I agree. Deciding between Bush and Kerry was like choosing between McDonalds and Burger King, Pepsi and Coke: it was the same product. I remember the campaign. I took notes. Bush talked of 'a strategy of freedom around the world', while Kerry (on the so-called left) called for 'extending the US military at the far corners of the globe'. Bush wanted tax cuts to keep the fat cats rich - so did Bush. The winner, as always: the power elite behind the scenes.
It makes so much sense. I have for the last few days woundered about the political system where I am from. And it does not matter what I pick, the choice I want is not there. We got capitalism, and communism, not as black and white as that, but for simplicity sake I call it that. No matter what I pick the rich will get richer and the working man that produces things will get less. Where is the system that limits the upper class? And I am not talking about the "a few million" guy.
There is no such system where the people doing things get money. Sure they get money too live, but they don't get back what they have made. If the bank was runned by the people we would get loans close too 0% and the inflation would be low. Or we could have the same system and use the money the banks made too build stuff for everyone. Why isent there a political system for the people, if there is equal rights the majority should have a say. Everything goes the way the mega rich wants.
Los "medios de comunicacion" que no son mas que medios de entretenimiento, se ha dedicado primordialmente a vender basura, a tergiversar movimientos sociales, corrupcion de estado y crimenes contra la humanidad. Sin embargo, el estado y los dueños de el; los ciudadanos de una nacion, hemos permitido bajo coercion, desde luego, que usen nuestras señales de aire, que son de una nacion y por ende propiamente de los ciudadanos.
I accidently deleted a comment I ment to reply to! The buttons are so close together! I am so sorry, if you notice this please re-write it.
The comment observed that I am using Hegelian dialectic to prove something the wrong way around. This is fair, but I do not attempt to use hegals thoughts to prove anything. I am observing things (common thought patterns) in our society, and using Hegal as a model to illustrate it. I could have used any dialectic which explored the ubiquity of duality
Neither left, nor right, nor the center. In my opinion to be truly free we can not allow a state to exsist and rule us. Even at all democracy, especially in the form we got it, is just a farce and has nothing to do with freedom. But i´m curious to see the 2nd and 3rd part of your argumentation.
1984 thx 1138 hollywood is pushing for this nwo the media in general wants it they use our minds as a breeding ground for their filfth we are saturated in it they indocranate us to their will what to eat what to watch how to act where to go how much we should spend what clothes to wear what shoes to put on our feet whats cool and whats not cool
the definition of dialectic you present as well as the examples makes a mockery of hegel's philosophy. it's not about picking one side over the other, or combining both sides to 'understand', it's about ascending to a wholly new diremption.
I think it's about distraction - keeping both sides in a circular, endless debate while the usurper (enter the conspiracy theory) maintains all power and conditions. If "they" have the power to draw the lines, it will never appear that "they" have crossed them.
On 2.58 that is George Bush senior being implied as a follower and believer in free will, is it only me that sees the hypocrisy of this, i don't think he gave much of a thought to Iraqs free will or letting his own son dodge Vietnam while encouraging thousands of other parents sons to go and die for American free will.
you have completely exagerated your case and mis-represented the nature of representative politics today. One of the guys at 5:12 should be wearing a blue tie.
Did you see the inauguration special of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart? They compared Obama's and Bush's speeches- some very similar passages. The correspondent says "the difference is that when Obama says this stuff, I get the feeling he doesn't believe it. And that gives me hope."
I apologize for the last few comments I accidently deleted! This was not intentional
One made reference to the spelling: its hard to edit my work on this computer as I write the text directly into Adobe Photoshop which is not a text editor. I wish I could find an easier way to do it.
America is still owned by Britian. We just made america think they won by letting them colonise but all the money had to come straight back to the crown.
No, you cut supply in volume proportionate with a drop in demand. This creates scarcity, constituting a rise in prices, being that their less crude to go around.
If no cut in production is made we'll see the economies in Eastern Hemisphere absolutely crumble! I use emphasis in recognition of the possibility that it could be just that bad.
The term "theory" needs a new name. The "lab rat" test is still running here in Atlanta. They are telling us a couple more weeks this shortage will continue. Still no media coverage across the country. God help us all!
HAHA That's funny. Either that was a good piss take or you are just making 1chozen's point. There has been petrol shortages in Atlanta that has been largely ignored by the mass media.
Wow! While I didn't know all of the reason behind this I always thought that using the terms liberal or conservative did nothing but divide the American people and therefor controlled them. If it could be made that we are each other's enemy then we would never look further for the truth. Thank you
The Elephant's RNC had their little stars turned upside at Bush's insistence, the single point at the top ..is now 2 points at the top forming the ancient symbol of Satan. ????
There is good literature on explaining Hegel's philosophy, Michael Allen Fox's "The Accessible Hegel" is the best book I know of. Also the myths about Hegel's philosophy (such as those perpetuated by this video) are dispelled in the book "Hegel Myths and Legends" by Jon Stewart. Most people who attack Hegel either never read him, read him and didnt understand him or read him and misunderstood him.
You are not using his "models and theories", you're using 3rd and 4th persons opinions. Like IntelligentHoodlum stated, Hegel never used such a triad and never claimed that the state was God's march on Earth. It's intellectually dishonest to keep this video up, in light of the fact that its content is incorrect.
This video demonstrates a superficial (thus poor) understanding of Hegel's philosophy. Amongst other things I will point out a few, yet important inaccuracies. Hegel's dialectics, first of all, never used the formulation "thesis-anithesis-synthesis" (or as you called synthesis "resolution") and in fact he denounced such ways of thinking. Second, Hegel never said that the state was "Gods march on Earth", please refer to hegel[dDOT]net/en/faq.htm#1.6
Intangion: are you serious with that comment? Voting is the only way democracy works, sorry your side lost in whatever your so angry about. But guess what not everyone can have it their way so get the fuck over it.
Longinusmaximus: congrats, you've put Hegel's philosophy well, even though I suspect you didn't think that's what you were doing. You say there can never be permanent day or permanent night, only the permanent transition. This is precisely what Hegel means when he unifies two dichotomous concepts into a higher third. I suggest you focus on the meaning of his term "sublation" ("Aufhebung" in German) and try to understand how a dialectic unity PRESERVES the negative as well as OVERCOMES it.
theirs always a problem with the world. as soon as we think we've solved one thing than another problem soon arises. all the things that human beings thought would bring them happiness such as science and technology have now failed us. now people like you are in search of alternatives such as equality, but little do you realize that your beliefs to our just a trend in our modern day society. they may be adopted for awhile, but then they'll come to pass like everything else in existence.
i agree with a more taoist approach to polarity. polarities can never be fully reconciled or it would mean the destruction of the universe. there can never be permanent day, permanent night, nor a permaenent dusk or dawn, but only a permanent transition between these two polarities. life is dependant on conflict and danger as much as harmony and safety. the dance between freedom and enslavement is just another dance that will never be concluded until the end of the world.
infact, these so called hinderences to progress are what make progress possible. without negativity there would be no conception of positivity and therefore no utilization of it. furthermore what human beings consider to be negative such as violence or greed, is essential in strengthening our race by eliminating those who are weak and cowardly. the elite are as essential to society as those who hate them. life is a dance between two polarities like rich and poor, which can never be reconciled.
i agree with hegels concept of polarities but i disagree with his notion that somehow a synthesis of those polarities will lead to progress. our human notion of progress is alien to our universe. this is because progress itself is a thesis and regress is it's antithesis. the thesis cannot exist without the antithesis and therefore human beings can never fully escape regression, there will always be hinderences to society such as poverty, crime and tyranny. "good" cannot exist without "evil".
Who would control this planet? Humans are unpredictable, murderous, and all around psychotic. We are virtuous to a fault, we will even blow ourselves up for our beliefs. Indeed, who would WANT to control the human race?
I'm not convinced that you have presented Hegel's dialectical method in the best light. Not to say that I don't think negative political ideals arose from Hegel's work, but I do think your video smacks of propaganda, rhetoric, and hand-waving, rather than a convincing close-reading of Hegel's thought and the writings of this supposed Hegelian oligarchy.
This is not an exploration of Hegals work my friend. This is an example of how Hegals axioms have precipitated in politics/world affairs. Its a perspective convenient to see things 'how they are' whether we like it or not...
It is not the point of this doco to explore the philosophical domain of Hegalian dialectic, but rather illustrate pragmatic examples of hegalianism within real life examples.
Yeah but my point was that this video really has nothing to do with Hegel's "axioms" as you put it. The "thesis/antithesis/synthesis" mantra is just wrong. Not only did Hegel never use those terms, it really misses the point of his insight into Dialectic thought altogether. The thesis/antithesis/synthesis approach is really more Socratic than anything. Plus he pronounces it "Heegel", which just makes me giggle.
I myself am not a formal student of Philosophy. But the hegalian thesis/antithesis/synthesis dialectic is something avidly explored in many discussions/lectures of his philosophy. Im not sure if he used these terms himself, but its actually irrelivent.
Haha, of course it's relevant. Hegel's terminology is *highly* technical and full of neologisms. Using words to describe his ideas which he himself never used is hugely deceptive. And Like I said, the thesis/antithesis/synthesis approach has existed since at least Heraclitus in the west and the Buddha in the east. If that were the depth of Hegel's insight into Speculative Philosophy, he would be worthless and no one would know his name. It's a drastic oversimplification and it misses his point.
The truth, for example, of 9/11 is this: Skepticism is no longer tolerated. All are to be obedient to the state. The conspiracy theory is thus seen to be a direct attack upon the state and its rulers who can do no wrong. But this is also the end of freedom: of the individual's right to question authority and its world.
I found the video to be a perfect start to a great trilogy and I enjoyed all 3 parts.
The intro drew me in, even though yes you made it simple, but that's what you needed to hold attention, and I liked your explanation of thinking... Your video's feature in my playlist Axiom-Suppression through Media.
I just, incidentally, revisited this video and realized my comment was negative beyond being constructive or admirably critical. I apologize, I don't know why I chose to write it.
If I loaned you $100 asking you to pay 5% interest, and I am the only source of legal tender in the country, where is the $5 interest payment going to come from? The only way to satisfy me for now is to go back to the bank for another loan. You satisfy the bank for now, but owe them more later. This is how the Federal Reserve works, and why the national debt is $9 trillion. See Google Video "Money as Debt".
He is not talking about hegalianism from a literary perspective but illustrating how a similar protocol has precipitated in politics. This much is obvious.
The only question in conention is whether this is deliberate or not.
The rest of it, meh, I do not fit into mainstream politics so none of the basic message was anything other than "well duh" as far as I was concerned, but if you have actually read Hegel and are not just going off some halfbaked interpretation then you really can't have been concentrating...
you have apparently no idea what the Hegelian dialectic is...
Hegel never used the terms antithesis and thesis - this was Bertrand Russell, and he oversimplified and to some extent misrepresented Hegel. Either way though your use of the concepts thesis and antithesis themselves are completely off base.
Regarding your disclaimers of resolution that "it is not ALL jews". Lets say this Oligarch is indeed fully and completely Zionist/jewish controlled. Then tell me Mr Non-Racist Yani: How you going to differentiate the innocent jews from the active co-conspirators?~I'll let you think about that Yani -count to ten. O.k. So now you see where the Nazis were coming from? But the jews deafeated the Nazis. So the Q is: How do we make sure the Jews lose this time finally?
I cannot agree, or even distantly embrace what you are saying: Blaming 'jews' is a naive and destructive conclusion that accomplishes nothing. If you are not talking about race, you are talking about humans. Lets just keep to that title shall we?
I would be happy to keep this to a private message, the comments section is not suited to this mode of debate.
only a mafia family is capable of such a grand conspiracy. Only the jews have this mafia family. It is not a racial issue. It is a religion, a language and a culture and for 2000 years they have been forgiven time and time again and given the benefit of doubt that they will cease and desist this behaviour and time and time again they conspire once more to enslave the rest of the world. Think what you want. I know already. There is no return once you apprehend the truth of the matter.
Yani, have you seen the vid on Hegelian done by itsmetom? Notice he puts Zionism as one of his tags. Yet you put CIA aned make no mention of the jews nor Zionism. I~m telling you man, at this late hour there is no time for pussy footing around. From your former replies I am impressed that you are quite naive about Zionism which is rather odd but not suprising for an intellectual as yourself obvious are. Are you a jew?
Yani, the sheeple idiot morons wouldn ' t even understand 1/10th of your vocabulary in this video. o.k. Remind the sheeple idiots that they are stupid, then tell them its the JEWS. WE WILL NOT DEFEAT THE JEWS WITH TRUTHFUL ARGUMENT. THEY HAVE DEFEATED IT FOR 2000 YEARS. LOOK AT JESUS AND WHAT THEY DID TO HIM.
I would like to see your full time study that you reference, as I think it is both myopic and ignorant to blame an event, or a situation on a race alone.
Lets ask the question what is race?
race can be determined at its most fundamental level as a common genetic genotype that manifests itself with common physical expressions. That's it!
As far as im concerned, no genetic predisposition makes us more likely to participate in intricate conspiracies, I do not attribute Kennedy's assassination to a particular race. The idea is absurd. The race argument is childish and useless.
As for 911, this video does not mention 911 at all.
"there is no doubt who is behind this world tyranny and corruption. Read Henry Ford - The International Jew" - find the link at iamthewitnessDOTcom. You wont be able to educate the sheeple this way. But then, do as you may, it will help some. At least dont add to blinding people from the fact that this is a jewish Oligarch. I never said round up EVERY born jew and KILL them ALL did I? So who is talking about RACE here Yani? Seems like only you are.
I never said it was a genetic predisposition and neither did Henry Ford, neither did Goebells, nor did any other revered critic of the jewish mafia. It is an indoctrination of the soul through a religion and a language. It is a mafia. Why is it that all of those who try to defend the jewish mafia have to misrepresent the criticism and censor it as racism or some other ignorant and mundane concept.
"the jews" are not a race. It is not genetic. It is a religion and a language and it is sickening for the rest of us. 2000 years of irrefutable repeated exploitation of non-jews by the jewish mafia. Why have you redefined my statements into what they are not? Is it because you are closed minded and unable to confront the adversity of the situation? Your expose on Heglian only helps the jews, only the jews would ever use it to its full nefarious anti-human (anti-goy) capacity.
NOtice Yani that the left right paradigm is TWO DIMENSIONAL? That is Hegelian DIalectic.
I know at 5.23 that you wont conceive the 3D concept of society and how 2D induces this illusion. And who are the Oligarchy Yani? SAY IT MAN BECAUSE PEOPLE AINT GOT TIME. It is the JEWS.
Pretty cool Yani but futile because only 18 seconds into it I~m typing to say that its futile because you didn~t warn the children about the jews.Its the jews Yani. I went to Uni for 7 years. I have studied 911 FULL TIME for two years now and there is no doubt who is behind this world tyranny and corruption. Read Henry Ford - The International Jew
I have, and they fit perfectly what I've been looking for, as how to explain the concept to people who truly aren't aware of it.
By footage, I mean airtime in the Main Stream Media. We are only presented with 2 options, like you say, the democratic viewpoint, or the republican, both of which have been hijacked by privatisation. The other parties that exist in our system aren't given airtime, therefore presenting only 2 options to the masses.
Well done so far, sir! Thank you for creating a vid that is attempting to expose this!
And just a little, small reinforcement: Have you seen any footage at all of the Independent Party? Or how about the Labor Party? The Third party? The Communist Party? I haven't, but they're out there.
I wonder if multiple choice testing programs young minds to deal with data in a Hegelian dialectic manner?
vanillaexplosion99 7 months ago
It's HAY-gel, not HEE-gel
Porkularpie 1 year ago
The sign on the wall said, please do not shit on the floor , so I jumped and shat upon the celling!
mobilechief 1 year ago
I was neither left nor right, as for center, I don't fit on the spectrum so no. I'm a libertarian.
spartacandream 1 year ago
my minds gone numb.
Adders232 1 year ago
I agree. Deciding between Bush and Kerry was like choosing between McDonalds and Burger King, Pepsi and Coke: it was the same product. I remember the campaign. I took notes. Bush talked of 'a strategy of freedom around the world', while Kerry (on the so-called left) called for 'extending the US military at the far corners of the globe'. Bush wanted tax cuts to keep the fat cats rich - so did Bush. The winner, as always: the power elite behind the scenes.
archdeaconj 1 year ago 3
It makes so much sense. I have for the last few days woundered about the political system where I am from. And it does not matter what I pick, the choice I want is not there. We got capitalism, and communism, not as black and white as that, but for simplicity sake I call it that. No matter what I pick the rich will get richer and the working man that produces things will get less. Where is the system that limits the upper class? And I am not talking about the "a few million" guy.
moegreen2 1 year ago
There is no such system where the people doing things get money. Sure they get money too live, but they don't get back what they have made. If the bank was runned by the people we would get loans close too 0% and the inflation would be low. Or we could have the same system and use the money the banks made too build stuff for everyone. Why isent there a political system for the people, if there is equal rights the majority should have a say. Everything goes the way the mega rich wants.
moegreen2 1 year ago
Los "medios de comunicacion" que no son mas que medios de entretenimiento, se ha dedicado primordialmente a vender basura, a tergiversar movimientos sociales, corrupcion de estado y crimenes contra la humanidad. Sin embargo, el estado y los dueños de el; los ciudadanos de una nacion, hemos permitido bajo coercion, desde luego, que usen nuestras señales de aire, que son de una nacion y por ende propiamente de los ciudadanos.
21proust 2 years ago
Si. Muy bien, amigo.
marcomariaz26 2 years ago
The media exist to entertain, not to inform -especially with all the trash they sell.
21proust 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice try. Keep it up check out esteembpo + com for social media marketing. dfhdfh
EdgardoJustice 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice try. Keep it up check out esteembpo + com for social media marketing. GFHT
packrellerey 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com
MonroeOgden 2 years ago
I accidently deleted a comment I ment to reply to! The buttons are so close together! I am so sorry, if you notice this please re-write it.
The comment observed that I am using Hegelian dialectic to prove something the wrong way around. This is fair, but I do not attempt to use hegals thoughts to prove anything. I am observing things (common thought patterns) in our society, and using Hegal as a model to illustrate it. I could have used any dialectic which explored the ubiquity of duality
ConcernedCitizen9 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this, friend, it's very thought provoking, interesting stuff :)
wolfgangrocker 2 years ago
what`s your politics?
Neither left, nor right, nor the center. In my opinion to be truly free we can not allow a state to exsist and rule us. Even at all democracy, especially in the form we got it, is just a farce and has nothing to do with freedom. But i´m curious to see the 2nd and 3rd part of your argumentation.
nofuckingwai 2 years ago
FALSE LEFT-RIGHT PARADIGME
iridespinners 2 years ago
lampchin57 2 years ago
every member of the founding fathers new in time
that america would need a new revolution our country was desinged in a way that you could compare it to the phoenix
i think its time to burn the system down and make one from the ashes that will serve the people
not exploit the people
im disgusted with the direction this great country is being forced through
and im tired of it
im gonna fight it as small a person i am
i will fight this bullshit
lampchin57 2 years ago
its good to see someone put what im thinking to words
and you do it in such a way that it is both interesting as well as informative
im glad you poseted these videos
if we cant change the world directly we can show the people a new point of view
lampchin57 2 years ago
true
im a concerned citizen
i write my politicians
but they never respond
theres nothing you can do now
other then go door to door
and then they tell you your crazy
so really theres nothing we can
but sit back and watch the show
and allow them to controll us
lampchin57 2 years ago
the definition of dialectic you present as well as the examples makes a mockery of hegel's philosophy. it's not about picking one side over the other, or combining both sides to 'understand', it's about ascending to a wholly new diremption.
astrosecret 3 years ago
This is not an introduction to Hegel, but rather using a small aspect of Hegelianism as a model to illustrate an observation.
I could have made the same arguments without any reference to hegel; as it is not the core argument.
Perhaps you were looking for something in the wrong place?
ConcernedCitizen9 2 years ago
"Wholly new diremption?" I think you mean viewpoint or standpoint, or maybe sublation?
ShoobyBugger 2 years ago
Well in the phenom. Hegel defines it as an articulation. but yeah, standpoint or concept with an antithesis would work
astrosecret 2 years ago
I think it's about distraction - keeping both sides in a circular, endless debate while the usurper (enter the conspiracy theory) maintains all power and conditions. If "they" have the power to draw the lines, it will never appear that "they" have crossed them.
somnusultimo 2 years ago 2
On 2.58 that is George Bush senior being implied as a follower and believer in free will, is it only me that sees the hypocrisy of this, i don't think he gave much of a thought to Iraqs free will or letting his own son dodge Vietnam while encouraging thousands of other parents sons to go and die for American free will.
villarshite 3 years ago
you have completely exagerated your case and mis-represented the nature of representative politics today. One of the guys at 5:12 should be wearing a blue tie.
almansell 3 years ago
Hahah :)
ConcernedCitizen9 3 years ago
Did you see the inauguration special of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart? They compared Obama's and Bush's speeches- some very similar passages. The correspondent says "the difference is that when Obama says this stuff, I get the feeling he doesn't believe it. And that gives me hope."
almansell 3 years ago
One party sets up the other one to win. It happens every 4 or 8 years. It works at one level or another in ANY two player game.
Most people instinctively know this but don't appreciate the implication.
kangalanatolian 3 years ago
The U.S. is not independent of Brittains colonization. It's another illusion.
blaziermissy 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i know the link is on my channel with the statutes
Isawanangel1X 3 years ago
I apologize for the last few comments I accidently deleted! This was not intentional
One made reference to the spelling: its hard to edit my work on this computer as I write the text directly into Adobe Photoshop which is not a text editor. I wish I could find an easier way to do it.
Thank you for all the kind responses/criticism
ConcernedCitizen9 3 years ago
America is still owned by Britian. We just made america think they won by letting them colonise but all the money had to come straight back to the crown.
the7thwreck 3 years ago
my only question then why did oil just plummet? if your runnin out you dont put it on clearance...
ripcabrinigreen 3 years ago
No, you cut supply in volume proportionate with a drop in demand. This creates scarcity, constituting a rise in prices, being that their less crude to go around.
If no cut in production is made we'll see the economies in Eastern Hemisphere absolutely crumble! I use emphasis in recognition of the possibility that it could be just that bad.
quinton01 3 years ago
I find this very interesting. thank you for posting (:
xchaoticmindx 3 years ago
The term "theory" needs a new name. The "lab rat" test is still running here in Atlanta. They are telling us a couple more weeks this shortage will continue. Still no media coverage across the country. God help us all!
1chozen 3 years ago
what shortage?
ripcabrinigreen 3 years ago
HAHA That's funny. Either that was a good piss take or you are just making 1chozen's point. There has been petrol shortages in Atlanta that has been largely ignored by the mass media.
dalhuset 3 years ago
In a sentance. You want the puppet on the guys left arm or the one on his right arm. Its still the same guy.
Eldritchard 3 years ago
Wow! While I didn't know all of the reason behind this I always thought that using the terms liberal or conservative did nothing but divide the American people and therefor controlled them. If it could be made that we are each other's enemy then we would never look further for the truth. Thank you
SwampShuck 3 years ago
The Elephant's RNC had their little stars turned upside at Bush's insistence, the single point at the top ..is now 2 points at the top forming the ancient symbol of Satan. ????
uuubeut 3 years ago
There is good literature on explaining Hegel's philosophy, Michael Allen Fox's "The Accessible Hegel" is the best book I know of. Also the myths about Hegel's philosophy (such as those perpetuated by this video) are dispelled in the book "Hegel Myths and Legends" by Jon Stewart. Most people who attack Hegel either never read him, read him and didnt understand him or read him and misunderstood him.
IntelligentHoodlum 3 years ago
Hi;
Im not attacking hegal at all.
Rather I am using his models and theories as a convenience and means to highlight certain issues. That is all.
ConcernedCitizen9 3 years ago
You are not using his "models and theories", you're using 3rd and 4th persons opinions. Like IntelligentHoodlum stated, Hegel never used such a triad and never claimed that the state was God's march on Earth. It's intellectually dishonest to keep this video up, in light of the fact that its content is incorrect.
EnlightenedHumanist 3 years ago
This video demonstrates a superficial (thus poor) understanding of Hegel's philosophy. Amongst other things I will point out a few, yet important inaccuracies. Hegel's dialectics, first of all, never used the formulation "thesis-anithesis-synthesis" (or as you called synthesis "resolution") and in fact he denounced such ways of thinking. Second, Hegel never said that the state was "Gods march on Earth", please refer to hegel[dDOT]net/en/faq.htm#1.6
IntelligentHoodlum 3 years ago
Intangion: are you serious with that comment? Voting is the only way democracy works, sorry your side lost in whatever your so angry about. But guess what not everyone can have it their way so get the fuck over it.
RollCTideJ 3 years ago
hegel's philosophy = empty bombastic nonsense covered by insane verbiage
mrfatd 3 years ago
I've come to a similar conclusion,
If the majority of "Voters" are good and reasonable people how is it they're unable to effect the changes in government they desire?
The 2 party system slit's this majority and then both sides are "Played Off" against each other!
In the end the majority gets little or nothing while those few pulling the strings seem to "Cash in"
uzijohn 3 years ago
democracy isnt freedom people
its not liberty
its 51% of the people forcing the other 49% to do something they dont agree with
"democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on whats for dinner"
Intangion 3 years ago
THE ELEPHANT = THE DONKEY By dividing us they have conquered us. The only parties now are the THE NWO GLOBALISTS vs. WE THE PEOPLE.
Gilgamesh73 3 years ago 6
Thinking is good, continue to Think...
wilburjr 3 years ago
This video is right on.
Our government is ROUGE.
You people have known this the whole time, or at least considered this to be true.
Even so, we have one more choice than communism..hahaaa
THESTRINGPULLER 3 years ago
I call on every Peace loving citizen of the world to Assemble with us on July 12th 2008 in Washington DC.
Search Youtube for: we the people 2.0
Watch and rate the we the people 2.0 video and then send the video to everyone that you know and ask them to do the same.
Do the same with this video
Are You Ready? - It Is Time!
Google revolution march and also:
givemeliberty . org / revolution
For Peace, Freedom & Prosperity - Make a Stand Now!
evryonesacritic 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good info~! thanks
Dpalmer777 3 years ago
Great Posts!!
cajunhornet60 3 years ago
Longinusmaximus: congrats, you've put Hegel's philosophy well, even though I suspect you didn't think that's what you were doing. You say there can never be permanent day or permanent night, only the permanent transition. This is precisely what Hegel means when he unifies two dichotomous concepts into a higher third. I suggest you focus on the meaning of his term "sublation" ("Aufhebung" in German) and try to understand how a dialectic unity PRESERVES the negative as well as OVERCOMES it.
feignNU 3 years ago 2
theirs always a problem with the world. as soon as we think we've solved one thing than another problem soon arises. all the things that human beings thought would bring them happiness such as science and technology have now failed us. now people like you are in search of alternatives such as equality, but little do you realize that your beliefs to our just a trend in our modern day society. they may be adopted for awhile, but then they'll come to pass like everything else in existence.
longinusmaximus 3 years ago
i agree with a more taoist approach to polarity. polarities can never be fully reconciled or it would mean the destruction of the universe. there can never be permanent day, permanent night, nor a permaenent dusk or dawn, but only a permanent transition between these two polarities. life is dependant on conflict and danger as much as harmony and safety. the dance between freedom and enslavement is just another dance that will never be concluded until the end of the world.
longinusmaximus 3 years ago
infact, these so called hinderences to progress are what make progress possible. without negativity there would be no conception of positivity and therefore no utilization of it. furthermore what human beings consider to be negative such as violence or greed, is essential in strengthening our race by eliminating those who are weak and cowardly. the elite are as essential to society as those who hate them. life is a dance between two polarities like rich and poor, which can never be reconciled.
longinusmaximus 3 years ago
i agree with hegels concept of polarities but i disagree with his notion that somehow a synthesis of those polarities will lead to progress. our human notion of progress is alien to our universe. this is because progress itself is a thesis and regress is it's antithesis. the thesis cannot exist without the antithesis and therefore human beings can never fully escape regression, there will always be hinderences to society such as poverty, crime and tyranny. "good" cannot exist without "evil".
longinusmaximus 3 years ago
this guy is obviously not american and has no idea about american, international or comparative politics....
trisix99 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kimuraone has spotted a major flaw in your video, i think you should remove it from youtube... you missed the dot on the e.g!!!1
lolatron1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You accidently wrote '1' instead of '!'.........Twice. (You also didn't use a capital 'I'....Twice.)
koscheii666 3 years ago
Kimuraone has spotted a major flaw in your video, i think you should remove it from youtube... you missed the dot on the e.g!!!1
lolatron1 3 years ago
Who would control this planet? Humans are unpredictable, murderous, and all around psychotic. We are virtuous to a fault, we will even blow ourselves up for our beliefs. Indeed, who would WANT to control the human race?
ufninja 3 years ago
This shows truth. Well done.
LadyDamorea1 3 years ago
OMG.
I actually felt really stupid watching this.. like, I've missed something completely.
HOWEVER, you've got me wondering mate.
..
You should do something about Australia !
munchkinhugs 3 years ago
Spelling check: e.g is supposed to be e.g.
kimuraone 3 years ago
what does this has to do with hegel?
comisionadoG 3 years ago
this is a classic example of an educated guy repeating what he has been taught by the very people who set the 'agenda'
prazeambeeble 3 years ago 2
i agree fully
CoberreboC 3 years ago
I'm not convinced that you have presented Hegel's dialectical method in the best light. Not to say that I don't think negative political ideals arose from Hegel's work, but I do think your video smacks of propaganda, rhetoric, and hand-waving, rather than a convincing close-reading of Hegel's thought and the writings of this supposed Hegelian oligarchy.
feignNU 3 years ago
This is not an exploration of Hegals work my friend. This is an example of how Hegals axioms have precipitated in politics/world affairs. Its a perspective convenient to see things 'how they are' whether we like it or not...
It is not the point of this doco to explore the philosophical domain of Hegalian dialectic, but rather illustrate pragmatic examples of hegalianism within real life examples.
SulfurCitizen 3 years ago
Yeah but my point was that this video really has nothing to do with Hegel's "axioms" as you put it. The "thesis/antithesis/synthesis" mantra is just wrong. Not only did Hegel never use those terms, it really misses the point of his insight into Dialectic thought altogether. The thesis/antithesis/synthesis approach is really more Socratic than anything. Plus he pronounces it "Heegel", which just makes me giggle.
feignNU 3 years ago
Gday Feign,
I myself am not a formal student of Philosophy. But the hegalian thesis/antithesis/synthesis dialectic is something avidly explored in many discussions/lectures of his philosophy. Im not sure if he used these terms himself, but its actually irrelivent.
ConcernedCitizen9 3 years ago
Haha, of course it's relevant. Hegel's terminology is *highly* technical and full of neologisms. Using words to describe his ideas which he himself never used is hugely deceptive. And Like I said, the thesis/antithesis/synthesis approach has existed since at least Heraclitus in the west and the Buddha in the east. If that were the depth of Hegel's insight into Speculative Philosophy, he would be worthless and no one would know his name. It's a drastic oversimplification and it misses his point.
feignNU 3 years ago
Brilliant!
The understanding of the Hegelian dialectic in Human preception is essential for free thought.
You Sir; have done Human Consciousness a great service.
Thank you.
z8it 3 years ago
Fantastic video. Thank you.
hatchk01 4 years ago
The truth, for example, of 9/11 is this: Skepticism is no longer tolerated. All are to be obedient to the state. The conspiracy theory is thus seen to be a direct attack upon the state and its rulers who can do no wrong. But this is also the end of freedom: of the individual's right to question authority and its world.
mujaku 4 years ago
So fucking patronizing
2029AD 4 years ago
huh?
ConcernedCitizen9 4 years ago
I apologise, it was not my intention beyond clarity.
ConcernedCitizen9 4 years ago
I found the video to be a perfect start to a great trilogy and I enjoyed all 3 parts.
The intro drew me in, even though yes you made it simple, but that's what you needed to hold attention, and I liked your explanation of thinking... Your video's feature in my playlist Axiom-Suppression through Media.
axiomgate 4 years ago
I just, incidentally, revisited this video and realized my comment was negative beyond being constructive or admirably critical. I apologize, I don't know why I chose to write it.
2029AD 4 years ago 2
Thank you... I admire a person who does not have to be right all of the time.
zizizzi 3 years ago
If I loaned you $100 asking you to pay 5% interest, and I am the only source of legal tender in the country, where is the $5 interest payment going to come from? The only way to satisfy me for now is to go back to the bank for another loan. You satisfy the bank for now, but owe them more later. This is how the Federal Reserve works, and why the national debt is $9 trillion. See Google Video "Money as Debt".
Dionysius9 4 years ago
what a load of balls
amandaxxx86 4 years ago
Great work!! Look forward to more video :D
dmptruth 4 years ago
He is not talking about hegalianism from a literary perspective but illustrating how a similar protocol has precipitated in politics. This much is obvious.
The only question in conention is whether this is deliberate or not.
elafos9 4 years ago
The rest of it, meh, I do not fit into mainstream politics so none of the basic message was anything other than "well duh" as far as I was concerned, but if you have actually read Hegel and are not just going off some halfbaked interpretation then you really can't have been concentrating...
candistyx 4 years ago
you have apparently no idea what the Hegelian dialectic is...
Hegel never used the terms antithesis and thesis - this was Bertrand Russell, and he oversimplified and to some extent misrepresented Hegel. Either way though your use of the concepts thesis and antithesis themselves are completely off base.
candistyx 4 years ago
Well done.
shiizaa 4 years ago
intelligent, good work...
photofu 4 years ago 2
Regarding your disclaimers of resolution that "it is not ALL jews". Lets say this Oligarch is indeed fully and completely Zionist/jewish controlled. Then tell me Mr Non-Racist Yani: How you going to differentiate the innocent jews from the active co-conspirators?~I'll let you think about that Yani -count to ten. O.k. So now you see where the Nazis were coming from? But the jews deafeated the Nazis. So the Q is: How do we make sure the Jews lose this time finally?
Focoist911 4 years ago
I cannot agree, or even distantly embrace what you are saying: Blaming 'jews' is a naive and destructive conclusion that accomplishes nothing. If you are not talking about race, you are talking about humans. Lets just keep to that title shall we?
I would be happy to keep this to a private message, the comments section is not suited to this mode of debate.
ConcernedCitizen9 4 years ago
only a mafia family is capable of such a grand conspiracy. Only the jews have this mafia family. It is not a racial issue. It is a religion, a language and a culture and for 2000 years they have been forgiven time and time again and given the benefit of doubt that they will cease and desist this behaviour and time and time again they conspire once more to enslave the rest of the world. Think what you want. I know already. There is no return once you apprehend the truth of the matter.
Focoist911 4 years ago
Yani, have you seen the vid on Hegelian done by itsmetom? Notice he puts Zionism as one of his tags. Yet you put CIA aned make no mention of the jews nor Zionism. I~m telling you man, at this late hour there is no time for pussy footing around. From your former replies I am impressed that you are quite naive about Zionism which is rather odd but not suprising for an intellectual as yourself obvious are. Are you a jew?
Focoist911 4 years ago
Yani, the sheeple idiot morons wouldn ' t even understand 1/10th of your vocabulary in this video. o.k. Remind the sheeple idiots that they are stupid, then tell them its the JEWS. WE WILL NOT DEFEAT THE JEWS WITH TRUTHFUL ARGUMENT. THEY HAVE DEFEATED IT FOR 2000 YEARS. LOOK AT JESUS AND WHAT THEY DID TO HIM.
Focoist911 4 years ago
Focoist911:
I would like to see your full time study that you reference, as I think it is both myopic and ignorant to blame an event, or a situation on a race alone.
Lets ask the question what is race?
race can be determined at its most fundamental level as a common genetic genotype that manifests itself with common physical expressions. That's it!
The race argument is childish and useless.
ConcernedCitizen9 4 years ago
As far as im concerned, no genetic predisposition makes us more likely to participate in intricate conspiracies, I do not attribute Kennedy's assassination to a particular race. The idea is absurd. The race argument is childish and useless.
As for 911, this video does not mention 911 at all.
I humbly ask comments stay on topic.
ConcernedCitizen9 4 years ago
"there is no doubt who is behind this world tyranny and corruption. Read Henry Ford - The International Jew" - find the link at iamthewitnessDOTcom. You wont be able to educate the sheeple this way. But then, do as you may, it will help some. At least dont add to blinding people from the fact that this is a jewish Oligarch. I never said round up EVERY born jew and KILL them ALL did I? So who is talking about RACE here Yani? Seems like only you are.
Focoist911 4 years ago
I never said it was a genetic predisposition and neither did Henry Ford, neither did Goebells, nor did any other revered critic of the jewish mafia. It is an indoctrination of the soul through a religion and a language. It is a mafia. Why is it that all of those who try to defend the jewish mafia have to misrepresent the criticism and censor it as racism or some other ignorant and mundane concept.
Focoist911 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is obvious has been MADE obvious. Banking and the media are activities and bankers and media-men are still "worker bees" within the system.
Very, very old families OWN the system.
neothomist1275 4 years ago
"the jews" are not a race. It is not genetic. It is a religion and a language and it is sickening for the rest of us. 2000 years of irrefutable repeated exploitation of non-jews by the jewish mafia. Why have you redefined my statements into what they are not? Is it because you are closed minded and unable to confront the adversity of the situation? Your expose on Heglian only helps the jews, only the jews would ever use it to its full nefarious anti-human (anti-goy) capacity.
Focoist911 4 years ago
NOtice Yani that the left right paradigm is TWO DIMENSIONAL? That is Hegelian DIalectic.
I know at 5.23 that you wont conceive the 3D concept of society and how 2D induces this illusion. And who are the Oligarchy Yani? SAY IT MAN BECAUSE PEOPLE AINT GOT TIME. It is the JEWS.
Focoist911 4 years ago
Pretty cool Yani but futile because only 18 seconds into it I~m typing to say that its futile because you didn~t warn the children about the jews.Its the jews Yani. I went to Uni for 7 years. I have studied 911 FULL TIME for two years now and there is no doubt who is behind this world tyranny and corruption. Read Henry Ford - The International Jew
Focoist911 4 years ago
Thanks for the Vid.
NewWorldObjects 4 years ago
It is more like hypothesis,contradiction consensus.
34hassan 4 years ago
Excellent Production and presentation of the issues that are hidden from plain view.
Eriksz 4 years ago
Thank you for the comments :)
Be sure to check out the other parts.
As for footage, what do you mean? Their individual policies?
ConcernedCitizen9 4 years ago
I have, and they fit perfectly what I've been looking for, as how to explain the concept to people who truly aren't aware of it.
By footage, I mean airtime in the Main Stream Media. We are only presented with 2 options, like you say, the democratic viewpoint, or the republican, both of which have been hijacked by privatisation. The other parties that exist in our system aren't given airtime, therefore presenting only 2 options to the masses.
BlazinTinman 4 years ago
Well done so far, sir! Thank you for creating a vid that is attempting to expose this!
And just a little, small reinforcement: Have you seen any footage at all of the Independent Party? Or how about the Labor Party? The Third party? The Communist Party? I haven't, but they're out there.
BlazinTinman 4 years ago