have you slowed down the video ?
if not, then you have a very inefficient way of doing it
yoanar2 1 month ago
@yoanar2 He/she is probably not doing dynamic programming. He's probably not caching the results.
crompound 1 month ago
There is an error in this demonstration, I am using recursion in Python, but if we omit that, again is the fastest
alfonsodelaguarda 1 year ago
verry interesting its kinda hard to read your screen but which one preformed better?
samrudoff 1 year ago
@samrudoff It says (in spanish) that Ruby 1.9.1 performs better than both (?) Python versions when is alone in the CPU. It also says: "You should trow in the garbage Ruby 1.8 now !"
butthefollowing 1 year ago
@butthefollowing thank you for the translation you are a very helpful individual
have you slowed down the video ?
if not, then you have a very inefficient way of doing it
yoanar2 1 month ago
@yoanar2 He/she is probably not doing dynamic programming. He's probably not caching the results.
crompound 1 month ago
There is an error in this demonstration, I am using recursion in Python, but if we omit that, again is the fastest
alfonsodelaguarda 1 year ago
verry interesting its kinda hard to read your screen but which one preformed better?
samrudoff 1 year ago
@samrudoff It says (in spanish) that Ruby 1.9.1 performs better than both (?) Python versions when is alone in the CPU. It also says: "You should trow in the garbage Ruby 1.8 now !"
butthefollowing 1 year ago
@butthefollowing thank you for the translation you are a very helpful individual
samrudoff 1 year ago