Through the Doppler effect, we can answer why we see 13.8 and 78 billion light years away. Nothing travels faster than light. If you imagine 100 galaxies in a straight line, and each one is away from the other 1% the speed of light, the first galaxy away from the last at the speed of light. In the universe, we have billions of galaxies in a straight line, so the last galaxy away faster than time passes. So we have more measures in the universe than the existence.
@RTRVII numa numa guy? You vegatable! He is spoiling a serious subject that does not involve this obese drama queen. He obviously has the brain of a 1 year old child. An exhibitionist with no friends and no life except for this show of stupidity. He is a Troglodite (Look it up!)
@niznet111 He did not choose to be in this video, the composer did. he didn't choose to be made to the "numa numa guy" he just posted a video of him dancing to music (what the fuck is wrong with that).
Why are you hating on less intelligent people? Blame the composer of this video instead.
Seems bollocks how can it b 78 billion light years away if they see it!!! Within 12 days. I'm not a scientist but if u travel for 12 days at speed of light woodnt u b at them planets in the ultra deep space shit????? Sorry for being blunt but it sounds shit.
@leemassey1 All we can see out to is 13.6 light years distance since the universe is 13.6 billion years old. You are quite right. I dunno how thy come up with 78 billion light years for the width of the universe though...
i love getting out of class(which is where we never learn about cool stuff like this) and coming to my apartment and just chillaxing while smoking a fat bowl to this video.
Sorry but the most important image ever taken is that of the earth as seen from Apollo 17. Our big blue planet does harbor life. Life so intellegent and advanced that we dare to seek and learn from that which is greater than ourselves. We are the only know species to have ever existed in 5 billion years on this planet to have reached out into the stars.
We ain't perfect, but were damn good! milan.usconsulate.gov/images/The_Earth_seen_from_Apollo_17.jpg
78,000,000,000 Lt. Yrs. Across. That would imply the edge, or the boundaries of the Universe had been found. Surely this can't be so! The Universe goes on into infinity, does it not?.....Fantastic video, bye the way!
What seems to be missing is the fact that every"thing" in the universe is not expanding; it's the separation between every"thing" that's expanding or increasing. It's not like gas particles or parts of a bomb suddenly exploding in a room, with bits and pieces blowing outward, diffusing and filling up the space. There is no room; there is no space to "fill up" or to expand into. It's the space between the bits and pieces that's increasing, expanding, separating all the bits and pieces.
Hey mikespindor & zidiffil, I believe you guys have said something real here. How can we see a star that has emitted its light several billion years more than our earth has existed and we can see it? Are the scientists wrong? Mere logic tells us that this can not be right. Someone is lying!!!!!!
@Frosty6677 if you go and look at the stars in the sky some of them dont even excist anymore they gone supernova it takes millions of years for there light to reach us so we can only it as the light hits us like the suns light takes 8 min to reach us
@Frosty6677 Why would you assume someone is lying when you don't fully understand. Do some research before coming to a conclusion. The Hubble ultra deep field image is 13 billion light years away (light that has recently appeared). Today, the galaxies have moved away from their original postion and their new lgiht hasn't reached us yet. And it won't reach us for a very, very long time. Same thing with the Sun. You see the Sun as it was 8min ago.
@Frosty6677 That's the same logic that says an outfielder can not have caught a fly ball because he wasn't under it when it was hit. Or how about my friend can not meet me at the airport because he was not there 5 hours ago when my plane took off. You were kidding right?
I agree with you. I cant understand why the Universe is 47 billion light years in radius, when the age is 13.7 Billion years approx. How can that be? How can scientists tell the distance in light years when the age in years is far less?
Probably the reason why the universe is 47 billon light years in radius is also due to the expansion of the universe. When you look at the hubble ultra deep field, scientists said that we are looking at 13 billion light years away. But thats only the light that appeared to us just recently; as of today, those galaxies have moved away from their original position. The light from their 'new positions' just haven't reached us yet, and won't for another few billions of years or so.
@mikespindor The speed of light is constant @ 186,000 miles per second, multiply that by the number of seconds in a year = 1 Lt. Yr. That is the DISTANCE that light travels in one year. ( sorry, there are not enough digits on my calculator) So when we look at the Hubble Ultra Deep Field today. We are seeing it as it was 13.7 Bn. Yrs. ago. So, today, in real terms. It's that distance, plus whatever distance it has traveled in those13.7 Bn. Yrs......if it still exists!
first we have to get out of this planet(if we wanna get to the truth) the Baddest VIRUS this Planet has...its called i.lluminati (over 300 familys,rockefellers,rothchild etc etc)..only if we get them out of nearly most of the goverments,politics etc etc in our world, Humantiy has a real chance of PEACE on EARTH to look forward to the Galaxy etc..but they still hungry for more money and Might..the are working on a NEW WORLD ORDER! were they controll everything on earth.Dont let this happen
@lzdsl0 thanks to hubble deep field we can see alot of pale blue dots? that could hold life like the one we are all on i would call that more inportant
@Ixions42 Its not all about the exposure time, above and beyond that the magnification needs to be increased. If it wasn't increased all you would get is the galaxies brighter? To increase the magnification you need extra lenses, and for each lens added the more photons are reflected and refracted away from the sensor. So we are getting close to the edge of our engineering ability. Or the sensor sise needs to be increased? again reaching edge of engineering ability unfortunately. Soon tho! :)
I'm afraid that I'm a bit lost. If our universe is only 13.something billion years old, why can we see galaxies that are 78 billion light years away from us? It would seem to me that the light wouldn't have have had enough time to reach us. What am I missing here? It would seem to me that we shouldn't be able to see anything beyond 13.something light years away!?!
photons from those galaxies left billions of years ago and the ones that reach earth are what you see in the telescope, at this time some of them may already be gone. the light you see from the sun left 8 minutes ago
---
also, not because you don't know something then you can't assume that everyone else doesn't either. if there WAS a God, and he showed himself to someone then they would really know. that may sound nuts, but it could also be true.
taleofsixstrings, you don't answer my question at all and don't seem to understand the question. To re-ask:- If the universe is obnly 13.something years old, how is it that we can see light from galaxies beyond 13.something light years distant? The light from them would not have had enough time to reach us yet. As for God, it's just that the whole thing is fucked up. The Bible tales are so far-fetched and none of it is supported by history. It is just nonsense, as in, NO SENSE.
I just posted a video that tries to answer your question. This is probably the most asked question on my channel. I hope you find the new video helpful.
which video was this?? I wondered that question, my guess would be the telescopes can see towards the light where as our eyes only see where the earth is.
@tdarnell I have another problem with the distance of the radius of 38 billion light years. That would mean that the light from an object reached us (Earth) after traveling 38 billion years. Shouldn't we try to consider how long it would have taken that object to get to that point in the first place? Also, since we are traveling through time at the same rate as the distant object, it has been traveling away from us for 38 billion years. It would seem that the universe is much bigger and older.
@zideffil It is due to the accelerating expansion of the universe. The universe is 13+ billion years old, but due to the acceleration of galaxies away from each other the distance between them has increased faster than the speed of light. It is not that objects are moving through space faster than the speed of light, it is that the fabric of space is expanding faster than the speed of light. Space is like an ocean, and the galaxies are like boats being pulled away by the rip currents.
@19raghu Uh,...what is an oppsite? Did you mean 'opposite', perchance? If you did, then I have the opposite of what? In other words, what are you talking about?
@ismokeot420420 Your supreme eggheadness, I SO humbly beg your pardon. I KNOW I don't deserve to be making comments on the same page with you. I SO regret not having taken space physics but having studied engineering instead. I can only imagine how insulted you may feel. I will refrain from asking such stupid questions in the future, of course. Could I possibly suggest Pepto-Bismol or a small explosive charge placed anally to help get you back on par?
@emptyboxesandrooms Thanks for your reply and I learned that shortly after having posted the comment. We still can't SEE beyond 13.6 light years away from us, it said on a science show I saw on TV the other night.
@zideffil its because the universe is rapidly expanding faster then the speed of light so as the light is rushing twords us the space between us and the star/ galaxy is increasing
-Tiniest star (red dwarf) = 0,03 AU (Astronomical unit) = 5-6million miles in radius.
-Biggest star (known so far) Name:Canis Majoris.
Canis majoris= 9,00 AU. Which is 9 x 150million = 1,350.000.000Miles in radios.
This is only the biggest star captured on tape. Not much farther then the frontier of our local galaxys cosmic gas arm. Which is only a small part of the milkyway. There are probably much bigger stars in the other parth of our galaxy and the other 100billions
@bronco2121 INDEED! I think you can multiply your number with it selft 10times and still not high enough. and thats big! And the fact that A lot of the stars has several planets around them just blows my mind. I mean, there has to be thousands of other planets with lives. Even hundres of thousands planets with life : S it's wicked!
No, if there are billions of galaxies, there is at least one that has life. So, yeah. I'm pretty sure there's more than one in our own galaxy. So, um. I think my mind was just blown.
@coleyfan well not really. unless you get into other dimension. say time (as a physical dimension) is set up like sheet of paper and we are drawn on each page. now flip through the book, if you flip through the book in 1 sec say it equals a lifetime. if you think about time as a dimension set up like this its possible that we exist in other dimensions, but not other galaxies or earths. in order to flip back you would have to travel farther from the earth faster than the speed of light. cont.
guess what, we'll never contact any other forms of life on any other earths, it just wont happen - this place called the universe is the definition of beauty though.....
Another possibility.. since our universe has expanded since the big bang 78B light years ago, and the size of the universe was much smaller, are we really looking at the past at one of the galaxies as the Milkyway? and in it our Sun in its very early stage of formation? Is this actually possible to see us in the past?
hmm, it's probably not possible to see us in the past since the light of our sun (and other stars) are shining outward and don't logically have a way to return to us. Interesting though.
ok, so let me get this straight, we know the condition a fraction of a second after the big bang, but not at or before.. so when we look this far back, we are seeing a much smaller and compressed universe in which we are supposedly be in it. no?
It's all about light and the speed of light. We can see other galaxies as they were in the past because their light is (or was) shining toward us. We cannot see ourselves because the light of us is shining outward.
To see ourselves in the past, we'd have to travel faster than the speed of light, and arrive at a point far away, thus being able to see the light of how we were. You're talking time travel :p
Could it be possible that what we're looking at in the deep field no longer exist? The galaxies are no longer there since we're really looking at 78 billions light years ago in the past ?
no such thing as a sin sex not a sin if i wasnt for sex we wouldnt be here in the end u are just a animal and animals kill each other all the time not a sin lying is what u do when u have no one who really knows u in the end we are all the same not a sin etcetcetc paslm get this (quote)when i die if u miss me just feel the wind or over turn a rock and i will be there from the 1st athiest and a man way ahead of his time and the most misunderstood person ever jesus knew he was not going anywere...
anyone that is religious that watches this and still dont get it mmm let me help u out go get on a (plane) because u r just part of a differant koko club i wish i could live till everyone ends up athiest hubbble is the thing we made 2 try 2 end this game of hide n seek with god ... lmao
S3AANNN, I don't know why you would think that the video strengthens the possibility of a god. No one on earth knows why the universe exists or if it was created by something or it just happened for no reason and when I encounter someone who says they do know, then I am SURE that I'm listening to a fool, a religious nut, or both.
I'm actually atheist, and i never said i know that there is a God or supreme being i was just saying that surely this would support that idea rather than disregard it. I didn't say this made me believe in any religion. I'd be happy to state my views on existance but not in a youtube comment.
NASA announced they found Planet X in 1983 then said it was a mistake.
They LIED!
This is what theyre hiding with the chemtrails sprayed every day globally. Its the reason for the increase in quakes and volcanoes and for the doomsday seed vault.
It is also the warning for the war of Armageddon which will see America destroyed by Russia, China and the SCO on the day of the next us/israeli false flag to invade Iran.
Unique circumstances. The Bible was written over a span of some 1,600 years, from 1513 B.C.E. to about 98 C.E. Many of the approximately 40 writers thus lived centuries apart. Their occupations were varied. Some were fishermen, others were shepherds or kings, and one was a physician.
Imagine asking 40 men from varied backgrounds to write a book, each writing a section. The writers live in a number of lands and do not all know one another. Some do not know what the others have written. Would you expect a book thus produced to be harmonious?
The Gospel writers did not color the facts in order to cast Jesus in a more favorable light. Rather, they reported honestly that he was born under humble circumstances into a working-class family, that he did not study at the prestigious schools of his day, and that the majority of his listeners rejected his message.—Matthew 27:25; Luke 2:4-7; John 7:15.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
(Psalm 73:1-14) Jonah told of his disobedience and the bad attitude he initially had when God showed mercy to repentant sinners. (Jonah 1:1-3; 3:10; 4:1-3) Matthew freely related that he had abandoned Jesus on the night of Jesus arrest.—Matthew 26:56.
Mistakes and shortcomings. The Bible writers openly admitted their own failures and weaknesses. Moses told of a mistake he made that cost him dearly. (Numbers 20:7-13) Asaph explained that for a time he found himself envying the prosperous life of the wicked.
A coin produced in the fourth century B.C.E. contains a similar description, identifying the Persian governor Mazaeus as ruler of the province Beyond the River.Accuracy in seemingly minor details is no small matter. If we can trust the Bible writers in even small details, should that not bolster our confidence in the other things they wrote?
Proper titles. There were many rulers on the world stage during the 16 centuries that the Bible was being written. When the Bible refers to a ruler, it always uses the proper title. For example, it correctly refers to Herod Antipas as district ruler and Gallio as proconsul. (Luke 3:1; Acts 18:12) Ezra 5:6 refers to Tattenai, the governor of the Persian province beyond the River, the Euphrates River.
However, recent excavations indicate that Edom was a complex society centuries earlier [than previously thought], as reflected in the Bible, states an article in the journal Biblical Archaeology Review.
Events. Until recently, many scholars doubted the accuracy of the Bibles account of the nation of Edom battling with Israel in the time of David. (2 Samuel 8:13, 14) Edom, they argued, was a simple pastoral society at the time and did not become sufficiently organized or have the might to threaten Israel until much later.
Before 1993, there was no proof outside the Bible to support the historicity of David, the brave young shepherd who later became king of Israel. That year, however, archaeologists uncovered in northern Israel a basalt stone, dated to the ninth century B.C.E., that experts say bears the words House of David and king of Israel.
People. Bible critics questioned the existence of Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea who handed Jesus over to be impaled. (Matthew 27:1-26) Evidence that Pilate was once ruler of Judea is etched on a stone discovered at the Mediterranean seaport city of Caesarea in 1961.
As someone who has an above understanding of God and religion, I have to say that most of you commenting don't seem to have even a fundamental grasp of any theology. You attack a version of religion that's suitable for a child, and turn your brain off when someone tries to explain a particular religion as it is really held by and instructed adult. All the while complaining, no doubt, about the straw man arguments made by creationists.
Up until the 60s the majority of scientist believe there was no beginning. Accepting the big bang theory was consistent with the Bible in that the beginning had a beginning, and will have an end. Furthermore, the other rolled up dimensions of string theory further supports that there is more to reality than we can perceive.
I called him a "Man" instead of "creator" or "God", because the vast majority of believers describe their "God" as a man with feelings, thoughts, plans/motivations, a temper and so on. Here, the believers are doing a good job with ridiculing religion and chasing non-ignorant people away? from themselves. Because the logic of having a man thinking about building a universe almost 13.7 billion years before thoughts/consciousness/foresight had evolved in any being's brain(Our near ancestors')
The stories from the old testament are glorified. They have been changed through time. I don't believe they can be taken seriously. They defy the laws of physics and are simply impossible. And notice as time goes on they become less common. However, Jesus was real. The miracles he "performed" are ridiculous but he himself and his principles are true. Also Christianity is the only religion that doen't state that you must follow it. I think God is real but not the way the books tell us.
I will believe in God if anyone can take a video and post it here in youtube. If nobody could produce the existence of God besides from a historical book, it is so hard to know the existence of God at all.
JEHOVAH GOD deeply cares for us and wants us to benefit from his loving direction. If we worship him in the right way, we will be happy and will avoid many problems in life. We will also have his blessing and his help. (Isaiah 48:17) There are, however, hundreds of religions including believing in thrush that claim to teach the truth about God. Yet, they differ greatly in their teachings about who God is and what he expects of us
Long ago, there was a man who was in just such a position. His name was Moses. He was 80 years old. He had spent four decades exiled from his people, the Israelites, who were slaves in Egypt.
One day, while tending his father-in-lows flocks, he saw a strange phenomenon. A thornbush was on fire, but it was not being consumed. It just kept burning, shining like a beacon on the mountainside. Moses approached to inspect. How startled he must have been when a voice spoke to him from the midst of the fire. By means of an angelic spokesman, god and Moses then converse at length.
And, as you may know, God there commissioned a hesitant Moses to leave his peaceful life and return to Egypt to deliver the Israelites form slavery. Now, Moses could have asked God any question what soever. Note, though, the question he chose to ask: suppose I am now come to the sons of Israel and I do say to them, the god of your forefathers as sent me to you, and they do say to me, what is his name? What shall I say to them. Read Exodus 3:13, 14 God told Moses his name.
One day, while tending his father-in-lows flocks, he saw a strange phenomenon. A thornbush was on fire, but it was not being consumed. It just kept burning, shining like a beacon on the mountainside. Moses approached to inspect. How startled he must have been when a voice spoke to him from the midst of the fire. By means of an angelic spokesman, god and Moses then converse at length.
God was showing Moses His absolute, perpetual, self-inherent Eternal, never-ending state of Being. But God did not stop with this remarkable statement. He went on to say, "...Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, 'the LORD [Hebrew: YHVH, often pronounced "Jehovah"] God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you': this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.
Wow!!you gave relevant information... How come the archaeologists did not find any evidences regarding Moses and the Jews existence in Eygpt as slaves?
Our Awesome Universe, Earth Uniquely Designed (The earth was made with loving care so that we could enjoy life fully), The Amazing Living Cell, Our Incredible Brain, The Unique Blood System. Other Marvels human body like eye. "I shall laud you [God] because in a fear-inspiring way I am wonderfully made. Your works are wonderful."—Psalm 139:14.
I think this point is the biggest negating factor in the notion of a God. Religion is simply the explanation for a universe based on a linear description of time. When you realise time isn't and the dimensions live in aren't all of them, you start to realise that religion doesn't work precisely because only if time isn't linear can anything have 'no' creator
Jehovah has told us where the universe came from, how the earth got here, and who will live on it. He has told us that earth's human inhabitants must cultivate it and lovingly care for the plants and animals that share it with them. He has also told us what happens when people die, that they can come back to life, and what they must do to live upon the earth forever.
What if we concentrate first what we understand and than we star to look back in time step to step? It's isn't to early with our knowledge level to look that back like the big bang?
Great video! I really liked the zoom in on the nebula.
For me, the amazing thing about seeing galaxies that are 500 million light years away is that we are seeing history. We're seeing the galaxies as they existed 500 million years ago.
I'm no linguistic, but 3:20 says "our star is in a galaxy, one of 500.000 million in the milky way." Of course with "one" he means our star, but grammatically isn't it referring to "galaxy"??? Also the assumption that space is as big as we can see, and therefor is as old as the oldest light is that is reaching us divided by 2, as we are moving away from each other. What an idiotic assumption, it's like sitting on an island and concluding earth is 100 km2 and well, like 0.001 seconds old.
You're right, the grammar is poor. I was referring to our star, not the galaxy. You're not the first to call me on that, it is confusing. My apologies.
I never made the assumption your talking about. Never once did I say what you're stating above.
The number for the size of the universe can't be discerned from the HUDF image. The number I used (which has been revised to 47 ly radius), was determined using CMB maps.
It's just that I find the big bang theory an uncomplete and unanswering theory. It's made up mainly to serve the question: who/what made the universe. For some it is god, others it's the big bang. It's just creating a new question: who/what made god/big bang? This is why I find the big bang theory an religion typed aproach to science. Since the big bang hasn't been scientificly proved, how can you describe assumptions (e.g. Age of universe) on top of that theory as scientific? btw, nice movie:)
i hate the big bang theory as well.I'm pro science,but they're trying to hard to answer questions that are beyond our understanding at this point.We need to take it one step at a time.
I think they (astronomers) are basing their estimates on the Big Bang theory. And time is a function of distance divided by velocity...or something like that.
True, and every time they find get a better image, they spot further galaxies and readjust (enlarge) the estimation of the size and age of the universe. This is thus stupid in 2 ways, first relying on an unproven theory called Big Bang, and secondly made up out of data that doesn't say how big the universe is, but just how far they can see... Total Retarded thus... It's just that science tries to answer that basic question that they need this stupid theory... which actually doesn't answer it...
what would be really cool is if they could point the hubble anywhere dark and see the same cluster of galaxies; only each view would be from a different angle or perspective. Maybe it's our own cluster we're seeing. That blows my mind, I may have to start using drugs again.
I find the Steady State theory quite similar to the big bang theory... The only Big difference is that the big bang says it was all created in "1 Bang", while the steady state says that creation of matter and/or energy is continuous. While steady state does not express itself over a starting point. If it's a law in physics leading to the Big Bang, why did it only occur once... Although I don't find any of these theories credible, in previous perspective I find Steady State less incredible.
The answers have always been there, but like the religionists of Jesus' day, many people have blinded their eyes, shut their ears, and hardened their hearts to answers that did not match their human theories or their chosen life-style. (Matthew 13:14, 15)
You mean like all religionists today, who all believe in their own version of god, a thing/body/theory that is based on not a single piece of proof? Heck, praying to my trash more sense to me, cause at least I know it's there for real...(and who knows it might have more powers than your imaginative god)
If only all of humanity paid more attention to the much grander scheme of things in the universe, who could say what we would learn. The discoveries and insights gained from this can only be called humbling, as the true word to describe them has yet to be coined by humanity in any language.
Let us put it all in prospective. This picture is of a area of our sky when your looking up at night the size of a grain of sand held away from your eye at arms length. And it contains thousands of galaxies and trillion upon trillions of stars. Each star has the possiblility of life. There is a good chance when your looking at that picture your looking at millions of worlds with species far more advanced than we. Did one of the hundreds of gods that humans have thought up create all this. No
yes it seems much more likely to win the lottery if you play every day right? like if you play for a million years you much surely win, right ? hmmm....
Perfect, A video that will humble anyone who watches it that has even a small understanding of what he is demonstrating. The best demonstration since Carl Sagen. Thanks
Anything is possible, the rules change when your point of view changes. Then there is dimensional shifts. Who is to say the so called speed of light is constant in different realms, in holes, in quasars?
I didn't think bulldoodoo, but I did do a double take. No big bang? I thought it had been pretty much proved.
But it took a long time for Copernicus to be proved right. It took technology and direct observation to establish some new truths about the nature of the universe. Even then, when Galileo could prove the new paradigm, few ventured to even look into his telescope.
So I checked out that holoscience website. Some hours later, I found myself still skeptical but intrigued. What if?
Tony, I've watched this video about 50 times. That's not a joke.
Whenever I feel down, whenever I need to feel like life is just a glimpse and I'm lucky to be alive, I play this video.
Superb Tony. 78 Billion thumbs up!
From Jamaica, via Toronto Canada
Kelz
KelzLife 1 week ago
Through the Doppler effect, we can answer why we see 13.8 and 78 billion light years away. Nothing travels faster than light. If you imagine 100 galaxies in a straight line, and each one is away from the other 1% the speed of light, the first galaxy away from the last at the speed of light. In the universe, we have billions of galaxies in a straight line, so the last galaxy away faster than time passes. So we have more measures in the universe than the existence.
reatoruv 5 months ago
Great video! Really puts things into perspective! Glad you kept the Numa Numa guy in too lol
gelrichgee 5 months ago
The more we try to understand the Universe the more difficult to understand it becomes.
Yallniggasbetrollin 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dang ... didn't know space was this inspiring =/ thumbs up if you liked this :)
RoxXxAbsoluteTuning 8 months ago
Whos the fat moron @ 1:31 spoiling an otherwise fantastic posting?
You really are a fat stupid pig bodied moron!
One more brain cell you could be a potato!
niznet111 9 months ago 3
@niznet111 hes numa numa guy why are you hating... he is amusing himself a thing many people somehow forgot along the way of growing up
RTRVII 4 months ago
@RTRVII numa numa guy? You vegatable! He is spoiling a serious subject that does not involve this obese drama queen. He obviously has the brain of a 1 year old child. An exhibitionist with no friends and no life except for this show of stupidity. He is a Troglodite (Look it up!)
niznet111 4 months ago
@niznet111 He did not choose to be in this video, the composer did. he didn't choose to be made to the "numa numa guy" he just posted a video of him dancing to music (what the fuck is wrong with that).
Why are you hating on less intelligent people? Blame the composer of this video instead.
RTRVII 4 months ago
1st song - Pink Floyd - Shine On You Crazy Diamond
2nd song - Celtic Panpipes - Ride On
Thumb this up so everyone can see this :)
vallefradk 10 months ago 2
tdarnell, it'd be excellent if you could locate the chanting/flute song; it's hauntingly beautiful!
Aphradonis 1 year ago
Can anyone tell me the song at the start. I recognise it but cant remember the name
95SuperGlue 1 year ago
Galaxies move faster than the speed of light
ferrarimike23 1 year ago
astronomy is the true religion, with biology as a kind of talmud ;)
LLit11 1 year ago
Seems bollocks how can it b 78 billion light years away if they see it!!! Within 12 days. I'm not a scientist but if u travel for 12 days at speed of light woodnt u b at them planets in the ultra deep space shit????? Sorry for being blunt but it sounds shit.
leemassey1 1 year ago
@leemassey1 All we can see out to is 13.6 light years distance since the universe is 13.6 billion years old. You are quite right. I dunno how thy come up with 78 billion light years for the width of the universe though...
zideffil 9 months ago
What is the song with the flute? Anyone know? The flute gives me chills.
smokinpuddlez702 1 year ago
anybody know the song at starting around 1:55? Great video!
MrGoober3000 1 year ago
@MrGoober3000
its Celtic panpipes - ride on
malcha16 11 months ago
fantastic video. I love science
RTRVII 1 year ago 3
i love getting out of class(which is where we never learn about cool stuff like this) and coming to my apartment and just chillaxing while smoking a fat bowl to this video.
ismokeot420420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Resurrection of Jesus is the new creation. Be catholic.
akwinata1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry but the most important image ever taken is that of the earth as seen from Apollo 17. Our big blue planet does harbor life. Life so intellegent and advanced that we dare to seek and learn from that which is greater than ourselves. We are the only know species to have ever existed in 5 billion years on this planet to have reached out into the stars.
We ain't perfect, but were damn good! milan.usconsulate.gov/images/The_Earth_seen_from_Apollo_17.jpg
figurethisout3 1 year ago
fuck you you fat kunt
djrakman 1 year ago
78,000,000,000 Lt. Yrs. Across. That would imply the edge, or the boundaries of the Universe had been found. Surely this can't be so! The Universe goes on into infinity, does it not?.....Fantastic video, bye the way!
planetyouranus22 1 year ago
Some things will never be solved. The answer will not be discovered. Ever.
Dullence92 1 year ago
Very beautiful!!!! Thanks for the video!
XInFerMoX 1 year ago
ROFL thats a romanian song lol
darkdyaz2 1 year ago
What seems to be missing is the fact that every"thing" in the universe is not expanding; it's the separation between every"thing" that's expanding or increasing. It's not like gas particles or parts of a bomb suddenly exploding in a room, with bits and pieces blowing outward, diffusing and filling up the space. There is no room; there is no space to "fill up" or to expand into. It's the space between the bits and pieces that's increasing, expanding, separating all the bits and pieces.
runupahill1 1 year ago
I feel sorry for close minding people who think we are alone.. really
yinzx7 1 year ago
Hey mikespindor & zidiffil, I believe you guys have said something real here. How can we see a star that has emitted its light several billion years more than our earth has existed and we can see it? Are the scientists wrong? Mere logic tells us that this can not be right. Someone is lying!!!!!!
Frosty6677 1 year ago
@Frosty6677 if you go and look at the stars in the sky some of them dont even excist anymore they gone supernova it takes millions of years for there light to reach us so we can only it as the light hits us like the suns light takes 8 min to reach us
MsShane42 1 year ago
@Frosty6677 Why would you assume someone is lying when you don't fully understand. Do some research before coming to a conclusion. The Hubble ultra deep field image is 13 billion light years away (light that has recently appeared). Today, the galaxies have moved away from their original postion and their new lgiht hasn't reached us yet. And it won't reach us for a very, very long time. Same thing with the Sun. You see the Sun as it was 8min ago.
TheLegendarySkeptic 1 year ago
@Frosty6677 That's the same logic that says an outfielder can not have caught a fly ball because he wasn't under it when it was hit. Or how about my friend can not meet me at the airport because he was not there 5 hours ago when my plane took off. You were kidding right?
awakeningnow 1 year ago
zideflil,
I agree with you. I cant understand why the Universe is 47 billion light years in radius, when the age is 13.7 Billion years approx. How can that be? How can scientists tell the distance in light years when the age in years is far less?
mikespindor 1 year ago
@mikespindor
Probably the reason why the universe is 47 billon light years in radius is also due to the expansion of the universe. When you look at the hubble ultra deep field, scientists said that we are looking at 13 billion light years away. But thats only the light that appeared to us just recently; as of today, those galaxies have moved away from their original position. The light from their 'new positions' just haven't reached us yet, and won't for another few billions of years or so.
XCMagician94 1 year ago
@XCMagician94 thank you for the post. makes more sense now. amazing!!!
mikespindor 1 year ago
@mikespindor The speed of light is constant @ 186,000 miles per second, multiply that by the number of seconds in a year = 1 Lt. Yr. That is the DISTANCE that light travels in one year. ( sorry, there are not enough digits on my calculator) So when we look at the Hubble Ultra Deep Field today. We are seeing it as it was 13.7 Bn. Yrs. ago. So, today, in real terms. It's that distance, plus whatever distance it has traveled in those13.7 Bn. Yrs......if it still exists!
planetyouranus22 1 year ago
first we have to get out of this planet(if we wanna get to the truth) the Baddest VIRUS this Planet has...its called i.lluminati (over 300 familys,rockefellers,rothchild etc etc)..only if we get them out of nearly most of the goverments,politics etc etc in our world, Humantiy has a real chance of PEACE on EARTH to look forward to the Galaxy etc..but they still hungry for more money and Might..the are working on a NEW WORLD ORDER! were they controll everything on earth.Dont let this happen
buonvolere 1 year ago
Good video, but why is the Hubble Deep Field a more important image than, say, the pale blue dot?
lzdsl0 1 year ago
@lzdsl0 thanks to hubble deep field we can see alot of pale blue dots? that could hold life like the one we are all on i would call that more inportant
MsShane42 1 year ago
they should do an exposure far longer then 11 days. They should see if longer exposures will expose as yet unseen objects.
Ixions42 2 years ago 10
@Ixions42
thats what i was wondering ... an exposure for like 100 days would be awesome
sammygee17 1 year ago
@Ixions42 Its not all about the exposure time, above and beyond that the magnification needs to be increased. If it wasn't increased all you would get is the galaxies brighter? To increase the magnification you need extra lenses, and for each lens added the more photons are reflected and refracted away from the sensor. So we are getting close to the edge of our engineering ability. Or the sensor sise needs to be increased? again reaching edge of engineering ability unfortunately. Soon tho! :)
Nicky282820 9 months ago
I'm afraid that I'm a bit lost. If our universe is only 13.something billion years old, why can we see galaxies that are 78 billion light years away from us? It would seem to me that the light wouldn't have have had enough time to reach us. What am I missing here? It would seem to me that we shouldn't be able to see anything beyond 13.something light years away!?!
zideffil 2 years ago 3
@zideffil
photons from those galaxies left billions of years ago and the ones that reach earth are what you see in the telescope, at this time some of them may already be gone. the light you see from the sun left 8 minutes ago
---
also, not because you don't know something then you can't assume that everyone else doesn't either. if there WAS a God, and he showed himself to someone then they would really know. that may sound nuts, but it could also be true.
taleofsixstrings 2 years ago
taleofsixstrings, you don't answer my question at all and don't seem to understand the question. To re-ask:- If the universe is obnly 13.something years old, how is it that we can see light from galaxies beyond 13.something light years distant? The light from them would not have had enough time to reach us yet. As for God, it's just that the whole thing is fucked up. The Bible tales are so far-fetched and none of it is supported by history. It is just nonsense, as in, NO SENSE.
zideffil 2 years ago
I just posted a video that tries to answer your question. This is probably the most asked question on my channel. I hope you find the new video helpful.
tdarnell 1 year ago 6
@tdarnell
which video was this?? I wondered that question, my guess would be the telescopes can see towards the light where as our eyes only see where the earth is.
cruiseylee 3 months ago
@tdarnell I have another problem with the distance of the radius of 38 billion light years. That would mean that the light from an object reached us (Earth) after traveling 38 billion years. Shouldn't we try to consider how long it would have taken that object to get to that point in the first place? Also, since we are traveling through time at the same rate as the distant object, it has been traveling away from us for 38 billion years. It would seem that the universe is much bigger and older.
matthewtaylorbrown 3 months ago
@zideffil It is due to the accelerating expansion of the universe. The universe is 13+ billion years old, but due to the acceleration of galaxies away from each other the distance between them has increased faster than the speed of light. It is not that objects are moving through space faster than the speed of light, it is that the fabric of space is expanding faster than the speed of light. Space is like an ocean, and the galaxies are like boats being pulled away by the rip currents.
WhiteLotus317 1 year ago
@zideffil u got the oppsite mate
19raghu 1 year ago
@19raghu Uh,...what is an oppsite? Did you mean 'opposite', perchance? If you did, then I have the opposite of what? In other words, what are you talking about?
zideffil 1 year ago
@zideffil easy. Space time is expanding faster than the speed of light, how could u not know that, simple space physics.
ismokeot420420 1 year ago
@ismokeot420420 Your supreme eggheadness, I SO humbly beg your pardon. I KNOW I don't deserve to be making comments on the same page with you. I SO regret not having taken space physics but having studied engineering instead. I can only imagine how insulted you may feel. I will refrain from asking such stupid questions in the future, of course. Could I possibly suggest Pepto-Bismol or a small explosive charge placed anally to help get you back on par?
zideffil 1 year ago
@zideffil u really think im gonna read all that...douchebag. EASY
ismokeot420420 1 year ago
@ismokeot420420 I understand. Go smoke another 'bowl' and do the 'UH?" thing. So glad to not be you.
zideffil 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zideffil easy. Space time is expanding faster than the speed of light, how could u not know that, simple space physics.
ismokeot420420 1 year ago
@zideffil
galaxies are moving faster than the speed of light.
emptyboxesandrooms 9 months ago
@emptyboxesandrooms Thanks for your reply and I learned that shortly after having posted the comment. We still can't SEE beyond 13.6 light years away from us, it said on a science show I saw on TV the other night.
zideffil 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@emptyboxesandrooms "galaxies are moving faster than the speed of light."
Or, rather, the empty space between the galaxies is expanding faster than the speed of light.
When a physicist tells you that nothing can travel faster than light, it means that only 'nothing' is able to move faster than the speed of light.
i.e. the speed of dark is faster than the speed of light.
mdiem 9 months ago
@zideffil its because the universe is rapidly expanding faster then the speed of light so as the light is rushing twords us the space between us and the star/ galaxy is increasing
MastaNobody 7 months ago
Wow. Wow....wow. I thought I knew. I had no idea. Wow.
Horusisme 2 years ago 2
More perspectives.
-Tiniest star (red dwarf) = 0,03 AU (Astronomical unit) = 5-6million miles in radius.
-Biggest star (known so far) Name:Canis Majoris.
Canis majoris= 9,00 AU. Which is 9 x 150million = 1,350.000.000Miles in radios.
This is only the biggest star captured on tape. Not much farther then the frontier of our local galaxys cosmic gas arm. Which is only a small part of the milkyway. There are probably much bigger stars in the other parth of our galaxy and the other 100billions
Armigo91 2 years ago
Perhaps all the galaxies are molecules, and we exist only on a sub-microscopic level to another universe. Nah.
didytom 2 years ago 2
@didytom ive thinked of that to xD
FooootballFreak 2 years ago
great video! thanx
clearvoyage 2 years ago
lol it would be fucked up that we are the only once, but i hope we not
pycckuu911 2 years ago
are there more than a million billion billion million stars?
bronco2121 2 years ago
@bronco2121 INDEED! I think you can multiply your number with it selft 10times and still not high enough. and thats big! And the fact that A lot of the stars has several planets around them just blows my mind. I mean, there has to be thousands of other planets with lives. Even hundres of thousands planets with life : S it's wicked!
popkornost 2 years ago
@popkornost
No, if there are billions of galaxies, there is at least one that has life. So, yeah. I'm pretty sure there's more than one in our own galaxy. So, um. I think my mind was just blown.
Germanboy567 2 years ago
so you wouldn't be able to actually exist in the past only look at from a distance. so to quote warrior... You're talking time travel :p
xp0nd3r 2 years ago
@coleyfan well not really. unless you get into other dimension. say time (as a physical dimension) is set up like sheet of paper and we are drawn on each page. now flip through the book, if you flip through the book in 1 sec say it equals a lifetime. if you think about time as a dimension set up like this its possible that we exist in other dimensions, but not other galaxies or earths. in order to flip back you would have to travel farther from the earth faster than the speed of light. cont.
xp0nd3r 2 years ago
its crazy how small we are in the universe
viciousvintagev 2 years ago
whos the fat man? lol
jakee03 2 years ago
guess what, we'll never contact any other forms of life on any other earths, it just wont happen - this place called the universe is the definition of beauty though.....
Ucfspencer 2 years ago
SHINE ON :)
Rozq87 2 years ago
do we exist on other earths in other galaxies in at different stages of our lives and maybe we never actually die only run out of time in one
coleyflan 2 years ago
Another possibility.. since our universe has expanded since the big bang 78B light years ago, and the size of the universe was much smaller, are we really looking at the past at one of the galaxies as the Milkyway? and in it our Sun in its very early stage of formation? Is this actually possible to see us in the past?
mrsuavecool 2 years ago
hmm, it's probably not possible to see us in the past since the light of our sun (and other stars) are shining outward and don't logically have a way to return to us. Interesting though.
warriorsng 2 years ago
ok, so let me get this straight, we know the condition a fraction of a second after the big bang, but not at or before.. so when we look this far back, we are seeing a much smaller and compressed universe in which we are supposedly be in it. no?
mrsuavecool 2 years ago
It's all about light and the speed of light. We can see other galaxies as they were in the past because their light is (or was) shining toward us. We cannot see ourselves because the light of us is shining outward.
To see ourselves in the past, we'd have to travel faster than the speed of light, and arrive at a point far away, thus being able to see the light of how we were. You're talking time travel :p
warriorsng 2 years ago
Thank you for your explanation.
mrsuavecool 2 years ago
Could it be possible that what we're looking at in the deep field no longer exist? The galaxies are no longer there since we're really looking at 78 billions light years ago in the past ?
mrsuavecool 2 years ago
Yes, that's definitely possible.
warriorsng 2 years ago
What's with the cheaters music?
tjtheplay 2 years ago
what is the name of that image at the very beggining of video ?
kiesha86 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That`s what I say: "HOW GREAT THOU ART, MY LORD! "
eloyroliveira 2 years ago
no such thing as a sin sex not a sin if i wasnt for sex we wouldnt be here in the end u are just a animal and animals kill each other all the time not a sin lying is what u do when u have no one who really knows u in the end we are all the same not a sin etcetcetc paslm get this (quote)when i die if u miss me just feel the wind or over turn a rock and i will be there from the 1st athiest and a man way ahead of his time and the most misunderstood person ever jesus knew he was not going anywere...
IMINTHEMOMENTRU 2 years ago
anyone that is religious that watches this and still dont get it mmm let me help u out go get on a (plane) because u r just part of a differant koko club i wish i could live till everyone ends up athiest hubbble is the thing we made 2 try 2 end this game of hide n seek with god ... lmao
IMINTHEMOMENTRU 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You need to confess the sin in your heart
Psalm23YHVH 2 years ago
Surely this video strengthens the possibility of some form of God or supremer creator?
S3AANNN 2 years ago
S3AANNN, I don't know why you would think that the video strengthens the possibility of a god. No one on earth knows why the universe exists or if it was created by something or it just happened for no reason and when I encounter someone who says they do know, then I am SURE that I'm listening to a fool, a religious nut, or both.
zideffil 2 years ago
I'm actually atheist, and i never said i know that there is a God or supreme being i was just saying that surely this would support that idea rather than disregard it. I didn't say this made me believe in any religion. I'd be happy to state my views on existance but not in a youtube comment.
S3AANNN 2 years ago
im religous and i understand this perfectly clear and i believe it perfectly. and im probily more educated then u
JASONCROW123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA announced they found Planet X in 1983 then said it was a mistake.
They LIED!
This is what theyre hiding with the chemtrails sprayed every day globally. Its the reason for the increase in quakes and volcanoes and for the doomsday seed vault.
It is also the warning for the war of Armageddon which will see America destroyed by Russia, China and the SCO on the day of the next us/israeli false flag to invade Iran.
News here:
(3w) . scribd . com/doc/16612974/War-News
AntiLieGuy 2 years ago
And now physicists believe that there is another universes. That means we are even smaller.
MegaVersum 2 years ago
we are nothing in this universe/universes
we are living in our own little world without knowing who is out there wating for us....
MrDannyel17 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unique circumstances. The Bible was written over a span of some 1,600 years, from 1513 B.C.E. to about 98 C.E. Many of the approximately 40 writers thus lived centuries apart. Their occupations were varied. Some were fishermen, others were shepherds or kings, and one was a physician.
nadonai 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you need to get a life.
GuppyPal 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imagine asking 40 men from varied backgrounds to write a book, each writing a section. The writers live in a number of lands and do not all know one another. Some do not know what the others have written. Would you expect a book thus produced to be harmonious?
nadonai 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Gospel writers did not color the facts in order to cast Jesus in a more favorable light. Rather, they reported honestly that he was born under humble circumstances into a working-class family, that he did not study at the prestigious schools of his day, and that the majority of his listeners rejected his message.—Matthew 27:25; Luke 2:4-7; John 7:15.
nadonai 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
(Psalm 73:1-14) Jonah told of his disobedience and the bad attitude he initially had when God showed mercy to repentant sinners. (Jonah 1:1-3; 3:10; 4:1-3) Matthew freely related that he had abandoned Jesus on the night of Jesus arrest.—Matthew 26:56.
nadonai 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mistakes and shortcomings. The Bible writers openly admitted their own failures and weaknesses. Moses told of a mistake he made that cost him dearly. (Numbers 20:7-13) Asaph explained that for a time he found himself envying the prosperous life of the wicked.
nadonai 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A coin produced in the fourth century B.C.E. contains a similar description, identifying the Persian governor Mazaeus as ruler of the province Beyond the River.Accuracy in seemingly minor details is no small matter. If we can trust the Bible writers in even small details, should that not bolster our confidence in the other things they wrote?
nadonai 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Proper titles. There were many rulers on the world stage during the 16 centuries that the Bible was being written. When the Bible refers to a ruler, it always uses the proper title. For example, it correctly refers to Herod Antipas as district ruler and Gallio as proconsul. (Luke 3:1; Acts 18:12) Ezra 5:6 refers to Tattenai, the governor of the Persian province beyond the River, the Euphrates River.
nadonai 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
However, recent excavations indicate that Edom was a complex society centuries earlier [than previously thought], as reflected in the Bible, states an article in the journal Biblical Archaeology Review.
nadonai 2 years ago
Events. Until recently, many scholars doubted the accuracy of the Bibles account of the nation of Edom battling with Israel in the time of David. (2 Samuel 8:13, 14) Edom, they argued, was a simple pastoral society at the time and did not become sufficiently organized or have the might to threaten Israel until much later.
nadonai 2 years ago
Before 1993, there was no proof outside the Bible to support the historicity of David, the brave young shepherd who later became king of Israel. That year, however, archaeologists uncovered in northern Israel a basalt stone, dated to the ninth century B.C.E., that experts say bears the words House of David and king of Israel.
nadonai 2 years ago
People. Bible critics questioned the existence of Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea who handed Jesus over to be impaled. (Matthew 27:1-26) Evidence that Pilate was once ruler of Judea is etched on a stone discovered at the Mediterranean seaport city of Caesarea in 1961.
nadonai 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NO ONE has ever successfully challenged the historical accuracy of the Bible. It refers to real people and real events
nadonai 2 years ago
As someone who has an above understanding of God and religion, I have to say that most of you commenting don't seem to have even a fundamental grasp of any theology. You attack a version of religion that's suitable for a child, and turn your brain off when someone tries to explain a particular religion as it is really held by and instructed adult. All the while complaining, no doubt, about the straw man arguments made by creationists.
mondo223 2 years ago
Up until the 60s the majority of scientist believe there was no beginning. Accepting the big bang theory was consistent with the Bible in that the beginning had a beginning, and will have an end. Furthermore, the other rolled up dimensions of string theory further supports that there is more to reality than we can perceive.
mondo223 2 years ago
Science leads to practical advantage for our species, while religion is? simply rampant speculation based on emotional appeal and whim.
rikci1 2 years ago 8
@rikci1
well because of religion, science began.
people like newton and Kepler used science and mathematics as a way to get closer to god.
so because of simply rampant speculation, it led to a wonderful scientific revolution.
Forman6 10 months ago
I called him a "Man" instead of "creator" or "God", because the vast majority of believers describe their "God" as a man with feelings, thoughts, plans/motivations, a temper and so on. Here, the believers are doing a good job with ridiculing religion and chasing non-ignorant people away? from themselves. Because the logic of having a man thinking about building a universe almost 13.7 billion years before thoughts/consciousness/foresight had evolved in any being's brain(Our near ancestors')
rikci1 2 years ago
The stories from the old testament are glorified. They have been changed through time. I don't believe they can be taken seriously. They defy the laws of physics and are simply impossible. And notice as time goes on they become less common. However, Jesus was real. The miracles he "performed" are ridiculous but he himself and his principles are true. Also Christianity is the only religion that doen't state that you must follow it. I think God is real but not the way the books tell us.
95SuperGlue 2 years ago
I will believe in God if anyone can take a video and post it here in youtube. If nobody could produce the existence of God besides from a historical book, it is so hard to know the existence of God at all.
rampantlion103 2 years ago
best vid on u tube!
krazedinmiami 2 years ago
Comment removed
skajellafetty 2 years ago
JEHOVAH GOD deeply cares for us and wants us to benefit from his loving direction. If we worship him in the right way, we will be happy and will avoid many problems in life. We will also have his blessing and his help. (Isaiah 48:17) There are, however, hundreds of religions including believing in thrush that claim to teach the truth about God. Yet, they differ greatly in their teachings about who God is and what he expects of us
nadonai 2 years ago
Wher is this Jehovah, you are talking about?????????????Is it a fantasy????
Daxjen1312 2 years ago
Good question!!!!
Long ago, there was a man who was in just such a position. His name was Moses. He was 80 years old. He had spent four decades exiled from his people, the Israelites, who were slaves in Egypt.
nadonai 2 years ago
One day, while tending his father-in-lows flocks, he saw a strange phenomenon. A thornbush was on fire, but it was not being consumed. It just kept burning, shining like a beacon on the mountainside. Moses approached to inspect. How startled he must have been when a voice spoke to him from the midst of the fire. By means of an angelic spokesman, god and Moses then converse at length.
nadonai 2 years ago
And, as you may know, God there commissioned a hesitant Moses to leave his peaceful life and return to Egypt to deliver the Israelites form slavery. Now, Moses could have asked God any question what soever. Note, though, the question he chose to ask: suppose I am now come to the sons of Israel and I do say to them, the god of your forefathers as sent me to you, and they do say to me, what is his name? What shall I say to them. Read Exodus 3:13, 14 God told Moses his name.
nadonai 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One day, while tending his father-in-lows flocks, he saw a strange phenomenon. A thornbush was on fire, but it was not being consumed. It just kept burning, shining like a beacon on the mountainside. Moses approached to inspect. How startled he must have been when a voice spoke to him from the midst of the fire. By means of an angelic spokesman, god and Moses then converse at length.
nadonai 2 years ago
God was showing Moses His absolute, perpetual, self-inherent Eternal, never-ending state of Being. But God did not stop with this remarkable statement. He went on to say, "...Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, 'the LORD [Hebrew: YHVH, often pronounced "Jehovah"] God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you': this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.
nadonai 2 years ago
Wow!!you gave relevant information... How come the archaeologists did not find any evidences regarding Moses and the Jews existence in Eygpt as slaves?
Akaneia896 2 years ago
Our Awesome Universe, Earth Uniquely Designed (The earth was made with loving care so that we could enjoy life fully), The Amazing Living Cell, Our Incredible Brain, The Unique Blood System. Other Marvels human body like eye. "I shall laud you [God] because in a fear-inspiring way I am wonderfully made. Your works are wonderful."—Psalm 139:14.
nadonai 2 years ago
Comment removed
nadonai 2 years ago
who made God?
thendi23 2 years ago
I think this point is the biggest negating factor in the notion of a God. Religion is simply the explanation for a universe based on a linear description of time. When you realise time isn't and the dimensions live in aren't all of them, you start to realise that religion doesn't work precisely because only if time isn't linear can anything have 'no' creator
KCwalksabout 2 years ago
Jehovah has told us where the universe came from, how the earth got here, and who will live on it. He has told us that earth's human inhabitants must cultivate it and lovingly care for the plants and animals that share it with them. He has also told us what happens when people die, that they can come back to life, and what they must do to live upon the earth forever.
nadonai 2 years ago
Is that fat kid in there supposed to be or this some user made junk?
Sunburn2007 2 years ago
whats this song?
33SaintBernards 2 years ago
sorry for being off topic, but pink floyd + images of the universe is fucking amazing
EMGjacksonDKMG 2 years ago
WOOOW!!! where r we?
chromeZe 2 years ago
Comment removed
chromeZe 2 years ago
Can I ask something?
What if we concentrate first what we understand and than we star to look back in time step to step? It's isn't to early with our knowledge level to look that back like the big bang?
LBStudios 2 years ago
I have amateur interest in astronomy and I love your videos.
Your voice quality is very clear. Can you share which microphone you use?
thanks,
Shobhit
shobhitg 2 years ago
Loving the pan flute version of "ride on".
Jazzpanda0304 2 years ago
what song is at the beggining? its the same one from the zeitgeist movement vid please tell me
reptarkingofozone5 2 years ago
"Shine On You Crazy Diamond" by Pink Floyd
wfly81 2 years ago
the two 'deep field' images are easily the most important images ever captured by man......simply beautiful.
levelate 2 years ago 2
Great video! I really liked the zoom in on the nebula.
For me, the amazing thing about seeing galaxies that are 500 million light years away is that we are seeing history. We're seeing the galaxies as they existed 500 million years ago.
rickcheyne 2 years ago
Comment removed
edyinthesky 2 years ago
I'm no linguistic, but 3:20 says "our star is in a galaxy, one of 500.000 million in the milky way." Of course with "one" he means our star, but grammatically isn't it referring to "galaxy"??? Also the assumption that space is as big as we can see, and therefor is as old as the oldest light is that is reaching us divided by 2, as we are moving away from each other. What an idiotic assumption, it's like sitting on an island and concluding earth is 100 km2 and well, like 0.001 seconds old.
edyinthesky 2 years ago
You're right, the grammar is poor. I was referring to our star, not the galaxy. You're not the first to call me on that, it is confusing. My apologies.
I never made the assumption your talking about. Never once did I say what you're stating above.
The number for the size of the universe can't be discerned from the HUDF image. The number I used (which has been revised to 47 ly radius), was determined using CMB maps.
tdarnell 2 years ago
It's just that I find the big bang theory an uncomplete and unanswering theory. It's made up mainly to serve the question: who/what made the universe. For some it is god, others it's the big bang. It's just creating a new question: who/what made god/big bang? This is why I find the big bang theory an religion typed aproach to science. Since the big bang hasn't been scientificly proved, how can you describe assumptions (e.g. Age of universe) on top of that theory as scientific? btw, nice movie:)
edyinthesky 2 years ago
i hate the big bang theory as well.I'm pro science,but they're trying to hard to answer questions that are beyond our understanding at this point.We need to take it one step at a time.
noblepuker 2 years ago
I think they (astronomers) are basing their estimates on the Big Bang theory. And time is a function of distance divided by velocity...or something like that.
jimn35 2 years ago
True, and every time they find get a better image, they spot further galaxies and readjust (enlarge) the estimation of the size and age of the universe. This is thus stupid in 2 ways, first relying on an unproven theory called Big Bang, and secondly made up out of data that doesn't say how big the universe is, but just how far they can see... Total Retarded thus... It's just that science tries to answer that basic question that they need this stupid theory... which actually doesn't answer it...
edyinthesky 2 years ago
what would be really cool is if they could point the hubble anywhere dark and see the same cluster of galaxies; only each view would be from a different angle or perspective. Maybe it's our own cluster we're seeing. That blows my mind, I may have to start using drugs again.
jimn35 2 years ago
combine those 2 things and be amazed like i am atm
timen1986 2 years ago
Let me guess, you're a Steady State guy, huh? Hahaha.
Shmiggle2000 2 years ago
I find the Steady State theory quite similar to the big bang theory... The only Big difference is that the big bang says it was all created in "1 Bang", while the steady state says that creation of matter and/or energy is continuous. While steady state does not express itself over a starting point. If it's a law in physics leading to the Big Bang, why did it only occur once... Although I don't find any of these theories credible, in previous perspective I find Steady State less incredible.
edyinthesky 2 years ago
i agree
nadonai 2 years ago
The answers have always been there, but like the religionists of Jesus' day, many people have blinded their eyes, shut their ears, and hardened their hearts to answers that did not match their human theories or their chosen life-style. (Matthew 13:14, 15)
nadonai 2 years ago
You mean like all religionists today, who all believe in their own version of god, a thing/body/theory that is based on not a single piece of proof? Heck, praying to my trash more sense to me, cause at least I know it's there for real...(and who knows it might have more powers than your imaginative god)
edyinthesky 2 years ago
PRAISE! ;)
skajellafetty 2 years ago
Comment removed
edyinthesky 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
:S
.................
pinguinmaster342 2 years ago
Nice voice and use of words
SplitSec0nds 2 years ago
If only all of humanity paid more attention to the much grander scheme of things in the universe, who could say what we would learn. The discoveries and insights gained from this can only be called humbling, as the true word to describe them has yet to be coined by humanity in any language.
Thank you from us all, Hubble.
SynapticBoomstick 2 years ago 3
Excellent, sir. You certainly have a way with words.
sumopromark 2 years ago
Let us put it all in prospective. This picture is of a area of our sky when your looking up at night the size of a grain of sand held away from your eye at arms length. And it contains thousands of galaxies and trillion upon trillions of stars. Each star has the possiblility of life. There is a good chance when your looking at that picture your looking at millions of worlds with species far more advanced than we. Did one of the hundreds of gods that humans have thought up create all this. No
hutchjohn1 2 years ago 5
yes it seems much more likely to win the lottery if you play every day right? like if you play for a million years you much surely win, right ? hmmm....
providencetonlist 2 years ago
great lead guitar by david gilmour
fridogg 2 years ago
Got to love Shine On You Crazy Diamond...
tduffy2 2 years ago
i thought that was really random with Numa Numa song :)
cindybreanne 2 years ago 2
Perfect, A video that will humble anyone who watches it that has even a small understanding of what he is demonstrating. The best demonstration since Carl Sagen. Thanks
hutchjohn1 2 years ago 2
Anything is possible, the rules change when your point of view changes. Then there is dimensional shifts. Who is to say the so called speed of light is constant in different realms, in holes, in quasars?
Honeysucklebommie 2 years ago
I didn't think bulldoodoo, but I did do a double take. No big bang? I thought it had been pretty much proved.
But it took a long time for Copernicus to be proved right. It took technology and direct observation to establish some new truths about the nature of the universe. Even then, when Galileo could prove the new paradigm, few ventured to even look into his telescope.
So I checked out that holoscience website. Some hours later, I found myself still skeptical but intrigued. What if?
hopeso 2 years ago