definitely, indigo is great for photorealistic stills, not so much for animation because the rendertime is extremely long. but you can get really good results with little effort with it. mainly because it comes with a huge material library.
if you like the result of 1 second rendering.. then yes, but if you like a high qualitiy rendered picture, then you have to wait for hours or even days.. because the longer you let indigo render your image the lesser noise there is and the better is the quality ..
if i had used the bleder internal rederer you would be right but as this scene is redered with the indigo rederer, which reders based on the laws of physics, the redertime is quite high. 4 simple shapes cant really show indigos potential but it is possible to get photorealistic results with little effort . what this video shows is indigos redering in a timelapse, it starts off grainy and becomes cleaner. contrary to bleder the render is never finished, it ends when you quit the process
yafray is a cool piece, i hardly use it for some reason. it works well when you need more precision that blemder internal but dont have enough time for an indigo render.
Time-lapse?
Dark0Lord7 1 year ago
Hmmm, this whole indigo stuff seems like a weaker version of Maxwell render.
Trust me Maxwell is the very best. Works on the same principles. Free materials and stunning results. Also rewards patience.
Google Maxwell Render, V2.0.27 is the latest right now.
gleelash 1 year ago
does any perv see anything wrong with thisw picture lol
corrupted111 1 year ago
so you recomend Indigo for HQ images render?
aldocristopher 2 years ago
definitely, indigo is great for photorealistic stills, not so much for animation because the rendertime is extremely long. but you can get really good results with little effort with it. mainly because it comes with a huge material library.
GublyGubly 2 years ago
Okay, bro. I'll try Indigo especially coz it's Free as blender.
Thankz!!!
aldocristopher 2 years ago
@GublyGubly Will you be entering the blender world cup sir?
mrjimmyos 1 year ago
u should make a tutorial on indigo caustics :D
i am new to indigo, and i've been looking around for some good tutorials and there are hardly any!
Sniper500igb 2 years ago
automatic win
Axisistilter345 2 years ago
doesn't seem like much as a video, but congrats on a beautiful render.
55vadamee 2 years ago 2
Indigo seems to reward patience... Nice scene!
Arqui3D 3 years ago 2
GublyGubly : contrary to bleder the render is never finished, it ends when you quit the process
So you are saying that indigo rendering is much faster than blender rendering ?
amsunaakage 3 years ago 2
if you like the result of 1 second rendering.. then yes, but if you like a high qualitiy rendered picture, then you have to wait for hours or even days.. because the longer you let indigo render your image the lesser noise there is and the better is the quality ..
XeXes1988 3 years ago 3
1hr 30min, what do you have a 386?
onjoFilms 3 years ago
if i had used the bleder internal rederer you would be right but as this scene is redered with the indigo rederer, which reders based on the laws of physics, the redertime is quite high. 4 simple shapes cant really show indigos potential but it is possible to get photorealistic results with little effort . what this video shows is indigos redering in a timelapse, it starts off grainy and becomes cleaner. contrary to bleder the render is never finished, it ends when you quit the process
GublyGubly 3 years ago
Have you tried Yafray?
onjoFilms 3 years ago
yafray is a cool piece, i hardly use it for some reason. it works well when you need more precision that blemder internal but dont have enough time for an indigo render.
GublyGubly 3 years ago