You need to ZOOM OUT or STAND FURTHER BACK for at least a few shots when you're filming this thing. This looks like a cool little treb, but I'm hitting dislike because you don't have a single shot in this whole video where I can actually see the entire machine in action.
Interesting design, tho i think you shouldnt have done a fall-angle that steep. It makes the whole thing more unstable and probably reduces the efficiancy since the CW;s need to be raised more without a significant effect.
Otherwise nice design, I made some math and saw your efficiancy came up to around 30 %. Some friction can be overcomed by making the Trebuchet bigger.
Hi, I bought the same plans. You will find the tebuchet is a LOT more stable if you mount it to a larger board. It also throws farther. I went up to 40# (20# per side) and can throw almost 300 feet.
It is called Carmina Burana. The most famous movement is "Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi (O Fortuna)" (Fortuna meaning Fortune in Latin, as well as a Roman goddess) by German composer Carl Orff.
i highly doubt that the range is 225+ i made a 13 ft tall normal trebuchet with 55lbs on it and it only makes it across my street --if anyone has any suggestions on how i can better the distance, please let me know
Just across the street O_o? You probably left too much portion of the arm on the side of the weight. Your pivot point of your arm should be a lot closer to your counter weight. Other than that, tweak with the angel of the release hook on the tip of your arm. F.A.T is great. Ive built 2 of them and personally think they are more fun than your regular ones.
Definitely sounds like the side of your arm with the CW is too long. Keep in mind that these floating arm designs throw much further than regular trebuchets. However, the practicality of a larger model that could throw a boulder to knock down a wall is ridiculous.
It has two, for the initial accelration it is closer to the sling then switches to whereever the wheel is polaced on the throwing arm. This alows the weight to free fall more easily giving the projectile a higher velocity. The weight also falls straight down instead of in an arc which also creates ore velocity.
Hey, I am a big fan of trebuchets. However, I am not familiar with the concept of a free arm trebuchet. Can someone please explain the difference(s) between a regular and a F.A.T. trebuchet? Your sinceer response would be appreciated. Just reply to my comment. Thank you
yes, i think i get it now. With the free arm trebuchet, the counterweight drops straight down, while in the regular trebuchet, the counterweight swings like a seesaw, right?
I dont have any problem with the floating arm, I think is a very great project and can give you more shooting range, but I dont think the range advantage is worth the precious time you waste on reloading... in those times of war, the fastest you could shoot, the best...
Well, F.A.T. wont work in combat not because the time it would take to re-load, but the fact that someone have to be on the top of it to put in the release pin XD.
yes, a normal HCW can shoot farther. A large HCW simply can take more weight. But pound for pound, a well built and calibrated FAT will beat an HCW handily. More of the energy goes into the arm, so with the same counterweight, more energy will be transmitted to the projectile with a FAT. I highly recommend building both, though, with the HCW being much larger. Nothing quite beats seeing a grapefruit fly several hundred feet before hitting the ground. Unless its a pumpkin, or a car...
@ardillosa That's why the floating arm trebuchet beat the normal trebuchet at the woodworks design competition. As far as efficiency goes the floating arm design is far superior to a normal trebuche.
Never seen a trebuchet like that. Nice design though. I prefer the design of the swinging arm, weight attached to the swing. More stable but less powerfull lol. Lol, great trebuchet.
Hey very nice trebuchet, and nice use of carmina burana. I am building a trebuchet of my own with about the same dimensions of yours and was hoping to building a floating arm model. I do have one question though, how did you make the trigger for the counter weight to fall? I have been trying to sketch ideas, but they all do not seem to work correctly. Thanks
its just a trap door. two pieces of wood are attached to the uprights . (see 1:07 on) To attach, i drilled holes in the cross beams and then sunk a tiny screw into the hole, allowing it to rotate on that axis. On the other arm I did the same. To cock the arm, raise it above the two trigger beams, slide them closed, one on top of the other, and secure with a coat hanger bent into a u with an attached string, pull, and the clip comes off, letting the trigger arms fall to the side.
Hey man, I have a treb f2k, almost done. I saw your video and thought you stole mine for a minute and finished it! Mine is designed to hold up to 100 kgs counterbalance 1.5 metres high.
You have inspired me to finish it!
I recommend for you though, that you anchor to the groundwith tent pegs or something.
google it, but basically, it is a piece of fabric which is folded and tied to crate the shape of a pouch. The length of the sling lines is all experimentation. A good place to start is the length of the arm, and work down from there.
Yes, it did. That happened before I installed a trigger, so when I released the arm, the wheels did not fall straight, and 'jumped off' the track, putting a wheel on the outside of the brace. Gravity won. Still, it was an easy repair, and it has not happened again since I installed a trigger.
Im not quite sure why it jumps....my guess is that the base is too narrow/ not heavy enough. I will screw it onto a large piece of mdf or plywood next time i fire it to see if that helps.
1:54 the wheels almost fell off the track
JesusisSavior97 4 months ago
really nice action. nice build.
BillofRightsBrutus 1 year ago
where do u find the plans to build this model? and what type of wood were u using?
cexywizard12 1 year ago
You need to ZOOM OUT or STAND FURTHER BACK for at least a few shots when you're filming this thing. This looks like a cool little treb, but I'm hitting dislike because you don't have a single shot in this whole video where I can actually see the entire machine in action.
dizzious 1 year ago
song plz?
jacob9for 1 year ago
ouch, i think something snapped in the last attempt :D:D:D
DJanGAta 1 year ago
Interesting design, tho i think you shouldnt have done a fall-angle that steep. It makes the whole thing more unstable and probably reduces the efficiancy since the CW;s need to be raised more without a significant effect.
Otherwise nice design, I made some math and saw your efficiancy came up to around 30 %. Some friction can be overcomed by making the Trebuchet bigger.
TeamCatapult 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can you link the page to your plans if there is one?
61sman16 1 year ago
can you link the page to your plans if there is one?
61sman16 1 year ago
Hi, I bought the same plans. You will find the tebuchet is a LOT more stable if you mount it to a larger board. It also throws farther. I went up to 40# (20# per side) and can throw almost 300 feet.
brianbev1 1 year ago
@brianbev1 where did you buy the plans?
Vitaliy711 1 year ago
where can i find plans for this
dastrubinator 2 years ago
Epic Trebuchet, HORRIBLE music.
TheGrangoon 2 years ago
are you kidding me? lol
FreestyleJogaBonito 2 years ago
thats very nice the wood work job was very good and that baby had some power lol
WOWman1797 2 years ago
nice job men!..ok ...now we need to multiply the design by at least 100...so we can hurl some cool stuff!...cars, boats, atv's..lol!
dirtydogvideo 2 years ago
what did you use for wheels? please reply
rcfreak2493 2 years ago
Comment removed
rcfreak2493 2 years ago
very nice job!
foad1337 2 years ago
action starts at 1:20
Unisizo 2 years ago 5
i dont care much about the weight inbalance and all that jazz. i thought it was bitchin'. whats the biggest thing you've thrown with it?
~Bungee
bungmasterteddybear 2 years ago
congrats on using youtubes #1 overplayed song
saltedsidewalk 2 years ago
Song? Do want!
Q3HackerPolice 2 years ago
It is called Carmina Burana. The most famous movement is "Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi (O Fortuna)" (Fortuna meaning Fortune in Latin, as well as a Roman goddess) by German composer Carl Orff.
rjllv426 2 years ago
I wouldn't want to hold my arm infront of the arm...
Sh4n73c 2 years ago
sweet, are floating arms more powerful then
youngmasterpete 2 years ago
apply physics...
saltedsidewalk 2 years ago
yes a lot more
dacasman 2 years ago
i highly doubt that the range is 225+ i made a 13 ft tall normal trebuchet with 55lbs on it and it only makes it across my street --if anyone has any suggestions on how i can better the distance, please let me know
trbo2na 3 years ago
Just across the street O_o? You probably left too much portion of the arm on the side of the weight. Your pivot point of your arm should be a lot closer to your counter weight. Other than that, tweak with the angel of the release hook on the tip of your arm. F.A.T is great. Ive built 2 of them and personally think they are more fun than your regular ones.
yi0535 3 years ago
wow you must not have built it right.
5in1killa 2 years ago
Definitely sounds like the side of your arm with the CW is too long. Keep in mind that these floating arm designs throw much further than regular trebuchets. However, the practicality of a larger model that could throw a boulder to knock down a wall is ridiculous.
TerranRepublic 2 years ago
some possible places of error my be:
1. the sling length may be wrong (it should be about the length from the tip of the arm to the fulcrum)
2.the counterweight may be too heavy or too light (the projectile should be roughly in between .5% and 1% of the counterweight)
if both those things are correct then i suggest filming it then slowing the footage down this will help you discover faults in the throwing action.
if you still can't see anything wrong post the video and let youtube tell you
DrDrdreydrey 2 years ago
Where is the fulcrum in a FAT trebuchet
myfriendadam 2 years ago
the bar that the weights are attached to. sorry for my hazey termanology
DrDrdreydrey 2 years ago
It has two, for the initial accelration it is closer to the sling then switches to whereever the wheel is polaced on the throwing arm. This alows the weight to free fall more easily giving the projectile a higher velocity. The weight also falls straight down instead of in an arc which also creates ore velocity.
JamesThWilliams 2 years ago
nice video editing!
sullygirl6 3 years ago
Hey, I am a big fan of trebuchets. However, I am not familiar with the concept of a free arm trebuchet. Can someone please explain the difference(s) between a regular and a F.A.T. trebuchet? Your sinceer response would be appreciated. Just reply to my comment. Thank you
scienceman89 3 years ago
you can clearly see the differences if you look at different vids of the two kinds of trebuchets. same ideas, different concepts!
Tr3buchetK1ng 3 years ago
yes, i think i get it now. With the free arm trebuchet, the counterweight drops straight down, while in the regular trebuchet, the counterweight swings like a seesaw, right?
scienceman89 3 years ago
yep
Tr3buchetK1ng 3 years ago
cool
tomqch 3 years ago
very nice design, but.... in a real size model, it would be a huge problem when reloading :s
carlosfrm 3 years ago
Any difficulty is worth it for the mechanical advantage of a floating arm.
inthefade 3 years ago
I dont have any problem with the floating arm, I think is a very great project and can give you more shooting range, but I dont think the range advantage is worth the precious time you waste on reloading... in those times of war, the fastest you could shoot, the best...
carlosfrm 3 years ago
very great lol
carlosfrm 3 years ago
Well, F.A.T. wont work in combat not because the time it would take to re-load, but the fact that someone have to be on the top of it to put in the release pin XD.
yi0535 3 years ago
actually the normal trebuchet can shoot way far than this design ... we already prove it at the school trebuchet competition
ardillosa 3 years ago
yes, a normal HCW can shoot farther. A large HCW simply can take more weight. But pound for pound, a well built and calibrated FAT will beat an HCW handily. More of the energy goes into the arm, so with the same counterweight, more energy will be transmitted to the projectile with a FAT. I highly recommend building both, though, with the HCW being much larger. Nothing quite beats seeing a grapefruit fly several hundred feet before hitting the ground. Unless its a pumpkin, or a car...
kcattila1 3 years ago
@kcattila1 Im lost.
brikfilm 1 year ago
@ardillosa That's why the floating arm trebuchet beat the normal trebuchet at the woodworks design competition. As far as efficiency goes the floating arm design is far superior to a normal trebuche.
JamesThWilliams 1 year ago
@ardillosa Were all the counter weights the same mass because if there not your experiment is screwed
10babiscar 1 year ago
@ardillosa what exactly do you mean by "normal" trebouchet
win2rgirl 1 year ago
my F.A.T was 6 ft tall 8 ft long arm was 10 ft long had 600 pounds of counterweight and flung 10 pound pumpkin 99 yds.
neilyferg 3 years ago
what's the name of the song?
ImAPainTer80 3 years ago
excalibur
trosek00 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no.... Tristiana - Nightwish
rs0201 3 years ago
It's "O Fortuna" from Carl Orff's Carmina Burana
woutmertens 3 years ago 10
Never seen a trebuchet like that. Nice design though. I prefer the design of the swinging arm, weight attached to the swing. More stable but less powerfull lol. Lol, great trebuchet.
Nickondeweb 3 years ago
I'm sorry, but I don't follow how to attach the coat hanger to keep it locked. Can you explain or, (if your'e up to it) make a tutorial?
the5chronicles 3 years ago
Smart! i have to build one of these on a 5 by 10 inch base for my history class. very helpful. by the way, i love the music!!
beyondapolloslyre 3 years ago
Bravo! Nicely built.
geepussywilickers 3 years ago
I was thinking you may want to put on some springs or shocks to reduce the shock at the end.
Motorcyclephil 3 years ago
this is inspiring. I may have to build a large one of these. only not as complex, or nice. hahaha.
Pantallicadeth 3 years ago
How long did it take to make this?
cacaskey08 3 years ago
Pretty cool, but I'd want to throw bowling balls!
I guess that's why they don't let me play with tools anymore...
joesmoe71 4 years ago
I think fire needs to be involved.
goose1077 3 years ago
Yeah, bowling ball on fire!
joesmoe71 3 years ago
uh no. vase filled with gasoline.
GoibniuGodOfTheForge 3 years ago
interesting. the floating arms i've seen have had the weight drop in front, not the middle. . . i wonder how it affects the performance.
nightsloth 4 years ago
nice but i like the regular ones
1231236226 4 years ago
Hey very nice trebuchet, and nice use of carmina burana. I am building a trebuchet of my own with about the same dimensions of yours and was hoping to building a floating arm model. I do have one question though, how did you make the trigger for the counter weight to fall? I have been trying to sketch ideas, but they all do not seem to work correctly. Thanks
Ashleyrogue 4 years ago
its just a trap door. two pieces of wood are attached to the uprights . (see 1:07 on) To attach, i drilled holes in the cross beams and then sunk a tiny screw into the hole, allowing it to rotate on that axis. On the other arm I did the same. To cock the arm, raise it above the two trigger beams, slide them closed, one on top of the other, and secure with a coat hanger bent into a u with an attached string, pull, and the clip comes off, letting the trigger arms fall to the side.
kcattila1 4 years ago
@kcattila1 u should have videotaped the trigger in action cuz I can't seem to get it right : [
AznReckoning 1 year ago
Nice trebuchet, but please show the distance slunged! None of these videos here shows the distance.
bindingnemo 4 years ago
Hey man, I have a treb f2k, almost done. I saw your video and thought you stole mine for a minute and finished it! Mine is designed to hold up to 100 kgs counterbalance 1.5 metres high.
You have inspired me to finish it!
I recommend for you though, that you anchor to the groundwith tent pegs or something.
tuginator 4 years ago
well done
jarichcocquyt 4 years ago
Where did u get the basis of your dimensions and such or did u just wing it?
Emerican321 4 years ago
Very cool. 225 feet is pretty good. ima have to make one of those :D please check my catapult vid out and tell me what you think
barahona125 4 years ago
That is the most beautiful thing I have EVER seen.
alfonsosaljedrez 4 years ago
The music might be a little overkill for a 3 foot treb...
n8s2cool 4 years ago
Hey how do you build your sling and harness?
sutherm3 4 years ago
google it, but basically, it is a piece of fabric which is folded and tied to crate the shape of a pouch. The length of the sling lines is all experimentation. A good place to start is the length of the arm, and work down from there.
kcattila1 4 years ago
Yes, it did. That happened before I installed a trigger, so when I released the arm, the wheels did not fall straight, and 'jumped off' the track, putting a wheel on the outside of the brace. Gravity won. Still, it was an easy repair, and it has not happened again since I installed a trigger.
kcattila1 4 years ago
Dude did it break right at the end there? One of the cross bracings? It looks like it does at 2:20
sutherm3 4 years ago
Im not quite sure why it jumps....my guess is that the base is too narrow/ not heavy enough. I will screw it onto a large piece of mdf or plywood next time i fire it to see if that helps.
kcattila1 4 years ago
O nvm i see now lol
Zephyr135 4 years ago
Pretty cool! That thing jumps a lot for a floating arm...how much weight do you have on it?
Zephyr135 4 years ago
Nice trebuchet
ein2stein09 4 years ago