Added: 2 years ago
From: BFROVIDEOS
Views: 38,896
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • interesting!!!!!!!!!

  • most people have elbows, but not everyone......

  • Yep Twisted I just saw the show where they exactly recreated this footage by having a guy crawl on all 4s. Another hoax exposed!

  • Wpepoon-----hahaha well said!

  • cool

  • looks liek a skinnyguy lol

  • Wasn't this footage proved to be hoaxed by Greene on the Finding Bigfoot show ?

  • @Twisted426 Nope. Contraire.

  • Lame, but good to see fat guys interested in something other than Nascar...

  • Hi Matt I live in Arizona where there were several sightings of a skunk ape and I wanted to offer you and your team a place to stay . I have an Rv that is fully self contained and it will allow you and your team a place to stay for as long as you would like let me know thanks

  • Hi May

  • This is looney. $2. Moneymaker can't even defend the video's he promotes as real. The PG film is full of naked people. His opinion is worthless. The "Greene Method" is not new. Others have put out sweets for lures. LOL. Seymourbbest is correct - not one piece of evidence exists that proves Sasquatch is real. Even the sound MM supposedly recorded in Ohio proves it wasn't a bigfoot. It was a two tone siren! LOL Stick around MM - we need a good laugh.

  • i Camp about 3 miles from where the footage was taken in Uwharrie, 5 yrs ago something was messing with us by throwing a beer bottle toward or camp. we were in a spot that nobody knows about and cant get to but one way in. nobody was there when we got lights onto where the shit came from. not claiming it was the bf, but uwharrie is a crazy ass place

  • bigfoot doesnt exist ..get over it ppl.

  • @nastymonsters2 And stones can't possibly fall from the sky. Look up... do you see any stones? See, it's true! Stones can't possibly fall from the sky! That's what they said in the middle ages. What are metoerites?

  • the human shines brighter because he doesn't have any insulation and all of his heat is visiable. The alleged bigfoot would have hair that would act as an insulator. I've worked with thermal.

  • @campcomp00 good point

  • Every piece of the puzzle matters. I hope a big male SAS never steps out in the woods in front of you non-believers :) big surprise when it happens. That's not shaky or out of focus AT ALL.. it's FLIR on a tripod and the person who took it left zagnut bar as bait, then left the scene, a while later the FLIR captured the sneaky SAS taking the candy bar..... simple as that.

  • @bigfootresearch Or, a more plausable explanation, the whole thign was set up and its all fake like every other bigfoot viseo.

  • Why are all Bigfoot videos only 2 seconds long? oh, thats right, ran out of film. Then why is it that everyone who films a Bigfoot has only 2 seconds of film left in the camera?

  • @Rabarx they must all own the roger patterson sasquatch model of camera with built in extra shaky out of focus mode.that shows bugger all. this is nothing more than green filming himself with all th settings turned up on the thermal.even the trees are glowing.just another money making con form him.this guy was charging to view it every time..so if your paid and it didnt download you had to pay again.lol..CONMEN and nothing more ,moneymaker suits his name.

  • Is it a man?

    A bigfoot?

    A man pretending to be bigfoot?

    Can't tell by anything in this.

  • @bluestarbuckscup Most likely distance from the camera. when closer to a thermal camera, it can still pick up the heat coming off your body and adjusts the picture according to that. all in all this just looks like SOMETHING in the distance.

  • conman making money off idiots..

  • There should be tons more thermal videos of bigfoot since this was filmed. Thermal spells the end of the mystery.

  • why not put a heavy sedative in the candy bar????

  • @waverider51 exactly....idiots

  • The NC Zoo boarders the Uwharrie National Forest. I heard a few years ago a male African Gorilla escaped. To me, if you look close, it looks like a male gorilla standing on all fours when it reaches for the candy. Especially with the way it has the dome shaped head. One thing I noticed too, I believe it to be at least some animal because of the efficiency of it's fur holding in the body heat. Look at the way the human comaprison "glows" with lost heat. The "BF" image isn't as bright.

  • @rodmauldin

    It would seem very unlikely that a gorilla could survive long in this environment. They are creatures of the tropics, and require specific vegetation for food. A gorilla would have perished in a few weeks or months, this isn't a gorilla.

  • Looks like a guy.

  • turn the settings up all the way.as someone has posted. mike greene lol. money maker. on a par with biscardi.

  • It's strange, the form looks human, but why'd a human be out in the cold woods? 

  • He had the low end temperature settings on the thermal cranked up so high that even the trees were glowing white hot. Either he was doing it on purpose, or he did not know how to use the thermal settings correctly.

  • its big bob H in another suit..what it isnt is bigfoot..

  • Comment removed

  • doesn't look quite right...

  • pretty much it looks like two of them

  • I bought the video as well. It's intriguing. I just don't understand why, if he set some food out for the beast to eat would he not have zoomed the camera in a little closer. There isn't enough detail. I understand thermal cameras don't have extreme detail but it would have been better than what he got on this video. It's still good work. I too think that this technique of leaving for a couple hours with the camera rolling is a good idea.

  • So you admit there is no "solid proof" of Bigfoot. Thank you. My work here is done.

  • @Comments SSSHHHHHHHH!!!....I'm trying to watch videos.

  • I think you've missed the point of the comment section. You're free to post your opinion, I'm free to post mine. Simple really. Yeah I've been banned by PostToastie and a couple of other spineless duds. If they can't stand someone asking for proof then they've no business making crazy claims.

  • @seymourbbest I agree. I was banned by one pathetic looser of a user after trying to post ONE message. All I said was that I didn't see anything that looked supernatural in the video (I was even more or less polite about it). I got a "message needs to be approved" notice and then next day when I checked the thread - no post of mine, and when I tried to make another post I found out I was banned. If people can't take two sides of a discussion they should just hide in their basement and whimper.

  • @seymourbbest There is no proof yet - only evidence. So, why ask for the proof if you know it's not possible yet? People who post videos like this will usually say up front that it is not being presented as proof. Is there something about that you don't understand?

  • Yeah god forbid anyone should ask any of you Bigfooters for some proof of what you claim. The word "proof" is like poison to you guys,isn't it? Anyone who asks for proof is banned from posting-big deal. But what does banning opposing viewpoints say about your spine? It says you aint got one.

  • Yeah send this guy some money to watch him walk around in front of his thermal imaging camera.So is this gonna be the extent of Bigfoot "proof"--thermal images and blurry video blobs?

  • Interesting but inconclusive.

  • @LavertyPrint It has the perfect silhouette of a bigfoot. The posture, the build, the shape of the head.

  • That's why it's interesting and could very well be a bigfoot. But it's not impossible that someone hoaxed this. All you would need to do is have a costume that, apart from the head shape, wouldn't have to be detailed. Then you have the costume heated up, put it on, voila. Do I think that's probable...who knows? But it's possible.

  • @LavertyPrint It's pretty cold at night in the woods. It seems unlikely that a costume could maintain a constant level of heat in such conditions.

    I guess it is somewhat probable, but if someone go through so much trouble to do something like that, they would have made a better video. The bigfoot would have gone more out in the open, there would be more footage.

  • @tehUBERn00blet It would be a great idea to do some testing to see how long a suit could retain heat. Also, if it is a guy in some get up who's to say he (or she) wouldn't have done it this way. If they paraded out too much maybe they thought it would be suspicious. The bottom line is...this footage, as interesting as it is, is never going to be viewed by scientists as conclusive proof that it's a bigfoot, since, as you agree, it could possibly be a human.

  • I bought the video and it seems real enough to me. I'm not an expert so I can't definitively say what's in that video, but I don't have any reason to suspect it's not a sasquatch.

  • its a person.

  • wouldnt say the movment wasnt human like their wasnt enough detail to tell.

    what if you had a suit that was battery powerd to create heat. you know like a heating pad,that could stand out on infred also. not saying the film is fake im just saying

  • Im thinking about buying the video. Anyone know how good the quality is tho?? I dont want to pay for something that is a 320x240, low resolution, pixely crap video. If its decent quality Ill buy it tho..

  • well I bought the video. It seems legit. The movement is deff not human like. I dont want to disclose too much info tho. You'll have to view it yourselves..

  • yeah, look at the size of the mans head and then look at the size of the bigfoots head. the mans head is more rounded while the bigfoot's head has a typical cone/pointed charactoristic to its head.

  • dont matter the bigfoot was fuckin swole like and ape that dude is wayy to skinny.

  • Why is the image in the "Comparison" so much sharper?

    I also agree with the other posts...what good is this if the camera is placed in a different location/angle. If this is a scientific approach, shouldn't the guy know that?

    Puts the original footage in suspect

  • @glane010 Sure it might seem that way -- Did you read why the original video was blurry? He says on his website he left the camera, forgetting to re-focus which I can see as a legit issue. Who remembers to "focus" these days? Stuff just auto-focuses itsself whenever you zoom. Know what I mean?

    Without giving away too much info, the movement of the creature in question is very ape-like in its swaying back and forth behind the tree(s) IMO.

  • two different angles, i agree, he should have stood in the same spot and should have been the same camera angle.

  • Why didn't he stand in the same spot at the same distance from the camera? This is not very helpful.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more