Hi. I was at BarCamp today and you said you'd like some honest feedback, so here goes... For a 4-minute film it took more than a minute (25% of the time) to get interesting. Wasn't very interesting the first minute or so. With that said, it was wonderfully shot. Great camera work, good camera positioning, nice. Story just lacked -- especially at the beginning. Looked professional though.
Thank you for your feedback. This was an experiment project for me. Actually, the villain is introduced within the first thirty seconds and a total of three times with-in the first sixty seconds. I wanted there to be hidden elements that the viewer might not catch the first or even second time.
Hi. I was at BarCamp today and you said you'd like some honest feedback, so here goes... For a 4-minute film it took more than a minute (25% of the time) to get interesting. Wasn't very interesting the first minute or so. With that said, it was wonderfully shot. Great camera work, good camera positioning, nice. Story just lacked -- especially at the beginning. Looked professional though.
chrisr214 3 years ago
Thank you for your feedback. This was an experiment project for me. Actually, the villain is introduced within the first thirty seconds and a total of three times with-in the first sixty seconds. I wanted there to be hidden elements that the viewer might not catch the first or even second time.
furmanpictures 3 years ago