Added: 3 years ago
From: drfloyd9000
Views: 262,812
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10,081)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dodge #740 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

  • See comments below, eminaidiot aka seymouron.

  • Dodge #735 komododidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson?  Recreation? Hmmm?

  • More fake account spam, eh eminaidiot.

  • Dodge #727 komodidiot

  • lmao bigfoot bahahahahah shows u people will believe in anything.

  • Spam dodge #3485 eminaidiot aka seymour.

  • dodge #715 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

  • Dodge #714 komodidiot

  • Chang mask, the guy's last name's Chang so using the first name shows eminbozo's idiocy. Anyway, can't be Patty because she's too tall. Her torso's longer than a man's, and since her legs are in full view the upper body can't be a man's. Means no fake, as no mask could be reached. Thus no fake arms either, etc. Simple. It's already been determined by experts, but manics like eminbozo won't budge. That there's no pads or seam lines also explained; it's skin underneath. Suits were never like this.

  • 'Bones on suits'. Always did love that one. lol See, here's the thing with eminbozo, garrynec; she won't accept any experts if the findings go against her personal views, that's the kind of fanaticism we're dealing with here. No scientist or f/x with another conclusion will be accepted, only those few saying it's fake will be. The difference of course is, the latter ones haven't examined the footage as close as pro-Pattys concluding it's real. World of science's changing views in PGF/BF favor.

  • Does anyone know what the name of this show is? I had bits and pieces of this exact segment on tape during the late 90s. Makes me remember when the Discovery Channel was actually an interesting network, not the joke it is today.

  • Comment removed

  • i believe that big foot is a hairy Canadian and if bigfoot is real then Man-bear-Pig is real.

  • Dodge #683 komodidiot

    Ken Peterson?  Recreation?

    Geek.

  • I have to say with the film being so low quality and the "creature" being so far away, any speculations about how real it looks are just that, speculations.

  • If you still think so that only proves you're mad. lol

  • The Wah Chang mask is the final nail in the coffin for this hoax.

  • Why don't "they" recreate it then, if it's just a man in a suit? That's the question "they" can't answer. It's never been debunked, that's merely another silly rumor, like Roger's deathbed confession that never happened, etc. But thanks to liars like seymoron the unenlightened will fall for any misinformation, nothing's easier in today's world than spreading false info. He's doing it daily here. If he's referring to those university athletes, their gait failed big time looked nothing like Patty.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer Why don't they recreate it?

    They probably can't find shitty enough film and a shitty enough camera man.

  • Garrry-"they" can not debunk it? Who are "they"? Actually the film has been debunked in several university studies as being completely human. Its a man in a suit---and there's no credible scientific evidence to prove otherwise.

  • @seymourbbest actually it has been proved where it may be real, they're still not sure though, but because the "suit" moves so well with the body it also seems like it moves with the muscles. This wasn't in university studies either, these were scientists. Even though I do know that university studies are legit.

  • So true. I wonder what it is that, in light of all this top expertise, make some cling to the hoax lie for dear life. It's beyond mad at this point, so it must be a deep-rooted desire for #1 the film to be fake and #2 the existence of BF. Or vice versa. In spite of 1000s of sightings, they still won't believe it's true, and that attitude is the equivalent to doubters of world travelers coming home with tales of new found lands and strange people. Or DNA soon even worse; old flat Earth believers.

  • This video has been analyzed by the best of the best, they cannot debunk it. To top it off, think about this. This was shot back in the late 60s, right around the time of the first Planet of the Apes. That movie represented the best special effects that millions of dollars could buy and for that time and their apes were clearly people in suits. But the physical anatomy of the creature featured here would be impossible to duplicate with 60s suit-technology-and that sir, is a fact.

  • to go further....the limbs, joints and torso, no matter how you configure it, can never match up to a human skeleton. A joint is a joint in a suit or not (knees, elbows etc), then the length of the torso. Again, the best biologists, anatomists and special effects professionals in the world cannot explain this film other than it is the real deal...big foot. And I know for a fact, those professionals know much more than some snot nosed little brat on youtube.

  • @garrrynec

    You can't draw bones on suits, stupid.

    This is a man in bad fur suit.

  • @eminboztepe you can't draw bones on a suit? WTF are you talking about...are you high? The joints, where two limps attach, move the same whether in a suit or not. The anatomy of the joints of the creature featured here don't match to a human skeleton. Period. This is simple biology, so I'm not sure why you're calling ME stupid you snot nosed little brat.

  • @garrrynec

    WRONG. I can send you a link showing you that can't draw bones on suits.

  • @eminboztepe further more...i decided to look at this video logically. It has never been disproved by the best of the best in their respective fields (biology, special F.X, camera tech, anthropology etc). These are specialists whose primary objective was to find reason within this video. They still cannot to this day. That speaks volumes to anyone with at least half a brain. Too bad you're just too closed minded to think logically and unbiased in your conclusion about this video.

  • @garrrynec

    Watch my youtube video on this hoax and then explain the Wah mask, the upside down shoulder muscle, the butt pad, seam lines, etc. Ask your "experts" to explain that.

    Anyone "with half a brain" will see that it's just a man in a bad fur suit. How is it possible that bigfoot has the EXACT same weird characteristics as suits in the 60's? Explain away. I'm all ears.

  • The Chang mask's no proof, if anything it's proof PGF's no hoax, only its supporters' insanity does it prove. lol Why even mention it, doesn't look the first bit like Patty, but more importantly BlobH or anybody couldn't reach any mask since Patty's torso's too long. That's how Bigfoot anatomy is, unfakeable, see any monster flick. And since her legs are in perfect view, they can't be a man's because that man couldn't reach her top body. Easy does it, and easier than that it doesn't get. Get it.

  • eminaidiot aka seyeybutt, sftu. lol Your hoax support here's virtually zero, consisting mostly of your own fake accounts/assorted other useless freaks attracted to your stench. But since you're so backwards, here it is for millionth time. I've never mentioned Ken Peterson you did, you brought him up. I only said cartoonists/animators also know about suits, some not all. I've never said you want a recreation either, obviously you do not, because we all know it's impossible. Just look at Blevins.

  • dodge #545 komododiot aka reclaimer

    I'm not talking to you about anything else until you back up your claim about Ken Peterson or me wanting a recreation. lol

  • this gives me an idea to dress up in a gorilla costume ( similar to the one in the video) and get paid thousands of dollars, but I'll do it in like china or something and convince them that it's legit. I guess there's only one downside of this, and that's that I'll have to be annoyed by dumbasses all the time like the ones on animal planet

  • Recreate the suit then, eminbozo. lol Why do you think all, and that really is all, Bigfoot monster movies look the way they do? It's because it's the only way they can do. And why the PGF 100% shows no suit, but the real thing. Hard to accept for some they exist maybe, but that's just too bad isn't it. You got one of them right there on film.

  • All lies, of course. The damning facts of human anatomy vs. that of the Sasquatch cannot be ignored, except they will be by the likes of eminbozo & co. Never mind, some people are simply prone to accepting so-called 'confessions' rather than scientific progress and reality, but the world knows the truth now via TV episodes like American Paranormal's on Bigfoot. No more doubt left, last hoax nail finally brought down, hammered in hard as hell. And more is coming eventually, the proof of DNA.

  • No way odd, rare and unusual for sure, but not odd. You are.

  • Lucky --dont you find it odd that bigfoot is supposedly stealthy and quickly flees even from the scent of humans in its area but this one appearing in front of a man with a rented camera and only 1 minute of film just strolls off leisurely? There'd be trophy bigfoot heads all over the uSa if these things were real and ambled off like this.

  • There was no Patty costume, ever. Certainly wasn't BobH either, ask any stunt man for that matter now you're so hot on them, it's practically impossible to walk with your 'normal stride' all dressed up hidden inside a big hairy suit. Besides, this is a typical Bigfoot gait. Flat out not doable, so who are you trying to fool. And complicated it'd have to been too, unlike any other BF suit ever seen before or since. Bottom line is just, that some folks don't like anatomy and f/x facts.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer you have a point, some people are asking me why would the bigfoot look back at them, I say well its probobly reacting to the cameraman's reaction, how would you react when you see something like this, would you be silent when you start filming it or would you freak out and tell your friends "look at that", that's probably why it looked back because it heard them freaking out.

  • You think the patterson family will show you the costume? They charge 10000 to allow the film to be used. Lack of costume does not make a filmed animal real. If no one can find a flying monkey costume from the wizard of oz does that make flying monkeys real?

  • Bob Heironimus has duplicated his walk over and over.you can find the comparison vids here on YT. He states he just used his normal stride while wearing the costume.

  • @seymourbbest why has no costume been recovered or brought forward?

  • @koolkevinc

    Common sense question for you. You hoax a film using a costume. What would YOU do with the costume?

    For all murderers out there...what do YOU do with the murder weapon afterwards?

    Nixon should have burned the tapes! LOL

  • @eminboztepe if it is a hoax why is that bob heirwhatever dude claim its hoax? if he did make the film didnt he want it to be interpreted as legit? So why is he now claiming its a hoax? If you murdered someone it would make sense to dispose of the weapon, but why would you then claim you did the murder? Use your common sense.

  • @koolkevinc

    Umm....not following you here. Bob told many people it was a hoax back in the early 70's. In fact, everyone in the area all said he wore the suit. He was promised a $1,000 dollars for wearing the suit but was never paid. After talking to his lawyer he was told that he could not be held liable for fraud since he was never paid. Yes, common sense.

  • @koolkevinc

    Also, Al DeAtley, Roger's brother in law, financed the film. He admits today that it was a hoax and confirms Bob's involvement.  He confirms how Bob asked him about his money for wearing the suit. Now why is that?

  • @eminboztepe alot of he said she said stuff. no hard proof. i want the suit.

  • @koolkevinc

    The proof? The Wah Mask. That's proof.

  • It's 2012. Where's the Klutzmour report?

  • Its 2012. Where's the Ketchum report?

  • Again you're showing you're misinformed. She walks exactly as she should, and to be expected from something that may actually be more human and not ape. It's crazy, whenever people think of BF what do they think it is? Yup, some apeman of sorts. But whenever folks watch PGF, they somehow won't believe their eyes, and suddenly have this wild idea it's now supposed to be an ape only. What happened to the man in apeman? That's precisely what they are; men, if you will. Patty's female, but you know.

  • Yeah something walked in front of the camera. A man in a gorillas suit. Pay particular attention to the way this so-called bigfoot walks. It looks like a man walking. Not at all like the way people who claim to have seen a real bigfoot describe its movement.

    Can we say F A K E?

  • @tortugabob uh no you'r wrong a man can't walk like that or it cant walk that fast so it's real

  • @ramonundertaker

    A man can't walk hunched over while taking long steps?  LOL

  • @eminboztepe i know that im saying this footage is real

  • @ramonundertaker

    I've seen the headpiece and read Al DeAtley's confession as well as the background on this film. It's a hoax. No doubt.

  • @eminboztepe and that dosen't mean its fake have you ever heard of a replica i mean com on

  • @ramonundertaker

    Replica? What would be the point? No one shoots film in Kodachrome due to the poor quality.  And yet that's what we see here. I mean, come ON.

  • Comment removed

  • @eminboztepe have you ever heard of the bull munns analysis

  • @ramonundertaker

    Bill Munns admitted his first analysis was based on guesswork and that a new one was pending. He is a facial make-up man with no expertise in 60's suits.

  • If i were big foot, I would've ran and jumped at that btch filming . js

  • Wasn't science that said the earth was flat ;p

  • Patterson film is legit!!!!!

  • It's kind of weird because I'm sitting at my laptop watching this and there is a bigfoot documentry on TV and it featured this.

  • I find the irony amazing that people believe that there is no evidence of sasquatch, while the species continues to make a mockery of our relatively lame efforts to find them.

  • You find it amazing, blahblah. How about this; f*ck off then. lol 

  • I find it amazing that there are people out there that believe in this sh*t. You might be a redneck. . . The Patterson film has duped these bigfoot believers or idiots if you will for years. And what are the odds that this idiot Patterson just happened to be in the right spot to see a bigfoot ( LOL ). It's comical. Although I do believe he was quoted as saying, "Action, Cut, that's a Take". Show me an asshole and I'll show you a bigfoot believer.

  • seyeyscience, maybe. The rest of us know enugh to conclude the so-called Bigfoots indeed exist, hell, seyeyblob's even living proof himself by the daily lame spam.

  • idk

  • "Science" has figured it out. Bigfoot doesn't exist.

  • its real 

  • @ledzep22100 That's right and Led Zeppelin is the best.

  • Imagine this...

    Adventurers: OMG! It's bigfoot!

    Chuck: Nope! Chuck Testa.

    Adventurers: Then where you get the skin for your bigfoot...

    Chuck: uhhh, Nope! D:

  • thumbs up if the search for bigc0ck is over and it has been located on chris' body

  • Dodge #473 komodidiot aka reclaimer

  • WTF is this real?

  • @TheTrueTank249

    WTF are you just discovering the existence of this decades old peice of footage?

  • Seymour shut the fuck up, ur mom is Bigfoot lol

  • lol shakey and crappy as shit

  • Mark you're looking for a blurry blob bigfoot video? Narrow it down for us. That's all of them. Tell us your theory on why bigfoot can never be captured clearly on film?

  • I'm looking on YouTube for the second best footage i believe to be realistic. It has a couple of kids playing outside and it's really foggy. I think it's winter time too, i can't remember. Anyway, you can see "something" walking around in the backgroud. Can anyone send me the way to this video?

  • It's clear from watching any tall person; we're all legs. 6ft guy's legs don't even match hers, then there's the top which is even longer than the legs, so how are you going to get it to fit? Let alone operate a suit with this build. As said many times, eminaidiot, it is the anatomy fact preventing this to be a human suited up. Your Tinseltown friends also know very little of BF anatomy, which is why they think it's a suit. Now it's been explained again, which part of reality didn't you get? lol

  • Dodge #441 komododiot aka reclaimer

    You keep dodgin' by babblin'. Now THAT'S spam, lol.

  • Count on, slimeboy, count on. Nobody cares but you about your spam. Anatomy facts denying freak. lol

  • Dodge #435 komodidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson? I wanted a recreation?

    435 dodges and counting, lol.

  • If it's fake why do you even care then? Seems you're very much aware it's no fake and afraid of that, or you'd find better ways to spend time than trolling BF clips. We have a bunch of gullible gits here, who'll believe anything primate experts tell them based on the same tired old no proof excuse. Anthing they can nod their inferior sheep skulls to. Krantz already explained about sagittal crest, it's no male characteristic, it's to do with size alone. When you can't even reach, no pads either.

  • I cant take no more of this idiot...click...bang

  • Just saw a news item where a deer hunter filmed an albino deer. He said he had hunted 30 years and never saw one but he got crystal clear film of the one he did see. Now compare that to a bigfoot where encounters are reported frequently but no one ever gets clear footage or even a clear photo. Hummmm

  • Well said Nasty.

  • Fuckin idiot strikes again , obviously hasnt seen an expert on wildlife who claimed there is enough resources to feed such an animal..bet the midwife gave your old man a dry slap when you was hatched

  • Well said Nasty---these bigfooters have no clue regarding caloric intake. A creature as big as a bigfoot would require 15,000 calories a day just to break even. There's not enough berries in this country to feed thousands of bigfoot day after day who need that many calories.maybe they disquise themselves as humans and drive thru Wendy's?

  • @nastymonsters2 , quit your babbling bullshit , its obvious you have no idea about this subject

  • Nasty - How old are you? Your post are juvenile. I bet the primates that you keep are smarter than you.

  • 800lb creatures running round everywhere living of berries and plants ..lola creature tht size would sit in one spot all day and nite eating just to have the energy to sit and eat berries all day. You trolls just copy and paste the same crap every other geek spouts about BIGFOOT. Millions of yrs of evolution wnd the best you get id s monkey suit... Geta fuckin clue morons. Go get bob g to take one poly test. He wont hes a conman .making a living of geek bigfooters...seek help nerds

  • KKomo and the other geekfooters trolling the same utter shite day after day. Clueless sheep.you know fuck allabout real creatures you just spout the dame crap yr after yr...geeks trolling on their keyboards ...its a suit you blind moronic inbred retarded trolls. Fake padded arse .football shoulder pads clown feet .and a sagital crest on an upright biped. Explain all these evolutionary fuck ups you braindead virgins

  • Exactly reclaimer , buddy if you was here id buy you a beer ha ha..emin , the ugly dyke , probably looks like the wa chang... she needs a life or a good lover..im a good lover , i could turn her back to liking meat ha ha

  • Quite correct Luigi, a bunch of religious freaks that's what they are, afraid of the truth so badly that eminbozo babbles daily about it preaching to others hoping to win them over. Haha, that's what religion's all about and that's what PGF's to her. Guess that's the only proof she's ever presented, must be mad to think it's fake. But her faith persuasion's never happened and never will, most people are smart enough to think for themselves and don't need nerdy eminbozo's brainwashed schooling.

  • I see that slimeytroll2 is barfing her boloney again. Fuck off geezer, we don't care what you think.

  • @nastymonsters2 , ive read your posts and you talk out of your shitter..are you one of emins desciples , and believe in that star trek shit ? fuckin hell dude , have a word

  • KKomo rhe paedo still posting her clueless babble. Get a job you lazy danish turd

  • @eminboztepe , geek ? no i just dont agree with you...son ? you want to be my mummy or something ? ...dodging questions was he ? youre the worst for dodging...why dont you prove us all wrong by having the heart to answer laughinggravys questions...every single one of you has dodged those questions...come on miss expert on pgf..put up or shut up time

  • My god emin , for the love of god , shut that massive hole in your face you idiot..you are boring the be jesus out of everyone..ken peterson ? recreation ? constantly asking reclaimer the same question and counting dodges ? get a life please , no wonder you get laughed at , i actually pity you

  • @Jrld11

    This coming from some geek who believes in....bigfoot. LOL!

    No, son, we laugh at YOU. ;)

  • @Jrld11

    And WE'RE bored with komodidiot's babblin bullshit. He babbles some baseless claim, we call him out on it, and then he always changes the subject.

    Never again. Time for him to put up or shut up.

  • Dodge #415 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson a costume expert? I wanted a recreation?

    Back up your statements you geek.

  • Stop spamming your denial crap eminaidiot, we don't care about your hurt pride, especially I don't when knowing you've been bullshittingly wrong all the time. You geeky troll.

  • Dodge #414 komododiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson is a costume expert? I wanted a recreation?

    Back up your claims you geek.

  • Count on Miss Denier, you're the only one playing. lol

  • Dodge #406 komodidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson? I wanted a recreation?

    406 dodges and counting. lol

  • Your claims, not mine. Never menitoned the dude, he's your name. So you back them up yourself. Total geekess. lol

  • Dodge #402 komododiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson? I wanted a recreation?

    Back up your claims yo geek.

  • I don't know. What does this Ken Peterson have to do with the PGF, another of your excuses for facing facts eh eminaidiot? lol

  • Dodge #372 komodidiot

    Now you're babblin' about anatomy? What does that have to with Ken Peterson? Show me how he is a costume expert.

    Geek.

  • Nah eminaidiot, we see that you still do and refuse to face the anatomy truth. You need to forget about shorty BobbyH, you hear.

  • Dodge #354 komodoidiot.

    Still babblin' about other crap.

    Ken Peterson? I wanted a recreation?

    Back up your claims you geek.

  • Yep, you dodge all the time eminaidiot. You can't back up shit, all you have is your lame rumor mill and your made-up bull. I refer people to what experts have said so they can make up their own minds, you're the most bitter loser ever on YT because in 44 years no one's been able to prove it fake. Can't prove fake what's real in the first place, thus no successful recreations, but eventually even gullible buttheads like you will stfu when more new evidence comes in. You're a geekess alright. lol

  • That's another dodge komodidiot.

    That makes #312.

    Don't make claims you can't back up.

    Geek.

  • Still can't spell, eh. You have no proof it's fake you idiot, there's plenty of evidence proving it's real, that you're jealous and slow thinking we really don't care about.

  • Most thinking people already know this is a real Bigfoot, and I seriously suspect both Musky and no-lifer eminbozo too both do... You want to see fake Bigfoots, go watch Mysterious Monsters (16mm) or Six Million Dollar Man's Bigfoot episodes (35mm). You'll see how the film stock has nothing to do with it, not only do they all (HarryH too) look like what they are (long dudes in longhaired suits) regardless of mm, they move fake too. Patty doesn't, she's in line with witness reports. Dream on...

  • @reclaimerReclaimer no dickhead most ppl know its fake..only clueless trolls like you think bigfoots real...you stupid tard will you every grow up....post your proof ..you have none..

  • @nastymonsters2 You can't know bigfoot is fake. You have faith it is and bash and belittle those who look at all the evidence and come to the only logical and reasonable conclusion. Big foot is real and most likely is a species of proto homonid with very small numbers. It's probably like Neanderthal nearing the end of it's time.

  • @Luigi84289 grow up ..it never existed there is no evidence just dickheads in suits .sooner u accept it the better

  • @nastymonsters2 Prove it is fake. The film is 54 years old and has never been debunked. I don't care about what your personal philosophy is on people that support evidence on the subject disprove it. You obviously don't support science. Probably an insane religious fanatic.

  • @Luigi84289 I was a primate keeper for over twenty yrs hqve been all round the world involved with their care. Hqve attended lecture after lecture .and rhe subject of BIGFOOT gets the same laugh every time. Pgf is classed ad a pathetic con. .your clueless .only native American primate is an 8ft800lb creature lol er no. You habe no argument you have no real proof. All you geeks habe is a faked one min jerky film of a man in a really piss poor suit. and it's nothin more than a suit ..

  • Meldrum in his frutile search of bigfoot lead him recently to Siberria to find the Yeti (because he can't find bigfoot in North America?) when recent reports of the snowman have been reported. Apparently the Kemerovo Government and the new Tashtagol's 'turist Board' made up the hoax story. Meldrum explored the Azassky cave and found all RIGHT foot imprints. LMAO, Meldrum is an idiot for sure!! This sounds familiar when Patterson traveled to Thiland only to been hoxed by the people...hahahaha

  • @MuskyAllen1

    Typical bigfoot mentality. And yet they still quote Meldrum.

    When will these geeks ever learn?

  • @eminboztepe i have almost no faith in mormon book writer meldrum

  • thumbs up if your watching this in 2011 and you believe in Bigfoot

  • fake and hoax

  • Real Bigfoot alright.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer clueless fag....suit alright you tard

  • fake and hoax

  • Ask yourself: who's filming Patterson at the start of the reel? According to Patterson, he'd ridden to the sandbar on horseback w/ camera in saddlebag and pulled it out to shoot when he saw the creature (hence the convenient shaky footage at the start). I've never heard anyone address this pesky fact and it contradicts his story. I first saw this film as kid and have been in love with it ever since. I think it's a creepy piece of footage (even though I don't believe it's "bigfoot" anymore)

  • why did he move his camera up there anyway lol? If they wanted to fake it well, he should have at least waited for that weird noise (0:20) to rotate the camera.

  • i don't comment your boloney hoax theories, eminaidiot. You're so old world it's kinda embarrassing, a major geekess. lol 

  • Wrong, monkeybreath. Banned for spammin'? lol I leave that safely to you geek, if you got banned for spammin' you'de been out of here years ago. Jeez, eminaidiot just can't read or understand rules.

  • You keep asking me something retroll but addressing someone else, not very smart so it's no wonder Sasquatches can outsmart us if they're up against your kind. Patty herself proves without the shadow of a doubt, there's no disguising possible or necessary. It has nothing to do with the filming itself, it's all an anatomical question and the one which skeptics (which you're not one retroller) can't babble around. Proven real anatomy time and time again.

  • Jrld---youre beginning to sound like just another bigfooter---no discussion of the topic just personal attacks. What else is new. You now join the list of those who I'll no longer waste time responding to. Have a nice life.

  • You mean what looks like an accidental pause or a stumble? Well, retro. The point here is that Munns has found it all to be from the same day, from the same time of that day and from the same moment. That is what counts. There is no faking in this footage, what you see is what happened on that day for a few seconds/minutes, same subject.