A figure on the screen in a cinema show watches the world. An illiusory being watches an illusory world. You & the world are as real as the cinema figure and world.
This part of the vid is crap.Quantum physics, quantum mechanics dis proves evolution this video is trying to make evolution sound like it's in line with quantum mechanics.. it's not.it disproves evolution. Its actually more in line with a infinite consciousness allowing us be conscious observers.
@mrkingcat2 how can you say that? is there not evolution in the human mind? just because the missing link has not been found doesn't make it crap right. give it a chance. assumptions too soon.
How do you know that the earth is not a closed system? Earth is a space that is different from vacuum space... Doesn't this separation contains earth as a system of its own? And how do you know universe is not a closed system? We say some sort of closed container a closed system but doesn't earth act in a way like a container? It does conceived a system of its own, I think. No words are wrong, no ideas are wrong and there are still room for discoveries. Don't call him stupid.
Now my question is. If the membrane of a 11th dimension comes into contact with ours. Could it explain a black hole seeing that its gravity is so strong that light cannot escape. Could this be a contact point with the 11th dimension producing 100% gravity. Ive only started studying the laws of Physics for a few short months and trying to understand.
Entropy is a thermodynamic property that can be used to determine the energy available for useful work in a thermodynamic process. As you know gravity is not bound to our dimension and branes make contact with each other and creates distortions on the brane we inhabitat thus producing The big bang / Solar systems and so forth. As per all theories about the 11th dimension gravity is equal to the other forces eg. EM, S and escapes only enough for us to experience some of it.
So many of these geniuses, who give the world so much, live lonely desperate lives. They're often plagued with depression and insanity. It's as if an exquisite mind comes with a price. It's seems so unfair.
Can somebody that knows what they are talking about help me out here. What is the difference between order and disorder/chaos. Aren't these just consrtucts that the human mind has devised based on perception and conditioning. Isn't 'chaos' just a more complex form of order.
Is uncertainty real - or is it just that we can't devise a way of measuring some things that are nevertheless certain if only we could understand the mechanisms of their operation.
at one point, a little bit of an overstatement. The 20th century wasn't the biologist's century, it was a chemist century. This century is the century of quantum physics and post-Darwinian biology. The biologists shall lead the way. Frankly it is a little bit embarassing that humanity hasn't moved on that much about quantum physics since the 1920s, where most of the best theories are formulated.
everything that has a beginning indeed has an end, everything is brought to a state of destruction, from the moment it is made. I therefore await eagerly the -time- when the U.S imperialism will come to an end, knowing obviously that it will happen with massive force and destruction all over, and knowing it will most probably be the destruction of myself at the same time, it would still have been worth to have lived to witness.
To think of it, the world we live in is confined to physically earth, thus a temporal closed system is achieved, making entropy possible for biological life since they are physically confined by gravity, sustenance and terrain. Unless of course, life can eventually evolve to freely move outside the earth's atmosphere and travel to space, but then again confined to the solar system, due to constraint of distance and time, subject itself to a much larger confined space where entropy again exists.
God was created in order to avoid the truths these men were painfully aware of. Believing in God makes men feel special and secure. Nature is ABOUT change. Man needs patterns and security. Thus, an idea of an invisible man in the sky who cares about him and knows the number of hairs on his head, keeps him from facing the real truth about the world...The truth is, it's not all about you.
God died,was reborn in the form of everything that exist.no longer a God,God lives and experience life to understand ITself.when the universe dies,IT will reborn as a God.
God died,was reborn in the form of everything that exist.no longer a God,God lives and experience life to understand ITself.when the universe dies,IT will reborn as a God.
Maybe the deepest truth of reality which is beyond the multiverse and beyond hyperspace and beyodnd the concept of a multi-multiverse containing an infinite number of multiverses there is the conclusion of everything eternally beyond all this, and maybe we cannot search to find a true end to it all because we cannot leave what does not exist and that somehow nothing exists yet throughout nothing somehow the illusion of everything emerges maybe
boltzmann was a marxist darwinian whos efforts to prove decay inspired and justified the mass genocide of millions of ppl, but because his ideology is so opposite to what is good in life it left him alone and sent him mad !.in nature a poisonous plant has no friends the earth around it is barren just as in life a poisonous idea will eventually be shunned. a frightening thing for a layman to comprehend is that these destructive ideologies are taught to our academics and leaders as truth!
@antonny11 Politics and paradigms only exist to distract you from looking for the truth the true reason why we are here on this earth plain which is abundant and there need be no suffering and yet suffering is itself abundant.
@antonny11 take it to anger management class or better yet engage your brain past your primitive aggressive tendencies you've been programmed and cannot break out i will say a prayer for you peace love and light!=)
Very biased, entropy says things go from order to chaos, but then they say evolution or order and design from randomness is possible. Doesn't even make sense. intricate design cannot come from randomness. Design is evidence of intelligence. Even the most simple cell is very complex if you break it down. In no way can randomness create life. Mathematically it is absurd., yet it is accepted today.
Ice crystals develop intricate designs from simpler structures - because the more complex structures are mathematically possible and physics makes them probable as the fluid state is lost.
You are confusing potential energy with order. Entropy states that a system will eventually lose its potential energy. It says nothing about order. A highly ordered system can have no potentially energy just like a disordered system. However, the overall trend towards entropy my increase order.
You really should read a few science books before you try to argue about things that you clearly don't understand.
"entropy says things go from order to chaos"
No it doesn't. Entropy says nothing at all. It is simply a measure of the amount of disorder in a system. You are getting it mixed up with the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy always increases in a closed system. This does no apply to life since it's not a closed system.
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi I agree but how can you be certain that life is not a closed system? Which life are you referring to? Life as we know it, beginning with being born and ending the day we die? Or life after death? Or life before we are born? ..... just asking...
Biological life is an open system. You eat, drink, take up oxygen, expel waste and loose energy to the environment. Life isn't even remotely a closed system.
But it, (entropy)does apply to the universe which is a closed system. Within this universe , we may have open systems which grows with complexity (i.e ecosystems), but this is only because that system is supplied by energy i.e. the Sun. Stars burn out, eventually, and without these energy producing engines, the universe will turn black and eventually, all we will have left is photons bumping around in space. Unfortunately, my friend, it is you who are wrong and they, who are right.
But it, (entropy)does apply to the universe which is a closed system. Within this universe , we may have open systems which grows with complexity (i.e ecosystems), but this is only because that system is supplied by energy i.e. the Sun. Stars burn out, eventually, and without these energy producing engines, the universe will turn black and eventually, all we will have left is photons bumping around in space. Unfortunately, my friend, it is you who are wrong and they, who are right.
No, actually I am completely right as I was talking about life and not the universe as a whole and the other guy was talking nonsense about how increases in complexity are impossible because of entropy.
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi The most people that liked your reply, probably they don't know what the heck you're on about... But because of their ego they clicked that " like"button cause belonging to a crowed it's in human nature. So, are thermodynamics random or our ego? ;)
I'm familiar with the concept of a closed system only from what I've read about the game theory, so this might no apply, but there are closed systems around us. We create them, and we live in one in many aspects. Only perspective where earth is open system is "sun's perspective". It's just odd to think we only live in open or closed systems, seems to me we live in both.
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi Our bodies are FULL of examples of entropy, ur right though, thinking of entropy in terms of from order to chaos is very narrow, it's true that the process of entropy does lead to change "chaos" but its merely a consequence of entropy, not a definition of what decay is... if you want to understand entropy, simple think of a candle being place outside in direct sunlight "you've just increased the candles entropy" not "entropy made it melt"
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi not even I can remember. but stars do burn out. if we don't act soon we won't be able to create a universe to rerun our test of values.
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi you dont know if life is a closed system or not, you dont know if you have free will or not, you dont even know for sure if you exist or not, or if anything youve been taught is true
how can material create life? it's material..! This is Darwin's stupidity..! continuing with your hypothesis, death is inevitable.. so the end of the world is inevitable.. just as it started from somewhere it will end...and if the whole universe ends.. there is nothing to continue or regenerate from.. so this ends the cycle.. and there will be no more death.. so death would stop..
Chaos itself is subjective.. it is a name to something we can't understand fully..!
so death is inevitable.. that's quite.. orderly.. isn't it? everything.. no matter what it is.. how long it stays.. will.. eventually.. collapse..
and answering your comment about quantum mechanics.. what is to us a probability is known with complete certainty to the creator of the universe... the way I see it... everything is ordered even if we can't see it.. but from what we can see.. we have enough to conclude of: our own insignificance.. and the certainty of a creator..
5. After saying this the implication is that CERTAINTY is RELATIVE, in degrees in altering stages regarding knowledge and phenomena. It is provisional during the evolution process, changing alternately, periodically at different times regarding "understanding-processes". Certainty does NOT HAVE to be an absolute. It's not necessary. Therefore I leave the question about the ultimate goal of consciousness ASIDE. Defining the "nature" of the problem is already half-way to "CERTAINTY" - ENOUGH.
4. Besides, "FLEXIBILITY" just GOT to be there, if only in the name of CREATIVITY. EVEN in the SCIENCE there is a "creative" element not widely acknowledged. PROGRESS would be IMPOSSIBLE without POSSIBILITY for pondering, accepting or rejecting, not to mention "moods", emotions and so on. UNCERTAINTY "creates", allows internal - external RECIPROCAL EFFECT - "SPACE" where the "TO BECOME TO UNDERSTAND" - PHENOMENA "happens".
3. From the ABSOLUTE "certainty's" point of view even the uncertain IS CERTAIN. Uncertainty HAS to be RETAINED in ORDER to GET TO KNOW the "NATURE" of "certainty" in it's various, diverse degrees regarding phenomenas in the "life"-process. If there would be NO consciousness, NO observer, NO thinker, NO experiencer , No mind ( mind is related to uncertainty ) THEN - WHERE WOULD BE the NEED for "CERTAINTY"?
Thoughts, movements etc - as WE know them, are possible BECAUSE of the UNCERTAINTY, NOT because of certainty. Our "Life" is an uncertainty - "FUNAMBULIST" - process to get to KNOW certain - FOREVER.
Nothing is absolutely CERTAIN from the relative, limited consciousnesses point of view. Finally, ultimately, absolutely "EVERYTHING" ( so to say ) is "certain". DEFINITE certainty IMPEDES carrying out a RELATIVELY free WILL. Deeper meaning of our "emergency" ( if you don't mind me saying so ) is to BECOME to UNDERSTAND. This process is called "LIFE".
Boltzmann was mistaken to believe God can not determine outcomes because of thermodynamics. Quantum mechanical events require a complementarity field. God's omnipresence enables Him to set the conditions that determine events that are uncertain from our perspective. Eventually BBC's celebration of godlessness will come down upon their heads.
@seanmPWH omnipresence, huh? Is he omnipotent too? I find it humourous that people feel the need to explain everything they don't understand with the great mental panacea - god. Oh widddums, does it scare you that there is stuff too big, too small and too unpredictable for your brain to comprehend?
@seanmPWH I see the attraction of Bohr - a duality, a certainty... although the duality relation doesn't totally square up. Bohr's theory needs some work, there is still something we have yet to figure out. Oh no! An uncertainty! Quick, fill it with god!
The title of that show is a bit misleading. Their discoveries were not dangerous. What was dangerous was the hostility of the scientific community of their time.
@anarkoFred I agree a lot fo their problem was related to peer pressure , but what they uncovered is still here and many scientists ignore it.
Set theory cannot be resolved and that places all rigorous math on loose footing.
In fact , the closer you look the worse it gets. Watch any of Greg Chaitins videos, he picks up where Turing left off and ...it gets a lot worse for rigorous math and physics. /watch?v=svzGGHdqst8
what is the purpose for knowing these things? looks like they got so obsess with wanting to know those things that somehow in the process they sold their souls to the devil so they can know it....
our purpose is to walk in the Way of Yahweh...and that will get us from point a to point b...
@YAHWEHisperfect how do you know Yahweh didn't plan their destinies in such a matter?All of them were religious people(well except the last one)and thus had some kind of faith that God was guiding their paths.If man was made in the image and the likeness of God,then doesn't that mean that we are also creators?That we must make something,anything in this inferior reality,in order to be closer to our God offered purpose?Also,one must sacrifice for one's creation,what's the point to getting to "b"?
The easter bunny seems to exist only in the minds of those who place their ultimate reliance on science and science is of man, man will always fail you.
@jonesgerard And what has the converse provided us with? Has His invisible hand fed us or clothed us or cured our diseases? While man may be fallible, at least its very best and altruistic are working for the benefit of our species.
@jonesgerard Isn't it our parents who gave us brains and the hands? And if even so, then do we need a God in the first place?
What is He to do if what we can do, we can do ourselves? Provide us with a place to go to after we die? Nepenthe for our sorrows? Inspiration for our works?All three that i have mentioned, can be also be applied to whatever caricature of your fancy - a Guardian Angel, a talking pink unicorn. And why "God" specifically? Why not Thor or Yahweh or the Greek Pantheon?
@kinxectic People call upon God when they run into something they cannot defeat, try drug addiction. The reason for God specifically is thats the only concept that works when all our clever ideas fail. But the God idea works and it works very fast.
If I were looking for evidence for God I would be looking among the dregs of society, not under a microscpe. They live under bridges.
@jonesgerard Late reply. The capacity to provide relief is not a piece of convincing evidence for Christian existentialism, because there are many substitutes even more implausible than God that could provide the exact conceivable repose. Like a child's imaginary friend to comfort him during a storm - but does it exist? Hence, I find your statements quite patronizing, that never mind that God doesn't exist, so long as He is able to provide comfort, and that's all that matters.
@kinxectic - But how can we know that a child's imaginary friend does not exist? By definition, does this friend not exist, at the least, within the child's imagination? (Just enjoying turning ideas around to see the light sparkle within them.)
If you have a pair of oxen and one is sick and the other is healthy, which one do you work? Of course you work the healthy one and care for the sick; so that it may too become healthy again.
Also, more things are important in life than materialistic possession. The laws laid in the Ten Commandments (like do not kill) fill us in our minds, spiritually. To care for other people and indeed turn the other cheek. God has apetised me, at least, mentally. Where I seek to be fed.
@noionxion I applaud you for being able to see the good of religion, and has applied its better tenets for the benefit of your life. Sadly, those financially well endowed and with great political power do not see religion as you do, but only ostentatiously so, using faith for their own means, supported by theology no less. Like Reformation or Dominion theology.
Also, for every positive aspect of Christianity you cited, there will always be a negative aspect. How does one distinguish?
@noionxion Continued: But by one's own judgment, that is always skewered towards the good of our fellow man. Yes i know, human judgment is fallacious, but, being a humanist, I believe in the power of man to alleviate himself from material and spiritual poverty. For instance, Romans 13:1-5 indicated that Christianity supported slavery, as did 1 Peter 2:18, and Titus 3:1. Yet conversely, there were verses that condemned slavery as the first epistle to Timothy showed.
@noionxion Continued: this moral ambiguity was finally resolved after a good 1700 years. You see, Christianity has not been an entirely spotless track record when it comes to morality - more often than not, a majority of believers simply submitted to the moral ethos of the day like burning witches, or joining crusades. As the Buddha was attributed to saying, "Believe nothing even if I had said it...only believe if it follows your own reasoning and common sense".
@kinxectic Going to start by saying thanks for the truly lovely reply. One thing that people fail to understand is that these books were written for a time that these ideas were acceptable. Slavery was publicly used by the Romans and it helped them build their empire.
I'm not saying slavery is a good thing, just saying we must understand the time for when such ideas were not only plausible but normal.
@noionxion Expecting an atheist to see the facts in context is a fruitless expectation.
Content without context is a pretext for a textproof.
Thats exactly what they do, pull a verse , take it completely out of its conext then claim its evil. They don't notice the slight of mind their ego pulls on them.
@kinxectic Also, there will always be a mindless flock of people who act without thought. Take for example the sighting of the Mosque near ground zero, the way people reacted to this and didn't want it built there was purely disgusting in my opinion.
Back on topic, I'm not saying follow anything without thought. These ideals have been around for many years and many still hold to have great ideals!
@kinxectic I look at these ideals as just massive metaphors. Do I honestly believe God created the world in 7 days? No. But the ideas held in there are great. They should be a humanitarians greatest relief. That thousands of years ago people were saying not to seek revenge, that materials are nought to the mind, that charity is good and that sharing the wealth and caring for the poor person is what is not only expected, but is the responsibility of those who can do it.
For exampel, i am still to see an intelligent anti-darvinist being truly convinced of the purely logical superiority of their arguments. One will always have the feel, here is one who thinks/feels it preferable to defend old (and tried) lies/inventions/conventions against uneasy (or potentially dangerous) truths. And there is allways the real danger (well, it's rather common rule) that scientific "truths" will morph into monsterous/deformed clones in the broader political/public arena...
"Times when people felt that new ideas could upset society's FRAGILE structure"...?
So, where was here a deep rooted believe in the God-given-ness of the prevailing order of *things*?
As if decay and change were not a universal (fearful) human experience through all times! And the only sane option we have is to intentfully and knowingly cloak us in (varying degrees) from the most stark aspects of the human condition...
Who says that God cannot be change (Ok, the bible says that He is the same always and forever, but so is change)? When a new discovery comes along in science, people doubt the existence of God. Science can shed some light on Who God is every time there is a new discovery. Why do they have to be opposites or cancel each other? I love science because it makes me think and ponder about God.
I hate how the creators of this program attempt to spin these stories in a political light. I just don't believe that Boltzmann's theories on statistical mechanics had such a profound effect on political thought. The political impact is really exaggerated in this video.
@jonesgerard There are thousands of gods for you to choose from in human history...thousands of religions... as I said before... the hubris of your statement is self-evident... get educated
@emiljanowicz but there is indeed one God, one creator, only one. With more than one, there would be disorder as they would fight. With no God, there would be nothing, no particle to blast in the big bang, no order of particles to make atoms, then cells, then organisms.
It is God..! Allah = God in Arabic.. Arab Christians and Jews say Allah..!
Instead of calling religions with such labels.. I would recommend you open a book and read about Islam. The best book to learn what more than a billion people around the world believe in, is the Quran, there are English translations.. It's about 600 pages.. read it and then tell me if you still think that.. :)
@amtahboub I have read the quran and it disgusts me deeply. its presented as the final, un-alterable, word of god...which means it cannot be changed or criticized, its all you need. its pure barbaric nonsence that degrads women and is the root cause of so much hatred in the world today...its also historically plagerized from earlier religions.
I doubt your honesty, I think you have just read this biased description somewhere.
It is very rude and inconsiderate calling the religion of more than 1.5 billion people around the world with such names. The media where you come from has made it sound OK to call such names to my glorious religion. Can you say the same inappropriate comments about jews or judaism? Anyway.. It is one God only and it is One religion... Moses, Jesus, Mohammad, Abraham all present Gods only religion.
The Qur'an also states that fresh water and salt water can't be mixed: (Sura 25:53).
"He is the One who merges the two seas; one is fresh and palatable, while the other is salty and undrinkable. And He separated them with a formidable, inviolable barrier (evaporation)"
@Draugh39 "The Qur'an also states that fresh water and salt water can't be mixed"
I'm not a muslim but this is a metaphor for mixing good and evil thoughts, you can try but evil will win if you persist. Its a take on the garden of evil and eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil.
@amtahboub You guys should stop with this god-allah my religion is better discussion , or else someone is going to declare hole jihad against the other person. Cut it out ! Discuss the subject of the video clip, not some dumb unrelated topic.
My discussion is not about religions. This is what the ignorant guys are trying to make it become. My point was merely that more scientific discoveries prove the existence of a creator of the universe..
I am really trying to be scientific.. But Islamophobes are everywhere..
@amtahboub A great man once sed I AM A SMART MAN... BUTT I DON'T KNOW WHUT LOVE IS...
Something you've said or posted somewhere must have tipped off your phobic fans that you are Islamic. Perhaps it is time for you to remove the "Kick Me" sign taped to the back of your shirt...
Lol..! That is what they call, blame the victim! I do not have to hide my opinion or religion from anywhere on youtube to avoid phobics! It's their problem not mine..! This is like asking a jew to hide the fact that he is one under Hitler's rule! very wrong approach!
@amtahboub Are you even watching the video? The whole video explains how these men completely turned mathematics and physic on its head. Physics was once proof of a creator because everything was ordered and has his place. We know now this is not true. So how does that prove a creator?
@amtahboub - mankind has had multiple gods for far longer than it has had just one. Some cultures still have multiple gods and yet we all still exist. Polytheistic societies also created civilisation, science, etc. quite some time before the idea of a single god. So your ideas are, quite simply, incorrect. Aside from the fact that all gods or a god are an invention of the human imagination, created solely to explain gaps in our knowledge until we rationalised the world more effectively.
So... Humans created God? Hmm.. But who created Humans then? Oh and.. the very orderly universe, I wonder..? Is it chance? can chaos result in something of extreme order? By chance? If coincidence was able to make an organism so sophisticated like humans.. why did it not make.. say.. an electrical motor.. or.. a PC! I think a human is a much more complicated thing for a coincidence to make it..!
Mankind had ONE God since God created the first man..!
If the electrons didn't spin around the nucleus and around themselves, the same way the planets spin around their suns and themselves, and if the human eye did not have two kinds of receptors, one for light intensity and the other measuring wavelength (color), if the water of the rivers and the seas was mixed.. then i would not see any extreme order..!
@amtahboub Yes you would. You think there is "extreme order" because this is the universe you were born into. It doesn't matter how it ended up, as long as it could support life, it allowed you to occur, and for you to have illogical thoughts.
@amtahboub I haven't made a hypothesis, and calling you illogical is not in itself illogical, because you are, in fact, illogical. You believe that the universe is particularly ordered just because you were born into this universe and not a different one. It's like being proud of the country you're born in for no reason other than being born there. The only difference is that you think there's some actual physical significance to the universe you were born in. It's illogical.
Well, you can't actually prove your point. You cannot prove me wrong. Also, logical or not depends or the level of knowledge you have. It is illogical to have black clouds for two days without it raining, for an average person, but it is logical for someone who studies meteorology and knows why. To you I am illogical because you are incapable (willingly) to understand. It is illogical for someone in the year 800 to say that there are things called EM waves..! but now we know.
This has been flagged as spam show
@TVkeyse and what woulhd be that truth to u?
llamascanplaynitendo 4 months ago
there is only one certainty and is death
TVkeyse 5 months ago
@TVkeyse and thats not certain either
longfootbuddy 5 months ago in playlist More videos from DorianDawn
This has been flagged as spam show
@longfootbuddy how do you know , have you ever died and then came back ?
no one can argue abouth death , one day you will die and yes you will find out the truth
TVkeyse 5 months ago
A figure on the screen in a cinema show watches the world. An illiusory being watches an illusory world. You & the world are as real as the cinema figure and world.
ramanasei 5 months ago
This part of the vid is crap.Quantum physics, quantum mechanics dis proves evolution this video is trying to make evolution sound like it's in line with quantum mechanics.. it's not.it disproves evolution. Its actually more in line with a infinite consciousness allowing us be conscious observers.
mrkingcat2 5 months ago
@mrkingcat2 how can you say that? is there not evolution in the human mind? just because the missing link has not been found doesn't make it crap right. give it a chance. assumptions too soon.
undergroundjackal 5 months ago
How do you know that the earth is not a closed system? Earth is a space that is different from vacuum space... Doesn't this separation contains earth as a system of its own? And how do you know universe is not a closed system? We say some sort of closed container a closed system but doesn't earth act in a way like a container? It does conceived a system of its own, I think. No words are wrong, no ideas are wrong and there are still room for discoveries. Don't call him stupid.
silvisakeru 5 months ago
stupid society
FreeeeS 6 months ago
They found in infinity and through mental practice became part of it 1010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010
carl5192 6 months ago
the actors who resemble the geniuses must be their resurecction with half a BRAIN....
MrStalinArt 7 months ago
Italian scientist said '' Darwin's theory of evolution and progress '' 2.50-55 side by side which shows he knows nothing about the Darwin's theory...
formfuction 7 months ago
It is interesting how this concept of Entropy has spilt on other fields of science other than Physics, e.g. Information Theory.
When shutting down my operating system (Free BSD), I get the following message:
"Writing entropy file ......... Terminated"
I wonder what this entropy file is. I guess it has something to do with the generation of random numbers.
johmarsch 8 months ago
Now my question is. If the membrane of a 11th dimension comes into contact with ours. Could it explain a black hole seeing that its gravity is so strong that light cannot escape. Could this be a contact point with the 11th dimension producing 100% gravity. Ive only started studying the laws of Physics for a few short months and trying to understand.
foggylegend 9 months ago
Entropy is a thermodynamic property that can be used to determine the energy available for useful work in a thermodynamic process. As you know gravity is not bound to our dimension and branes make contact with each other and creates distortions on the brane we inhabitat thus producing The big bang / Solar systems and so forth. As per all theories about the 11th dimension gravity is equal to the other forces eg. EM, S and escapes only enough for us to experience some of it.
foggylegend 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you know everything, you don't know anything
punkindrublic5 9 months ago
So many of these geniuses, who give the world so much, live lonely desperate lives. They're often plagued with depression and insanity. It's as if an exquisite mind comes with a price. It's seems so unfair.
zoeyjusko 9 months ago
@zoeyjusko Try being a musician (maybe not a genius) that plays music no one understands. This video is giving me great comfort
Rockulaproductions 9 months ago
Boltzmann helped to swing the ideological pendulum from Parmenides' view of unchanging perfection to Heraclitus' view of constant change.
PraetorDrew 9 months ago
Can somebody that knows what they are talking about help me out here. What is the difference between order and disorder/chaos. Aren't these just consrtucts that the human mind has devised based on perception and conditioning. Isn't 'chaos' just a more complex form of order.
Is uncertainty real - or is it just that we can't devise a way of measuring some things that are nevertheless certain if only we could understand the mechanisms of their operation.
TheSmithDorian 10 months ago
@TheSmithDorian ii like ur ideas. its sort of a perception thing.
bobmoore20 9 months ago
Isn't buddha the genious of entropy seeing as he used to talk of impermanence.
ecaepevolhturt 10 months ago
it is a open system only relative to the time of arrow forwards
rabbanif 10 months ago
3:50 I love the raw honesty of the paintings.
lamp779 10 months ago 8
at one point, a little bit of an overstatement. The 20th century wasn't the biologist's century, it was a chemist century. This century is the century of quantum physics and post-Darwinian biology. The biologists shall lead the way. Frankly it is a little bit embarassing that humanity hasn't moved on that much about quantum physics since the 1920s, where most of the best theories are formulated.
PoonJeffrey 11 months ago
everything that has a beginning indeed has an end, everything is brought to a state of destruction, from the moment it is made. I therefore await eagerly the -time- when the U.S imperialism will come to an end, knowing obviously that it will happen with massive force and destruction all over, and knowing it will most probably be the destruction of myself at the same time, it would still have been worth to have lived to witness.
reallyfullofmyself 11 months ago
To think of it, the world we live in is confined to physically earth, thus a temporal closed system is achieved, making entropy possible for biological life since they are physically confined by gravity, sustenance and terrain. Unless of course, life can eventually evolve to freely move outside the earth's atmosphere and travel to space, but then again confined to the solar system, due to constraint of distance and time, subject itself to a much larger confined space where entropy again exists.
danielgogeta 11 months ago
@ 1:04 reminds me of that quote by Mephistopheles from Goethe's 'Faust', "All that comes into being is worthy of destruction." lol.
So yeah, we all start physically dying from the moment that we're born. It's just our souls that are eternal.
AgdrAgon999 1 year ago
Really interesting.
hanson666999 1 year ago
God was created in order to avoid the truths these men were painfully aware of. Believing in God makes men feel special and secure. Nature is ABOUT change. Man needs patterns and security. Thus, an idea of an invisible man in the sky who cares about him and knows the number of hairs on his head, keeps him from facing the real truth about the world...The truth is, it's not all about you.
Man creates religion
Man forgets he created religion
Man becomes dependent on his own creation
MrTruthAddict 1 year ago
God died,was reborn in the form of everything that exist.no longer a God,God lives and experience life to understand ITself.when the universe dies,IT will reborn as a God.
evilchimp69 1 year ago
God died,was reborn in the form of everything that exist.no longer a God,God lives and experience life to understand ITself.when the universe dies,IT will reborn as a God.
evilchimp69 1 year ago
MATT DAAAAAAMON
poeticpeoples 1 year ago
the "not even God would last forever" statement seems to be a haunting from a statement made by Friedrich Nietzsche "God is Dead"...
windiesman 1 year ago
Maybe the deepest truth of reality which is beyond the multiverse and beyond hyperspace and beyodnd the concept of a multi-multiverse containing an infinite number of multiverses there is the conclusion of everything eternally beyond all this, and maybe we cannot search to find a true end to it all because we cannot leave what does not exist and that somehow nothing exists yet throughout nothing somehow the illusion of everything emerges maybe
deanmullen10 1 year ago
2:36 jump in it...and the WHAT ???
fidelmira 1 year ago
boltzmann was a marxist darwinian whos efforts to prove decay inspired and justified the mass genocide of millions of ppl, but because his ideology is so opposite to what is good in life it left him alone and sent him mad !.in nature a poisonous plant has no friends the earth around it is barren just as in life a poisonous idea will eventually be shunned. a frightening thing for a layman to comprehend is that these destructive ideologies are taught to our academics and leaders as truth!
fivedinners 1 year ago
@fivedinners And God inspired genocide as well, whats your point? It just goes to show how misguided we can become.
antonny11 11 months ago
@fivedinners And the mass genocide was influenced by political agendas as much as anything else.
antonny11 11 months ago
@antonny11 Politics and paradigms only exist to distract you from looking for the truth the true reason why we are here on this earth plain which is abundant and there need be no suffering and yet suffering is itself abundant.
fivedinners 11 months ago
@fivedinners Suffering is apart of life buddy, get use to it, face it fool on, that's living my friend not believing in some bull shit fairy take.
antonny11 11 months ago
@antonny11 take it to anger management class or better yet engage your brain past your primitive aggressive tendencies you've been programmed and cannot break out i will say a prayer for you peace love and light!=)
fivedinners 11 months ago
@fivedinners Lol their was no anger in my comment. No need to pray for me my friend. Ill take the good with the bad, because that life.
antonny11 11 months ago
@antonny11 too late i prayed for you =) glad to hear you more cheerful
fivedinners 11 months ago
@fivedinners lol Dam you.
antonny11 11 months ago
@antonny11 love you too! peace my friend =)
fivedinners 11 months ago
@ChaosDynamics
"All nature is art, unknown to thee
All chance direction, which though cans't not see
All discord harmony, not understood..."
Hrimpurstala 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChaosDynamics "you're actually turning this into a religious argument rather than a scientific one."
Isn't that the point of this video series?
It shows the limitation of science and the cracks in its foundations.
To one who would place their ultimate reliance on science that would be a threat.
But what sort of fool would do such a thing...eh?
jonesgerard 1 year ago
Very biased, entropy says things go from order to chaos, but then they say evolution or order and design from randomness is possible. Doesn't even make sense. intricate design cannot come from randomness. Design is evidence of intelligence. Even the most simple cell is very complex if you break it down. In no way can randomness create life. Mathematically it is absurd., yet it is accepted today.
MegaDude1969 1 year ago
@MegaDude1969
Ice crystals develop intricate designs from simpler structures - because the more complex structures are mathematically possible and physics makes them probable as the fluid state is lost.
You are confusing potential energy with order. Entropy states that a system will eventually lose its potential energy. It says nothing about order. A highly ordered system can have no potentially energy just like a disordered system. However, the overall trend towards entropy my increase order.
Hrimpurstala 1 year ago
@MegaDude1969
You really should read a few science books before you try to argue about things that you clearly don't understand.
"entropy says things go from order to chaos"
No it doesn't. Entropy says nothing at all. It is simply a measure of the amount of disorder in a system. You are getting it mixed up with the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy always increases in a closed system. This does no apply to life since it's not a closed system.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 1 year ago 38
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi I agree but how can you be certain that life is not a closed system? Which life are you referring to? Life as we know it, beginning with being born and ending the day we die? Or life after death? Or life before we are born? ..... just asking...
phabbiola 1 year ago
@phabbiola
Biological life is an open system. You eat, drink, take up oxygen, expel waste and loose energy to the environment. Life isn't even remotely a closed system.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 1 year ago 3
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi Hahaa! Well said, sir..straight and to the point
buttlord123 11 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi and what is considered a closed system?
alexialia1 10 months ago
@alexialia1
A closed system is a system where no matter or energy enters or leaves.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 10 months ago
except for the government to citizens; lol @sdrawkcabgnipytmi
CRUSADEwisdom 9 months ago
But it, (entropy)does apply to the universe which is a closed system. Within this universe , we may have open systems which grows with complexity (i.e ecosystems), but this is only because that system is supplied by energy i.e. the Sun. Stars burn out, eventually, and without these energy producing engines, the universe will turn black and eventually, all we will have left is photons bumping around in space. Unfortunately, my friend, it is you who are wrong and they, who are right.
MrAzcension 9 months ago
But it, (entropy)does apply to the universe which is a closed system. Within this universe , we may have open systems which grows with complexity (i.e ecosystems), but this is only because that system is supplied by energy i.e. the Sun. Stars burn out, eventually, and without these energy producing engines, the universe will turn black and eventually, all we will have left is photons bumping around in space. Unfortunately, my friend, it is you who are wrong and they, who are right.
MrAzcension 9 months ago
@MrAzcension
No, actually I am completely right as I was talking about life and not the universe as a whole and the other guy was talking nonsense about how increases in complexity are impossible because of entropy.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 9 months ago
Comment removed
lightmanfilms 7 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi The most people that liked your reply, probably they don't know what the heck you're on about... But because of their ego they clicked that " like"button cause belonging to a crowed it's in human nature. So, are thermodynamics random or our ego? ;)
lightmanfilms 7 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi
I'm familiar with the concept of a closed system only from what I've read about the game theory, so this might no apply, but there are closed systems around us. We create them, and we live in one in many aspects. Only perspective where earth is open system is "sun's perspective". It's just odd to think we only live in open or closed systems, seems to me we live in both.
Sethae 7 months ago
Comment removed
lmos26 6 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi Our bodies are FULL of examples of entropy, ur right though, thinking of entropy in terms of from order to chaos is very narrow, it's true that the process of entropy does lead to change "chaos" but its merely a consequence of entropy, not a definition of what decay is... if you want to understand entropy, simple think of a candle being place outside in direct sunlight "you've just increased the candles entropy" not "entropy made it melt"
lmos26 6 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi can you put entropy in simple terms? entropy is the "waste" heat given up until a system reaches equilibrium?
oriocoookie 6 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi
I wonder a proof that the universe is not a closed system.
fraunhofererlangen 6 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi i guess i should pull the case off my desktop machine so my parts don't break down.
sharewndws 6 months ago
@sharewndws
That makes no sense.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 6 months ago
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi not even I can remember. but stars do burn out. if we don't act soon we won't be able to create a universe to rerun our test of values.
sharewndws 6 months ago
@sharewndws
I wouldn't worry about it.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sdrawkcabgnipytmi you dont know if life is a closed system or not, you dont know if you have free will or not, you dont even know for sure if you exist or not, or if anything youve been taught is true
longfootbuddy 5 months ago in playlist More videos from DorianDawn
whats the math formula for craps nerds?
ad1997 1 year ago
that painting is really scarry. : \
smartmarlino 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@smartmarlino "that painting is really scarry"
hahaha true, its a glimpse of madness....anguish and horror.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@ChaosDynamics
everyone's thought is subjective..! even a darwinist is.. everyone is somehow biased..
amtahboub 1 year ago
@ChaosDynamics
how can material create life? it's material..! This is Darwin's stupidity..! continuing with your hypothesis, death is inevitable.. so the end of the world is inevitable.. just as it started from somewhere it will end...and if the whole universe ends.. there is nothing to continue or regenerate from.. so this ends the cycle.. and there will be no more death.. so death would stop..
Chaos itself is subjective.. it is a name to something we can't understand fully..!
amtahboub 1 year ago
@ChaosDynamics
so death is inevitable.. that's quite.. orderly.. isn't it? everything.. no matter what it is.. how long it stays.. will.. eventually.. collapse..
and answering your comment about quantum mechanics.. what is to us a probability is known with complete certainty to the creator of the universe... the way I see it... everything is ordered even if we can't see it.. but from what we can see.. we have enough to conclude of: our own insignificance.. and the certainty of a creator..
amtahboub 1 year ago
@ChaosDynamics
Prove it, then!
Give me valid proof that I will die..
amtahboub 1 year ago
1+1=2
joseftran 1 year ago
5. After saying this the implication is that CERTAINTY is RELATIVE, in degrees in altering stages regarding knowledge and phenomena. It is provisional during the evolution process, changing alternately, periodically at different times regarding "understanding-processes". Certainty does NOT HAVE to be an absolute. It's not necessary. Therefore I leave the question about the ultimate goal of consciousness ASIDE. Defining the "nature" of the problem is already half-way to "CERTAINTY" - ENOUGH.
kosalet 1 year ago
4. Besides, "FLEXIBILITY" just GOT to be there, if only in the name of CREATIVITY. EVEN in the SCIENCE there is a "creative" element not widely acknowledged. PROGRESS would be IMPOSSIBLE without POSSIBILITY for pondering, accepting or rejecting, not to mention "moods", emotions and so on. UNCERTAINTY "creates", allows internal - external RECIPROCAL EFFECT - "SPACE" where the "TO BECOME TO UNDERSTAND" - PHENOMENA "happens".
kosalet 1 year ago
3. From the ABSOLUTE "certainty's" point of view even the uncertain IS CERTAIN. Uncertainty HAS to be RETAINED in ORDER to GET TO KNOW the "NATURE" of "certainty" in it's various, diverse degrees regarding phenomenas in the "life"-process. If there would be NO consciousness, NO observer, NO thinker, NO experiencer , No mind ( mind is related to uncertainty ) THEN - WHERE WOULD BE the NEED for "CERTAINTY"?
kosalet 1 year ago
Thoughts, movements etc - as WE know them, are possible BECAUSE of the UNCERTAINTY, NOT because of certainty. Our "Life" is an uncertainty - "FUNAMBULIST" - process to get to KNOW certain - FOREVER.
kosalet 1 year ago
Nothing is absolutely CERTAIN from the relative, limited consciousnesses point of view. Finally, ultimately, absolutely "EVERYTHING" ( so to say ) is "certain". DEFINITE certainty IMPEDES carrying out a RELATIVELY free WILL. Deeper meaning of our "emergency" ( if you don't mind me saying so ) is to BECOME to UNDERSTAND. This process is called "LIFE".
kosalet 1 year ago
Boltzmann was mistaken to believe God can not determine outcomes because of thermodynamics. Quantum mechanical events require a complementarity field. God's omnipresence enables Him to set the conditions that determine events that are uncertain from our perspective. Eventually BBC's celebration of godlessness will come down upon their heads.
seanmPWH 1 year ago
@seanmPWH omnipresence, huh? Is he omnipotent too? I find it humourous that people feel the need to explain everything they don't understand with the great mental panacea - god. Oh widddums, does it scare you that there is stuff too big, too small and too unpredictable for your brain to comprehend?
Digdigs2 1 year ago
@Digdigs2 Yeah...the false dichotomy falacy.
Woland440 1 year ago
@Digdigs2
It's a false dichotemy....believers have been falling for it forever.
Woland440 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Digdigs2 "does it scare you that there is stuff too big, too small and too unpredictable for your brain to comprehend? "
Like God for you ?
jonesgerard 1 year ago
Comment removed
ev8lol 1 year ago
Comment removed
ev8lol 1 year ago
Comment removed
ev8lol 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Digdigs2 bullying is bullying, whether you're right or wrong.
ev8lol 1 year ago
@seanmPWH I see the attraction of Bohr - a duality, a certainty... although the duality relation doesn't totally square up. Bohr's theory needs some work, there is still something we have yet to figure out. Oh no! An uncertainty! Quick, fill it with god!
Digdigs2 1 year ago
what's so irreligious about entropy? i idon't c anything dangerous about the idea
farouqnimer 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@farouqnimer
Its just BBC anti Christian propaganda... You learn to ignore it.
TaqiyyaExposer 1 year ago
@shazzbot007 god exists cus of ppl and their beleives.
Ju1ceem4n 1 year ago
here's my theory - you little bitches keep bitching about the protection of law for the criminal and you forget about the victim.
tubxyoob 1 year ago
@shazzbot007 Continue your reasoning to its conclusion and you'll find its just silliness at its core. Your ego is making you act a fool.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
The title of that show is a bit misleading. Their discoveries were not dangerous. What was dangerous was the hostility of the scientific community of their time.
anarkoFred 1 year ago
@anarkoFred I agree a lot fo their problem was related to peer pressure , but what they uncovered is still here and many scientists ignore it.
Set theory cannot be resolved and that places all rigorous math on loose footing.
In fact , the closer you look the worse it gets. Watch any of Greg Chaitins videos, he picks up where Turing left off and ...it gets a lot worse for rigorous math and physics. /watch?v=svzGGHdqst8
jonesgerard 1 year ago
what is the purpose for knowing these things? looks like they got so obsess with wanting to know those things that somehow in the process they sold their souls to the devil so they can know it....
our purpose is to walk in the Way of Yahweh...and that will get us from point a to point b...
YAHWEHisperfect 1 year ago
@YAHWEHisperfect how do you know Yahweh didn't plan their destinies in such a matter?All of them were religious people(well except the last one)and thus had some kind of faith that God was guiding their paths.If man was made in the image and the likeness of God,then doesn't that mean that we are also creators?That we must make something,anything in this inferior reality,in order to be closer to our God offered purpose?Also,one must sacrifice for one's creation,what's the point to getting to "b"?
Raluk54 1 year ago
Creepy painting. I wonder what the title is.
CerebrateHyatt 1 year ago
@CerebrateHyatt "Philosophy" by Gustav Klimt :)
leilei4 1 year ago
@CerebrateHyatt uh...the ceiling ?
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@shazzbot007
The easter bunny seems to exist only in the minds of those who place their ultimate reliance on science and science is of man, man will always fail you.
Science is fallible.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@jonesgerard And what has the converse provided us with? Has His invisible hand fed us or clothed us or cured our diseases? While man may be fallible, at least its very best and altruistic are working for the benefit of our species.
kinxectic 1 year ago
@kinxectic My perspective is God gave you hands to work with and a brain to use.
God never does for us what we can do for ourself.
Your concept of God betrays you, maybe you need a different concept because the one you hold doesn't work .
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@jonesgerard Isn't it our parents who gave us brains and the hands? And if even so, then do we need a God in the first place?
What is He to do if what we can do, we can do ourselves? Provide us with a place to go to after we die? Nepenthe for our sorrows? Inspiration for our works?All three that i have mentioned, can be also be applied to whatever caricature of your fancy - a Guardian Angel, a talking pink unicorn. And why "God" specifically? Why not Thor or Yahweh or the Greek Pantheon?
kinxectic 1 year ago
@kinxectic People call upon God when they run into something they cannot defeat, try drug addiction. The reason for God specifically is thats the only concept that works when all our clever ideas fail. But the God idea works and it works very fast.
If I were looking for evidence for God I would be looking among the dregs of society, not under a microscpe. They live under bridges.
If you're ever around Boston I can show you.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@jonesgerard Late reply. The capacity to provide relief is not a piece of convincing evidence for Christian existentialism, because there are many substitutes even more implausible than God that could provide the exact conceivable repose. Like a child's imaginary friend to comfort him during a storm - but does it exist? Hence, I find your statements quite patronizing, that never mind that God doesn't exist, so long as He is able to provide comfort, and that's all that matters.
kinxectic 1 year ago
@kinxectic I said it was evidence of God working in peoples lives, nothing about Christian anything at all. The results speak for themselves.
" there are many substitutes even more implausible than God that could provide the exact conceivable repose"
Name one that is endorsed by the national council for alcoholism and addiction.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@kinxectic - But how can we know that a child's imaginary friend does not exist? By definition, does this friend not exist, at the least, within the child's imagination? (Just enjoying turning ideas around to see the light sparkle within them.)
Jefferdaughter 1 year ago
@kinxectic
If you have a pair of oxen and one is sick and the other is healthy, which one do you work? Of course you work the healthy one and care for the sick; so that it may too become healthy again.
Also, more things are important in life than materialistic possession. The laws laid in the Ten Commandments (like do not kill) fill us in our minds, spiritually. To care for other people and indeed turn the other cheek. God has apetised me, at least, mentally. Where I seek to be fed.
noionxion 1 year ago
@noionxion I applaud you for being able to see the good of religion, and has applied its better tenets for the benefit of your life. Sadly, those financially well endowed and with great political power do not see religion as you do, but only ostentatiously so, using faith for their own means, supported by theology no less. Like Reformation or Dominion theology.
Also, for every positive aspect of Christianity you cited, there will always be a negative aspect. How does one distinguish?
kinxectic 1 year ago
@noionxion Continued: But by one's own judgment, that is always skewered towards the good of our fellow man. Yes i know, human judgment is fallacious, but, being a humanist, I believe in the power of man to alleviate himself from material and spiritual poverty. For instance, Romans 13:1-5 indicated that Christianity supported slavery, as did 1 Peter 2:18, and Titus 3:1. Yet conversely, there were verses that condemned slavery as the first epistle to Timothy showed.
kinxectic 1 year ago
@noionxion Continued: this moral ambiguity was finally resolved after a good 1700 years. You see, Christianity has not been an entirely spotless track record when it comes to morality - more often than not, a majority of believers simply submitted to the moral ethos of the day like burning witches, or joining crusades. As the Buddha was attributed to saying, "Believe nothing even if I had said it...only believe if it follows your own reasoning and common sense".
kinxectic 1 year ago
@kinxectic Going to start by saying thanks for the truly lovely reply. One thing that people fail to understand is that these books were written for a time that these ideas were acceptable. Slavery was publicly used by the Romans and it helped them build their empire.
I'm not saying slavery is a good thing, just saying we must understand the time for when such ideas were not only plausible but normal.
noionxion 1 year ago
@noionxion Expecting an atheist to see the facts in context is a fruitless expectation.
Content without context is a pretext for a textproof.
Thats exactly what they do, pull a verse , take it completely out of its conext then claim its evil. They don't notice the slight of mind their ego pulls on them.
Been there, I was like that.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@jonesgerard That's what some but not all people do.
noionxion 1 year ago
@kinxectic Also, there will always be a mindless flock of people who act without thought. Take for example the sighting of the Mosque near ground zero, the way people reacted to this and didn't want it built there was purely disgusting in my opinion.
Back on topic, I'm not saying follow anything without thought. These ideals have been around for many years and many still hold to have great ideals!
noionxion 1 year ago
@kinxectic I look at these ideals as just massive metaphors. Do I honestly believe God created the world in 7 days? No. But the ideas held in there are great. They should be a humanitarians greatest relief. That thousands of years ago people were saying not to seek revenge, that materials are nought to the mind, that charity is good and that sharing the wealth and caring for the poor person is what is not only expected, but is the responsibility of those who can do it.
Looking forward reply :)
noionxion 1 year ago
@noionxion At its core the bible is saying sanity is this way.
It has proven so for me.
Atheists always trot out the OT and the vengefull God.
I wouldn't believe in their concept of God either.
It never dawns on them that its called OLD for a reason, they could have called it the previous testament.
Atheists ought not venture into the bible, its too confusing for them.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
the proponents of change and uncertainty
will always have the last say
so much seems*
certain
*) IS
!!!
TheRavingRandomist 1 year ago
For exampel, i am still to see an intelligent anti-darvinist being truly convinced of the purely logical superiority of their arguments. One will always have the feel, here is one who thinks/feels it preferable to defend old (and tried) lies/inventions/conventions against uneasy (or potentially dangerous) truths. And there is allways the real danger (well, it's rather common rule) that scientific "truths" will morph into monsterous/deformed clones in the broader political/public arena...
TheRavingRandomist 1 year ago
"Times when people felt that new ideas could upset society's FRAGILE structure"...?
So, where was here a deep rooted believe in the God-given-ness of the prevailing order of *things*?
As if decay and change were not a universal (fearful) human experience through all times! And the only sane option we have is to intentfully and knowingly cloak us in (varying degrees) from the most stark aspects of the human condition...
TheRavingRandomist 1 year ago
@shazzbot007
GOD is your consciousness, "I am who I am".
So if you mean that you can't grasp science, you can't because of your ignorance.
deshadower 1 year ago
Scary Painting
kannabhais 1 year ago
This is so interesting.Great video!
trudunneism 1 year ago
@shazzbot007
Haha at first all I could see was up to when you said Science.
Then I scrolled down and realized why you had 5 thumbs up LOL
Assaultpredator 1 year ago
@shazzbot007
Childish , does embracing science as your God limit the mind to that of pre-puberty.?
I think so because its very evident.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
just drop some L and everything makes sense...
Free4801 1 year ago
Who says that God cannot be change (Ok, the bible says that He is the same always and forever, but so is change)? When a new discovery comes along in science, people doubt the existence of God. Science can shed some light on Who God is every time there is a new discovery. Why do they have to be opposites or cancel each other? I love science because it makes me think and ponder about God.
hswoc 1 year ago
@shazzbot007
dude that's harsh for the Easter bunny, remember all those chocolate eggs, where they come from??? checkmate :P
johnny1893 1 year ago
the only constant is change
Paddyllfixit 1 year ago
I hate how the creators of this program attempt to spin these stories in a political light. I just don't believe that Boltzmann's theories on statistical mechanics had such a profound effect on political thought. The political impact is really exaggerated in this video.
angela1894 1 year ago
@shazzbot007
"God existence resides outside the realm of Science.
So does the Easter Bunny. "
So do a lot of things, unless you think science can quantify love.?
A bit of God given common sense goes a long way preventing us from making idiots of ourselves.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@jonesgerard To what god are you referring, there are thousands...the hubris of your statement is self-evident
emiljanowicz 1 year ago
@emiljanowicz
In monotheism there is only one God.
Otherwise I would have typed god's.
A bit of God given common sense would have told you that too.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@jonesgerard There are thousands of gods for you to choose from in human history...thousands of religions... as I said before... the hubris of your statement is self-evident... get educated
emiljanowicz 1 year ago 2
@emiljanowicz
How much education does it take to acheive zero common sense.?
Its perfectly ok not to beleive in God,
I wouldn't beleieve in your God either.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@emiljanowicz but there is indeed one God, one creator, only one. With more than one, there would be disorder as they would fight. With no God, there would be nothing, no particle to blast in the big bang, no order of particles to make atoms, then cells, then organisms.
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub How do you know they would fight?
Elentaurel 1 year ago
@amtahboub LOL...and let me guess its allah?!? Islam is a plagerized religion of oppression.
emiljanowicz 1 year ago
@emiljanowicz
It is God..! Allah = God in Arabic.. Arab Christians and Jews say Allah..!
Instead of calling religions with such labels.. I would recommend you open a book and read about Islam. The best book to learn what more than a billion people around the world believe in, is the Quran, there are English translations.. It's about 600 pages.. read it and then tell me if you still think that.. :)
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub I have read the quran and it disgusts me deeply. its presented as the final, un-alterable, word of god...which means it cannot be changed or criticized, its all you need. its pure barbaric nonsence that degrads women and is the root cause of so much hatred in the world today...its also historically plagerized from earlier religions.
emiljanowicz 1 year ago
@emiljanowicz
I doubt your honesty, I think you have just read this biased description somewhere.
It is very rude and inconsiderate calling the religion of more than 1.5 billion people around the world with such names. The media where you come from has made it sound OK to call such names to my glorious religion. Can you say the same inappropriate comments about jews or judaism? Anyway.. It is one God only and it is One religion... Moses, Jesus, Mohammad, Abraham all present Gods only religion.
amtahboub 1 year ago
@emiljanowicz
The Qur'an also states that fresh water and salt water can't be mixed: (Sura 25:53).
"He is the One who merges the two seas; one is fresh and palatable, while the other is salty and undrinkable. And He separated them with a formidable, inviolable barrier (evaporation)"
Real scientific truths there, right?
Draugh39 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Draugh39 "The Qur'an also states that fresh water and salt water can't be mixed"
I'm not a muslim but this is a metaphor for mixing good and evil thoughts, you can try but evil will win if you persist. Its a take on the garden of evil and eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil.
jonesgerard 1 year ago
@amtahboub You guys should stop with this god-allah my religion is better discussion , or else someone is going to declare hole jihad against the other person. Cut it out ! Discuss the subject of the video clip, not some dumb unrelated topic.
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
Respond to this video...
My discussion is not about religions. This is what the ignorant guys are trying to make it become. My point was merely that more scientific discoveries prove the existence of a creator of the universe..
I am really trying to be scientific.. But Islamophobes are everywhere..
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub A great man once sed I AM A SMART MAN... BUTT I DON'T KNOW WHUT LOVE IS...
Something you've said or posted somewhere must have tipped off your phobic fans that you are Islamic. Perhaps it is time for you to remove the "Kick Me" sign taped to the back of your shirt...
DancingSpiderman 1 year ago
@DancingSpiderman
Lol..! That is what they call, blame the victim! I do not have to hide my opinion or religion from anywhere on youtube to avoid phobics! It's their problem not mine..! This is like asking a jew to hide the fact that he is one under Hitler's rule! very wrong approach!
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub Are you even watching the video? The whole video explains how these men completely turned mathematics and physic on its head. Physics was once proof of a creator because everything was ordered and has his place. We know now this is not true. So how does that prove a creator?
antonny11 11 months ago
@amtahboub - mankind has had multiple gods for far longer than it has had just one. Some cultures still have multiple gods and yet we all still exist. Polytheistic societies also created civilisation, science, etc. quite some time before the idea of a single god. So your ideas are, quite simply, incorrect. Aside from the fact that all gods or a god are an invention of the human imagination, created solely to explain gaps in our knowledge until we rationalised the world more effectively.
functio1 1 year ago
@functio1
So... Humans created God? Hmm.. But who created Humans then? Oh and.. the very orderly universe, I wonder..? Is it chance? can chaos result in something of extreme order? By chance? If coincidence was able to make an organism so sophisticated like humans.. why did it not make.. say.. an electrical motor.. or.. a PC! I think a human is a much more complicated thing for a coincidence to make it..!
Mankind had ONE God since God created the first man..!
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub If the universe were any other way, you'd think it's just as "extremely ordered" as it is now.
TheKingdomofErnor 1 year ago
@TheKingdomofErnor
If the electrons didn't spin around the nucleus and around themselves, the same way the planets spin around their suns and themselves, and if the human eye did not have two kinds of receptors, one for light intensity and the other measuring wavelength (color), if the water of the rivers and the seas was mixed.. then i would not see any extreme order..!
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub Yes you would. You think there is "extreme order" because this is the universe you were born into. It doesn't matter how it ended up, as long as it could support life, it allowed you to occur, and for you to have illogical thoughts.
TheKingdomofErnor 1 year ago
@TheKingdomofErnor
What is illogical is to make a hypothesis not based on anything scientific and trying to force it on others, and calling other thought illogical..
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub I haven't made a hypothesis, and calling you illogical is not in itself illogical, because you are, in fact, illogical. You believe that the universe is particularly ordered just because you were born into this universe and not a different one. It's like being proud of the country you're born in for no reason other than being born there. The only difference is that you think there's some actual physical significance to the universe you were born in. It's illogical.
TheKingdomofErnor 1 year ago
@TheKingdomofErnor
Well, you can't actually prove your point. You cannot prove me wrong. Also, logical or not depends or the level of knowledge you have. It is illogical to have black clouds for two days without it raining, for an average person, but it is logical for someone who studies meteorology and knows why. To you I am illogical because you are incapable (willingly) to understand. It is illogical for someone in the year 800 to say that there are things called EM waves..! but now we know.
amtahboub 1 year ago
@amtahboub You don't seem to know what "logical" means.
TheKingdomofErnor 1 year ago