Think about how magnetic fields are amplified by applying more power with a core around a crystalline structure such as iron. I have stated already the speed doesn't actually change in relative to the electron but it appears to due to the gravity of the nucleus slowing time. (GEMM 18) Imagine the electron's force of movement(wave) being amplified by the gravity of the nucleus, there is your whip crack.
Wave, how is it propagated? On earth, in rock, sand, water, air, molecular structure, atomic structure.... In space, if true void, then no medium for propagation, thus thrusters
would not work, have to have a resisting medium. Equal and Opposite does not apply in nothingness, in nothingness, I am not!
First, Newton: even in a true vacuum, equal and opposite works. GEMM actually fills in the voids and says there is no true vacuum. Actually makes space travel theory easier.
The wave propagation I explain in another video elsewhere--I'll try to look it up.
That "big bang" comment hit me on the chin like a Mike Tyson upper-cut. You dismantled Special Relativity with your Gemm Theory, so naturally I thought you would have tossed the "big bang" out the window. Any data or idea for Gemm theory supporting this? I was inclined to think of a perpetual-motion type universe with your Gemm Theory, but it's your theory, not mine.
Gemm Theory has no problem with the formulation of the Big Bang, only that the planks would have started out at the same time and been some of the fundamental particles forming other particles at a time even closer to zero than is currently described. I haven't seen a big bang theory that accounts for dark matter, but Gemm in a big bang theory would.
Thank you for the response and continue the nice work here. Was not dark matter hypothesized as a life-support system to keep the big-bang hypothesis from reaching the null?
No, not the same. The electron (spoken of as a particle) is about 10-15 or -16, while the plank is about 10-31. The electron can be seen as a wave (and remember that all matter (including you) can be characterized by your 'mass energy' as a wave. But as we will see in the next electricity lecture, the overlap of plank, electron, plank waves will propogate an 'electric current' (which is not the same as electric flux).
Think about how magnetic fields are amplified by applying more power with a core around a crystalline structure such as iron. I have stated already the speed doesn't actually change in relative to the electron but it appears to due to the gravity of the nucleus slowing time. (GEMM 18) Imagine the electron's force of movement(wave) being amplified by the gravity of the nucleus, there is your whip crack.
gtarrant2 4 years ago
Wave, how is it propagated? On earth, in rock, sand, water, air, molecular structure, atomic structure.... In space, if true void, then no medium for propagation, thus thrusters
would not work, have to have a resisting medium. Equal and Opposite does not apply in nothingness, in nothingness, I am not!
conchokid1946 4 years ago
First, Newton: even in a true vacuum, equal and opposite works. GEMM actually fills in the voids and says there is no true vacuum. Actually makes space travel theory easier.
The wave propagation I explain in another video elsewhere--I'll try to look it up.
Thanks!
aeinstein1904 4 years ago
That "big bang" comment hit me on the chin like a Mike Tyson upper-cut. You dismantled Special Relativity with your Gemm Theory, so naturally I thought you would have tossed the "big bang" out the window. Any data or idea for Gemm theory supporting this? I was inclined to think of a perpetual-motion type universe with your Gemm Theory, but it's your theory, not mine.
theoshow2 4 years ago
Gemm Theory has no problem with the formulation of the Big Bang, only that the planks would have started out at the same time and been some of the fundamental particles forming other particles at a time even closer to zero than is currently described. I haven't seen a big bang theory that accounts for dark matter, but Gemm in a big bang theory would.
aeinstein1904 4 years ago
Thank you for the response and continue the nice work here. Was not dark matter hypothesized as a life-support system to keep the big-bang hypothesis from reaching the null?
theoshow2 4 years ago
No, really it was to explain why galaxies are slowing down. See Wikipaedia on their 'dark energy' article.
aeinstein1904 4 years ago
the wave cracks and creates a wave
what's the first wave if you don't think of it as a particle then
teooo 5 years ago
I mean it creates a wave in the gemm but is the electron described with a wave function also a wave in the gemm? How are they differentiated then`?
teooo 5 years ago
No, not the same. The electron (spoken of as a particle) is about 10-15 or -16, while the plank is about 10-31. The electron can be seen as a wave (and remember that all matter (including you) can be characterized by your 'mass energy' as a wave. But as we will see in the next electricity lecture, the overlap of plank, electron, plank waves will propogate an 'electric current' (which is not the same as electric flux).
aeinstein1904 5 years ago
Sorry I should have thought more before asking :p
teooo 5 years ago
No problem. I have scrapped 3 of my videos after I found some errors and had to re-record. I'm sure that I have more errors that I haven't found yet.
aeinstein1904 5 years ago