Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (288)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There is no way Michael Savage supports Ron Paul because the former supports Israel while the latter doesn't.

  • I agree completely

  • savage is chicken hawk shit serve then u talk u short fat fuck

  • wtf? michael weiner disagreeing? absolute nonsense. awlaki was lucky to receive a bullet, i personally wish he was decapitated.

  • al-alwaki was over there fighting against the troops leading the enemy Obama was right to kill al-alwaki he was fighting on the enemies side

  • Epic FAIL Savage.

  • Last night, a caller said she had voted for ron paul in the florida primary, and he hung up on her. He then stated, "he has as much of a chance to win as a chipmunk". He is shilling for romney now, just like everyone on the left and right in the media.

  • @thepatient08 Of course that is 100% true, Ron Paul is unelectable. Try to study American politics and the way people vote

  • Many people think Savahe is a puss. That one guy can't spell. We know who he is.

  • Hey cock sucking Michael Savage its republicans who disrespected the constitution by waging war on a sovereign country with a cockamenial story of weapons of mass destruction. Whose ass are you licking when bush invaded Iraq

    I do like Ron Paul and his views on Human rights. Unfortunately he is in the wrong party where his voice has no value

  • @TheEuphony69 Party does not mean anything anymore.

  • @TINYBABY246 Lol...

  • evil jews must be driven thru the streets in front of WHIPS SIEG HEIL

  • This is IT People !

    To Maintain FREEDOM from tyranny requires Us to put Ron Paul in the White House NOW.

    That the "Media" continues it's blackout of Ron is PROOF that they are controlled by the Evil that fears losing power.

    Last Exit before SLAVERY.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • So being pro-American and helping America is Anti-Semitism?

    What. The. Fuck?.

  • Comment removed

  • Savage is a bought out shill now to the 1 percent. He has flipflopped and is now attacking Ron Paul. He obviously got his price to sell himself out, so don't get caught up in his tirades. He is now old news.

  • How is not wanting another war a ripping of Jews?? Israel has more nuclear weapons than most any other country on the face of this planet. The USA should not have to go into debt and become impoverished to protect some small country in the middle of nowhere that is of no value to us. Sure, I consider them our friends, but like our founding fathers said, "Commerce with all, alliance with none!"

  • they should pass a law that fucktards like Michael Savage banned from ANY radio broadcasts OR ANY broadcasts period!, you sir are a fucking moron.

  • @concernedagain another Run Paul lunatic. you guys are everywhere on youtube...

  • @zieben64 Oh wait, you mean those lunatics who support our constitution. Oh wait, those lunatic who don't want to send our kids to war. Or do you mean those lunatics who want honest money so the people of this country do not get robbed from inflation to finance socialist policies and deadbeats. Wait, you mean the lunatics who want freedom and a pro business environment.

  • @EXP0SEtheFRAUDS Na, look man I agree with everything you said. Paul says some good things, but I don't think he has the complete thoughts or the ability to convince America that free market capitalism is the only way to go. Lunatic was too harsh a word, let me call him just say bumbling, or incoherent.

  • @zieben64 I take it you are a Savage supporter?, if so you are a dick, i mean, i have only listened to a couple of this guys chats and almost straight away he confused me, he speaks nonsense of the highest order about subjects he knows nothing about and its probably impossible for me to be a Ron Paul supporter as i am British living in the UK Dick :)

  • @concernedagain Yes, I'm a dick because I listened to Savage. Oh wait, you did too.

    Do I "support" Savage? What does "support" even mean, and why does this make me a dick if I do. Sometimes we agree, sometimes not, but I'm sure even a European such as yourself will find agreement with Savage sometimes. Does this then make you a dick?

  • @zieben64 Doooh, yes i listened to Savage because i wanted to gauge his intelligence of which the poor guy has none. I called you a Dick because in your very first post to me you came at me sideways, i fight fire with fire and i completely disagree with EVERYTHING Savage says, the man's a prize Dick :)

  • @concernedagain Yeah, you would say you disagree with everything Savage says, because you have preconceived judgements that will mask you from the truth. Go on, keep intentionally burying your head in the sand.

    Savage brings in aggressive logic. I don't claim he is always logical all the time, but this is where FREE THINKERS love listening to his show and judge for themselves. There are no more critical thinkers in the media...

  • @zieben64 you make no sense, truly you are following in the footsteps of Mr Savage himself. :)

  • Comment removed

  • thank you michael - you are brilliant! & you are right!

  • Michael Savage is so far off on this topic it is not even funny. There was no law passed in the middle of the night. The law was passed during the Bush administration after 9/11...

  • WOW!!!!

    This guy is an idiot and has no idea which side he is even on.

    This is the second time i have heard this Savage jackass and i do not believe i have heard anyone so ignorant.

  • Fuck this asshole, he went full statist the other day.

  • This guy is a fucking hypocrite and new world order puppet .... he hate ron Paul and loves fascism ...

  • Michelle Savage, broke back cowboy!

  • This video must have been made before Savage got the secrete memo that all these political hit men get when its time to attack Ron Paul..He's saying Ron is a racist and a Jew hater now...People wake up these people are controled propagandist.

  • Michael Savage, the flip flopper ! Listen to his last rants on Ron Paul, what a jackass...

  • Ok this is Oct 3 and this is Savage the duel personality.

    Just yesterday Dec 28, he wen on a full court press show against Ron Paul

    He went on to insult Paul as some crazy uncle. Michael Savage is losing it day by day

    Between the British banning him from the country, as well as his reading this book

    that is abusing my intelligence, Michael Savage might be a host of the past.

    Calling Hannity a salesman, and O Reilly the BS artist, Savage is now joining the

    ranks of carney barkers.

  • Savage, you want to know why most people support Ron Paul? It's because we are all sick of endless wars, a police state, and our constitution being shredded. You would throw away our constitution just so Israel can be protected. Shame on you. Shame on friggin you.

  • @EXP0SEtheFRAUDS Actually most people support Ron Paul simply because they want weed legal and prostitution. The only people who support Ron Paul are drug users and college kids who smoke pot. If Paul was to turn around and say weed should stay illegal he would literally lose over 90% of his supporters.

  • @ilovemesomechicken hmm that's interesting. I've never touched any illegal drugs, and I support Ron Paul because he is a constitutional conservative. There's no way you can be this stupid.

  • @sportstuber11 Hmmmm im sure your telling the truth

  • @ilovemesomechicken It is what it is. Don't make stupid accusations that aren't factually accurate.

  • @sportstuber11 But it is accurate. Who the fuck would support him if he was not going to legalize drugs? I guarantee you smoke weed at least.

  • @ilovemesomechicken I don't have anything against that, but I honestly haven't. There are many issues to support Paul on.The fed,our debt,cutting $1T from deficit the first yr, bringing the troops home,only declaring a war through congress, cutting 5 government agencies,he's pro life,and all about the individual liberties.Plus,he wouldn't legalize drugs,that's a huge misconception.Paul would end the war on drugs and give the rights back to the state's.

  • @EXP0SEtheFRAUDS

    Yet another RP fan ripping Israel and Jews. Fuck off.

  • @EXP0SEtheFRAUDS Our constitution doesn't have to be broken to help defend israel, all you want is Israelis to die you sick human.

  • @leedaomillz I want Israelis to die????? Hey moron, Israel pretty much has the most nuclear weapons on earth. They are perfectly capable of defending themselves. Your the sick human. You would rather spend billions to protect another country that doesn't even benefit us instead of spending the money rebuilding our roads, schools, and infrastructure. Your the sick human. You would rather have bombs instead of baby formula.

  • As a conservative, I have no respect for savage. I'm so sick of this put Israel first and the United States second mentality. It has nothing to do with hating jews or anything. Our economy is collapsing, and this moron radio host who I once respected wants to waste trillions more on useless wars. Hey Savage, wake up. We have been at war for a decade and our economy is a friggin mess. Lets start rebuilding our own country. Enough with fuc$in Israel already. People are sick of it.

  • I'm a conservative. Screw savage. He puts Israel first over the United States. Here in the US our economy is collapsing, and Savage still wants army bases and troops in 168 countries so we can protect a little country that provides us with nothing but trouble.

  • @Dangerlosophy No no Awhalaki did not try and make Obama look good but the capture and killing of him was used for political purposes to help Obama in the polls.I am not a fortune teller I read non fiction and research about 16 hours a day.If you are a dem then you should go to LaRouche Pac tv and do your own research.I use hundreds of sources but not not tv and Savage.

  • Today I lost all respect for Savage, what little I had left. On his show today, he call Libertarians pot-head liberals and Paul the Pide-Piper of the left...

  • I now have fear and respect for Michael Savage now more than ever. A 69 year old man, pushing 70 in three months, and he doesn't take the week off between Christmas and New Year's unlike the younger conservatives, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and even the king of conservative radio Rush Limbaugh. So they're younger, and taller than Savage but they don't give it as much as Savage does. They're on vacation.

  • If you declare war you can have enemy combatants, you can't flout the law on one hand and use it's protections on the other though.

  • Awlaki was a terrorist. just kill guys like him. im ok with that

  • @htoval You're okay with cops kicking the dogshit out of your people in Puerto Rico too. Most men on the mainland don't need to wait 10 minutes to get protection for our families. We've got our protection in the house, it's called the 2nd amendment.

  • Fact: Post Factor Legitimacy

  • Savage would not have gave a shit if Bush had Al Awlaki killed. It would be "GOOD! Another non white white hater is dead!"

  • @Friedstuffsable

    No he criticized the republicans in this video. Did you not listen? He said republicans did nothing about it.

  • @zoulkyud I remember in another one of his shows he said Iraq & Afghanistan were pointless. I was shocked, I mean really. I didn't expect that at all.

  • @TheBullionBull No, but if an American Citizen was running a drug cartel in South America or ruled a country in South America during the 80's and sold drugs then they would do the same. In fact, if we had a Republican president they would have done the same now, the only difference is that Obama is in so they just want to critcize him. Michael Savage is a war monger. He is a neo-con, some issues yes he is right.

  • Comment removed

  • If a Republican leader did it, it would be okay; right you scumbag Savage.

  • @britainmalbangkok Republican leaders never killed an American citizen without a trial.

  • @thisbuds4me We've seen that you can insult, now let's see if you can be reasonable. Explain, champ.

  • Michael Savage is a dumbass, but I agree with him for once. Ron Paul is 100% correct.

    Michael Savage is known for spewing retarded rhetoric often, however, and I wouldn't waste time listening to him.

  • MS is one of the more honest liars in the media lol.

  • Busg brought Suddam hussein into justice not just a bullet in the head! you think Obama could not have got ghaddafi before the war? Obama is evil and people like him because he is for gat marriage! Killing of babies most of which are black babies!!!!! so why do the black people like him? He IS KILLING YOUR BABIES and OURS!!!!!

  • I wondered why that drone kept getting bigger, then it hit me.

  • WTF? I have to be an American citizen to have rights? Get a ready for a Holy War you facist bastards.

  • Bush, Clinton, Obama = war criminals

  • Wake Up America,Awhalaki was a CIA lacky,he was an agent that was doublecrossed in order to make Obama look good! Awhalaki even dined at the Pentagon after 9/11 you're telling they were'nt on to this guy or did'nt know what he was capable of.You guys need to grow up and realise that there are elements within your government that are working towards the destruction of America and heading toward Bush Snr's New World Order.Global government destruction of your sovereignty.Study up,turn off your tv.

  • @RJordan0220 Savage flip flops like Romney does he makes my headspin.I think he's on the bottle!!!

  • Savage is becoming a libertarian...i like it!

  • Michael Savage is the only true Conservative on the radio. 

  • @sellsjeeps Michael Savage is one of the very few conservatives on radio. When it comes to the republican candidates, Ron Paul is the ONLY true conservative candidate. I saw a post on facebook that says Cain is the only conservative. How is supporting federal reserve fractional banking and fiat currency part of a conservative platform? Ron Paul is against The FED and on the side of the constitution and the people!

  • Crapistan = Pakshitstan or better still Pak-shit-stain - the shit stain of humanity!

  • He was outside the US, actively plotting to kill American citizens. Can't say I have an issue with taking this scum out.

  • @cherokee702 We give our citizens trials. This is not a dictatorship.

  • @bweazel I'm not debating the legality of it, just making an opinion. But why should we care about legality when Obama isn't Constitutionally eligible for POTUS? Forget the birth certificate; he's not a natural born (both parents citizens) as required by the Constitution. Oh, Brave New World!!!

  • crapistan? outright prejudice.

  • @MachinaSapien freedom of speech.

  • I remember Michael when You used to disagree many times with Ron Paul.

    I most include my self too. I gave a second Tough To Dr. RON PAUL.

    I DID AN HONEST RESEARCH ON HIM. HE IS OUR LAST HOPE.

    PLEASE.GIVE AN HONEST CHANCE TO RON PAUL.

  • micheal savage has to say all kinds of things for ratings but deep down, i bet he knows that Ron Paul is right and is the only real leader we could elect....how can you possibly argue against our constitution?

  • Michael Savage has definitely got his priorities in the wrong place, yesterday, he praises Herman Cain (a former Fed crony) and bashes a Ron Paul supporter who was trying to articulate why the Federal Reserve is harmful to our country, not to mention unnecessary in a free market system. Look it up, Michael Savage 10/11/11 and just listen to the hypocrisy, I like Savage most of the time, but this was pure slander.

  • Michael is spot on here. The constitution was put in place to regulate what our government does. If our government ignores the constitution to do whatever it pleases, that's tyranny.

  • HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF RUSSIA WAS DROPING BOMBS IN YOUR NEIGHBERHOOD TO KILL SOMEONE THAT WAS SPREADING ANTI RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA. AND O YA AND WHAT IF YOUR DAUGHTER WAS KILLED DURING THIS DRONE ATTACK. THINK YOU MIGHT BE PISSED? WAKE UP AMERICA WE ARE MAKING LIFELONG ENEMIES ACROSS THE GLOBE. SUPPORT RON PAUL HE IS TH E LAST HOPE FOR OUR NATION

  • The problem isn't that he was killed, the problem is Obama completely ignored all of his constitutional rights as an American citizen. Where does his jurisdiction end? Sure this guy was a terrorist, but what's to stop him from having someone who isn't a terrorist killed?... That's the issue here. Give the man his due process, and try him with something.

  • I don't get it. He is indirectly saying that it would be okay to kill a non-American for similar offense with our due process...its crazy!!!

  • All of the other more dangerous American terrorists were given trials not illegally killed.

    This is the first time that an American citizen has been illegally killed.

    Psychos like Obama are just like Hitler, believing that they have authority over the constitution

  • The U.S. District Court in D.C. is a 10 minute walk from the White House. No effort was undertaken to acquire an arrest warrant or to hold a trial in abstentia. No effort was undertaken to even determine what process is due when arrest is impractical or impossible in a case such as this.

    Only a judge and/or jury should be able to adjudicate the legal rights and classifications that will result in the execution of an American citizen.

  • He contradicted himself about not having a knee jerk reaction and actually thinking first , but goes on to talk about his knee jerk reaction and reversal of position on the killing. Priceless.

  • Finally Ron Paul became Main STREAM.HE IS WINNING. THANKS MICHAEL SAVAGE. I AM AGREE WITH YOU ON THAT MIKE. THANKS.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa We killed them because the U.S. declared war on Germany. Last time I checked, we did not declare war on Yemen.

  • @Conservative1001BG But we have effectively declared war on al-Qaeda - a group in which Awlaki was a committed leader. Should we have tried Confederate soldiers, too? The CSA was an unrecognized state, and as such, those living on CSA land were still thought, by the Union, to have US citizenship. Were we right in shooting them?

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa But still, the president shouldn't have a "hit list" and think it's ok to send drones around the world to assassinate people based on accusations and associations, especially if they're American citizens. I'd rather have the al-Awlaki guy captured and put on trial and have a sentence determined, rather than just killed off based on the assumptions of his "influence". If the executive branch assumes threats based on influence and ideas, I wonder who could be next?

  • @Conservative1001BG You're arguing like Savage - perpetually moving the goalposts. The president doesn't have a hit list of people with shady associations. That's just silly. As a point of middle ground, I'd rather have Awlaki tried, too. Just as I would have rather had every Confederate soldier tried. But in both cases, that wasn't practical. And again in both cases, as military combatants, we have the right to take them out. Acknowledge the CSA parallel and then maybe we can move on.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa There is no moving of the goalpost, the Constitution is clear that anyone with citizenship must be tried. Abraham Lincoln, for all of the fanfare that bastard gets for demagoguery on the slavery issue (which was a social evil, but not the principle aim of the civil war), hated Constitutional Law and regularly violated it when dealing with anti-war journalists. The Union Army didn't only kill Confederates, unless you haven't read about what happen in New York at that time.

  • @hellsunicorn Your unfair criticisms of Lincoln aside, to say that we can't kill an enemy leader in an armed conflict, regardless of citizenship, is to deny centuries of precedent. It's impractical, dangerous, and only relevant for guys like Savage whose job it is to be Obama's contrarian. Ask your history professor next time you see him.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa What is unfair about bringing up the fact that Lincoln regularly jailed and attempted to deport journalists for speaking their minds, or the fact that New York was literally on fire for days and the streets flowed with blood because the poor rioted for not being able to buy their way out of Lincoln's draft.

    P.S. - I learned about these events from my history professor, so try another one. Practical or not, people have rights, learn it and live it.

  • @hellsunicorn It's unfair because it's irrelevant. I asserted that the Union had the right to shoot combatants in the CSA military regardless of their citizenship. I asked you to acknowledge this. You jabbered on about New York and anti-government journalists. Please, explain. What should we do with militant citizen leaders, when arrest is impractical?

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa The answer to your question is that if arrest is never impractical. The life of one citizen takes precedence over the practicality of government power. The Civil War was, by definition, an unjust and ungodly war, and every member of the Union Army was party to mass murder. The minute the Confederacy seceded, the Union troops became foreign occupiers, ergo imperial forces. Empires are, by nature, unjust.

    QED.

  • Comment removed

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa What do you mean arrest was impractical?

    An arrest wasn't impractical at all. Al-Awlaki wasn't killed on the battlefield, that's not what happened like you stupid liberal Obama bots believe.

    The Fort Hood shooter terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan who actually shot and killed people was given a trial.

    Al-Awlaki on the other hand was simply executed by the order of the President without any due process (not killed on the battlefield).

    This guy Obama is just like Hitler 2.0

  • @Conservative1001BG Why capture the guy? Ever play capture the flag? The other team always tries to take their guy back.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa How do confederate soldiers compare to Al-Qaeda?? The war against terrorism is not a civl war...

  • @goofeykid19 the civil war was also an actual war.

  • @gutzs Hey thanks for clearing that up for me... That wasn't my question though.

  • @goofeykid19 I'm just supporting your point. Because the wars we're in right now AREN'T actual wars.

  • @goofeykid19 If you'll notice, I specifically stated that it was relevant because we shot at an killed US Citizens. Confederate soldiers, in the eyes of our government, were US Citizens. Why is that justifiable? Because they're enemy combatants. Why is killing al-Awlaki justifiable? Because he's an enemy combatant. There's the parallel.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa "effectively" doesn't cut it. We have not officially declared war on anyone since the 1940's. The law is the law.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa Well that is a terrible anolgy because you can argue that since the confederate sates secede from the union they were not US citizens. However Awlaki inspite of being an American Citizen was a member of Al Qaeda and war was declared on Al Qaeda. Could he have still been put on trial? Yes but since he was Al Qaeda, dead or alive it would be constitutional.

  • @kingcobra101z You could, but you'd be wrong. Lincoln, and every other Union leader, saw Confederates as US Citizens. By what other measure would the Emancipation Proclamation make any sense, freeing slaves in the "states in rebellion". That'd be like Lincoln freeing all the slaves in Nairobi if the CSA were seen as just another state. But it wasn't.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa What makes me wrong? Congress declared war on Al Qaeda and Awlaki was a member of Al Qaeda.

  • @kingcobra101z You mean Al CIAda the Pentagon creation ....right?

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa You clearly won this argument, all the thumbs up for this other quack are because they like that he's sticking up for Ron Paul. That despicable man didn't need a trial. We are getting too soft.

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa Who is "we"? Are you seriously using the Northern invasion of the CSA as an example of appropriate actions by the government? And your Nazi example doesn't make any sense, because we did in fact try German saboteurs and spies in court and did not simply assassinate them.

  • @TheBullionBull NAZI's got a trial, Americans are so brainwashed and brokeback that they can't make that distinction

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF RUSSIA WAS DROPING BOMBS IN YOUR NEIGHBERHOOD TO KILL SOMEONE THAT WAS SPREADING ANTI RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA. AND O YA AND WHAT IF YOUR DAUGHTER WAS KILLED DURING THIS DRONE ATTACK. THINK YOU MIGHT BE PISSED? WAKE UP AMERICA WE ARE MAKING LIFELONG ENEMIES ACROSS THE GLOBE. SUPPORT RON PAUL HE IS THE LAST HOPE FOR OUR NATION

  • @LeaningTowardsPisa

    He was an American citizen that never did anything but make speeches against the U.S. which actually isn't illegal he has a 1st amendment right as a citizen of the freedom of speech, they haven't brought up any charges that he actually DID anything. so killing him for speaking against the U.S. is WRONG!

  • @MaxLibertas Since when did the government stop being an institution comprised of American citizens?

  • Dixie Chick Jihad Jane was used to test the public reaction to U.S citizens being exterminated by Tax dollar Military Defence assets roughly 12 months prior to this event.

    The public showed no concern over a White middle aged American woman being summarily executed for having Jihadist affiliations.

  • It was wrong for the Democrats to suggest that course of action 12 months ago, and it is beginning to show now with their Intel assets being taken off the chessboard and applauded for it by the dumb public.

  • Thomas Jefferson wrote: ". A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means."

  • @Deist1965 So: can we put that on your epitaph after the government puts a bullet in your head for being a member of a group that is deemed a threat by the D.C. establishment. You are aware that there is a secret panel that creates an assassination list of U.S. citizens? Why would you think that this is a good idea?

    You are implicitly admitting that the law was broken. You are admitting that the government breaks its own laws and doesn't adhere to the Constittution.

  • Comment removed

  • @joepeeler34 as a fact of history, our government hasn't followed a "strict interpretation" of the constitution. Our revered founding father Thomas Jefferson didn't either. Jefferson wrote: "The Constitution has made no provision for our holding foreign territory, still less of incorporating foreign nations into our Union." Yet, Jefferson secured the purchase of the Louisiana territory anyway. Under Monroe, we invaded and captured Florida from Spain without congressional approval..

  • @Deist1965 Jefferson was referring to a "citizen" and not the government. We are in an undeclared (hence illegal) war on a tactic - terrorism. Since there will always be terrorism, this war will last forever. Perpetual warfare is a hallmark of totalitarianism. It's only a matter of time before we're all on the government's terrorist watch list.

    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin

  • What next person do we Drone bank robber or a small kid stealing a candy bar the United States is the biggest terrorist organization in the world I am 68 YO my forefathers fought in the Revolutionary war this nation will do nothing but rob for the rich the Muslims is only ones fighting against the one world government and we have the nerve to call them terrorist BS USA law enforcement terrorizes me more than anyone in the world

  • lol and where is or are all the other radio talk show hosts, RUSH, SEAN, MARK, et al, where are your voices you bunch of government ass kissing twerps

  • nice

  • @RamsesReturns: great comment dude! thanks

  • People question Ron Paul as a Commander in chief? He seems to make the right statement on the spot even when most people even bright people like Savage discover it later. Paul's never wishy washy and never has to change his stance. People eventually catch on later. That is beyond Presidential in my book.

  • Where in the constitution does it say enemy combatants are entitled to constitutional protections? Well - if they happen to be American...see the 14th amendment. When you're done with that, look up the 5th amendment. Don't reference the constitution if you don't know jack shit about it. Thank you, try again when you have a clue.

  • @RestrictedAccess : Man, you're a total noob @ life. What problem do you have with due diligence in determining guilt in a court of law? The biggest problems with America stem from the fact that the government itself has no regard for the rule of law as it applies to itself. This is called tyranny.

    America was designed by the founders to protect it's citizens from such tyranny; a grand experiment juxtaposed against a world where liberty barely existed. You fail hard ,bro!

  • @sotthapana

     Read my post again. I was replying to the caller's question.