Added: 4 years ago
From: ReelzChannel
Views: 476,386
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (202)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thanks J.K.Rowling for my magically childhood

    greetings from Poland

  • Harry Potter is my childhood!!

  • "Harry Potter is about confronting fears, finding inner strength and doing what is right in the face of adversity. Twilight is about how important it is to have a boyfriend."

  • Twilight is fucking gay.

  • i dont like twilight harry potter much better

  • tim burke is a genius. and jk rowling not to mention...

  • Dear Joanne Rowling,

    Thank you for my childhood.

    Love,

    Me

  • vampires are supposed to die when exposed to the sun. but in twilight they fucking glitter. WHAT. THE. FUCK.

  • i hate twilight but let's admit it. kristen stewart is still hot.

  • @needcoffee She's ugly as fuck

  • who the hell was that person who first brought Twilight into this discussion????

    Tell him to rot in hell....

  • can we all just stop comparing twilight and harry potter seriously harry potter and twilight is so different first of all theres no wizard or magic in twilight and in twilight they dont even use wands or magic broom sticks can we just stop comparing them because none of them copied each other and lets just enjoy life! watch movies!!

  • nn capisco nnt -.-''

  • The last enemy that shall be destoryed is......Twilight Saga ;)

  • Insult Twilight, you insult something that's been around for a few years. Insult Harry Potter, and you insult someone's childhood.

  • i lookes up robbie coltrane and he DOES NOT look like HAGRID!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @lolpli8 -.-

  • HP is a heartwarming story about a boy and his friends fighting the evils of racism. Twilight is a book about a 108-year-old pedophile who sneaks into a girls bedroom and watches her sleep.

  • its the phlosopher stone

  • With HP: when I write fan fiction about Potters, I'm always concentrating really hard so that I don't shame Rowling's fabulous work.

    With Twilight: I wrote one fan fiction and got bored for it was built up better than the original book.

  • i don't really like Twilight

    I've read the book and it's all lovey-dovey

    Bella tried so hard to be cool like "are you scared" "ooohh noooo i'm not".

    That annoyed me. wtf she's so weak. She caused a lot of problems for those vampires and wtf she acted cool again. She can't do anything without a man

    Edward, too.

    He's annoying, trying to be handsome all the time.

    He wanted to rape Bella. Oh shit.

  • im not gana say anything but im just gana say that twilight for ever

  • how can someone even think about twilight when harry potter is near? PLEASE. twilight may be nice but everyone can write that....it`s unfair of us HP fans to compare twilight with HP because there`s obviously nothing to compare.HP is EPIC and twilight is for justinbieberfans.

  • I think that the movies compliment the books very well. It's like they need each other. While the books give you the story, character development, and what goes on at the school, J.K. doesn't give you very descriptive details.

    The movies show you just how magical the wizard worlding world is by showing show all of the visual aspects and all of the details. They make the action seem much more frightening and real. However, without the books, it would be hard to understand the plot of the movies.

  • @SpringSkies i don't think the book need the movies but my mother started to read me the books before the first movie. So maybe i,m not objective but i true love that world.

  • Everyone can have their opinion, But you have to remember that Twilight is love story a vampire romance and this is a magic movie with amazing effects instead.

    Then who compares Twilight to Harry Potter is a dumb!!!!

    HP Forever

  • I hate you JK Rowling. I hate you for ending Harry Potter! WHY????

  • I like both movies, I think that they have both done great job somewhat following both series books. As for the books though I would have to say Harry Potter, but only becuase I have not got to reading the Twilight sereis, and probably never will.

  • Twilight is just retarded.

  • Twilight is for girls, you may ask the author.

  • esjenny md

  • esjenny

  • I like twilight but the CGI looks so fake in Harry Potter you barely notice it

  • @addorbleness112233 don't talk unless 62 people thumbs up ur comment.

  • Joanne is a genius. Meyer is a dumbhead.

  • this guy has an awesome job. I think it would be so much fun to be the costume designer for the HP movies. I can't wait til the 7th movie!

  • Twilight characters are BANAL! Bella is totally a Mary Sue, while Harry Potter's characters are all well-developed with detailed and believable personality.

  • LOVE THE SPECIAL EFFECTS!

  • harry potter 7 part 1 --19 november 2010

    part 2--16 july 2011

  • The FX Producer uses Maya and Maya Liquids for scenes like the one in HP HPB

    with the Millenium Bridge

  • JOANNE K ROWLING!!!i thank her so much because of Harry Potter!

  • WHat do they use for the 3d creatures?

  • they use way too much green screen and blue screen!!

  • stupid questions but since i applied to university i truely had no time to go to the cinema... which harry potter movie has been released so far? anyway i preferred the books but i just cannot remember whether there will come another one... sorry :)

  • Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince is the latest film out...

    But there is still another film to come out which will be getting split into 2 parts, and that is called Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

    Hope that helped ;)

  • whats FTW?

  • for the win

  • YEAAAH THANKS :D

  • my opinion on harry potter would be that its good, possibly amazing, but theyre focusing way too much on the whole romance side of things. but thats just my opinion, feel free to go against me

  • I agree. have u read the books?

  • i totally agreee!

  • i know, right? they're focusing on relationships rather than the important things... like hbp, they didnt show when Harry and Dumbledore went into the pensieve into Bob Odgen's memory, and they didnt show the scene with Hokey the house-elf, and they made it kinda boring...

  • they're both great

  • guys don't even start with this twilight thing. yo everyone knows twilight sucks ass it's totally gay and harry potter has been around for way longer and if you think twilight is better you are obviously a retard

  • @awesomesox343 THANK YOU SOME BODY GETS ITS

  • @awesomesox343 That is very true. It's not even the same league. Harry Potter pwns and will always pwn Twilight.

  • @awesomesox343

    I LOVE YOU FOR SAYING THAT ON THE TOP TEN HARRY POTTER IS ABOVE STUPID TWI$%%HT AND THE STORY LINE MORE APPROPRIATE AND JUST WAY BEETER THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SAYING THAT!! :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) !

  • @awesomesox343 definetely TWILIGHT SUCKS BAAAD

  • @awesomesox343 soyou are retardet fucking asshole harry potter is suck ass twilight will be the best movie so shut the fuck up and dont talk about twilight like that

  • @moahamed1000 suck my dick gay ass bitch!

  • @beybreaker oh shut the fuck up motha fuckaa you bitch ass nagga

  • @moahamed1000 GAY ASS TEENAGER ALERT THAT ONLY CARES ABOUT THE BOYS IN TWIFUCK!! THATS RACIST AND STUPID!!!

  • @Official202 ok you thing tiwlight suck man is it better then harry potter a boy flying on a staks

  • @moahamed1000 And....... Like twifuck is even better.

    (1). Pages and pages of how edward gayfuck is so beutiful. (2). 107 Year old peodiphile fucking a teenager.

    (3). The teenager has a baby. Which can't even happen. Because vampires are dead.

    (4). And bella is a fucking moron.

    (5). Harry Potter made practically my hole family cry.

    So is there anything else i have to comment. Oh and Harry Potter has a bigger fanbase than twifuck does. So anything you would like to say. :)

  • @Official202 no no evertthing you said is not true tiwlight have more fan

  • @moahamed1000 Lets see other thing's that are wrong with twifuck.

    (7). There wrong about the Warewolfs. Because you can only become a werewolf when it's full moon. And it's host has no control over it.

    (8). Vampires burn to death in the light. So they got that wrong.

    (9). It has a poorly written story.

    (10). The only people that like twilght are mothers that have nothing to do and desperate teenage girls.

    (11). When i finished the book i was bored. And the movies were fucking stupid.

  • @moahamed1000 no agree exactly on what official said on twifuck, harry potter is a awesome series harry potter has more fans than twifuck.

  • @Official202 sorryi dont have time to talk about a movie that have a guy fly on something

  • @moahamed1000 Oh well okay then. Thats alright cause i don't have time to talk about a movie that every single thing in it is retarded, stupid and gay. Oh and did i forget that everything in it is also WRONG!

  • @Official202 opss i know harry potter so now i will not replay agian see ya

  • @awesomesox343 actually its the girl character, she has no face expressions what so ever which makes the movie too predictable

  • @awesomesox343 i completely and utterly agree!

  • id defitnitley recommend harry potter books and movies over twilight. i mean love and vampires dont mix!!!!!

  • well, watch Coppola's Dracula.

  • twilight is for people who cut themselves. there i said it.

  • Fuck you. I hate Twilight and that is a horrible association. I'm offended.

  • Well, I think the only thing is that you dont like love stories.

  • hahaha!!! yeah xut themselves while watching it!!! :D:D:D

  • I saw twilight. It sucked so fuckig hard. There's no action in it!

  • read it :)

  • I agree you should read it before say such things.

  • ty! I dont understand why ppl say it sucks,and that the one whos reading twilight is cutting them self,thats not nice! and for the record i do not cut my self!

  • ok shut up about twilight. this is harry potter. dont even compare the two cause theyre different and harry potter owns twilight. i saw the movie and it sucks

  • Y is ther such a competition btween harry potter nd twilight

    Jus relax u don't hav 2 pick 1 u lik better ther totally different

  • helllllooooooooooooooooooooooo­ooooooooooo

  • assyyyriaa u have no taste! even though twilight is good. harry poter iz way better. die edward die!!!!!!!!!

  • AHAHAH.

    Try thinking again. Harry Potter was such a genius book because J.K. Rowling is an absolutely brilliant author who made the books grow up with us, and let us watch the characters change as they grew older. And also, J.K. Rowling must be MUCH richer than Stephanie Meyer, but that's just a guess.

  • I know right o: I was 11 when the first movie came out and then I started reading the books, but I was the same age as everyone then, and I really grow up with the books and movies. ^^;

  • U dont have to hate one to like the other.

    I love both movies/series

    The movies can always be better but i stil like them.

  • huh, watching that clip with the brooms from the first movie I noticed I haven't seen that one since... what year did it come out?

  • are you talking about when they say "up" or the one where there is a line of them and they all have brooms cos that is the 5th film not the first :)

  • it's the one where harry flies for the first time.. where they're supposed to make the broom fly up to their hands. God, they're so cute.

  • That is the first movie.. They're learning to ride a broom.

  • 2001

  • HARRY POTTER RO-OOX!

  • i just watch the movies :L

  • they should put more fighting into the movies....u know how they delete so many parts from the book...well they should make the fights longer....like on the last book the fight at hogwarts better be teh shit.......

  • I agree with you about it being easier to include moments in the first two, but i am not sure if you're saying they could have cut scenes they put in in the movie or if it's okay. I'm mainly just trying to get across that the bridge opening was important for the general audience who have not read the books and it opens with that rather than the ministers talking about it to start with action that will draw the audience in. It's simply strategic.

  • new harry potter movie at sixreasons.blogspot dott com

  • Comment removed

  • I loved the first 2 movies, they were so layed back, and took there time, now, 3 - 5,6,.. they seem so rushed, parts are missed, evrything hapens so fast, It seems like you dont get time to watch it, its just in a rush to get as much of the book story into the film. :(

  • hey.. true.. but potter's still great.. but the only book turned into movie [like full out] is LOTR.. [except for this one part... which i forgot... - gah.. i need to rewatch it and get my dork genes back on]

  • Comment removed

  • i agree

  • Well because the first two books were just over 300 pages and had a very to-the-point storyline. As the later books have alot more plot to unfold. They try to incorporate as much storyline as they can because books 4-7 were 600+ pages.

  • I agree with you but I think it's because there's happening a lot more in the books and it's difficult too get everything in the movie, but everything in the book is so important for the nexts books, that it has to be in the movie,

    because els the people who don't read te books wouldn't understand that's why it all happens in a rush,

    But I wish that the slowed it down a little more too

    Sorry for my bad Englisch

  • This guy is great! I don't think working on these effects is easy, it must very hard and to reach the audience satisfaction and make them believe this is true when the crew only know the tuth, whoa...

  • ok. That's weird. In the Harry Potter movies, there's always a different music, but in the interviews, they always take the first movie music...

  • salute to all the graphic designers!! and editors of harry potter film series!

    hands down!.

    everytime i watched it.

    i was amazed by the visual effects.

  • hahah.... ron is so cute when his broom stick slap his face

  • It's Emma Watson, not Eamma Watson.

  • yeah, but one little spelling mistake dosent matter, does it? =P EMMA IS THE BEEESSSTTT!!<3<3 She's my fav. out of Ron, Harry and Hermioneee<3

  • hermoine granger is hot

  • I LOVE HARRY POTTER SERIES

  • I LOVE HARRY POTTER

  • Harry Potter movies have always had AMAZING effects.

  • Amazing I love it

    Harry potter is a greatest movie in the world.

  • Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone? Is that what they call it in America?

    Isn't it officially called Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone?

  • I think "Sorcerer's Stone" is a name more cooler...

  • People call it Sorcerer's Stone and Philosopher's Stone. Whichever sounds better to the person saying it. But, yes, I think it is originally called Philosopher's Stone.

  • really? I have always know it to be sorcerer's stone

  • When J.K. Rowling wrote it, she wrote Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, but the publishing company thought that American kids would think of philosophy as like Greek or Roman or whatever the boring stuff is called. They basically thought we were too stupid to understand the title.

  • They call it Philosopher's stone in Europe, in America it's just called Sorcerer's Stone. It's just the differing languages and how Europe uses different words than America does.

  • but the europian one is correct becuase the film is english

  • I wonder what program they use to make this

  • i see maya at :29

  • after effects? final cut studio?

  • it was probably:

    maya(3d)

    after effects(compositing and wand beams)

    premiere pro(editing.) (since this was made on a PC, that means no final cut)

  • Could be any other editing program, premiere pro is closer to a prosumer level I think. And for compositing they would probably use a lot of their own software (not one program). Warner brothers also outsources shots to multiple companies like ILM and some others. And they also use their own soft- and hardware.

    Maybe they use macs, who knows :p

    (not that premiere and after effects are bad or anything, It's great and I use it myself)

  • I know, but after effects and premiere could have been used in this movie.

    Superman returns was edited in Premiere, and alot of compositing was done with after effects in that movie also.

  • Awsome effects :)

  • awsome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • beautiful these special effects r incredible ! and tim is soo luky he gets to work with HARRY POTTER! ppl that is SUMTHIN !

  • thast seriously real hott

  • well like i said everybody who makes the movies assume emphasis on assume that ppl have read the books.i know that the actors haven't read the books i never said that. i like all the harry potter movies there great. it takes time to make all the stuff they make and i appreciate them for it. i still like reading it better than seeing, but i still love the movies. im gonna go see this again! cuz it so good.

  • honestly speaking, book 5 was the weakest bk of the entire series.. the movie was better than the book in my opinion despite skipping loads of other details..the flow of teh movie was gr8 and dan is hotttt hott hott!

  • I guess we can't alwiz fel exciting in life. Book 5 is boring but in a way, it's more into all character's emotion and more into theis personal life. Which in a way is also something differ from the rest..I do agree it's bored..the movie is much better in a way..

  • How would Emma Watson react if Tom Felton just walked up to her and grabbed her and kissed her passionately on the lips then told her that he's always loved her?

  • I like how they fly past a cruise ship on their way to London even though the wizarding world is forbidden to show itself to Muggles.

  • Loved the movie too. All the details they left out make the book that much better. And Luna was great! Love that shot when they're flying to London.

  • personally i liked the movie...yeah they left out stuff but jk approved it so apparently it wasnt that important...we still learned about neville's parents and the other stuff just not as detailed as in the book. the ppl who make the movies assume that the ppl goin to see the movie have already read the book and knows every little detail. the movie didn't suck one bit! i luved the action and everything. if they put in everything it would have been a four hour movie

  • Not all the people read the books, (even some of the actors never read the books), so people get dissapointed of movie 5 so we have to admit that it was one of the worst movies in Harry potter series. (I don't like the book 5)but i have to agree that in the book you feel desperate, you want to scream). And in the movie is very boring and nothing happen, what the hell they where thinking?

  • the movie was good but i think they rushed it thye really missed out a lot of the parts like the hospital scene and they changed a couple of things

  • For all the ol'school crowd out there tell me if I'm lying on this remember "The Neverending Story" from 1990?" Atreyu the nothing tell that Harry Potter holds a candle to this classic. I'm a grown ass man and I still watch it when it just happens to pop up on cable.

  • Ya gotta check out "Vampire - Out of the Coffin."

  • but i loveeed lunaa!!