They could scan the atomic structure of anything and programme in into this to make an exact copy! People could own exact copies of: the declaration of independance, billy the kid's gun, some of the world's first computers, anything! (Those were just some random things I would like to have btw.)
@fyrverkerimamma somehow I think the concept of "we make household item and you buy it" will become obsolete at that point. So as "ownership" and "copyrights".
I'd love to see nanotechnology be made for purely defensive purposes before they go into any ventures of fabrication/AI/Medicinal uses. Let's learn how to use these to defend ourselves from everything we already have, before we venture into something that could potentially kill us all, in more ways than one.
And by the way, what happens when just one of those millions of little machines breaks down?
@Zareste If you have a machine that is able to make things from molecules then what stops it from making food? or clothes or replicate itself from dust and dirt? If a machine like this sees the light of day the consequences will be far bigger than just piracy. It will change society as we know it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
if you have Jesus, you don't need technology to live forever, and I plan to, and it is not going to cost me one penny, people of the earth enjoy what little time you have left, cause God will soon come to take it away from you and make it the Paradise it is suppose to be/
@persevere67 you go ahead and keep believing in your fairy tail while I turn immortal and rich beyond your wildest dreams into a true paradise that actually exists and one that wasn't made up from a science fiction book like the bible
@persevere67 The sun is setting on the age of ignorance and ideology, my friend. I suggest investing your spirituality where it deserves to be --- the unity of man, nature, and technology. Best of wishes,
2020 - Nanotechnology is in place for industrial, agricultural and medical applications,
2025 - US found poorly educated because they ditched 'evolutionism' 'Darwinism' and 'Naturalism' for christian science after protest.
2030 - US sits on stockpiles of nukes, demands China and europe provide their fat butts with resources then launch nukes but when those nukes are obliterated by nano interceptors they spit teeth at each other.
2040 - US adopts new sciences beginning with Lamark evolution.
@ganados0 That sounds like a very plausible anti-doomsday situation haha. Frickin America, I swear 98% of the time I feel like a foreigner here. By the way I'm glad I'm not the only one that realizes that we can create effective nuke shields by deploying a nano-cloud that disintegrates anything the system identifies as dangerous. So many people think that offense is the only thing that's going to advance. Defense advances as well, jeez.
Nuclear fusion energy (free energy) and replicators (nanotech assemblers) will render money and economics null and void. Can't wait for the Star Trek future!
@WTF1920 Nanotechnology does not equal violation of the laws of thermodynamics, fool. To simplify that in terms you can understand, it doesn't allow you to pull bullets or gasoline out of your ass. Real life nanotech (not the silly shit you are thinking of) will be an extremely limited use technology, with nieche applications limited to computer fabrication (as was demonstrated here). There are very good reasons in support of this stance, none of which you would comprehend.
So let me get this straight, this "Nanotech Assembler" would be able to create a computer with billions of times more power than todays best...yet it wouldn't be able to make a simple piece of lead with a thin coppen coating? Dude, Whatever.
@WTF1920 Haha, shows how much you know on the subject! Fact is, the larger the object is, the less precision it can be manufactured with by nanotechnology. Production time is also far longer than competing technologys. Nanotech would only be usefull for medicinal uses, or fabricating small objects (hmm, kind of like those electronic components you mentioned). Dumbass.
@WTF1920 Believe me, there is a fine line between enthusiasm and wankery, just as there is about ignorance and stupidity. You, sir, have crossed that line.
If robots, computers, nanotech and anything else not mentioned, how or why even use money? Seriously, I see it as pointless, by that time the culture should be able to comprehend how to interact in such a high tech society.
@vid828 actually i was wondering if it could replicate human bones to perfection enabling us to build cyborgs with these things.. bwahahahaha they need to make a movie about that.. lol take over the world.. oh yeah i robot and terminator. dang
@Grindednigg Umm, no, you are heavily mistaken. I don't see how the hell using nanotech to straighten bones out = posthuman, or why anyone would think they need nanotechnology to do that in the first place.
Wrong tool.
Gene engineering would allow you to do much more than merely straighten bones, it would give you bones that have triple the yield strength of the ones you have now, bullet resistant skin (like an elephant or rhino), and muscles capable of far greater exertion. You wouldn't be
superman, more like luke cage. Thats still vastly, vastly better than the weak bodies we are encumbered with today. Likewise, I doubt the kind of associations we make with cyborgism will turn out to be realistic in the future. People won't be walking around with pipes and shit sticking out from their body. Cybernetic implants will likely be designed to conform to aesthetic trends.
@Grindednigg it was an attempt at humor guy. lol you internet nerds love to flex your brain muscles so much you are oblivious to a joke. Of course at the same time there is alot of untold potential to these machines so whats to say im wrong? if its building things on a molecular structure why couldnt you make anything? provided that the amino acids and proteins were there you could have infinite outcomes. :)
@Grindednigg and id prob make a 14th crystal skull and store the sum off human knowledge in it then make a daring escape into space , blow up earth, contact a cyborg race of humans from the future on a dif world line give them my now primitive technology in hopes of taking my dna and other like attributes and replicating humans and altering there dna untill i back breed ever being in the universe leading me to meet god and ultimately beeting him at chess. I WIN!
At this time, Ill be that old crazy man, days from death saying "Back in my day. we didnt have our fancy computer makers and holographic gadgets, we had smartphones , tv, and our computers only had 3GB of Ram! would you belive it?"
The best that money can't buy...today's system of money won't allow for this to be available. Theoretically it would be too costly to produce, and it will cost too much for one person to buy. But hey, if money was really no object, this would be possible to produce. If the profit motive wasn't holding us back, everyone would have this by now.
@wolfyys Yes you are absolutely right; but you forgot Moore's Law.
Also nanomachines in the age of true nanotech will most likely be Von-Neuman machines, which build from one to millions exponentially until there are enough to nanofacture or modify or even transmute whatever the nanites were designed for. This system was described in Eric Drexler's book Nanosystems, in the 90s. Think how it sounded then - and now that we HAVE some nanotech, people still scoff! Incredible!
Actually the funny thing about that statement that Bill Gates made is funny.
A laptop with 4GB of ram actually has 4294967296KB of ram, not only 4 million or so.
Your laptop actually has 4194304 Megabytes, not kilobytes, so its a factor of 10 greater than what you thought it was. Thats exponential growth for you.
excellent way to reconstruct human tissues to restore life to dead people...nanobots injected into people frozen in cryonic suspension can be rebuild based on DNA blue prints fixing any molecular structure in the human body damaged by disease, aging or freezing. Then person is woken to a world where everything is made by nanomachines...free of labor or costs with near perfect design.
nanotechnology is alien technology, alien-made, not man-made ! we need to seriously question this type of technology because there's alot of negative uses for this stuff, & they're keeping this type of technology out of public inquiry !
they can also latch on to your neurons & use frequencies to change your perceptions of your environment !
Fascinating although unbelievable video - however I guess we can see by nature that this is within the realms of possibility. How does a potato grow - how does a baby grow in the womb ? Isn't this all wet nano at it's finest. We must iron out all the crinks but long term this is pheasable and will change the world and manufacturing drastically. I hope we can all have our personal nano manipulator in our kitchen one day ( creating all my favourite meals )
@mikkister this is all well and good but how the hell would you make repairs or make the parts to begin with? would you have a large machine make a smaller machine? then that machine makes an even smaller machine? and so on so forth. it seems kind of illogical at this stage of human technology
A note on scale and time. A carbon atom is 67pm across. Each small block looks about 10 atoms wide, and each large block is 10 small blocks across; thus 6.7nm wide. The Final Assembly Machines are about 10 blocks apart, so at normal speed, each FAM would finish a 670x670x670nm block per second.
At that speed the super-laptop (which looks to be about 6.7cm thick) would have a build time of 100,000 seconds, or just under 28 hours.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Maybe we are going about this the wrong way... Maybe we could just shrink all the Mexicans and put them in an old shoe box... It would also solve the immigration problem...
hehe. Me and my friend where having a software vs hardware fight and he said that you could "print" 3D objects. I told him he was stupid, but now who's laughing?
Even if we don't get as far as the singularity, we're still gonna have some awesome technologies in our lifetime, and that is still something to be very excited about. :)
Ive been trying to tell my friends and family about the fact we will live forever and they dont even disagree. They seem to shrug it off like I didnt even say anything, like thats not important. Even when I give extensive examples of ALREADY existing tech that will lead us to the GNR revolutions (genetics, nanotech, robotics) they just seem to ignore it. Ignorant fools.
@ataraxic89 We're never going to live forever, nor will the government ever give the populace access to the technology even if a magical treatment method ever came into conception. Let's face it, a population that grows exponentially will only lead to overpopulation, a depletion of resources, and eventually our own deaths. Highly relative to cancer cells.
@NoobsAreUsh We will live forever, not everyone. But the technology will exist and I highly doubt they will outlaw it, they will want it too. Its not magical at all, that just shows how ignorant you really are about it. You know nothing and dismiss it because it sounds far fetched to your limited imagination and intellect. You also ignore the other tech that will be available. Like nanotech to recycle 100% and better space tech for colonizing and space stations. Fool.
@ataraxic89 Without evidence, all your talk of mystical scientific advances is just a fantasy. I've shown my side of the argument, and you try to insult me. No wonder nobody takes you seriously.
@NoobsAreUsh I can only fit so much into 500 characters you know.. Your side? whats that? no info at all and the ASSUMPTION that EVERY government on earth would prevent it. ONE simple example is that we recently, though genetic technology, REVERSED aged in lab rats. Yes this is early but it means we can seriously affect the rate of aging. One day we will end the genetic reasons for aging and then use nanites to help repair cellular damage. Also uploading our minds into computers is immortality.
@vman456 10 is cutting it a bit close, but definitely 20 or 30 years. Sooner if you are wealthy and can afford new treatments of course.
2030 is the year to watch I think. A great confluence of different science fields will begin gathering momentum at that time. Our place in the universe, our abilities and our lifestyles will all begin to change rapidly and fundamentally around 2030. Only a global catastrophe could hinder this process.
@vman456 I'd say it's more like fifteen, but yeah I agree with you. A great deal of people in developed nations have a shot at it. Get ready for plenty of war, famine, and environmental destruction, though. And massive waves of immigrants. Best bet is north Europe in my opinion. Do some research on Denmark, Sweden, Norway, etc. They're looking pretty swell.
I just hope this technology will be utilized for the well being of the human race and the entire planet as a whole. If so, then I am really looking forward to it.
Support your local nanoscientist! Anyone who doesn't recognise the potential of this amazing technology should sod off and live in a hole with the rest of the scaremongering luddites. To the quality types, see you in Bladerunner! Woohoo!
Honestly... If We Were To Stop Researching Foolish Other Pursuits In The General Area Of This Technology... And Put All Our Energy Into Creating An Assembler... We Could Have Just One... Create Nano Machines That Do All The Work For Us....
We Just Need One... To Make The Rest.... Its A Simple Scenario... Just A-lot Of Energy Initially To Bring It To Fruitage... Considering Most People Are Wearing... Nano Technology It Is Not At All Far Off.... Also... Look Into Oled's That's Incredible.
so... you want to create a machine that's too small to directly destroy, and give that machine the task of duplicating itself indefinitely? yep, we're all going to die
God save the computer scientists (myself included). We are going to need some pretty clever breakthroughs in software to be able to fully utilize 1 billion cores. Parallel processing insanity...
this is complete bullshit. billions of molecular sized machines with conveyor belts ant stuff like that? humanity will destroy itself, not make shit like this. and that will happen because idiots like this one "knows" what will be in the future but they dont seem to improve now do they?
and it's negative, unoptimistic people like you who are causing humanity to "destroy itself". have a little faith. at the exponential rate that technology is increasing, especially these days, this could be perfectly doable within the next 10-20 years.
people said we would have flying cars by 2000. flying cars? were at 2009 and were in a fucking crysis. we would be lucky to live for the next 10 years.retard. you people allways look into the future, but you take no note to the problems of the present. there are thousands of children starving and you shitheads talk about a bright future in the next 10-20 years. im sorry, but you sir - are retarded.
that's a poor reply to what i said.What does my age have to do with you being retarded OR just failing to accept the truth? Admit it im telling the truth, unless you post some good arguments i don't think you could prove me wrong. Either accept the truth, or stop being a retarded ape and open you're eyes. WOW im 14 y/o, for all you know i could be 5 years old and you're intelligence could be dust compared to mine.
first off, you are extremely arrogant and immature. second, no, you are not telling the truth. you've been listening to alarmist nutjobs for too long. mankind is not going to "destroy itself". compared to how things used to be in ancient and medieval times, we are living in some of the safest and most peaceful times mankind has ever seen. we are making great leaps in science, medicine, etc. technology is increasing exponentially, so in 10 years we could be twice as advances as we are now.
if everybody had your attitude, we would be about 50x worse off. nothing would get done, everybody would be even more pissed at each other, and there would be a lot more wars. sure, we could get into a nuclear war or something and destroy ourselves, but the most you can do is hope for the best. with the attitude you have you're not helping anyone or anything.
good point, but were all a little different aren't we? That's what makes our world so interesting.But that's not the point is it? We've taken this discussion deeper than the original topic. All im trying to say is that it's really quite stupid to predict machines of such level. People could go try to find a vaccine for a disease, or do something useful, instead of drawing crappy 3d animations of really retarded things. I looked up you're channel, you're 23 and have a similar taste in music :}
true, it's pretty hard to predict things like this, but you can't just automatically dismiss something because it sounds ambitious. before airplanes were invented, most people thought it was impossible to make an airplane. but who knows, i guess we'll have to wait and see where technology goes.
oh, and it's always nice to meet a fellow metal fan \,,/
lol i wanted to see some nanotechnology applications for my project, and here i see two fellow metalheads arguing, tsk tsk :P
these things are not really fictional guys, nanotechnology is serious business, and it's yet to be improved, it's at its baby levels only now. but still there are current applications widely used, so this is not just crappy animation of "retarded things", it's something useful.
so what, only metalheads are watching these videos? :P \m/
All impossible, prehaps in 500 years they will be working on an atomic level with machines moving atoms to make things, but they wont have atom sized machines...
Technology increases exponentially. Look into Ray Kurzweil and the coming singularity if you want to understand how this kind of technology and much more will 'tidal-wave' upon us in the next 20 to 30 years. We already have nanobots that can fight cancer, regulate insulin, and regulate oxygen. They've tested them on animals.
they can already make atomic machines and move atoms around one at a time to make a product,thats old news look it up revorocks. doing it on a large scale like this, and make it available to every computer owner in the world, is a hell of alot more then 50 to a 100 years away mr.conservative.
Technology increases exponentially. Look into Ray Kurzweil and the coming singularity if you want to understand how this kind of technology and much more will 'tidal-wave' upon us in the next 20 to 30 years. We already have nanobots that can fight cancer, regulate insulin, and regulate oxygen. They've tested them on animals.
I dont pretend to be a genius. But the biggest and hardest step in my mind is producing those first set of tools, in order to make more tools. These first tools would have to be made by hand practically am I right?
i think it's a delibrate push to slow down development of universal assemblers. I think the need to devise ways to work around the dangers is one aspect behind it and just plain needing people to talk about what the reality is in terms of CHANGE from every previous way of thinking.
anything can be "animated" using a computer - what is being represented in this video is way to complex. think of all the moving parts in side of a car engine... better yet a gear driving watch... show me the insides of those machines... what makes'em tick?
I'd give everything I own to own one of these machines!!! I want one invented NOW!!! At least before I'm dead.
Krakolio 2 weeks ago
They could scan the atomic structure of anything and programme in into this to make an exact copy! People could own exact copies of: the declaration of independance, billy the kid's gun, some of the world's first computers, anything! (Those were just some random things I would like to have btw.)
SEB1991SEB 2 weeks ago
I better be alive when this is common.
DataEAstJ 1 month ago
@fyrverkerimamma yeah, that's called open source
senoner90 3 months ago
@fyrverkerimamma somehow I think the concept of "we make household item and you buy it" will become obsolete at that point. So as "ownership" and "copyrights".
Armuotas 4 months ago
imagine the vidya you could play on that laptop . . .
LlortnA 4 months ago
Look at any work of art. If you could duplicate
exactly the first atom and it's position, and then the next and the
next, you would end with a perfect copy of the whole,
indistinguishable from the original in every way, including
the so-called "moral value" of the art itself. Nothing can
transcend its smallest elements. -SMAC
NayasNew 4 months ago
I'd love to see nanotechnology be made for purely defensive purposes before they go into any ventures of fabrication/AI/Medicinal uses. Let's learn how to use these to defend ourselves from everything we already have, before we venture into something that could potentially kill us all, in more ways than one.
And by the way, what happens when just one of those millions of little machines breaks down?
Bountyart 7 months ago
I thought this was going to be one of those vids where a ghoul suddenly pops in front of you, screaming.
drawswithcrayon 8 months ago
if we ever get personal replicators we're going to run into 'piracy' issues
Zareste 9 months ago 2
@Zareste If you have a machine that is able to make things from molecules then what stops it from making food? or clothes or replicate itself from dust and dirt? If a machine like this sees the light of day the consequences will be far bigger than just piracy. It will change society as we know it.
cyberlord64 8 months ago
@Zareste I'll replicate pirates. Bwahahaha
wcfcarolina13 8 months ago
@Zareste Nanosocialism!
lamorte42 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if you have Jesus, you don't need technology to live forever, and I plan to, and it is not going to cost me one penny, people of the earth enjoy what little time you have left, cause God will soon come to take it away from you and make it the Paradise it is suppose to be/
persevere67 9 months ago
@persevere67 haha you can't kill anyone this is a comment box
Zareste 9 months ago
@persevere67 you go ahead and keep believing in your fairy tail while I turn immortal and rich beyond your wildest dreams into a true paradise that actually exists and one that wasn't made up from a science fiction book like the bible
Nev3rdie00 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@persevere67 What evidence do you have for any of this?
Keitaro2011 8 months ago
@persevere67 Shut the fuck you you deluded brainwashed fucking Christian, go join your unicorn while we advance and live for ever.
elidrissii 8 months ago
@persevere67 Why are you using a computer? scientists made it. you don't deserve to use anything that is a product of science.
behnamasid 8 months ago
@persevere67 The sun is setting on the age of ignorance and ideology, my friend. I suggest investing your spirituality where it deserves to be --- the unity of man, nature, and technology. Best of wishes,
wcfcarolina13 8 months ago
2020 - Nanotechnology is in place for industrial, agricultural and medical applications,
2025 - US found poorly educated because they ditched 'evolutionism' 'Darwinism' and 'Naturalism' for christian science after protest.
2030 - US sits on stockpiles of nukes, demands China and europe provide their fat butts with resources then launch nukes but when those nukes are obliterated by nano interceptors they spit teeth at each other.
2040 - US adopts new sciences beginning with Lamark evolution.
ganados0 10 months ago 7
@ganados0 That sounds like a very plausible anti-doomsday situation haha. Frickin America, I swear 98% of the time I feel like a foreigner here. By the way I'm glad I'm not the only one that realizes that we can create effective nuke shields by deploying a nano-cloud that disintegrates anything the system identifies as dangerous. So many people think that offense is the only thing that's going to advance. Defense advances as well, jeez.
wcfcarolina13 8 months ago
Nuclear fusion energy (free energy) and replicators (nanotech assemblers) will render money and economics null and void. Can't wait for the Star Trek future!
henik9 10 months ago
is this as powerful as the quantum computer or is this the nano assembled quantum computer? how exactly powerful is qc in comparison to pc?
darcon81 11 months ago
so one day its 1ghz 1gb iphone the next day its a billion time better and thats 3exhz 2exb.
Or in other words we can create drugs,booze,diamonds, stem cells, money, gas,petrol,
haha but still, the future nerds will have a billion times better pc and still no pussy.
panzarw 1 year ago
@panzarw
True.
They will have interactive digital pussy.
LithuanianLabas 1 year ago
What what was the time duration of that process? An hour? five hours? A minute?
kermitcintronsucks 1 year ago
I would make infinite ammo for all my guns. And unlimited gas for my truck.
WTF1920 1 year ago
@WTF1920 Nanotechnology does not equal violation of the laws of thermodynamics, fool. To simplify that in terms you can understand, it doesn't allow you to pull bullets or gasoline out of your ass. Real life nanotech (not the silly shit you are thinking of) will be an extremely limited use technology, with nieche applications limited to computer fabrication (as was demonstrated here). There are very good reasons in support of this stance, none of which you would comprehend.
TheJamesrocket 1 year ago
@TheJamesrocket
So let me get this straight, this "Nanotech Assembler" would be able to create a computer with billions of times more power than todays best...yet it wouldn't be able to make a simple piece of lead with a thin coppen coating? Dude, Whatever.
WTF1920 1 year ago
@WTF1920 Haha, shows how much you know on the subject! Fact is, the larger the object is, the less precision it can be manufactured with by nanotechnology. Production time is also far longer than competing technologys. Nanotech would only be usefull for medicinal uses, or fabricating small objects (hmm, kind of like those electronic components you mentioned). Dumbass.
TheJamesrocket 1 year ago
@TheJamesrocket
You're starting to annoy the hell out of me. If someone is wrong about something, you can say it in a way that won't make you sound like a dickhead.
WTF1920 1 year ago
@WTF1920 Believe me, there is a fine line between enthusiasm and wankery, just as there is about ignorance and stupidity. You, sir, have crossed that line.
TheJamesrocket 1 year ago
@TheJamesrocket
That's it, you're done.
WTF1920 1 year ago
@TheJamesrocket there already exists nanotechnology that turns dirt and air in to food, we call them plants.
egokick 11 months ago
If robots, computers, nanotech and anything else not mentioned, how or why even use money? Seriously, I see it as pointless, by that time the culture should be able to comprehend how to interact in such a high tech society.
JoeTube27 1 year ago
Diamond-casing for my laptops... I wish. lol
Oh! Make me a smartphone that would have the processing power of an i7 core processor equipped desktop!
EdouardDubois 1 year ago
I'd make a telescope.
vid828 1 year ago
i came
daniellos333 1 year ago
can it make woopy? hahahah Can it make..hmmmm a human skull?
Grindednigg 1 year ago
@Grindednigg - haha. What would you do with it?
vid828 1 year ago
@vid828 actually i was wondering if it could replicate human bones to perfection enabling us to build cyborgs with these things.. bwahahahaha they need to make a movie about that.. lol take over the world.. oh yeah i robot and terminator. dang
Grindednigg 1 year ago
@Grindednigg Umm, no, you are heavily mistaken. I don't see how the hell using nanotech to straighten bones out = posthuman, or why anyone would think they need nanotechnology to do that in the first place.
Wrong tool.
Gene engineering would allow you to do much more than merely straighten bones, it would give you bones that have triple the yield strength of the ones you have now, bullet resistant skin (like an elephant or rhino), and muscles capable of far greater exertion. You wouldn't be
TheJamesrocket 1 year ago
superman, more like luke cage. Thats still vastly, vastly better than the weak bodies we are encumbered with today. Likewise, I doubt the kind of associations we make with cyborgism will turn out to be realistic in the future. People won't be walking around with pipes and shit sticking out from their body. Cybernetic implants will likely be designed to conform to aesthetic trends.
TheJamesrocket 1 year ago
@Grindednigg it was an attempt at humor guy. lol you internet nerds love to flex your brain muscles so much you are oblivious to a joke. Of course at the same time there is alot of untold potential to these machines so whats to say im wrong? if its building things on a molecular structure why couldnt you make anything? provided that the amino acids and proteins were there you could have infinite outcomes. :)
Grindednigg 11 months ago
@Grindednigg and id prob make a 14th crystal skull and store the sum off human knowledge in it then make a daring escape into space , blow up earth, contact a cyborg race of humans from the future on a dif world line give them my now primitive technology in hopes of taking my dna and other like attributes and replicating humans and altering there dna untill i back breed ever being in the universe leading me to meet god and ultimately beeting him at chess. I WIN!
Grindednigg 11 months ago
Damn... Hey, how do they even think they are supposed to build all that?
MultifrugtjuiceOMG 1 year ago
At this time, Ill be that old crazy man, days from death saying "Back in my day. we didnt have our fancy computer makers and holographic gadgets, we had smartphones , tv, and our computers only had 3GB of Ram! would you belive it?"
Oh grandpa and your rapidly fading memory.
Pieishman 1 year ago
The end of human labor slavery! I expect this in the 80s of this century
max10wonderboy 1 year ago 5
@max10wonderboy We could actually do this with what we know today! :) YouTube search "Moving Forward"
SourRevenge 1 week ago
we will need molecular robots to repair the machine in this facility..... :)
sukumarstock 1 year ago
When will this be possible?
kermitcintronsucks 1 year ago
@kermitcintronsucks its predicted for 2050/60s i think, long way i know :(
I cant even imagine the things i will make!
walker1054 1 year ago
The best that money can't buy...today's system of money won't allow for this to be available. Theoretically it would be too costly to produce, and it will cost too much for one person to buy. But hey, if money was really no object, this would be possible to produce. If the profit motive wasn't holding us back, everyone would have this by now.
xchainlinkx 1 year ago
@xchainlinkx Sorry but you are wrong.
Your attitude reflects the constant that progress is impossible because it is very hard/expensive to do at this moment in time.
Do you honestly think modern home computers were thought possible 30-40 years ago?, much less affordable.
Your PC if taken back to the 60s/70s would be worth $TRILLIONS
why isnt it expensive now?, simple its called progress.
remember this famous saying;
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers,"
wolfyys 1 year ago
Comment removed
magnifixcat 1 year ago
Comment removed
magnifixcat 1 year ago
@wolfyys Yes you are absolutely right; but you forgot Moore's Law.
Also nanomachines in the age of true nanotech will most likely be Von-Neuman machines, which build from one to millions exponentially until there are enough to nanofacture or modify or even transmute whatever the nanites were designed for. This system was described in Eric Drexler's book Nanosystems, in the 90s. Think how it sounded then - and now that we HAVE some nanotech, people still scoff! Incredible!
Sry > rmvd, hard2post.
magnifixcat 1 year ago
@wolfyys yeah and another thing bill gates said ages ago
"Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM"
My laptop right now has 4,000,000kb of RAM (if thats 4gb)
walker1054 1 year ago
@walker1054
Actually the funny thing about that statement that Bill Gates made is funny.
A laptop with 4GB of ram actually has 4294967296KB of ram, not only 4 million or so.
Your laptop actually has 4194304 Megabytes, not kilobytes, so its a factor of 10 greater than what you thought it was. Thats exponential growth for you.
ltsmba 1 year ago
I hope this becomes real, would be awesome
PL1putnamehere 1 year ago
Forget software piracy, we'll have physical item piracy.
supertrinko 1 year ago
no they r supposed to enter the consumer market in around 2062
karim3343 1 year ago
How hypothetical is all of this?
smokenfly514 1 year ago
How there gunna make tiny working robotic parts at a molecular scale IDK, but this would be awesome although unrealistic at the day and age.
jaydenkanecurtis 1 year ago
I came. Literally.
DrCowenstein 1 year ago
@DrCowenstein Yummy
jaydenkanecurtis 1 year ago
Somehow I see religion slowing this process down.
ballsdeep69ish 1 year ago 26
@ballsdeep69ish nano machines that may be able to cure all disease of the body is probably going to be the anti-christ
andrewfink1 4 months ago
@ballsdeep69ish no, i see capitalism slow this process down
senoner90 3 months ago
How the fuck is this related to gmod???
doggygomoo 1 year ago
I want some in my eyes so I can have night vision and lasers like Superman!
TheAnarchist33 1 year ago
Can you have it make me one of those?
Cschive 1 year ago
can it make my homework?
lvdmonstarr 1 year ago 26
@lvdmonstarr unfortunately no, unless it is A.I.
Kemal3007 1 year ago
@lvdmonstarr It can make you a laptop with the fucking homework on it!
lamorte42 6 months ago
it's a motherfucking replicator.
motherofgod.jpg
kylesteinhauser 1 year ago
excellent way to reconstruct human tissues to restore life to dead people...nanobots injected into people frozen in cryonic suspension can be rebuild based on DNA blue prints fixing any molecular structure in the human body damaged by disease, aging or freezing. Then person is woken to a world where everything is made by nanomachines...free of labor or costs with near perfect design.
DK0526 2 years ago 3
LMAO 1 billion CPU's. A little bit overkill there don't you think? XD
pinkistoughjj 2 years ago
@pinkistoughjj
nope.
clbgeballe 2 years ago
@clbgeballe lol
pinkistoughjj 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nanotechnology is alien technology, alien-made, not man-made ! we need to seriously question this type of technology because there's alot of negative uses for this stuff, & they're keeping this type of technology out of public inquiry !
they can also latch on to your neurons & use frequencies to change your perceptions of your environment !
folly4444 2 years ago
if something broke, youd be f'd
ScoringDesert 2 years ago
my god I never thought of this. It seems like sci-fi!
GuiMarquito 2 years ago
Fascinating although unbelievable video - however I guess we can see by nature that this is within the realms of possibility. How does a potato grow - how does a baby grow in the womb ? Isn't this all wet nano at it's finest. We must iron out all the crinks but long term this is pheasable and will change the world and manufacturing drastically. I hope we can all have our personal nano manipulator in our kitchen one day ( creating all my favourite meals )
mikkister 2 years ago 2
@mikkister this is all well and good but how the hell would you make repairs or make the parts to begin with? would you have a large machine make a smaller machine? then that machine makes an even smaller machine? and so on so forth. it seems kind of illogical at this stage of human technology
zaperatus 2 years ago
@zaperatus you don't have even a slighest idea what kinda technology they are using right now..
laitela01 1 year ago
@laitela01 your right, i don't
zaperatus 1 year ago
A note on scale and time. A carbon atom is 67pm across. Each small block looks about 10 atoms wide, and each large block is 10 small blocks across; thus 6.7nm wide. The Final Assembly Machines are about 10 blocks apart, so at normal speed, each FAM would finish a 670x670x670nm block per second.
At that speed the super-laptop (which looks to be about 6.7cm thick) would have a build time of 100,000 seconds, or just under 28 hours.
anticarrrot 2 years ago
Looks like real life World of Goo.
lazyorc 2 years ago
after 100years
Th3ViiRuS 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Maybe we are going about this the wrong way... Maybe we could just shrink all the Mexicans and put them in an old shoe box... It would also solve the immigration problem...
INGRAM0009 2 years ago
lol
ScoringDesert 2 years ago
hehe. Me and my friend where having a software vs hardware fight and he said that you could "print" 3D objects. I told him he was stupid, but now who's laughing?
13Knives1 2 years ago
I WANNA BECOME 529 years old!!!!
yared94 2 years ago
Can it make organic stuff, like an apple?
theinsane102 2 years ago
It can make anything, from anything.
An apple from dirt, or garbage.
tartsphere 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
theinsane102 2 years ago
I hope I live long enough to see that
JanJahMan 2 years ago 7
look 20 years ago at the computers available in those days...
and then take into account that you will most likely live longer then your parents
so probably you will :)
princeofexcess 2 years ago
If you can manage to stay alive another 10 years then you'll have the chance at living forever.
vman456 2 years ago 30
@vman456 when will this machine become reality do you no the expected time
lusaka99 1 year ago
@lusaka99
Uhh, it could be anywhere between 20-100, though I'd say around 40-50.
vman456 1 year ago
@vman456 that's long time i heard the first stage will be in 2015
lusaka99 1 year ago
@vman456 Not convinced, but it'd be nice.
Am I the only guy who thinks that the whole "singularity" thing would be great if it happened, but it'll never happen?
3Gyro 1 year ago
@3Gyro
Let me put it this way:
Even if we don't get as far as the singularity, we're still gonna have some awesome technologies in our lifetime, and that is still something to be very excited about. :)
vman456 1 year ago
Ive been trying to tell my friends and family about the fact we will live forever and they dont even disagree. They seem to shrug it off like I didnt even say anything, like thats not important. Even when I give extensive examples of ALREADY existing tech that will lead us to the GNR revolutions (genetics, nanotech, robotics) they just seem to ignore it. Ignorant fools.
ataraxic89 11 months ago
@ataraxic89 We're never going to live forever, nor will the government ever give the populace access to the technology even if a magical treatment method ever came into conception. Let's face it, a population that grows exponentially will only lead to overpopulation, a depletion of resources, and eventually our own deaths. Highly relative to cancer cells.
NoobsAreUsh 11 months ago
@NoobsAreUsh We will live forever, not everyone. But the technology will exist and I highly doubt they will outlaw it, they will want it too. Its not magical at all, that just shows how ignorant you really are about it. You know nothing and dismiss it because it sounds far fetched to your limited imagination and intellect. You also ignore the other tech that will be available. Like nanotech to recycle 100% and better space tech for colonizing and space stations. Fool.
ataraxic89 11 months ago
@ataraxic89 Without evidence, all your talk of mystical scientific advances is just a fantasy. I've shown my side of the argument, and you try to insult me. No wonder nobody takes you seriously.
NoobsAreUsh 11 months ago
@NoobsAreUsh I can only fit so much into 500 characters you know.. Your side? whats that? no info at all and the ASSUMPTION that EVERY government on earth would prevent it. ONE simple example is that we recently, though genetic technology, REVERSED aged in lab rats. Yes this is early but it means we can seriously affect the rate of aging. One day we will end the genetic reasons for aging and then use nanites to help repair cellular damage. Also uploading our minds into computers is immortality.
ataraxic89 11 months ago
@vman456 10 is cutting it a bit close, but definitely 20 or 30 years. Sooner if you are wealthy and can afford new treatments of course.
2030 is the year to watch I think. A great confluence of different science fields will begin gathering momentum at that time. Our place in the universe, our abilities and our lifestyles will all begin to change rapidly and fundamentally around 2030. Only a global catastrophe could hinder this process.
Alectr0n 10 months ago
@vman456 I'd say it's more like fifteen, but yeah I agree with you. A great deal of people in developed nations have a shot at it. Get ready for plenty of war, famine, and environmental destruction, though. And massive waves of immigrants. Best bet is north Europe in my opinion. Do some research on Denmark, Sweden, Norway, etc. They're looking pretty swell.
wcfcarolina13 8 months ago
@vman456 Say what??
CLSkill 7 months ago
I was hoping some hella delicious chicken was going to pop out.
billybobthortansbro 2 years ago
food can be organized like this no problem
its much easier then laptops
especially if you want it to be consistent and u dont care about looks
imagine having something like this cook for you everyday
something really really good XD
princeofexcess 2 years ago
100 hour battery life isn't enough, I need at least 100 trillion hour battery life.
xXAkridXx 2 years ago
they think 100 hours is enough? who the fuck are these people?! XD
enslaved90 2 years ago
Exactly, we talking about the future! Mah current laptop last longer than 100 hours, WTF!? nano laptop should be way moar.
xXAkridXx 2 years ago
the best laptops today have a battery life of 8 hours :P
SeaTownTrouT 2 years ago 3
Well then, apparently I have bad time management skills.
xXAkridXx 2 years ago
programmable matter, foglets, mems, replicators, catoms, and quantum dots are all names for this technology!!
2020 low 2025 moderate 2030 extremely high and 2040 singularity!! banzai for immortality!!
p.s.-- read up on Ray Kurzweil, he is fascinating at the things he predicts as futurist: source Moore's Law!!
rimpick 2 years ago
I just hope this technology will be utilized for the well being of the human race and the entire planet as a whole. If so, then I am really looking forward to it.
enslaved90 2 years ago
Me too. if it is, then there will be golden age to look forward too unlike ever before.
rimpick 2 years ago
Support your local nanoscientist! Anyone who doesn't recognise the potential of this amazing technology should sod off and live in a hole with the rest of the scaremongering luddites. To the quality types, see you in Bladerunner! Woohoo!
mctagnutandfries 3 years ago 4
Right on! Nano-technology is the future!
AlienScientist 3 years ago
nano-tech = killer virus
theinsane101 2 years ago
Comment removed
Doyalwcheese 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
couldn't nano-tech mean the end to killer viruses?
Doyalwcheese 2 years ago
grey goo!
xXAkridXx 2 years ago
one billion cpus lol!
UFOMAN618 3 years ago
The Olsen Twins would lose all popularity, you could produce as many Olsens as you wanted!
Robikus 3 years ago
oh god no!!
theinsane101 2 years ago
HEY, thats the laptop i use...
yourtiy 3 years ago
This is kind of scary to me.
Mca55hole 3 years ago
Honestly... If We Were To Stop Researching Foolish Other Pursuits In The General Area Of This Technology... And Put All Our Energy Into Creating An Assembler... We Could Have Just One... Create Nano Machines That Do All The Work For Us....
We Just Need One... To Make The Rest.... Its A Simple Scenario... Just A-lot Of Energy Initially To Bring It To Fruitage... Considering Most People Are Wearing... Nano Technology It Is Not At All Far Off.... Also... Look Into Oled's That's Incredible.
dijasom 3 years ago 2
so... you want to create a machine that's too small to directly destroy, and give that machine the task of duplicating itself indefinitely? yep, we're all going to die
siremorich 3 years ago
oh shit, i hope we dont give them AI we will get raped, they could build weapons -_-
yourtiy 3 years ago
This will be a reality in 20 years. Private sector permitting.
toddclemmer 3 years ago
God save the computer scientists (myself included). We are going to need some pretty clever breakthroughs in software to be able to fully utilize 1 billion cores. Parallel processing insanity...
tree6014 3 years ago
0_o 1 billion cpus 100hour battery life...WOW!!!
xsiranthrax 3 years ago
this is complete bullshit. billions of molecular sized machines with conveyor belts ant stuff like that? humanity will destroy itself, not make shit like this. and that will happen because idiots like this one "knows" what will be in the future but they dont seem to improve now do they?
dawgsezwuf 3 years ago
and it's negative, unoptimistic people like you who are causing humanity to "destroy itself". have a little faith. at the exponential rate that technology is increasing, especially these days, this could be perfectly doable within the next 10-20 years.
ryandood 3 years ago
people said we would have flying cars by 2000. flying cars? were at 2009 and were in a fucking crysis. we would be lucky to live for the next 10 years.retard. you people allways look into the future, but you take no note to the problems of the present. there are thousands of children starving and you shitheads talk about a bright future in the next 10-20 years. im sorry, but you sir - are retarded.
dawgsezwuf 3 years ago
that's a lot of wisdom coming from a 14-year old. *rolls eyes*
ryandood 3 years ago
that's a poor reply to what i said.What does my age have to do with you being retarded OR just failing to accept the truth? Admit it im telling the truth, unless you post some good arguments i don't think you could prove me wrong. Either accept the truth, or stop being a retarded ape and open you're eyes. WOW im 14 y/o, for all you know i could be 5 years old and you're intelligence could be dust compared to mine.
dawgsezwuf 3 years ago
first off, you are extremely arrogant and immature. second, no, you are not telling the truth. you've been listening to alarmist nutjobs for too long. mankind is not going to "destroy itself". compared to how things used to be in ancient and medieval times, we are living in some of the safest and most peaceful times mankind has ever seen. we are making great leaps in science, medicine, etc. technology is increasing exponentially, so in 10 years we could be twice as advances as we are now.
ryandood 3 years ago
if everybody had your attitude, we would be about 50x worse off. nothing would get done, everybody would be even more pissed at each other, and there would be a lot more wars. sure, we could get into a nuclear war or something and destroy ourselves, but the most you can do is hope for the best. with the attitude you have you're not helping anyone or anything.
ryandood 3 years ago
good point, but were all a little different aren't we? That's what makes our world so interesting.But that's not the point is it? We've taken this discussion deeper than the original topic. All im trying to say is that it's really quite stupid to predict machines of such level. People could go try to find a vaccine for a disease, or do something useful, instead of drawing crappy 3d animations of really retarded things. I looked up you're channel, you're 23 and have a similar taste in music :}
dawgsezwuf 3 years ago
true, it's pretty hard to predict things like this, but you can't just automatically dismiss something because it sounds ambitious. before airplanes were invented, most people thought it was impossible to make an airplane. but who knows, i guess we'll have to wait and see where technology goes.
oh, and it's always nice to meet a fellow metal fan \,,/
ryandood 3 years ago
I must say you sound intelligent for only being 14. Just saying. :P
dijasom 3 years ago
thanks, people around me call me smart because of my view of the world, and logic, although im REALLY bad at maths for example :)
dawgsezwuf 3 years ago
lol i wanted to see some nanotechnology applications for my project, and here i see two fellow metalheads arguing, tsk tsk :P
these things are not really fictional guys, nanotechnology is serious business, and it's yet to be improved, it's at its baby levels only now. but still there are current applications widely used, so this is not just crappy animation of "retarded things", it's something useful.
so what, only metalheads are watching these videos? :P \m/
flamey34 3 years ago
lol, i agree that nano technology is fact rather than fiction, but what this video shows is just dumb. silly nub.
dawgsezwuf 3 years ago
1 billion core? WOW :D
mikeriveraprod 3 years ago
Heh eh, she said molecular tooool. heh eh eh.
Robikus 3 years ago
*sigh* I wish I could see advances like this in my life time...
NikoKun 3 years ago
You probably will if you're under 40.
Robikus 3 years ago 3
Fabulous concept and I hope it comes true in my lifetime but I fear that this sort of nanotech is going to become the 'flying car' of yesteryear.
gnorville 3 years ago
yea i could make that machine easy...
All impossible, prehaps in 500 years they will be working on an atomic level with machines moving atoms to make things, but they wont have atom sized machines...
revorocks123 3 years ago
i think the best bet for nanofreaks is to mimic nature. Bionanotech is the way to go
manufacturing the actual machines on nanoscale is not a good idea imo
ActiveStorage 3 years ago
Actually 50 to 100 years is a conservative estimate. When the singularity hits this kind of thing will come upon us overnight.
Robikus 3 years ago
singularity?
wildanimalboy 3 years ago
Technology increases exponentially. Look into Ray Kurzweil and the coming singularity if you want to understand how this kind of technology and much more will 'tidal-wave' upon us in the next 20 to 30 years. We already have nanobots that can fight cancer, regulate insulin, and regulate oxygen. They've tested them on animals.
Robikus 3 years ago
they can already make atomic machines and move atoms around one at a time to make a product,thats old news look it up revorocks. doing it on a large scale like this, and make it available to every computer owner in the world, is a hell of alot more then 50 to a 100 years away mr.conservative.
2gbc 3 years ago
Technology increases exponentially. Look into Ray Kurzweil and the coming singularity if you want to understand how this kind of technology and much more will 'tidal-wave' upon us in the next 20 to 30 years. We already have nanobots that can fight cancer, regulate insulin, and regulate oxygen. They've tested them on animals.
Robikus 3 years ago
I still dont understand,is electricity required in order to generate them?How is it possible to store electricity inside these nanos if required?
kenneth0830 3 years ago
I like the nod to Powers of Ten
ratsouffle 3 years ago
so what comes after this the manipulation of string in the M theory or the String theory?
rimpick 3 years ago
why is it the size of a microwave why don't they come in a bigger sizes so we can create cars and spaceships for example?
rimpick 3 years ago
This is a household model. They probably would have industrial models too.
htgnef 3 years ago
AMAAAZINGG!!!!
axeflanker 3 years ago
I dont pretend to be a genius. But the biggest and hardest step in my mind is producing those first set of tools, in order to make more tools. These first tools would have to be made by hand practically am I right?
grooveclubhouse 3 years ago
That is why it is taking so long to get to that point. Once we have one of those nanomachines, we can make more.
htgnef 3 years ago 2
i think it's a delibrate push to slow down development of universal assemblers. I think the need to devise ways to work around the dangers is one aspect behind it and just plain needing people to talk about what the reality is in terms of CHANGE from every previous way of thinking.
damianpoirier 3 years ago
anything can be "animated" using a computer - what is being represented in this video is way to complex. think of all the moving parts in side of a car engine... better yet a gear driving watch... show me the insides of those machines... what makes'em tick?
Helixomni 3 years ago
Anyone thinking "replicators" from Stargate SG1 or Atlantis?
pmgodfrey 3 years ago