Added: 9 months ago
From: gsxeclipsepsi
Views: 31,831
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (105)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Good god what are you guys racing on theres no guardrails!! But anywho Ive got a grudgematch of my GSX vs an 03 WRX both with BPUs... Not sure whos gonna win..

  • surprised the wrx didn't blow the head gaskets

  • I love watching these types of videos and reading the comments. It's all a matter of opinion to me. I just enjoy seeing what the bottom line result is.

  • I guess modded with wheels and a fart can still qualifies as modded. I call it "bone stock"

  • Virgin drivers...

  • the eclipse are slow AF

  • @libresylocos01 Some of the fastest cars in the world are eclipses...

  • @ctsincebay lol.. some of the fastest cars in the world are eclipses? No.

  • @KristoffersonPT Let me tell you, daily-driven DSM machines were running 9's and 10's 10 years ago. They are still fast, even by today's standards. If you want to talk about pro cars, how about the WORLD'S FASTEST 4 CYLINDER CAR [that's not tube chassis]? It's a 1999 eclipse that runs 6 second quarter mile times UNIBODY.

  • @ctsincebay doorslammers with nitrous and normally aspirated run 5sec quarters.. normally aspirated, and shit ill pull the top fuel card and the 4 sec quarters. In terms of drag speeds DSMs are not that fast. Unless your talking about street legal cars, but even then there are 7 sec street legal rods out there, where as the 6 second DSM is very far from being street legal. I own a GSX too not hating on DSMs i love em.

  • @KristoffersonPT Oh okay so you've decided to pull the top fuel and top alcohol dragsters out of your ass in an effort to somehow discredit a 6 second quarter mile time by a DSM. OKAY, well derp derp you're right, 6 seconds at 200MHP is slow har har. Fucking tool....

  • @ctsincebay cool your jets dude, your the one who said that "eclipses are some of the fastest cars in the world." Well there not, and as i said i have a GSX that runs low 12's and i still understand the concept that there are much faster cars in the world. So cool it.

  • @KristoffersonPT Dude, shut up man, the number of cars that can run a sub 9 second quarter mile time is extremely limited. if I said Top Fuel cars are among fastest in the world, you'd say something like, "no they're not, top alcohol are faster" if I said "top alcohol are among the fastest in the world" you'd say, "no they're not - jet powered cars are faster"; you're the worst type of moron -- a moron that thinks he's smart.

  • @ctsincebay Top fuel dragsters are faster than top alcohol, it sounds like you know nothing about drag racing at all, stop embarrassing yourself by making inaccurate comments. Your a moron who tried to show up a much smarter moron and failed, i don't think i'm smart i know i'm smart :)

  • @KristoffersonPT Peh, flip flopped them, but you clearly get the picture. I think it's hilarious that you just called yourself a moron. And with that, I guess my point is made! Fucking tool hah

  • @ctsincebay Damn your thick, cant take a joke or understand the reality of cars. I suggest you grow a sense of humor, start researching fast cars, and stop making retarded comments on YouTube that just make you look even stupider than you already are.

  • @KristoffersonPT LOL the "reality of cars" What the hell is that? You provide enough humor for both of us, with your hilarious comments. Your "start researching fast cars" comment is one of such comments. It's funny because you're the one asserting eclipses aren't fast -- when the in FACT, the fastest 4 cylinder in the WORLD is an eclipse. It sounds to me that YOU'RE the one lacking knowledge in this area.

  • @ctsincebay Something you need to understand, is that 6 seconds for a car DESIGNED to do one thing and one thing only, drag racing, is not nearly as fast as other cars designed for only drag racing, such as top fuel cars. That's the other thing, they have to pump 100psi of boost into that little four banger to get 6 secs, when normally aspirated v8's with ONLY NITROUS can break 6 seconds. V8's are king for power production and drag racing in general.

  • @KristoffersonPT Oh god, here we go with this tired bullshit. Okay okay I surrender, 6 seconds is fucking slow. The only cars in the world worth referring to as fast are 10,000HP fucking 1000lb dragsters. Happy? Seriously you're a fucking annoying little twat. Not only do you talk out of your ass (re: eclipses are not fast), but then instead of saying, "wow 6 second quarter? that's fast as shit", you try to save face by coming up with some BS excuse (6 seconds slow compared to 4, derp derp)

  • @KristoffersonPT and NOW you're changing the subject ENTIRELY with the whole tired v8 vs i4 bullshit. You're sorely misinformed if you think ANYTHING can run a 6 second quarter mile at 1 atmosphere. Anyway, I'm done with you. You're the kind of dumb shit that just deserves his ass kicked every now and then. Sadly, the Internet is full of ignorant know-it-alls like you.

  • @chemao1978 Have you not heard of doorslammers?!?!? if your gonna take anything away from this whole argument at least look up nitrous only doorslammers on that site i led you to you ignorant piece of shit. i cannot believe your making comments like that when i give you the site proving you wrong. You've never heard of the rivalry of supercharged only vs nitrous only doorslammers? They both run 5.7. Drag racing is nothing like computer boot times you nerdy fuck, prolly never held a wrench before

  • @KristoffersonPT HAHAHAH what are you proving wrong? Oh I see, about sub 6 second on nitrous. Okay point made but frankly, you're not entirely correct. Do you realize that nitrous does the same thing as forced induction in a different way. Perhaps stating "at 1 ATM" wasn't complete enough. How's this "at 1 ATM of typical oxygen levels". Regardless you still are trying to detract from the fact that you made a retarded statement that a 6 second eclipse is not fast.

  • @ctsincebay A 6 second eclipse isn't fast compared to a v8 dragster. I never said anywhere thats not fast, i said theres other shit thats faster out there. You brought up "some of the fastest cars in the world" and i simply denied your completely ridiculous statement.

  • @KristoffersonPT HAHAHAHA now you're backpedaling. Fucking loser here's a QUOTE of your comment: **QUOTE** lol.. some of the fastest cars in the world are eclipses? No.

    KristoffersonPT 2 days ago

    **END QUOTE** You're just sad.

  • @ctsincebay Its funny, fastest no. Lol that fastest cars in the world are like jet cars that top at 700 mph do you mean quicker? Do you know the difference? I think your a little confused about acceleration and top speed. So my comment was entirely correct. In both regards to, that an extremely retarded statement if you think about it eclipses are not nearly the "fastest" cars nor the "quickest"

  • @KristoffersonPT Oh god you know what, you just fail and I'm tired of bitch slapping you, but I'll stick my dick in your mouth ONE MORE TIME, just because I know you like the taste and feel of my salty jizz slithering across your tongue and down your throat. My comment was "eclipses are some of the fastest cars in the world". If you don't consider anything over 5 seconds fast, then fine. 99.9999999% of people would interpret "fast" to mean 11 seconds or less. suck it dry bitch

  • @ctsincebay So vulgar, so young. Anyway its not one of the fastest cars in the world, its just a really fast car thats all im trying to get at.

  • @ctsincebay You're right a 6 second eclipse is fast. The other eclipse gsx's running high 14's and low 15's are not fast. Stop saying eclipses are fast like its a general statement. When Tony Palo first broke into the 8's with his integra did all integras become fast all of a sudden? No. Integras are slow. A true general statement is that integras and eclipses are both slow, and you're an eclipse fan boy who only runs a 20 second boot up laptop.

  • @betterdropdatdonk Dude shut the fuck up you don't even know what the conversation started with. I stated, "some of the fastest cars int he world are eclipses", in reply to his assertion that eclipses are slow. That said, in reply to your ATTEMPT at a personal atack -- I have never owned an eclipse. I have a celica gts, g35 coupe, fx45, and gran turismo. That video was because I sold 3 of them. I personally use a Sager Notebook. Suck it.

  • @ctsincebay No, you only own your 20 second slow ass laptop and a little boys vulgar mouth. Everything about you is slow you probably think your slow g35 is fast lol. Are you slowly growing up or something. It does not make any sense to me how you're so immature its really mind blowing. I don't care what cars you say you have or what laptop you use. You're just slow. Don't worry though little guy one day you'll grow up. lol

  • @betterdropdatdonk ACTUALLY that video was made because I sold 6 of them and I used that as a good example of the performance of the laptop. Presently I use a Sager 8170 laptop for fun and an elitebook for work. My current g35 is definitely not fast; it's just nice to drive. My first g35 was pretty decent. made 387 at the wheels with a stillen kit. I've also had a 91 turbo 2 rx7, 89 starion with t3/t4, 92 civic vx with a drag gen 3, and a 95 240sx KAT.

  • @ctsincebay no you didtnt

  • @rafarocket Yes, I did. The starion had a t3/t4 swap untuned at 16psi on a manual boost controller. No idea how much power it made. I had a couple more cars and then got the 91 RX7 turbo2, with ceramic seals and a T25, tuned at exclusiv to make 254whp. I wrecked it, got a couple of cars, then got the civic. POS with NOTHING; stripped to the bone with an LS and 100 shot ran 14.2, blew the motor, put a b18c and the drag gen with custom manifold. ran 11.87@118 in Enis. gave it to a

  • @rafarocket friend who eventually put an H22 in it with a huge ass turbo and ruined people all the time at street races around DFW area. had a few more cars, then got an 03 base g35coupe blue; did a sport package conversion, installed an all polk stereo, dropped, rims, etc and finally put a stillen supercharger kit on it. safe tuned at Alamo to 387whp on 91pump gas. Someone hit it in the parking lot on the rear QP so fixed and replaced it with an S600. Been enjoying luxury since then

  • @rafarocket Ops forgot to say, I bought a 95 240sx off a buddy. It made 354WHP on a built KA-T with a T61. I parked it at my mom's house when I left the state and 2 years later ended up selling it to a friend. Presently own an unrestricted 01 GTS, 04 FX45, 06 G35 TOTL, and an 08 Maserati GT. Are they fast? Not really, but aside from the GTS (which gets great MPG for commutes!), I prefer enjoying the luxury, and have grown out of the boy racer stage.

  • @ctsincebay funny, you claim to have all these cars with all these mods, yet all of your uploads are video games. go back to playing counter strike kid.

  • @rafarocket FIRST OF ALL, this account is not my real account. Secondly, I did not have a digital video camera when I had these cars, BUT I do have digital pictures of the G35 and 240, plus the cars I currently own. I have a bitchslap video posted with them, plus some other stuff if you really want my dick in your mouth: tinyurl com/6wk8ymr, tinyurl com/7jx23h4, tinyurl com/7d4qs42, tinyurl com/7nmkquk. Check those links... then be a good little boy and swallow.

  • @ctsincebay You need moar naawwwssss

  • @betterdropdatdonk I don't get it.

  • @rafarocket Also, I said very clearly in a previous post that the videos I posted from this account are just for selling stuff, although I have a bitchslap video that's in "private" mode on this account that I can unhide for you -- but in return you have to post a video holding a piece of paper saying "RAFAROCKET IS A JEALOUS PIECE OF SHIT" after you see it.

  • @ctsincebay your call of duty ultra settings video... :47 highschool class ring fail.

  • @rafarocket LOL how is my wearing a class ring a fail? Your post is completely random and makes no point at all.

  • @chemao1978 Sorry, i didn't lead you to the site but i will now. Draglist.com, use the search feature and look up "doorslammers" when you get to the list look at nitrous only doorslammers. Seriously i cant believe your talking out of YOUR ass when you know shit about the NHRA try to find a god damn normally aspirated 4 banger up there with these cars. I can't wait to here your next comment.

  • @KristoffersonPT Actually, I was building cars likely before you were old enough to drive. Among various other vehicles, the ones that were actually pretty fast were: 1993 civic vx with a b18c and drag gen 3 kit - 11.8@118 on slicks; 1990 rx7 turbo 2 making 254 at the wheels on 93; 1987 Mitsubishi starion with a t3/t4 hybrid swap, street tune (about 300whp); 2005 350z all nismo power IHE, clutch, packs, rotors; 2003 G35 coupe base conversion to sport package with a Stillen kit;

  • @KristoffersonPT made 387WHP; 1995 240sx kat making 338WHP on a t61. I CURRENTLY own own an unrestricted 01 celica gts, 06 g35 coupe with everything, an 04 FX45 with a badass stereo, a 2011 wrx limited with a badass stereo, and my most recent purchase a 2008 maserati granturismo. Other cars I've owned are: 2 z31 300zx (1 turbo), a 91 supra turbo, 98 frontier, 93 chevy shortbed, 2003 cl type s, 95 acura legend coupe, 97 m3, 2001 s600, 2001 rx300, 04 volusia jetted, what else? hmm

  • @KristoffersonPT Incidentally, while I agree that more displacement has more potential, let's face it, there haven't BEEN any 4 cylinder motors that try to get fast on just nitrous. I'd assert that if there were, you'd see some in the traps at 6 seconds, also. I'd also like to point out that your getting ass ass hurt because you asserted that eclipses aren't fast -- and I pointed out that the fastest I4 in the world is an eclipse. *bitchslapped!*

  • @ctsincebay If four cylinders are so much better than v8's how come there hasn't been any? The answer is simple, there not inherently good at making power. Especially large displacement 4 cylinder engines, the vibrations would tear the car to shreds. Thats why you dont see any 10 litre four cylinders, and see many 10 litre v8's. They handle the displacement better, and make more power and much more torque.

  • @KristoffersonPT LOL When did I say 4 cylinder motors are better than 8 cylinder motors? And the amount of displacement doesn't have a bearing on whether a motor is balanced or not. Dumbass you just showed the world how little you know about engines.

  • @ctsincebay 4 cylinder engines are naturally high in vibreations. Why do you think they put harmonic balancers in almost all of the new 4 cylinders. Journals on a 4 cylinder engines are 90 degrees apart, which will naturally cause more vibrations than an engine with less extreme angles on the crankshaft due to having more cylinders, making them smoother.

  • Comment removed

  • I'd still take the eclipse over the wrx.

  • wow two 15 sec cars racing

  • Jesus fucking christ.

    1. Stock means it is equipped from the factory with a four cylinder horizontally opposed turbocharged engine. How the fuck does a H6-swap have anything to do with what I said? Read the title of the video clip. STOCK WRX.

    2. There are four Subaru models in the United States that was equipped with an H6. The Subaru Tribeca, Subaru XT6, Subaru SVX, and the new Subaru Legacy.

  • @iinneeddaannaammee. HAHAHA You suck so bad it hurts. Please don't go on car vidz and comment like you think you know cars when there's die hard fans like me and hdempsey83, to put you down. You fail good sir. Now run along and make me a sammich.

  • @mobshooter hahaaaa im a fukkin mechanic so talk shit get hit, id like to see u take me on in my bbc nova, 558 ci haha and abt ur sammich, learn to fukkin spell and maybe ull get my knucle one XD smh

  • @iinneeddaannaammee its "knuckle".

  • 96 gsx = only 4 cyl.

    03 impreza = 6 cyl w/turbocharger! XD

    who did u think was gonna win

  • @iinneeddaannaammee

    Seriously? WOW.

    1. 2002-2012 WRX and 2004-2012 STi models are equipped with a four cylinder turbocharged engine.

    2. The Mitsubishi GSX is also an AWD turbocharged four cylinder just like the WRX.

    3. It's obvious in the video, but your comment dictates you are not 'winning'.

  • @hdempsey83 @iinneeddaannaammee

    The ONLY was that 6 cylinder comment would be true is if you swapped in a 6 cylinder boxer engine from the Subaru SVX or New Foresters.

  • @Rejukem New Foresters have a 6? I thought it was only the Tribeca that had a 6 in Subaru's SUV lineup

  • @loweredtalon Yeah you are right, sorry I mispoke. The new EZ series flat 6 is only in the Legacy, Outback and Tribeca

  • @Rejukem I thought so, but you just never know!

  • @hdempsey83 too bad the 2002 Japanese s3 models r a 3.6 liter inline 6 cylinder, most of the models are in fact 4 bangers tho, but the turbos on the gsx only threw around 5 lbs of boost, im not dissing on anyone but im just stating my personal opinion of why Subaru is better

  • @iinneeddaannaammee It's better because it makes the same power with a larger engine and more boost? How is that better?

  • @iinneeddaannaammee 5psi..might want to do some research..1G eclipse 8-12psi and 2g 10-15psi...i do admit GSX transfer cases arnt the greatest

  • @mitsugsx419

    iinneeddaannaammee is clearly a complete moron lmao you're wasting your time arguing with his dumbass. plus the 2g have shitty t25 stock turbos that are practically maxed out on boost from factory.

  • @mnelsen123 bs you do not know what you are talking about. That stock turbo screams more than any other stock that I know of.

  • @iinneeddaannaammee I hate wannabe posers like you,keep to skateboards.

  • @iinneeddaannaammee LOOK WHO'S TWELVE!!!

  • That was a good race. I like subies. They take a beating!

  • slow motion

  • jeeez...three pages of arguments lol, dsm's are a loooooonnnngggg proven powerplant...since the very first days these motors have revolutionized the industry, im a subi fan as much as the next guy, (i own a 98 gst however) and even i can say ive handed a few wrx's/sti's an ass whipping, as well as recieved one or two, hell, ive had a killer battle with a suped dodge deisel on the highway, win or lose, i give an ''awesome race'' wave and go on about my business...thats what good sports do.

  • @Imakeplanesboom I didnt know terrorists like wrx's haha anyways if you havent seen any dsm shootout vids then you really shouldnt be talking... and 5.0 stangs being slow??? you REALLY think the world surrounds the wrx and sti dont you? get your mind right and give props where credit is due, idk how ppl can have fun just trolling around -.-

  • @zach... I won retard

  • I conclude that the eclipse in this video has 1 maybe 2 mods, and that still wouldn't put it at the same HP as the WRX stock, intake and exhaust doesn't help when you leave your little baby turbo, intercooler pipes, side mount intercooler, and shitty O2 housing w/ mini me downpipe... the race seen here is understandable, a stock WRX against a mostly stock GSX

  • Eclipses suckkk

  • @Zach704033 Your Mom sucks...very good too!

  • @Imakeplanesboom You have no clue what your talking about. Your probably just mad cuz one spanked you. Please stop being a typical ignorant youtuber.

  • if youre a shit-talking prick on youtube:

    its an automatic give-away that you have never / will never own a fast car and drive your moms van to school everyday

  • idk what happened because i have a 1g with a 16g and a maf t with gm maf and a front mount and im on 20lbs and i beat a 2011 sti and 2 evos soo idk what mods he has but they cant be great

  • all shit. jdm

  • Eclipse... why do you chumps modify or even get seen drivving these fukn pieces of shit??

  • @thebadestlad let me guess.....proud shitstang owner?

  • @fr00bers Nope :D currently a type RA wrx thanks for asking anyways fuck eyes :D

  • @thebadestlad yeah i can see ur channel is loaded with RA vids

  • that's one sexy lookin eclipse. pussy magnet for sure.

  • @JTmagicman24 By pussy, you mean dick. Then sure it is.

  • @Imakeplanesboom Well, I guess, if that's what you're into. Good luck with that....

  • @JTmagicman24 I don't own an eclipse.

  • @Imakeplanesboom well, then. You fail in more than one area. Good Job Buddy. If you think a WRX is better looking than the eclipse, you sir need to check yourself into a mental ward.

  • @JTmagicman24 Eclipses are pieces of shit, they sound terrible, have super cheap interiors, you will never get laid because you have one, powerless, nice hood bump, fwd? they had to make them awd to compete with wrx's. Eclipses are gay ricer cars, you can find them for 2500 on craigslist.

  • @Imakeplanesboom ah, but you are wrong. mine is faster than a 5.0 mustang, stock vs stock. I have full leather and sunroof. with full on viscous traction control. Look, if you don't understand by now, I do not now, or will I ever value a random stranger's rant about how my car sux, especially when I love my car. I used to beat WRXs with my stang and I got waxed by a GST. so you are very ignorant. Plus WRXs are susceptible to rod knock at any time. porche rip off. I'm done with you.

  • @JTmagicman24 You just don't want to hear my reasoning as to why your car is crap. A 5.0 mustang? Oooooh, those are slow as fuck!. You're talking to me about traction? awd? You lost to a gst? If I ever lost to that big of a piece of shit, I would have killed myself. You only get knock if you don't know how to take care of your motor, and thank's for comparing my car to something that costs 4 times as much. Yo gane.

  • @Imakeplanesboom Actually... The hood bump is to clear the timing belt assembly, and... Eclipse GSX's (AWD Eclipses) were here long before any WRX's were. I think the first year they imported and WRX's was around 2000, and I have owned a 1991 GSX for many years. It's nearly stock, and I have an 04 WRX, completely stock. The GSX whoops it's ass any time it chooses...

  • @hsvbrolsma this argument would be relevent if there was a 1g in the video, 1g's are way better than 2g's and just cause this eclipse is modded doesnt mean that its modds are very great, a cat back exhaust and a k&n air filter is not much of a gain, especially since the 2g already has a tiny turbo and seriously restricted intercooler system not to mention a freaking side mount! but I agree with you, mitsubishi 90's awd turbo cars are freaking amazing if you mod them right.

  • @Tucker2682 Imakeplanesboom said that they had to make Eclipse's AWD to compete with WRX's. My point was simply that GSX's had been around for far longer than WRX's. I have no real experience with 2g's, aside from riding in them. But both 1g's and 2g's have the same 4g63, and TD05 turbos.

  • @hsvbrolsma Your almost right, yeah the gsx has been around alot longer than any wrx, that guy dosent have a clue what he is talking about... but the turbo in the 2g and the one in the 1g are two very different turbos, the 1g has a 14b and the 2g has a t25... TD05 mostly just means mitsibishi turbo... but your right about 4g63 in both, 91-92 was the 6 bolt, some 93's got the 6 bolt, than after that was the 7 bolt 4g63...

  • thats one of the ways to break in that wrx lol

  • damn the red and green 2gb you shot in here are nice... what were the times?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more