Such poise and sexiness. I have been shadowing Lise since her wee early days as an ultra-hot model for Pampers. Not only did she swallow everything that came at her, she chewed up and swallowed her credit cards whilst high on Kenneth Hechtman's megadose of crack in the Frosh dorm at Columbia. Plus she was lesbian! Don't misunderstand - she was a great sucker for pussy, but Wikipedia will suffer greatly for her well-rounded
Such poise and sexiness. I have been shadowing Lise since her wee early days as an ultra-hot model for Pampers. Not only did she swallow everything that came at her, she chewed up and swallowed her credit cards whilst high on Kenneth Hechtman's megadose of crack in the Frosh dorm at Columbia. Plus she was lesbian!
According to Wikipedia "the necklace she is wearing is made from melted down gold teeth stolen from jews murdered in the holocaust" although you can't believe everything you read there
I swear i hate this bitch with a fucking passion. She blocked me for a full 2 years all because I had sent her an angry response for deleting MY user page. She said it was "inappropriate" for the site. Its MY user page. Not yours! MINE you egotistical bitch.
Don't say "uhh" in an interview. It makes you sound stupid. But.. I think i would feel cool if i were an administrator in wiki (I would take advantage of my power like mall security). Can someone please make me an adminstrator in wiki so I can bring back to life fucking shit up in wikipedia like it was seemingly meant to be in the beginning?
Fuck wikipedia. I thought i was able to go and fuck shit up without some douche Fuhghettaboutit of wikipedia using his or her almighty powers of blocking me. I'm pretty sure no one will ever take wikipedia seriously enough to actually use its content as a source of intelligent information.
But congrats to whoever is getting paid by wikipedia for their time and efforts of keeping wiki accurate and vandil free. ....Fuck that. Can someone please come up with a wiki2.0 that people can still fuck with?? Thats what made it so fuckawesome.. I don't think to many people really care about the info in wiki... they just want to laugh at the funny bullshit people edit.
How many people did she ban today just because she didnt like what they wrote??? Not based on WIKI rules but on own personal bias, which is how most WIKI admins operate. Complain about their bias and be perma banned, because WIKI doesnt take criticism! WIKI is for WIKI it isnt for its users.
This is the same woman who's been trying to remove all references to Matt Sanchez's prostitution career from Wikipedia. To put it gently, I had no idea she was such an ugly cunt.
Google "Durova a.k.a. Lise Diane Broer " for a encyclopediadramatica page on this Durova and how she was sacked in disgrace for lying. She pledged "allegiance to the forces of infernal darkness" and dressed as a man to get into the military. She has a Joan of Arc fetish. Oh, just read that page, it shows the sort of sick people that are burrowing and spinning away from the safety of their stank little computers. She is uglier on the inside than on the outside, believe me.
WHO is this person gfh200 who keeps posting that Lise Broer has a genius IQ? Lise Broer?
I *sincerely doubt* Lise has a genius IQ. But if she does, it's vastly hindered by her odd behavior and poor social skills. And she's NOT a nice person.
@Endives4ever...wouldn't you like to know? Let's just say that I know for a fact that she is a very nice person and for a fact that she not only has a genius IQ but is one of the most intelligent people on earth... She's quite prolific actually. All of you guys out there trolling after her really need to check yourselves and question why it is you have such an obsession with a person you have never met and know nothing about.
Such poise and sexiness. I have been shadowing Lise since her wee early days as an ultra-hot model for Pampers. Not only did she swallow everything that came at her, she chewed up and swallowed her credit cards whilst high on Kenneth Hechtman's megadose of crack in the Frosh dorm at Columbia. Plus she was lesbian! Don't misunderstand - she was a great sucker for pussy, but Wikipedia will suffer greatly for her well-rounded
Fucking hate that bullshit website. It may be nice looking at each page and getting information but editing it is hell because of the bullshit admins like her
Yikes! I so know what you're talking about. I learned that shit a long time ago. Then you have pricks who hold grudges because you disagreed with them following you around the site and trying to cause trouble (user: Ckatz) is a good example of that. User Ckatz doesn't get into any trouble tho because his edit warring is hidden within a sea of reversions and his thrown off a lot of people because of it and even managed to become an admin. The behavior at that site is just absolutely fucked up!
Kohs,it probably wasn't a good idea to antagonize the Big Boss Man. It must truly suck to know how many people are doing exactly what you planned to do and are getting away with it because they have the good sense to keep it on the down low. Also you are entitled to use semantics all day long to attempt to create favorable impressions for your audience but to then turn around and suggest that anyone who claims that you mislead has committed legal wrongdoing is out of bounds on every level.
Kohs, I did read the AP article about your idea. The community disagreement with the boss revolved around your wish to not just post content on your own website after the intial block of your editing priveleges, but to post your articles about your clients on your user page inside Wikipedia. Seriously Kohs, are we really supposed to believe that people aren't paying you $49-$99 to do nothing but put their company in the best possible light while possibly omitting less flattering information?
Kohs, You tried the GDFL route on your own website and attempted to get the content scraped only after your account was initially blocked. As for whether the content you wanted to post was encyclopedic or promotional is semantical and all a matter of perspective, and unfortunately for you, it's not your perspective that counts. Also what ever made you think that because they'd paid small sums of money to those who wrote articles about esoteric subjects they would ratify your business idea?
She first jumped in an article I was editing among other editors, [[Joan of Arc]]. She chased them away, and I left evidence on my page about how she wrote WP:DE to speciffically ban certain people, not by action by name -- those being the editors that worked on Joan of Arc. Worst, she harassed my daughter, I posted proof on my talk page.
It seems that some of you out there believe that you have some sort of inalienable right to post content on another person's website. The owner of the site has every right to determine what content will appear. If you want to publish content on the web, you have every right to create your own website. Lise has every right to ax undesireable content and I assure you she is more that qualified to do so. Her genius IQ and educational background put her on a level very few can equal.
I'm positive that none of you people making nasty comments about Lise know anything about her personally. To start with she has a genius IQ. She has prolific abilities that most people couldn't even begin to comprehend. In addition she has many other abilities and personal qualities which might surprise some of you. As for those of you who have tried to use Wikipedia for shameless self promotion or for publishing content with no basis for rational belief, you deserve to get axed.
Unfortunately, she's spent most of her post-admin period behaving as if she's still an administrator. And she is acting as if this was a one-off venture. It wasnt.
I have donated $50 to Wikipedia every year for the past 3 years.
I will no longer give a dime to Wikipedia because, in part, of this awful person. I would prefer to see Wikipedia run into the ground than donate a penny to it.
This person (and others like her) have ruined a Really Good Thing.
She's probably ok in person. On Wikipedia, she's vicious, paranoid and has a habit of accusing people irrationally. She's delighted in people's public humiliation. That's not a nice person. No matter how charming she is in on camera.
She made a bad block in a very public manner. And yes, that opened questions about her methods. But I think she hasn't quite deserved the level of criticism she's received.
That doesn't mean I want her to return to admin status in the immediate future. But, on the whole, I think she's an editor worthwhile.
If people are really calling Durova out, it makes sense. She's behaved like a schoolyard bully. Dont be fooled by the gentle schoolmarm act. She's left blood of innocents all over the wiki, and all over the web. She should have been kicked off.
I'd still like to know how she gets away with wearing that outfit to a professional conference. What does she wear to job interviews, a mohair sweater?
I agree that she is not a very nice person; rashly bans good editors without just cause and against consensus. Fortunately, in my case her actions were overturned.
A face gets put to the nastiness. Durova has libeled me, Kohs (above) and many other people online. The fact that she's giving advice to SEOs in heresy. She was written about in the article "Is Wikipedia Corrupt". Do a quick Google.
You should be careful about throwing around legal terms the require legal judgement and not your own personal opinion. Mr. Kohs was attempting to get paid for writing "promotional advertising" content on Wikipedia. He was told this violated the rules. He persisted, and was rightfully axed. Getting axed for violating rules does not constitute libel. I took the liberty of doing the quick "google" and turned up a site with nothing but random ravings against Lise who I'm sure you know nothing about.
gfh150, you don't know what you're talking about. MyWikiBiz was authoring encyclopedic GFDL content about corporations and products, then posting said content on OUR OWN DAMN WEBSITE. It wasn't "promotional advertising", and it wasn't "on Wikipedia". In fact, we were operating under a business model that Jimmy Wales himself prescribed. The reason I was "axed" is because I had the nerve to point out to Jimbo that his community disagreed with his solution as being best.
Such poise and sexiness. I have been shadowing Lise since her wee early days as an ultra-hot model for Pampers. Not only did she swallow everything that came at her, she chewed up and swallowed her credit cards whilst high on Kenneth Hechtman's megadose of crack in the Frosh dorm at Columbia. Plus she was lesbian! Don't misunderstand - she was a great sucker for pussy, but Wikipedia will suffer greatly for her well-rounded
holographic-glasses contribution.
HauteBitchez 10 months ago
Such poise and sexiness. I have been shadowing Lise since her wee early days as an ultra-hot model for Pampers. Not only did she swallow everything that came at her, she chewed up and swallowed her credit cards whilst high on Kenneth Hechtman's megadose of crack in the Frosh dorm at Columbia. Plus she was lesbian!
HauteBitchez 10 months ago
omg I look JUST like her. omg omg omg
TreasureNetCrackpot 1 year ago
@EarWax0 ...
BigBottleLightInc 1 year ago
According to Wikipedia "the necklace she is wearing is made from melted down gold teeth stolen from jews murdered in the holocaust" although you can't believe everything you read there
ITCEVP 1 year ago
I swear i hate this bitch with a fucking passion. She blocked me for a full 2 years all because I had sent her an angry response for deleting MY user page. She said it was "inappropriate" for the site. Its MY user page. Not yours! MINE you egotistical bitch.
MileyIsASlut545654 1 year ago
Don't say "uhh" in an interview. It makes you sound stupid. But.. I think i would feel cool if i were an administrator in wiki (I would take advantage of my power like mall security). Can someone please make me an adminstrator in wiki so I can bring back to life fucking shit up in wikipedia like it was seemingly meant to be in the beginning?
pyrosk8ur123 1 year ago
Fuck wikipedia. I thought i was able to go and fuck shit up without some douche Fuhghettaboutit of wikipedia using his or her almighty powers of blocking me. I'm pretty sure no one will ever take wikipedia seriously enough to actually use its content as a source of intelligent information.
pyrosk8ur123 1 year ago 6
But congrats to whoever is getting paid by wikipedia for their time and efforts of keeping wiki accurate and vandil free. ....Fuck that. Can someone please come up with a wiki2.0 that people can still fuck with?? Thats what made it so fuckawesome.. I don't think to many people really care about the info in wiki... they just want to laugh at the funny bullshit people edit.
pyrosk8ur123 1 year ago
How many people did she ban today just because she didnt like what they wrote??? Not based on WIKI rules but on own personal bias, which is how most WIKI admins operate. Complain about their bias and be perma banned, because WIKI doesnt take criticism! WIKI is for WIKI it isnt for its users.
truthseekers666 1 year ago
Nerd alert
dizzyntara 2 years ago
They are all a bunch of sad people, all old & nothing better to do, YOU FUCKING CUNTS, POSH TWATS!!!
No one cares about this ugly ass bitch!!!
BishopCR7 2 years ago
This is the same woman who's been trying to remove all references to Matt Sanchez's prostitution career from Wikipedia. To put it gently, I had no idea she was such an ugly cunt.
JimAubrey 2 years ago
Write to wiki they will help you. Screw that, you tell them what your problem is they find 100 ways to ban you on the spot.
truthseekers666 1 year ago
Google "Durova a.k.a. Lise Diane Broer " for a encyclopediadramatica page on this Durova and how she was sacked in disgrace for lying. She pledged "allegiance to the forces of infernal darkness" and dressed as a man to get into the military. She has a Joan of Arc fetish. Oh, just read that page, it shows the sort of sick people that are burrowing and spinning away from the safety of their stank little computers. She is uglier on the inside than on the outside, believe me.
guydecervens 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I hate this bitch in the vid.
RaymanRhyanna2190 2 years ago
@RaymanRhyanna2190 this aint spam
newcomer9747 1 year ago
There's this Prick on Uncyc called "Meth" and I swear I want to jump through the fucking computer screen and beat the shit outta that son of a bitch.
He's one of the reasons I left that Bullshit site. >:(
RaymanRhyanna2190 2 years ago
WHO is this person gfh200 who keeps posting that Lise Broer has a genius IQ? Lise Broer?
I *sincerely doubt* Lise has a genius IQ. But if she does, it's vastly hindered by her odd behavior and poor social skills. And she's NOT a nice person.
Endives4ever 2 years ago
Comment removed
gfh200 1 year ago
Comment removed
gfh200 1 year ago
@Endives4ever...wouldn't you like to know? Let's just say that I know for a fact that she is a very nice person and for a fact that she not only has a genius IQ but is one of the most intelligent people on earth... She's quite prolific actually. All of you guys out there trolling after her really need to check yourselves and question why it is you have such an obsession with a person you have never met and know nothing about.
gfh200 1 year ago 2
Such poise and sexiness. I have been shadowing Lise since her wee early days as an ultra-hot model for Pampers. Not only did she swallow everything that came at her, she chewed up and swallowed her credit cards whilst high on Kenneth Hechtman's megadose of crack in the Frosh dorm at Columbia. Plus she was lesbian! Don't misunderstand - she was a great sucker for pussy, but Wikipedia will suffer greatly for her well-rounded
holographic-glasses contribution. @gfh200
HauteBitchez 10 months ago
what a sad creature
kkkaldav 2 years ago
I dont give a shit.
If she has the world's biggest IQ.
All i know, she is full of B.S....
viciousdreamz 3 years ago
Fucking hate that bullshit website. It may be nice looking at each page and getting information but editing it is hell because of the bullshit admins like her
Tonetare 3 years ago
editing controversial pages is always hell, i don't recommend doing that...
Raffaello9 3 years ago
Yikes! I so know what you're talking about. I learned that shit a long time ago. Then you have pricks who hold grudges because you disagreed with them following you around the site and trying to cause trouble (user: Ckatz) is a good example of that. User Ckatz doesn't get into any trouble tho because his edit warring is hidden within a sea of reversions and his thrown off a lot of people because of it and even managed to become an admin. The behavior at that site is just absolutely fucked up!
Tonetare 3 years ago
butt ugly bitch
Tonetare 3 years ago
Matt Sanchez scandal?
I never knew those two were having a relationship.
To be fair to her, I really reckon she should chuck those glasses and get her hair done.
wikipedianssux 3 years ago 4
Isn't she involved with the whole Matt Sanchez scandal?
cryan71 3 years ago
Whoah whoah, back up here padre. Scandal? Matt Sanchez? SHE!?
You're telling me thats a fucking woman!?!?
Funkdefence 3 years ago
holy sheckler! how old is this dinosaur?
mciem 3 years ago
I fear she will breed. To whom I don't know. Heaven help the human race.
wikipedianssux 3 years ago
Kohs,it probably wasn't a good idea to antagonize the Big Boss Man. It must truly suck to know how many people are doing exactly what you planned to do and are getting away with it because they have the good sense to keep it on the down low. Also you are entitled to use semantics all day long to attempt to create favorable impressions for your audience but to then turn around and suggest that anyone who claims that you mislead has committed legal wrongdoing is out of bounds on every level.
gfh200 3 years ago
Kohs, I did read the AP article about your idea. The community disagreement with the boss revolved around your wish to not just post content on your own website after the intial block of your editing priveleges, but to post your articles about your clients on your user page inside Wikipedia. Seriously Kohs, are we really supposed to believe that people aren't paying you $49-$99 to do nothing but put their company in the best possible light while possibly omitting less flattering information?
gfh200 3 years ago
Kohs, You tried the GDFL route on your own website and attempted to get the content scraped only after your account was initially blocked. As for whether the content you wanted to post was encyclopedic or promotional is semantical and all a matter of perspective, and unfortunately for you, it's not your perspective that counts. Also what ever made you think that because they'd paid small sums of money to those who wrote articles about esoteric subjects they would ratify your business idea?
gfh200 3 years ago
She first jumped in an article I was editing among other editors, [[Joan of Arc]]. She chased them away, and I left evidence on my page about how she wrote WP:DE to speciffically ban certain people, not by action by name -- those being the editors that worked on Joan of Arc. Worst, she harassed my daughter, I posted proof on my talk page.
dzonatas 3 years ago 2
It seems that some of you out there believe that you have some sort of inalienable right to post content on another person's website. The owner of the site has every right to determine what content will appear. If you want to publish content on the web, you have every right to create your own website. Lise has every right to ax undesireable content and I assure you she is more that qualified to do so. Her genius IQ and educational background put her on a level very few can equal.
gfh150 4 years ago
I'm positive that none of you people making nasty comments about Lise know anything about her personally. To start with she has a genius IQ. She has prolific abilities that most people couldn't even begin to comprehend. In addition she has many other abilities and personal qualities which might surprise some of you. As for those of you who have tried to use Wikipedia for shameless self promotion or for publishing content with no basis for rational belief, you deserve to get axed.
gfh150 4 years ago
Just wanted to wish Lise a Happy New Year and hope that all is well.
rexanwill 4 years ago
admins should undergo a psych test. I wonder what she would turn up that she hasnt yet shown in her online behaviour
beverins 4 years ago 3
now she can spend more time editing articles in a serious manner, instead of playing Sherlock Holmes at the administrators' noticeboard ;)
Raffaello9 4 years ago 3
Unfortunately, she's spent most of her post-admin period behaving as if she's still an administrator. And she is acting as if this was a one-off venture. It wasnt.
Notacow2 4 years ago
I have donated $50 to Wikipedia every year for the past 3 years.
I will no longer give a dime to Wikipedia because, in part, of this awful person. I would prefer to see Wikipedia run into the ground than donate a penny to it.
This person (and others like her) have ruined a Really Good Thing.
caffeine1 4 years ago 6
I went to college with her: she is a nice person. She tended to bring much enthusiasm to things that interested her.
ThumperRaw 4 years ago
She's probably ok in person. On Wikipedia, she's vicious, paranoid and has a habit of accusing people irrationally. She's delighted in people's public humiliation. That's not a nice person. No matter how charming she is in on camera.
Notacow2 4 years ago
I thought she was a very nice person.
ackmnmn 4 years ago
Most people think she's a nice person. They realize otherwise once she's gutted them like a fish, when they weren't looking.
Notacow2 4 years ago 2
She made a bad block in a very public manner. And yes, that opened questions about her methods. But I think she hasn't quite deserved the level of criticism she's received.
That doesn't mean I want her to return to admin status in the immediate future. But, on the whole, I think she's an editor worthwhile.
rawfulralph 4 years ago
I invite Lisa to join this discussion. I'm getting emails in private REALLY calling Durova out.
ackmnmn 4 years ago
If people are really calling Durova out, it makes sense. She's behaved like a schoolyard bully. Dont be fooled by the gentle schoolmarm act. She's left blood of innocents all over the wiki, and all over the web. She should have been kicked off.
Notacow2 4 years ago
She seems sweet.
DURound 4 years ago
I heard Hitler's dog thought he was sweet too. :/
Notacow2 4 years ago
I'd still like to know how she gets away with wearing that outfit to a professional conference. What does she wear to job interviews, a mohair sweater?
MisterSomey 4 years ago
I'm the SEO who did the interview with Durova. I'd like to hear from more folks who know here.
aimClear
ackmnmn 4 years ago
Are you planning on inviting her to future SEO meetings?
Notacow2 4 years ago
I agree that she is not a very nice person; rashly bans good editors without just cause and against consensus. Fortunately, in my case her actions were overturned.
giovanni9999 4 years ago 2
A face gets put to the nastiness. Durova has libeled me, Kohs (above) and many other people online. The fact that she's giving advice to SEOs in heresy. She was written about in the article "Is Wikipedia Corrupt". Do a quick Google.
libelledonwiki 4 years ago 2
You should be careful about throwing around legal terms the require legal judgement and not your own personal opinion. Mr. Kohs was attempting to get paid for writing "promotional advertising" content on Wikipedia. He was told this violated the rules. He persisted, and was rightfully axed. Getting axed for violating rules does not constitute libel. I took the liberty of doing the quick "google" and turned up a site with nothing but random ravings against Lise who I'm sure you know nothing about.
gfh150 4 years ago
gfh150, you don't know what you're talking about. MyWikiBiz was authoring encyclopedic GFDL content about corporations and products, then posting said content on OUR OWN DAMN WEBSITE. It wasn't "promotional advertising", and it wasn't "on Wikipedia". In fact, we were operating under a business model that Jimmy Wales himself prescribed. The reason I was "axed" is because I had the nerve to point out to Jimbo that his community disagreed with his solution as being best.
thekohser 3 years ago
Durova reveals herself! Yay.
thekohser 4 years ago