storm is actually for more intellegent then any of you 2012 nimrods could even begin to understand.... so just die off and let the rest of us go on living
This video proves nothing, the pictures are clearly taken from a different angle. I have to say that your attempt to show there are differences falls under the category of delusional!!
someone point him in the direction of a good photography site or try to explain the difference to him when you take 2 completely different photo's of the same subject but with slightly different angles perspective and more than likely different cameras = debunked
Second of all you base the line of sight argument from the area underneath the telescope, but you cannot possibly imagine a ladder or even standing from the side of the telescope. Also you did not even show the backside of the telescope where there could be a standing area, thanks for your attempt at a debunk, when you try at least bring forth plausible evidence like PS does.
First of all I like how the picture is so blurry to allow the claims that it is not the Hale telescope to be disputed, second of all I also like how you base a piece of evidence on a supposed "light bulb" location, when there are lightbulbs in the general vicinty. Of course taking a blurry shot of a distant lightbulb is hardcore evidence..righttt.
I agree with 2012 Nugget. Also I was on a flight from Frankfurt,Germany to SFO and sat next to a professor of physics in WA who was just returning from doing a sabbiatcal at CERN. I spoke with him about the possible existance of a telescope at CERN and he just laughed, saying "absolutely not true".
sorry pal, I accidentally removed your comment when I was going to reply. as I said, no proof CERN has a telescope, only these are two different telescopes.
Looks like the same photo at different angles and light conditions........Sorry but you failed to show me that those are two different photos. .OnePeace.
Ok pal, but there is no angle difference between the pictures, and all possible effects caused by light were considered. I find it very unlikely a metal bar is pointing down at a different angle due to light effects, and the same thing for the black circle, the light bulbs and the unreflective structure at the end of the vid. Anyway, I'm working on a quality version of this video to make it simpler and w/ enhanced images. perhaps this one changes your mind.
Nugget i dont get you? Are you in the middle of all this 2012 stuff? Cause i remeber you saying a negative comment about ProjectStorm... I know you can believe in what you want to...
I cant see why ppl have rated this video as 1 star... its just another video from another view 5 stars from me!!
storm is actually for more intellegent then any of you 2012 nimrods could even begin to understand.... so just die off and let the rest of us go on living
NOHOAXERS 4 months ago
storm was full of shit and he is a jealous mad man.
SONOFTHORHAMMER 4 months ago
projectstorm is the man.
philos4r 5 months ago
This video proves nothing, the pictures are clearly taken from a different angle. I have to say that your attempt to show there are differences falls under the category of delusional!!
Airthumbs 10 months ago
i dont understand...who/what is project storm?
EasyMoney04 2 years ago
Comment removed
Bonacker303 2 years ago
Just like yo mommas!
IIBobaFettII 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
Bonacker303 2 years ago
No I have fun with YOUR mum. Dipshit.
IIBobaFettII 2 years ago 3
its ok. i agree. i have a real life. u win.
Bonacker303 2 years ago
someone point him in the direction of a good photography site or try to explain the difference to him when you take 2 completely different photo's of the same subject but with slightly different angles perspective and more than likely different cameras = debunked
dirtonmylens 3 years ago 3
The images of the Hale telescopes you use are using interesting types of lense, which will distort the surroundings.
One of the pictures you get of the Hale telescope is labeled as one taken with a 'fisheye lense'. Not unlike the picture project storm presented.
Therefore it is likely, as you have shown, that there will be distortions between the two.
Your argument in that case, adds no weight to the argument.
The 'light bulb' in CERNs picture is also lense flare.
I'm a photographer
cneb3000 3 years ago 2
No matter what is said, They cannot prove you wrong !
NoStarPanel 3 years ago
projectstorm is back and you frauds are going down again
nicetryassmunch 3 years ago 3
Second of all you base the line of sight argument from the area underneath the telescope, but you cannot possibly imagine a ladder or even standing from the side of the telescope. Also you did not even show the backside of the telescope where there could be a standing area, thanks for your attempt at a debunk, when you try at least bring forth plausible evidence like PS does.
scfisherman 3 years ago 2
First of all I like how the picture is so blurry to allow the claims that it is not the Hale telescope to be disputed, second of all I also like how you base a piece of evidence on a supposed "light bulb" location, when there are lightbulbs in the general vicinty. Of course taking a blurry shot of a distant lightbulb is hardcore evidence..righttt.
scfisherman 3 years ago 2
gizmoandgodiva said:
I agree with 2012 Nugget. Also I was on a flight from Frankfurt,Germany to SFO and sat next to a professor of physics in WA who was just returning from doing a sabbiatcal at CERN. I spoke with him about the possible existance of a telescope at CERN and he just laughed, saying "absolutely not true".
sorry pal, I accidentally removed your comment when I was going to reply. as I said, no proof CERN has a telescope, only these are two different telescopes.
Oriokami 3 years ago
Looks like the same photo at different angles and light conditions........Sorry but you failed to show me that those are two different photos. .OnePeace.
2012nugget 3 years ago
Ok pal, but there is no angle difference between the pictures, and all possible effects caused by light were considered. I find it very unlikely a metal bar is pointing down at a different angle due to light effects, and the same thing for the black circle, the light bulbs and the unreflective structure at the end of the vid. Anyway, I'm working on a quality version of this video to make it simpler and w/ enhanced images. perhaps this one changes your mind.
Thanks for the feedback.
Oriokami 3 years ago
No problem,look forward to the new one.
OnePeace
2012nugget 3 years ago
Nugget i dont get you? Are you in the middle of all this 2012 stuff? Cause i remeber you saying a negative comment about ProjectStorm... I know you can believe in what you want to...
I cant see why ppl have rated this video as 1 star... its just another video from another view 5 stars from me!!
iWillGoogleYourName 3 years ago
projectstorm is back!
i told you people you can't stop the truth from coming out!
nicetryassmunch 3 years ago 3