English bibles are a Transliteration and are far from Translations. The KJV was written with the Mesoretic (OT) and Textus Receptus (NT). Basically all other "mainstream" transliterations are from the Septuagint (Greek OT) and the Alexandrian/Siniaiticus/Vaticanus codexs (NT). Greek was not the original language.
Just do this...Throw your English bible away, learn Hebrew and when you've learned the OT, then move on to the Aramaic NT and everything will make sense.
Learn Ancient Aramaic and Ancient Greek, then read the source material used at the Cardinals Council when the bible (any - all versions stem from there) was compiled from the myriad scrolls, books and other sources. Trace each back to its roots and read those, properly transliterated (that's translation that is also taking into account colloquielisms of the time). Not one can be "correct", because none of the currently used versions has all of those sources correct. That's logic.
Smart of you to disguise yourself as a christian to ask a question that has no answer, because it just comes back to "What authority makes the bible true"?
well, the bible has many contradictions and yes, you CANT call yourself logical if you beleive the bible because for the reason you said and even the bible got right, you cant have two contradicting things be both true
Get hold of a copy of 'On the Origin of Species', it is available in many languages and it whatever version you read it says the same thing.
mrpamayer 9 months ago
English bibles are a Transliteration and are far from Translations. The KJV was written with the Mesoretic (OT) and Textus Receptus (NT). Basically all other "mainstream" transliterations are from the Septuagint (Greek OT) and the Alexandrian/Siniaiticus/Vaticanus codexs (NT). Greek was not the original language.
Just do this...Throw your English bible away, learn Hebrew and when you've learned the OT, then move on to the Aramaic NT and everything will make sense.
kevinseanob 1 year ago
@RyuDarragh
Correction, that's a bunch of useless information you gave.
kruzer32 1 year ago
Learn Ancient Aramaic and Ancient Greek, then read the source material used at the Cardinals Council when the bible (any - all versions stem from there) was compiled from the myriad scrolls, books and other sources. Trace each back to its roots and read those, properly transliterated (that's translation that is also taking into account colloquielisms of the time). Not one can be "correct", because none of the currently used versions has all of those sources correct. That's logic.
RyuDarragh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you think the bible is gods word, i don't care about contradictions, you're god is immoral, and if you agree with him, you're immoral.
daemonowner 1 year ago
Smart of you to disguise yourself as a christian to ask a question that has no answer, because it just comes back to "What authority makes the bible true"?
Basicpiviot 1 year ago
well, the bible has many contradictions and yes, you CANT call yourself logical if you beleive the bible because for the reason you said and even the bible got right, you cant have two contradicting things be both true
blazereef 1 year ago