2011 Ford F-150 Ecoboost Does A Nice Burnout

[Harvey238]

Ford needs to use the ecoboost technology on a v8 and put it in a car that would be bad ass

[tracknfield01]

Solid

[flakio2012]

i dont fucking care how many turbos this p.os. has on it,but is to fricking weak ,anyfricking tacoma will do the same thing,and the gmc cyclon will rape this truck on a quarter mile

[1SirCarlton]

@flakio2012 you're comparing a performance sport truck to a normal work truck.... yeaaah thats what the SVT Lightning is for buddy. must not be too weak if its running low to mid 15s in the quarter..... ~facepalm~

[MrTruckguy420]

@flakio2012

You are a true idiot! Crawl back into your hole, TROLL!

[flakio2012]

@MrTruckguy420 hahahahahahahaah why you so upset??couse a said the truth,well i don fucking care,i still rather drive my tacoma than your piece of shit ecobooshit

[ajd157]

YAYYYYY too quite.

[tbirdsport302]

I would be torn between buying an Ecoboost...or a 5.0 and then Supercharging it :) Buut, the milage would be nice with the Ecoboost

[adamkingsho]

that electric truck ?

[uploaded113redone]

@adamkingsho its a ford f150 built like a prius with balls

[PhatsoJuggalo806]

@adamkingsho V6 Twin turbo.

[mountaindrewbc]

Ecoboost + burnout = Eco Fail

[fivepointohpwr]

its weird not hearing any exhaust noise..

[jihadjared]

@fivepointohpwr That's because the ecoboost engine provides a significant amount of torque at under 3500 RPM. It doesn't have to rev up like other weaker engines do. It already has the power instantly available.

[GreenTeaLSD]

buggin out! yah! FORD ALL THE WAY

[TheMrSauers]

Very nice! I work for Ford and have to say they hit it head on with the TT 3.5

[TheWeavert92]

so this is totally at texas motor speedway

[SALLENS7TWINTURBO]

"It's Not The Tires Screaming, Its The Asphalt."

[WOAHthatwascool]

I have to say I never will get a truck with a V6, partly for nostalgia and mostly for the noise/low end torque of a V8.  Quite obviously the EcoBoost V6 can hold its own.

But you just can’t beat the power and fuel economy of a good PowerStroke diesel!! So that’s where I’ll stay.

[rubyspaceship1o1]

damn sounds like a banshee.

[jason123456789210]

get V8. V6 is shit and that truck is slow as shit.

[tang347]

@jason123456789210 LOL...you have no idea what you're talking about

[jason123456789210]

@tang347 that thing's got a V6. put a shitload of shit in the bed and it can't move. same with the I4 taurus and explorer, load them up, it can't move.

[Boother4]

@jason123456789210 400ft lbs of torque, it will move!

[jason123456789210]

@Boother4 i still think V6 is too shit for this

[SknnyDan]

@jason123456789210

it will move, with 365 horsepower and 420 lb-ft of torque, it doesnt matter if its a v6, it will MOVE. and these pickups with this motor will actually out pull the 5.7 hemi.

[jason123456789210]

@SknnyDan now i like this truck it's got V6 with power of V8 and fuel economy of I4

[McWeslyF1]

@jason123456789210 next gen EcoBoost (2020) will have "the power of V12 and fuel economy of l3''

[ThePantyDroper]

@jason123456789210 I tow 6000 lbs effortlessly with my 3.7 V6 4x4....

[jason123456789210]

@ThePantyDroper fuck

[jesseleerich]

@jason123456789210 Really? And where do you get your info from? There's no 4 cyl taurus. And both the explorer eco boost and f150 eco boost have more torque than their larger engine options. You can load them up. And they will move.

[jason123456789210]

@jesseleerich there is a 4 cyl taurus but it only comes out spring 2012

[danielforbes241481]

@jesseleerich Ah yes there is. Its also an ecoboost turbo charged 2L 230 horsepower and 240lb/ft of torque. Comes in the focus, fusion, tauris, Falcon, and the explorer.

[rider4life51]

@danielforbes241481 this ecoboost has over 400tq and over 350 hp this is not the same enging in the fusion, taurus or focus

[JeebusBlarth]

@jason123456789210 it out pulls all other motors for a truck this size 11,300 lbs

[davidworkman9]

@jason123456789210 LOL fastest 1/2 ton truck on the market.

[openshot]

lol my friend says his chevy truck with the weak 5.3 can do better but never does one but i love the ford trucks

[hamd101aa]

Wow!! I mean, holy gee willickers, sunshine. I used to be able to do that in my POS '73 Ford Maverick. And the point of this video is??

[elchicoboy]

lol sounds like the the truck has two chicks having orgasms in those tires....

[form109]

Love that Ecoboost V6..it's got V8 Power!

[dills2403]

better watch out rthose trannys are weak lol

[coltonspaugh2]

clorox??? ahhah the smoke was yellow

[mustang4sho]

well the only problem with TT vechiles is going to be the maintence adn not to many people will be able to do "at home work on these trucks" They will make a killing of maintence once your warraties run out..a fkin killing. nice idea though

[denny099999999]

@mustang4sho straight up everone thinks this motor is so great because of the torture test but little do they know the eco-boost only drove 4k miles on road and the rest of 156k miles was done on a dyno. thats no way to test a vehicle and as for that motor having equal10 years of abuse... yes but 10 years of abuse actually takes 10 years. a 10 year old engine has already starting corroding which starts taking away the durability of motors. but either way is a killer motor.

[billydoss8]

WOW ANY ONE CAN BRAKE STAND

[victortsoi052000]

ecoboost is eco, but not the burnouts lol

[happyninslave]

My F150 SuperCrew TwinTurbo will be ready in 6-8 weeks. =)

[stopscrewingaround11]

@happyninslave mine too, end of sept!

[happyninslave]

@stopscrewingaround11 We are close together, mine should arive in less than a month!!

[AllAlaskan907]

If Ford Was smart they would also make this engine available for the Ford Ranger and Keep the Ranger in Its line up, I know I would sure as hell grab a 3.5L Twin Turbo'd Ranger!

[TNT0403]

@AllAlaskan907 Too bad the discontinued the Ranger.

[AllAlaskan907]

@TNT0403 Ya I know :(

[NathansBackwoods]

I want a standard cab short box with an ecoboost v6, but no you cant have a 3.5 in a standard cab short box....WTF???

[raydulce]

How can this truck do a burnout? It has 'brake over accelerator' junk... You try to power brake, and the computer cuts the engine out!

[bsharporbflat]

@raydulce You can turn off the traction-control, you normally turn it off for heavy snow or mud driving (with it on you wont go anywhere) but you can also turn it off to do smoke shows and get your tire dealer all worked up.

[raydulce]

@bsharporbflat I believe "Brake Over Accelerator" is separate from traction and stability control. You can disable traction and stability (Advancetrac), but there is no way to disable the brake vs accelerator battle...

[bsharporbflat]

@raydulce The brake over accelerator is disabled when you disable de traction control but anyway I own a 2011 Ecoboost and I don't have BOA , this feature was available only on 6.7 diesel F250 this year, so this guy doesn't have it either.

[getalife04]

Anyone else ever notice that ford is making ecoboost motors to increase gas mileage on their cars yet everyone drives them like they stole them? Therefore killing all their hard work to achieve higher mpg's lol.

[91slownotch]

@getalife04 Now that you say that, I got passed the other day by a guy driving a Prius doing about 90 mph. Just shook my head thinking, dude, your not getting it!

[getalife04]

@91slownotch Yep see, and I bet that dude wasn't getting shit for mileage driving that fast. Electric car or not the faster you go the more fuel/charge you use. It's just that simple lol.

[Jason1Pa]

Those tires really make a lot of smoke!!!

[imjustwonderful]

how about ecoboostin' the 6.2L?

[petorian1]

kinda sad that it on;y gets 22mpg with the 3.5 eco boost and 4x2 cuz the new silverados get 22mpg with the 5.3 v8 and 4x2 hmmm who wins?

[cheezgrated]

@petorian1 The Ford EcoBoost has 360 hp, and 420 ft-lb torque at a very low 2500 rpm. The 5.3 Vortec V8 provides only 326 hp, and 348 ft-lb torque at 4400 rpm. For the same fuel economy, the Ford motor has a lot more twist available at much lower engine speed.

[krisweeerd]

@petorian1 Ford does no shit dumbass

[kjwade]

@petorian1 I love my sierra.. but it doesnt actually get 22mpg... I cant speak for the f150 of course but just saying

[omega190e]

twin turbo... i can already see this is going to be junk.

[burnem94]

is that the 3.5 twin turbo?

[HighGearMediaVideos]

@burnem94 Yup

[TheDonkyPuncher]

@HighGearMediaVideos what kind of fuel economy are you getting with this truck? also have you run into any problems with the motor or turbos.

[cdawg4391]

@burnem94 It is



[1999z71silverado]

fx2 is so pointless

[bezzle67]

@1999z71silverado that's like saying anything 2 wheel drive is pointless. some people want the luxury items of an fx4 but they don't need or cant afford the four wheel drive.

[1999z71silverado]

@bezzle67 well 4x4s can be used in 2wd, u never know when ur gonna need 4wd and if u cant afford 4wd thts ok but ur probably not getting an ecoboost offroad package truck

[bezzle67]

@1999z71silverado why not? same power, more torque all across the rpm range, lighter, more fuel efficient... sounds better to me. That all that torque will help especially.

[1999z71silverado]

@bezzle67 what im saying is if u cant afford a 4x4 ecoboost then ur probably not going to get and ecoboost offroad package. ur most likely just going to by a 2wd drive truck with the ecoboost in it.

[bezzle67]

@1999z71silverado so then you get the fx2, making it not pointless. Near identical looks to an fx4 but with 2 wheel drive. Also, the first sentence of ur last comment is redundant. If you can't afford a 4x4 ecoboost XL, you clearly can't afford an ecoboost FX4. Another thing is that some people want a truck but also good fuel economy. i.e. ecoboost 4x2 = 22 hwy mpg while ecoboost 4x4 ~19 hwy mpg. BAM! mind, blown.

[openshot]

lol i would like to see my friends chevy truck try that with out braking

[adamberg666]

Good now swap out those stock turbos with a couple 80mm's

[Dereks06]

@adamberg666 The current ones are limited to something like 6 psi by the computer. No need for new turbos just chip it. Chipping the ecoboost motor should have the same effect as when someone chips their turbodiesel truck - like adding another motor.

[HaloSpartan86]

haha i have an 02 expedition 5.4 its slow as shit but its got more torque than ill ever need. still envious of these ecoboosts

[codyshmody]

@xterrasesc we have a 2010 5.4 and it actually puts out alot. It will smoke a chevy or dodge but yeah the ecoboost is way better. Don't underestimate the 5.4 though

[Stickman53fe]

Hey Ford, how about an Ecoboost Coyote 5.0?

[smpstech]

@Stickman53fe its rumored that the harley-davidson edition sometime in the future may have a 5.0L "road runner" using the same twin turbo concept as the ecoboost, but not officially an ecoboost engine as it does not feature direct injection.

[motocrosser59]

@Stickman53fe i heard there might be an ecoboost 5.0 coming for the mustang in the next year or two but again thats just what i heard.

[denny099999999]

@motocrosser59 this 5.0 ecoboost is sposed to be a 5.0 "road-runner" Codenamed Road Runner, it is rumored to be a 500 hp engine to be used in the 2012 Shelby GT500 and F-150 Harley-Davidson edition pickups. but is not to be shared in the eco-boost family because it doesnt have direct injection. they made a bobcat 5.0 dual fuel in 2010 but have not released anything

[cesarc9276]

@Stickman53fe be wonderful FORD

[cb7pwn]

smoky :DD

[xterrasesc]

the 5.4 litre is such a piece of shit compared to these new engines ford has out.

[points2shopPROOF]

where is the single cab version!@

[88soulsurvivor]

@points2shopPROOF A coworker of mine has a single cab and that thing is HUGE!!! very roomy.

[points2shopPROOF]

@88soulsurvivor but does it have an ecoboost or 5.0 engine?

[88soulsurvivor]

@points2shopPROOF 5.0 I think, but the ecoboost pulls better I think.

[TheVideoExtremist]

@points2shopPROOF singe cab Ecoboost would be an epic new (Lightning)

[c0m9k66]

whats the 0-60 on the new ecoboost 2011 f150

[alore57]

@c0m9k66 prob mid 6 to low 7

[rangeranger91]

what is the average fuel economy on the 2011 3.5 liter eco boost...and has anyone drove this truck yet..if so what do u think about it im gonna go test drive me one of em when in get a chance...i want to know what to expect from it so far i love this truck!!!

[NSguy07]

@rangeranger91 16/22. I got to drive one about a month ago and the truck is a beast! You barely need to touch the gas pedal at all. The six speed tranny also let it "breeze" down the highway at about 70 MPH no problem.

[gethigh360]

lame



[ford4life99]

Join forums at EcoboostFseries{dot)com

[undertake782]

It's that low end torque they always talk about.

[kgshitman]

The twin turbos in the eco boost models all do the same thing, one turbo is for lower rpms and the other picks up where it leaves off with some kind of waste gate.

[QuattroStig]

@kgshitman

That's incorrect they are parallel turbos. Both turbos function at the identical efficiency range.

[scizot12]

nice! how do you like the twin turbo setup? and do you kno if they are sequential turbos? and what kind of boost do they make?

[dodgerider26]

@scizot12 This YT channel is a media outlet, not an EcoBoost owner. It's a similar engine as used in the Taurus SHO so there's plenty of info about it already. What I read from Fords website about the F150 though says it has higher boost, ball bearing turbos which are water-cooled, it's twin turbo but I don't think they are sequential. They are not really high boost though. They go for peak torque in the 1500-4000 rpm range because it's a truck engine.

[HighGearMediaVideos]

@dodgerider26 Thanks! Got to the question before us...

[Zinizzle]

do you know what the fuel economy estimates for the 5.0 are?

[HighGearMediaVideos]

@Zinizzle still TBD

[ADD8oi]

@Zinizzle expect in the 20s, we have a 6.2L which is averaging 25mpg

[pfun41]

@ADD8oi wait,WHAT!?

[ADD8oi]

@pfun41 the new f150s are getting really really good fuel economy ccause of fords new engine designs, my '11 6.2 lariat is geting 24.6mpg under normal driving, aka not when my foot is stuck to the floor which is very tempting with the power of the truck

[xoquixxoqafxo]

@Zinizzle

well according to my sticker price on a 2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 with the 5.0L V8 its 14/19. Hopefully the ecoboost will be able to break 20 on the highway

[vrod03100]

@Zinizzle 18city and 25highway i believe.

[NSguy07]

@Zinizzle 15/21



[bezzle67]

@Zinizzle 22 hwy i believe. 22 hwy as well for the ecoboost. 23 hwy for the 3.7l v6.

[stevensjustin87]

@Zinizzle they are goin to put a 5.0 in an f150?

[Zinizzle]

@stevensjustin87 The new F150s use the same Mustang 5.0 just tweaked a little. It replaced the 5.4Triton.

[ebayluis23]

@stevensjustin87 They already did

[daltonabc]

@Zinizzle

19 mpg city and 26 mpg highway

[Ls7colorado]

That was quite a strain .... very poor soory

[ashtrey05]

@Ls7colorado you are just not used to it being so quite. I had to watch it again..It was spinning out the whole way. And I am sure they aren't going to slam the throttle, rather ease into it.

[strumem90]

@Ls7colorado like your spelling eh?

[Ls7colorado]

@strumem90 I have very shitty spelling thanks for noticing

[strumem90]

@Ls7colorado Welcome :)

[mak450]

@BloodyNeighbor

Nah its your reasoning thats flawed. I said exhaust note, you can throw engine noise in there too. But removing sound deadening would only open you up to wind and tire noise and drone. Are you telling me you don't know anyone who just likes the way their car sounds and bought it with that being a factor? Cause I know a whole crapload of people who do. All you're talking about is poseurs, and you aren't much better than them if you write off everyone with a louder car as one.

[peteandlisa]

Jjults 371 - get a life dude -That's not just anybody doing that burn out - thats TJ baby - TEEE JAYYYY

[jshults371]

big WOW.... Anyone can do a brake burnout...

[MercuryMorrison1]

@BloodyNeighbor And the 6.2L managed better mileage when towing. And the 5.0L was within a mile per gallon of the 3.5L Ecoboost highway. But instead of debating which is better I'm just glad that Ford has some gas engines in the F-150 that now put them ahead of all the competition. They have not beating their competition this bad since the mid 1990s.

[MercuryMorrison1]

@BloodyNeighbor 3.7L V6 0-30 = 2.17 sec 0-60 = 9.07 sec 5.0L V8 0-30 = 2.72 sec (Lots of wheel spin) 0-60 = 7.38 sec 3.5L Ecoboost 0-30 = 2.74 sec 0-60 = 6.82 sec 6.2L 0-30 = 2.84 sec 0-60 = 7.15 sec

[MercuryMorrison1]

@BloodyNeighbor Not necessarily. And I'm not disagreeing with you just to disagree.But now that some road tests has gotten out has done one of the first real drives with all 4 of Fords new engines. And when towing the Ecoboost only managed 8-9 mpg, And was only a few tenths of a second faster than the 5.0L and 6.2L to 60mph I will post the times up so you can see them.

[stopscrewingaround11]

make it sound like a V8 and I'm sold. 

[MercuryMorrison1]

@BloodyNeighbor Hey I want exhaust sound to. And that's what the new 5.0L and 6.2L V8's are for. You don't HAVE to buy an Ecoboost.

[andyvega31105]

man i dont care if u cant hear the exhaust this shit is strong

[iamsuperbleeder]

my 2010 can do it too, and it's V8 sounds better in the process :)

[mak450]

@BloodyNeighbor So you're both a doctor and a statistician who's had enough experience treating ED to create a distribution that suggests that having an engine in a truck that sounds like something means you have ED? Course you aren't, you just like worn out cliches.

Anyway if you think just having an exhaust note is the mark of someone trying to showoff, you've got your own issues to work out.

[AliGhanizad]

not a big fan of fords and any trucks but I have to say the the the F-150 is very good but the best truck i have ever seen is the F-350, that thing is just a monster.

[yerthrower]

I'd like to be there

[mak450]

just a shame it doesn't really sound like anything

[msts20189]

My ears!

[T67GS300]

Sweet

[DackIsBack]

Oh Yeah... But can it DRIFT?