Added: 4 years ago
From: eenkmouse2311
Views: 134,174
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,997)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Evidence/impacts of climate change series...

    .

    Tallying disasters and gauging a greenhouse impact

    . It's not easy to tally up disasters in 2011, but according to the global insurance industry, the $380 billion in losses was the most expensive year on record.

    .

    New York Times

    January 22, 2012

  • It's so funny that the largest CO2 quote sellers nowadays are the oil companies : D

    How ironic... I don't give a f*ck (with all respect) for global warming.

  • The ECO-TERRORISTS want to CONTROLTHE WORLD!

    Be scared, be very scared.

  • @frolly1000 yeah right

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @BeondaMassa You see how your Night persona likes to project what she does onto others? Couldn't you close off some of your multiple personalities and just use a few please Clara?

  • Hey YOUTUBE, would you MODERATE this WEBSITE to make it a SAFE PLACE for all your users to post on

    ?????

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..

    (Please read article before the denier oil TROLL with all the sock puppet accounts is allowed to CENSOR it by Youtube)..

    .

    Another year goes by and we're no closer to solving climate change

    .

    Events of 2011 show that no matter how solid the science, some people will never accept that humans are causing global warming.

    .

    Atlantic Monthly

    Opinion, 4 January 2012

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..

    (please read article before the denier oil TROLL with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Clueless about curbing pollution

    .

    Various surveys have put Pune among the most polluted cities in the last few years, but the Pune Municipal Corporation and its elected members have not drafted a comprehensive policy to assess the pollution and its impact on citizens.

    .

    New Delhi Times of India, India

    3 January 2012

  • Hey YOUTUBE, do you mind moderating this website and making it a SAFE PLACE for YOUR USERS to POST on?

  • OK, here's another of my comments for you to CENSOR: Right???

    .

    Ecuador vows to push Yasuni jungle protection plan

    .

    Ecuador has vowed to press ahead with a plan to shield the Yasuni reserve in the Amazon jungle from oil companies, saying that by not extracting the heavy oil under Yasuni, some 400 million tonnes of carbon dioxide will not be released into the atmosphere, and a jungle area with more tree species than North America will be better protected.

    .

    Reuters

    31 December 2011

  • Comment removed

  • @Nightversionn Nobody gets censored on THIS channel, Lefty, so quit copping a victim stance.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @eenkmouse2311 Go to this video and LOOK AT THE COMMENT SECTION

    watch?v=Zsnu22nl16w&feature=re­lated

    OK WITH YOU

    ???

  • @eenkmouse2311 Perhaps you should ban Nightversionn aka Clara Massa, the notorious Randomlaughingman from Encyclopedia Dramatica infamy. She doesn't post, she spams articles everywhere, everyday, because well, the article explains it better than I could.

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 SUURE....go ahead, BAN ME, CENSOR ME,

    CYBER-BULLY ME

    HARASS ME

    STALK ME

    Whatever it is YOU PEOPLE DO

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 Don't make FALSE ACCUSATIONS, that is another person, a person you HARASS as well.

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 Hey and guess what nimrod? I plan on leaving a SHITLOAD MORE ALL OVER YOUTUBE IF YOU CONTINUE TO FOLLOW ME AROUND REMOVING MY COMMENTS

    ??????

    GET IT?????

  • @Nightversionn Why are you so angry and argumentative? Were you prescribed medication and neglected to take it?

  • @Nightversionn You do realize the guy you just cursed out, threatened, and went ballistic on is the owner of this video Clara.

  • Comment removed

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 Oh REALLY He's not another one of your DENIER SOCK PUPPET ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE BEEN HARASSING ME FOR OVER THREE YEARS ON THIS WEBSITE???

  • @Nightversionn That's similar to your Randomlaughingman personna, where you claim to be stalked for over 10 years, and through multiple past lives stretching through hundreds of years.

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 OH REALLY

    CAN YOU TELL ME WHY YOUTUBE LETS YOU CENSOR MY COMMENTS?

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 Lol, what, do you think you're going to cyber-bully people and they will like it???

    UHHHHHHHH....NO

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 You have been cyber-BULLYING me for A LONG TIME, it was only after you started following me around REMOVING all my comments I started posting articles so you COULDN'T DO IT AS EASILY

    YOUR FAULT

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @eenkmouse2311 You may not like censorship on your channel, but you can't stop someone from coming here with sock puppets, thumbing people's comments down so no one can read them.

    This is what this person does, he singles me out for cyber-bullying, follows me around, and systematically removes ALL my comments.

    This is a free country and a free society and everyone deserves a chance to speak, even people you don't agree with

    Wouldn't you agree with that? You don't agree with me?

  • And I'm not the only one he singled out for cyber-bullying, he does it to other people in different ways, but it's all cyber-bullying, to make it so you won't talk. Only some of us don't like to be told what to do by a f***ing cyber-bully, duh?

  • He doesn't like me or anyone else talking freely about climate change.

    THANK YOU for showing everyone what the losing "side" behaves like.

    eom

  • @eenkmouse2311 MannySteinerBleeky is another of Nightversionn's Randomlaughingman accounts. A racist nazi loving lunatic. Google "Randomlaughingman" or find her on her Encyclopedia Dramatica listing, nutty stuff.

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 LIE, all you do is LIE and harass people. Get lost TROLL

  • @ChristopherMonckton5 Quit CENSORING my comments, or I will leave a f****LOAD more for you

  • Comment removed

  • One problem with the consiracy theory

    Un only exists at the whim of the US president pretty much as the "World Bank" does

    Money doesn't really exist and is only a substitute bartering medium for time people work mostly,though investments can increase bartering power without direct work("profit")

  • @TheRealArchAngel if you really think the US president has any power over UN or the World bank, you are truly deluted.

  • @AmericaSpeaksOut1 ... O,o .... was there a solution in your answer? that was the main point of my comment. many points of view, no solution.

  • @MzLoriAnnAWA CO2 is a non-issue. It is a mere trace gas at 0.038% and the more of it we can liberate from sequestration, the more food there is for life on this planet, the more green the planet becomes and the more food we'll have to eat. So, there is no "CO2 Problem" that needs solving.

    HOWEVER, we do need to solve the problem of dependence on Petroleum as our main fuel.

    GW Bush provided that solution: Geothermal electricity and Hydrogen as the mainstream fuel.

  • climate change is indeed natural, so gee, let's all make some incinerators for our nasty garbage, burn lots of coal & oil, we should also go back to dumping everything into the rivers. ....pfffft. don't u all realize that no matter if climate change is 'real' or not, the richest people will have what they want. so, what's the solution? where's THAT video? i haven't found it on youtube, that's for sure. Bush didn't sign the kyoto protocol, so how does that play into the enviro-hoax for the rich?

  • @MzLoriAnnAWA Congress rejected the Kyoto protocol because it was an obvious attempt to kill US industry and transfer it to China and India, which would not be restricted by it.

    Rejection of Kyoto did not save us. The Democrats and global Communists have found other ways to achieve the same goal, mainly through "environmental regulation" by our own government, and by directly killing off US energy producers.

    Obama drove US drillers from the Gulf then invited Brazil to come take our oil. Wow.

  • @MzLoriAnnAWA Just think - by killing off US production and letting China build new factories and coal-fired power plants to make up for it, we are INCREASING the creation of environmentally toxic chemicals. China has nowhere near the pollution controls we do.

    Would you rather a clean American company produce your computers or a nasty, polluting Chinese company do it?

    The Democrats are making sure it is the nasty, polluting Chinese who win, not us.

  • Climate Change is natural.

    Taxing us for it so Al Gore can buy lavish energy-wasting mansions... that's man-made.

  • Another piece of propaganda from out oil funded denialists

  • Thanks to a slight reduction in solar forcing, that "man-made" global warming stopped in 2005. What a relief!

    Wait... no... it wasn't a good thing...

    UK Cold, Snow Blamed as Economy Slips

    accuweather*com/blogs/news/sto­ry/44903/uk-cold-snow-fingered­-as-econo-1*asp?partner=accuwe­ather

    Mexico loses 80-100% of crops to freeze, US prices to skyrocket

    digitaljournal*com/article/303­583

    500 rare African penguins killed by big freeze in South Africa

    digitaljournal*com/article/293­468

  • Pollution control and recycling engineering technologies are already in existence since the 40s, 50s,60s,70s, and early 80s that can literally solve any pollution problem but they deliberately allowed the problem to remain uncheck so as to create a crises w/c they will use as a reason and excuse to conquer the world economically and politically, it is obvious, just like at the TOTAL FAILURE OF SPAIN'S GREEN ECONOMY and at their desperation to push carbon cap and trade global policy scams!

  • ...lets get at least one thing straight, bio fuels were going to be the next big thing because Europe and the world had massive annual stockpiles of such seeds with no market to sell them to because they were giving farmers subsidies. The world changed with the rise of the BRICS and now the market is buying all food. There is no large scale bio fuel market, it was a failed idea. There is only ethanol from sugarcane and that market will end.

  • The average person knows that Global Warming has everything to do with fear generated carbon credit implementation to make the rich richer and the middle class and poor, poorer. They also notice that this carbon credit system will not be saddled on the polluters in Asia and South America. Its a big fraud and with the way the economy is collapsing, I don't think they'd be stupid enough to try it.

  • I have had arguments with scientists. I am NOT trying to paint them as rosy.

    But the whole CLIMATE thing just doesn't paint the right picture of what "observational scientists" are like. Don't confuse this with "theoretical science" which is TOTALLY different.

    But what we are seeing is Wall Street and the BIGGEST MONEY with all the INFLUENCE it can buy, declaring WAR on a branch of science.

    They know that the longer they can DELAY the PERCEPTION, the more $ in it for them.

    The truth hurts.

  • If you ever want to get the idea of the mind of a scientist and how it works, here is a suggestion.

    Go to the library and find Nevil Shute's "No Highway" and there is a nicely written novel you will get the idea, but he really nails it.

    They are NOT savvy people. They often need NON-scientists around them.

    You will rarely see them on TV. They figure it is NOT their job. Indeed if one does appear to try get notice, other scientists who work with them will often resent this. They can be petty.

  • I know I am hitting a rock with you guys.

    But WHY is The Wall Street Journal leading the charge. Doesn't that sound SUSPICIOUS to you?

    Yes, of course it contains the grain of truth that scientists are always starved of funding and often have to BEG to continue the project they are one or need to start.

    Great purphies starts like that, it makes them sound plausible.

    But they are not when the OPPOSITE is true. WHY are scientists saying NOT to the money?

    PLEASE, think about it, but you won't?

  • Hi Guys

    I know I am bashing my head against a rock.

    The purphy that has been successfully started by Singer in The Wall Street (a MONEY magazine) has been EXTRAORDINARILY SUCCESSFUL.

    It is about DELAY.

    It has TWO components.

    1. The science is not settled.

    2. MORE RESEARCH is required.

    It's the 2nd part that gives the game away. The BIG MONEY is not from the government to scientists - it's WALL STREET.

    Why would scientists say NO to the money if MORE RESEARCH is required?

    DELAY, DELAY.

  • "No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."

    Christine Stewart, former Minister of the Environment of Canada quote from the Calgary Herald, 1999

  • Take this horseshit down. Who cares? There honestly IS NOT ENOUGH warming talk on TV and WAY too many special interests denying the facts.

  • @donsjuand - Facts? What facts?

    There is honestly TOO MUCH warming talk on TV, and too many special interests shoveling it on us.

    Why do you want to "take this" down? Why do you fear debate?

    Is it because the science isn't "settled"? Is it because it approaches heresy to you?

  • — RED ALERT!

    ------------------------------­¬--------------- ABC asks:

    “Are you a victim of the F_D R ______‘s

    economic policies?“

    Watch ABC‘s TV special, The Money Masters.

    Go to this youtube VID … drag its progress bar to 2:10 : 80s Commercials Dec 1982 (Part 14)

    Get it … same old exposé … exposé … exposé … LOL! I‘m part of the NWO; are you … unwittingly, by EXTENSION?

    

  • According to the UN, here are a list of things that do not fit into sustainable development plans.

    “Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paves and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.” -UN’s Biodiversity Assessment Report.

  • "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion (Global warming) that they shall believe a lie" II Thessalonians 2:11

  • what book is this quoting?

    thanks

  • The invisible enemy?

    He is called SATAN.

    The science has been settled. Those who deny it has been brainwashed by the anti-communists Cold War Warriors who also fought the Tobacco Wars. Today nearly 1/4 of the US population believe tobacco is not harmful and 40% that Saddam bombed Twin Towers.

    The same POWERS are at work - WAKE UP!!

    Melons? "They are Green on the outside and RED on the inside."

    If u are an environmentalist YOU ARE A SOCIALIST.

    Hah, but THIS is what they are saying. WAKE UP!

  • @mayuhavepeace - The science is never settled. That's not what science does. It is always evolving in understanding. The science was settled with the sun going around the earth too, and the evidence for that was far more solid than that for global warming. Anybody looking at a sunrise could tell you that the sun was moving around the earth. It would look exactly the same way. Science changes.

    Science tolerates dissent, as does a free society. But climate change does not tolerate dissent.

  • @mpc91

    Please don't lecture me. I work with scientists and know what "settled science" means.

    It is PEER-REVIEWED CONCLUSION BY AN ACCEPTED BODY OF SCIENTISTS.

    The issue settled is in these words. THERE IS A *DISCERNIBLE* HUMAN INFLUENCE ON THE GLOBAL CLIMATE.

    When EVERY National Academy of Science in the World (32) has accepted that as a proper scientific view, then in that CONTEXT the science is as settled as that of tobacco's link with cancer.

  • @mayuhavepeace - You work with scientist who are funded by who? And their peer reviewers are funded by who?

    The issue is most certainly not settled. Just because people with a political motivation to say it is, say it is. Explain then those people who say it isn't.

    Governments want there to be climate change, so of course their "academies" would concur. Those who disagree are fired or marginalized. Climate change then requires a solution, new bureaucracies and more government.

  • @mpc91

    Funded? You think that THIS is what it's about? You really believe that stuff?

    I don't know ANY rich scientists. One is a close personal friend and is now retired and lives VERY modestly.

    He is also far more reasonable than anything I am hearing from you.

    Scientists do NOT get a lot of money. You are talking an obscenity and character assassinating people you have not even met.

    Anti-scientists are FAR BETTER FUNDED. They should also pay YOU money or are you just an unthinking parrot?

  • @mayuhavepeace - Reasonable, I cannot disagree with you and be reasonable. That's funny. You're the one who's acting like a parrot. You're the one who seems to believe whatever he's told without question.

    But facts are facts, Exxon-Mobil spent $23 million funding skeptics. The US government alone has spent over $79 BILLION (with a B) directly on global warming research. That's more than 3000 to 1. That doesn't seem far better funded to me.

  • @mayuhavepeace When scientists receive government funding, they are required to tell the public what the government wants the public to hear, and nothing else. So their research has to be geared to validate the claims of the powers that be. To legitimatize propaganda, in other words. Otherwise, they lose the funding.

    That is the condition for receiving government money.

  • @DaveGibbagglers

    >scientists receive government funding

    The line was started by S. Fred Singer in The Wall Street and many have swallowed it.

    Fine.

    But does that really make sense, Think about, wouldn't the OPPOSITE suit scientists if what Singer and now you are saying.

    Over and over Singer et al is saying "the science is NOT setlled" and (you may not hear this) "MORE RESEARCH IS NEEDED."

    Wouldn't the scientists say GOOD - give us MORE MONEY then.

    Hence not about money, it is about DELAY.

  • @DaveGibbagglers

    >That is the condition for receiving government money.

    So WHY are the scientists then SAYING NO TO THE MONEY?

    How this argument has gotten of the ground just amazes me. I am sure you are a nice guy and I don't want to have any beef with you.

    I work with scientists, they are very intelligent but often not smart and they are not very good media managers. Mostly they shun the media. They are a funny lot. But this argument is all wrong. But it sure has got traction.

    I give up.

  • @mayuhavepeace No to government money? Who pays their salaries? Carbon taxes.

  • @DaveGibbagglers

    And those who say global warming is a myth are also saying that it will bring in a One World Government. Just watched Jesse Ventura last night.

    So it's just amother Conspiracy Myth.

    I suspect we may well completely mess this one up and then PRAY that God will fix mankind's predicament because humans have once again shown they don't know how to govern themselves.

    In the meantime we have climate scientists to demonise - the new bogeymen.

    Hitler would be proud of this one.

  • @DaveGibbagglers

    I know I am not going to change your mind.

    But at least ask yourself some tough questions. Why would climate scientists be involved in a Conspiracy Myth because of wages, one that Lord Moncton , James Hunt etc, says is about bringing in a One World Goverment?

    Sorry, it makes ZERO sense to me. Blame scientists? All because of WAGES?

    One thing for sure, the anti-global warming crowd ARE ALL EX-COLD WAR WARRIORS.

    To them ENVIRONMENTALISM IS THE NEW COMMUNISM.

    A proxy ENEMY.

  • @mayuhavepeace Do you think they will ever "cure" cancer and put an end to a whole industry and put an end to the gravy train? Conspiracy? No common sense. Along the same lines is global warming funding.  The money is in finding global warming, and the carbon taxes on western countries. Put that in your pipe and smoke it friend.

  • Comment removed

  • @mayuhavepeace >> the anti-global warming crowd ARE ALL EX-COLD WAR WARRIORS.

    Um... no...

    Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever resigns from American Physical Society. Disgusted over the group’s promotion of man-made global warming fears

    Hal Lewis: My Resignation From The American Physical Society. Climate Science completely corrupted by money from joining the "warming" scam

    Oregon Governor Set to Fire State Climatologist For Dissenting Over Global Warming

  • @mayuhavepeace "To them ENVIRONMENTALISM IS THE NEW COMMUNISM"

    It's not like they're trying to keep it secret. Mikhail Gorbachev established and directs Green Cross International, which is orchestrating the global Green scam to pillage and redistribute nations' wealth.

    IPCC Official Ottmar Edenhofer: World climate summit, Cancun, is actually about distribution of the world's resources

    thegwpf*org/ipcc-news/1877-ipc­c-official-climate-policy-is-r­edistributing-the-worlds-wealt­h.html

  • @VerumJusticia

    This is just another crazy Conspiracy Theory and it involves every scientist in the word?

    All I can say, the people selling that line must be GENIUSES and the rest DUNCES.

    Sorry, just do not buy it.

    Besides, whatever, it isn't a bad thing to change from an oil based economy as we will run out of the stuff. Hence there ARE businesses who look forward to the opportunities for innovation in renewables. I would like some of that action too. Nothing wrong with that.

  • @VerumJusticia

    Actually, the Soviets were TERRIBLE polluters. In fact, what remains of it still is.

    Let me get this straight. If I express concerns about the environment, then I am a SOCIALIST ???

    You know what I call that?

    YouTube LOGIC.

    HAH-HAH LOL

    That is funny, you gotta admit that!

  • @mpc91

    "But climate change does not tolerate dissent."

    That is complete NONSENSE, worse, it is HOGWASH.

    There is PLENTY of dissent. LOL

    Where do you get this stuff? It comes from S. Fred Singer in The Wall Street Journal and like others he NEVER submits his stuff for peer review, but in a MONEY MAGAZINE.

    The anti-climate deniers NEVER SUBMITS THEIR STUFF TO PEER REVIEW.

    The IPCC Report is the most heavily peer reviewed report the World HAS EVER SEEN !

    Reading the Media you wouldn't know.

  • @mpc91

    S. Fred Singer, Bill Nierenberg, Robert Jastrow, Sigfried Seitz.etc.

    They write a LOT of stuff.

    They are anti-communists promoting Free Market Fundamentalism religion and refers to anybody they perceive (sometimes wrongly) as Environmentalists - they call them MELONS.

    Know why they call them MELONS, because MELONS are Green on the outside and **RED** inside.

    These former anti-communists who now view Environmentalism as back door Socialism.

    They also supported the Tobacco industry.

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    Al Gore: Climate science "reality" versus Republicans

    .

    For Al Gore, the choice is obvious: Either accept scientific reality about climate change or believe what the fossil fuel industry is paying some Republican candidates to say.

    .

    Reuters

    15 September 2011

  • @Nightversionn slowly but surely your climate change is coming out as nothing but BS. the name had to be changed to climate change because the earth was no longer warming. it's all about the money and either you're making money off of climate change or you're just that damn stupid. personally I think you're just that damn stupid

  • @8thEastTexasBlues ......the....the earth is warming...that is an undeniable fact that is measurable and has been measured by scientists. Please show me a peer-reviewed source/scientific source that says the Earth is now cooling and I will show you a pile of S*%@

  • @buchedda measured by scientists and replaced with false facts. these scientists are getting millions to regurgitate what the people giving them money want them to say. I agree the earth is warming. when I woke up this morning it was 70 degrees and now it's 77 degrees

  • @8thEastTexasBlues If you say that, do you believe other facts then put forth by scientists, and if so, why do you believe those facts and not these?Those scientists are not getting millions,please show me that they are.If anything they are underpaid most of the time.

    I'm glad you keep track of the temperature change, too bad you can't keep track of facts. You also have yet to show me a scientific source where it says the Earth is cooling....go on, I'm waiting.

  • @buchedda the FACT that global warming was changed to climate change is one indication. history tells me that the earth has gone through periods of warming and cooling. you can explain to me your "facts" all day long but it doesn't make them "facts" feed BS into a computer you get BS out. when the earth goes back ing to warming up you can change it back to global warming if you want or you can keep calling it climate change. your choice LOL

  • @8thEastTexasBlues .......the 2 terms are interchangeable, climate change is just the formal way of saying it and encompasses a broader aspect aside from warming. History would tell you right, and records from the last decade would also tell you that the Earth is warming. Obviously you do not have the mental capacity to continue in such discussion of this topic due to the clear lack of knowledge and coherence you have to understand a simple discription of what is happening.

  • @buchedda obviously you don't have the capacity to comprehend anything that happened more than 10 years ago. the earth started more than 10 years ago

  • @8thEastTexasBlues Thanks for making my point, your comprehension level is very low. That's kind of understood I would know that. Fact still stands the Earth is warming

  • @buchedda yawn. the global warming,I mean climate change scam is really falling apart on you alarmists. you've tried so hard to make people believe this hoax but the truth is coming to light and people are starting to figure out that that it's one big scam. the only thing you've proven is that you think the earth warming up is a relatively new thing. that last ice age was is real booger. good thing the ice melted or it would be damn cold

  • @8thEastTexasBlues Why is it falling apart, because you fail to acknowledge scientific facts and data? Actually if you look at statistics the amount of people who believe climate change is occurring has increased greatly, and many governments around the world are changing their tactics in light of scientific discoveries, global occurrences, and facts.

    Tell me, if you think the present warming is false, then why are the glaciers melting at record pace (something visible)?

  • @8thEastTexasBlues ....continued...I guess the sad part is a lot of this is observable (the warming), and maybe your blind I don't know, but if you can't even observe what is happening, than you live a a dark little room with no outside input, or you are just plain ignorant, and I will be willing to guess the latter.

  • @buchedda continued..... I know the sad part about this is the gullibility of these global warm/climate change fanatics. hey, chicken little, the sky is falling. these fanatics don't not think for themselves and are incapable of thinking for themselves

  • @8thEastTexasBlues the only sad part here is your inability to actual realize what reality you are in. Since you are so adamant that the Earth is not warming, please give me a source, then i will give you 10x that.

  • @buchedda Clara's Goog2k account has been suspended, the lord's work. Hallelujah!

  • CERN: Strong correlation between cosmic influence and Earth Temperatures

    Mechanism finally demonstrated through experimentation, dispelling myths created by former "computer modeling".

    CERN’s CLOUD experiment provides unprecedented insight into cloud formation

    press. web. cern. ch/press/pressreleases/Release­s2011/PR15.11E.html

  • The Elite Billionaire:

    The European Union has mandated a 20 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2020, mandating that 10 percent of all vehicles be powered by biofuels. Government spends tax dollars, toward this end, on the investments of George Soros in this market.

    Consequence: Vast amounts of Amazon rain forest are destroyed for soybean and sugar cane cultivation to produce biofuels. Brazil announced that deforestation was on track to double in 2009

  • @AmericaSpeakOut1 That's sad. :( 

  • Can you source that paper please?

  • The man who made this video in the 1970's and who "sounded the patriotic alarm" was Bill Cooper. Bill Cooper had a radio show in the 90s but in 2001 he just decided to have a shoot out with the Arizona police because he didn't want to pay his income taxes for several years. Yes that's right this "patriot" killed and maimed two of Arizona's finest and got himself killed because he childishly didn't want to satisfy the IRS. What a hero - not. He was a subversive noncompliant slime bucket.

  • @narlycat the founding fathers of this country would have been considered noncompliant and subversive and you would be an english narly cat.

  • @Inoitspointless Al gore, the front man of the "global warming" crowd has three fricking houses for crying outloud! He flies around in a private jet. He doesn't ride a bike, he gets driven in a limo. How big is his "carbon footprint"??

  • @Inoitspointless what about the fact that the scientists don't even agree on the data. I just read an article that stated the arctic ice is actually on the rise. You are the one who needs to stop listening to the progaganda. I hate oil companies just as much as you, but you need to understand that they try to dupe us and rip us off in many different ways. it is isn't JUST the oil companies trying to rip us off.

  • @Inoitspointless they are the same people. The elite come in many forms but they have one thing common, they love money. No I don't believe in man made climate change so I guess we don't have a start. I think its bogus science and their money scheme called cap and trade is nothing more than another tax on the poor while the rich corporations will find their ways around the laws that we will all be forced to abide by and pay through the nose for.

  • @Inoitspointless We are not saying the environment should not be protected.  What we object to is the absolute money scheme global warming is and those who are pushing it stand to make billions!! They are lying in the data when they say humans are causing global warming. They have been caught lying and fixing the data. The earth goes through warming and cooling trends. The elite are trying to SCARE everyone so that they can make a profit. When are YOU going to see this is a money scheme??

  • They aren't really lying when they say a lot of people are going to die...

  • Seems like a fantasy conspiracy theory to distract people from the Severe foreseeable risks of the reality of man made climate change

  • @dmlt12 what a laugh ,.The earth changes it has for millions of year,s in the 1930,s they thought the earth would freeze , by 1960 , Oh but now its heating up, Do wake up sir ....its funny how nasa say Jupiter is heating as well.. all that carbon those alines use ... -.-

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    Is climate change the biggest national security challenge we are facing?

    .

    Over the past year, I've worked the vast security implications of global climate change into a few comments on The Best Defense, but they haven't taken hold. I cannot fathom the prevailing so-what attitude.

    .

    Foreign Policy

    Opinion, 1 August 2011

  • Check out Android Widget "Skeptical Science" for info on this

  • Here is some great news people

    Search "Our glaciers are growing, not melting More falsehoods from Al Gore"

  • All around the world governments are imposing a Carbon Tax. But Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion produces NO CO2 so therefore NO CARBON TAX. Also NO Nuclear Fission waste it is completely safe NO Fukushima here. It is very cheap to produce so if you care about the cost of your energy you will want this.

    See website "Star Scientific Limited"

    blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath"

    Youtube video "In the Footsteps of Fusion" + youtube channel

  • Ha. To bad global warming was known 120 years ago. Americans, you should start to take responsibility, not blame your insane political decisions on everybody else. Greetings from Norway.

  • Climate change news…Ecuador chooses rich biodiverse area over oil

    .

    A look at Ecuador's agreement to leave 846 million barrels of oil in the ground

    .

    Ecuador’s initiative to voluntarily leave nearly a billion barrels of oil under Yasuní National Park, arguably the most biodiverse spot on Earth, took a major step forward in early August when the government signed an accord with the for the long-awaited establishment of a trust fund.

    .

    Mongabay Opinion

    14 September 2010

  • Comment removed

  • 98 thumbs down....breathe up and eat up sheep...soon you die =(

  • watch?v=HbH05-JC9II Check it out.. Co2 measurement done in pounds and in laymen terms. Easy to understand.

  • Yep, that's why BO put good ol' Hillary all over the globe setting up the web of entanglement. She will be the first they put in line to have her head lobbed off once her usefulness to their agenda is over.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • first off,idiot.the IQ you refer to has nothing to do with intelligence.so that shows where your education is really paying off.it measures a persons ability to learn.that doesn't mean that you are learned..people like you wear your degrees like a crown.when it is a tool to do a job.unfortunately.handing idiots like you and that bunch a degree is like handing a three year old kid a hammer and telling him to fix a watch.odds are you will screw up more than you fix.and i also have a degree.

  • go ahead and take citizenship in switzerland.that's a good place for you.with the rest of the cowards who wouldn't stand up to hitler and had .....of all people....the allies(great britian,russia,and....wait for it.....THE UNITED STATES! THE ONE YOU CURSE.)fighting to protect YOU.and that crap about having every member of the country in the military,that would last about fifteen minutes in a REAL INVASION.this crap has gone on long enough.your science is false THERE IS NO MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE

  • @57roadbum :

    CORRECTION: previous generations of Americans were great

    PRESENT generations of Americans are brainless coward at the edge of total debility

    You are the one psycho about invasion - because you live in the past century - therefore you cannot identify new threat - you are an animal and only prepare against situations similar to what you have experienced in the past due to your limited brain.

  • @57roadbum : You have to live off a past glory which is not yours because you are a little pathetic thing.

  • @57roadbum : And by the way, science is held very high in esteem where I am - over 2/3rd of foreigners are university graduate - the IQ is one of the highest in the world.

    People do not believe there is a giant conspiracy of the elite to control them.

    Stay in your cornfield with your redneck and spend your sunday with your militia or ufologists.

  • lol, only in america

  • This is hilarious WordArt and the biggist load of BS misconstrued from the report. Grow a freaking brain. Good comedy though

  • Gore's