over a year ago in the comments, you'd see my question of 'what proof that atheism is correct' is a response to me being asked 'what proof that the Judeo God is the correct god'. Atheism relies on materialistic God rejecting faith, if you can't prove that atheism is the right choice by rejecting God, not really a solid choice, faith based just like any religion. Santa Syndrome.
h2omanz 11 months ago
@h2omanz "Atheism relies on materialistic God rejecting faith," - no, atheism is the rejection of theism. it doesn't rely on anything. if you are asking of its the right choice to reject theistic claims then yes it is, as none of them have any evidence. that is, there is no evidence of god.
errskin 11 months ago
@errskin
If you reject God then one 'must rely' on 'faith' that God doesn't exist, and the fact that our existences is due to materialism/natural causes, that or aliens.lol. If atheism doesn't rely on anything as you stated than logically, it goes against reason and common sense. You must 'rely' that all the evidence is wrong nor doesn't exists.
There is plenty of evidence that points to God, we already had this discussion, but is pointless when a bias has already predetermined is validity.
h2omanz 11 months ago
@h2omanz evidence? -looks around- i see no evidence -looks in bible- i only see ink and paper -looks at a human- hmm i see no simularitys -looks at apes- oh there it is
XeldarksChannel 9 months ago
@XeldarksChannel
Well thought out...?
You wont see what you don't want to, no similarity between ink/paper and man...perceptive
Ranting with a few(at most)yrs of study on the subject is suppose to be laudable? Study the subject for another 20yrs and hit me up, only then will someone ruminatively consider your opinion.
I dont' want to be on this page, so if you 'must' reply in PM
h2omanz 9 months ago
@h2omanz 1. Because you lack evidence for the claim that a god exists. 2. A loving god would make me cry for mercy? 3. An infinite penalty for a finite crime? 4. Limited vision is not a good case for proving there's a god. That's hiring a blind man to prove the color red exists.
evelsteev 8 months ago
@evelsteev
1.God encourages you to test His word to prove He is who He says He is, nothing lacking. 2. Was a response to LukyHell that on judgment day his boastful pride he relies on today will be shattered. 3. All of mankind is heading for hell, Christ is the only one that can save you from it, you send yourself. A loving God offers a way to avoid eternal punishment 4. Wasn't a proof nor was it used as a case, you took it out of context. Last comment, stawman ammo, with no bearing.
h2omanz 8 months ago
@h2omanz 1.You have no evidence for god's existence.2.God is threatened by pride? I thought he was "all powerful." 3. God could have not make hell in the first place, so NO one would have to go.4.There's no proof, either way, no matter HOW you look at it.
evelsteev 8 months ago
@evelsteev
I can answer all of those 4, but only one at a time. First one; If I never heard or felt love before, don't believe it exists, believe it is made up, how do you tell me it is real? will you tell me that it is as real as the nose on my face? That it can be experienced and therefore known. So tell me how do you prove to me love exists and is real? For argument sake, I don't believe it exists there is no proof, either way, no matter HOW you look at it.
h2omanz 8 months ago
@h2omanz Love can be observed, otherwise, what are you talking about? However, that doesn't prove god exists. Straw man aside, you have no evidence for God's existence, plain and simple. Provide testable, objective evidence for god's existence.
evelsteev 8 months ago
@evelsteev
Not really a strawman as I will prove my point, after you answer or attempt. So again people believing in God and worshiping Him can be observed, doesnt mean its real either, as love being observed is not proved to be genuine. So again love doesnt exist, prove to me its real
h2omanz 8 months ago
@h2omanz Love can be observed through brains scans, when testing for them. Love can actually be "mapped" so to speak. God cannot. Bad argument.It is a straw man, because you haven't provided evidence for god's existence. The same request can be made:prove to me god is real.
evelsteev 8 months ago
@evelsteev
Quit jumping the gun, you want evidence I will give it, you are too impatient .I already stated I would explain why it relates. Not setting up a strawman.From what I understand pleasure and pain is what is measured in the scans, not love. So again I dont believe in it and you havent proven it to me yet. I have to run, take your time, if you want and can, give me some good hard evidence. I can get back to you later
h2omanz 8 months ago
@h2omanz You understood wrong. The subjects that were selected were already committed, plenty of time to produce the chemicals ( dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin) to indicate activity. There's also the pair-bonding chemical, oxytocin, which inhibits long-lasting relationships. Again, none of this is related to the existence of god. My "patience" is irrelevant. I'm asking for evidence, and you have still provided none.
evelsteev 8 months ago
@evelsteev
1.Sorry but 'my' patience in explaining is relevant as I am making a point of how God is known. And am willing to show you how, if its too slow than move on, maybe you don't really want to know. Also you probably will deny all nor take the steps needed to find the truth, as your mind/heart has already decided. It will require laying down your pride as well, this is where most fail.
h2omanz 8 months ago
2.If you do want to cont..All these studies are not evidence, they are small, preliminary studies and experiments, and the studies always state: this new study 'suggests'. Oxytocin is released in response to stress or stimuli, and social bonding/attachment/communication is not proof of love. Dopamine is associated with pleasures via sex, music, food/hunger/cravings. Nothing conclusive here that love is real. So what you presented is not proof.
h2omanz 8 months ago
@h2omanz That's not evidence. That's just more distraction from the main objective for showing evidence for god's existence. You never mentioned "impatience" until I asked, directly, for evidence. Still nothing.
evelsteev 8 months ago
@evelsteev
Waiting for my evidence that love is real, remember I stated that I was making a point. Let me know when you can, as I have nothing from you and so far you have given zero evidence.
h2omanz 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@h2omanz I already GAVE you the evidence. If you need it AGAIN, just look up Dr Donatella Marazziti, psychiatrist at the University of Pisa. However, even there was no evidence, this has absolutely nothing to do with evidence for the existence of god. Another straw man, yet again.
evelsteev 8 months ago
@evelsteev
All you had to do was prove to me that love was real or admit that it couldn't be proven. Point woulda been made thereafter.
h2omanz 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@h2omanz That has nothing to do with god. I'm asking for evidence for his existence. You have still provided none.
evelsteev 8 months ago
Love can be observed, otherwise, what would you be talking about? But straw man, aside, this doesn't prove god's existence. Plain and simple: you don't have evidence for a claim about god's existence, and neither does anyone else.
evelsteev 8 months ago
Very very well argued. Also, I love your accent!
NoStringsAttachedPrd 2 years ago
it seems your saying I do not understand God so He does not exist, so please explain nuclear fact(not theory that would be a guess) My infant does not understand me that would mean I don't exist.I do believe in science but all knowing God not giving proper eyes to animals makes no sense. And man would die out in evo. so thare must be more involved. Christianity never harmed any one evil people claiming to be something they are not has.
daddyg321 2 years ago
First point about the infant, you directly interact with your child and if don't care about it, feed it then it will not survive and it can see you!
About the eyes : If god made humans in his image then why have some animals better eyes than humans? It is a god, right?
It is not about understanding, it's about a fictional character created by the minds of humans in ancient times.
LukyHell 2 years ago
I care for my child his mother was adopted at birth does her mother not exist. About the eyes we were made in the image of a spritual being. A major arguement I here is I don't understand so God is wrong or he isn't real, which would mean only what we understand is, that is the most child like thinking I've heard.
daddyg321 2 years ago
You entered the realm of fantasy and the only thing you have is blind faith.
I don't say I don't understand god, I say there is none, you don't need him for any part of your life and the only difference is in your head and and your believe.
LukyHell 2 years ago
1-I have more than blind faith. 2-Major flood would dilute salt years of rain would wash it into the sea(thts how it get salty in the first place)3-Humans imply evo.theory is wrong(a hairless ape that can hardly hear, smell, see, run, jump, climb, dig, or fight seems like alion snack)4-I have seen miracles(done by a former ranger, all at no cost,to show God can save anyone)5- God is not man so not held to human limits. Running out of room please deal with you anger.
daddyg321 2 years ago
2-If the flood causes the fresh water to be salty then rain wouldnt move the salt any where. Thats why no matter how much it rains in salt lake city, the lake is still salty. 3-humans arent hairless apes, they are humans and cousins to apes. A dog seems like a punk compared to its cousin the wolf too, but dogs are doing just fine.5-God is held to human limits in one sense, he cannot control himself emotionally, and we see this over and over again throughout the bible.
kamguia10 2 years ago
2-super genius ever heard the thoery of erosion, rain erodes or washes minerals like salt into rivers and then into larger bodies like oceans (study science)5-I've always wonered how liberal know what God thinks and feel, no one else can.
daddyg321 2 years ago
Man would not die out in evolution, actually evolution perfectly explains our prosperity. We were givin the ability to adapt on the fly (use tools, Make coats). Thus, we are at an advantage towards every other animal in the forest. Go to africa and watch a tribe hunt with nothing but spears and slings. They can bring down and animal using the most important tool that evolution gave us. Our brains!!!
kamguia10 2 years ago
And before weapons (thanks for showing their need) humans would have been the easiest prey.
daddyg321 2 years ago
Have problems dealind with public input? Natural lakes, ponds and swamps do not permently hold water they have an inlet and outlet. Please study grade school science.
daddyg321 2 years ago
You are EXTREMELY spiritually hungry,CLEARLY your evolutionist views have not quenched your hunger,and NOTHING else ever will.If you want to know why hell exists,read the book of Revelations,the first line of which is "The revelation of Jesus Christ" he summed it up in Mathew 22;29 Ye Err not knowing the scriptures or the power of God!!You will NEVER have" rest" in anything else but your manufacturer and his word!NEVER
onlyjoetee 2 years ago
I like your answer to question 2. God, if he were to exist, should be helping the poor people in Africa and other poor places in the world.
What is your opinion on the Bahai faith?
HaleyMary 2 years ago
Miracles have happed lives have been saved God has helped EVERYONE who has asked and still does. You can be forgiven for any sins and Hell was created for sinners and those who try to put themselves in Gods place like Satan for example. He does love all of us we are his children. God works in mysterious ways he does protect millions he does help millions and if he stood in front of you, you would fall to your knee's and ask forgivness for all you've said and done. One day he will show himself.
gjj101 2 years ago
I will bow to no such God.
takkunolam 2 years ago
Then you will go bow to your gold statue and call that a god. theres a good reason why you havent seen any miracles. you might ask God to prove himself to you but He doesnt hav to. the bible says that if you fall off a cliff God will lift you up, but if you test Him and jump, well, looks like your on your own.
Lizzard0601 2 years ago
hey lizzard bow to your book that was written hundreds of years after the guy who told the story.
EminemFan117 2 years ago
I dont bow to the bible. And you cannot break me down. call me crazy or watevr u want to. but even if God WASNT real you have to admit(altho u wudnt know) that WHOEVER rote the bible had to be pretty damn smart.
Lizzard0601 2 years ago
people shouldnt have to ask a perfect god to help them out of the suffering that he designed to come true realization? theres something bigger than the cult of theism.
legionabbadon 2 years ago
GOD WAS IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE, he loves everyone on this planet.
gjj101 2 years ago
wow great
legionabbadon 2 years ago
Nice video Luky. Good stuff, as always.
Swede1066 2 years ago