not at all. how old are you.. like 13? an ignorant teenager? just because someone tells you that something is happening for THIS or THAT reason doesnt mean it is. try figuring things out for yourself instead of believing the idiots in office.
true. actualy it wasnt ice on greenland at 1300s. But now the humans have effected this. Co-2 is not a gass that make the globe warmer. Its that it stops much of the reflecting of beams from the sun :) .
Nuclear power is not that bad.Take the Candu reactor, for instance. By design, it can't meltdown. I would much rather see alternative, reusable energy sources developed though, because unfortunatly, the waste the nuclear power produces is pretty bad stuff...
Well nuclear power can be great if the right safety precautions are in place, Britain has 55 reactors and I haven't heard of any accident yet. The major problem is transporting the waste (small amounts produced but can be very lethal).
Transporting it is really only a small part of the problem. What do we do with it after that? We surround it in giant chunks of concrete and bury it? There is no really good solution. That's why I want the alternative sources to be developed more.
If we develop controlled nuclear fusion technology, then we wouldn't need to worry about the radioactive waste from nuclear fission. The amount of energy released would be much more than from fossil fuels, and it might very well be the way of the future.
They don't have the ability of producing the amount of energy with current technology that nuclear can...Thats the problem :\ Right now the solar panels we have are very ineffecient, hopefully in a few years that should change. But when it comes to providing massive amounts of power to weight ratio nuclear beats it. But despite that advantage, the waste is always the problem.
neat, global warming comes down to 3 things, move on from the fossil fuel system, move on from the fossil fuel system, move on from the fossil fuel system.
not only that theres one more thing eastern nations like china india and some others should stop breeding like rats and polluting everything inside there countries and all over the world.
Global warming "climate change" is rediculous. It was global COOLING in the 70's. It's a cycle.....
johnayerger13 2 years ago
heh.. how old are you? like 9?
spaser333 2 years ago
not at all. how old are you.. like 13? an ignorant teenager? just because someone tells you that something is happening for THIS or THAT reason doesnt mean it is. try figuring things out for yourself instead of believing the idiots in office.
johnayerger13 2 years ago
true. actualy it wasnt ice on greenland at 1300s. But now the humans have effected this. Co-2 is not a gass that make the globe warmer. Its that it stops much of the reflecting of beams from the sun :) .
Signordie 2 years ago
In order to combat global warming with some effect we may have to switch to nuclear power sad though as it may seem.
therock27374 2 years ago
Nuclear power is not that bad.Take the Candu reactor, for instance. By design, it can't meltdown. I would much rather see alternative, reusable energy sources developed though, because unfortunatly, the waste the nuclear power produces is pretty bad stuff...
hobbes71002 2 years ago 2
Well nuclear power can be great if the right safety precautions are in place, Britain has 55 reactors and I haven't heard of any accident yet. The major problem is transporting the waste (small amounts produced but can be very lethal).
therock27374 2 years ago 2
Transporting it is really only a small part of the problem. What do we do with it after that? We surround it in giant chunks of concrete and bury it? There is no really good solution. That's why I want the alternative sources to be developed more.
hobbes71002 2 years ago
If we develop controlled nuclear fusion technology, then we wouldn't need to worry about the radioactive waste from nuclear fission. The amount of energy released would be much more than from fossil fuels, and it might very well be the way of the future.
starsoffyre 2 years ago
what bout earth power, sun, wind, water:?
Pieterseboy 2 years ago
They don't have the ability of producing the amount of energy with current technology that nuclear can...Thats the problem :\ Right now the solar panels we have are very ineffecient, hopefully in a few years that should change. But when it comes to providing massive amounts of power to weight ratio nuclear beats it. But despite that advantage, the waste is always the problem.
therock27374 2 years ago
what about reducing power need? :-)
k0zka 2 years ago
Yep and of course population control
austpom333 2 years ago
radical
ErikjStudios 2 years ago
neat, global warming comes down to 3 things, move on from the fossil fuel system, move on from the fossil fuel system, move on from the fossil fuel system.
austpom333 2 years ago 2
not only that theres one more thing eastern nations like china india and some others should stop breeding like rats and polluting everything inside there countries and all over the world.
midbluegreen 2 years ago 2
sweet
tomoblivion 2 years ago
nice!
BRANSCOMBEx 2 years ago
sweet
accident7 2 years ago
cool
Climbatizecombat 2 years ago