Nice example of a non objective class of journalism
"You have non evidence of the government behind 9/11,..., considering is not true and you havent prove that it is" 3 contradictions in the same... "question"?
"I dont like the american form policy ... blasfame, sinful... because it didn't" who cares! you are the journalist, you must be an objective subject for god sake!! What kind of rubbish journalism is that? I never see that guy before, and hope that this channel dont looks like the US media
I agree with the guest - His evidence is overwhelming - Americans, particularly conservatives, just cannot "handle the truth" here - The Republic was hijaked by criminals for imperial ambitions - The BBC is the most respected news outlet in the World - It doesn't have to make a profit and is at pains to prove its independence from its funding source - Unlike any other on the globe !
Tucker is arrogant and a puppet of GE/RNC/the US "for profit" media
David Ray Griffin is a complete hack. He dodges questions that debunks his theories, and trust me, his theories have been debunked over and over again.
where who what when how why? the official 911 commision report is the biggest lie- i mean NO steel fram highrise has ever or will ever b brought down (if ever) in such a collapse as seen in 911 due to primarily fire & a little external damage. Not to mention those WTC building were designed to withstand airplane collisions particularly those of 707 which was much heavier than 747. and the WTC was so magnificently designed w/ redundant supporting structures
@Swazi4 Your sound like a 2yr old that just had his mama read to him Dr. Seuss' "Green Eggs and Ham" If you would quit reading the fairy tales and use investigative methods instead of those of condemnation, you would then realize that what Griffin is iterating is pure fact and not theory. If you would take the time and research the evidential facts as Griffin did, maybe, just maybe the tooth fairy will award you with factual information instead of the blatant lies your gov is telling you.
"The whole of British Journalism is low quality". Tucker insults a country and an industry in order to make a point, though his attempt at a fake laugh did make me smile. British press is not owned by General Electric - one of the largest US defence contractors. MSNBC is. Is MSNBC better than any UK press outlet just because its owner manufactures bombs and missiles? How much money did GE make out of the Iraq war?
Typical twoofers same damn lines."Never before in history has a building collapsed due to fire".Um,duh!Maybe because never has a plane crashed into a building at 500 mph.I can't believe Griffin is comparing the plane that crashed into the Empire state building to the planes that crashed into the twin towers.There is no comparison.Not the same size plane,not the same speed,not the same amount of fuel burning.There isn't any comparison.The hijackers are still alive. Yeah right.Where are they?
The 9/11 Commission co-chairs said the"investigation" was set up to fail courtesy of executive director, White House neocon Philip Zelikow. Why? Why did the Commission resort to "drylabbing"? Why did Cheney lie to the Commission? Why was the USAF/NORAD/FAA jet scramble and intercept protocol altered by Cheney in July 2001, changed to require the permission of the Defense Sec. to authorize intercepts, thus allowing the planes time to hit their targets? Why do you hate America?
Cheney was never in charge of NORAD. The planes being intercepted is not an easy task as many of you make it out to be. The answers are there if you bother to look for them.
No. Prior to 9/11, Cheney altered the NORAD scramble protocols, invoked effectively c.70 times a year. As a result of this modification, the def. sec. had to approve intercepts. Cheney (as recounted by Norman Mineta, under oath), was aware of orders not to shoot down any planes: "the order still stands". The original protocols were restored on 9/12/2001 (!) Nobody was fired, courtmartialed, demoted or even reprimanded. The agency heads who screwed up were all promoted. Why do you hate America?
If the job of intercepts are so "difficult", as you claim, remember they have worked flawlesslyl both prior to and after 9/11, but not on the day itself, when 4 commandeered planes, identified on military radar as such, flew for up to 90 minutes over the most closely monitored skies on the planet, without challenge! It was claimed that the transponders were switched off, but this does not cloak the location of a plane! The plane remains visible on radar, but now, glaringly so, without an ID!
According to MIneta's testimony (excised from 9/11 Commission archive!), the plane was visible on radar from at least 50 miles west of the Pentagon (at least 5 minutes). If the orders were "shoot down", then there was ample time to do just that, especially considering the plane passed near multiple AFBs. The plane was NOT shot down.... even the Pentagon's elaborate defense system was not employed. Logic dictates that that the order was *NOT* to shoot down. But that is too awkward to deal with.
The fact that the transponder was turned off it made it difficult to track the plane. Your asking people to pick a needle out of a haystack. On 9/11 only 14 fighter jets were on alert. 14 in the entire lower U.S. Add the fact it's the first time an attack like 911 ever happened, all the chaos and panic, and the rest of the procedure before the shoot down order is given. YOu don't just diall 911 and boom the plane is intercepted. In real life it's alot more difficult than 911 deniers think.
Nail on the head. Jesus even said in the Gospel of David: "Of the man who balances the word of political authority with rationality of God's image, surely he is a dick. To heed him is to swallow Satan's piss-draught."
Oh, so it's British journalism which has 'very low standards'. Interesting. Judging from this video, I would hate to ask what America's journalistic standard is.
I just attended a lecture by Dr. Griffin at San Diego State University and found his lecture concerning his book "9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press" to be quite intriguing and highly provocative. He discussed so many facts+storiesthat coincide negatively to be highly questionable.Luckily,Igot a book and I recommend that anyone seriously interested in actually researching the FACTS that contradict official press releases and etc.,should count on Dr. Griffin's research.
That's all you have to do is ask a truther for proof and they go into childish emotional outbursts, off-topic comments, ban you from their forums and videos and of course never ever.....PROVE what they are saying to be true.
I didn't see Tucker go into Building 7; on the contrary, he quickly evaded that subject.
He seemed much more concerned about passing judgment on Dr. Griffin, but I didn't hear Dr. Griffin passing judgment on Tucker; he limited himself to the facts, like a true professional should.
I completely agree with David Ray Griffin, I think he is in possession of the real truth but I am not offended by Tucker's derision of the BBC and the British media, we should think carefully and remember that Greg Dyke was inexplicably sacked just in time for the atrocities that followed. Several long term newsreaders also left citing an unexplained American presence in the building as their reason to quit. All media is manipulated.
Phoney laugh when he mentions British journalism. Is he really saying the BBC are a low standard news agency. The 9/11 SCOFFERS are forced to fall back on outrageous arguments.
Any theory needs an opposite view, so Tucker is in his full right to speak them out. I wish he will see the videos and face the staggering evidence however.
funny, that's the only time i've ever seen david ray griffin on mainstream tv. probly one of the best speakers among the 9/11 Truth movement i might add. im sure there is a reason they've never had him back. probly the same reason abc, nbc, fox, cnn, and stations alike never reported the alleged terrorists as being alive, as well as many other important facts surrounding the official 9/11 conspiracy theory.
people like tucker are exactly the problem, this whole notion of "the government could NEVER do something like that and it's terrible for you to suggest that." hey i've got bad news, there have been tons of proven inside jobs in world history, and i'm sure the people of those times said the same thing - "no, it couldn't happen."
Nice example of a non objective class of journalism
"You have non evidence of the government behind 9/11,..., considering is not true and you havent prove that it is" 3 contradictions in the same... "question"?
"I dont like the american form policy ... blasfame, sinful... because it didn't" who cares! you are the journalist, you must be an objective subject for god sake!! What kind of rubbish journalism is that? I never see that guy before, and hope that this channel dont looks like the US media
magnitogorshki 1 year ago
can YOUI see the strings connected to tucker ?
xXventanaXx 1 year ago
Is this the great american journalism...?! It must be... just like the one that re-elected Bush....
This Tucker guy is a puppet...
xpms 2 years ago
I agree with the guest - His evidence is overwhelming - Americans, particularly conservatives, just cannot "handle the truth" here - The Republic was hijaked by criminals for imperial ambitions - The BBC is the most respected news outlet in the World - It doesn't have to make a profit and is at pains to prove its independence from its funding source - Unlike any other on the globe !
Tucker is arrogant and a puppet of GE/RNC/the US "for profit" media
garrettroche 2 years ago
David Ray Griffin is a complete hack. He dodges questions that debunks his theories, and trust me, his theories have been debunked over and over again.
Swazi4 2 years ago
where who what when how why? the official 911 commision report is the biggest lie- i mean NO steel fram highrise has ever or will ever b brought down (if ever) in such a collapse as seen in 911 due to primarily fire & a little external damage. Not to mention those WTC building were designed to withstand airplane collisions particularly those of 707 which was much heavier than 747. and the WTC was so magnificently designed w/ redundant supporting structures
imbrd 2 years ago
I find it hard to believe that anyone with a minimum of common sense and education could ever believe in anything stated in the 911 Report.
Do you really think that Griffin is a fraud?
What 's your opinion about that Tucker character?
xpms 2 years ago
@Swazi4 Your sound like a 2yr old that just had his mama read to him Dr. Seuss' "Green Eggs and Ham" If you would quit reading the fairy tales and use investigative methods instead of those of condemnation, you would then realize that what Griffin is iterating is pure fact and not theory. If you would take the time and research the evidential facts as Griffin did, maybe, just maybe the tooth fairy will award you with factual information instead of the blatant lies your gov is telling you.
rsharif100 2 months ago
"The whole of British Journalism is low quality". Tucker insults a country and an industry in order to make a point, though his attempt at a fake laugh did make me smile. British press is not owned by General Electric - one of the largest US defence contractors. MSNBC is. Is MSNBC better than any UK press outlet just because its owner manufactures bombs and missiles? How much money did GE make out of the Iraq war?
unimoggie 3 years ago
Typical twoofers same damn lines."Never before in history has a building collapsed due to fire".Um,duh!Maybe because never has a plane crashed into a building at 500 mph.I can't believe Griffin is comparing the plane that crashed into the Empire state building to the planes that crashed into the twin towers.There is no comparison.Not the same size plane,not the same speed,not the same amount of fuel burning.There isn't any comparison.The hijackers are still alive. Yeah right.Where are they?
AmericasFan 3 years ago
The 9/11 Commission co-chairs said the"investigation" was set up to fail courtesy of executive director, White House neocon Philip Zelikow. Why? Why did the Commission resort to "drylabbing"? Why did Cheney lie to the Commission? Why was the USAF/NORAD/FAA jet scramble and intercept protocol altered by Cheney in July 2001, changed to require the permission of the Defense Sec. to authorize intercepts, thus allowing the planes time to hit their targets? Why do you hate America?
bloggulator 2 years ago
Cheney was never in charge of NORAD. The planes being intercepted is not an easy task as many of you make it out to be. The answers are there if you bother to look for them.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
No. Prior to 9/11, Cheney altered the NORAD scramble protocols, invoked effectively c.70 times a year. As a result of this modification, the def. sec. had to approve intercepts. Cheney (as recounted by Norman Mineta, under oath), was aware of orders not to shoot down any planes: "the order still stands". The original protocols were restored on 9/12/2001 (!) Nobody was fired, courtmartialed, demoted or even reprimanded. The agency heads who screwed up were all promoted. Why do you hate America?
bloggulator 2 years ago
If the job of intercepts are so "difficult", as you claim, remember they have worked flawlesslyl both prior to and after 9/11, but not on the day itself, when 4 commandeered planes, identified on military radar as such, flew for up to 90 minutes over the most closely monitored skies on the planet, without challenge! It was claimed that the transponders were switched off, but this does not cloak the location of a plane! The plane remains visible on radar, but now, glaringly so, without an ID!
bloggulator 2 years ago
If you actually listened to the entire testimony you would know that the event in question was a shoot down order not the other way around.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
According to MIneta's testimony (excised from 9/11 Commission archive!), the plane was visible on radar from at least 50 miles west of the Pentagon (at least 5 minutes). If the orders were "shoot down", then there was ample time to do just that, especially considering the plane passed near multiple AFBs. The plane was NOT shot down.... even the Pentagon's elaborate defense system was not employed. Logic dictates that that the order was *NOT* to shoot down. But that is too awkward to deal with.
bloggulator 2 years ago
The fact that the transponder was turned off it made it difficult to track the plane. Your asking people to pick a needle out of a haystack. On 9/11 only 14 fighter jets were on alert. 14 in the entire lower U.S. Add the fact it's the first time an attack like 911 ever happened, all the chaos and panic, and the rest of the procedure before the shoot down order is given. YOu don't just diall 911 and boom the plane is intercepted. In real life it's alot more difficult than 911 deniers think.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
Wow, that tucker bloke is a collosal penis. Is he about 10 years old too?
HeavyPlant70 3 years ago
"BLASPHEMOUS!!!!"
Nail on the head. Jesus even said in the Gospel of David: "Of the man who balances the word of political authority with rationality of God's image, surely he is a dick. To heed him is to swallow Satan's piss-draught."
thefacelesssock 3 years ago
Griffin is a yo-yo.
agentpolsky 3 years ago
Oh, so it's British journalism which has 'very low standards'. Interesting. Judging from this video, I would hate to ask what America's journalistic standard is.
kylerostock 3 years ago
I just attended a lecture by Dr. Griffin at San Diego State University and found his lecture concerning his book "9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press" to be quite intriguing and highly provocative. He discussed so many facts+storiesthat coincide negatively to be highly questionable.Luckily,Igot a book and I recommend that anyone seriously interested in actually researching the FACTS that contradict official press releases and etc.,should count on Dr. Griffin's research.
HiThere23 3 years ago 3
haha gogo tucker! "they do and that's sad."
Maggax2H 3 years ago
Tucker PWND Griffin.
You haven't proven it! LOL!!!!
That's all you have to do is ask a truther for proof and they go into childish emotional outbursts, off-topic comments, ban you from their forums and videos and of course never ever.....PROVE what they are saying to be true.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
I didn't see Tucker go into Building 7; on the contrary, he quickly evaded that subject.
He seemed much more concerned about passing judgment on Dr. Griffin, but I didn't hear Dr. Griffin passing judgment on Tucker; he limited himself to the facts, like a true professional should.
daviDMCelis 3 years ago
The facts?
You mean Griffin, an expert in Theology pretending he's an expert in engineering.
That's as good as "professionals" on the topic that you get in the 911 Truther movement.
Theologists pretending they are engineers.
Steven Jones is a physicist but also believes he proved that god visited the United States in the early part of millenium.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
I completely agree with David Ray Griffin, I think he is in possession of the real truth but I am not offended by Tucker's derision of the BBC and the British media, we should think carefully and remember that Greg Dyke was inexplicably sacked just in time for the atrocities that followed. Several long term newsreaders also left citing an unexplained American presence in the building as their reason to quit. All media is manipulated.
kaferere 3 years ago 2
Phoney laugh when he mentions British journalism. Is he really saying the BBC are a low standard news agency. The 9/11 SCOFFERS are forced to fall back on outrageous arguments.
SpudXXXX 3 years ago 2
Tucker is a piece of shit.
tlkshowhst 4 years ago 2
Any theory needs an opposite view, so Tucker is in his full right to speak them out. I wish he will see the videos and face the staggering evidence however.
keramikk 4 years ago 2
funny, that's the only time i've ever seen david ray griffin on mainstream tv. probly one of the best speakers among the 9/11 Truth movement i might add. im sure there is a reason they've never had him back. probly the same reason abc, nbc, fox, cnn, and stations alike never reported the alleged terrorists as being alive, as well as many other important facts surrounding the official 9/11 conspiracy theory.
thatzdude 4 years ago 2
who is this "tucker"?!? how dare he speaking to david ray griffin like that?!?
LocoPengPeng 4 years ago 7
What a terrible medium TV is for discussing anything.
heituzi 4 years ago 3
people like tucker are exactly the problem, this whole notion of "the government could NEVER do something like that and it's terrible for you to suggest that." hey i've got bad news, there have been tons of proven inside jobs in world history, and i'm sure the people of those times said the same thing - "no, it couldn't happen."
larsplankin 4 years ago 2
Tucker Carlson comes of as an uneducated and non objective twit. Griffin should be applauded for his patience.
FellowTraveler06 4 years ago 7
go get him. anybody with any soul can see the guy knows what hes talking about...and i dont mean that spoiled prep school guy tucker.
downwithconservos 4 years ago 5
tucker should be beaten up, hung from a tree, shot at, and run over by a buck
BJJMTF 4 years ago 2