He was indeed talking about the beauty of science. Unfortunately those words are totally lost on people that know very little but think they know it all.
@StapleGunMS and *how* would other nations either confirm or deny that these rocks originated on the moon or better yet that NASA brought them from the moon? Or to take this even further that NASA walked on the moon in order to obtain these rocks that are purported to come from the moon.
@Gromitdog1 Why don't you do some actual research on it instead of mining YouTube videos for intangible evidence to support your ridiculous arguments.
@StapleGunMS The other countries have never been to the moon either. How could they confirm they are from the moon. As far as the rocks themself. I'm sure that they have enough material from meteors that they have collected over the years to distribute foreign rocks to other countries.
Mr. Armstrong walked on the Moon, as documented. This line from his speech had NOTHING to do with that famous achievement. The cynical and paranoid hoax believers that want ot see something that's not there trumpet this meaningless drivel, because they have ZERO evidence that the Apollo missions were faked. HOwever, there are mountains of evidence documenting their reality. APOLLOUNREALITY, you should be ashamed of yourself.
The only thing 'poor' here is the arguement that this single, selective statement can be twisted into a vague notion that Mr. Armstrong didn't walk on the Moon. MHBs use such 'fuzzy' inference as evidence, yet disregard the many, MANY times Mr. Armstrong has spoken distinctly about the reality of Apollo 11. Grow up, get an education, and you may have a chance to elude your own entry among the 'Darwin Awards'.
@Monkeyboysdontknow If all the top comments of YouTube left their videos in which they are top comments to form a single video of top comments; this should be the top comment of that video.
The only thing 'poor' here is the arguement that this single, selective statement can be twisted into a vague notion that Mr. Armstrong didn't walk on the Moon. MHBs use such 'fuzzy' inference as evidence, yet disregard the many, MANY times Mr. Armstrong has spoken distinctly about the reality of Apollo 11. Grow up, get an education, and you may have a chance to elude your own entry among the 'Darwin Awards'.
The Assumption that one controls another through there belief is a self proclaimed illusion to that individual and one who doesnt have the mind to understand that is a fool in any language
Theres a lot of dumb alternative hippy type fuks out there
He looks like he has come to terms better with living the life of a hoax leader. But he still clearly has enough of a conscience to make this kind of statement which is as close to the mark as he can go without getting iced.
@stalkervision Yes, Apollo 13 fixed their CO2 filters with duct tape, and Apollo 15 fixed their Rover's front left fender with duct tape. This is the advantage of manned missions, there is always a maintenance man near.
he knows that he is a liar! im sure he is very deppressed in his life. how can be someone so private and depressed if he was on the moon. if i would be there i would have such a great impression left on me. but look at him, this poor liar!
You are jumping to fantastic conclusions. Of course the first Moon landing happened and there was no reason whatsoever to be depressed. When I look at him I see a tremendously successful astronaut. He saved the mission singlehandedly by refusing to land too soon in a boulder field.
@orange70383 "wtf is wrong with this liar." Nothing is wrong with this extremely successful astronaut.
Why you would think that he is a "liar" beats me completely. I think you have been misled by some lunar hoax -campaign. So, there is actually something wrong WITH YOU.
So what is wrong with this orange? -- It does not check its facts!
Just look at the technology available then. Yes, everything was ready for the giant leap.
The Gemini program was very successfull and astronauts could really navigate in space. Computer technology was ready, Apollo got its own computer which handled the navigation. So it is not far fetched at all.
@PepeLogu I know it to be true. I worked for the Finnish Television Company and I commented live on
Apollo 14. You try googling Apollo 8, 10 or 11-17. You will find the nine missions to the Moon. Six missions landed on the Moon and came back with moon rocks. There are hundreds of pictures. You can find them all at ALSJ, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. There are the films as they were in their cassettes. Nothing is removed, nothing is altered.
@BjornPalmen I want to believe, I really do. But can't. Sorry. Too far fetched.
Just look at the technology available then; the TV:s, cars, computers (or lack thereof)... Or watch an episode of Star Trek TOS and it becomes completely obvious that we humans were really just a bunch of morons. We still are when it comes to space travel. We're lucky if we even can get off the ground without blowing up. :)
@PepeLogu The reason it feels far fetched could be that it looks like everything happened on the same day. You should study the Gemini flights where the astronauts learned to rendez-vous in orbit, absolutely necessary to get back from the Moon. Actually everything advanced very smoothly.
@stalkervision The best I can do about global warming is pointing out that the global temperature has been the same the last 500 years and I can see no reason why the temperature should change now.
@stalkervision There are 4 possibilities: 1. it is really getting warmer, 2. it is really getting cooler, 3. the temperature is not changing, 4. none of the above.
So far we have learned that the Sun influences the temperature, but we knew that before.
@stalkervision The Apollo Missions landing on the Moon are not "an old cold war scam". Of course they really happened. Your campaign here against NASA and US is the real scam.
By now you must know you are wrong. Just admit it.
@stalkervision You can stop your laughter now because there is no "apollo kodak special film". The missions used normal 70 mm Kodak Ektachrome. It did not fog because there was not enough radiation for that to occur.
@GUARDIANtrooper Bin Laden was killed in 2011. His death was confirmed by Al-Qaeda.
You are wrong again. And there are many pictures of air planes ramming the WTC from the outside, so it cannot possibly have been an inside job. So you are wrong there too. Like you are wrong about the moon landings being "faked".
@BjornPalmen The US government is Al-Qaeda, too blind to see the truth. So you think with the BEST security system on the planet, a bunch of idiots that don't know how to pilot a small plane, got pass our defenses and rammed two planes into buildings? Then the most secured building in the world that is protected 24-7 was hit and they only have a few frames of video that looks shady ass hell. And all the planes and people disintegrated on impact? You have to be a complete fool to believe that...
@GUARDIANtrooper Anybody who comes to New York can see with his own eyes that the WTC twin towers are missing. You say they were protected? With antiaircraft artillery? In the middle of Manhattan?
@GUARDIANtrooper I do mind your putting out incorrect statements like this one about WTC being somehow protected from aircraft. It is a lie and you know it.
@BjornPalmen Dude, I was saying the Pentagon is protected, not the world trading center, what the fuck is the matter with you, LMAO!! Read that shit before you submit dumb shit! I was saying, how could the most secured building in the world, THE PENTAGON, have a plane run into it? You could barely walk pass the bitch let alone fly a plane into it, lol! When you put all that bullshit in your mind at once, it spells CONSPIRACY! But you love government bullshit so it spells STUPID in your mind...
@BjornPalmen Do you have any idea how fast the US can get a fighter jet to these infrastructures and landmarks to protect them from terrorist? The Pentagon has its own protector and they often do drills of a flyby for many reasons. They have a military team trained to protect those power plants, buildings, bridges etc. 24-7 you idiot, lol!! I'm only 17, but you have to about 7, you are too fucking stupid to post a comment. Go troll on an XBOX video, if you even have the sense for that. LMAO!!
@GUARDIANtrooper "Do you have any idea how fast the US can get a fighter jet... "
Yes, they took too long, because even the second aircraft had time to collide with WTC.
"And all the planes and people disintegrated on impact" I think they burned because the planes were tanked with enough fuel to fly to California. Maybe the power plants, buildings, bridges etc. were protected 24-7
but that would have required an impregnable force field. :)
@BjornPalmen Wrong, it is declassified that the jets to be scrambled was issued an order to stand down by Dick Cheney himself, conformation given by secretary of transportation, Norman Mineta on record, ON VIDEO! Planes don't disintegrate, ((EVER)), not even the smallest ones. And kerosene is not an aid for disintegration. And our force field is our defense that is why it never happen unless it was staged by us. Here in California we have strict laws even on foil balloons, because of tracking.
@BjornPalmen WOW, it's a real live, complete idiot... Dude..., the jets that were supposed to save the buildings were ordered to stand down (disengage, don't do anything, stay, don't move etc.) The government didn't want to shot the planes down. Dick Cheney gave that order and over 3000 Americans were killed, because of it. Did you get it that time? Our government are murderous tyrants and you are next on there list. You see dude, to them, you are trash and soon they will take your ass out...
@GUARDIANtrooper Your arguments must be weak indeed to make you so offensive and unpleasant. There certainly were no jets supposed to save the buildings because noone knew which buildings to save.
@BjornPalmen Were fighters practicing saving buildings pertaining to the exact targets? Yes... Was this evidence declassified? Yes... Did the world trade center get bombed before? Yes... If so, would they take every possible measure to protect these very valuable infrastructure? Because they know and terrorist knows that these targets could very much so damage the US. I'm not trying to being offensive, you are provoking me to be this way. This debate is over....
@BjornPalmen You are a fucking idiot, they were practicing, that's DECLASSIFIED YOU IDIOT, LMAO!!!! The fact that the building was bombed before is the reason why they are protecting the building fool! You are not comprehending the points dude! Dude, that's why they scramble jets, they are always on standby. That is why we have air traffic control, to make sure we don't have planes hitting buildings and shit. If a plane get off course, and don't respond, it gets shot down...
In this debate you never cited any facts at all and you were personally unpleasant in every way.
"they handed out moon rocks" .......... NOT TRUE
"they were fake" .... NOT TRUE moon rocks cannot be faked anyway
"they destroyed most of the original material on purpose" ..... NOT TRUE, besides "most of" is a bit thick considering that only one copy of many could not be found.
"this debate is over" ....... IT NEVER WAS A DEBATE, JUST YOUR DESPERATE LIES
@BjornPalmen Your saying, "NOT TRUE" is no proof, show me some proof that they didn't hand out moon rocks. All you have to do is google fake moon rocks and you will see it all... Take a look and stop yelling out NOT TRUE, because it is true unless you can prove it wrong... Look up NASA destroyed original moon landing material and get back at me. You make me say fucked up shit to you, because you are full of shit all the fucking time... Yeah, you need to fuck off...
@GUARDIANtrooper There is no picture of anybody receiving a moon rock from the astronauts.
There are pictures of them handing out miniature flags.
YOU made the statement "they handed out moon rocks" so you prove it then.
NO information was lost. CBS had a copy of the moonwalk.
Your nick is singularly inappropriate, you are not a "guardian" of the truth, far from it, and you certainly are no trooper. You don't stand for anything. You just keep repeating garbage that others have invented.
@BjornPalmen Dude, stop writing bullshit and research, you didn't research at all. If I can find the shit by just typing it in, it is that easy. Keep searching like you want to find it, you don't want to find the shit. I'm not doing your homework for you, unless you pay me...
@BjornPalmen You point to one word that I misspelled in any of my comments and you will be depicted as the dumb BITCH -(notice the correct spelling) You are completely out of breath, run along and play with your sister or your little pee-pee, whichever comes first, you are losing the rest of your brain cell trying to think...
@BjornPalmen You must first understand the question, then answer it... You don't get a plane near the Pentagon, it is a no fly zone with permanent watchdogs. Anyone working in that building would tell you that. Answer this question, why did the government confiscated all videos of the hit on the Pentagon and refused to release them? Why did the owners of these videos had to get a court order to get their material back? Why was the video only about 4 frames showing nothing at all?
@GUARDIANtrooper I really have no idea why the US government confiscated all videos of the hit on the Pentagon and refused to release them. Maybe they did not like the competition with their own standard video "Flying low to the Pentagon"?
@BjornPalmen Then why can't you see it was to coverup something, because there is foul-play in each and every incident in the 911 tragedy. At ground zero, the steel was evidence to a crime scene, but they take it way quickly to be melted down? Evidence of malted steel only triggered by thermite that lasted months after 911. Heat detecting satellite images is proof of this. Plans to depopulate "Genocide," right in our faces. Look up government plastic coffins... These people are sick and hell...
@BjornPalmen really? then why have several of the hi-jackers been found alive and well huh..... you would have to be blind or brainwashed to think that the official story was true. I'm ashamed at the sheeple in this country that are owned by government findings and news stories.
@BjornPalmen They were found alive and well because they were not in the impact. It is a fact. They've come forward. Of course CIA run media didnt cover it. Am I the only one who thinks its strange that the so called hijackers were revealed in less than 15 hours after the fact, complete with pics and bios. Sheeple bought the JFK Oswald thing. He was arrested less than 2 hrs after and all further investigations were cancelled if any even existed. Why is it so hard to believe the govt. lies to us?
@BjornPalmen Yeah, but you are taking a the govts. word for it. Look up Iran CIA 1953, GUATEMALLA UNITED FRUIT DULLES CIA, MKULTRA. Inform yourself about what US Govt. is really about.Knowledge is power. If you are getting your knowledge from US media/govt. you are being deceived.
Every single bit of "proof" can be debunked by anybody willing to determine fact from fiction. Anyone willing to understand. Open your eyes and your buttholes.
@stalkervision He is not alluding to the space program, he is talking about basic scientific research, He says that young people should continue the work getting nearer to the truth, I don't think that includes posting wrong and deeply offensive - and quite stupid - speculations about "lying" astronauts.
@stalkervision Your comments on the private lives of America's two best astronauts are beneath contempt and total bull shit. How dare you post such offensive garbage?
@stalkervision Before you lose your ass completely -- LYAO laughing your ass off -- I must point out to you that the question was "did you see stars in the solar corona" - which was observed from the command module.
@stalkervision The question was if he could see stars when he was observing the solar corona. This was done in space, before the landing. That is why Michael Collins commented that he did not see stars either IN THE SUN'S CORONA.
After further research, I found the true "fake Moon Rock" story. IN THE 70'S NASA gave Moon rocks to sevral countries including the Netherlands. Of the dozen or so that went out ONLY ONE turned out to be petrified wood. NASA can only assume a mistake was made, or someone down the line substituted it to keep for themselves.
Funny how ALL the others were actual Moon Rocks. It just shows how CT's can tell only half the story to support their claims. The rest is exageration.
It's has to be a good reason why people are apposing this moon landing bullshit. Yes I called it bullshit, because I don't believe it happened. NASA and our world governments do too much stupid bullshit that makes people come up with these conclusions. Our government can put an alcoholic in an ABC store and lock him in for a week to see if he will drink anything. Then tell the world that they cured him and you fools will believe it just because it's the government and it's on TV. IDIOTS...
@amor987654321 Oh yeah? Well do the math... They said the rocket was supposed to get them pass the Van Allen belts. Ok..., lets say they made it and walked on the moon and put the flag up and everything. Ok..., I understand there is very low gravity in space, but how in the hell did this piss-ass Lunar Module get up to 25,000 miles an hour and 238,857 to earth back pass the Van Allen belts with that little ass fuel tank and made it back to earth without a scratch? I can't wait to hear this...
@GUARDIANtrooper also, it was possible to get past the VAB's. previous unmanned trips through the VAB's measured a 200 mSv radiation dose per hour(unprotected ofcourse). avoiding this particle radiation almost entirely was not too hard. the aluminium alloy on apollo was an extremely effective way of negating particle radiation. also their trajectory to the moon and back was at an inclination which passed through the less concentrated areas of the VAB's, traversing them in less than 2 hours.
@GUARDIANtrooper the dosimeters that the astronauts wore measured an average radiation does of 57 mSv for the whole trip(apollo 11 i beleive). also the gamma-ray and x-ray radiation on the surface of the moon was not significant, and was easily avoided with their spacecraft and 23 layer space suits (which they wore for the duration taht they were on the moon). the space suits were also made out of various metal and plastic thread. had a temperature control system etc etc.
@GUARDIANtrooper the "piss ass" lunar module, which was actually an amazing piece of enginuity, didnt reach 25,000 mph. for rondevouz with the command module (in lunar orbit), all it had to do was lift-off from the moon, pitch over, and obtain a speed of 3,600 mph, the speed required to be caught into lunar orbit. and at not a very high altitude either. once connected. the CSM only has to perform 1 burn and a few course corrections to get back to 25k mph and travel to earth.
@GUARDIANtrooper Really? Tell you what. Do some research. You'll learn the the LEM didn't do any of those things you mentioned because it didn't have to! It dodn't have to reach 25,000 mph, and was jettisoned BEFORE they made the return trip in the Comand Service module. You "hoaxers" are really stretching aren't you? Why not just give up?
@Mozart1220 We won't give up, because whistleblowers put too much evidence that it was a hoax. And..., the hoaxers are the ones doing the conspiracies and the whole landing process and the so-called rendezvous was said to be complete FAKED, by professional analysts of many scientific classes. You are here because you read the title which means you have doubts of your own. You are just waiting for a good reason to jump or waiting for a strong whistleblower like Neil Armstrong to spill it...
@GUARDIANtrooper WHICH "professional anaysts"? Got any names? WHAT "scientific classes"? I'm here because someone e-mailed me the link and said "Look! Another Moon Hoaxer MORON." Your "theories" have been shot down so many tiimes it's HILARIOUS! "No stars in the photos" Jeez, man, a kid in a third grade photography class could refute that! Non Parallell shadows? They aren't parallel on Earth when THE GROUND IS UNEVEN. Not even the Netherlands think a fake the rock means it's a hoax!
@GUARDIANtrooper The "completely faked" rendezvous in orbit around the Moon was repeated six times without trouble: Apollo 11, Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17 all did it.
@GUARDIANtrooper The LM rode with the Command Module and together they accelerated to 25 000 mph to leave the earth's gravity. The little fuel tank just brought the LM in for landing and then up and back into orbit to rendezvous with the CM. No great mystery here.
@GUARDIANtrooper I don't think a guy who thinks the LEM came all the way back from the Moon and that the Moon landing was a hoax can call anyone else an "idiot".
@Mozart1220 That's just it, you don't think, you have them thinking for you... You would probably call Neil Armstrong a liar if he comes out and says, "it was all a lie..." Sleep on it for the duration of these hard time in your fighting thoughts, I've transformed. Mark my word, something will convince you and your head in their astronaut visor will morph into a JACKASS, I'll be that fly on the wall shaking my head. No I didn't tell you so, they did, but you ignored their lies...
@GUARDIANtrooper Wow...all that and almost no point or proof of your claims at all! Just you saying I don't think and you call me a jackass. very nice. I'll tell you what. My Mom worked for Collins Radio (Now Rockwell) during the 60's. She was INVOLVED in the space program. I got to meet some of these people like Pete Conrad and Charlie Duke. I have some hard news for you. THESE MEN WALKED ON THE MOON. Tell me this, WHY do you think it's impossible? PROOF, not BS please.
@Mozart1220 Where is the proof that they did land on the moon besides those obvious sketchy/FAKE ass pictures and videos that were dissected by so many great scientist of all branches of science. If you want to believe this bullshit, that's your prerogative, be a fool of Hollywood trickery, you aren't the only fool on earth, look forward to that I guess... If you can't be a skeptic to reason to understand a little better, then at least pretend you are capable to conjure up some common sense...
@GUARDIANtrooper The proof is in the fact that they WENT! They brought back rocks and left instruments there. WHAT pictures were "dissected" by WHOM? Please tell me you aren't still claiming there should be stars in the sky, or that the shadows should all be black. Please tell me you have at least gotten through middle school science. Not to mention the fact that the Russians were tracking all our spacecraft, just like we were tracking theirs. Are you saying they were in on the hoax?
@Mozart1220 Mini answer are played out, try again... Those so-called lunar rocks were named petrified wood, busted by some of the best analyst that had to gusts to say so. You can setup a lunar set anywhere on this earth and take pictures and videos, dumb answer. All the videos and pictures were dissected, this is not the only video on Youtube you know. After you realized that you didn't record stars on the first mission, why didn't you get a better camera for the second? Leaders aren't Russian.
@GUARDIANtrooper Actually, the petrified wood thing cane from a "gift" given by a "NASA staffer" RIGHT AFTER APPOLO 11 CAME BACK. Now think about it, the FIRST moon landing. Do you REALLY think NASA is giving out actual Moon rocks that are that rare? No. And there is no way to take pictures of an astronaut in a white suit on the Moon and show any stars! it's not about the quality of the camera, it's about the fact that the exposure wouldn't allow it! It's DAYTIME on the Moon. Wow.
@Mozart1220 No, the rocks were observed by hundreds of scientists and many came forward after one of the rocks got into the possession of a museum, which was confirmed by NASA to be an authentic moon rock and tested by the museum as being petrified wood. The astronauts gave out the rocks to important people. Keep that in mind, fake rocks, you can have all you want we can make more, right? The moon is not as bright as they claim it to be, or the pictures wouldn't come out at all, more bullshit.
@GUARDIANtrooper I ask you again, do you REALLY think NASA would allow astorauts to GIVE AWAY rocks that are more valuable than the rarest diamond? Do you REALLY think that even if they were inclined to do so they would do it after the FIRST mission? Do you REALLY think the government would ALLOW them to do so after spending so much money and risking the very lives of the people who went? I looked up your little tale, and it's exactly as I said. Whoever gave out petrified wood wasn't NASA.
@GUARDIANtrooper "After you realized that you didn't record stars..."
The moon missions were about the moon, not about stars. They of course navigated by the stars, they had star charts on board. The moon has no air so all uv radiation is coming through. Apollo 16 had a camera with uv sensistive film and took picgtures of he Capricorn stars and Earth.
@GUARDIANtrooper A pretty good proof that they landed was that they took parts of the Moon back with them, And it was not cheese either, it was solid moon rocks, Lots of them.
@BjornPalmen Then why did they give people petrified wood then? You have to understand, I don't believe in the moon landing so I don't believe in moon rocks. Any piece of meteorite could be named a lunar rock or bullshit they made up in a lab or whatever. Point is, if a few moon rocks is all the evidence you have of a moon landing and all the bullshit photos and videos that suggests foul play is mine, you lose that battle. Better luck on another government hoax, you probably believe them all...
@GUARDIANtrooper The astronauts never gave away moon rocks to ANYBODY, ok? The rocks were distributed to geologists all over the world. They are much too important to be given away as souvenirs.
Lunar rocks have been millions of years on the lunar surface so they are quite different from earth rocks.
The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal ALSJ has all the pictures and videos from the SIX missions to the Moon,
Google "ALSJ" and you will find all proof you need. We really went to the moon! Six times!
@BjornPalmen Yes they did, they handed out moon rocks to a lot of people when they went on tours, FACT... The rocks were part of the hoax. They were small enough to give away, they had plenty, they were FAKE... ALSJ, don't have all the videos, because they destroyed most of the original material on purpose, what are you talking about? I'm not going to google a bunch of fake bullshit, that's why I'm here, to shine the light on this hoax. You people love defending bullshit lies, the end is near.
@GUARDIANtrooper You say "I'm not going to google". Then I have nothing more to say to you!
The moon rocks are certainly not fakes, the are sent geologists (actually selenologists) all over the world.
There is really no way to fake moon rocks, because you must fake millions of years of bombardment by micrometeors. And that takes time :). ALSJ has a lot of videos, none of them were "destroyed on purpose".
What would be the point of destroying fake videos? :D
@BjornPalmen You said, "I don't have nothing more to say to you, " and then you write me a book? LMAO!! Lets say they did go to the moon... Who is to say that some of those rocks weren't fragments of meteorites on the moon or impact collision? The moon acts as a shield against astroids and meteoroids and some of the debris do fall to earth, right? Even some of the lunar rocks or giant boulders like fragments could've been dragged along for the ride if they didn't get burned up in the trail.
@GUARDIANtrooper "some of the debris do fall to earth, right?" Right, but nobody can find them. Typically the most recent meteorites fell thousands of years ago.
@BjornPalmen A thousand years ago, LMAO!! Just a few months ago a pretty sizable meteor hit the road here in California and they had the whole place blocked off. They wouldn't even let you get out of the car to go near it. But what's worse, It didn't even make mainstream media, I wonder why? Most fragments burn up in the atmosphere, but the larger ones get by and if the environment that it pass through or strike is right, it could stay in tact. Government rock collectors aren't honest dude...
@GUARDIANtrooper I am of course referring to meteorites that can be found and analyzed, not shooting stars in California. The meteors that are found are in museums now and they are pretty old.
@GUARDIANtrooper "the astronauts handed out moon rocks to a lot of people when they went on tours, FACT"
That is a lie and you know it. Can you find a picture of ANYBODY of these lots of people actually receiving a rock? No you cannot! And your use of "FACT" after writing complete bull shit is offensive. I really think you should apologize.
@BjornPalmen You are right, I'm sorry... That your parents created an idiot... Call me a liar will you... You need to check your shit before you submit. I don't talk shit unless I research, you are just speculating a bunch of bullshit. You calling me a liar is not the right answer fool... You need to find the Wizard of Oz and get you a brain to think on your own, because the government is holding that end for you... Use the FORCE or something, let go... Trust me... LMAO!!
@BjornPalmen Two months ago GUARDIANtrooper said "astronauts handed out moon rocks to a lot of people". THAT WAS A LIE. Two months later he has still not found a single picture of anybody receiving a rock from an astronaut. Because it never happened. End of story.
moon rocks are the most valuable piece of mineral on the planet, small fragments are worth a fortune so no, the astronauts did not hand them out to a lot of people, the government had very tight control over them.
I think they Apollo team members should have been given rings with a moon rock in them that'd of been cool hell Super Bowl rings are a big deal what about a moon ring?
Well they brought back over 800 lbs of them would it have killed the US/NASA to give the Apollo astronauts a 1 carat moon rock in a ring to commemorate their achievement?
@Blahblobify That is a very good idea. But the rings should not be gratis. Nasa should charge for them what they would be worth in gold. The money should go to the MMM, the Manned Mission to Mars in 2015.
@BjornPalmen Hate to interupt you while you talk to yourself, but you are truly a dumb ass. Guess you never googled fake Dutch moon rock now have you?
@un4g1v3n1 You are the dumb ass that blocks all my replies! I know about the moon rock which actually was red petrified wood. That makes it impossible hat it came from the moon. The relatives of a Dutch minister found it after his death in his belongings and immediately assumed it was a moon rock.
I guess they did not know that there never were any petrified forests on the moon.
@BjornPalmen "You are the dumb ass that blocks all my replies!" Hmmm, with manners like that I wonder why anyone would block you? Hmmm. Your answer is shit by the way. That 'moon rock' was kept as it was. It's simply the fact that the milli vanilli astronuts didn't have any moon rocks, as they were unavailable on the moonset. However, petrified wood was laying around all over the desert. That you cannot fathom the fakery is your own ignorance, and misfortune!
@BjornPalmen Since you are incapable of investing the minimal amount of time required to understand the ACTUAL environment of space within the PLASMA RADIATION LADEN Van Allen Radiation betls, or the GCR/SOLAR PARTICLE LADEN space beyond them, you will continue to buy the Apollo BULLSHIT STORY. And since you are incapable of googling Von Braun, and moon rocks, you will continue to refuse to admit that the rocks being used to perpetuate your mythical story were collected two years prier to A11.
@un4g1v3n1 " the ACTUAL environment of space within the PLASMA RADIATION LADEN Van Allen Radiation betls, or the GCR/SOLAR PARTICLE LADEN space " - and the SEALoperated BIN LADEN mission?
@un4g1v3n1 - "the trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in the region and less than 2 hours in the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage.
The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is nonsense."
@GUARDIANtrooper You really think that the astronauts destroyed most of the original material on purpose?
Because that is what you wrote. The astronauts "destroyed most of the original material on purpose"... give me strength... How does it feel to continuously produce garbage and bull shit about the space program and call it FACT? Do you sleep well in the night?
@BjornPalmen I didn't say the astronauts destroyed shit, with your non-comprehending ass, LMAO!! The astronauts/pawns were just actors on a set. NASA destroyed the originals and now they magically have digital remastered video for all you viewing needs and purposes, WHAT A FUCKING JOKE... I'm going to play my XBOX fuck the moon, LMAO!!
@GUARDIANtrooper You just said "I didn't say the astronauts destroyed shit"
But this IS what you said yesterday:
"Yes they did, they handed out moon rocks to a lot of people when they went on tours, FACT... The rocks were part of the hoax. They were small enough to give away, they had plenty, they were FAKE... ALSJ, don't have all the videos, because they destroyed most of the original material on purpose, what are you talking about?"
@BjornPalmen Dude! Not the astronauts, NASA/government, you need to stop snorting that moon dust, LMAO! And stop quoting me, you seem like a machine, loosen up a bit, breath, ahhhhhhh and state your argument. I don't hate anyone on here, I just can't believe something that's even remotely appealing to be a lie. I don't have any lies to straighten, but I could surely point them out, especially if they are wrapped in bullshit. Joke: Why didn't Russia go to the moon? Because Area 51 was occupied...
@GUARDIANtrooper There are hundreds of good pictures on in the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, the ALSJ (you can google ALSJ). They are the actual, complete 70 mm film cassettes from the Hasselblads and no picture is censored or changed.
So you are COMPLETELY WRONG with your half-baked ideas of Hollywood trickery and you should apologize.
@BjornPalmen Apoligize?! To whom, to you?! LMAO!! All those pictures were analyzed by some of the best analysts and scientists that had the guts to come forward. They all concluded there are major problems in many aspects of the pictures. The technician found in one of the so-called moon landers' visor with no backpack and wearing black boots and a sleeveless jacket is quite a joke to laugh at. When you lie, you bleed more lies. Lies want to be seen and it will come from under the coverings...
@GUARDIANtrooper "the technician found in one of the so-called moon landers' visor with no backpack and wearing black boots and a sleeveless jacket is quite a joke"
The joke is on you because there simply is no such picture. "Sleeveless jacket" indeed,
IMO you should apologize to all astronauts for spreading such vicious lies about them.
@GUARDIANtrooper You need God's help in order to correct all the incorrect statements you have made here?
This is one of the your worst, you said this one week ago:
"The rocks were part of the hoax. They were small enough to give away, they had plenty, they were FAKE... ALSJ, don't have all the videos, because they destroyed most of the original material on purpose"
@Mozart1220 Why don't you put a tin foil hat on and just maybe it would give you some reception of common knowledge that your pathetic brain is lacking. Or maybe it could help you keep your foot out of your ass and the other foot out of your mouth. Trust me, it would be an improvement versus your lame ass suggestions... If you want to make a point, stand in front of a mirror to get a better view of fool you are referring to...
He's talking about the beauty of science. Its a speaking for undergraduates.
NEVERSTOPJAMIN 1 month ago
@NEVERSTOPJAMIN
He was indeed talking about the beauty of science. Unfortunately those words are totally lost on people that know very little but think they know it all.
TheSpiritof1969 1 week ago
His voice wavers as if he is scared to be saying those words.
questionsleadtotruth 1 month ago
Comment removed
BjornPalmen 2 months ago
180 moon rocks were given to other nations. None of these nations found any evidence that they weren't from the moon.
StapleGunMS 4 months ago
@StapleGunMS and *how* would other nations either confirm or deny that these rocks originated on the moon or better yet that NASA brought them from the moon? Or to take this even further that NASA walked on the moon in order to obtain these rocks that are purported to come from the moon.
Gromitdog1 4 months ago
@Gromitdog1 Helium-3. l2science before making an argument pl0x.
StapleGunMS 4 months ago
@StapleGunMS and *how* was this established as a benchmark test to verify that these rocks are in fact from the moon?
Gromitdog1 4 months ago
@Gromitdog1 Why don't you do some actual research on it instead of mining YouTube videos for intangible evidence to support your ridiculous arguments.
StapleGunMS 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StapleGunMS in other words you have no answer.
Gromitdog1 4 months ago
@StapleGunMS The other countries have never been to the moon either. How could they confirm they are from the moon. As far as the rocks themself. I'm sure that they have enough material from meteors that they have collected over the years to distribute foreign rocks to other countries.
shelbycharger 4 months ago
@shelbycharger Japan send a moon probe which confirmed the moon landings
echozgus 4 months ago
@echozgus And those were proof positive? Their country is the new Van Allen Radiation Belt!
bumcheek7 3 months ago
@bumcheek7 Really? and what are you going to do wiseguy?
echozgus 3 months ago
i'm seein a bandit, not a heroe in this video
carolcamboriu 5 months ago
ha look at that old bastard.
tha1dreamer 5 months ago
Mr. Armstrong walked on the Moon, as documented. This line from his speech had NOTHING to do with that famous achievement. The cynical and paranoid hoax believers that want ot see something that's not there trumpet this meaningless drivel, because they have ZERO evidence that the Apollo missions were faked. HOwever, there are mountains of evidence documenting their reality. APOLLOUNREALITY, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Monkeyboysdontknow 6 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow poor
weapons33 5 months ago
@weapons33
'poor'
The only thing 'poor' here is the arguement that this single, selective statement can be twisted into a vague notion that Mr. Armstrong didn't walk on the Moon. MHBs use such 'fuzzy' inference as evidence, yet disregard the many, MANY times Mr. Armstrong has spoken distinctly about the reality of Apollo 11. Grow up, get an education, and you may have a chance to elude your own entry among the 'Darwin Awards'.
Monkeyboysdontknow 5 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow If all the top comments of YouTube left their videos in which they are top comments to form a single video of top comments; this should be the top comment of that video.
StapleGunMS 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weapons33
'poor'
The only thing 'poor' here is the arguement that this single, selective statement can be twisted into a vague notion that Mr. Armstrong didn't walk on the Moon. MHBs use such 'fuzzy' inference as evidence, yet disregard the many, MANY times Mr. Armstrong has spoken distinctly about the reality of Apollo 11. Grow up, get an education, and you may have a chance to elude your own entry among the 'Darwin Awards'.
Monkeyboysdontknow 5 months ago
The Assumption that one controls another through there belief is a self proclaimed illusion to that individual and one who doesnt have the mind to understand that is a fool in any language
Theres a lot of dumb alternative hippy type fuks out there
johnmoodymusic 6 months ago
He looks like he has come to terms better with living the life of a hoax leader. But he still clearly has enough of a conscience to make this kind of statement which is as close to the mark as he can go without getting iced.
DragonYearJoji 6 months ago
This is an example of how you wilfully distort an interview completely.
Neil Armstrong is saying (Apollo 11 Press Conference, about 30:00);
"I don't recall which stars I saw."
He had to find every star on his star map (just auctioned off for $218 000) and feed its number to the computer.
You quote him as saying " I can't recall seeing stars.." LMAO and then you start laughing your ass off...
Your version: "I can't recall seeing stars", the truth: he said: "I don't recall which stars I saw."
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@stalkervision Yes, Apollo 13 fixed their CO2 filters with duct tape, and Apollo 15 fixed their Rover's front left fender with duct tape. This is the advantage of manned missions, there is always a maintenance man near.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
he knows that he is a liar! im sure he is very deppressed in his life. how can be someone so private and depressed if he was on the moon. if i would be there i would have such a great impression left on me. but look at him, this poor liar!
diewahrheitistnochda 7 months ago
You are jumping to fantastic conclusions. Of course the first Moon landing happened and there was no reason whatsoever to be depressed. When I look at him I see a tremendously successful astronaut. He saved the mission singlehandedly by refusing to land too soon in a boulder field.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
It's more like a very private man being asked to speak in public.
Mozart1220 7 months ago 2
For a man who went to the moon he is very Depressed about it, his attitude body language etc, tell me he being forced to lie.........
jonescool1fly 7 months ago 2
Protective layers. Truth either is or isn't it doesn't need protection. wtf is wrong with this liar.
orange70383 8 months ago
@orange70383 "wtf is wrong with this liar." Nothing is wrong with this extremely successful astronaut.
Why you would think that he is a "liar" beats me completely. I think you have been misled by some lunar hoax -campaign. So, there is actually something wrong WITH YOU.
So what is wrong with this orange? -- It does not check its facts!
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
Just look at the technology available then. Yes, everything was ready for the giant leap.
The Gemini program was very successfull and astronauts could really navigate in space. Computer technology was ready, Apollo got its own computer which handled the navigation. So it is not far fetched at all.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
I hope we one day actually develops the necessary technology to travel to the moon.
PepeLogu 9 months ago
@PepeLogu The necessary technology was in fact developed over 50 years ago and we went to the Moon nine times.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Really? Do you honestly believe that?
PepeLogu 9 months ago
@PepeLogu I know it to be true. I worked for the Finnish Television Company and I commented live on
Apollo 14. You try googling Apollo 8, 10 or 11-17. You will find the nine missions to the Moon. Six missions landed on the Moon and came back with moon rocks. There are hundreds of pictures. You can find them all at ALSJ, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. There are the films as they were in their cassettes. Nothing is removed, nothing is altered.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen I want to believe, I really do. But can't. Sorry. Too far fetched.
Just look at the technology available then; the TV:s, cars, computers (or lack thereof)... Or watch an episode of Star Trek TOS and it becomes completely obvious that we humans were really just a bunch of morons. We still are when it comes to space travel. We're lucky if we even can get off the ground without blowing up. :)
PepeLogu 9 months ago
@PepeLogu The reason it feels far fetched could be that it looks like everything happened on the same day. You should study the Gemini flights where the astronauts learned to rendez-vous in orbit, absolutely necessary to get back from the Moon. Actually everything advanced very smoothly.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision "Bill Nye is a poofter anyway" So am I and you managed to get his three-letter last name wrong.
And you think the industrial revolution made global warming. It seems everything you write is either inaccurate or dead wrong. And offensive to boot.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision You really are off-topic. The industrial revolution put men on the moon.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision The best I can do about global warming is pointing out that the global temperature has been the same the last 500 years and I can see no reason why the temperature should change now.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision It is Bill Nye, not Bill Ny. :)
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stalkervision Do you believe in global warming or don't you? And no, I could not care less about what the "vast majority" thinks!
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision What are your views on global warming?
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision There are 4 possibilities: 1. it is really getting warmer, 2. it is really getting cooler, 3. the temperature is not changing, 4. none of the above.
So far we have learned that the Sun influences the temperature, but we knew that before.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision "grow up for once"
This is the famous "ad hominem" defense. When you utterly lose an argument, start insulting your opponent instead.
Only it will not work on me.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision Yes, I am the tool of truth, That is why you are starting to feel so uncomfortable here.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision If you are retired you should have plenty of time to check your facts before you post them.
I advise you to do so. That would save me much work correcting your worst mistakes.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision The Apollo Missions landing on the Moon are not "an old cold war scam". Of course they really happened. Your campaign here against NASA and US is the real scam.
By now you must know you are wrong. Just admit it.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision You can stop your laughter now because there is no "apollo kodak special film". The missions used normal 70 mm Kodak Ektachrome. It did not fog because there was not enough radiation for that to occur.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Bin Laden was killed in 2011. His death was confirmed by Al-Qaeda.
You are wrong again. And there are many pictures of air planes ramming the WTC from the outside, so it cannot possibly have been an inside job. So you are wrong there too. Like you are wrong about the moon landings being "faked".
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen The US government is Al-Qaeda, too blind to see the truth. So you think with the BEST security system on the planet, a bunch of idiots that don't know how to pilot a small plane, got pass our defenses and rammed two planes into buildings? Then the most secured building in the world that is protected 24-7 was hit and they only have a few frames of video that looks shady ass hell. And all the planes and people disintegrated on impact? You have to be a complete fool to believe that...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Anybody who comes to New York can see with his own eyes that the WTC twin towers are missing. You say they were protected? With antiaircraft artillery? In the middle of Manhattan?
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Never mind, go back to the moon...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I do mind your putting out incorrect statements like this one about WTC being somehow protected from aircraft. It is a lie and you know it.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Dude, I was saying the Pentagon is protected, not the world trading center, what the fuck is the matter with you, LMAO!! Read that shit before you submit dumb shit! I was saying, how could the most secured building in the world, THE PENTAGON, have a plane run into it? You could barely walk pass the bitch let alone fly a plane into it, lol! When you put all that bullshit in your mind at once, it spells CONSPIRACY! But you love government bullshit so it spells STUPID in your mind...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper
"most secured building in the world that is protected 24-7 was hit"
There are antiaircraft guns protecting the Pentagon? I don't think so.
"You could barely fly a plane into it (laughter)," Well, somebody did just that.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Do you have any idea how fast the US can get a fighter jet to these infrastructures and landmarks to protect them from terrorist? The Pentagon has its own protector and they often do drills of a flyby for many reasons. They have a military team trained to protect those power plants, buildings, bridges etc. 24-7 you idiot, lol!! I'm only 17, but you have to about 7, you are too fucking stupid to post a comment. Go troll on an XBOX video, if you even have the sense for that. LMAO!!
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "Do you have any idea how fast the US can get a fighter jet... "
Yes, they took too long, because even the second aircraft had time to collide with WTC.
"And all the planes and people disintegrated on impact" I think they burned because the planes were tanked with enough fuel to fly to California. Maybe the power plants, buildings, bridges etc. were protected 24-7
but that would have required an impregnable force field. :)
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Wrong, it is declassified that the jets to be scrambled was issued an order to stand down by Dick Cheney himself, conformation given by secretary of transportation, Norman Mineta on record, ON VIDEO! Planes don't disintegrate, ((EVER)), not even the smallest ones. And kerosene is not an aid for disintegration. And our force field is our defense that is why it never happen unless it was staged by us. Here in California we have strict laws even on foil balloons, because of tracking.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "the jets to be scrambled was issued an order to stand down"
That is completely irrelevant because the highjacked planes did not stand down.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen WOW, it's a real live, complete idiot... Dude..., the jets that were supposed to save the buildings were ordered to stand down (disengage, don't do anything, stay, don't move etc.) The government didn't want to shot the planes down. Dick Cheney gave that order and over 3000 Americans were killed, because of it. Did you get it that time? Our government are murderous tyrants and you are next on there list. You see dude, to them, you are trash and soon they will take your ass out...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Your arguments must be weak indeed to make you so offensive and unpleasant. There certainly were no jets supposed to save the buildings because noone knew which buildings to save.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Were fighters practicing saving buildings pertaining to the exact targets? Yes... Was this evidence declassified? Yes... Did the world trade center get bombed before? Yes... If so, would they take every possible measure to protect these very valuable infrastructure? Because they know and terrorist knows that these targets could very much so damage the US. I'm not trying to being offensive, you are provoking me to be this way. This debate is over....
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Were fighters practicing saving buildings pertaining to the exact targets? -------------- NO
Did the world trade center get bombed before? ----------------------- Not from the air
would they take every possible measure ------------------ NO, they could not have fighters circling over New York day and night
Your question have the special flavor of complete hindsight.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen You are a fucking idiot, they were practicing, that's DECLASSIFIED YOU IDIOT, LMAO!!!! The fact that the building was bombed before is the reason why they are protecting the building fool! You are not comprehending the points dude! Dude, that's why they scramble jets, they are always on standby. That is why we have air traffic control, to make sure we don't have planes hitting buildings and shit. If a plane get off course, and don't respond, it gets shot down...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper
In this debate you never cited any facts at all and you were personally unpleasant in every way.
"they handed out moon rocks" .......... NOT TRUE
"they were fake" .... NOT TRUE moon rocks cannot be faked anyway
"they destroyed most of the original material on purpose" ..... NOT TRUE, besides "most of" is a bit thick considering that only one copy of many could not be found.
"this debate is over" ....... IT NEVER WAS A DEBATE, JUST YOUR DESPERATE LIES
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Your saying, "NOT TRUE" is no proof, show me some proof that they didn't hand out moon rocks. All you have to do is google fake moon rocks and you will see it all... Take a look and stop yelling out NOT TRUE, because it is true unless you can prove it wrong... Look up NASA destroyed original moon landing material and get back at me. You make me say fucked up shit to you, because you are full of shit all the fucking time... Yeah, you need to fuck off...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper There is no picture of anybody receiving a moon rock from the astronauts.
There are pictures of them handing out miniature flags.
YOU made the statement "they handed out moon rocks" so you prove it then.
NO information was lost. CBS had a copy of the moonwalk.
Your nick is singularly inappropriate, you are not a "guardian" of the truth, far from it, and you certainly are no trooper. You don't stand for anything. You just keep repeating garbage that others have invented.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Dude, stop writing bullshit and research, you didn't research at all. If I can find the shit by just typing it in, it is that easy. Keep searching like you want to find it, you don't want to find the shit. I'm not doing your homework for you, unless you pay me...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I did research and I found queen Juliana receiving a miniature flag from Neil.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "it spells conspiracy"
We know already that you cannot spell, biatch. :))))
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen You point to one word that I misspelled in any of my comments and you will be depicted as the dumb BITCH -(notice the correct spelling) You are completely out of breath, run along and play with your sister or your little pee-pee, whichever comes first, you are losing the rest of your brain cell trying to think...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "how could the most secured building in the world, THE PENTAGON, have a plane run into it?"
Actually two buildings and two planes. The planes were disguised as passenger airliners. In fact, they WERE passenger airliners.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen You must first understand the question, then answer it... You don't get a plane near the Pentagon, it is a no fly zone with permanent watchdogs. Anyone working in that building would tell you that. Answer this question, why did the government confiscated all videos of the hit on the Pentagon and refused to release them? Why did the owners of these videos had to get a court order to get their material back? Why was the video only about 4 frames showing nothing at all?
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I really have no idea why the US government confiscated all videos of the hit on the Pentagon and refused to release them. Maybe they did not like the competition with their own standard video "Flying low to the Pentagon"?
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Then why can't you see it was to coverup something, because there is foul-play in each and every incident in the 911 tragedy. At ground zero, the steel was evidence to a crime scene, but they take it way quickly to be melted down? Evidence of malted steel only triggered by thermite that lasted months after 911. Heat detecting satellite images is proof of this. Plans to depopulate "Genocide," right in our faces. Look up government plastic coffins... These people are sick and hell...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "can't you see it was to coverup something"
There is nothing to cover up, we know how 9/11 happened, even who flew the planes into WTC and Pentagon.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen JUST LAY THERE AND SLEEP, I'M OUT...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen really? then why have several of the hi-jackers been found alive and well huh..... you would have to be blind or brainwashed to think that the official story was true. I'm ashamed at the sheeple in this country that are owned by government findings and news stories.
orange70383 8 months ago
@orange70383 The planes were totally destroyed, noone could have survived the impacts,
The hijackers were in the planes, actually flying them. So they cannot have been found alive and well, no huh about it.
BjornPalmen 8 months ago
@BjornPalmen They were found alive and well because they were not in the impact. It is a fact. They've come forward. Of course CIA run media didnt cover it. Am I the only one who thinks its strange that the so called hijackers were revealed in less than 15 hours after the fact, complete with pics and bios. Sheeple bought the JFK Oswald thing. He was arrested less than 2 hrs after and all further investigations were cancelled if any even existed. Why is it so hard to believe the govt. lies to us?
Ebeneezerable 7 months ago
@Ebeneezerable Somebody must have piloted those air planes into the WTC towers.
If you look at the crashes you can see that nobody could have survived the inpacts.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen Yeah, but you are taking a the govts. word for it. Look up Iran CIA 1953, GUATEMALLA UNITED FRUIT DULLES CIA, MKULTRA. Inform yourself about what US Govt. is really about.Knowledge is power. If you are getting your knowledge from US media/govt. you are being deceived.
Ebeneezerable 7 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The astronauts handed out miniature flags, not ROCKS as you mistakenly say,
Where is YOUR evidence? A picture of a big rock given to queen Juliana perhaps? :)
The original recording of Apollo 11 telemetry was lost, it is your idea that it was erased, They just could not find it after 40 years...
So now you are calling me a liar too. I feel honored to be included with all the astronauts and Nobel prize winners.
On your side there is Mr, Kaysing with his crazy ideas.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
Every single bit of "proof" can be debunked by anybody willing to determine fact from fiction. Anyone willing to understand. Open your eyes and your buttholes.
MrToiletface 9 months ago
@stalkervision He is not alluding to the space program, he is talking about basic scientific research, He says that young people should continue the work getting nearer to the truth, I don't think that includes posting wrong and deeply offensive - and quite stupid - speculations about "lying" astronauts.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision Your comments on the private lives of America's two best astronauts are beneath contempt and total bull shit. How dare you post such offensive garbage?
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision Before you lose your ass completely -- LYAO laughing your ass off -- I must point out to you that the question was "did you see stars in the solar corona" - which was observed from the command module.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@stalkervision The question was if he could see stars when he was observing the solar corona. This was done in space, before the landing. That is why Michael Collins commented that he did not see stars either IN THE SUN'S CORONA.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
"Breakthroughs Available to those who can remove one of truths protective layers" very cryptic and interesting words!
I wonder if he is reffering to a new type of propulsion system.
The big question is why would a better propulsion technology be so secret?
Unless we discovered it in July 1947
KarlUKmidlands 9 months ago
@KarlUKmidlands Scientific research really removes layer after layer to get at the truth:
molecules -> atoms -> electrons and nucleons -> quarks --> ....
or sun -> sun and moon -> solar system -> stars -> our galaxy -> all galaxies -> .....
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
After further research, I found the true "fake Moon Rock" story. IN THE 70'S NASA gave Moon rocks to sevral countries including the Netherlands. Of the dozen or so that went out ONLY ONE turned out to be petrified wood. NASA can only assume a mistake was made, or someone down the line substituted it to keep for themselves.
Funny how ALL the others were actual Moon Rocks. It just shows how CT's can tell only half the story to support their claims. The rest is exageration.
Mozart1220 9 months ago
Again, I see no "guilt" on his face in this video at all.
normbreyfogle 10 months ago
wow totally out of context.
ShniggleStein 10 months ago
It's has to be a good reason why people are apposing this moon landing bullshit. Yes I called it bullshit, because I don't believe it happened. NASA and our world governments do too much stupid bullshit that makes people come up with these conclusions. Our government can put an alcoholic in an ABC store and lock him in for a week to see if he will drink anything. Then tell the world that they cured him and you fools will believe it just because it's the government and it's on TV. IDIOTS...
GUARDIANtrooper 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper the moon landings are supported by more than the "government and tv" as you so simply put it.
amor987654321 10 months ago
@amor987654321 Oh yeah? Well do the math... They said the rocket was supposed to get them pass the Van Allen belts. Ok..., lets say they made it and walked on the moon and put the flag up and everything. Ok..., I understand there is very low gravity in space, but how in the hell did this piss-ass Lunar Module get up to 25,000 miles an hour and 238,857 to earth back pass the Van Allen belts with that little ass fuel tank and made it back to earth without a scratch? I can't wait to hear this...
GUARDIANtrooper 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper also, it was possible to get past the VAB's. previous unmanned trips through the VAB's measured a 200 mSv radiation dose per hour(unprotected ofcourse). avoiding this particle radiation almost entirely was not too hard. the aluminium alloy on apollo was an extremely effective way of negating particle radiation. also their trajectory to the moon and back was at an inclination which passed through the less concentrated areas of the VAB's, traversing them in less than 2 hours.
amor987654321 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper the dosimeters that the astronauts wore measured an average radiation does of 57 mSv for the whole trip(apollo 11 i beleive). also the gamma-ray and x-ray radiation on the surface of the moon was not significant, and was easily avoided with their spacecraft and 23 layer space suits (which they wore for the duration taht they were on the moon). the space suits were also made out of various metal and plastic thread. had a temperature control system etc etc.
amor987654321 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper the "piss ass" lunar module, which was actually an amazing piece of enginuity, didnt reach 25,000 mph. for rondevouz with the command module (in lunar orbit), all it had to do was lift-off from the moon, pitch over, and obtain a speed of 3,600 mph, the speed required to be caught into lunar orbit. and at not a very high altitude either. once connected. the CSM only has to perform 1 burn and a few course corrections to get back to 25k mph and travel to earth.
amor987654321 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper biatch
amor987654321 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Really? Tell you what. Do some research. You'll learn the the LEM didn't do any of those things you mentioned because it didn't have to! It dodn't have to reach 25,000 mph, and was jettisoned BEFORE they made the return trip in the Comand Service module. You "hoaxers" are really stretching aren't you? Why not just give up?
Mozart1220 10 months ago
@Mozart1220 We won't give up, because whistleblowers put too much evidence that it was a hoax. And..., the hoaxers are the ones doing the conspiracies and the whole landing process and the so-called rendezvous was said to be complete FAKED, by professional analysts of many scientific classes. You are here because you read the title which means you have doubts of your own. You are just waiting for a good reason to jump or waiting for a strong whistleblower like Neil Armstrong to spill it...
GUARDIANtrooper 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper WHICH "professional anaysts"? Got any names? WHAT "scientific classes"? I'm here because someone e-mailed me the link and said "Look! Another Moon Hoaxer MORON." Your "theories" have been shot down so many tiimes it's HILARIOUS! "No stars in the photos" Jeez, man, a kid in a third grade photography class could refute that! Non Parallell shadows? They aren't parallel on Earth when THE GROUND IS UNEVEN. Not even the Netherlands think a fake the rock means it's a hoax!
Mozart1220 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The "completely faked" rendezvous in orbit around the Moon was repeated six times without trouble: Apollo 11, Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17 all did it.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The LM rode with the Command Module and together they accelerated to 25 000 mph to leave the earth's gravity. The little fuel tank just brought the LM in for landing and then up and back into orbit to rendezvous with the CM. No great mystery here.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I don't think a guy who thinks the LEM came all the way back from the Moon and that the Moon landing was a hoax can call anyone else an "idiot".
Mozart1220 10 months ago
@Mozart1220 That's just it, you don't think, you have them thinking for you... You would probably call Neil Armstrong a liar if he comes out and says, "it was all a lie..." Sleep on it for the duration of these hard time in your fighting thoughts, I've transformed. Mark my word, something will convince you and your head in their astronaut visor will morph into a JACKASS, I'll be that fly on the wall shaking my head. No I didn't tell you so, they did, but you ignored their lies...
GUARDIANtrooper 10 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Wow...all that and almost no point or proof of your claims at all! Just you saying I don't think and you call me a jackass. very nice. I'll tell you what. My Mom worked for Collins Radio (Now Rockwell) during the 60's. She was INVOLVED in the space program. I got to meet some of these people like Pete Conrad and Charlie Duke. I have some hard news for you. THESE MEN WALKED ON THE MOON. Tell me this, WHY do you think it's impossible? PROOF, not BS please.
Mozart1220 9 months ago
@Mozart1220 Where is the proof that they did land on the moon besides those obvious sketchy/FAKE ass pictures and videos that were dissected by so many great scientist of all branches of science. If you want to believe this bullshit, that's your prerogative, be a fool of Hollywood trickery, you aren't the only fool on earth, look forward to that I guess... If you can't be a skeptic to reason to understand a little better, then at least pretend you are capable to conjure up some common sense...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The proof is in the fact that they WENT! They brought back rocks and left instruments there. WHAT pictures were "dissected" by WHOM? Please tell me you aren't still claiming there should be stars in the sky, or that the shadows should all be black. Please tell me you have at least gotten through middle school science. Not to mention the fact that the Russians were tracking all our spacecraft, just like we were tracking theirs. Are you saying they were in on the hoax?
Mozart1220 9 months ago
@Mozart1220 Mini answer are played out, try again... Those so-called lunar rocks were named petrified wood, busted by some of the best analyst that had to gusts to say so. You can setup a lunar set anywhere on this earth and take pictures and videos, dumb answer. All the videos and pictures were dissected, this is not the only video on Youtube you know. After you realized that you didn't record stars on the first mission, why didn't you get a better camera for the second? Leaders aren't Russian.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Actually, the petrified wood thing cane from a "gift" given by a "NASA staffer" RIGHT AFTER APPOLO 11 CAME BACK. Now think about it, the FIRST moon landing. Do you REALLY think NASA is giving out actual Moon rocks that are that rare? No. And there is no way to take pictures of an astronaut in a white suit on the Moon and show any stars! it's not about the quality of the camera, it's about the fact that the exposure wouldn't allow it! It's DAYTIME on the Moon. Wow.
Mozart1220 9 months ago
@Mozart1220 No, the rocks were observed by hundreds of scientists and many came forward after one of the rocks got into the possession of a museum, which was confirmed by NASA to be an authentic moon rock and tested by the museum as being petrified wood. The astronauts gave out the rocks to important people. Keep that in mind, fake rocks, you can have all you want we can make more, right? The moon is not as bright as they claim it to be, or the pictures wouldn't come out at all, more bullshit.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I ask you again, do you REALLY think NASA would allow astorauts to GIVE AWAY rocks that are more valuable than the rarest diamond? Do you REALLY think that even if they were inclined to do so they would do it after the FIRST mission? Do you REALLY think the government would ALLOW them to do so after spending so much money and risking the very lives of the people who went? I looked up your little tale, and it's exactly as I said. Whoever gave out petrified wood wasn't NASA.
Mozart1220 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The astronauts handed out no rocks at all. They gave away 135 different flags that had been on the moon mission.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "why didn't you get a better camera"
Actually that is exactly what they did.
Apollo 16 took uv-light pictures of the Earth in the configuration called Capricorn.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "After you realized that you didn't record stars..."
The moon missions were about the moon, not about stars. They of course navigated by the stars, they had star charts on board. The moon has no air so all uv radiation is coming through. Apollo 16 had a camera with uv sensistive film and took picgtures of he Capricorn stars and Earth.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GUARDIANtrooper: "why didn't you get a better camera for the second? "
We got a uv-sensitive camera for Apollo 16. It showed stars in the Capricorn constellation.
BjornPalmen 2 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper A pretty good proof that they landed was that they took parts of the Moon back with them, And it was not cheese either, it was solid moon rocks, Lots of them.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Then why did they give people petrified wood then? You have to understand, I don't believe in the moon landing so I don't believe in moon rocks. Any piece of meteorite could be named a lunar rock or bullshit they made up in a lab or whatever. Point is, if a few moon rocks is all the evidence you have of a moon landing and all the bullshit photos and videos that suggests foul play is mine, you lose that battle. Better luck on another government hoax, you probably believe them all...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The astronauts never gave away moon rocks to ANYBODY, ok? The rocks were distributed to geologists all over the world. They are much too important to be given away as souvenirs.
Lunar rocks have been millions of years on the lunar surface so they are quite different from earth rocks.
The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal ALSJ has all the pictures and videos from the SIX missions to the Moon,
Google "ALSJ" and you will find all proof you need. We really went to the moon! Six times!
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Yes they did, they handed out moon rocks to a lot of people when they went on tours, FACT... The rocks were part of the hoax. They were small enough to give away, they had plenty, they were FAKE... ALSJ, don't have all the videos, because they destroyed most of the original material on purpose, what are you talking about? I'm not going to google a bunch of fake bullshit, that's why I'm here, to shine the light on this hoax. You people love defending bullshit lies, the end is near.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You say "I'm not going to google". Then I have nothing more to say to you!
The moon rocks are certainly not fakes, the are sent geologists (actually selenologists) all over the world.
There is really no way to fake moon rocks, because you must fake millions of years of bombardment by micrometeors. And that takes time :). ALSJ has a lot of videos, none of them were "destroyed on purpose".
What would be the point of destroying fake videos? :D
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen You said, "I don't have nothing more to say to you, " and then you write me a book? LMAO!! Lets say they did go to the moon... Who is to say that some of those rocks weren't fragments of meteorites on the moon or impact collision? The moon acts as a shield against astroids and meteoroids and some of the debris do fall to earth, right? Even some of the lunar rocks or giant boulders like fragments could've been dragged along for the ride if they didn't get burned up in the trail.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "some of the debris do fall to earth, right?" Right, but nobody can find them. Typically the most recent meteorites fell thousands of years ago.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen A thousand years ago, LMAO!! Just a few months ago a pretty sizable meteor hit the road here in California and they had the whole place blocked off. They wouldn't even let you get out of the car to go near it. But what's worse, It didn't even make mainstream media, I wonder why? Most fragments burn up in the atmosphere, but the larger ones get by and if the environment that it pass through or strike is right, it could stay in tact. Government rock collectors aren't honest dude...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I am of course referring to meteorites that can be found and analyzed, not shooting stars in California. The meteors that are found are in museums now and they are pretty old.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "the astronauts handed out moon rocks to a lot of people when they went on tours, FACT"
That is a lie and you know it. Can you find a picture of ANYBODY of these lots of people actually receiving a rock? No you cannot! And your use of "FACT" after writing complete bull shit is offensive. I really think you should apologize.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen You are right, I'm sorry... That your parents created an idiot... Call me a liar will you... You need to check your shit before you submit. I don't talk shit unless I research, you are just speculating a bunch of bullshit. You calling me a liar is not the right answer fool... You need to find the Wizard of Oz and get you a brain to think on your own, because the government is holding that end for you... Use the FORCE or something, let go... Trust me... LMAO!!
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Two months ago GUARDIANtrooper said "astronauts handed out moon rocks to a lot of people". THAT WAS A LIE. Two months later he has still not found a single picture of anybody receiving a rock from an astronaut. Because it never happened. End of story.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen
moon rocks are the most valuable piece of mineral on the planet, small fragments are worth a fortune so no, the astronauts did not hand them out to a lot of people, the government had very tight control over them.
I think they Apollo team members should have been given rings with a moon rock in them that'd of been cool hell Super Bowl rings are a big deal what about a moon ring?
Blahblobify 7 months ago
@Blahblobify The Moon rocks are too valuable to be used as gem stones.
New rocks will not be coming for some time.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@BjornPalmen
Well they brought back over 800 lbs of them would it have killed the US/NASA to give the Apollo astronauts a 1 carat moon rock in a ring to commemorate their achievement?
Blahblobify 7 months ago
@Blahblobify That is a very good idea. But the rings should not be gratis. Nasa should charge for them what they would be worth in gold. The money should go to the MMM, the Manned Mission to Mars in 2015.
BjornPalmen 7 months ago
@Blahblobify do you really believe they landed on the moon ? i think they hoaxed it
mutchie6g 6 months ago
@mutchie6g If you think that the US faked SIX MOON LANDINGS and every country on FUCKING EARTH didn't catch on then you are an idiot.
Blahblobify 6 months ago
@Blahblobify you are an ignorant fool
spacehopperballs 6 months ago
@BjornPalmen Hate to interupt you while you talk to yourself, but you are truly a dumb ass. Guess you never googled fake Dutch moon rock now have you?
un4g1v3n1 3 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 You are the dumb ass that blocks all my replies! I know about the moon rock which actually was red petrified wood. That makes it impossible hat it came from the moon. The relatives of a Dutch minister found it after his death in his belongings and immediately assumed it was a moon rock.
I guess they did not know that there never were any petrified forests on the moon.
BjornPalmen 3 months ago
@BjornPalmen "You are the dumb ass that blocks all my replies!" Hmmm, with manners like that I wonder why anyone would block you? Hmmm. Your answer is shit by the way. That 'moon rock' was kept as it was. It's simply the fact that the milli vanilli astronuts didn't have any moon rocks, as they were unavailable on the moonset. However, petrified wood was laying around all over the desert. That you cannot fathom the fakery is your own ignorance, and misfortune!
un4g1v3n1 3 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 "astronauts didn't have any moon rocks, as they were unavailable"
The 12 astronauts that landed brought almost half a ton of "unavailable" moon rock.
I think no fakery was intended, those Dutch persons just made a mistake.
BjornPalmen 3 months ago
@BjornPalmen Since you are incapable of investing the minimal amount of time required to understand the ACTUAL environment of space within the PLASMA RADIATION LADEN Van Allen Radiation betls, or the GCR/SOLAR PARTICLE LADEN space beyond them, you will continue to buy the Apollo BULLSHIT STORY. And since you are incapable of googling Von Braun, and moon rocks, you will continue to refuse to admit that the rocks being used to perpetuate your mythical story were collected two years prier to A11.
un4g1v3n1 3 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 " the ACTUAL environment of space within the PLASMA RADIATION LADEN Van Allen Radiation betls, or the GCR/SOLAR PARTICLE LADEN space " - and the SEALoperated BIN LADEN mission?
BjornPalmen 3 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 - "the trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in the region and less than 2 hours in the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage.
The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is nonsense."
James A. Van Allen
WillShakespeare2007 1 month ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You really think that the astronauts destroyed most of the original material on purpose?
Because that is what you wrote. The astronauts "destroyed most of the original material on purpose"... give me strength... How does it feel to continuously produce garbage and bull shit about the space program and call it FACT? Do you sleep well in the night?
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen I didn't say the astronauts destroyed shit, with your non-comprehending ass, LMAO!! The astronauts/pawns were just actors on a set. NASA destroyed the originals and now they magically have digital remastered video for all you viewing needs and purposes, WHAT A FUCKING JOKE... I'm going to play my XBOX fuck the moon, LMAO!!
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You just said "I didn't say the astronauts destroyed shit"
But this IS what you said yesterday:
"Yes they did, they handed out moon rocks to a lot of people when they went on tours, FACT... The rocks were part of the hoax. They were small enough to give away, they had plenty, they were FAKE... ALSJ, don't have all the videos, because they destroyed most of the original material on purpose, what are you talking about?"
Get your lies straight at least!
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Dude! Not the astronauts, NASA/government, you need to stop snorting that moon dust, LMAO! And stop quoting me, you seem like a machine, loosen up a bit, breath, ahhhhhhh and state your argument. I don't hate anyone on here, I just can't believe something that's even remotely appealing to be a lie. I don't have any lies to straighten, but I could surely point them out, especially if they are wrapped in bullshit. Joke: Why didn't Russia go to the moon? Because Area 51 was occupied...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper There are hundreds of good pictures on in the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, the ALSJ (you can google ALSJ). They are the actual, complete 70 mm film cassettes from the Hasselblads and no picture is censored or changed.
So you are COMPLETELY WRONG with your half-baked ideas of Hollywood trickery and you should apologize.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen Apoligize?! To whom, to you?! LMAO!! All those pictures were analyzed by some of the best analysts and scientists that had the guts to come forward. They all concluded there are major problems in many aspects of the pictures. The technician found in one of the so-called moon landers' visor with no backpack and wearing black boots and a sleeveless jacket is quite a joke to laugh at. When you lie, you bleed more lies. Lies want to be seen and it will come from under the coverings...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper "the technician found in one of the so-called moon landers' visor with no backpack and wearing black boots and a sleeveless jacket is quite a joke"
The joke is on you because there simply is no such picture. "Sleeveless jacket" indeed,
IMO you should apologize to all astronauts for spreading such vicious lies about them.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You said "Apologize?! To whom, to you?"
Actually you should apologize to everybody here for spreading all these incorrect statements,
You never checked ANYTHING, now did you?
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen GOD HELP US...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You need God's help in order to correct all the incorrect statements you have made here?
This is one of the your worst, you said this one week ago:
"The rocks were part of the hoax. They were small enough to give away, they had plenty, they were FAKE... ALSJ, don't have all the videos, because they destroyed most of the original material on purpose"
NOT ONE WORD OF THIS WAS TRUE. APOLOGIZE!
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@BjornPalmen ............................
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Your apology is accepted.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GUARDIANtrooper So you still believe the LEM came all the way back from the Moon!
This can be 1. because you are not REALLY interested. 2. You are just stupid.
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Please remove your tin foil hat before posting. It will help, trust me.
Mozart1220 9 months ago
@Mozart1220 Why don't you put a tin foil hat on and just maybe it would give you some reception of common knowledge that your pathetic brain is lacking. Or maybe it could help you keep your foot out of your ass and the other foot out of your mouth. Trust me, it would be an improvement versus your lame ass suggestions... If you want to make a point, stand in front of a mirror to get a better view of fool you are referring to...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show