Equipping for the New World Order video 2_part_3.wmv

[TheWarhead3]

people need to not only be prepared for nwo but for an invading country we have invaded countries and we have never been invaded so we need to prepare in case of a invasion

[420BenG]

for quality and accuracy i personally am in love with a carbine that is actually displayed in this video. when using the 7.62x39 im partial to a SKS with a folding stock/pistol grip synthetic stock. It allows you to use the 7.62x39 round with more accuracy than u can easily get out of an AK47. I also dont feel the NEED to convert to AK mags. a 40-50 rd permanent mag can be easily reloaded w/ stripper clips saving money and frustration w/ conversion failure which ive heard can be quite common.

[llarlamon7758]

@blackhatch46 ...by the way...the AK was designed and made so anybody could use it and massed produced for example people like the VC you didn't have to train 'em much and while it is more effective than a 5.56 at close range the FAL in 7.62 NATO is a far superior weapon in every way and even have been used as a sniper rifle. If I need to reach out further for long distance communication I rely on a .300 ultra mag.

[llarlamon7758]

@blackhatch46 First of all thank you for your service Marine while a lot of combat is within the 300m mark there are times when you need something that goes beyond 300m. Also, after 200m 7.62 x 39 doesn't really have the effective power like a 7.62 NATO does. 7.62 NATO is far superior for a main battle rifle and has the ability for long distance communication. I myself prefer the FAL in 7.62 NATO. Once again thank you for your service Semper fi.

[llarlamon7758]

@topi85 also, if u havnt noticed the elitists in this world r calling 4 a one world govt. Apparently u dont pay attention 2 the world around u. U might want 2 wake up slick. Go research David Rothschild, the Rockafellers eugenics plans. To them u r an expendable peon n they rather u die than live.

[llarlamon7758]

@topi85 actually there really r black choppers. How would u know either way? Ur in Finnland. Also there are foreign troops on U.S. soil. I hav talked 2 sum of them. They hav trained 2 fight in U.S. cities against american people. Polish, Dutch, Finn., Germans, Canadians, n Russians. 450,000+ so far by U.S. Govt. records. Do research b4 u ridicule people, that way u dont appear as an idiot.

[llarlamon7758]

Also, (my opinion) a pump shotgun w/20" bbl is more effective 4 up close n personal using 00, 000, 0000 hi vel. buckshot alternating w/slugs (hi vel.) in 3" or 3 1/2" mag. I find it quite effective 2 put a .250 ballbearing in the hp of the slug. 3 1/2" mag hi vel. slug like this will go thru 3/8" steel plate. I use blue hats 4 targets

[llarlamon7758]

While ur vids hav alot of good info I hav 2 disagree on ur firearm choices. 7.62x39 is weak past 200 yrds n even up close wont defeat lvl3A body armor but 7.62x51 ap will n has effective range of 600+yrds. Btw a .223 wont defeat lvl3A body armor.

[blackhatch46]

@llarlamon7758 most if not all firefights are in 300m or less, hence why the ak was made that way. you will not be making 600m shots.

[TheLando]

Judging from this guy's physique Cheetos will be a mainstay of a patriot's diet once the new world order comes.

[0122358]

i'm guessing that these vids were made in the early nineties?

[sparky41684]

fucking nut jobs

[Killerspider762]

5,000th veiw!!!

[SouthernNationalist]

It is time for the South to reclaim its independence from the socialist American Empire

[xjaronx]

i love my tokarev

[DarkThug13]

tokarev :) nice i Actually have one Russian Makarov n One from Bulgaria

[pac3lli]

excellent information, thank you

[AK49Gunner]

They also lost a lot of land to the Commies, in the end...

[topi85]

And if you want to train really good for combat try the paintball and airsoft guns, they give a great simulation for combat, and i know as an ex finnish coastal ranger that airsoft is good for it. Just a advice regardless that i think your militia is little off the map, but hey if you gonna do it then do it well. Im out of here goodbye!

[topi85]

But go ahead, be paranoid and wait for the "new world order" that would come in about 200 years when the whole world is destroyed by aliens, nuclear war or the climate changing. So train your little armys for that and be a rambo. Quite frankly i dont give a shit and nobody else does cause everybody are just laughing to youre fantasies of the black choppers and UN attack forces waiting in canadian border.

[athelstane1314]

just settle down and stop buying shit Thats the best and only weapon weve got left

[math9023]

how much does pasgat level 2 armor cost and do you use machine guns in your arsenal and how many members does your group have

[skullspliter888]

@mrak74 2790 rnds on one person? how do you move i call bullshit maybe 1000 but thats pushing it

[mrak74]

This has been my mission since 2004 when the awb expired, the EG magpouches I use for Chinese and Romanian drums for my arsenal of AK47's, combat load stands at 8 drums on an Alice belt, I use the Chinese chest pouch, 3 30's. extra 1500 rnds in the pouches on the chest carrier; as well as the drum pouches, that brings the ammo count to 2790 rnds!!!! and still manageable. I have amassed 150,000 rnds, steelcore, tracer, api, ap, corelokt etc....., very good video! Get a semi 1919a6!!!!!!!!

[SeppLainer]

Very good! We must be prepared.

[topi85]

Prepared for what?? Really do you people think that an army will attack you or something like that. Im not from america and i cant really understand this militia and new world order thing?? What are you so affraid of? Taxes? What? If you would not buy so many guns and train to war perhaps the FBI and ATF would concider you as an terrorist groups.

[iantmasters]

Not many people trained before our OWN citizens were senselessly MURDERED by that same ATF and FBI. Owning weapons is what makes us quintessential Americans. It is why it is protected by the Constitution and it is why we have what little freedoms we have left.

[NorseWarrior1488]

It's in our constitution that all males of military age ARE militia. Some people take that duty seriously. In times of emergency, or terrorist/NBC attack, governors would do very well to request the aid of their states unorganized militia.

The gov't thinks they have replaced us with the National Guard, but that is impossible. The Militia will REACT to tyranny, so the gov't has nothing to fear if they do not intend to infringe on our rights.

We are not afraid of anything, and we pay taxes.

[themanfromwyoming]

You're not from America. Exactly, so you wouldn't understand, but there is a little something called the United Nations, which has a penchant for giving aid to dictatorial regimes and has member states led by dictators who hate America. On top of that, they seem to be trying to rob us of our sovereignty in tiny increments until they reach their final goal: the destruction of our constitution and our freedom. THAT's what were afraid of, not taxes.

[topi85]

LoL, really youre paranoid about the UN taking over the america x) really why would they do that anyways? They havent have any army and no other country would not accept that except some iran and north korea. You just have make something up that you can have a gun and play some militia heroes. Crow up you silly people.

[themanfromwyoming]

Why would the UN try to take us over? Because when you scratch under the surface, you find a bunch of a America hating regimes who have banded together, and are using this organization as a front that appears to be promoting world peace but really isn't. Do you like the idea of one world government, or would you prefer that your country is able to maintain its sovereignty? We're not making excuses to pretend to be heroes, we just want to be prepared for what could happen.

[themanfromwyoming]

Denial is the one thing that hurts you the most. You deny that this or that could ever happen, or that it will happen to someone else, but it happens to you. Before 9/11, Americans probably would have scoffed at the idea that terrorists could do what they did to us, but it happened. I would also like to add that the UN does have a so called "peace keeping force." Which they could easily use to just do the opposite. You ever seen those guys in the blue helmets? THATS what I'm talking about.

[topi85]

And really no country wouldnt be so stupid to attack the US, you guys have sooo much nuclear missiles that it would be suicide. And there will never be one coverment over the hole world. It wouldn work never and i think many countries would oppose it.

[themanfromwyoming]

Your right, and our nukes aren't the only thing. Maybe the UN wouldn't try to take over the WORLD, but they sure like to boss people around, especially us. And maybe they could rally their member nations to gang up on us, That wouldn't exactly be a skirmish.

[topi85]

If some countries would want to attack us they would do an own alliance like warsaw pact and then attack the us, not by via UN. Like north korea, china, iran and syria would be the countries that would attack you, if they would have the machines for it. They would give a shit about the UN they would come aggressively on attack against us if they would have the economy and armies for that.

[themanfromwyoming]

I'll also tell you that there are plenty of misguided politicians in the U.S. who would be more than willing to hand over some of our sovereignty to the UN if somethings in it for them, thus allowing them to call more of the shots and screw with our independence. It could happen here, just as well, it could happen in your country. It could happen anywhere. It's not paranoia, its keeping a watchful eye on this organization, and trying not to let them usurp more power from independent nations.

[topi85]

Yes i know the guys in the blue helmets. My two cousins are UN peacekeepers and they arent trained to attack in a wide attack, only to protect themself if they are attacked by someone in a high risk zone, like afrcia where they have served. And if a country would attack US the NATO would come to aid and many other countries. And to a fact you have the most effective military so why are you so consired off this "huge" attack against USA??

[themanfromwyoming]

Did you ever hear the story of David and Goliath? We're like Goliath, and if the UN was methodical and cautious, they could probably take away all of our power and our freedom without firing a shot, just like how hitler won over the German people. And then guess what? The only ones who could stop them would be unorganized, clandestine militia groups. Just like in the Revolutionary War. So, your cousins are UN peace keepers? I wonder if they even know what it is that they're associated with.

[topi85]

Yeah and you have the balls to say that about my cousins, you havent even seen war if your not have been in us army if so then you have. They have been keeping up the peace in Tschad, and they are associated to keep up the peace in war zones like africa in a very small unit, theyr unit strong was 50 men and the near by warlord army about 400, so they arent there to make new world order they are there to stop the killing of civilians which the warlords and goverment do int that region.

[themanfromwyoming]

I didn't say I had anything personally against your cousins. How could I when I don't even know them? I'd like to think that these UN peacekeepers are generally good, they just don't see the evils of the organization that they work for.

[topi85]

And one thing? If a new world order would happend(problably not) do you think that your militia would beat it. I think not, they would have a freakin big army with all the shibang and stuff. They would crush you. But before it they would have to beat us military what would be a big and a long timed war. It would never happend.

[themanfromwyoming]

Yes, I do. During the American Revolution a bunch of farmers with muskets evolved into a well organized army, and managed to defeat the most powerful military force the world had ever seen, thus we were able to win our independence. Sure the weapons and tactics have changed quite a bit, but that wouldn't make any difference. We would also most likely use guerilla tactics. The UN forces wouldn't see it coming. The side that uses well planned Guerilla tactics, like the Warsaw Jews in '44 or....

[themanfromwyoming]

....the British "Desert Rats" in North Africa has the best chances. I have no doubt that well organized, well concerted, accurately timed attacks on UN munitions depots could net us a lot of heavy hardware, like tanks and missle batteries, to level the playing field a little bit.

[topi85]

Really the UN arent here in the world to take over the USA, they are here to make peace what they dont do very well because they cant do a shit in combat, only to be some warzone and advice the others not to kill each other, and this is what my cousins have told me that theyre job is so worthless and they should be more aggressive to achive something in wars. So by this fact too they would have the balls to start a war against us.

[themanfromwyoming]

Maybe that wasn't their original purpose, but the UN sure seems to be a pretty corrupt, power hungry organization these days.

[topi85]

yea yea i know really good that little army can beat a bigger won, hey im from finland and what did we do in world war 2? We beat the crap out of ruskies, the losses in finnish side was about 100 000 and soviet was little over 1 million, so were kind a bad asses too. And after that many countries have copied the winter war tactics from the finnish army, we were superb in those conditions.

[themanfromwyoming]

Yeah, you kicked those commies' asses. That was cool. They had it coming.