Added: 4 years ago
From: FantasticJK
Views: 107,414
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (286)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ultimate aero does 322kmh to 406kmh in 16s flat. doubt even the agera r will beat it, much less veyron SS.

  • according to the v box acceleration the standard aero with 1178 hpwhich is featured here out performs the ss veyron from a stop to top speed, there are two more aeros with more hp so ssc ftw.......

  • people are always going on about this car SAYING IT CAN DO 275MPH but you can see here that when it was just reaching 256mph it was struggling,well not struggling just it wasnt quite giving us hope that it can do the famous 275mph and its all estimations no facts.

  • @aerlingus18 Well to be honest, they Veyron was struggling way more at the same speed. I mean, the SS took like 2 miles to get from 250-267 whereas this did the whole thing in about 1/2 of Ehra Lesissens distance

  • aerlingus is right you know. You compare the topend accel of the aero with the topgear vid of Veyron SS Henry Raphenel doing 427++kmh on ehra, you can see the SSC aero's speed stagnating at 410kmh while the veyron SS keeps rising at quite a rate above 427kmh.

    the SSC has waaay faster topend accel than the veyron, but its topspeed is less.

  • @ASSHOLELA Well the video i have seen of the Veyron ss attaining its top speed, showed it struggling to get .1 MPH at a time whilst on a poor road surface, the SSC was able to accelerate from 240-250 far more easily than the bugatti

  • @edtri19

    well, that section of the vid you saw was James May driving the Bugatti SS, correct? That particular bugatti was limited to 258mph, like all other non-record SS. The power begins to be cut when the revs are close to 258mph, so thats why it appears to be struggling. Pierre Raphanel drove the non limited SS,( watch?v=LSFX9vrwJf8&feature=re­lated 5:15), 416- 420 in 2s, while this SSC aero, 410-413s in 4s (1st run) and staying at 409kmh for 3s (2nd run).

  • @aerlingus18

    Additionally, that SSC UA used race fuel for the run.

  • @Tippotipo Nice try, dumbass. But production top speed runs were certified by Guinness and cannot use race fuel. So epic fail, Veyron-Fanboi troll.

  • and i wonder why they chose this 2 mile only road to hit the topspeed.

    theres nevada desert; where thrust SSC broke the 1200kmh; death valley, boneville; home to all the wheel driven speed records, all less than 1000km away.

    the americans are the most fortunate people in the world when it comes to space for drag racing. And yet SSC is nagging about ehra lessein and all.

  • @ASSHOLELA Err but the record has to be done on tarmac so those areas you mentioned are not applicable.

  • @edtri19

    true, but the ferrari f40 record is done on a tarmac as well, and then there is the Mojave Airbase where a veyron GT reached 256mph.

    In fact, I google Mapped the highway the SSC was setting the record on, and its a full 10.5km long (> ehra 9.8km) ,highway 223 Washington , and it appears that SSC only used the first 2.5 miles of it.LOL/

  • @ASSHOLELA Of course, they could not simply shut down an entire highway. There is also no such thing as a Veyron GT only the SS

  • kit car or not it makes me happy to be a american

  • to all those shit people who say the SSC tops out at 273mph.

    Look at this vid:

    1:34. it hasnt even reached 412kmh and the speedo's going back on itself, 412-411-413.... and then just managed to inch to 414kmh for a split second or so.

    that means the SSC is TOPPING OUT. Read: not going any faster.if it cud do 273mph (440kmh) but there was not enough road, it'll still be acclerating like

    watch?v=IjFZrm_7kNQ&feature=re­lated 8:02 at 410, and then drastically braking once he's run out of road.

  • @ASSHOLELA You do know, a shorter bumpy road thats uneven has a Huge effect on acceleration and braking times right? The going bak up and down is proof of that road structure, compared to a slick road like Ehra, that will make all the difference.

  • @JellyBird12

    true, a short bumpy road has a great effect on acceleration. but not top speed.

    even if the road was bumpy, the speedo will still be able to crawl all the way to 440, if that was the topspeed.

    the point is, if it were bumpy, the speedo would read 414-413-416-415- 420-418 - 423- 420. The trend will be bumpy but its still increasing.

    this car did 413-414-413-414 for almost like 3 seconds it was stuck there,and only 415 for a split second.its proof that thats the topspeed.

  • @ASSHOLELA Nah, a Bumpy road can have a great effect on top speed, you can go faster on smooth surfaces, and road textures can efect under the car given the layout, and seeing how the SSC has a flat belly, thats even worse,

  • @ASSHOLELA Friction is a force that trys to stop motion between two things (like the ground and your car). Friction is affected by two things: the surfaces in contact, and the amount of force (or weight) between them. Rougher surfaces have more friction, and smooth surfaces have less. and the faster you go, the more difficult it becomes, Also, more weight means more friction, and more of that blocking you, slows you down, why do you think Ehra is a Slick flat smooth track as opposed to road?

  • the friction on a road is minimal compared to the drag on the wind. the tyres which are the only contact points with the road do not move relative to the road. when wheels are rotating, more rubber is added at the front end , and removed at the rear, like a pair of tracks.

    with the tyre patch on contact with the road most of the time,there is negligible friction at all.

    however, there is rolling resistance, which is the resistance of the tyre to being deformed into a contact patch.

  • @ASSHOLELA Rough/bumpy surfaces create more friction, because there are more little nooks and crannies for the two surface to hook together and slow each

    other down. You can image the rough surface tries to "dig in" to the

    Car, why do you think so many well prepared race tracks have slick roads as compared to your everyday road? because they are faster, wether its cornering speed, line speed, braking etc, the drag does have more effect, given what its Cd is, but the road can minimize that..

  • @ASSHOLELA Due to the Friction, more bumps on the road, is more friction, and considering how low the car is, that will be even worse, they can both half eacjother out depending on setup, too much friction will result in any car not being able to go to its true speed, wether you have the power and aero to reach it or not, why you think VW at Ehra lesian keep a constant check on its road conditions with pavenmentation? to make the road as friction free and slick as possible for cars 4 top speed.

  • @ASSHOLELA You take a 997 911 Sport Classic on a the Ehra track, and give it bumpy road conditions, it wil be anywhere between 8-12mph of its 189mph top speed, put it oon the Real track, it will reach it, and a good deal faster all the way, cars who have flat underbodies generate less friction because of lessimprinting, and less of that negatives alot of friction, having a high Cd can help and hurt frction due to wind resistance, but im sorta writing lol so ill leave it at that.

  • the thing is, neglecting rolling resistance is like adding hp, or more precisely, force, to the engine, and assuming that aero drag is the only major factor left.If you add the same amount of Force at 180mph vs 256mph for instance, the increase in speed will be less. In fact, it would be roughly half as much, (180/256)^2, if a porsche can go 8-12mph faster with out (or much less)rolling resistance, it should only be faster by 4-6mph at 256, which is pretty much the SSC's increase to 424kmh.

  • @ASSHOLELA You cannot foget gearing also, on this car, the SSC, it can be geared to whatever you desire, and making it tall, or taller, will have a much worse effect on top speed when alot of friction is involved, espescially if it takes longer to get there, and redline can be somewhere in between, more power on a slick road with faster accel, (Can) mean less friction givne the undercariage and materials.

  • @JellyBird12

    again, you are right. You can gear the SSC aero shorter, it will reach a higher speed as long as it does not redline there. but then again, the mclaren f1 reach its 240mph @ 7800rpm and around 600hp, (i have a dyno chart), so you can also say that the mac's topspeed is not 240mph, but 247mph because thats what it can reach at ideal 627hp @ 7400rpm. SSC themselves can produce another version with shorter gearing and test it, and then we can talk about how fast it will go then.

  • @ASSHOLELA If you Gear the Aero shorter, it will reach the redline no matter what, staller will make it faster, but theres no point if its too tall or short, and SSC woudltn short gear the SSC, not unless they made a pure track version, other than that, the gears are however you please, SSC 1183 already beats a Veyron, and thats saying alot, espescially with a dual clutch,

  • @JellyBird12

    the problem with long final gears is that the aerodynamic drag increases faster than the hp as the car revs towards optimum rpm. Eventually you reach a point where the car is not redlining or using full hp but cant go any faster.

    that was why the mc f1 engineers suggested a 7th gear instead of simply lengthening the 6th. by lengthening 6th gear by 10mph will cause the mclaren f1 to top out at 340-350kmh @ 5500+rpm, using about 500+hp.

  • @ASSHOLELA That only happens when you dont have the power to push tru the x neccesarry speed, its halfed, but at the same time the other interval can be doubled with the right application, and a tall gear will not make the car go any faste along with the redline simply because its too tall, not the Cd, that can have an effect, but not as much when you can apply the neccesarry counter measures, flat underbody and better Cd can ease that, wont totally, but the bits you need,

  • @ASSHOLELA And adjusting all the gears, to be insync with each other can coinsile the need for a 7th gear, along with bits of tuning to alot of the little parts instaed of just one big part, and the F1 never really had 627bhp to begin with, it started out with 350bhp, then rose to 550bhp, then they got more then they thought, and came with 627bhp, but its actually lot higher than that 730bhp to be exact as dyno'd by Ess Muri Culago of Northern Italys Stradale, so Mc is pretty much lyin bout hp.

  • @JellyBird12

    right. if mclaren is lying then cows can fly. LOL. more like Muri Culago is crapping.

  • every of the other 100 or so sources i've read say the mc has 627hp, if you say the mc has 730hp, well, prove it. and dont just cite another source.

  • @ASSHOLELA No, years of studying with teachers and proffesors who know what there talking about and have proved and passed there knoeledge along to there youths, it its ben proven about the Official power of the F1, thats fact, prove me wrong? i have the Number to Ess Muri with boss Antonio Vettarusi if you would like to verify it yourself? believe it or not, not my problem.

  • @JellyBird12

    ya but ess himself can say one thing. for all you may know he's the one's whose lying.

    ppl like ess have less credibitility than a manufacturer soof course, obviously, it means less to him if he lies/

  • @JellyBird12

    and i dont need to prove anything. every other source mags, websites, books, say the f1 has 627hp. you beg to differ. so that why you're obviously the one who must prove something.

  • @ASSHOLELA And do you really think its hard for manufakturs to lie about power output? if so, your quite ignorant, stock GT-R have put out 570hp, GT2's has put out 612hp, RS4 has put out 453hp, SLR has put out 651hp, ACR has put out 642hp, 575M has had 549hp, SL65 has had 702hp, avan Bugatti said the Veyron puts iut between 1020hp and 1200hp non SS, yet for some odd reason it, the F1 cant put out 730hp? cmon, dont be ignorant, Very few ppl dyno cars, and cars of this caliber, but few have.

  • @JellyBird12

    the only time when friction does occur is skidding.

    Although I do not deny there is more rolling resistance on a bumpy road, the change is not significant.

    if you apply the rolling resistance force formula, F = Crr x Nf, with Crr the coefficient being around 0.010 for most tyres, Nf the normal force being 14000N weight , plus maybe 3500 for downforce, you get only 175 Newtons, on a normal road.

    compare that with the 2163N aero drag the SSC experiences at 415kmh.

  • I made an error in the aero drag calculations, the figure should be 5014 N, drag = 1/2 x density of air x Cd x frontal area(m) x speed (m/s) ^2.

    anyway, even if there was asbolsutely NO rolling resistance, the car will only go up to 424kmh , vs the 434kmh the veyron SS with +17 hp did on ehra. thats a far cry from 445kmh.And even the slick ehra has rollling resistance.

  • @ASSHOLELA .......Yeah........I have a Masters in Aerospace Engineering, and Cube X class on Drag Xfs Resistances at DartMouth, I think i now a little something about Friction and its occurances...

  • @JellyBird12

    i dont have a masters anywhere FYI, i got all the info from the extensive research i've done over the month or so after i first met you debating on how fast the mclaren f1 GTR will go.

  • @ASSHOLELA Extensive research over a month, or continuing research over years?, yeah, i think ill stick with the years..anyhoo, and about the F1 GTR, lets just say we agree to disagree.

  • @JellyBird12 ]

    well, neither of us are professors, so lets stick with that. I get my info from physics websites and books, you get it from car mags.

  • @ASSHOLELA ..Yeah..I dont think i would have a masters if i got all my knowledge from car mags, reading about physics and what not is one thing, but actually doing it is another, your putting your month works of reasearch, vs my Years of research, cmon now.

  • @JellyBird12

    LOL u call reading car mags years of research? c'mon.

  • @ASSHOLELA And a bumpy road has a greater effect on top speed then accelerating, a bump road can keep you on a certain speed, but with this cars power and what not, i dont know what speed, plus, an extra 10 miles will make a difference too, and i dont know what it can and cant top out it, but put it on the ame track, possibly set its gears right, and a faster speed is unavaoidable. more power, less drag, better gearing, theres no reason why it wont go faster.

  • @JellyBird12

    i quoted the wrong kmh numbers, minus one.

  • Comment removed

  • Two words - Bugatti Supersport

    autoblog.com/2010/07/04/bugatt­i-veyron-16-4-super-sport-sets­-land-speed-record-at-267-81/

    USA 1 Europe 2

  • Here are some more words for you.

    SSC = kit-car built on kit-car budget with most bits out of other cars.

    Veyron = The pinacle of automotive excellence that nothing else will match for a decade regardless of who bolts together a scaffolding with an enormous engine and goes fast in a straight line.

  • @Janusha Agreed - good words -

  • Two Words... Bugatti Veyron

    give it a thumbs up!!

  • its not the record holder anymore, this vdeo needs the title changing. tooo hasbeen!

  • No longer the fastest! Thank fuck. Long live the veyron super sport.... 267mph.

  • @jorgelatin007 FAst like thunder while bugatti is lightning? look at the title of the video. the ultimate aero is faster. and since lightning is faster than thunder.. the ultimate aero is thchnically the lightning here.

  • Comment removed

  • Is Fats like Thunder, but Bugatti fast like lighthing.

  • I can't afford it but I love knowing the fastest car in the world is made in the USA.

  • @aaronme02 not any more the new bugatti supersport is faster look it up

  • Comment removed

  • SKii6868 @ ..... Thanks for the tips you fcukn retard... Nobody wants a lesson on the fastest car in the world..... Let the fagget Bugatti lovers talk shyt.. Only jews that eat cock meat sandwiches like a Bugatti for its price !!..... P.s ...... The Aero is less then half the price of the Bugatti and its 4mph faster.. LMAO

  • I completely agree with your comment.

    Plus the Bugatti doesn't look nearly as good as the SSC Aero, of course that's just an opinion.

  • To those who have a hard on for the Bugatti; listen.

    The Bugatti doesn't even make it in the books as far as records. Sorry, Top Gear, doesn't count.

    The Aero has been "Officially" marked by Guiness as the world's fastest car.

    Think of it this way, you still have the Thrust SSC to brag about.

    Other than that. Quit being stupid and jealous. Look up the facts before you speak

    and get back to your Wii/PS/Xbox/GtaLife

  • skii6868

    Believe me, I hold no allegiance to any one particular vehicle. All this exotica is financially outta reach for practically all of us anyway.

    However, to say "Top Gear" doesn't count is ridiculous. It's the world's premier motoring show, going out to virtually every country on Earth.

    The Aero WAS the Guinness record holder but has since been usurped by the Koenigsegg CCXR (according to what i've read.)

    Not that I could care less....!

  • The SSC was designed with one goal in mind - to take the top speed record from the Veyron whereas the Veyron was designed to be the epitome of engineering excellence. Top speed alone is largely irrelevant, being only one measure of a vehicle's performance. How fast a vehicle laps tracks is the only significant issue in terms of measuring overall speed. As such, a car like the supercharged Ariel Atom would thrash the SSC on any twisty track (not to mention the fact it's 10 times cheaper too!)

  • @nigee008 An ATom Thrashing The SSC on a track? lol Are you high? Even a ZO6 beats it round Virginia International Raceway and Murricio race track, so, that theory is quite wrong.

  • It has a 3mph top speed advantage over the Veyron (WOW) but the fact is the Veyron accelerates quicker, is built far better, is far more sophisticated and (unlike the SSC) through it's superior European engineering, will last (unlike the SSC which will eventually break down and fall to bits.) Besides, the top speed record for a production car has now come back to Europe with the Swedish Koenigsegg CCXR, achieving a top speed of 259.2 mph.

    All the finest exotica has always come from Europe.

  • Not so, the UASSCTT has hit 259.6 mph after being allowed to use the VW tack in europe.

  • lol... All of the over priced exotica has always come from Europe. Not say I don't like many european brands just to say all the finest come from europe is quite funny.

  • Geylgamesh

    Well, all the world's legendary marques are European....

    BTW - I reiterate, I'm no fanboy. Too old for posters on my wall, besides, none of us posting here on YT could ever afford such exotica anyway.

  • You probably know more about exotica then me, but the way you made it sound is that other developers outside of european make completely inferior models.

    And luckly for me, the cars I truly like are affordable.

    Import Tuners, Muscle Cars, are all I desire.

    But when my book goes through, I'll probably look into getting an Aero SSC, Saleen S7, Ford GT, or Lambo.

    I'm not a fan boy either, I like most cars just think some are over priced in my opinion.

  • Good luck with your novel...

  • Thanks for the support.

  • Cadillac is one of the worlds legendary marques too. They've produced iconic cars that have defined an era, like the 50's, and have achieved some important innovations, and has produced one the most innovative cars in the past which was officially named one of automotives important cars.

  • @Geylgamesh yeah and its funny they make people pay 100k for a family sedan with a v12 in it while in america we pay 30k for sedan to get the job done and comes with v8 that produces close tot he power of the gass gussling v12. I DONT KNOW HOW YOU CAN DEFEND A PRICE TAG OF 100k WITH A 30k price tag?

  • @nigee008 just letting you know when u hit super cars there is no such thing as reliability just letting you know aero needs minor cam shaft and piston work for tuning because it is a simple v8 your veyron has to be shipped back to germany every tune up to be disassembled and worked on again then re shipped to you ? reliability is not factor when buying a super car BECAUSE A SUPER CAR HAS A RACING ENGINE YOU FUCKING RETARDED KID~!

  • @chud89 A-men!!! Nice point, I will use this form now on when fighting Bugatti fags.

  • Bugatti is better

  • lol for a million dollars more? no way

  • Yes, our rights to speed that could rival some thing, but I swear by the Lord of the universe can not reach the speed of light ... the happy opportunity deadly Aero-loving people to ....^_^

  • slow

  • Batman still drives a Lambo

  • my grand national will dust it

  • BAHAHAHA

  • Hey don't laugh. The GNX is one hell of a car if enough work is put into it.

  • what's the name of the song?

  • Veyron, SSC, McLaren... it doesn't matter...

    In less than 5 years most of the supercars will have the top speed of 400+km/h, and rare one will hit the speed between 430-460 km/h

  • ok..i had some idiot reply to a comment i made on the ssc holding the record of top speed...he claimed the Veyron did 259 and said he had driven both cars...and i thought to myself...if he had driven both cars...how is it possible that he didnt know that Guiness certified the SSC as the world record holder?...lol..also..why couldnt he just look it up as proof before mouthing ...he was irate that we all thought the SSC was the fastest car and not the Veyron...things that make you go...hmmmm....

  • veyron holds a record for fastest acceleration.. so the aero has the top speed, but bugatti accelerates faster

  • watch bugatti vs mclaren in topgear in youtube...the mclaren accelerates faster but bugatti won..

  • There is huge turbo lag in hot humid climate. This get's worse when you have four of them! After the turbos spooled in the higher rpm, the Veyron was then able to catch and pass the mclaren. I believe the veyron can go faster than is reported given the right conditions, and the fact that the company limited the speed for safety and reliability issues.

  • Veyron only beats the SSC to 60 and that's only just. By 60 the SSC is accelerating at a much faster rate than the Bugatti is. Only reason SSC loses out is wheelspin at the beginning of acceleration.

  • only to 60, then the 4wd ( similar to a truck) doesnt matter, and the ssc will thrash the fat beetle

  • I think the fact that they made an electric version do 208 is more impressive. Electrics usually piddle along.

  • which accelarates faster veyron or this?

  • this

  • Search race video : Topgear Mclaren vs Veyron

  • i want to see it go through the grass.

  • 9/ 13/ 2007??? we got mega car running at warp speed but dial up software for testing.

  • What's the name of the soundtrack?!

  • @guzlla I think that the music must be from northern Europe. The string instrument at the beginning of this video (0-22s, 0:44 - 1:06) is called "Kantele", better known as a "Finnish zither"

    The SSC Ultimate Aero TT is by far the most scariest four-wheel car ..... IN THE WORLD!

  • The veyron handles extremely well because of AWD and lots of weight? Check top gear?

    Did you not see the part where the veyron absolutely raped the Zonda F in a drag race and then proceeded to handle and brake so badly that the Pagani still beat its power lap time?

  • I want to see the SSC Ultimate Aero Vs The Bugatti Veyron Now that would be a Race to Remember.

  • Comment removed

  • Great car, I like it, but I would like to see some real long test where I could see the speed from the inside as they did with Veyron...btw, I like Veyron more, beacause it's more like every-day use car, but we'll see what Koenigsegg CCGT will do about the title of fastest car in the world =)

  • DONT SAY THIS IS ROAD LEGAL CAUSE I LOVE BUGATTI VEYRON!!!!

    is it road legal??? xD

  • $600,000

  • So the Bugatti Veyron isn't the most fastest street legal car. How much does this car cost?

  • around 700k. Still cheaper than a veyron.

  • My 99 Regal would smoke this car any day HA!

  • This car was built for the people that want to go fast. The veyron is good and all. but if you want that feeling of being in controle of a mad BEAST. get an SSC aero. And regardless of what anybody says....this car is just amazing and i would love to own one....maybe when i win the lottery...as if

  • i want to see the face off..btwen the two fastest car n the wolrd..Bugatti vs SSC..

  • i love this car but i read allthe shit U noobs said,;being the fastest doesnt mean is the most reliable,its twinturbo ,and big cubic capacity and super square piston,this car can give more than that BUT the bugatti is 16 holes its more reliable in life than an super boost engine,try to do that everyweekend and lets see who s gonna change cars first,,that s it WHOS WITH ME MOTHFUKERS=?

  • the diffrence betwen this and the Bugatti is that the Bugatti was built to a true day to day user frendly car that was the fastest. This thing was just built to be the fastest production car. the bugatti is twice the weight because it has loads of mods and cons this thing don't even have powere steering or air con imagine trying to turn a corner in this thing in London you will have arms like Hulk Hogan!!

    I'M WITH YOU!!!!!!

  • YES U R right!!

    a car is build for a specif way of driving,and lets say,every car particulary for a reason.lets save some money to test one of this cars before we die right hahahah

  • Dude, go watch jay leno's video (on his website) where he drives the SSC, it DOES have air con....not sure about pwr steering. Not that it matters, this car was designed to be a hardcore animal, something that will give you a true feeling of taming a beast.

  • The air-con was a typo. what i meant to say is that it don't have powere steering ABS and traction control. I know these are available for on the options list when buying the car, buth the car that did 257 didn't have any of these thing which means it would have got a higher top speed because of less weight. You can only be a hardcore driver when you have space or a track with the SSC

  • this car is faster than the bugatti by like....8 mph give or take a few

  • best handling race car is the ferrari 360 as said by micheal shumacher said himself and trust me hes drove to many cars to find that out

  • He is also sponsored by ferrari.

  • beast

  • Comment removed

  • here a little fact bugati Veyron 16cyl 4 turbos, 1001HP, 1.6 million dollars. ssc aero 8 cyl 2 turbos 1250hp , 700,000$ more car for you money but dont tell the europeans they love over engineering and over pricing everything to make it look like they know what there doing.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Well we all can't wrap everything around cheat plastic covers and then over price it can we? There is basically only one american car worth buying - the Ford GT - and that consist in majority of european parts.

  • dmj your absolutely right but the ford GT is anything but american it made up of parts from norway, britain, and italy. the ssc was made and assembled using only parts made from the US

  • The GT was designed completely in America. The engine, chassis, body is all built in America. So are a lot of other parts. A few parts like wheels and brakes are outsourced, but every company does that for performance vehicles anyways.

    So it is mostly American.

    SSC, Saleen S7, Mosler MT900, and Corvette ZR1 are all amazing American cars.

  • US sucks

  • The veyron 407 km/h this shit 414 km/h not big differende even at that speed. Let's take it this way. The veyron has an amazing interior, leather seats, air condition. etc the Aero has nothing (much lighter) Everyone heard about the Veyron, not many people about the SSC. The Americans built the SSC just to beat the veyron, but it beats the Veyron ONLY on speed. Just wait for the Porsche to build the next 9ff generation, European cars are the best:)

  • That`s all nice a cool. Till Veyron guy gets caught at a 1 to 5 mile stoplight, then gun`s his engine with the smell of victory in his nostrils. Only to get schooled a mile down the road by a car "he never heard of". When he finally catches up at the next light he rolls down window "WTF is that!! Oh! an SSC Aero. How much? 700,000 US dollars. Says thanx, then rolls up window (bitter taste in mouth) and thinks to himself

    Damn!!! I`ve paid too much! Coulda saved 700 g`s and gotten more women!!

  • typical idiot, a super car is only built for one thing and one thing only SPEED. if i want nice leather ill buy D&G or Gucci. plus the veyron cant handle for shit it handles as well as a battleship. ssc aero has those goodies as well. btw porshce made there super its called the carrera gt but oh ya it sux thats why you didnt know about it

  • Veyron handles extremly well since it have 4WD and lot of weight, just check top gear when testing top speed and lap time, its totally undramatic .Although Veyron/Aero handles well, they can never be the fastest cars on a track since they mostly are buildt for extreme top speed. Veyron is a luxury car that can reach over 400km/h, and that is a huge achievement beyond just a powerful engine.For a more similar competiror to Aero check out video of: Chris Harris test drives the Porsche 9FF GT9

  • dont make it sound like this is a 5,000lb 4 door family car ok, this is a 2dr 2 seater rear engine supercar and no way in hell does it out handle an Aero keep dreaming just cuz its AWD doesnt mean it handles well, watch the video on top gear when it races a jet plane and has to make a u-turn. you know it cant handle because Bugatti wont let top gear take it on the track for a lap. that car will fall on its face on a real track

  • Yes it has only 2 doors, but It handles like a luxury car, its not a typically bumby racingcar but a supercar that you can use on bumpy european coyntryroads. Bugatti is tested on top gears lap, but only the first veyron with "only" 987hp. Check out: Bugatti Veyron & Zonda F Stig Laps - Top Gear - BBC

    If you still think the Veyron handles badly, check out: Fifth Gear - Bugatti Veyron Part 2 and: Fifth Gear - Bugatti Veyron Part 3

  • The first veyron with 987hp?

    All Veyron's have 987hp. It has 1001metric hp. 987 net. And that is on 93 octane not 91. SSC makes 1287 net on 91. The Veyron has almos 2x the power of the Zonda and it has a slower lap time. Therefore it has bad handling. A Z06 w/ half the power is as fast around Nurburgring, therefore the Veyron has bad handling.

  • Comment removed

  • Audi R8 is considered by many to be the best handling sportscar ever, but its far from the fastest sportscar.

  • Handling and speed is not always the same thing. The Veyron with all its luxury is to heavy to compete with a clean racing car. The Zonda is a very light car with very stiff suspension perfect for a track, but on a bumpy mountainroad it would have been much more easy to drive the Veyron, even if you not are a racingdriver(good handling) You have to be a skilled racingdriver to drive Zonda and SSC in the same way.

  • The Zonda and SSC still handle better. They get around curves faster. That is good handling, the ability to go around a corner fast. The Veyron cannot.

    Now it does not take a skilled driver to go fast in the SSC or Zonda. It takes a skilled driver to reach its max potential.

    A non racing driver could go as fast in an SSC as a they could in a Veyron BUT a racing driver could rape the Veyron in the SSC.

  • @TheOfficialKC Then we might say that the Veyron is a modern muscle car

  • Europeans has allways buildt cars for handling since we have a lot of mountain roads with turns and corners. Traditionally this has been achieved by using stiffer dampers and springs than used on Amarican cars. Veyron is not breaking that tradition but use tecnology from the german upperclass cars to combine stiffness and comfort. The Porsche 9FF GT9 is more like the older european supercars and the Aero.

  • Marsteintoppen you are right for most of that. I just want to add, the suspension you are talking about is magnetic ride suspension. It was invented by GM.

  • aero = fastest production car no 2nd questions about it

    btw since veron is heavey... it sucks at breaking

  • You kind of kept it one sided there.

    The Veyron has an amazing interior, AC, and a really nice ride quality but it handles and brakes like shit. The Aero has a trash interior with very few creature comforts but it can brake and handle a lot better because it is more of a raw track car. Both cars are quick and fast. Its about what the buyer wants rather than trying to say one is better than the other.

  • The SSC has AC, alcantera(leather option) interior, nav system, 7 speakers, cd/dvd/mp3 player, tv screen, backup camera, and air lift. Plus I like the instruments because they are focused for driving purposes. Set up for what you need most.

  • THE FASTEST CAR IN THE WORLD IS THE Mercedes-Benz T80. TOP SPEED: 750 km/h

  • yooure right it is, but these 2 cars are more like street cars.

    and the t80 is like the f1

    which is more like for profecional racing

  • Actually the fastest car on earth to date is Team Vesco`s "Turbinator", clocked at 470mph / 756kph. Their goal is to break the 500mph barrier.

    The Mercedes Benz T80 750kph is based on projected expectations. It was never raced because of the onset of WW2. Today it sits in the Mecedes Benz museum.

    You`ll find 2 Turbinator videos in my Turbocharged playlist.

    America has produced the world`s fastest wheel driven speed record, and the fastest production vehicle on planet earth.

  • no not really thrust ssc is faster

  • What would jesus drive? one of these!!

  • vtecboi18 the viper is a shelby cobra want a be. shelby worked with dodge a while then they worked with ford and dodge was jealos of the cobra so they made the viper and the new viper still doesn't beat the old cobra. A.K.A. the viper SUCKS! no affence to dodge

  • finally the americans got the upper hand,

    americans always fell behind europeans in automobiles, but these guys came up with a car which busted their fastest ever built vehicle,

    gud job guys

    cheers to all the ppl behind SSC AERO

  • this&the veyron are like>blink and you missed them!

  • agreed.

    italian race cars are the most famous in the world.

    (because they are the best ones)

  • you realy think Bugatti is Italian xD lol

    i mean, i"ve met alot of stupid european car fanboys in my life but never one that was stupid enough to say buggati is italian

  • Bugatti, as a car manufacturer company, is french; but the brain who created it was Ettore Bugatti: an Italian automobile designer.

    And by the way italian race cars, do are the most famous: Ferrari, Lamborghini, Maserati, Alfa Romeo... do they sound familiar to you?

  • The bugatti WAS italian... but now is of company volkswagen.

  • Bugatti was a french brand it never was italian, the factory where the veryron is made is in France.... so bugatti = a french car! so it will be normal when he stops and surrender when he sees a German car xD

  • Bugatti was originally Italian. VW, a German brand, owns them now. The current factory is in France.

    Whatever way the Veyron sucks.

  • dude the road is bumpy as fuck... dont hate because we have a faster car with a smaller motor and less turbos... and truthfully we like to hear the power our cars are making if you like your shit quiet then thats koo, but fuck that I wanna hear the power that my rides make.

  • stfu ima fan of japanese and europen cars and this is bad ass along with the viper and a 1969 chevy chevelle and the pontiac g8 and u are from afghanistan u really need to stfu cause your county aint shit every time we over there fighting wars for u and giving y'all money bunch of ingrets

  • wtf, these afghaners pown americans in war, the only thing the americans have, is a big number of people. Thats all they got. But i love american cars, but it is crappy :P

  • we have alot more then just people, but i agree with u most american cars do suck but the cars i named are badass but like i said i'm mostly a japanese and european car enthusiast.