3) Such persons have pre-existing mental disorders. Such is usually the case considering the majority of people who are exposed to LSD-25 in the current system which outlaws it are people who are seeking not spiritual awareness or an avenue to practice mystic religions but rather an escape from the mental anguish they are experiencing as a result of any number of psychological disorders (depression, anxiety, phobias, PTSD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, etc.).
2) Such persons are young and do not have fully developed brains, or adequate knowledge and experience to be engaging in any sort os substance use or abuse (including alcohol).
The instances which most of you refer to where, "kids" have been seriously injured while under the influence of LSD are usually the result of a variety of things OTHER than the ingestion of LSD-25.
1) Said persons are intoxicated on a variety of substances and are experiencing symptoms of substance-induced delirium, which results when an inadequate supply of blood reaches the brain.
substance, can be dangerous, although it is not nearly as dangerous as the recreational use of alcohol. My depiction of acid use in this video is very far from the reality of it and it is meant as a JOKE. I do not advocate widespread recreational use of the drug, I advocate regulated use in conjuction with spiritual meditation and ritual. Which I guarantee would do an exponentially less amount of damage then our society's current use of alcohol.
regulations, it takes a great deal of knowledge in chemistry to effectively derrive LSD-25 from the ergot fungus... such should only be performed in labs. Also, on the distribution end, I'm not advocating selling the stuff in grocery stores, I'm advocating allowing people to apply to a system that judges whether or not they are of sound mind enough to engage in the use of LSD for purposes of SPIRITUAL MEDITATION AND RITUAL. Recreational use of acid, like any other
LSD on the other hand is a tool for spiritual ritual, and, by statistical study, when it was legal, in the form of the pharmaceutical drug delysid, had an extremely lower instance of abuse then alcohol, and incidently, also than marijuana. I do not support the abuse of anything, and young children using LSD is definitely an instance of abuse, just as young children using alcohol is an instance of abuse. I support the legalization of LSD, but it must be under specific
As for the argument about LSD, the occurrence of accidents in no way merits outlawing a drug that has less physically damaging effects then alcohol. Alcohol abuse is proven to increase rates of depression and suicide, it destroys the liver and can lead to heart problems, it causes accidents of all kinds (in and out of automobiles), and worst of all, it leads many young people to engage in violent criminal behavior, yet it is practically forced upon the youth of American society.
Uh no, sorry dude but "accidents" do happen in situations rather than just driving a car. People don't understand the difference between fact and fiction. I've seen it happen to kids.
And your diss on supricky?? Hmmm i understand, that's what jealous kids do.
Supricky has interesting and well thought out videos and he's popular because of it...not JUST his drunken videos. He actually had a gig on tv. Where have you've gotten in life? Oh yeah infront of your camera lens.
Yes, that is true, people, like yourself do not understand the difference between fact and fiction. I am not a kid by the way you discriminatory asshole, and I am not a moron with little education aspiring to get famous by entertaining subintelligent masses with reinforcements of malicious socialization. I've done a lot more things of importance with my life than supricky06 has, I seriously doubt he's
ever done anything to help anyone. And by the way, the only reason I am insulting to supricky06 is because I personally dislike him, you not having any contextual awareness of that, granted, can easily make a mistake based on your biased and overgeneralized views. I called him a Dane Cook wannabe, which in no way was meant as an insult, and he began to send me messages of an extremely rude and insulting manner. I don't care whatsoever
about popularity amongst American internet users, in actuality I really don't care about popularity on youtube at all, if I did, I would be making videos that were catered to marketing demographics and stereotyped social groups. I make videos on youtube for my own personal enjoyment, not create a band on followers.
Pretty much all of what you said was covered in my comment. The symptoms you are describing are of someone who has used LSD while having a pre-existing mental disorder such as schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder.
The "accidents" you are referring to are usually the result of complete and total idiots who drive while intoxicated. Bad idea while on anything, and considering that alcohol causes hundreds of thousands of such deaths, yet is still legal, I don't think there's much of a point against it in that.
Mental addiction to LSD only occurs in people who have and addictive/compulsive personality. These people can get addicted to pretty much ANYTHING including something as innocuous as YouTube.
And the last sentence you said, which actually, the way you wrote it, makes no sense, is again related to LSD's ability to trigger the surfacing of or episodes of pre-existing mental disorders.
LSD is not a dangerous drug and in fact, is very useful in the practice of various mystic religions, its illegalization was an attack on freedom of religion and it should be decriminalized.
Oh and by the way, try doing some research on LSD... it has absolutely no damaging physical effects, no scientists have ever been able to produce and LD50 in test subjects (that would be an overdose level if you're an idiot, which I'm sure is true), and the whole idea about flashbacks? Well its mostly hype, the only people who ever experience flashbacks are the ones who had pre-existing mental disorders which they agitated by doing a hallucinogen.
this sucks
suprick06 4 years ago
ily! :]
lol
nancyatthedisco 4 years ago
you should be a comedian
lulululu101 5 years ago
Somebody obviously has entirely too much time on their hands. Christ, write an essay next time.
ChyeahKthx 5 years ago
3) Such persons have pre-existing mental disorders. Such is usually the case considering the majority of people who are exposed to LSD-25 in the current system which outlaws it are people who are seeking not spiritual awareness or an avenue to practice mystic religions but rather an escape from the mental anguish they are experiencing as a result of any number of psychological disorders (depression, anxiety, phobias, PTSD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, etc.).
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
2) Such persons are young and do not have fully developed brains, or adequate knowledge and experience to be engaging in any sort os substance use or abuse (including alcohol).
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
The instances which most of you refer to where, "kids" have been seriously injured while under the influence of LSD are usually the result of a variety of things OTHER than the ingestion of LSD-25.
1) Said persons are intoxicated on a variety of substances and are experiencing symptoms of substance-induced delirium, which results when an inadequate supply of blood reaches the brain.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
substance, can be dangerous, although it is not nearly as dangerous as the recreational use of alcohol. My depiction of acid use in this video is very far from the reality of it and it is meant as a JOKE. I do not advocate widespread recreational use of the drug, I advocate regulated use in conjuction with spiritual meditation and ritual. Which I guarantee would do an exponentially less amount of damage then our society's current use of alcohol.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
regulations, it takes a great deal of knowledge in chemistry to effectively derrive LSD-25 from the ergot fungus... such should only be performed in labs. Also, on the distribution end, I'm not advocating selling the stuff in grocery stores, I'm advocating allowing people to apply to a system that judges whether or not they are of sound mind enough to engage in the use of LSD for purposes of SPIRITUAL MEDITATION AND RITUAL. Recreational use of acid, like any other
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
LSD on the other hand is a tool for spiritual ritual, and, by statistical study, when it was legal, in the form of the pharmaceutical drug delysid, had an extremely lower instance of abuse then alcohol, and incidently, also than marijuana. I do not support the abuse of anything, and young children using LSD is definitely an instance of abuse, just as young children using alcohol is an instance of abuse. I support the legalization of LSD, but it must be under specific
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
As for the argument about LSD, the occurrence of accidents in no way merits outlawing a drug that has less physically damaging effects then alcohol. Alcohol abuse is proven to increase rates of depression and suicide, it destroys the liver and can lead to heart problems, it causes accidents of all kinds (in and out of automobiles), and worst of all, it leads many young people to engage in violent criminal behavior, yet it is practically forced upon the youth of American society.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
Uh no, sorry dude but "accidents" do happen in situations rather than just driving a car. People don't understand the difference between fact and fiction. I've seen it happen to kids.
And your diss on supricky?? Hmmm i understand, that's what jealous kids do.
Supricky has interesting and well thought out videos and he's popular because of it...not JUST his drunken videos. He actually had a gig on tv. Where have you've gotten in life? Oh yeah infront of your camera lens.
ChyeahKthx 5 years ago
Yes, that is true, people, like yourself do not understand the difference between fact and fiction. I am not a kid by the way you discriminatory asshole, and I am not a moron with little education aspiring to get famous by entertaining subintelligent masses with reinforcements of malicious socialization. I've done a lot more things of importance with my life than supricky06 has, I seriously doubt he's
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
ever done anything to help anyone. And by the way, the only reason I am insulting to supricky06 is because I personally dislike him, you not having any contextual awareness of that, granted, can easily make a mistake based on your biased and overgeneralized views. I called him a Dane Cook wannabe, which in no way was meant as an insult, and he began to send me messages of an extremely rude and insulting manner. I don't care whatsoever
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
about popularity amongst American internet users, in actuality I really don't care about popularity on youtube at all, if I did, I would be making videos that were catered to marketing demographics and stereotyped social groups. I make videos on youtube for my own personal enjoyment, not create a band on followers.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
to create a band of followers*
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
Well u r doing shit resource then.
Why it's dangerous?
-You might get mental addiction-you want to get more LSD
-You cannot predict consequences, sometimes people see scary dreams.LSD effect stays for many hours and many people feel panic and terrible awe.
-LSD user may get angry and may become violent.User may get feeling that someone is stalking him
-There are many accidents happend,because the user doesn't make sense that is that "real" or just "dream"
-Long period users may become lunatic.
inside1337 5 years ago
Pretty much all of what you said was covered in my comment. The symptoms you are describing are of someone who has used LSD while having a pre-existing mental disorder such as schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
The "accidents" you are referring to are usually the result of complete and total idiots who drive while intoxicated. Bad idea while on anything, and considering that alcohol causes hundreds of thousands of such deaths, yet is still legal, I don't think there's much of a point against it in that.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
Mental addiction to LSD only occurs in people who have and addictive/compulsive personality. These people can get addicted to pretty much ANYTHING including something as innocuous as YouTube.
And the last sentence you said, which actually, the way you wrote it, makes no sense, is again related to LSD's ability to trigger the surfacing of or episodes of pre-existing mental disorders.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
LSD is not a dangerous drug and in fact, is very useful in the practice of various mystic religions, its illegalization was an attack on freedom of religion and it should be decriminalized.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
Oh and by the way, try doing some research on LSD... it has absolutely no damaging physical effects, no scientists have ever been able to produce and LD50 in test subjects (that would be an overdose level if you're an idiot, which I'm sure is true), and the whole idea about flashbacks? Well its mostly hype, the only people who ever experience flashbacks are the ones who had pre-existing mental disorders which they agitated by doing a hallucinogen.
WordsMakeTheMan 5 years ago
omg I fucking love it!!! You rock!
darkfaery001 5 years ago
<3 Jim Morrison.
sdstarlightqt 5 years ago
You crack my ass up!
Princessdragon 5 years ago