Everyone who said this sucks should be severely beaten and shot. This man is an absolute genius. Even though it may differ from the 1900's version, it's still amazing!
Well, I first heard it from the 1900 film clip. This is a different, and I guess, more original interpretation. Glad he mentioned the "spanish tinge" at the beginning. When i first heard it i thought it sounded a bit like tango,
Wow I didn't believe there would be so many coming on here saying this version sucks just because of what they've heard is different. This is very close to how the piece was originally meant, the 1900 film version is not. I think this is a fantastic performance, very passionate.
@Lortagreb I actually like this version better than the one that was used at legend of 1900. this one seems more real, as you said yourself, very passionate.
Hello , I saw your Comment , I have the score from Crave , if you want you can your email address write back to me and I send you the Score. Best regards.
Very inspiring, Frank. Like apples and oranges this rendition is very different, blockier then others, yet that allows it to have a swagger to it. Bravo, Frank!
I think he did it very well. his tempo was on top of it all though its a great piece to go a little faster and to put a little flavor in the left hand. I wish I had a camera.
I absolutely agree, this play of the Crave really sux. No brilliancy at all. I can't reallt feel the music. It's just a set of separate technical fragments
That is sooo awesome. I spent quite a bit of time in the joint and there use to be an old man that played this song for me every time I would walk into the rec. Anyway thanks for bringing it all back for a few moments.
This looks like it would be alot of fun to play. I like the embellishments giving it your own flavor. Suddenly I'm craving something delicious. Thx for posting. 5*
his posture looks like Schroeder XDDD
alicehsuyaju 7 months ago
FANTASTIC!
op66kimo 7 months ago
I never heard this version...Jelly Roll Morton wrote this? Or The Legend of 1900's version is the REAL Jelly Roll Morton original version?
Makenor13 7 months ago
where can I get the tabs??
levanigola 8 months ago
does anyone have the sheets of this version?
becausetheskyisbluee 8 months ago
Excellent interpretation. Most play this far too fast and miss the notes.
Wonderful.
hominisbohemian 11 months ago
As always, your artistry is magnificent.-- Lois RTS News
barefootbaby1978 1 year ago
its very well. because its like the original, but i prefer the verion of ennio morricone
Estoyporlapaz 1 year ago
Everyone who said this sucks should be severely beaten and shot. This man is an absolute genius. Even though it may differ from the 1900's version, it's still amazing!
ReoTheYokel 1 year ago
awesome, dude
MrChopiliszt 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrChopiliszt 1 year ago
Excellent version, stayed faithful to the original.
Gemr0d 1 year ago
slow~
dimitri356 1 year ago
one the fo
Annnnn030 1 year ago
too slow!!! OUT
TheOthersProd 1 year ago
@TheOthersProd I'm afraid You should try disco section.
viemsz 1 year ago
I love what you did with the dynamics in this piece, Frankfrench. Excellent! Inspirational! :)
Ron.
( ;-} >
moonpagan 1 year ago
beautiful rendition. but why does the 1900 version sound more boombastic?
amitnewyork 1 year ago
it's very good, but I prefer the version from 'The legend of 1900'
Estoyporlapaz 1 year ago
I love this song. Very tasteful interpretation.
UFeaster1978 1 year ago
Well, I first heard it from the 1900 film clip. This is a different, and I guess, more original interpretation. Glad he mentioned the "spanish tinge" at the beginning. When i first heard it i thought it sounded a bit like tango,
arp1978 2 years ago
Wow I didn't believe there would be so many coming on here saying this version sucks just because of what they've heard is different. This is very close to how the piece was originally meant, the 1900 film version is not. I think this is a fantastic performance, very passionate.
Lortagreb 2 years ago 20
@Lortagreb I actually like this version better than the one that was used at legend of 1900. this one seems more real, as you said yourself, very passionate.
unit2224 5 months ago
Very pro , nice !
ZekBlek 2 years ago
Now this has some attitude! Nice and slow, but still beautifully syncopated. Well done. :)
PeacfulJoh 2 years ago 19
@PeacfulJoh you are right attitude is exactly the word i was thinking about
fedeymini 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he really.... sucks
justinneversleep 2 years ago
a bit too slow for my taste...but verry good
cercetasul 2 years ago 2
hats off! marvellous performance: you never hide the rhythm of the bass part and the tempo is so ... just-first-century.
I'd love to play this piece too: would you send me the partition?
spirisi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you suck....
nikolabi1 2 years ago
That was a great performance, really close to original 1939 piece...
lostparadigms 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
е...ть гавно, испортил произведение :/ он хоть слышал как его играют ? У него получился не джаз, а произведение для 4 класса муз школы
DelMadman 2 years ago
Good job Frank the orgenal 1900 vershon rules and the legend vershon is very cool to .
ilove1994 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
this version fucking sucks.
ibiketx 2 years ago
Comment removed
wallhalla64 2 years ago
Your chords are so stiff, you're popping off them instead of letting them resonate, and you need to drag out the trills.. It's way too jumpy..
Dstrukt2k2 2 years ago
He meant them to be stiff obviously, to give it attitude and whatnot. Silence is more important than reverberation in music.
Lortagreb 2 years ago
i love this music
could you give me the sheet partition of the crave please ???
Deeelphine 3 years ago
Hello , I saw your Comment , I have the score from Crave , if you want you can your email address write back to me and I send you the Score. Best regards.
aryanpianist 2 years ago
Very inspiring, Frank. Like apples and oranges this rendition is very different, blockier then others, yet that allows it to have a swagger to it. Bravo, Frank!
Ron.( ;-} >
moonpagan 3 years ago 2
i liked it very much but in the end its sounded weird. can anyone please watch my performances? thx
jazzkosova 3 years ago
the music feels a bit stiff, maybe letting his fingers dance a bit will help.
saizni 3 years ago
I think he did it very well. his tempo was on top of it all though its a great piece to go a little faster and to put a little flavor in the left hand. I wish I had a camera.
Dontbustthecrust 3 years ago
so much talking, just play already!
PsychoSuo9000 3 years ago
Somebody had fun with the "Windows Movie Maker"
Morahman7vnNo2 3 years ago 3
i like this tempo.
Lekeeon 3 years ago 2
I absolutely agree, this play of the Crave really sux. No brilliancy at all. I can't reallt feel the music. It's just a set of separate technical fragments
tkachenich 3 years ago
omg hedoesen't play it well at all =)) sry guyz but this guy sux, or he feels the music to much =)))
maxy4shade 3 years ago
Wow, that is beautiful! :P
fullmoonnite 3 years ago
That is sooo awesome. I spent quite a bit of time in the joint and there use to be an old man that played this song for me every time I would walk into the rec. Anyway thanks for bringing it all back for a few moments.
dellee69 3 years ago 2
This looks like it would be alot of fun to play. I like the embellishments giving it your own flavor. Suddenly I'm craving something delicious. Thx for posting. 5*
idasynco 3 years ago
A fine live performance, Frank! I hope you will soon post others.
badibadrous 3 years ago