I love you all, my brothers and sisters! If you really want to dig deep into the Gospel of Jesus Christ, read The Gospel Q. Before the four Gospels were written, there were The Saying of Jesus. At that time, it was Jewish custom to write down the wise sayings of Jews. They have never found a copy of this Gospel but believe it existed and confirmed when you read in several books of the New Testament where Paul preaches the Gospel. He didn't preach the Gospels. It was in Antioch that the co
Freemasons are NOT allowed to tell anyone thats not a freemason what goes on in their temple. I have a friend that is one and he won't tell me anything. They take a blood oath saying they will not talk about their temple cerimonies to anyone except other freemasons. The pentegram has been a satanic symbol further back than 1966. Joseph Smith was one thats why they have them on the temples in Salt Lake and Navouoo, MO. Would you enter a church with a pentegram on it? Its also used in Wicca.
@beatleman69 You probably never knew but an upright pentagram was considered a symbol of good luck originally (only inverted pentagrams were considered unlucky), and the "All-Seeing Eye" which you fools call Satanic is called the Eye of Providence, which is in fact a symbolism of the Christian God. "Satanism" was invented as a hoax in the 19th century. Then 20th century cults played along with the joke and called themselves "Satanists". The true Satanists of this world don't use symbols...
@beatleman69 Also, pretty much about everyone knows what goes on in Masonic lodges these days. There's nothing "hidden" anymore. Since it's been discovered that Masons actually do not do anything Satanic in their lodges, conspiracy theorists now have to forcibly adhere to the hypothesis that "only 33rd degree Freemasons are actually Luciferian" which is completely bogus. Did you go on Wikipedia yet and typed in "Taxil Hoax" yet? Please do, it'll do you some good.
@shiverleaf15 Watch this video, if you cannot see the satanic/masonic connection with mormonism, then you are blind. youtube.com/watch?v=lRgi0XT8Fg8 There is no conspirity theorist here, just hard evidence!
@beatleman69 When i try to load that link it just takes me straight to the Youtube main page. Anyway, i'm interested to see so-called "evidence" about Satanic influences in Mormonism or even Freemasonry for that matter. I've seen so much "evidence" and then done my own research and uncovered it all to be libel. Stop slandering Freemasons and Latter-day Saints. Like i said, all attempts to link Masons with Satan are bogus. Much of it has even been DISPROVEN as fraudulent hoaxes (e.g. Taxil Hoax).
He's wrong about Moses, Abraham and Noah being "prophets". This guy in the video sounds so happy, or should I say spirtually dead. He has no joy in his heart, Jesus brings joy into ones heart after receiving him as their personal saviour, this guy don't have that. A false jesus can't do that, especially when, in the mormon faith, jesus and satan are brothers, that gives satan equel rights as jesus has. Do I see freemason influences here since freemasons are luciferian.
@beatleman69 Freemasons are not Luciferian. I know where you are getting these ideas from. Conspiracy theories, yes? They got it from Albert Pike (a Freemason), supposedly. But the truth is, a man named Leo Taxil published the quote in a book "exposing" Freemasonry, claiming Pike made the quote, and then that man came out and said the entire book was a hoax to attack Freemasons and make fun of Catholics when they fell into the trap of thinking the book was real. Look it up, the Taxil Hoax.
@shiverleaf15 Sorry but freemasons are luciferian. For one thing they have "secrets" that they are forbiden to tell any outsider, if you have noticed yet on their temples and on freemasons cars they have a inverted pentegram, a symbol of satanism. They deny Jesus Christ as deity (God), they use the all seeing eye of Isiris, the ancient egyptian god. They refer their head of their lodges as worshipful master. Look up freemasons on youtube and/or google it, you'll find out they are luciferian.
@beatleman69 masonry is not a religion. religion is not allowed to be discussed in lodges. any man can join, so it's not that secret once a man is in. the pentagram was adopted by anton levey in 1966 with the founding of satanism as an accepted religion (with the head of baphomet inside). the pentagram has been around way longer than 1966. you have no idea what you are talking about (even though i'm sure you consider yourself an expert from all the youtube videos you've seen). get the facts.
Galations 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. II Corinthians 11:13-15 13: For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14:And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 15: Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of rightousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
His statement about their own bible another scripture? Lets see what the Bible says about that. Galations 1:6-8 6:I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel. 7:Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8:But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you that that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
A church domination cannot save you, only the blood of Christ can wash away your sins by repenting of your wicked ways and ask Jesus in your heart and life. There was a fire revival in the colonies at Joseph Smith's time, why would he question what church to belong to? Jesus didn't start a domination, he started His church with believers in Him, not in man. Smith was a freemason, thats why he claimed to see God and Jesus, sorry but there's only one God: Isaiah 43:10-11.
Please tell me where in the Bible you find the handshakes, the pagan symbols and rituals such as the Five Points through the Veil, which CAN be found in freemason/druid rituals. (google five points of fellowship). God came to bring his kingdom (see biblegateway keyword). Hebrew root word for apostole in Greek is malak, meaning messenger. The gospels speak of 12 disciples, students and the early ecclesia (assemblies) were house churches and small groups.
@GmaM11 2 Thessalonians 2:15 reminds Christians to hold fast to the traditions of God handed unto his Church. Do Protestants do that? Early Christians took part in the Endowment ceremonies and that can be proven. For example, the Washing and Anointing of the LDS is described nearly identically by Cyril of Jerusalem's 21st Catechetical Lecture. Of note is the fact that he says that only those who take part in that ceremony are worthy of being called "Christians".
@teriiura Like you said, mormons can say, "I believe The Book of Mormon to be the word of God, as far as it is translated, correctly: seeing that it has been changed, numerous times."
@shiverleaf15 i will try to respond your questions briefly and if you would like to talk more about them i
would be happy to if time allows i am tired and need to sleep soon however 1 the church is not a denomination but the body of Christ the key thing that makes them true is who Jesus is and was, God in the flesh alpha and omega the creator of everything this is where the lds beliefs fall short and you do indeed follow another Christ if you are lds.
@shiverleaf15 2 The Bible.. this is the word of God and the manual for life this is 66 books written by 40 guys written in 3 languages over 1500 of years. Paul wrote 2 ti 3:16 all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for Doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. doctrine
(whats right) reproof (what not right) and lastly how to get it right.
@shiverleaf15 3 i would disagree with you that the old testiment does confirm the new there are hundreds of prophesies literally fulfilled by Jesus Christ i will give you references for a few Gen. 12:1-3, 22:18,
Gen 49:10, 2 Samuel 7:12, Micah 5:2, Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah 35:5-6, Psalm 118:22, Daniel 9:24-26,
Psalm 22:16-18, Isaiah 53; Zech 12:10, Psalm 16:10. Paul also explains why the jews would disagree in romans 11:25
@shiverleaf15 4 God answers prayers in a variety of ways especially in regard to learning his word somtime you will over hear something a lot of times conveniently you will find the answer in the word somtimes audibly God is not confined to answering prayer by one given means danial went on a 21 day fast waiting for a answer to his prayer, but know with surety that he does answer prayer i personally try to thank him for the ones he doesn't answer, man proposes God disposes
Jesus is the ONLY Truth! Here is what we call false Teaching because If you believe the Bible, it is impossible to believe Mormonism period. The New Tastement contradicts with mormon doctrines, like the Bible teaches that there is no marriage in heaven, the Temple of God is in the hearts of Believers, Jesus is the Only High Priest, Salvation is by Grace alone and not of works. There are many more but those are the main Ones. Anyway, they do'nt believe in One God but billions of them somewhere.
@a3zfasi If you believe in the Old Testament, a Jew would tell you it's impossible to believe in the New Testament because Judaism heavily contradicts with Christian doctrines. Do you see the flaw of your logic?
If you believe that you are Mormon and follow Christ, then you have been misinformed and/or manipulated. I have submitted my life to Christ. You need to know that you are making a choice between a church of the utmost deceit and Jesus Christ. I love you and I pray for you all. Please read your Bible. Mathew, Mark, Romans, Corinthians,Galatians it doesn't matter, just read the New Testament and make a choice between His Promise and your church's. Galatians 1:6-9. This is haunting for u
hahahahhahahaha LIARS!! mormons only believe in the bible as long as "it's translated correctly" meaning that if everyone outside mormonism shows the mormons that the bible doesnt talk about the book of mormon, the mormons will NOT believe/trust the bible! and i have news for you mormons... the bible never.... NEVER talks about the book of mormon!! this nonsense is the same as imagining in gold plates! it's simply not there! stop making stuff up mormons!!
@MALDITTOROKKERO Again, just like i told the other fellow here; a Jew could apply this same flawed logic of yours to Christianity overall, and say that Jesus misapplied Jewish prophecies to himself, and that Christianity is heavily disproved by the Old Testament, and that Jesus was a "master of excuses", etc. So why are you a Christian, if the logic you use against Mormonism would disprove your own religion too according to Judaism? I think that's a bit hypocritical of you.
"Even Mormon apologists have to admit that many of the variants are only minor in nature. Dr. Anderson, a Mormon scholar and authority in the LDS Church on biblical manuscripts, also recognises that the variations in the New Testament manuscripts are essentially insignificant. Anderson notes the overwhelming agreement between the thousands of manuscripts; he explains that '...all manuscripts agree on the essential correctness of 99% of the verses in the New Testament...
“But even if we or an angel from heaven (moroni) should preach to you a gospel other than what we have preached to you, curse be on him!” Galatians 1:6-9 Mormon’s are not prepared for the coming apocalypse, Huge Sorrow will be to the mormon who refuse to see the truth, You have been warned your fall will be great. Read the BIBLE ONLY!
Rom 10:3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to (establish their own righteousness), have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. 2Cr 11:13 For such [are] false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 15 Therefore [it is] no great thing if his, ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. (the 3rd article of faith and Sec.132 D&C is evidence)
the book of mormon and the bible do not go hand in hand...the mormons believe they were once in heaven created by heavenly father and a heavenly mother. imagine how much sex is going on in heaven...MY GOD WAS NEVER A CREATED BEING, . MY GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH AS WELL AS THE PLAN FOR SALVATION. mormons don t believe that, they believe they can enter heaven on their own merit. now that is nothing to sneeze at, they believe that they are better than God so the attitude shows
are you kidding me... I know beyond this earth that you mormons believe that the bible is only as correct as your prophets interpret. Was in not joe who stated "the bible is not really correct but the book of mormon is more correct" I beg to differ since I know the book of mormon has more than 2000 grammatical changes and puts Jesus born in Jerusalem. I would rather believe the bible than just a book. The BIBLE is inspired GOD BREATHED, the book of mormon on the other hand is just fiction
@MrBigbear6718 Hey the Bible somewhere also says that Jesus would be born in Jerusalem in the Old Testament. The word "Jerusalem" was not restricted to the city, but also to its close environs, including the town of Bethlehem. The so-called 2000 grammatical changes are just that, grammar. The KJV has changed words, such as adding in unicorns and dragons where the original text said "re'em" and jackals respectively. I don't judge the Bible for its grammatical changes, do you?
@shiverleaf15 you are wrong. completely wrong. jerusalem was a walled city; this means everything inside the walls was jerusalem. everything else isn't. go read micah 5:2-5, matthew 2:1, or luke 1:4-6 then go read alma 7:10. the fact that we have the dead sea scrolls, tanakh, torah, talmud, targums, and vulgate (over 26,000 manuscripts in all that comprise the cannon of biblical text) for us to refer to is all the proof you need.
@yourelameface Luke 2:4 calls Jerusalem the city of David. 2 Kings 14:20 and 1 Chronicles 11:5 call Jerusalem the city of David. Several Bible scholars and Christians consider the town of Bethlehem to be sort of like a "suburb" of Jerusalem. The BoM says Jesus was born in the land of Jerusalem, not in the city.
@shiverleaf15 nope. "and behold, he shall be born of mary at jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers..." never in the entire bible is this city referred to as a land. the city of david reference is in regards to both the birth place of david (bethlehem) while the other was conquered by david (city of jebus). within the 1 chronicles passage the cities are set apart. v5 points out david was at the stronghold (jerusalem) while v16 says the philistines were at bethlehem. there is distinction.
@shiverleaf15 matthew states bethlehem is in "the land of judah (matt 2:6, cf. luke 2:4). judah is the "land;" jerusalem is a "city" (zach 2:6, matt 5:35), and so is bethlehem (luke 2:4). twice matthew refers to "land of israel" (2:20-21) and the to the "city of nazareth" (v23). there isn't a single lexical source that defines the term "city" to mean a "land." biblical writers didn't have suburbs, they had walls that defined cities. they also didn't confuse "land" and "city."
FHE fun: The more FHE blogs I find, the more I rejoice, it's so nice to have so many great FHE online lesson plans! And the ones posted on each Monday at LDS Family Night Fun are no exception. Find themes, scriptures, activities, lessons, and refreshment ideas all pulled together in a fabulous and easily accessible organization.
Disneyland guide: Thinking about taking a trip to Disneyland this summer? Don't go without checking The Disneyland Guide for LDS Families, a blog that "began its life as a manuscript for a book that was never published, so there is a ton of content here." Find places to stay, transportation tips, ways to best navigate the park, and much more.
Ballard, you are a dried-up weed who subscribes to the "fake it til you make it" philosophy. After all, this was what you learned to do, in the '50s, when that was such a common thing to believe.
Don't have a testimony of the Gospel? Bear it, until to get one! (viz, Fake it, until you Make it)
Don't have the associated "Gifts" of your calling, yet? Well, Ballard, just FAKE IT UNTIL YOU MAKE IT.
In short, just keep on pretending: that way nobody will know, for sure!
Well....the acoustics make your voice "boom right out there", fo' shizzle.
But, Melvin...Russell...Ballard....you are nothing like the Savior who you tell Mormons to be like! In your media interview (where you take along Quentin Cook, a "junior" apostle), you say that you want to be perceived in a certain way.
BEHOLD, Christ going around saying to the people: "please perceive me in a certain way. Okay?"
You sound awfully, awfully needy, Mr. Elder Melvin Russ Ballard.
Friberg published an explanation of his works in the December 1952 issue of the Children’s Friend, with four illustrations following in the January through April 1953 issues. Another four paintings appeared in the first four months of 1954, but the final four were published intermittently from 1961 through 1963.
Eight of the illustrations were first published in a softcover edition of the Book of Mormon itself in 1961. Subsequent paperbound editions of the scripture still contain several of the Friberg compositions.
Here we are again, another "apostle" suppressing the truth in unrighteousness.
Time spent in the BoM would be much better spent in the 66 Books of the Bible. BoM is a watered down "bible" with enormous credibility issues as to historicity. It is blatantly racist. It is a bait book, a book to bastardize Bible belief, & lead to D&C & PoGP, where by far most of Mormon doctrine that separates the LDS church from Christianity is written.
You bring up the book of Enoch and yes it is quoted in the bible and yet, it is not in the codex. If God wanted it in there it would be in there now wouldn't it?
There are other manuscripts or books that don't make the bible but at least we know of them and can read and touch them.
@Noffy1111 So Noffy when you going to answer that question I asked you? A Biblical case in point is what occurred on the Mount of Transfiguration (Matt. 17:1-9). There, God the Father's voice was heard testifying that Jesus was His Beloved Son. Moses and Elias also appeared to the three apostles and Jesus on that occasion. Later, Christ admonished Peter, James and John to "tell the vision to no man, until the Son of Man be risen again from the dead" (Matt. 17:9). Clearly he was telling
@Noffy1111 What evidence do you have of the only temple is to be built on Mount Moriah? I didn't see you quote any scriptures? Sounds like hear say to me.
This post is for all you mormons that want to know the truth. The council of Nicaea did do some things like confirm what the early church had as its bible and yes they did confirm the trinity. But understand this clearly.
The catholic church was started under Constantine of Rome. You must understand that the catholic church is just a big of cult as the mormon church is with pagan rituals and rites.
The trinity is clearly taught and was taught from the very beginning.
@Noffy1111 Find somewhere some Christian that believed in the Trinity before 300 AD. I told you I had already answered the question you can't find one. Although I can reference you early Christians that believed they were 3 separate individuals.
@BOON70 You see this is where you go off the tracks. If they believe in three separate gods and not one God with three personages then they are not Christian.
@Noffy1111 That's incorrect, and i'd suggest you compare several parts of Tertullian's Against Praxeas with Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho. Because the truth is, the Trinity is a teaching of the Montanists, not the original Christians. I could show you what i mean if you're interested. Most Trinitarians have sadly never even heard of the word "Montanism".
This post is for all you Trinitarians who want to know the truth.
You may think well you tripped up you said you can. That might be because some of the books I can give reference too. You can find at your local library and you can read it for yourself.
Looks to me like you contradict yourself again. What is the definition of are? pres. indic. pl. and 2nd pers. sing. of be. dictionary com. What is the definition of the be they are talking about. –verb (used without object)1. to exist or live: Shakespeare's “To be or not to be” is the ultimate question. 2. to take place; happen; occur: The wedding was last week. 3.to occupy a place or position: The book is on the table. 4.to continue or remain as before: Let things be.
to belong; attend; befall: May good fortune be with you. 6 (used as a copula to connect the subject with its predicate adjective, or predicate nominative, in order to describe, identify, or amplify the subject): Martha is tall. John is president. This is she. 7 (used as a copula to introduce or form interrogative or imperative sentences): Is that right? Be quiet! Don't be facetious. –auxiliary verb
@Noffy1111 About you saying it didn't begin at Nicaea in 325 AD find me somewhere a reference that talks of the Trinity you can't use the Bible for this either. Find somewhere some early Christian that the doctrine of the Trinity is true before 300 AD. I will help you out on this one you can't. But about what I told you about you can and I can give reference. The Trinity is made up.
@BOON70 NOT USE THE BIBLE. How ignorant can you really be. The bible is the sole source of authority and I will use it above any and all other sources.
The trinity was well known long before the Nicaea council ever met. What you are either ignorant in or deceptive in is this.
The council of Nicaea was not ever be the deciding factor in what is church or what is not church. The early church had the apostolic writings and had their bible long before the council of Nicaea.
In light of the scriptures I have given it is very clear God is a trinity. Also my book has established itself as accurate reliable History with people witnessing these events and recording them.
Of the two Books I will be trusting the Holy Word of God and not your your book of satan.
You have been told the truth and if you reject Christ as 'THE' God as the EVERLASTING FATHER, then you are not CHRISTIAN.
@Noffy1111 Agamemnon to the wars is gone. dictionary com According to the all definitions of I and my Father "are" one. Doesn't fit. It would have to be is one. No where do they say is one they only say are one. As to say work as one. Again I ask the question, why is Christ called the Father? But about answering the spirit brothers question. Do you remember me asking about the other books of the Bible that are not included in the Bible when are going to answer that question?
@BOON70 I did answer that questions already. Their are no other books of the bible. What is there is there. The people long before the Nicaea had their book. It was based on apostolic authority. It may have bot been been in book form yet but they had it.
@Noffy1111 That is because you decided to answer the question now wither their is books added or not when you see no references for the such. Matt 2:23 .. spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene. Where else does it say Christ will be a Nazarene? Jude 1:14 Enoch also . . . prophesied of these. Enoch is barely mentioned and there are no prophesies so where are they? Don't forget the other books too Josh. 10: 13, 2 Chr. 9:29, 2 Chr. 12:15, and 2 Chr 20:34.
@Noffy1111 So what your saying is what they are quoting isn't scripture because it is from somewhere else other than the Bible? So if they found the Book of Nathan the prophet even though its mentioned in the Bible it wouldn't be part of the word of God? Question was Nathan a prophet? So if Nathan wrote wouldn't that mean it is the word of God? Question do know how the King James Bible was put together take note its the most widely used as well.
@BOON70 There are extra biblical sources this I do not argue. Yes I know how the KJV came about.
I happen to own the book of ENOCH and yes Jude does quote it but it is still not in the bible.
There is only one Holy Bible and it is God breathed besides it there are no other bibles.
The KJV bible is no longer the most widely used any longer. That distinction now belongs to the NIV and it is a corrupted text. It's founding is in the Alexandrian text and not Textus Receptus.
@Noffy1111 The book of Enoch is found in the Dead Sea Scrolls as well as Wikipedia agrees with this. But about other books it says in John 3:16 For God so loved the world... So God loves the world? So why didn't he have his word into all people of the Earth? God supposedly loves everyone on Earth. So why didn't he have his word to everyone on Earth at all times when they were willing to receive it? If not so God doesn't love the world.
@Noffy1111 Also about the Book of Enoch being mentioned in the Bible why would Jude quote from something that is not a divine source or of God? Question why would they quote from any of the books I mentioned unless they were of divine value? Question was Nathan chosen by God to be a prophet, what about Enoch, and what about the others that I mentioned? If you know how the King James Bible came about enlighten me.
@BOON70 Tell me if these have been translated correctly. Rev 19:13 And he [was] clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. Rev 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. Rev 21:14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
@awolLDSasap Hmm I find it odd you don't answer the question I gave to notify. I can answer your question, but you answer me first because I asked first. Oh and just to let you know your questions is very easy to answer.
@BOON70 This is going in circles. The only thing that is important is Jesus. Isaiah said that he is the Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace. The priesthood, laws, ordinances, temples reject the sacrifice on the cross.
@awolLDSasap How does the temple reject what Christ did? Does not the work the apostles did after the resurrection of Christ show that the work of God was not yet finished? What about people who go and repent does this not show the work of God has not ceased? Those who go about and preach the word of God does this not show that the work of God has not ceased? If so they do the work of God in vain. But yet we see that Paul, Peter, others continue to go to the temple after Christ?
@BOON70 Temple endowments add to the work that Jesus did. Jhn 10:1 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber. Jhn 10:7 Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep. There are no secrets to pass through the heavenly veil. Jesus is the only way to live with the Father.
@awolLDSasap John 10:1, 7 says nothing against endowments or the temple. What I find odd is many people say after Christ there was to be no more temples but yet the apostles continue to go to them after the death of Christ. Question what was the purpose of temples after Christ?
@BOON70 John doesn't say anything against endowments? That's because there never were any. Why did the apostles go to the temple afterwards? To teach the people. After the cross, there was no need for a temple. Remember, a "new temple built without hands"? The aposltes never performed secret ceremonies anywhere in the Jewish temple. You are deluded.
@awolLDSasap Sometimes I wonder if you guys read the scriptures because you take things so out of context or only tell part of the story only the part you like. Temple without hands? You forgot to quote one verse John 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body, he wasn't talking about the temple in Jerusalem. 1 Cor 6:9 it says our bodies are a temple of which the Holy Ghost can be if we are righteous. Next you don't know anything about temple recommends. No one is perfect those who are given
@BOON70 I know the temple walk, and I have a secret name. Want to know it? The spirit of God is among the people of God, not the experts, the ordained, apostles or prophet. Those with faith in the eternal God are "the bride of Christ, the temple built without hands". Each individual is part of the temple and the faithfull together make up the holy temple.
@awolLDSasap Sermon on the Mount to pray and fast in secret, promising that "thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly" (Matt. 6:18). In John 7:10 we have Christ going somewhere in secret, not openly. He made a clandestine journey from Galilee to Jerusalem to attend the feast of tabernacles. John's account tells us that "when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret."
@BOON70 Are you kiddinG? You find Jesus sneaking around so he wouldn't be noticed and you think lds ceremonies and temple secrets came from this? INSANE. Jesus said that he NEVER taught any secrets..
@awolLDSasap mockery or be made the object of raillery by carnal men. We can, however, speak in general terms of what is done in temples; we can name the ordinances and tell their purpose and intent; and we can quote from the scriptures such passages as speak in guarded and reserved terms of those things which are reserved for the faithful only." ( The Mortal Messiah, Vol.1, p.104 - p.105, Bruce R. McConkie)
@BOON70 You quote only air if you quote anything but the bible. The entire book of mormon is a fraud and has been proven so. If you do not leave this cult fast you will be left behind.
I want you to prove your doctrines with accurate reliable documents that are historically accurate.
@Noffy1111 I quote the Bible and its teaching and you ignore them. Like I said before you only go over what you want. Question why is there no mention of what I talked about over Matt 17, Heb 5, Matt 7 just like I said you only go over what you like. You only went over one of the many scriptures I brought up like I said I can quote you where you try and twist things to bend to your own views. Its not hard either because you do it in practically every post. Again why didn't you answer my question
@BOON70 Wanna hear Packers parable? Jesus must be paid back for his sacrifice because he's the debt collector for the father. You need to stop believing these guys. Gods grace cannot be purchased by any means.
"Wanna hear Packers parable? Jesus must be paid back for his sacrifice because he's the debt collector for the father. You need to stop believing these guys. Gods grace cannot be purchased by any means."
@Shulamitefire He starts the clip off saying the Bible is a miracle. What he should have said it's a miracle I'm holding this up in conference and only doing it to show people we believe in some parts of the Bible.
@awolLDSasap Yes, as when there is a conflict between the Bible & other writings, even in regard to main & plain Holy Spirit admonition & teaching, such as the ontology of God & man & soteriology, the Bible is tossed. This error & contempt for the Bible is certainly one major mark of every cult. Mormons have exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like unto Mormon man. They have exchanged the truth of the One Beautiful God, worshiping & serving creation vs the Creator.
@Shulamitefire Well spoken.. Mormons completely fail to realize the wicked are not word of wisdom breakers, "that they dearly hold onto as a means of worthiness" but those who alter and redefine His Word.
@awolLDSasap Depends on why you mean by redefining his word. Question who wrote out the scriptures and taught them to the people before and after Christ? What were they called? Without the priesthood no man has the authority from God no man has the authority to preach the Gospel. Not only this men receive degrees at big colleges so they can preach and this is how they get their authority but what does it say in the scriptures? Heb 5:4 No man taketh this honor unto himself, but he that is called
@BOON70 You have completely failed. There was no priesthood authority with the apostles. Jesus was the authority. His spirit was left with the aposltes to help them remember what he had taught them and NO ONE changed the New Testament. Why do you need names of authority to separate you from the Spirit of God?
@awolLDSasap When you come to answer that you can not answer you don't think about it for a while or even say I will have to do some research on that. You just try to change the subject. How would you feel if I ignored your questions?
@awolLDSasap Then why did Christ have to set ppl out to baptize ppl? He also called them Elders. John the Baptist had to have been baptized by someone. I say you would know the scripture about Baptism being a essential for baptism. If so how was it done and how did John receive his authority. This also presents another question why did Jesus have to be baptized by John? If authority isn't important Christ could be baptized by some guy down the street. Why go through all the effort of being
@BOON70 John was called by God alone. He wasn't baptized by someone in authority. He wasn't baptized at all. To be baptized, "you put on Christ" to become a follower of Jesus. Mormon doctrine has clouded your mind.
@awolLDSasap of God even as Aaron. How did Aaron receive the priesthood? This much I do not he didn't go to some school to receive a piece of paper that said he received it.
@awolLDSasap If the apostles didn't have authority they would not be able to baptize. Gal. 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. I asked you why they have the names because supposedly you know more about than I do, but if you go to about any Mormon they can answer this question. You also act as if you know more about my religion than I do. These are simple questions, but yet can't answer them.
@BOON70 Answering all of your questions. That's correct. Baptism shows that you are a follower of Christ, "put on Christ". You don't need anyone in authority to baptize. NO ONE baptized John the Baptist. Joseph and Sidney invented the lineage of authority. Your authority is not real. Don't keep asking the same questions.
@BOON70 I said no one baptized John the baptist. John was the Elijah figure who is the same as Elias.Luk 1:17 And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord. John the baptist was chosen by God, "never baptized" to be the precursor to the Lord.
@awolLDSasap Where does it say John the Baptist wasn't baptized? So this is an assumption you make otherwise hearsay. But what we do read that Christ was baptized. Why was Christ baptized? Of all people he didn't have to put on Christ because he was the Christ. So why then why was he baptized?
@awolLDSasap Just as I said before just because it doesn't say it doesn't mean that it didn't happen. John also received his authority to baptize from God. We also keep in mind why did Christ choose John? If authority wasn't important Christ would of been baptized by someone else because it would of been so much easier. Christ had to walk 70 miles to be baptized by John.
@awolLDSasap Thats nice to know but you didn't answer my question. Why did Christ choose John? Why not someone near by. It took Christ walking 70 miles to get to John.
@BOON70 He chose John because He is God. God chose John. When He was baptized by John, Jesus was showing the JEWS what they must do. Have faith, be baptized and received the Holy Ghost, "in that order". The gentiles were taught to have faith, receive the Holy Ghost and be baptized, "in that order".
@awolLDSasap Quoting awo "He chose John because He is God" If it was so important to be baptized why wasn't John baptized and receive the Holy Ghost? So was their no salvation for John and what did Christ say of John? Luke 7:28 Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist. John the Baptist was baptized but by whom? I can give you an answer but I don't think you will like were I will get the answer from.
@awolLDSasap Why did Christ say all men must be baptized? Does this not effect John? Does not Gods laws effect everyone even the Christ? If Christ would have not been baptized he would of sinned. But you still haven't answered the first questions I have asked you all. If the priesthood is not important why did Christ walk 70 miles to John why not just some person down the street and say ah baptize me it would of been much easier. The other question that has not been answered why is the
@BOON70 No, it doesn't effect John the Baptist. Many that have been saved by the sacrifice ON THE CROSS, from Adam to King David and the theif on the cross". Many were never baptized and some were even resurrected after the cross. They are now in heaven. They are not in hell. You don't know the true gospel of Christ.
@awolLDSasap If have answered all my questions answer me this one question. Why do we call it the Aaronic Priesthood and the Melchizedek Priesthood? You do profess to know more about Mormonism than Mormons do. This should be a simple question for you to answer. Since you know so much Mormonism it shouldn't even be hard for you to know where to look to find the answer. You say people were never baptized before Christ, hmm that doesn't make sense according to the scriptures John baptized many
@BOON70 Why do you call it the Aaronic and Melchz. priesthoods? Because Joseph Smith stole the names from the Jews. ARE YOU DAFT? Making up things? I never said people weren't baptized before Jesus. I said John the baptist was never baptized and Jesus never baptized anyone.
@awolLDSasap Well if you knew why they are called the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthood you wouldn't be saying he made it up. Rather than read about what some person down the street says about Mormons. You talked about the Earth being flooded but you missed one what about John 1:19-25, 2 Kings 5, and Isa. 4:4 from these scriptures it shows that baptism wasn't new to the Jews. The answer to why you can't answer simple questions about Mormon Doctrine is your not what you profess. You don't know
@BOON70 That's alot of rambling about nothing. Of course baptism wasn't new to the Jews. They had mikvahs long before John the Baptist showed up. You sure are a smart feller.
@awolLDSasap You may wonder why I ask you all these questions its because you believe you know more about Mormonism than I do. But yet I can stump you on a simple question about Mormonism. Suggestion if its a religion you don't practice or haven't practicing for more than 10 years don't act like your a professor of that religion.
@BOON70 You haven't read the comments have you? To become followers of Christ, Jews are to Have faith, be baptized and receive the Holy Ghost, "in that order". The gentiles were taught to have faith, receive the Holy Ghost and be baptized, "in that order". Mormons are NOT Jews. Joseph Smith stole the identity and priesthood of the Jews.
@BOON70 Mormons do not keep the commandments and they are not worthy to the eternal God. I have answered your questions. I cannot give you a mormon answer. That would be heresy.
@BOON70 The apostles tried to select new apostles and failed. Their work was done. They completed their mission after delivering the gospels to the churches. Sin cannot be diluted or removed by men. It is impossible for man. Jesus never taught any secrets, and Paul and Peter did not perform secret ceremonies in the Jewish temple.
@BOON70 I don't know any Christians that want to go into a temple other than just curiosity. Listen. When Satan is represented in a place that is supposed to be holy, you better run as fast as you can for the exit. Don't walk, RUN! Gentiles were allowed into the Jewish temple. There were parts for the gentiles, the Jews and the priests. You have been led to believe that the temples are holy places. They're NOT holy. They are clubs that require dues to get in just like any other club.
@awolLDSasap "Ordinances performed in the Lord's sanctuaries, though not secret, are of such a sacred nature as to be reserved for the eyes and ears and hearts of those only whose attained spiritual maturity prepares them to receive the mysteries of the kingdom. Temple ordinances, whether ancient or modern, are not published to the world; their sacred nature witnesses that they should not be bandied about by brutish persons; that which is spiritual and sacred must not be held up to
@BOON70 Utter bunk. There is nothing secret in the Gospel of Christ and it has been revealed to all in the bible. Nothing hidden and open to study by anyone.
@Noffy1111 Question odd I am asking someone on this same page the same question. Why did the apostles continue to go to the temple after the death of Christ? Question to you both the temple is sacred. As we know in the Old Testament only certain people were aloud inside the temple why?
@BOON70 As a Mormon, you have been taught that obedience to laws and ordinances of the lds gospel, you become sinless and worthy, and given a temple recommend as proof. yet. 1Jo 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. As a mormon, you must purchase worthiness and repay God for the work he did. yet, God... 2Ti 1:9 Who hath saved us, not according to our works, but according to his,,,, grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus....
@awolLDSasap a temple recommend are people that are in good standing but does say anywhere they have to perfect. There is a few things however of a serious nature that would keep you from getting a recommend though. I find it odd that you try and talk about stuff you have no idea about. Its like you trying to explain physics to me that I took 4 years in college and 2 years in high school. I enjoy science because it excites my mind and curiosity.
@BOON70 Temple recommends are club cards. Pay as you go to keep the membership. I'm not the one that is misinformed. With all of your skoolin, how can you reject facts about Josephs foibles and the history of the church? How can you read the New Testament and still believe that Jesus is Satans spirit brother and the atonement was in the Garden? I'll try to make this as simple as possible.. Jesus is patiently waiting for you.
@awolLDSasap A question I asked to you both that I have to answer because you just wish twist things to whatever you want to say. Why did Christ speak in parables? Not all of us are at the same point in our spiritual maturity. That is why Christ said, regarding his parables, that some are ready to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of heaven, but to others "it is not given" (Matt 13:11). The Bible clearly teaches that people need to be prepared for knowledge of greater truth before it is revealed
@BOON70 Again you take verse out of context. This was done as a FULFILLMENT of Prophecy. Christ being God the Everlasting Father knows whom will and will not believe. And as in the last twisting of scripture by you Christ is fulfilling prophecy through those that will never believe. Not all will believe just like you!
Now how about you prove your doctrines through accurate reliable ancient documents that are on par with the bible? We both know you can't do it and that Smith is a false profit!
@BOON70 You think lds secrets are similar to the parables? That's wishfull thinking. Mormons aren't spiritually discerned. They don't realize that God is in charge of everything and there is no spirit prison.
@awolLDSasap Anciently, the prophet Ezekiel declared, "Thus saith the Lord GOD; No stranger, uncircumcised in heart, nor uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into my sanctuary" (Ezek. 44:9)
@thatshilarious867 Is that why the garden is mentioned once or twice, and the cross is mentioned over 20 times? WRONG ATONEMENT, WRONG JESUS, WRONG SALVATION. Listen to what Isaiah said about the Son. Isa 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, THE MIGHTY GOD, THE EVERLASTING FATHER, The Prince of Peace.
Everlasting and Eternal God was never your spirit brother.
@thatshilarious867 The atonement started in the garden? Is that why He plead to the Father to remove the cup that was coming? Why not go all the way back to his birth and call that the atonement too?
@awolLDSasap before he baptized Jesus. Why was he baptizing people before Christ? Christ hadn't said Except a man be born of the .... and so on. What was the purpose of the Earth being flooded by water completely? Sounds like the Earth was baptized but what a second this was in the days of Noah? John 1:19-25 also shows that the Jews were familiar to baptism. Didn't Elisha tell Naaman to wash himself 7x in the river (2 Kings 5)? What about Isa 4:4? Baptism wasn't something new when John the
It's a miracle that Mormons use the Bible when Jr. claimed that it wasn't translated correctly..
awolLDSasap 1 month ago
I love you all, my brothers and sisters! If you really want to dig deep into the Gospel of Jesus Christ, read The Gospel Q. Before the four Gospels were written, there were The Saying of Jesus. At that time, it was Jewish custom to write down the wise sayings of Jews. They have never found a copy of this Gospel but believe it existed and confirmed when you read in several books of the New Testament where Paul preaches the Gospel. He didn't preach the Gospels. It was in Antioch that the co
Sumytid 3 months ago
This man sure seems happy (NOT!). He is so spiritually dead and it shows. His whole demeanor shows no joy.
beatleman69 4 months ago
Freemasons are NOT allowed to tell anyone thats not a freemason what goes on in their temple. I have a friend that is one and he won't tell me anything. They take a blood oath saying they will not talk about their temple cerimonies to anyone except other freemasons. The pentegram has been a satanic symbol further back than 1966. Joseph Smith was one thats why they have them on the temples in Salt Lake and Navouoo, MO. Would you enter a church with a pentegram on it? Its also used in Wicca.
beatleman69 4 months ago
@beatleman69 You probably never knew but an upright pentagram was considered a symbol of good luck originally (only inverted pentagrams were considered unlucky), and the "All-Seeing Eye" which you fools call Satanic is called the Eye of Providence, which is in fact a symbolism of the Christian God. "Satanism" was invented as a hoax in the 19th century. Then 20th century cults played along with the joke and called themselves "Satanists". The true Satanists of this world don't use symbols...
shiverleaf15 4 months ago
@beatleman69 Also, pretty much about everyone knows what goes on in Masonic lodges these days. There's nothing "hidden" anymore. Since it's been discovered that Masons actually do not do anything Satanic in their lodges, conspiracy theorists now have to forcibly adhere to the hypothesis that "only 33rd degree Freemasons are actually Luciferian" which is completely bogus. Did you go on Wikipedia yet and typed in "Taxil Hoax" yet? Please do, it'll do you some good.
shiverleaf15 4 months ago
@shiverleaf15 Watch this video, if you cannot see the satanic/masonic connection with mormonism, then you are blind. youtube.com/watch?v=lRgi0XT8Fg8 There is no conspirity theorist here, just hard evidence!
beatleman69 4 months ago
@beatleman69 When i try to load that link it just takes me straight to the Youtube main page. Anyway, i'm interested to see so-called "evidence" about Satanic influences in Mormonism or even Freemasonry for that matter. I've seen so much "evidence" and then done my own research and uncovered it all to be libel. Stop slandering Freemasons and Latter-day Saints. Like i said, all attempts to link Masons with Satan are bogus. Much of it has even been DISPROVEN as fraudulent hoaxes (e.g. Taxil Hoax).
shiverleaf15 3 months ago
He's wrong about Moses, Abraham and Noah being "prophets". This guy in the video sounds so happy, or should I say spirtually dead. He has no joy in his heart, Jesus brings joy into ones heart after receiving him as their personal saviour, this guy don't have that. A false jesus can't do that, especially when, in the mormon faith, jesus and satan are brothers, that gives satan equel rights as jesus has. Do I see freemason influences here since freemasons are luciferian.
beatleman69 6 months ago
@beatleman69 Freemasons are not Luciferian. I know where you are getting these ideas from. Conspiracy theories, yes? They got it from Albert Pike (a Freemason), supposedly. But the truth is, a man named Leo Taxil published the quote in a book "exposing" Freemasonry, claiming Pike made the quote, and then that man came out and said the entire book was a hoax to attack Freemasons and make fun of Catholics when they fell into the trap of thinking the book was real. Look it up, the Taxil Hoax.
shiverleaf15 4 months ago
@shiverleaf15 Sorry but freemasons are luciferian. For one thing they have "secrets" that they are forbiden to tell any outsider, if you have noticed yet on their temples and on freemasons cars they have a inverted pentegram, a symbol of satanism. They deny Jesus Christ as deity (God), they use the all seeing eye of Isiris, the ancient egyptian god. They refer their head of their lodges as worshipful master. Look up freemasons on youtube and/or google it, you'll find out they are luciferian.
beatleman69 4 months ago
@beatleman69 masonry is not a religion. religion is not allowed to be discussed in lodges. any man can join, so it's not that secret once a man is in. the pentagram was adopted by anton levey in 1966 with the founding of satanism as an accepted religion (with the head of baphomet inside). the pentagram has been around way longer than 1966. you have no idea what you are talking about (even though i'm sure you consider yourself an expert from all the youtube videos you've seen). get the facts.
yourelameface 4 months ago
Galations 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. II Corinthians 11:13-15 13: For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14:And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 15: Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of rightousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
beatleman69 6 months ago
His statement about their own bible another scripture? Lets see what the Bible says about that. Galations 1:6-8 6:I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel. 7:Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8:But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you that that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
beatleman69 6 months ago
A church domination cannot save you, only the blood of Christ can wash away your sins by repenting of your wicked ways and ask Jesus in your heart and life. There was a fire revival in the colonies at Joseph Smith's time, why would he question what church to belong to? Jesus didn't start a domination, he started His church with believers in Him, not in man. Smith was a freemason, thats why he claimed to see God and Jesus, sorry but there's only one God: Isaiah 43:10-11.
beatleman69 6 months ago
Please tell me where in the Bible you find the handshakes, the pagan symbols and rituals such as the Five Points through the Veil, which CAN be found in freemason/druid rituals. (google five points of fellowship). God came to bring his kingdom (see biblegateway keyword). Hebrew root word for apostole in Greek is malak, meaning messenger. The gospels speak of 12 disciples, students and the early ecclesia (assemblies) were house churches and small groups.
GmaM11 7 months ago
@GmaM11 2 Thessalonians 2:15 reminds Christians to hold fast to the traditions of God handed unto his Church. Do Protestants do that? Early Christians took part in the Endowment ceremonies and that can be proven. For example, the Washing and Anointing of the LDS is described nearly identically by Cyril of Jerusalem's 21st Catechetical Lecture. Of note is the fact that he says that only those who take part in that ceremony are worthy of being called "Christians".
shiverleaf15 3 months ago
another false apostle talking
howufigure8592 8 months ago 2
What balogna.
BurningLove17 8 months ago
@teriiura Like you said, mormons can say, "I believe The Book of Mormon to be the word of God, as far as it is translated, correctly: seeing that it has been changed, numerous times."
Ahashdah 8 months ago
I have a few questions for the Protestants lurking around here trying to convert Latter-day Saints:
1. Which Protestant sect is the correct Christian church guided by God, possessing the correct interpretation of the Bible?
2. How can you know?
3. How do you know Christianity is correct? The Old Testament alone doesn't seem to prove Christianity, just ask any Jew.
4. Having rejected the LDS concept of the Holy Spirit's promptings and testimony, how does God answer your prayers? How do you know?
shiverleaf15 9 months ago
@shiverleaf15 i will try to respond your questions briefly and if you would like to talk more about them i
would be happy to if time allows i am tired and need to sleep soon however 1 the church is not a denomination but the body of Christ the key thing that makes them true is who Jesus is and was, God in the flesh alpha and omega the creator of everything this is where the lds beliefs fall short and you do indeed follow another Christ if you are lds.
boundingraveclothes 8 months ago
@shiverleaf15 2 The Bible.. this is the word of God and the manual for life this is 66 books written by 40 guys written in 3 languages over 1500 of years. Paul wrote 2 ti 3:16 all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for Doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. doctrine
(whats right) reproof (what not right) and lastly how to get it right.
so the whole council of God is how we can know.
boundingraveclothes 8 months ago
@shiverleaf15 3 i would disagree with you that the old testiment does confirm the new there are hundreds of prophesies literally fulfilled by Jesus Christ i will give you references for a few Gen. 12:1-3, 22:18,
Gen 49:10, 2 Samuel 7:12, Micah 5:2, Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah 35:5-6, Psalm 118:22, Daniel 9:24-26,
Psalm 22:16-18, Isaiah 53; Zech 12:10, Psalm 16:10. Paul also explains why the jews would disagree in romans 11:25
boundingraveclothes 8 months ago
@shiverleaf15 4 God answers prayers in a variety of ways especially in regard to learning his word somtime you will over hear something a lot of times conveniently you will find the answer in the word somtimes audibly God is not confined to answering prayer by one given means danial went on a 21 day fast waiting for a answer to his prayer, but know with surety that he does answer prayer i personally try to thank him for the ones he doesn't answer, man proposes God disposes
boundingraveclothes 8 months ago
@shiverleaf15 he knows whats best for me so i strive to give my sovernty to him. hope this helps you
boundingraveclothes 8 months ago
Jesus is the ONLY Truth! Here is what we call false Teaching because If you believe the Bible, it is impossible to believe Mormonism period. The New Tastement contradicts with mormon doctrines, like the Bible teaches that there is no marriage in heaven, the Temple of God is in the hearts of Believers, Jesus is the Only High Priest, Salvation is by Grace alone and not of works. There are many more but those are the main Ones. Anyway, they do'nt believe in One God but billions of them somewhere.
a3zfasi 9 months ago
@a3zfasi If you believe in the Old Testament, a Jew would tell you it's impossible to believe in the New Testament because Judaism heavily contradicts with Christian doctrines. Do you see the flaw of your logic?
shiverleaf15 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you believe that you are Mormon and follow Christ, then you have been misinformed and/or manipulated. I have submitted my life to Christ. You need to know that you are making a choice between a church of the utmost deceit and Jesus Christ. I love you and I pray for you all. Please read your Bible. Mathew, Mark, Romans, Corinthians,Galatians it doesn't matter, just read the New Testament and make a choice between His Promise and your church's. Galatians 1:6-9. This is haunting for u
MVhowell87 9 months ago
Anti-Mormons = Masters of Ignorance
smoraffah 9 months ago
hahahahhahahaha LIARS!! mormons only believe in the bible as long as "it's translated correctly" meaning that if everyone outside mormonism shows the mormons that the bible doesnt talk about the book of mormon, the mormons will NOT believe/trust the bible! and i have news for you mormons... the bible never.... NEVER talks about the book of mormon!! this nonsense is the same as imagining in gold plates! it's simply not there! stop making stuff up mormons!!
MORMONS = MASTERS OF EXCUSES
MALDITTOROKKERO 10 months ago
@MALDITTOROKKERO or you can say:i believe in the book of mormon as long as it is translated correctly ,knowing that it has been changed numerous time
teriiura 9 months ago
@MALDITTOROKKERO Again, just like i told the other fellow here; a Jew could apply this same flawed logic of yours to Christianity overall, and say that Jesus misapplied Jewish prophecies to himself, and that Christianity is heavily disproved by the Old Testament, and that Jesus was a "master of excuses", etc. So why are you a Christian, if the logic you use against Mormonism would disprove your own religion too according to Judaism? I think that's a bit hypocritical of you.
shiverleaf15 9 months ago
"Even Mormon apologists have to admit that many of the variants are only minor in nature. Dr. Anderson, a Mormon scholar and authority in the LDS Church on biblical manuscripts, also recognises that the variations in the New Testament manuscripts are essentially insignificant. Anderson notes the overwhelming agreement between the thousands of manuscripts; he explains that '...all manuscripts agree on the essential correctness of 99% of the verses in the New Testament...
Shulamitefire 11 months ago
(cont'd) R.L. Anderson, Fourteenth Annual Symposium of the Archaeology of the Scriptures, Brigham Young University, 1963, 52-59
Shulamitefire 11 months ago
they have a half ass belife in the Bible.
jayhawk88z 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
“But even if we or an angel from heaven (moroni) should preach to you a gospel other than what we have preached to you, curse be on him!” Galatians 1:6-9 Mormon’s are not prepared for the coming apocalypse, Huge Sorrow will be to the mormon who refuse to see the truth, You have been warned your fall will be great. Read the BIBLE ONLY!
imationqwest 1 year ago 10
The church of Joseph Smith of latter day saints.
wachnathan 1 year ago
@wachnathan Joseph Smith--isn't it about time?
moparmonster1965 1 year ago
Rom 10:3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to (establish their own righteousness), have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. 2Cr 11:13 For such [are] false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 15 Therefore [it is] no great thing if his, ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. (the 3rd article of faith and Sec.132 D&C is evidence)
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
the book of mormon and the bible do not go hand in hand...the mormons believe they were once in heaven created by heavenly father and a heavenly mother. imagine how much sex is going on in heaven...MY GOD WAS NEVER A CREATED BEING, . MY GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH AS WELL AS THE PLAN FOR SALVATION. mormons don t believe that, they believe they can enter heaven on their own merit. now that is nothing to sneeze at, they believe that they are better than God so the attitude shows
MrBigbear6718 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrBigbear6718 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrBigbear6718 1 year ago
are you kidding me... I know beyond this earth that you mormons believe that the bible is only as correct as your prophets interpret. Was in not joe who stated "the bible is not really correct but the book of mormon is more correct" I beg to differ since I know the book of mormon has more than 2000 grammatical changes and puts Jesus born in Jerusalem. I would rather believe the bible than just a book. The BIBLE is inspired GOD BREATHED, the book of mormon on the other hand is just fiction
MrBigbear6718 1 year ago
@MrBigbear6718 Hey the Bible somewhere also says that Jesus would be born in Jerusalem in the Old Testament. The word "Jerusalem" was not restricted to the city, but also to its close environs, including the town of Bethlehem. The so-called 2000 grammatical changes are just that, grammar. The KJV has changed words, such as adding in unicorns and dragons where the original text said "re'em" and jackals respectively. I don't judge the Bible for its grammatical changes, do you?
shiverleaf15 6 months ago
@shiverleaf15 you are wrong. completely wrong. jerusalem was a walled city; this means everything inside the walls was jerusalem. everything else isn't. go read micah 5:2-5, matthew 2:1, or luke 1:4-6 then go read alma 7:10. the fact that we have the dead sea scrolls, tanakh, torah, talmud, targums, and vulgate (over 26,000 manuscripts in all that comprise the cannon of biblical text) for us to refer to is all the proof you need.
yourelameface 4 months ago
@yourelameface Luke 2:4 calls Jerusalem the city of David. 2 Kings 14:20 and 1 Chronicles 11:5 call Jerusalem the city of David. Several Bible scholars and Christians consider the town of Bethlehem to be sort of like a "suburb" of Jerusalem. The BoM says Jesus was born in the land of Jerusalem, not in the city.
shiverleaf15 4 months ago
@shiverleaf15 nope. "and behold, he shall be born of mary at jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers..." never in the entire bible is this city referred to as a land. the city of david reference is in regards to both the birth place of david (bethlehem) while the other was conquered by david (city of jebus). within the 1 chronicles passage the cities are set apart. v5 points out david was at the stronghold (jerusalem) while v16 says the philistines were at bethlehem. there is distinction.
yourelameface 4 months ago
@shiverleaf15 matthew states bethlehem is in "the land of judah (matt 2:6, cf. luke 2:4). judah is the "land;" jerusalem is a "city" (zach 2:6, matt 5:35), and so is bethlehem (luke 2:4). twice matthew refers to "land of israel" (2:20-21) and the to the "city of nazareth" (v23). there isn't a single lexical source that defines the term "city" to mean a "land." biblical writers didn't have suburbs, they had walls that defined cities. they also didn't confuse "land" and "city."
yourelameface 4 months ago
FHE fun: The more FHE blogs I find, the more I rejoice, it's so nice to have so many great FHE online lesson plans! And the ones posted on each Monday at LDS Family Night Fun are no exception. Find themes, scriptures, activities, lessons, and refreshment ideas all pulled together in a fabulous and easily accessible organization.
omiolo 1 year ago
Disneyland guide: Thinking about taking a trip to Disneyland this summer? Don't go without checking The Disneyland Guide for LDS Families, a blog that "began its life as a manuscript for a book that was never published, so there is a ton of content here." Find places to stay, transportation tips, ways to best navigate the park, and much more.
omiolo 1 year ago
the book of mormon and the bible go hand and hand together
janoodle12 1 year ago
if it is holy then leave the book of mormon. throw it in the garbage
MrBigbear6718 1 year ago
@MrBigbear6718 huh?
omiolo 1 year ago
Ballard, you are a dried-up weed who subscribes to the "fake it til you make it" philosophy. After all, this was what you learned to do, in the '50s, when that was such a common thing to believe.
Don't have a testimony of the Gospel? Bear it, until to get one! (viz, Fake it, until you Make it)
Don't have the associated "Gifts" of your calling, yet? Well, Ballard, just FAKE IT UNTIL YOU MAKE IT.
In short, just keep on pretending: that way nobody will know, for sure!
orlovna2 1 year ago
2:05....."write the inspired things that they heard and spoke".
YEAH! SO??
Melvin (Russell) Ballard: you are a tired old goat, giving out a re-hash of things that are in the Bible, already.
Do you prophesy, Ballard?
Do you "reveal" anything new? (besides "no multiple piercings, for little girls & women"??)
Do you See anything, as a Seer?
Anciently, a prophet who did not prophesy was no prophet
A Seer who did not "See" was no Seer
A Revelator who did not reveal was no revelator.
orlovna2 1 year ago
To: Elder Ballard
Well....the acoustics make your voice "boom right out there", fo' shizzle.
But, Melvin...Russell...Ballard....you are nothing like the Savior who you tell Mormons to be like! In your media interview (where you take along Quentin Cook, a "junior" apostle), you say that you want to be perceived in a certain way.
BEHOLD, Christ going around saying to the people: "please perceive me in a certain way. Okay?"
You sound awfully, awfully needy, Mr. Elder Melvin Russ Ballard.
orlovna2 1 year ago
Friberg published an explanation of his works in the December 1952 issue of the Children’s Friend, with four illustrations following in the January through April 1953 issues. Another four paintings appeared in the first four months of 1954, but the final four were published intermittently from 1961 through 1963.
omiolo 1 year ago
Eight of the illustrations were first published in a softcover edition of the Book of Mormon itself in 1961. Subsequent paperbound editions of the scripture still contain several of the Friberg compositions.
omiolo 1 year ago
Here we are again, another "apostle" suppressing the truth in unrighteousness.
Time spent in the BoM would be much better spent in the 66 Books of the Bible. BoM is a watered down "bible" with enormous credibility issues as to historicity. It is blatantly racist. It is a bait book, a book to bastardize Bible belief, & lead to D&C & PoGP, where by far most of Mormon doctrine that separates the LDS church from Christianity is written.
Shulamitefire 1 year ago
You bring up the book of Enoch and yes it is quoted in the bible and yet, it is not in the codex. If God wanted it in there it would be in there now wouldn't it?
There are other manuscripts or books that don't make the bible but at least we know of them and can read and touch them.
What does the book of mormon offer? NOTHING.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
Boon there are no more temples. There is only one place a temple can be built and that is on Mount Moriah and no where else.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 So Noffy when you going to answer that question I asked you? A Biblical case in point is what occurred on the Mount of Transfiguration (Matt. 17:1-9). There, God the Father's voice was heard testifying that Jesus was His Beloved Son. Moses and Elias also appeared to the three apostles and Jesus on that occasion. Later, Christ admonished Peter, James and John to "tell the vision to no man, until the Son of Man be risen again from the dead" (Matt. 17:9). Clearly he was telling
BOON70 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 What evidence do you have of the only temple is to be built on Mount Moriah? I didn't see you quote any scriptures? Sounds like hear say to me.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 How about this verses Deut 12:13-14,,,, Deut 12:8-11
Noffy1111 1 year ago
This post is for all you mormons that want to know the truth. The council of Nicaea did do some things like confirm what the early church had as its bible and yes they did confirm the trinity. But understand this clearly.
The catholic church was started under Constantine of Rome. You must understand that the catholic church is just a big of cult as the mormon church is with pagan rituals and rites.
The trinity is clearly taught and was taught from the very beginning.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 Find somewhere some Christian that believed in the Trinity before 300 AD. I told you I had already answered the question you can't find one. Although I can reference you early Christians that believed they were 3 separate individuals.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 You see this is where you go off the tracks. If they believe in three separate gods and not one God with three personages then they are not Christian.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 That's incorrect, and i'd suggest you compare several parts of Tertullian's Against Praxeas with Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho. Because the truth is, the Trinity is a teaching of the Montanists, not the original Christians. I could show you what i mean if you're interested. Most Trinitarians have sadly never even heard of the word "Montanism".
This post is for all you Trinitarians who want to know the truth.
shiverleaf15 6 months ago
You may think well you tripped up you said you can. That might be because some of the books I can give reference too. You can find at your local library and you can read it for yourself.
BOON70 1 year ago
Looks to me like you contradict yourself again. What is the definition of are? pres. indic. pl. and 2nd pers. sing. of be. dictionary com. What is the definition of the be they are talking about. –verb (used without object)1. to exist or live: Shakespeare's “To be or not to be” is the ultimate question. 2. to take place; happen; occur: The wedding was last week. 3.to occupy a place or position: The book is on the table. 4.to continue or remain as before: Let things be.
BOON70 1 year ago
Are Jesus and satan spiritual brothers? Yes or no and why?
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 5.
to belong; attend; befall: May good fortune be with you. 6 (used as a copula to connect the subject with its predicate adjective, or predicate nominative, in order to describe, identify, or amplify the subject): Martha is tall. John is president. This is she. 7 (used as a copula to introduce or form interrogative or imperative sentences): Is that right? Be quiet! Don't be facetious. –auxiliary verb
BOON70 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 About you saying it didn't begin at Nicaea in 325 AD find me somewhere a reference that talks of the Trinity you can't use the Bible for this either. Find somewhere some early Christian that the doctrine of the Trinity is true before 300 AD. I will help you out on this one you can't. But about what I told you about you can and I can give reference. The Trinity is made up.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 NOT USE THE BIBLE. How ignorant can you really be. The bible is the sole source of authority and I will use it above any and all other sources.
The trinity was well known long before the Nicaea council ever met. What you are either ignorant in or deceptive in is this.
The council of Nicaea was not ever be the deciding factor in what is church or what is not church. The early church had the apostolic writings and had their bible long before the council of Nicaea.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
In light of the scriptures I have given it is very clear God is a trinity. Also my book has established itself as accurate reliable History with people witnessing these events and recording them.
Of the two Books I will be trusting the Holy Word of God and not your your book of satan.
You have been told the truth and if you reject Christ as 'THE' God as the EVERLASTING FATHER, then you are not CHRISTIAN.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 Agamemnon to the wars is gone. dictionary com According to the all definitions of I and my Father "are" one. Doesn't fit. It would have to be is one. No where do they say is one they only say are one. As to say work as one. Again I ask the question, why is Christ called the Father? But about answering the spirit brothers question. Do you remember me asking about the other books of the Bible that are not included in the Bible when are going to answer that question?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 I did answer that questions already. Their are no other books of the bible. What is there is there. The people long before the Nicaea had their book. It was based on apostolic authority. It may have bot been been in book form yet but they had it.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 That is because you decided to answer the question now wither their is books added or not when you see no references for the such. Matt 2:23 .. spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene. Where else does it say Christ will be a Nazarene? Jude 1:14 Enoch also . . . prophesied of these. Enoch is barely mentioned and there are no prophesies so where are they? Don't forget the other books too Josh. 10: 13, 2 Chr. 9:29, 2 Chr. 12:15, and 2 Chr 20:34.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 God keeps His word and if Enoch was meant to be in the bible it would be. It is just as simple as that.
There are many mentions of books in the bible but that does not make them a part of the bible. So what is your point?
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 So what your saying is what they are quoting isn't scripture because it is from somewhere else other than the Bible? So if they found the Book of Nathan the prophet even though its mentioned in the Bible it wouldn't be part of the word of God? Question was Nathan a prophet? So if Nathan wrote wouldn't that mean it is the word of God? Question do know how the King James Bible was put together take note its the most widely used as well.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 There are extra biblical sources this I do not argue. Yes I know how the KJV came about.
I happen to own the book of ENOCH and yes Jude does quote it but it is still not in the bible.
There is only one Holy Bible and it is God breathed besides it there are no other bibles.
The KJV bible is no longer the most widely used any longer. That distinction now belongs to the NIV and it is a corrupted text. It's founding is in the Alexandrian text and not Textus Receptus.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 The book of Enoch is found in the Dead Sea Scrolls as well as Wikipedia agrees with this. But about other books it says in John 3:16 For God so loved the world... So God loves the world? So why didn't he have his word into all people of the Earth? God supposedly loves everyone on Earth. So why didn't he have his word to everyone on Earth at all times when they were willing to receive it? If not so God doesn't love the world.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 That is assanine. God is in charge, not you and your priesthood authority. His will is done, not yours.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap The priesthood existed with Moses who was in charge? If you knew anything about Mormonism you would know that is covered in D&C 121
BOON70 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 Also about the Book of Enoch being mentioned in the Bible why would Jude quote from something that is not a divine source or of God? Question why would they quote from any of the books I mentioned unless they were of divine value? Question was Nathan chosen by God to be a prophet, what about Enoch, and what about the others that I mentioned? If you know how the King James Bible came about enlighten me.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Tell me if these have been translated correctly. Rev 19:13 And he [was] clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. Rev 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. Rev 21:14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Hmm I find it odd you don't answer the question I gave to notify. I can answer your question, but you answer me first because I asked first. Oh and just to let you know your questions is very easy to answer.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 This is going in circles. The only thing that is important is Jesus. Isaiah said that he is the Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace. The priesthood, laws, ordinances, temples reject the sacrifice on the cross.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap How does the temple reject what Christ did? Does not the work the apostles did after the resurrection of Christ show that the work of God was not yet finished? What about people who go and repent does this not show the work of God has not ceased? Those who go about and preach the word of God does this not show that the work of God has not ceased? If so they do the work of God in vain. But yet we see that Paul, Peter, others continue to go to the temple after Christ?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Temple endowments add to the work that Jesus did. Jhn 10:1 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber. Jhn 10:7 Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep. There are no secrets to pass through the heavenly veil. Jesus is the only way to live with the Father.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap John 10:1, 7 says nothing against endowments or the temple. What I find odd is many people say after Christ there was to be no more temples but yet the apostles continue to go to them after the death of Christ. Question what was the purpose of temples after Christ?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 John doesn't say anything against endowments? That's because there never were any. Why did the apostles go to the temple afterwards? To teach the people. After the cross, there was no need for a temple. Remember, a "new temple built without hands"? The aposltes never performed secret ceremonies anywhere in the Jewish temple. You are deluded.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Sometimes I wonder if you guys read the scriptures because you take things so out of context or only tell part of the story only the part you like. Temple without hands? You forgot to quote one verse John 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body, he wasn't talking about the temple in Jerusalem. 1 Cor 6:9 it says our bodies are a temple of which the Holy Ghost can be if we are righteous. Next you don't know anything about temple recommends. No one is perfect those who are given
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 I know the temple walk, and I have a secret name. Want to know it? The spirit of God is among the people of God, not the experts, the ordained, apostles or prophet. Those with faith in the eternal God are "the bride of Christ, the temple built without hands". Each individual is part of the temple and the faithfull together make up the holy temple.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Sermon on the Mount to pray and fast in secret, promising that "thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly" (Matt. 6:18). In John 7:10 we have Christ going somewhere in secret, not openly. He made a clandestine journey from Galilee to Jerusalem to attend the feast of tabernacles. John's account tells us that "when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret."
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Are you kiddinG? You find Jesus sneaking around so he wouldn't be noticed and you think lds ceremonies and temple secrets came from this? INSANE. Jesus said that he NEVER taught any secrets..
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap mockery or be made the object of raillery by carnal men. We can, however, speak in general terms of what is done in temples; we can name the ordinances and tell their purpose and intent; and we can quote from the scriptures such passages as speak in guarded and reserved terms of those things which are reserved for the faithful only." ( The Mortal Messiah, Vol.1, p.104 - p.105, Bruce R. McConkie)
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 You quote only air if you quote anything but the bible. The entire book of mormon is a fraud and has been proven so. If you do not leave this cult fast you will be left behind.
I want you to prove your doctrines with accurate reliable documents that are historically accurate.
Can you do this?
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 I quote the Bible and its teaching and you ignore them. Like I said before you only go over what you want. Question why is there no mention of what I talked about over Matt 17, Heb 5, Matt 7 just like I said you only go over what you like. You only went over one of the many scriptures I brought up like I said I can quote you where you try and twist things to bend to your own views. Its not hard either because you do it in practically every post. Again why didn't you answer my question
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Wanna hear Packers parable? Jesus must be paid back for his sacrifice because he's the debt collector for the father. You need to stop believing these guys. Gods grace cannot be purchased by any means.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@awolLDSasap Powerfully true comment brother. Thank you!
"Wanna hear Packers parable? Jesus must be paid back for his sacrifice because he's the debt collector for the father. You need to stop believing these guys. Gods grace cannot be purchased by any means."
Shulamitefire 1 year ago
Comment removed
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@Shulamitefire He starts the clip off saying the Bible is a miracle. What he should have said it's a miracle I'm holding this up in conference and only doing it to show people we believe in some parts of the Bible.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Yes, as when there is a conflict between the Bible & other writings, even in regard to main & plain Holy Spirit admonition & teaching, such as the ontology of God & man & soteriology, the Bible is tossed. This error & contempt for the Bible is certainly one major mark of every cult. Mormons have exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like unto Mormon man. They have exchanged the truth of the One Beautiful God, worshiping & serving creation vs the Creator.
Shulamitefire 1 year ago
@Shulamitefire Well spoken.. Mormons completely fail to realize the wicked are not word of wisdom breakers, "that they dearly hold onto as a means of worthiness" but those who alter and redefine His Word.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Depends on why you mean by redefining his word. Question who wrote out the scriptures and taught them to the people before and after Christ? What were they called? Without the priesthood no man has the authority from God no man has the authority to preach the Gospel. Not only this men receive degrees at big colleges so they can preach and this is how they get their authority but what does it say in the scriptures? Heb 5:4 No man taketh this honor unto himself, but he that is called
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 You have completely failed. There was no priesthood authority with the apostles. Jesus was the authority. His spirit was left with the aposltes to help them remember what he had taught them and NO ONE changed the New Testament. Why do you need names of authority to separate you from the Spirit of God?
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap When you come to answer that you can not answer you don't think about it for a while or even say I will have to do some research on that. You just try to change the subject. How would you feel if I ignored your questions?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 The lds line of authority is not real. You don't need priesthood authority to baptize someone.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Then why did Christ have to set ppl out to baptize ppl? He also called them Elders. John the Baptist had to have been baptized by someone. I say you would know the scripture about Baptism being a essential for baptism. If so how was it done and how did John receive his authority. This also presents another question why did Jesus have to be baptized by John? If authority isn't important Christ could be baptized by some guy down the street. Why go through all the effort of being
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 John was called by God alone. He wasn't baptized by someone in authority. He wasn't baptized at all. To be baptized, "you put on Christ" to become a follower of Jesus. Mormon doctrine has clouded your mind.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap of God even as Aaron. How did Aaron receive the priesthood? This much I do not he didn't go to some school to receive a piece of paper that said he received it.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 The Melch. and Aaronic priesthood names were stolen from the Bible. lds priesthood power is fake. YOU HAVE NO POWER or authority over anyone.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap If the apostles didn't have authority they would not be able to baptize. Gal. 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. I asked you why they have the names because supposedly you know more about than I do, but if you go to about any Mormon they can answer this question. You also act as if you know more about my religion than I do. These are simple questions, but yet can't answer them.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Answering all of your questions. That's correct. Baptism shows that you are a follower of Christ, "put on Christ". You don't need anyone in authority to baptize. NO ONE baptized John the Baptist. Joseph and Sidney invented the lineage of authority. Your authority is not real. Don't keep asking the same questions.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap baptized by John?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 I said no one baptized John the baptist. John was the Elijah figure who is the same as Elias.Luk 1:17 And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord. John the baptist was chosen by God, "never baptized" to be the precursor to the Lord.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Where does it say John the Baptist wasn't baptized? So this is an assumption you make otherwise hearsay. But what we do read that Christ was baptized. Why was Christ baptized? Of all people he didn't have to put on Christ because he was the Christ. So why then why was he baptized?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 John was chosen by God to make way for Jesus. Show me where the Bible says someone baptized John.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Just as I said before just because it doesn't say it doesn't mean that it didn't happen. John also received his authority to baptize from God. We also keep in mind why did Christ choose John? If authority wasn't important Christ would of been baptized by someone else because it would of been so much easier. Christ had to walk 70 miles to be baptized by John.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Jesus knew everything because He is God. Also, John the baptist was His cousin.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Thats nice to know but you didn't answer my question. Why did Christ choose John? Why not someone near by. It took Christ walking 70 miles to get to John.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 He chose John because He is God. God chose John. When He was baptized by John, Jesus was showing the JEWS what they must do. Have faith, be baptized and received the Holy Ghost, "in that order". The gentiles were taught to have faith, receive the Holy Ghost and be baptized, "in that order".
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Quoting awo "He chose John because He is God" If it was so important to be baptized why wasn't John baptized and receive the Holy Ghost? So was their no salvation for John and what did Christ say of John? Luke 7:28 Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist. John the Baptist was baptized but by whom? I can give you an answer but I don't think you will like were I will get the answer from.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Who controls the universe? If He chose John, why would he need to be baptized? To fulfill Joseph smiths doctrine? You don't know who God is.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Why did Christ say all men must be baptized? Does this not effect John? Does not Gods laws effect everyone even the Christ? If Christ would have not been baptized he would of sinned. But you still haven't answered the first questions I have asked you all. If the priesthood is not important why did Christ walk 70 miles to John why not just some person down the street and say ah baptize me it would of been much easier. The other question that has not been answered why is the
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 No, it doesn't effect John the Baptist. Many that have been saved by the sacrifice ON THE CROSS, from Adam to King David and the theif on the cross". Many were never baptized and some were even resurrected after the cross. They are now in heaven. They are not in hell. You don't know the true gospel of Christ.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap If have answered all my questions answer me this one question. Why do we call it the Aaronic Priesthood and the Melchizedek Priesthood? You do profess to know more about Mormonism than Mormons do. This should be a simple question for you to answer. Since you know so much Mormonism it shouldn't even be hard for you to know where to look to find the answer. You say people were never baptized before Christ, hmm that doesn't make sense according to the scriptures John baptized many
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Why do you call it the Aaronic and Melchz. priesthoods? Because Joseph Smith stole the names from the Jews. ARE YOU DAFT? Making up things? I never said people weren't baptized before Jesus. I said John the baptist was never baptized and Jesus never baptized anyone.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Well if you knew why they are called the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthood you wouldn't be saying he made it up. Rather than read about what some person down the street says about Mormons. You talked about the Earth being flooded but you missed one what about John 1:19-25, 2 Kings 5, and Isa. 4:4 from these scriptures it shows that baptism wasn't new to the Jews. The answer to why you can't answer simple questions about Mormon Doctrine is your not what you profess. You don't know
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 That's alot of rambling about nothing. Of course baptism wasn't new to the Jews. They had mikvahs long before John the Baptist showed up. You sure are a smart feller.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@BOON70 I didn't say Joseph made up the priesthoood. I said he stole it from the Jews.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap You may wonder why I ask you all these questions its because you believe you know more about Mormonism than I do. But yet I can stump you on a simple question about Mormonism. Suggestion if its a religion you don't practice or haven't practicing for more than 10 years don't act like your a professor of that religion.
BOON70 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BOON70 You haven't read the comments have you? To become followers of Christ, Jews are to Have faith, be baptized and receive the Holy Ghost, "in that order". The gentiles were taught to have faith, receive the Holy Ghost and be baptized, "in that order". Mormons are NOT Jews. Joseph Smith stole the identity and priesthood of the Jews.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@BOON70 Mormons do not keep the commandments and they are not worthy to the eternal God. I have answered your questions. I cannot give you a mormon answer. That would be heresy.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BOON70 Don't profess that you understand and know the gospel of Jesus Christ.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap priesthood called Aaronic and Melchizedek?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 The apostles tried to select new apostles and failed. Their work was done. They completed their mission after delivering the gospels to the churches. Sin cannot be diluted or removed by men. It is impossible for man. Jesus never taught any secrets, and Paul and Peter did not perform secret ceremonies in the Jewish temple.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap According to the whole Christian world we should just let anyone in the temple. Why didn't they do that in days of old?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 I don't know any Christians that want to go into a temple other than just curiosity. Listen. When Satan is represented in a place that is supposed to be holy, you better run as fast as you can for the exit. Don't walk, RUN! Gentiles were allowed into the Jewish temple. There were parts for the gentiles, the Jews and the priests. You have been led to believe that the temples are holy places. They're NOT holy. They are clubs that require dues to get in just like any other club.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap "Ordinances performed in the Lord's sanctuaries, though not secret, are of such a sacred nature as to be reserved for the eyes and ears and hearts of those only whose attained spiritual maturity prepares them to receive the mysteries of the kingdom. Temple ordinances, whether ancient or modern, are not published to the world; their sacred nature witnesses that they should not be bandied about by brutish persons; that which is spiritual and sacred must not be held up to
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Utter bunk. There is nothing secret in the Gospel of Christ and it has been revealed to all in the bible. Nothing hidden and open to study by anyone.
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@BOON70 copy and paste from lds dot org? You're diggin a hole..
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@BOON70 (How does the temple reject what Christ did) They reject it as the work that 'THE' God did.
Are satan and Jesus spirit brothers yes or no?
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 Question odd I am asking someone on this same page the same question. Why did the apostles continue to go to the temple after the death of Christ? Question to you both the temple is sacred. As we know in the Old Testament only certain people were aloud inside the temple why?
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 As a Mormon, you have been taught that obedience to laws and ordinances of the lds gospel, you become sinless and worthy, and given a temple recommend as proof. yet. 1Jo 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. As a mormon, you must purchase worthiness and repay God for the work he did. yet, God... 2Ti 1:9 Who hath saved us, not according to our works, but according to his,,,, grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus....
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap a temple recommend are people that are in good standing but does say anywhere they have to perfect. There is a few things however of a serious nature that would keep you from getting a recommend though. I find it odd that you try and talk about stuff you have no idea about. Its like you trying to explain physics to me that I took 4 years in college and 2 years in high school. I enjoy science because it excites my mind and curiosity.
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Temple recommends are club cards. Pay as you go to keep the membership. I'm not the one that is misinformed. With all of your skoolin, how can you reject facts about Josephs foibles and the history of the church? How can you read the New Testament and still believe that Jesus is Satans spirit brother and the atonement was in the Garden? I'll try to make this as simple as possible.. Jesus is patiently waiting for you.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap A question I asked to you both that I have to answer because you just wish twist things to whatever you want to say. Why did Christ speak in parables? Not all of us are at the same point in our spiritual maturity. That is why Christ said, regarding his parables, that some are ready to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of heaven, but to others "it is not given" (Matt 13:11). The Bible clearly teaches that people need to be prepared for knowledge of greater truth before it is revealed
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 Again you take verse out of context. This was done as a FULFILLMENT of Prophecy. Christ being God the Everlasting Father knows whom will and will not believe. And as in the last twisting of scripture by you Christ is fulfilling prophecy through those that will never believe. Not all will believe just like you!
Now how about you prove your doctrines through accurate reliable ancient documents that are on par with the bible? We both know you can't do it and that Smith is a false profit!
Noffy1111 1 year ago
@Noffy1111 prophet*
thatshilarious867 1 year ago
@BOON70 You think lds secrets are similar to the parables? That's wishfull thinking. Mormons aren't spiritually discerned. They don't realize that God is in charge of everything and there is no spirit prison.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Do you believe in an afterlife?
thatshilarious867 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Anciently, the prophet Ezekiel declared, "Thus saith the Lord GOD; No stranger, uncircumcised in heart, nor uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into my sanctuary" (Ezek. 44:9)
BOON70 1 year ago
@BOON70 So what. Some mormons haven't been circumcized. Are you keeping them out of your temples? I don't think so..
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap Well, actually, the Atonement was in the garden of Gethsemane and on the cross. It took place in two parts, if you will.
thatshilarious867 1 year ago
@thatshilarious867 Is that why the garden is mentioned once or twice, and the cross is mentioned over 20 times? WRONG ATONEMENT, WRONG JESUS, WRONG SALVATION. Listen to what Isaiah said about the Son. Isa 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, THE MIGHTY GOD, THE EVERLASTING FATHER, The Prince of Peace.
Everlasting and Eternal God was never your spirit brother.
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@thatshilarious867 The atonement started in the garden? Is that why He plead to the Father to remove the cup that was coming? Why not go all the way back to his birth and call that the atonement too?
Jesus was never your spirit brother
awolLDSasap 1 year ago
@awolLDSasap before he baptized Jesus. Why was he baptizing people before Christ? Christ hadn't said Except a man be born of the .... and so on. What was the purpose of the Earth being flooded by water completely? Sounds like the Earth was baptized but what a second this was in the days of Noah? John 1:19-25 also shows that the Jews were familiar to baptism. Didn't Elisha tell Naaman to wash himself 7x in the river (2 Kings 5)? What about Isa 4:4? Baptism wasn't something new when John the
BOON70 1 year ago