ハリアー垂直離陸

[roppap]

無理にジェット噴射しなくてもへりの伸縮式回転翼がでるようにす­­ればいいんだね。できなければへりで持ち上げジェット噴射すれ­ば飛べるんだね。

[hugoalberto2010]

no entiendo nada

saludos

[111snakeeater]

この時のエンジン音やばかったよw

うるさすぎて気を失うかと思ったww

[foxhound712]

＠９６０６２２１さん

スイッチの数は約３０だそうです

スイッチの数が多すぎて戦死よか操縦ミスでの死亡率が高いですｗ



[9606221]

これってかなりのスイッチのきりかえあるらしい

100とかいくんじゃない？スイッチの数

[11MarioSuper]

かっこい～～～

[se1615]

燃費が知りたい！俺の原付の燃料分しか積めなかったらどの時点で­落ちるんだろう。。

[0227903aa]

今年は地震の影響でないんですよね。。。

楽しみにしてたのに

[veyania]

ESTOY DEACUERDO CON TODOS SUS COMENTARIO..SI Q SI

[luckystrike432]

フォークランド紛争にてイギリス軍を勝利に導いた立役者であるの­は事実。

スラストの方向転換にて急旋回、急上昇をして敵の後ろにつける機­動力は、

亜音速機でも十分に戦闘力があることを証明している。

MIG25に易々と侵入を許した日本にとって滑走路が爆撃された­とき生き残りを賭けて戦うのにはうってつけの飛行機ではないでし­ょうか。

あのとき頭上を旋回するMIG25を見あげて神に祈ったことを今­でも思い出します。

現用機の中では一番好きな飛行機です。

[Milepoch]

ベクタースラストの極致。F-22もえげつない離陸するけどハリ­アーには負ける。

[mamorumonhan]

確実に地球に優しくない兵器として名が上がるな。

別に嫌いじゃないけど・・・

[ATAGWOL]

熱感知式ミサイルの格好の的。

事実、被弾した場合致命傷になる可能性が高い。

[matakichi79]

これ通勤用に使えんかな？滑走路いらんし。(笑)

[XxxSakura101]

It was/is a very good aircraft, unfortunately is would be very outclassed if it came up against a traditional fighter. That is why we all had to pitch in and make the F-35, it is a match for any modern fighter, while retaining the ability to take off vertically.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 if you think the F35 is a match for the latest mig and sukhoi variants then you need to get up to speed. The F 35 is a dog, with fleas. Raptor is also light years ahead

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmatian The "latest" mig is the 1983 Mig-29 Fulcrum, somthing comparable to the F16- somthing the F35 will be replacing. The Mig 29 isn't even stealth, while the F35 is in the 3rd generation of stealth aircraft. After 30 years the Russians finally managed to produce the PAK after copying the F22, but it won't be in use until 2020- assuming budget cuts don't interfere.

The F22 is older than the F35..The F35 isn't even out yet..and it's a MRF, not air superiority.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 Yes the raptor is older - the F35 isn't out of bed yet because it is sick and will never get better. It is over time over budget and not competitive. If you think the latest jets from Russia are 1983 versions then why am I even replying to you?

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation @dalmatian No not the "latest jet aircraft" you said the latest MIG and Sukhoi, the last aircraft that Mikoyan developted and the Russian airforce put into service was the Mig-29 in 1983- the newest Russian aircraft that was built in any real number.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 well come on how do the latest sukhois stand up against this so called stealth turkey?

[dalmanation]

@dalmanation Since the F35 is not out there doing it's thing in the real world- I don't think anyone knows for sure but survivability of the F35 will be nowhere near as good as the F22. You don't like to hear that but I believe it. And what is CAS ? with regard to stealth? you have the acronyms but what does it all mean

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation The SR-71 was the first generation of stealth aircraft, with the 2nd generation including the B2, and F117, the later of which has been retired and pulled form service. 3rd generation stealth aircraft list the F22 and F35 as part of it's ranks.

Stealth allows an aircraft to close on radar to a shorter distance before it's detected. Originally, the F22 was undetectable at any distance by NATO radar installations and achieving

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation a 108:0 kill rate against the F-15c in operation Northern edge, an aircraft who has already fought the Mig 29 and killed it over Serbia, and who has the best combat record of all time.

This means the F35 will be able to suffer far fewer loses due to ground fire (if any at all) during CAS missions (or any tactical bombardment for that mater)

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation as it will be very difficult for ground radar to gain a lock on. In contrast the Mig 29 is a large target, has high unmasked energy output, and has no RAM of it's own, meaning it's far more vulnerable to radar.

But again, why are you comparing the Mig 29 to the F35? One is an interceptor, the other is a MRF. Not that the F35 would find it difficult to kill the Mig 29.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation How do you figure the F35 has a lower survivability rate? It may be in the same generation as the F22, but technically it uses material and techniques in it's design that is 10 years newer- and as it was joint developted with the EU has many tech advantages that the F22 dose not incorporate.

Again, i ask why you mock the F35? You have not presented any realistic reason behind this accusation.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 did you have a read of the hyperlink I sent you by Dr Kopp. This is my reason for doubting the hyped up survivability of the F35. Thank you for explaining some new points to me and debating without being abusive. I appreciate this from you. I am just disappointed that my home country is investing in the F35. Our tactical needs are specific to our geography (huge) and I am simply sceptical when so much negative media about the F35 exists from the States.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation @dalmation No i don't confuse the word, serviceable means it's ready for service, and in service means it's in service.. The Mig-35 is still in it's test phases and really only makes the modifications to the Mig-29 an official variant. The Mig 29 and Mig35 share everything except cockpit layout, electronic countermeasures, and engines. It's really the same aircraft, just modernized- as was the T55 and T72, and T90.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation It still requires testing as it dose have a new engine and cockpit layout that is proving problematic to test pilots who have found it underpowered when armaments are added. The F-22 was developted in the 1990s and finalized in the early 2000s, while the F35 was developted in the Early 2000s, and will be finalized in the 2010s. How do you imagine it's stealth capabilities lack in comparison to the F22?

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation It uses the same material that was available to the F22, but has had 10 additional years of stealth development and European partners, advantages that where not available during the YF program that used US only personal.

Generations have nothing to do with how good an aircraft or vehicle is to it's classmates,

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation "Stealth generation" was somthing coined by the Nighthawk that has been applied to US and later non-US stealth designs. For example, the F35 is considered 3rd generation stealth, but a 5th generation aircraft, as is the F22.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation What hyper link? I know a bit about Carlo Kopp, he is a fierce critic of the F117 and F35 ever since a design overlook was found and caused the F-117 to become visible when it's bombay doors where opened- somthing the F22 made a publicly stated point to correct.

Apparently him and Davis had a spat where Davis accused him of having an economical and political agenda.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation Kopp was correct that the F35 would lose a dogfight to the F22, but he is out of his mind to compare the two aircraft in such a way. It is the equivalent of comparing the Stuka to the 109, they are two different aircraft designed for two different missions. One is a multi-role fighter, the other is tasked with air superiority.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation While the F35 can and will engage in air-to-air combat, it's primary mission is the elimination of enemy ground defences and the support of friendly ground forces with CAS missions. The F-22 on the other hand is built to gain and maintain air superiority, it is a one trick pony that isn't good for much besides controlling the sky. While the F35 can take off vertically, from short strips, and can fill any role it's given.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation It's also much less expensive and countries who want to purchase a stealth aircraft may decide to replace it's entire line of career and land based fixed wing aircraft with the F-35, rather than buying 100 F22s who can only be used for air-combat roles. It's a very good aircraft that outperforms the F22 in every way but the issues relating to air to air combat.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmation Though not to be confused by taking it to mean it lacks air-to-air performance, it still outperforms most fighter and interceptors aircraft as para-examined by it's performance against the F-18 super hornet.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation Not competitive? With who? There are no competitors for 3rd generation CAS stealth aircraft, further how would you know if it was or was not competitive? Do you know it's specifications? Because i'd love to hear how you got ahold of classified information like that.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 You seem to have the F22 and the JSF mixed up. The JSF is a long way short of the F22.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmatian And no, i am not "mixing up" the F22 and F35. generation 1.5 stealth? There was no such thing. Perhaps you should understand the differences of the two aircraft, the F35 is a MRF, while the F22 is an air superiority fighter. Two completely different roles, with two completely different mission priorities and thus specs.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 OK my knowledge base on this topic is obviously less than yours. I will now say that the F35 is generation 2.5 stealth. To think the radar avoiding capability of the F35 is on par with the F22 is wrong and if you want to call them the same generation then one is an adult and the other a child.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation If you look at Russian designs you will see they seldom come up with new models, but adore updating the same ones over and over again. It's economically cheaper to do so, but you will still keep the same problems that are hard coded into it. The Mig-35 is no different, and even moreso that it's not necessarily an upgrade so much as an official model number to existing Mig29 modifications.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation it's only a mark of what year it was developted and entered service. For example, the Leopard2, M1, Challenge 2, and T-90 are all 3rd generation MBTs yet the Leopard2 is clearly superior to the T-90 in most ways.

You may be confused with stealth generation and aircraft generation. Aircraft, stealth or not typically go by aircraft generation dating.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmatian Why compare it to Russian aircraft? Everyone knows their designs are subpare compared to developted nations like Germany, the US, and Japan.

If you want to talk 'competition' lets look YAk's designs, the Russian aircraft that can take off vertically- oh wait thats right there are none anymore. The Yak-38 was retired and no replacement could be afforded. Well lets look at Russian stealth aircraft, hmm can't find any in service.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 why are you so hung up on VTOL STOL when there are heaps of runways and carrier craft to support conventional take off. What is subpare? The Russians correctly assessed VTOL is a gimmick with little real application. How about looking at Russian radar that can beat the JSF poor radar profile design at certain angles and the Russian missiles that will then shoot the JSF down - uh oh didn't think of that one

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmatian The only thing resembling a stealth design is the Russian F22 clone- the PAK, designed from stolen secrets from when Russia and China hacked into the pentagon during the YF program. But again..not in service- and it won't be for another 15 years, assuming everyone goes according to plan for the Russian airforce.

So again, what competitors? Last i looked everyone wants to buy the F35.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 Su35S will be kitted out to kill F35s( when they finally get finished). Technique and strategy will overcome the design faults that render the F35 only partially stealthy. The rest of the platform simply cannot compete.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 the latest Mig is the Mig35 Fulcrum - admittedly only 10 have been made and sales have not been secured. Truly the F35 is only about 1.5 generations of stealth.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmatian The Mig 35 is not a serviceable aircraft, as only prototypes and test aircraft have been manufactured. It's already been announced it's the updated export version of the Mig-29 aimed at India, who have already declined purchase in favor of the F16 and F18 super hornet, while requesting access to the F35.

Hence Russia has discontinued plans for it, and reverted it back to it's testing phase, only replacing models lost to exercises.

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 you confuse the word serviceable and in service.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmanation The F35 has just as good- if not better stealth capabilities, but compared to the F22 it's dogfighting ability lacks. The F35 was designed to replace the F16, and F18 while the F22 was designed to replace the F15. If thats what you're getting at then i completely agree, but i wouldn't call it survivability, but rather dog fighting capacity.

[XxxSakura101]

@dalmatian Who has no equal on Earth, i mean really name me a V/STOL aircraft that has a 3rd generation stealth design, supercruise, a similar payload, or anything remotely comparative. Everyone wants this aircraft, with 11 countries already having bought them, and 9 more requesting the right to purchase the F35- how can it be anything less than magnificent?

By the way,,the correct term is "turkey" not "dog". A dog isn't a bird..

[dalmanation]

@XxxSakura101 Ok the F 35 is a turkey with fleas. You are right a dog isn't a bird and a dog can't fly - unless it was an early astronaut.

[MYOMINPO]

とうとう家庭に一台戦闘機だな。



[nekonitts]

うるせぇ(((゜д゜;)))

近所迷惑だ

[mat704]

Holy crap.

Do u suck?

[TAKADON2001]

実戦では速さより小回りの利く戦闘機の方が有利と聞きました。

ﾌｫｰｸﾗﾝﾄﾞ紛争で威力を発揮したとか。

[displayeye]

俺もこうやって飛び去りたい

[raika2200]

@displayeye

wwwwwwww



[ichiko813813]

ｵｵｵｵｯ!!(ﾉﾟдﾟ)ﾉ ｵｵｵｵｫｫｫｫｫｫｫｰ

すごいなぁ。。。

[buitanful]

かちょえ～～

こんなん相手にしたらあかんよ。

[iceman333100]

das ist ein harrier

[rayandrestamarasaez]

Es un Monstruo contaminante

[mundohistorias]

saludos

[Ghill3man]

Weak VTO. The angle was less than 30 degrees, lets see some 70 degree plus VTOs and then they will be YouTube worthy

[Enderwiggan1]

Completely pointless plane - well dont England

[keowaz2]

love harreiers. ENGLISH PLANE!!WOOT!

I also love this vid more because it was posted on my b day last year! w00t

[ScatmanFASTairsoft]

its so nice when a harrier is stat

[arutohimexkiraxtu]

ハリアーは対艦攻撃用なんですかねぇ

[SASAMU201]

戦闘能力は低い

[crimson0427]

そんなのはフォークランド紛争以前の古い理論的な話。知ったか乙­

[MEGAtoaster1]

uh english

[bingo650202]

老飛機

[kurokosyou08]

ジェットスクラム飛行だっけ

[fatboy69s]

fabulous. something else that the americans did not invent or perfect. although no doubt that in years to come they will re-write history & take the credit.

[stlcards32]

yea those americans havent invented anything. they only invented the airplane, tv, computer, sewing machine, and lightbulb. i mean, when do people ever use that stuff right?

[bubbles867]

Wow sewing machine , WOW! , Scottish invented the TV and the British military invented the computer in WW2 , get your facts right unless you wanna view the stats at who invented most Brits or US?

[Vashed555]

Personal Computer: Steve Wozniak

Light Bulb: Thomas Edison

Printed Circuit: Texas Instruments, Fairchild Semi

Transistor: John Bardeen

Calculator: IBM 1954

Television: Philo Farnsworth 1927 (look it up)

Telegraph, Artificial Heart, Numerous advances in medicine, (ie Jonas Salk)... I'm not here to get into a pissing match, but really, give some credit to where it's due. Both countries invented great things, but the US had more money to invest in the future.

[bubbles867]

Firstly the computer is not a proper computer , the first proper one wa developed by the British in WW2 , secondly , you honestly think the TV was made by Philo Farnsworth? Plus where do yuo think all the vaccines come from? let me tell you a little place called porton down, UK

[JarfJam]

I thought the English invented the computer.

[qwertdr]

We did.

[lexlov250]

lol that was funny man

[EuroTrash1138]

yea, vertical take off and landing = range of under 70 miles, impressive, don't you agree... rofl

[mjonausk]

When you can park your planes 10miles from the frontline. And support the aircraft out of the back of a truck. It is a great help.

Have an aircraft on an airfield and it is easier to attack.

[minamihiroaki]

カッコよすぎるやろ・・・

[trommelbiel]

This is sooooooooo wonderful. when will commercial planes take off that way.

[tomcat4889]

すごいですね！

よくあの重たい機体が上がりますよね！

私の好きな戦闘機の1つです。

これからもこのような動画

宜しくお願いします。

[andreasdu1]

wer will den schon dein pupsi.. vielleicht dein freund/freundin ..... poste mal lieber ein paar links von deinen supersounds...aber nicht in malzeichen (運)

[Chigsterminator]

Man leute wenn ihr bei einem Start eines Harriers schon wow ruft solltet ihr mal hören wenn ich einen 12 - sekündigen Furz ablasse, der 4 mal die Tonart ändert und den Hund nötigt den Raum zu verlassen. Es gibt doch viel besseres als nen alten Harrier. Z.B. nen F22 Raptor Stealthjet oder nen B - 52 Bomber oder nen SR 71 Blackbird oder einen AH64 Apache Longboe Kampfhelikopter oder die fette Energia Trägerrakete der Russen, die euch 100 Tonnen Nutzlast voll in den Arsch schieben kann.

[UBootStefan]

Darauf stehste wa? Ne richtig schöne große Rakete im Arsch ;)

[CHUN707]

すごいなー。

でもずっとホバリングしてると３０秒で燃料なくなるって話。運用­には気ぃ使うだろなー。

[tridung12]

着地でもおんなじことできんのかな？

[andreasdu1]

WOW give me more

[bolka777]

It is designed in Britain, but AV-8B is an upgraded american version made in the US

[zucoy21z89]

All Harrier engines are made by Rolls Royce UK.

[igomarron]

@zucoy21z89

Pegasus 2

[fx1236]

헉 문어2마리가 공중부향해서 슝 가버렸네여

[fx1236]

낙지도 같이 슝 사라졌네여 ㅋㅋㅋ

[allen1234509]

yea u chinkys better be scard thats comin for u bitch

[mccarthy155]

you idoit

[pen238]

一ヶ月間、無料でレンタルしてくれないかな？もちろん、操縦士付­きで‥‥。

[colt8583]

猛烈に燃料を食い、開発費を回収できないほどコストが掛かってい­る。

現代戦に利用するには巨額すぎる価格・・・・日本には要らない。­

[kerupu1]

@colt8583 でも燃費が良ければ、空母を作る予算の無い日本にはちょうどいい­艦載機として運用できるだろう

[huuDORA]

凄い...画期的。

[masaaasasasa]

凄い技術だな

[qupubon]

so cool!

[mgvr6]

If you see the guys other video of the Harrier, you can clearly tell the USMC markings on it. So we can come to the conclusion that this one is indeed a McDonnel Douglas built AV-8B and not a BAE Harrier II.

[josephkennith]

wat are those squares 4?

[konzertnr9]

OK, I agree that Harrier was originally developed by British. I just wanted to point out that the one in the video shall be an American version owend by US marines.

[TheMightOfTheEnglish]

its a british harrier

[konzertnr9]

Since the video's taken in Iwakuni (Japan), I'm afraid it's not.

[TheMightOfTheEnglish]

ok , its a japanese owned ,british/american harrier

[konzertnr9]

They doesn't own Harrier...

[TheMightOfTheEnglish]

the harrier is a british invention,they invented the VTOL when others failed, then sold it to america,who make their own version , the VTOL capability is now if the new joint strike aircraft the americans are building

[kamihairu]

グラセフのhydra

[82GENA]

これ車載エンジンにつかえば渋滞の時とか便利じゃね？

[aliwfeyvcloa]

ｗ周りの車超迷惑ｗ

[tetsuya5234GRASPER]

それにしてもこのハリアー、爆音である

[shoo65337]

まさに『コンビニ行ってくる』である

[penginweb]

こんなジェット、一家に一台欲しいですね。畑から出陣できそう。­

[TekeTekeElekiman]

　畑から出陣できそう･･･とのことですが、実際このＶ－ＴＯＬ垂­直離着陸ハリアー攻撃機は、ベトナム戦争時の泥濘地など、滑走路­が確保できない所でも離着陸できるように開発されたらしいですよ­。なお、このハリアー攻撃機のエンジン、なんとロールスロイス製­だそうです。知ってました？

[go326]

ハリアーの後継のＦ３５のＶＴＯＬ用エンジンもロールスロイスで­すよね

[ahokabokenasu]

一家に一台あっても操縦する人がいないが...