I wish all Occupy people were socialists. Unfortunately I think most are social liberals, social democrats or progressive democrats. Some maybe socialist, but I think the majority of them are supporter of a social capitalist system ( unfortunately ).
How dare you try and tax my second boat or third car? Can't you just ride the bus in peace, the back of the bus preferably. Why should your sweat and labour that actually builds homes, highways, bridges, etc., be taxed less than my inheritance or tax shelter. Why should I not make money off of laying you off? Why pay tax to have the government re-distribute it to those with less, when we can give it to those with already too much. Next you will want your vote to count. Peace
What he is doing here is not intellectually honest even if he has some points ...
Compare the uprising in the 60s which occupy wall street -> are you mentally retarded?
I am not a tee party guy but his point with the police not attacking them because they where in parks, is false. Because that is the point, if occupy Wall Street was in parks would the police attack them? - NOOO.
@MrNaturalMan The comparison was made as a counter-argument to Bill O'Reilly indicating that defying police orders instantly made them (for lack of a better word) bad people.
Bill, there are people who use to love your show...until they found out what a bias lier you actually are...such a dissapointment...nowadays, i dont trust any News organization on TV,period...over time you will only lose viewers, not gain them...guaranteed!!! RON PAUL 2012
It's pretty obvious that many of the OWS fanatics are socialists. Some of them hold up signs that say things like "capitalism doesn't work", and "why is socialism such a dirty word?" It's about time some on the left started fessing up to what they are about. At this point I am not sure if others on the left are ignorant of it, or just dishonest. I guess I just find it hard to fathom how some of them can still be ignorant of it when many of them are frankly admitting to it. This is crazy.
@Jesse859 it would be better if right fessed up to there divide and conquer stratagy and own up for there teaparty propaganda which supports the phony capitalists system that only makes the top 1% rich while taking from everyone else, palin to ron paul were bought and paid for by those who brought you the housing bubble of 08
Damn, pffieeuuww. How on earth are those retards of FOX even allowed to be on television, with their even more retarded "not telling the whole story and throwing out the craziest hypotheses" comments. Muslims behind Occupy, hahaha. They say China have propaganda, they say Russia has election frauds. But the US defenitly have a farce democracy, controlled by banking/corporation establishments, having FOX mask it all up. America, wake up! Education/Health should be about life, not profits.
Yet, the outlets "rightist media establishment" will attempt to rebuke such statements made on the Tea Party when they are made by outlets in "the leftist media establishment." And the cycle goes on ad nauseam.
the celts(the basques are the original celts n original europeans and their descendants the irish,the scots, the welsh,the cornish,the bretons and the catalan people) are USA's real forefathers not the anglo saxons...damn jealous liars n manipulators..we are atlanteans n u freaks cant stand it...england's dirty queen is a cheatin n evil illuminati n her dirty kind(jew mixed with saxon) concealed real history...busted bastards...pass it on actively!!!
Saying that the OWS protesters hate capitalism is like saying that rape victims hate sex. It's not the system itself they're against; it's the way it's abused and manipulated in the name of power at the expense of others.
are you kidding! i disagree with O'reilly but i did see alot of Antisemitism surfacing, just because you say it occured doesn't make you an Anti-Semite. Saying it's occurring because us Jews run the banks is wrong though. i went down to the protest and there was a big asshole flying a kick the Zionists out of wall street Now that, that's antisemitism in a nutshell. The guy hosting this video's a cocky asshole. I dislike him and O'reilly both fuck em!
bill o reilley is an asshole and an idiot but for once he made a good point. the occupy movement was completely anti-capitalist (and for all the wrong reasons at that)
@poopguypenis2 Yes, because the rich exploiting their workers and using lobbyists to make loop holes in the tax codes so they can get out of paying their taxes is definitely wrong reasons to protest. -.-
@poopguypenis2 Yes, I'm sorry political analyst poopguypenis you would definitely have real knowledge on what the OWS movement is about. I told you some of the most valid points the OWS bring up and you said they have nothing to do with capitalism which means you disagree with your own original point, that's what I'm trying to get at.
Occupy Wall Street actually gave me a little bit of hope for a better life,hope it doesn t stop there,I don t know what Bill wants and I don t really give a
Bill O'Reilly is so precious. You have to admit he is very useful for comedic purposes. Going off topic hear, I recently heard that the reason they didn't find the WMD's in Iraq is because they were stuck up O'Reilly's ass.
BOREeilly has a few synapses not working or he has a few crossed wires in the brain. Has anyone thought of a game where we could shoot, torture or blow up a BOREilly character?? That would be fun..."Angry Bill"
I want all to know that this is not capitolism this is cronie capitolism- anytime you have lobbyist and special interest groups paying off your government officials it cannot be capitolism.
Why cant the alternative be Denmark? or Norway? or Sweden?
Sweden managed the crisis extremely well, much better than the US, guess what, Sweden is socialistic in American standards, even with the liberal government.
You know you're good when other people like this fat guy have to do their reporting on the real reporter (Oreilly). Oreilly talks the real issues, this moron talks Oreilly.
@kargwain187 I'll be happy to respond to your question when you learn how to spell disseminate and responses. Did you go to school, are you an Obama supporter, or are you just that dumb? I'm interested to know...
@25September1985 My apologies sir for offending you so greatly, i was infact in a hurry. As for whether i support child killer number 1, 2 or 3, I am forced to say I dont support any of them. Bill o reilly is a sack of shit who covers up for war criminals and child murderers. Obama is the war criminal and the child murderer. Through this america sleeps , wrapped up cosily in its own self importance. However now awaking to a nightmare. The dollar is disappearing. Thank god
for m Occupy movement is about f***cking CEOS making as much as the average Canadian in half a work day (like 8 million a yuear) when the average canadians wage decreased!
Bill O'Riley really needs to learn when to shut his mouth until he actually RESEARCHES and understands what things are about. Him, Rush Limbaugh, FOX News and other conservative anchors spew their biased, fascist, right-wing, corporate agenda to brainwash and control the people and keep them stupid, racist, and ignorant.
@Stevo6452 Does Bill O'Riley ever get anything right? Bill is a ignorant, stupid, racist, conservative hick. What the fuck does he know about anything?
youngturks, GTFO you piece of garbage. Nobody cares about your terrorist opinions you fat faggot. Good job on putting tags so that your shit videos appear on every search.
@10trojan10 judging by the amount of time you have on your hands to start arguments over youtube i would think shared income would benefit you unemployed self -_- GET A LIFE!!!!
its sad when you cannot even make a sinmple comment on youtube without being attaked by people like you.
@pitster110 Making observations is not starting an argument. And I'm sorry you couldn't spell very well in your earlier post and for you also not understanding the concept of OWS. It's not so much sharing the wealth as in making things more equal/coming up with an economy that doesn't cater to the rich. You know, the type of economy most the developed countries have.
Videos like this and the people who agree with them really make society as a whole look bad. This country was built on hard work and achievement, yet all OWS seeks is the ability to rob the rich, who have earned their money, and give it to the poor, who haven't. They don't think it's fair that groups of people have more money than they do. They don't think it's fair that they went through college only to have to start at the bottom like everybody else. Uygar is nothing but a propagandist.
@jmn120176 I'm sorry I wasn't aware you knew exactly what OWS stood for? Where's your evidence dipshit? You don't know shit. You think CENK is the propograndist and NOT FAUX NEWS? You're a fucking moron.
The Occupy Wall Street movement is about stopping Corporations from controlling Government. As far as "Spread the Wealth" They are talking about the fact that the majority of the wealth has gone to the Richest 1% through demonizing unions, Moving manufacturing base overseas for greater profit. Rather than paying a living wage for work.
This is so frustrating. Now the movement is being hijacked by Socialists trying to push their agenda, and now we have a Hitler-esque war going on against Socialism in America. "We need to shut down the Commies and save America from the Commies" is going to increasingly become the media's chant. Meanwhile, the truth remains hidden from the public view...
Brothers and sisters-the time of austerity is upon us. Get used to living in the streets. Get used to having nothing-no education-no jobs-no heath care-no social security-no retirement-no home-no future. When the banks and republicans take everything that's exactly what you'll have-nothing!
Look at HISTORY. Jews and later Zionists just EXPLOIT. PERIOD. A fithy religion that will be exterminated. When the human animal finally realises what nonsense all reliligion, really is!
In this day and age with all our technology, should humans have to compete for resources that are there? Capitalism forces this ruthless competition among people, to acquire and acquire. And when one person acquires too much, some person somewhere is deprived. What's the difference between profit and exploitation(Both mean getting more than actual worth)? There is no difference. So keep profiting and profiting,bankers. Keep depriving and exploiting.
Okay, there are two different things going on in the Wall Street protests:
1. "Stop big corporations controlling our government!" - That, I agree with. It's unfair to voters and unconstitutional.
2. "Spread the wealth!" - Total bullshit. If a rich person loses all their money, the money will not be given to you anyway. Plus, it's socialism and it is unfair to people who actually worked hard and honestly for their fortunes.
@foojuice101 Man I couldn't agree with you more. I'm hesitant to support OWS because it seems as though about 60-70% are citizens with valid concerns, and the other 30-40% are loony-toon communists trying to abolish wealth all together.
IKR? Apparently, they think it is illegal to be rich in any way shape or form. If you were bankrupted by a wealthy person taking control of your government then yes, protest all you want.
But going out and buying a million iPhones and iPads then saying "OMG CORPORATIONS ARE TOO RICH GIVE BACK MY MONEY YOU CORRUPT CAPITALIST SCUMBAGS HURR DURR" is not a proper reason to protest.
@foojuice101 On a sidenote, most of these bankers did indeed work hard, but certainly not honestly for their fortunes. Exploiting the weak or the earth for self-enrichment can't really be called fair, now can it?
When I say "people who worked hard and honestly for their fortunes", I meant rich people in general, not just the Wall Street guys. And really, it all boils down to LOOK AFTER YOUR OWN MONEY. When it comes to your money, you have to take responsibility for it when you can.
Besides, if these Wall Street assholes suddenly became poor, the people they ripped off wouldn't get the money anyway. No point in protesting for socialism.
@foojuice101 Where did I ever say that WS-scumbags should be robbed from their fortunes? I don't give a fuck how much money they, or anyone else for that matter, have. It's about how they threat their employees, mankind and the environment in general.
Since everyone is only thinking about his own wealth, rich and poor alike, no one ever mentions social problems which are the side-effects of capitalism.
Yes, like living in a house, eating food and going to work affects the environment too.
Also, if anything is worse than the other, it's socialism/communism that's worse than capitalism. I'm not saying that capitalism doesn't have a bad side, I'm just saying that it's really the best anyone's got.
1. You will NEVER own anything. All land is owned and controlled by the govt and you pay 90yrs worth of rent (in China it is like that).
2. If you earn money, it will be taken from you and distributed to everyone else. People who don't work get money. People who do work don't get all of it.
3. If you own a business, goods are manufactured according to what the govt wants, and you have no control over the output of your own business, even if it is severely hurting your profits.
@foojuice101 Why are you so obsessed with money? Why do you care so much about owning materials, goods, anything at all? Are you unable to think about other people instead of yourself? Is your stashed bankaccount worth more than a thousand lives?
Communism cares for people, so that even the weakest might have some moments of joy in this miserable society. But they'll never get that since mankind is so damn selfish.
Okay, mate. Try living a couple of years without money, food or a house. See how "TOTALLY AWESOME" communism is after you experience that. Get a reality check, dude. People need money and people need stuff (not necessarily in excess) if you are going to survive in a modernized society.
Have you studied history at all? Communism doesn't care for people. It just gives the government the power to control everything you have. You even have to RENT land from them. Capiche?
@foojuice101 First off, living in a valuta-free society doesn't require me to have money. Living in a capitalist society requires you to have some currency to get along, so that's a bullshit argument. You can't live a socialist life in a society that despises it.
Secondly, YES, I have studied history. Fortunately I am able to observe historical events, ideologies and such in a different way then society expects me to.
Okay, you can go be a Buddhist monk then. They don't like worldly objects and I'm sure that they'd love to take you in as their apprentice.
Look, if your idea is to change the entire society to socialists, then I don't think it's going to work. Generally, society likes to make money. If you don't like it, you can choose t go live in a monastery because people who live there are a small society of people who like to share and let go of trivial things such as money and stuff.
@foojuice101 And I was hoping that you'd bring up that argument that communism is authoritarian and repressive. Because that is proof for me that you did not study it at all.
If you'd read the very origins of communism, 'the Communist Manifesto', you'd find out that communism is far from dictatorial, but that it's purely based on redistribution of matter.
Late communist countries failed to follow the very essence of communism, which is why they were as crooked as capitalist countries.
I never said that communism was oppressive. I just said that it gives the government a lot of power over a lot of things, which it does.
You gave the traditional definition of communism, aka marxism/socialism. Where everyone distributes and supports each other etc etc etc. Modern communism, however, is more extreme. Instead of everything being publicly owned (traditionally, the people control stuff), the government controls all the stuff instead...like your house, for example.
@foojuice101 .youre such a twat its unreal.modern communism?rofl name me one country with this modern communism.whats wring with america?america is one o the most far right economic countries in the world you morin,how onearth is america even close to socialism or anything like that?you dont ahve a clue.
You're the one who hasn't got a clue. I never said that America was a communist/socialist/marxist country. Can you read?
Go and read my comments again and you'll see that I never said that America was a communist country. And while you're at it, go take a third grade English class because you type like a dyslexic five year-old having a seizure over the keyboard.
@foojuice101 You really don't know what socialism is. It's not about collectivizing everything (that's COMMUNISM- subtle, yet significant difference). It's about providing and guaranteeing a better baseline for citizen's rights (to health, to dignity, to safety, to sufficient funds) by any means possible, and that means redistributing SOME wealth. Believe me, the mega rich of Canada, and the US, can afford to be taxed 50 or 60 %. Feel free to disagree (and yes, you can do that in socialism).
@foojuice101 Your second point is complete bullshit and is the epitome of American ignorance about socialism. Distributing wealth evenly to the people is Communism, not Socialism. Socialism would be turning the wealth taken from the rich, and allowing the State to put it towards things like health-care, education, technology, etc. instead of the rich keeping it for themselves. Not only this, but most people do NOT work honestly for their fortune, so it's not unfair.
@foojuice101 1. I couldn't care less if you are American or not, your ignorance is at the same level as them, which is pathetic. 2. Where did I say every rich person is a corrupt Wall Street guy...? My point is that there are in fact, many rich people who either a) Are rich for no reason (such as stupid celebrities like the Jersey Shore cast) or b) Gained wealth through good means, but now misuse the system. I never said all. Still, your argument is complete bullshit.
@foojuice101 By spreading the wealth they just want to close the inequality gap. Most aren't asking for equal pay. They bringing up the point the gap between the top 1% earners and the other 99% is growing larger and larger. Plus the fact that the rich are paying less and less taxes in terms of effective tax rate. If you can't see that the rich are too rich and that the inequality gap is absolutely staggering and out of control, then you need to come to reality.
Look, now protesting against the rich paying less tax than everyone else IS a legitimate protest because it's unfair on others. Saying that the rich people's high taxes should be used in healthcare etc. is also a proper reason to protest.
However, there are people in OWS who actually protest on the grounds of "the rich people are too rich so, we should take their money and make them equal to us". THAT'S what I'm saying is bullshit.
the people at occupy wall street are retarded. this one was mad about having over $100,000 in student loans to pay back(and he was still going to college). hey, don't take $150,000 in college classes and then bitch about having to pay for it.
@trilobright the reason clashes between the OWS and the police is because they wouldn't move out the park on wall street, and that they have been raping women and throwing pee and blood at food markets for not giving them free food. they are not a peaceful movement. when you act violently, then the police will intervene
Raping women AND throwing pee and blood, you say? Yep, still sounds like a delightful soiree compared to a typical tea party even where they lynch Obama in effigy for being an atheist Mawz-lom.
@trilobright Define "ruling elites". If you are talking about the rich, anyone can be rich so it wouldn't make anyone nervous. The only ruling elite is the government, which is who the Tea Party goes after.
@GracieJujitsu1 The main message of OWS is that they want an economy geared towards the 99%, or the middle class, poor, and semi-rich. That makes sense.
@10trojan10 Why should there be an economy geared to those who are not willing to work hard? That would be a poor economy indeed. That's like saying we should reward teachers based on the 99% that are average, and the 1% of the best teachers shouldn't be treated any differently.
@GracieJujitsu1 Plenty of people bust their ass at work, yet they still get paid very little. Plenty of people work as hard as the people that are rich, yet they get paid very modestly. You're an idiot to think poor, and middle-class americans don't work hard.
@10trojan10 That's a lie, and you know it. 99% of the population wants a comfortable secure 9-5 job with little responsibility. That's why they are the 99%. It's the 1% that work from 5:00AM to 12:00PM and take on personal liability of tens of thousands of dollars to start up a business.
No, I know they don't work hard relative to entrepreneurs, and they don't have nearly as much responsibility, sorry.
@GracieJujitsu1 LOL you're such an idiot. Yes, people want a secure 8-5 job; but that doesn't mean they don't work hard at that job. In fact, for it to be secure, they have to work hard so they can keep it and even then they're not guaranteed anything. And BS that the 1% work 19 hours a day. Yes there's some that do that, but very few. In fact, there's plenty of poor people that work those hours just to make do. And most entrepreneurs aren't the 1%, it's the CEO's.
@GracieJujitsu1 You know the majority of the 1% aren't entrepreneurs right? It's the big business and their owners. Very few, entrepreneurs make it this big; most are middle-class Americans. Yes there's a Bill Gates and Steve Jobs every once in a while, but most super rich are CEO's of existing companies. I really don't think you have any idea how the American economy works or who the super rich are.
@GracieJujitsu1 Much of the 1% is also the people that led their company to bankruptcy, but get paid millions of dollars in bailouts. A lot are in the financial profession where they ripped off average Americans (watch the Inside Job). And for everyone of the 1% that works those extreme hours you stated, there's thousands of Americans that work those same hours just so they can pay for their mortgage, food, etc.
@10trojan10 First of all, bailouts are supported by OWS. Do you know why? Because they support a bigger government which promotes that kind of state capitalism. It sounds like you should be promoting the Tea Party, but you lack comprehension on what OWS actually is.
There are no poor people that stay poor for long who work 5:00am to 12:00pm intelligently while furthering their financial education.
Again, you are not even an OWS supporter. You don't know what OWS is.
@GracieJujitsu1 "There is no poor people that stay poor for long who work 5:00 am to 12:00 pm intelligently." Well that's just completely false. Not everyone is blessed with a college degree and they have to take any jobs to get by. I know plenty of examples where people have to take second and even third jobs just so they can make due. And I haven't hardly said anything about OWS, I'm talking about the inequality in our economy. And honestly I don't know why I'm talking to someone who believes
@10trojan10 You think you need a college degree to become rich? College degrees prepare for employment, and offer some knowledge. Bill Gates dropped out, so did many other rich people. Stop spouting your bullshit, you get no more replies from me.
@GracieJujitsu1 You don't need a college degree but it helps. But your insulting millions of Americans by saying it is their fault that they are poor or middle class. You say it is because they are lazy, or don't like responsibility, or aren't intelligently working. This is not the case. You're the one spouting bullshit.
@GracieJujitsu1 Isn't OWS about getting more equal distribution of income and reducing the influence corporations have on politics, among others? Don't tell me I don't know what OWS is. I might not know everything but I have a basic idea, unlike you I believe.
@GracieJujitsu1 that entrepreneurs are the 1%. You really don't understand the inequality gap or the gini coefficient do you? You don't understand that America is far behind other developed countries in terms of economic fairness do you? You can't see that the middle class and lower income class is in big danger can you? Why are you against an economy that would make the middle class larger and shrink the inequality gap?
@BoredomCorner See, none of you can even comprehend what I am talking about. They do support bailouts, they are just too stupid to realize it. What does OWS support? MORE government intervention in the economy. What promotes bailouts? Corporate/state capitalism, which is when government passes legislation in favor of large corporations. Asking for more regulation encourages MORE favors to big corporations.
@GracieJujitsu1 It's a different kind of intervention. The bailouts were rewarding bad behavior and encouraging more of it, giving them something to keep their destructive tendencies going. What the OWSers want is the gov't to stop enabling these bastards, and instead stop them. Like how a parent should discourage and punish bad behavior their child uses, like bullying, not activity encourage and further enable said behavior.
@JessePrower Read what I just wrote. OWS wants more bailouts (they don't know it but that is what they are asking for). The Tea Party doesn't want government bailouts.
Can OWS supporters not understand such a simple concept?
@GracieJujitsu1 That's not what they want you retard. Just because you are in favor of more government intervention, doesn't mean you're in favor of bailouts. They want an economy that reduces the inequality gap. So yes, for this to happen there might (probably will) have to be more government intervention. But in no way does it mean since there is more government intervention, then there must be bailout as well. You can have government intervention without bailouts. How can you not understand
@GracieJujitsu1 And stop trying to say that OWS supporters should actually be for the Tea Party. The Tea Party is for the elimination of income taxes or for a flat tax rate. This happens to be something that would benefit the rich more than any other group.
@JessePrower You're explanation makes sense. But @graciejujitsu1 is incapable of understanding simple concepts. He or she doesn't/can't comprehend that there can be different types of government intervention. He/she makes the assumption that if you want government intervention, then you must be for bailouts which is completely idiotic statement to make.
@GracieJujitsu1 Plus, if someone is not willing to work hard, they would be fired. America needs to close the inequality gap because it's one of the biggest in the world. There is no reason for this large inequality and it will have serious consequences. Our gini coefficient is 44th worst in the world. This doesn't sound too bad, but nearly all the other "highly developed" countries/1st world countries are below us and have a much lower gini coefficient
Cenk Uygur is such a bad journalist, it is no wonder why he didnt make it on any major network, and his 48000 views shows that nobody wants to watch you! You have to show clips from Bill O'reilly's popular show, and then throw in your whinning and ranting. Stop talking nonsense , and go put your tent up with the rest of the occuputz LOSERS in a park somewhere, dueshe bag!
@TheWhiteOp What he says is liberal propaganda, he compares the occupy idiots to civil rights protests in the 1960's. He is an idiot, he has a horrible show, and thats why cnn fired him, thats why he cant get more views, and thats why he has to show Bill O'Reilly, in order to get people to watch him.
you are completely right. he cuts off before Bill can say everything and besides Obama failed the economy and liberals dirty talk about FOX NEWS and blame blame blame. They think Bill O'riely is wrong and all this guy talks about is crap and if we let people like him run the country we would live in a horrible bankrupt place with lunatics everywhere
@otherwise261 English is not my first language and I spell better than you, lol.. Btw - I'm from a socialist country and were doing hella lot better than the US..
@nielsb90 Your doing hella lot better? Yeah your english is great! Do us a favor and stay in your socialist country and the U.S.A is still the most prosperous and successful country in the world!
@otherwise261 Yeah that's right, because your country is #1 world-exploiter. Feel fucking proud about it, and try to forget how many people have to live in miserable conditions for every million you count.
Give it up Cenk. You'll never reach the level of Bill O'reilly; you're small time. And it's pretty fucking disgusting you brought up the civil rights movement in this piece, you intellectually dishonest left wing hack. Has nothing to do with that. This movement is clearly Anti-Capitalist in nature. These dumb fucks are not students of history and fail to see Socialism and Communism HAVE NEVER WORKED.
Guys, call O'Reilly whatever you want, he's still got the #1 cable news show on the #1 news network. I can't believe the top comments are just an absolute character assassination of Bill, which I guess is what we can expect from the liberals now that they know their President is failing miserably.
And is O'Reilly really wrong about the Occupiers? REALLY? Don't say he's trying to smear the movement, the movement has smeared themselves. They're exactly what America SHOULDN'T be!
Muslims?!! Then there must be terrorists too!!! o_0 It is new form of terrorism called Protesting! We must not let them do that! Government must keep us safe!
This guy is nuts!! First, Bill and Fox News have played multiple clips from people at the protests saying that the Jews and Isreal are responcible. I found it funny how this guy never shows the clips that Bill has shown multiple times on the show. Second, many of the protestors have demanded that corporations and banks spread the wealth around so t pay for everyoones mortages, college tuitions, etc. That is what Greece, Cuba, and many European nations are doing and are about to collapse
@MisterSmiley91 You do realize that the United states is only moderatly better right? You idiots have run up such a huge debt you are fucking over the entire world.
If you can not afford to go to a prestigious university then don't go!! Unless you have a scholarship go to a jr college or a community college and I bet you will get a better education then any of these elitist professors who use a teachers aid because they are too busy to educate!!
Bill O'Reilly is a moron who talks over people he disagrees with and throws words like ''socialist'' into the argument to insight fear in his right wing viewers who, sadly, probably don't know what socialist means, yet foam at the mouth when they hear it.
The reason Bill uses these tactics is because he doesn't want the debate to reach it's logical conclusion.
In other words, he doesn't want to lose a debate on national television and be made to look like the fool he is.
@ec123456789able - first off bill o has had the #1 cable news show for like 12 years straight, you cannot dominate like that with just right wing viewers, it takes a large base of people on the right,left, and middle to produce the numbers he is so just right there your pretty much a moron, 2ndly an overwhelming majority of people do know what socialist gov. is ... AND WE DONT FUCKING WANT IT !
@kos22us Bill O is another shitstain on America that pukes like you deserve. Let these corporate mouth pieces run your patheic life from cradle to grave. Republicans are the shitstains on America that have little bitty thoughts with big bank accounts. R U 1`of these Wall Street cocksuckers 2? Social Security, Medicare, Medicade, and agriculture subsidies are socialism you fucking dumbass. And can we not call giving millionares and billionares 75% of all the Bush tax cuts a form of socialism.
@kos22us Only 3% of viewers of The O'Reilly Factor identify as liberal, the other 97% identify as conservative, so yes, he is only on TV because the right-wing watch him.
Just because someone objects to corporatism and economic unfairness does not mean they are a socialist, I believe in a free market, however the current system is elitist. Just as elitist as communism as a matter of fact.
There needs to be more regulation on the banks and currency, whilst maintaining economic libertarianism.
@ec123456789able bill is right and the rest of america agrees with him thats why he has more viewers then anyone the Occupied people are a bunch of commie,socialist look at the signs and the rape free zones and the deaths that have happen and i didnt get that from fox i and you can get online and see what these cowards are all about 22% of the people want nothing to do with you commie bitches ''''''LONG LIVE FOX NEWS AND THE TEA PARTY
I wish all Occupy people were socialists. Unfortunately I think most are social liberals, social democrats or progressive democrats. Some maybe socialist, but I think the majority of them are supporter of a social capitalist system ( unfortunately ).
UDSS 20 hours ago
bills a likes it in the butt so he can talk when he taking a cock
speedtuff 22 hours ago
How dare you try and tax my second boat or third car? Can't you just ride the bus in peace, the back of the bus preferably. Why should your sweat and labour that actually builds homes, highways, bridges, etc., be taxed less than my inheritance or tax shelter. Why should I not make money off of laying you off? Why pay tax to have the government re-distribute it to those with less, when we can give it to those with already too much. Next you will want your vote to count. Peace
EattherichBuddy 22 hours ago
What he is doing here is not intellectually honest even if he has some points ...
Compare the uprising in the 60s which occupy wall street -> are you mentally retarded?
I am not a tee party guy but his point with the police not attacking them because they where in parks, is false. Because that is the point, if occupy Wall Street was in parks would the police attack them? - NOOO.
IDIOT
MrNaturalMan 3 days ago
@MrNaturalMan The comparison was made as a counter-argument to Bill O'Reilly indicating that defying police orders instantly made them (for lack of a better word) bad people.
Kjellarnek 1 day ago
Bill, there are people who use to love your show...until they found out what a bias lier you actually are...such a dissapointment...nowadays, i dont trust any News organization on TV,period...over time you will only lose viewers, not gain them...guaranteed!!! RON PAUL 2012
FindSomeChange88 3 days ago
It's pretty obvious that many of the OWS fanatics are socialists. Some of them hold up signs that say things like "capitalism doesn't work", and "why is socialism such a dirty word?" It's about time some on the left started fessing up to what they are about. At this point I am not sure if others on the left are ignorant of it, or just dishonest. I guess I just find it hard to fathom how some of them can still be ignorant of it when many of them are frankly admitting to it. This is crazy.
Jesse859 5 days ago 2
@Jesse859 it would be better if right fessed up to there divide and conquer stratagy and own up for there teaparty propaganda which supports the phony capitalists system that only makes the top 1% rich while taking from everyone else, palin to ron paul were bought and paid for by those who brought you the housing bubble of 08
ryderc69 4 days ago
Damn, pffieeuuww. How on earth are those retards of FOX even allowed to be on television, with their even more retarded "not telling the whole story and throwing out the craziest hypotheses" comments. Muslims behind Occupy, hahaha. They say China have propaganda, they say Russia has election frauds. But the US defenitly have a farce democracy, controlled by banking/corporation establishments, having FOX mask it all up. America, wake up! Education/Health should be about life, not profits.
NiekBeenen 1 week ago 2
Yet, the outlets "rightist media establishment" will attempt to rebuke such statements made on the Tea Party when they are made by outlets in "the leftist media establishment." And the cycle goes on ad nauseam.
Goodatconnect4 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the celts(the basques are the original celts n original europeans and their descendants the irish,the scots, the welsh,the cornish,the bretons and the catalan people) are USA's real forefathers not the anglo saxons...damn jealous liars n manipulators..we are atlanteans n u freaks cant stand it...england's dirty queen is a cheatin n evil illuminati n her dirty kind(jew mixed with saxon) concealed real history...busted bastards...pass it on actively!!!
MiamiDolphinsClyde10 1 week ago
Saying that the OWS protesters hate capitalism is like saying that rape victims hate sex. It's not the system itself they're against; it's the way it's abused and manipulated in the name of power at the expense of others.
jhillst 1 week ago
are you kidding! i disagree with O'reilly but i did see alot of Antisemitism surfacing, just because you say it occured doesn't make you an Anti-Semite. Saying it's occurring because us Jews run the banks is wrong though. i went down to the protest and there was a big asshole flying a kick the Zionists out of wall street Now that, that's antisemitism in a nutshell. The guy hosting this video's a cocky asshole. I dislike him and O'reilly both fuck em!
WhatWouldNinjaDo1 1 week ago
@itscork
Anyone who does not want our politicians to be bought. Buddy Roemer 2012.
T662W379C 2 weeks ago
bill o reilley is an asshole and an idiot but for once he made a good point. the occupy movement was completely anti-capitalist (and for all the wrong reasons at that)
poopguypenis2 2 weeks ago
@poopguypenis2 Yes, because the rich exploiting their workers and using lobbyists to make loop holes in the tax codes so they can get out of paying their taxes is definitely wrong reasons to protest. -.-
TheGreyKnightXx 1 week ago
@TheGreyKnightXx thats not capitalism idiot, try again
poopguypenis2 1 week ago
@poopguypenis2 Well then obviously the occupy movement isn't against capitalism idiot, don't try again you have no point.
TheGreyKnightXx 1 week ago
@TheGreyKnightXx Well then obviously you know nothing about the occupy movement idiot, dont try again you have no point.
poopguypenis2 1 week ago
@poopguypenis2 Yes, I'm sorry political analyst poopguypenis you would definitely have real knowledge on what the OWS movement is about. I told you some of the most valid points the OWS bring up and you said they have nothing to do with capitalism which means you disagree with your own original point, that's what I'm trying to get at.
TheGreyKnightXx 1 week ago
@TheGreyKnightXx then you obviously missed the vast majority of OWS demonstrators touting marxist garbage, IDIOT
poopguypenis2 1 week ago
What kind of a moron would defend the occupy idiots?
itscork 2 weeks ago
@itscork Not quite as moronic as teabaggers
coopmuch56 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
tuseroni 2 weeks ago
@itscork me
tuseroni 2 weeks ago
who the hell is this super-spick.
pipefitter2267 3 weeks ago
@pipefitter2267 fuck you
88SHC 1 week ago
Comment removed
MrMyusernameisawsome 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
google this: "low iq & conservative beliefs linked to prejudice - yahoo news"
Ninetyone11 3 weeks ago
Bill O'Reilly talks such shit
Maff234 1 month ago
NSA Orgasm Donor ver4 =======>>> v=x3NXJQkP8cQ
jackkashmir 1 month ago
Occupy Wall Street actually gave me a little bit of hope for a better life,hope it doesn t stop there,I don t know what Bill wants and I don t really give a
tititanul 1 month ago
Bill O'Reilly is so precious. You have to admit he is very useful for comedic purposes. Going off topic hear, I recently heard that the reason they didn't find the WMD's in Iraq is because they were stuck up O'Reilly's ass.
roger860 1 month ago
apples
OldBenOne 1 month ago
BOREeilly has a few synapses not working or he has a few crossed wires in the brain. Has anyone thought of a game where we could shoot, torture or blow up a BOREilly character?? That would be fun..."Angry Bill"
adrianriviera 1 month ago
I want all to know that this is not capitolism this is cronie capitolism- anytime you have lobbyist and special interest groups paying off your government officials it cannot be capitolism.
The1bassfreak 1 month ago
Why cant the alternative be Denmark? or Norway? or Sweden?
Sweden managed the crisis extremely well, much better than the US, guess what, Sweden is socialistic in American standards, even with the liberal government.
Bill is one weird deluded and destructive dude.
Porkusido 1 month ago
You know you're good when other people like this fat guy have to do their reporting on the real reporter (Oreilly). Oreilly talks the real issues, this moron talks Oreilly.
25September1985 1 month ago
@25September1985
Wow... You're brain has gone through a washing process.
NickNorie15 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@25September1985 May i ask are you being paid to diseminate these responces or are you just that dumb ... im interested to know
kargwain187 3 weeks ago
@kargwain187 I'll be happy to respond to your question when you learn how to spell disseminate and responses. Did you go to school, are you an Obama supporter, or are you just that dumb? I'm interested to know...
25September1985 3 weeks ago
@25September1985 My apologies sir for offending you so greatly, i was infact in a hurry. As for whether i support child killer number 1, 2 or 3, I am forced to say I dont support any of them. Bill o reilly is a sack of shit who covers up for war criminals and child murderers. Obama is the war criminal and the child murderer. Through this america sleeps , wrapped up cosily in its own self importance. However now awaking to a nightmare. The dollar is disappearing. Thank god
kargwain187 3 weeks ago
Big bankers own you and there is nothing you can do
aaronmoravek 1 month ago
Billy O'Reilly what a prize dickhead!
elsoultero 1 month ago
for m Occupy movement is about f***cking CEOS making as much as the average Canadian in half a work day (like 8 million a yuear) when the average canadians wage decreased!
markus122piesuckers 1 month ago
Bill O'Riley really needs to learn when to shut his mouth until he actually RESEARCHES and understands what things are about. Him, Rush Limbaugh, FOX News and other conservative anchors spew their biased, fascist, right-wing, corporate agenda to brainwash and control the people and keep them stupid, racist, and ignorant.
NorCalNik 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RIP Bill O'Reilly :(
VitaminDeth 1 month ago
Do the young turks ever get anything right? I mean ever?
Stevo6452 1 month ago
@Stevo6452 Does Bill O'Riley ever get anything right? Bill is a ignorant, stupid, racist, conservative hick. What the fuck does he know about anything?
NorCalNik 1 month ago
@Stevo6452
So muslims are behind this? dumbass
Abu451 1 month ago
@Stevo6452
no Cenk are his friends are ignorant racists whose hate mirrors the KKK, the black Panthers and Islamic facists
MagicKirin 1 month ago
youngturks, GTFO you piece of garbage. Nobody cares about your terrorist opinions you fat faggot. Good job on putting tags so that your shit videos appear on every search.
doudoub2005 2 months ago
@doudoub2005 Go fuck yourself your racist, ignorant, fascist-conservative hick!
NorCalNik 1 month ago
O'REILLY AND FOX NEWS ARE JOURNALISTIC JOKES! HATE MONGERS AND LIARS!
anarchopablo1 2 months ago
i do not agree with shareing the wealth ill keep the money i earnd thank you vary much
pitster110 2 months ago
@pitster110 Judging by your spelling, I'm willing to guess you'd be the one benefiting from shared income.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@10trojan10 judging by the amount of time you have on your hands to start arguments over youtube i would think shared income would benefit you unemployed self -_- GET A LIFE!!!!
its sad when you cannot even make a sinmple comment on youtube without being attaked by people like you.
pitster110 2 months ago
Comment removed
pitster110 2 months ago
@10trojan10 Judging by the amount of time you have on your hands to start arguments over youtube i am willing to guess that you have NO LIFE! -_-
Its sad when people cannot even make a simple comment on youtube without being attaked by people like you.
pitster110 2 months ago
@pitster110 Making observations is not starting an argument. And I'm sorry you couldn't spell very well in your earlier post and for you also not understanding the concept of OWS. It's not so much sharing the wealth as in making things more equal/coming up with an economy that doesn't cater to the rich. You know, the type of economy most the developed countries have.
10trojan10 2 months ago
Really? He's comparing the 99% to African Americans because they denied police orders? These people were rioting and injuring Police Officers.
Remember the last time black people had to fight in large majorities for their rights?
Oh yeah that was under Martin Luther King Jr. who did it all peacefully without assaulting police officers.
Kreayshawnsucks 2 months ago
"Anti-Semitism"? Oh, so criticizing Israel is anti-Semitic.
CuriousGeorgeMonkey9 2 months ago
Videos like this and the people who agree with them really make society as a whole look bad. This country was built on hard work and achievement, yet all OWS seeks is the ability to rob the rich, who have earned their money, and give it to the poor, who haven't. They don't think it's fair that groups of people have more money than they do. They don't think it's fair that they went through college only to have to start at the bottom like everybody else. Uygar is nothing but a propagandist.
jmn120176 2 months ago
@jmn120176 I'm sorry I wasn't aware you knew exactly what OWS stood for? Where's your evidence dipshit? You don't know shit. You think CENK is the propograndist and NOT FAUX NEWS? You're a fucking moron.
Imcomingguys 2 months ago
The Occupy Wall Street movement is about stopping Corporations from controlling Government. As far as "Spread the Wealth" They are talking about the fact that the majority of the wealth has gone to the Richest 1% through demonizing unions, Moving manufacturing base overseas for greater profit. Rather than paying a living wage for work.
bhelec1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is so frustrating. Now the movement is being hijacked by Socialists trying to push their agenda, and now we have a Hitler-esque war going on against Socialism in America. "We need to shut down the Commies and save America from the Commies" is going to increasingly become the media's chant. Meanwhile, the truth remains hidden from the public view...
JohnWesleyMethodism 2 months ago
Comment removed
JohnWesleyMethodism 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Brothers and sisters-the time of austerity is upon us. Get used to living in the streets. Get used to having nothing-no education-no jobs-no heath care-no social security-no retirement-no home-no future. When the banks and republicans take everything that's exactly what you'll have-nothing!
unclelight 2 months ago
fox news and this guy sum up why america is filled with complete retards. how anyone is stupid enough to buy into foxs crap is laughable
M10663 3 months ago
interesting, these kanackes have to tell us how its going. fuck off if your not white
3xAmigosProductions 3 months ago
@3xAmigosProductions .lol white?be interesting to find out how many there will be in 80 years or so.
M10663 3 months ago
how does it taste to have your protests marginalized by cries of racism, leftards?
UltraProle21 3 months ago
The alternative to capitalism is... Greece??? Greece has a capitalist system.
nmgscp 3 months ago
I'm not a Bill O"Reilly fan but he's spot on with this assessment.
blackhawks64ON 3 months ago
Look at HISTORY. Jews and later Zionists just EXPLOIT. PERIOD. A fithy religion that will be exterminated. When the human animal finally realises what nonsense all reliligion, really is!
Raymondo30837 3 months ago
SOCIALISM is "DEMOCRACY". Capitalism is the rule of the 1%.
Raymondo30837 3 months ago
i hate ows and bill o'reilly - can't decide which I hate more.
joe80dmanizanerd 3 months ago
America and OWS is no longer buying Fox News and Zionist propaganda.
Next they will be saying Iran is supplying OWS.
MendingMedia 3 months ago
Is there something wrong with socialism?
In this day and age with all our technology, should humans have to compete for resources that are there? Capitalism forces this ruthless competition among people, to acquire and acquire. And when one person acquires too much, some person somewhere is deprived. What's the difference between profit and exploitation(Both mean getting more than actual worth)? There is no difference. So keep profiting and profiting,bankers. Keep depriving and exploiting.
rolandocbf 3 months ago
ROFL "I'm surprised they haven't called them gay yet"
MrCaptainSr79 3 months ago
Okay, there are two different things going on in the Wall Street protests:
1. "Stop big corporations controlling our government!" - That, I agree with. It's unfair to voters and unconstitutional.
2. "Spread the wealth!" - Total bullshit. If a rich person loses all their money, the money will not be given to you anyway. Plus, it's socialism and it is unfair to people who actually worked hard and honestly for their fortunes.
foojuice101 3 months ago 5
@foojuice101 Man I couldn't agree with you more. I'm hesitant to support OWS because it seems as though about 60-70% are citizens with valid concerns, and the other 30-40% are loony-toon communists trying to abolish wealth all together.
MrCaptainSr79 3 months ago
@MrCaptainSr79
IKR? Apparently, they think it is illegal to be rich in any way shape or form. If you were bankrupted by a wealthy person taking control of your government then yes, protest all you want.
But going out and buying a million iPhones and iPads then saying "OMG CORPORATIONS ARE TOO RICH GIVE BACK MY MONEY YOU CORRUPT CAPITALIST SCUMBAGS HURR DURR" is not a proper reason to protest.
Do Americans want communism or something?
foojuice101 3 months ago
@foojuice101 On a sidenote, most of these bankers did indeed work hard, but certainly not honestly for their fortunes. Exploiting the weak or the earth for self-enrichment can't really be called fair, now can it?
Tuck213 3 months ago
@Tuck213
When I say "people who worked hard and honestly for their fortunes", I meant rich people in general, not just the Wall Street guys. And really, it all boils down to LOOK AFTER YOUR OWN MONEY. When it comes to your money, you have to take responsibility for it when you can.
Besides, if these Wall Street assholes suddenly became poor, the people they ripped off wouldn't get the money anyway. No point in protesting for socialism.
foojuice101 3 months ago
@foojuice101 Where did I ever say that WS-scumbags should be robbed from their fortunes? I don't give a fuck how much money they, or anyone else for that matter, have. It's about how they threat their employees, mankind and the environment in general.
Since everyone is only thinking about his own wealth, rich and poor alike, no one ever mentions social problems which are the side-effects of capitalism.
Tuck213 3 months ago
@Tuck213
Yes, like living in a house, eating food and going to work affects the environment too.
Also, if anything is worse than the other, it's socialism/communism that's worse than capitalism. I'm not saying that capitalism doesn't have a bad side, I'm just saying that it's really the best anyone's got.
foojuice101 3 months ago
@foojuice101 So, explain to me what's wrong with communism in your opinion?
Tuck213 3 months ago
@Tuck213
1. You will NEVER own anything. All land is owned and controlled by the govt and you pay 90yrs worth of rent (in China it is like that).
2. If you earn money, it will be taken from you and distributed to everyone else. People who don't work get money. People who do work don't get all of it.
3. If you own a business, goods are manufactured according to what the govt wants, and you have no control over the output of your own business, even if it is severely hurting your profits.
foojuice101 3 months ago
@foojuice101 Why are you so obsessed with money? Why do you care so much about owning materials, goods, anything at all? Are you unable to think about other people instead of yourself? Is your stashed bankaccount worth more than a thousand lives?
Communism cares for people, so that even the weakest might have some moments of joy in this miserable society. But they'll never get that since mankind is so damn selfish.
Tuck213 3 months ago
@Tuck213
Okay, mate. Try living a couple of years without money, food or a house. See how "TOTALLY AWESOME" communism is after you experience that. Get a reality check, dude. People need money and people need stuff (not necessarily in excess) if you are going to survive in a modernized society.
Have you studied history at all? Communism doesn't care for people. It just gives the government the power to control everything you have. You even have to RENT land from them. Capiche?
foojuice101 3 months ago
@foojuice101 First off, living in a valuta-free society doesn't require me to have money. Living in a capitalist society requires you to have some currency to get along, so that's a bullshit argument. You can't live a socialist life in a society that despises it.
Secondly, YES, I have studied history. Fortunately I am able to observe historical events, ideologies and such in a different way then society expects me to.
Tuck213 3 months ago
@Tuck213
Okay, you can go be a Buddhist monk then. They don't like worldly objects and I'm sure that they'd love to take you in as their apprentice.
Look, if your idea is to change the entire society to socialists, then I don't think it's going to work. Generally, society likes to make money. If you don't like it, you can choose t go live in a monastery because people who live there are a small society of people who like to share and let go of trivial things such as money and stuff.
Good idea?
foojuice101 3 months ago
@foojuice101 And I was hoping that you'd bring up that argument that communism is authoritarian and repressive. Because that is proof for me that you did not study it at all.
If you'd read the very origins of communism, 'the Communist Manifesto', you'd find out that communism is far from dictatorial, but that it's purely based on redistribution of matter.
Late communist countries failed to follow the very essence of communism, which is why they were as crooked as capitalist countries.
Tuck213 3 months ago
@Tuck213
I never said that communism was oppressive. I just said that it gives the government a lot of power over a lot of things, which it does.
You gave the traditional definition of communism, aka marxism/socialism. Where everyone distributes and supports each other etc etc etc. Modern communism, however, is more extreme. Instead of everything being publicly owned (traditionally, the people control stuff), the government controls all the stuff instead...like your house, for example.
foojuice101 3 months ago
@foojuice101 .youre such a twat its unreal.modern communism?rofl name me one country with this modern communism.whats wring with america?america is one o the most far right economic countries in the world you morin,how onearth is america even close to socialism or anything like that?you dont ahve a clue.
M10663 3 months ago
@M10663
You're the one who hasn't got a clue. I never said that America was a communist/socialist/marxist country. Can you read?
Go and read my comments again and you'll see that I never said that America was a communist country. And while you're at it, go take a third grade English class because you type like a dyslexic five year-old having a seizure over the keyboard.
foojuice101 3 months ago
@Tuck213 With communism, you can always expect it to not "follow the very essence" of itself. You can not fight human nature.
ArborWeek 3 months ago
@foojuice101 You really don't know what socialism is. It's not about collectivizing everything (that's COMMUNISM- subtle, yet significant difference). It's about providing and guaranteeing a better baseline for citizen's rights (to health, to dignity, to safety, to sufficient funds) by any means possible, and that means redistributing SOME wealth. Believe me, the mega rich of Canada, and the US, can afford to be taxed 50 or 60 %. Feel free to disagree (and yes, you can do that in socialism).
SirDanOfHell 2 months ago
@foojuice101 Your second point is complete bullshit and is the epitome of American ignorance about socialism. Distributing wealth evenly to the people is Communism, not Socialism. Socialism would be turning the wealth taken from the rich, and allowing the State to put it towards things like health-care, education, technology, etc. instead of the rich keeping it for themselves. Not only this, but most people do NOT work honestly for their fortune, so it's not unfair.
ThePuffyDuck 2 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck
I'm not American
foojuice101 2 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck
LOL You're actually assuming that every rich person in the US is some corrupt Wall Street guy?
foojuice101 2 months ago
@foojuice101 1. I couldn't care less if you are American or not, your ignorance is at the same level as them, which is pathetic. 2. Where did I say every rich person is a corrupt Wall Street guy...? My point is that there are in fact, many rich people who either a) Are rich for no reason (such as stupid celebrities like the Jersey Shore cast) or b) Gained wealth through good means, but now misuse the system. I never said all. Still, your argument is complete bullshit.
ThePuffyDuck 2 months ago
@ThePuffyDuck
1. Fuck "Jersey Shore" and its stupid cast
2. Read my comment to 10trojan10. I think you might have misunderstood my initial comment
foojuice101 2 months ago
@foojuice101 By spreading the wealth they just want to close the inequality gap. Most aren't asking for equal pay. They bringing up the point the gap between the top 1% earners and the other 99% is growing larger and larger. Plus the fact that the rich are paying less and less taxes in terms of effective tax rate. If you can't see that the rich are too rich and that the inequality gap is absolutely staggering and out of control, then you need to come to reality.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@10trojan10
Look, now protesting against the rich paying less tax than everyone else IS a legitimate protest because it's unfair on others. Saying that the rich people's high taxes should be used in healthcare etc. is also a proper reason to protest.
However, there are people in OWS who actually protest on the grounds of "the rich people are too rich so, we should take their money and make them equal to us". THAT'S what I'm saying is bullshit.
Everything else is okay with me.
foojuice101 2 months ago
Occupy Pyongyang!
TheTollundWoman 3 months ago
the people at occupy wall street are retarded. this one was mad about having over $100,000 in student loans to pay back(and he was still going to college). hey, don't take $150,000 in college classes and then bitch about having to pay for it.
18rubiks 3 months ago
The Tea Party never led to violent clashes with the police because they never said anything that made the ruling elites nervous.
trilobright 3 months ago 9
@trilobright the reason clashes between the OWS and the police is because they wouldn't move out the park on wall street, and that they have been raping women and throwing pee and blood at food markets for not giving them free food. they are not a peaceful movement. when you act violently, then the police will intervene
18rubiks 3 months ago
@18rubiks
Raping women AND throwing pee and blood, you say? Yep, still sounds like a delightful soiree compared to a typical tea party even where they lynch Obama in effigy for being an atheist Mawz-lom.
trilobright 3 months ago
@trilobright Define "ruling elites". If you are talking about the rich, anyone can be rich so it wouldn't make anyone nervous. The only ruling elite is the government, which is who the Tea Party goes after.
OWS doesn't make sense. Simple as that.
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 The main message of OWS is that they want an economy geared towards the 99%, or the middle class, poor, and semi-rich. That makes sense.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@10trojan10 Why should there be an economy geared to those who are not willing to work hard? That would be a poor economy indeed. That's like saying we should reward teachers based on the 99% that are average, and the 1% of the best teachers shouldn't be treated any differently.
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 Plenty of people bust their ass at work, yet they still get paid very little. Plenty of people work as hard as the people that are rich, yet they get paid very modestly. You're an idiot to think poor, and middle-class americans don't work hard.
10trojan10 2 months ago
Comment removed
10trojan10 2 months ago
@10trojan10 That's a lie, and you know it. 99% of the population wants a comfortable secure 9-5 job with little responsibility. That's why they are the 99%. It's the 1% that work from 5:00AM to 12:00PM and take on personal liability of tens of thousands of dollars to start up a business.
No, I know they don't work hard relative to entrepreneurs, and they don't have nearly as much responsibility, sorry.
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 LOL you're such an idiot. Yes, people want a secure 8-5 job; but that doesn't mean they don't work hard at that job. In fact, for it to be secure, they have to work hard so they can keep it and even then they're not guaranteed anything. And BS that the 1% work 19 hours a day. Yes there's some that do that, but very few. In fact, there's plenty of poor people that work those hours just to make do. And most entrepreneurs aren't the 1%, it's the CEO's.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 You know the majority of the 1% aren't entrepreneurs right? It's the big business and their owners. Very few, entrepreneurs make it this big; most are middle-class Americans. Yes there's a Bill Gates and Steve Jobs every once in a while, but most super rich are CEO's of existing companies. I really don't think you have any idea how the American economy works or who the super rich are.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 Much of the 1% is also the people that led their company to bankruptcy, but get paid millions of dollars in bailouts. A lot are in the financial profession where they ripped off average Americans (watch the Inside Job). And for everyone of the 1% that works those extreme hours you stated, there's thousands of Americans that work those same hours just so they can pay for their mortgage, food, etc.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@10trojan10 First of all, bailouts are supported by OWS. Do you know why? Because they support a bigger government which promotes that kind of state capitalism. It sounds like you should be promoting the Tea Party, but you lack comprehension on what OWS actually is.
There are no poor people that stay poor for long who work 5:00am to 12:00pm intelligently while furthering their financial education.
Again, you are not even an OWS supporter. You don't know what OWS is.
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 "There is no poor people that stay poor for long who work 5:00 am to 12:00 pm intelligently." Well that's just completely false. Not everyone is blessed with a college degree and they have to take any jobs to get by. I know plenty of examples where people have to take second and even third jobs just so they can make due. And I haven't hardly said anything about OWS, I'm talking about the inequality in our economy. And honestly I don't know why I'm talking to someone who believes
10trojan10 2 months ago
@10trojan10 You think you need a college degree to become rich? College degrees prepare for employment, and offer some knowledge. Bill Gates dropped out, so did many other rich people. Stop spouting your bullshit, you get no more replies from me.
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 You don't need a college degree but it helps. But your insulting millions of Americans by saying it is their fault that they are poor or middle class. You say it is because they are lazy, or don't like responsibility, or aren't intelligently working. This is not the case. You're the one spouting bullshit.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 Isn't OWS about getting more equal distribution of income and reducing the influence corporations have on politics, among others? Don't tell me I don't know what OWS is. I might not know everything but I have a basic idea, unlike you I believe.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 Then why do you practically need a PhD these days, before anyone will let you even answer a phone?
BoredomCorner 2 months ago
@BoredomCorner Are we talking about employees here? There is no such thing as a rich employee.
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 that entrepreneurs are the 1%. You really don't understand the inequality gap or the gini coefficient do you? You don't understand that America is far behind other developed countries in terms of economic fairness do you? You can't see that the middle class and lower income class is in big danger can you? Why are you against an economy that would make the middle class larger and shrink the inequality gap?
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 And I'm definitely in favor of the Tea Party. I'm more in favor of social democracy
10trojan10 2 months ago
@10trojan10 The Tea Party lost me when they started pointing guns at people who wanted affordable health care.
BoredomCorner 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 That's funny I'm pretty sure every OWS protest sign ATTACKED bailing out banks. Then again, I can read.
BoredomCorner 2 months ago
@BoredomCorner See, none of you can even comprehend what I am talking about. They do support bailouts, they are just too stupid to realize it. What does OWS support? MORE government intervention in the economy. What promotes bailouts? Corporate/state capitalism, which is when government passes legislation in favor of large corporations. Asking for more regulation encourages MORE favors to big corporations.
That's why OWS supporters are COMPLETE FOOLS
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 I think you're the only COMPLETE FOOL here
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 It's a different kind of intervention. The bailouts were rewarding bad behavior and encouraging more of it, giving them something to keep their destructive tendencies going. What the OWSers want is the gov't to stop enabling these bastards, and instead stop them. Like how a parent should discourage and punish bad behavior their child uses, like bullying, not activity encourage and further enable said behavior.
JessePrower 2 months ago
@JessePrower Read what I just wrote. OWS wants more bailouts (they don't know it but that is what they are asking for). The Tea Party doesn't want government bailouts.
Can OWS supporters not understand such a simple concept?
GracieJujitsu1 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 That's not what they want you retard. Just because you are in favor of more government intervention, doesn't mean you're in favor of bailouts. They want an economy that reduces the inequality gap. So yes, for this to happen there might (probably will) have to be more government intervention. But in no way does it mean since there is more government intervention, then there must be bailout as well. You can have government intervention without bailouts. How can you not understand
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 such a simple concept?
10trojan10 2 months ago
@GracieJujitsu1 And stop trying to say that OWS supporters should actually be for the Tea Party. The Tea Party is for the elimination of income taxes or for a flat tax rate. This happens to be something that would benefit the rich more than any other group.
10trojan10 2 months ago
@JessePrower You're explanation makes sense. But @graciejujitsu1 is incapable of understanding simple concepts. He or she doesn't/can't comprehend that there can be different types of government intervention. He/she makes the assumption that if you want government intervention, then you must be for bailouts which is completely idiotic statement to make.
10trojan10 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GracieJujitsu1 Plus, if someone is not willing to work hard, they would be fired. America needs to close the inequality gap because it's one of the biggest in the world. There is no reason for this large inequality and it will have serious consequences. Our gini coefficient is 44th worst in the world. This doesn't sound too bad, but nearly all the other "highly developed" countries/1st world countries are below us and have a much lower gini coefficient
10trojan10 2 months ago
how can you possibly blame the crisis in greece on socialism? what a nut!
khoroshoorange 3 months ago
I hope this grows b/c I want my shot at these communist revolutionary cocksuckers! I'll fucking slaughter as many as I can!
falcondriver100 3 months ago
Cenk Uygur is such a bad journalist, it is no wonder why he didnt make it on any major network, and his 48000 views shows that nobody wants to watch you! You have to show clips from Bill O'reilly's popular show, and then throw in your whinning and ranting. Stop talking nonsense , and go put your tent up with the rest of the occuputz LOSERS in a park somewhere, dueshe bag!
otherwise261 3 months ago
@otherwise261 classic republican tactic don't even debate anything he says and attack his character
TheWhiteOp 3 months ago
@TheWhiteOp What he says is liberal propaganda, he compares the occupy idiots to civil rights protests in the 1960's. He is an idiot, he has a horrible show, and thats why cnn fired him, thats why he cant get more views, and thats why he has to show Bill O'Reilly, in order to get people to watch him.
otherwise261 3 months ago
@otherwise261
you are completely right. he cuts off before Bill can say everything and besides Obama failed the economy and liberals dirty talk about FOX NEWS and blame blame blame. They think Bill O'riely is wrong and all this guy talks about is crap and if we let people like him run the country we would live in a horrible bankrupt place with lunatics everywhere
xhappyxcamperxconnor 3 months ago
@otherwise261 English is not my first language and I spell better than you, lol.. Btw - I'm from a socialist country and were doing hella lot better than the US..
nielsb90 3 months ago
@nielsb90 Your doing hella lot better? Yeah your english is great! Do us a favor and stay in your socialist country and the U.S.A is still the most prosperous and successful country in the world!
otherwise261 3 months ago
@otherwise261 Yeah that's right, because your country is #1 world-exploiter. Feel fucking proud about it, and try to forget how many people have to live in miserable conditions for every million you count.
Tuck213 3 months ago
Give it up Cenk. You'll never reach the level of Bill O'reilly; you're small time. And it's pretty fucking disgusting you brought up the civil rights movement in this piece, you intellectually dishonest left wing hack. Has nothing to do with that. This movement is clearly Anti-Capitalist in nature. These dumb fucks are not students of history and fail to see Socialism and Communism HAVE NEVER WORKED.
Pendragon1717 3 months ago
oreilly is actually 1 hundred percent true.
opiemonster 3 months ago
Guys, call O'Reilly whatever you want, he's still got the #1 cable news show on the #1 news network. I can't believe the top comments are just an absolute character assassination of Bill, which I guess is what we can expect from the liberals now that they know their President is failing miserably.
And is O'Reilly really wrong about the Occupiers? REALLY? Don't say he's trying to smear the movement, the movement has smeared themselves. They're exactly what America SHOULDN'T be!
mnfdrums 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAVID ICKE will give a lecture in Amsterdam (Netherlands) on December 10!
New information on OCCUPY, Illuminati and the total finacial chaos in the world today...
Look for his youtube video on OCCUPY!
Be there! And spread the world.. Let all people know!
This is important and world changing!
AMSTERDAM - DECEMBER 10. 2011 - DAVID ICKE - Purity Events
Tickets/More info: purityevents.nl
PurityEventsNL 3 months ago
1:45 he says "occupisers" wow he even knows his words
vivtin 3 months ago
Muslims?!! Then there must be terrorists too!!! o_0 It is new form of terrorism called Protesting! We must not let them do that! Government must keep us safe!
KBendix 3 months ago
This guy is nuts!! First, Bill and Fox News have played multiple clips from people at the protests saying that the Jews and Isreal are responcible. I found it funny how this guy never shows the clips that Bill has shown multiple times on the show. Second, many of the protestors have demanded that corporations and banks spread the wealth around so t pay for everyoones mortages, college tuitions, etc. That is what Greece, Cuba, and many European nations are doing and are about to collapse
MisterSmiley91 3 months ago
@MisterSmiley91 You do realize that the United states is only moderatly better right? You idiots have run up such a huge debt you are fucking over the entire world.
75ehwtcv 3 months ago
Bill O Reilly I love you so much! I just want to hug you so tight that your head pops off.......
thebobhollyband 3 months ago
If you can not afford to go to a prestigious university then don't go!! Unless you have a scholarship go to a jr college or a community college and I bet you will get a better education then any of these elitist professors who use a teachers aid because they are too busy to educate!!
1998disco72 3 months ago
ha bill oriely is smarter tha anyone who is dumb enough to watch this video. and they are socialits!
redsox9890 3 months ago
Bill O'Reilly is a moron who talks over people he disagrees with and throws words like ''socialist'' into the argument to insight fear in his right wing viewers who, sadly, probably don't know what socialist means, yet foam at the mouth when they hear it.
The reason Bill uses these tactics is because he doesn't want the debate to reach it's logical conclusion.
In other words, he doesn't want to lose a debate on national television and be made to look like the fool he is.
ec123456789able 3 months ago 31
@ec123456789able - first off bill o has had the #1 cable news show for like 12 years straight, you cannot dominate like that with just right wing viewers, it takes a large base of people on the right,left, and middle to produce the numbers he is so just right there your pretty much a moron, 2ndly an overwhelming majority of people do know what socialist gov. is ... AND WE DONT FUCKING WANT IT !
kos22us 3 months ago
@kos22us Bill O is another shitstain on America that pukes like you deserve. Let these corporate mouth pieces run your patheic life from cradle to grave. Republicans are the shitstains on America that have little bitty thoughts with big bank accounts. R U 1`of these Wall Street cocksuckers 2? Social Security, Medicare, Medicade, and agriculture subsidies are socialism you fucking dumbass. And can we not call giving millionares and billionares 75% of all the Bush tax cuts a form of socialism.
teabaggersblow 3 months ago
@kos22us Only 3% of viewers of The O'Reilly Factor identify as liberal, the other 97% identify as conservative, so yes, he is only on TV because the right-wing watch him.
Just because someone objects to corporatism and economic unfairness does not mean they are a socialist, I believe in a free market, however the current system is elitist. Just as elitist as communism as a matter of fact.
There needs to be more regulation on the banks and currency, whilst maintaining economic libertarianism.
ec123456789able 3 months ago
@ec123456789able bill is right and the rest of america agrees with him thats why he has more viewers then anyone the Occupied people are a bunch of commie,socialist look at the signs and the rape free zones and the deaths that have happen and i didnt get that from fox i and you can get online and see what these cowards are all about 22% of the people want nothing to do with you commie bitches ''''''LONG LIVE FOX NEWS AND THE TEA PARTY
<