Anyway, I'm still skeptical. Your memorization time is comparable to mine, and yet speed blindfold involves memorizing a lot more information. Even if you just guessed on OLL, I find it very difficult to believe that you planned out your entire solution AND traced every piece through every move in only 38 seconds.
When you say this was your 8th try, was it your 8th try on this solve? In that case, there was pre-memorization involved; you should be honest in your video description.
1.The solve was actually my 1st successful solve in 8 tries(all scrambled randomly)
2.Normally while solving, you would look for step (memorize).look for step 2(memorize 1&2).Then step 1(memorize 1,2&3)and so on.
Yes accurate.Yes consistent.Yes hard
What i did was memorize the whole solve without going back(like1.then 2.then 3 without thinking "what was 1 again?" I call it the "Come What May Method"(joke)
High DNF average. High tendency to be distracted. Need God's help..but Yes, faster
I'm surprised you don't do "conventional" BLD. It's a lot less to memorize, and if you can memorize for speed BLD as fast as this, regular BLD memo should be cake for you.
Actually i didn't do the conventional method coz i just learned it lately. I also have a friend who can do this and he's the one who thought me me how. I was not until recently that I discovered about the other methods.
Being a cake: (Ex. not blindfold solving)
If my method was Rux and a guy doing Friedrich came to me and say if you can do Rux that fast, Fiedrich would be a cake for you.
Hmm. No. Maybe if I study, practice, and practice more with it I can. But then i would forget my old method
Well, obviously you'd need practice. But I'm just talking about the amount of information you'd need to memorize. If you can do speed blindfold memo in under a minute, I'm curious as to how fast you'd be able to do regular blindfold memo.
Hmmm. I'll maybe I'll try. Coz I'm kinda scared to do new methods. Like when i did Friedrich. Now I don't know how to do the last part of the basic method. Lols. I'm scared that that might happen when i try the conventional. Remember?my memorization isn't that good. Specially the long term. hmmm.. Maybe im better at short terms so i can do this (Just talking to myself again) Anyway, ill try to do a conventional video I guess I guess after I make another video on Friedrich.
When I said 8th try, It means that my first to seventh tries was a failure.The 8th is what's in the video. I know it sucks to DNF 7 consecutive times just because I didnt' focused on my memorization and just thought of speed, but I knew it would be awesome to if i could get one fast solve on video.Well, i did
All tries was randomly scrambled it means 8 individual cases. 1/8 success. And i still think it was luck.
As much as I respect you for your skills,gave gratitude for your comments, and do my best to answer all your questions even though my English grammar isn't that good, I somehow don't like this line
"you should be honest in your video
description. "
Is there any reason for me to think about it the wrong way ma'am?
How consistent are you (in accuracy and time)? If I scrambled a cube for you right now, would you be able to memo+execute it in a minute (or let's make it fair and say 2 minutes) using this method every time?
Q#1: Consistency in accuracy and time?I guess I'm not that consistent ma'am.If you you would scramble he cube and let me solve it SBF(as you call it ma'am), and my MAJOR goal would be to solve it fast.(like in the video) The probability would be at least 1 successful solve in maybe 8 to 10 tries.(that's by experience in making this video).
You are obviously using a speedsolve method rather than a conventional blindfold method. While blindfold solving using a speed method like Fridrich is possible (it's known as speed blindfold) the best speed blindfolders take well over 5-10 minutes to memorize the cube.
Please explain yourself. My guess is you used a pre-memorized scramble (scrambled in front of the camera). Otherwise, I'd appreciate an explanation of your method. Can you do conventional blindfold?
Thanks for the comment ssrc.You made a very decent, honest question so i guess you deserve a thank you for your comment.
Well, I didn't knew until now that other people uses the Friedrich Method as a basis for speed BF solving. And i thought I was unique.lols.
For your question:
1. No I can't to the conventional. But I know the theory. i can only do the corner orientation and the corner permutation but my memory sucks at the edges. But I'm still trying to learn them coz their more accurate.
1. the truth is this wasn't my first try. This was actually my 8th. So yeah I don't concentrate on my solved average. I just did it for my video.I just wanted to think fast and just try again if i fail. That's why it only took me 38 sec to do it. Coz some of it are just lucky guesses(Like the OLL)
2. Easy cross.The first 2 F2L was easy. I just need to insert them. So i just focused on the 2nd and third F2L, The PLL then guessed the OLL. whoalla!! lucky 1 min. solve.
thats super cooL!
i dnt care for rubix...but,,,i luv asukal,.haha,.taeh,.okei sa trip den ugh,.*^_^*take it easy,.
esiouLcm 2 years ago
Anyway, I'm still skeptical. Your memorization time is comparable to mine, and yet speed blindfold involves memorizing a lot more information. Even if you just guessed on OLL, I find it very difficult to believe that you planned out your entire solution AND traced every piece through every move in only 38 seconds.
When you say this was your 8th try, was it your 8th try on this solve? In that case, there was pre-memorization involved; you should be honest in your video description.
ssrc 3 years ago
1.The solve was actually my 1st successful solve in 8 tries(all scrambled randomly)
2.Normally while solving, you would look for step (memorize).look for step 2(memorize 1&2).Then step 1(memorize 1,2&3)and so on.
Yes accurate.Yes consistent.Yes hard
What i did was memorize the whole solve without going back(like1.then 2.then 3 without thinking "what was 1 again?" I call it the "Come What May Method"(joke)
High DNF average. High tendency to be distracted. Need God's help..but Yes, faster
pulangasukal 3 years ago
I'm surprised you don't do "conventional" BLD. It's a lot less to memorize, and if you can memorize for speed BLD as fast as this, regular BLD memo should be cake for you.
ssrc 3 years ago
Actually i didn't do the conventional method coz i just learned it lately. I also have a friend who can do this and he's the one who thought me me how. I was not until recently that I discovered about the other methods.
Being a cake: (Ex. not blindfold solving)
If my method was Rux and a guy doing Friedrich came to me and say if you can do Rux that fast, Fiedrich would be a cake for you.
Hmm. No. Maybe if I study, practice, and practice more with it I can. But then i would forget my old method
pulangasukal 3 years ago
Well, obviously you'd need practice. But I'm just talking about the amount of information you'd need to memorize. If you can do speed blindfold memo in under a minute, I'm curious as to how fast you'd be able to do regular blindfold memo.
ssrc 3 years ago
Hmmm. I'll maybe I'll try. Coz I'm kinda scared to do new methods. Like when i did Friedrich. Now I don't know how to do the last part of the basic method. Lols. I'm scared that that might happen when i try the conventional. Remember?my memorization isn't that good. Specially the long term. hmmm.. Maybe im better at short terms so i can do this (Just talking to myself again) Anyway, ill try to do a conventional video I guess I guess after I make another video on Friedrich.
pulangasukal 3 years ago
When I said 8th try, It means that my first to seventh tries was a failure.The 8th is what's in the video. I know it sucks to DNF 7 consecutive times just because I didnt' focused on my memorization and just thought of speed, but I knew it would be awesome to if i could get one fast solve on video.Well, i did
All tries was randomly scrambled it means 8 individual cases. 1/8 success. And i still think it was luck.
pulangasukal 3 years ago
As much as I respect you for your skills,gave gratitude for your comments, and do my best to answer all your questions even though my English grammar isn't that good, I somehow don't like this line
"you should be honest in your video
description. "
Is there any reason for me to think about it the wrong way ma'am?
pulangasukal 3 years ago
How consistent are you (in accuracy and time)? If I scrambled a cube for you right now, would you be able to memo+execute it in a minute (or let's make it fair and say 2 minutes) using this method every time?
ssrc 3 years ago
Q#1: Consistency in accuracy and time?I guess I'm not that consistent ma'am.If you you would scramble he cube and let me solve it SBF(as you call it ma'am), and my MAJOR goal would be to solve it fast.(like in the video) The probability would be at least 1 successful solve in maybe 8 to 10 tries.(that's by experience in making this video).
pulangasukal 3 years ago
You are obviously using a speedsolve method rather than a conventional blindfold method. While blindfold solving using a speed method like Fridrich is possible (it's known as speed blindfold) the best speed blindfolders take well over 5-10 minutes to memorize the cube.
Please explain yourself. My guess is you used a pre-memorized scramble (scrambled in front of the camera). Otherwise, I'd appreciate an explanation of your method. Can you do conventional blindfold?
ssrc 3 years ago
Thanks for the comment ssrc.You made a very decent, honest question so i guess you deserve a thank you for your comment.
Well, I didn't knew until now that other people uses the Friedrich Method as a basis for speed BF solving. And i thought I was unique.lols.
For your question:
1. No I can't to the conventional. But I know the theory. i can only do the corner orientation and the corner permutation but my memory sucks at the edges. But I'm still trying to learn them coz their more accurate.
pulangasukal 3 years ago
question 2.
1. the truth is this wasn't my first try. This was actually my 8th. So yeah I don't concentrate on my solved average. I just did it for my video.I just wanted to think fast and just try again if i fail. That's why it only took me 38 sec to do it. Coz some of it are just lucky guesses(Like the OLL)
2. Easy cross.The first 2 F2L was easy. I just need to insert them. So i just focused on the 2nd and third F2L, The PLL then guessed the OLL. whoalla!! lucky 1 min. solve.
pulangasukal 3 years ago
HOLY CRAP!! your the rubic chick who did the 4x4x4 blindfolds. I always watch your video. your one of my inspiration why i did one of my own.
pulangasukal 3 years ago