Graphs Of Global Temperature And CO2 Levels

[1000frolly]

After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of unknown factors,inserting divergent proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projected results,which we then averaged. We utilized the liberally unprincipled component method to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a new hockey stick,which gave a very robust prediction (95% probability) that we are totally screwing all of you

[U1T001]

RE: 'the quote of Goebbles'

It is not funny & where is the lie.

CO2 in the atmosphere in the recent years is continuously increasing (Where is the lie?). How far will this go? The oceans get acidified & what does that mean?

If we don't switch over to another energy source soon (solar or hydrogen) we may come to the 'event horizon'.

A lot of energy (carbon footprint) has been wasted to supply people with cars to burn even more CO2. This could have been used to switch over to another energy source

[Rhal95]

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." - J Goebblels

I don't like Mr Gore lying to me from his new mansion at sea level !

All scientists DO NOT agree with Global warming: watch/QuOnvlleiGY

Temprature drives CO2, not visa-versa: watch/IUp9CiKcjoE

Ice is growing: watch/6Vgmvy8hQwU

And this is all normal: watch/tTp5h9BuQtQ

We still need to get off hydrocarbon fuels. But not for a lie :: Not with a carbon tax.

[Windwalker57]

Can't see the forest for the trees! Its not that Co2 causes global warming, its that co2 levels keep going up and we cannot survive in over what is it 800ppm?

[1000frolly]

@Windwalker57

Where did you get this absolute nonsense from?

Did you know that when you breathe out, it is 32,000 ppm CO2?

Humans can live or work quite well up to 12,500 ppm, this is the enforced CO2 gas limit in coal mines.

[Nightversionn]

...Geological Society of America * American Astronomical Society * American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) * Stratigraphy Commission - Geological Society of London ...

[wolfmweh]

Such a low rating? how odd.

5* ...real science and good music :)

[hatchi58]

TEMPERATURE PEAKED 11 YEARS AGO.

water and co2 are good for the earth.

none of these graphs show anything beyond 2000. thats because the jig is up- global warming is a fraud designed to steall all of our freedoms and money.

I bow to no globalist.

[drsangle]

I'm glad I'm old enough to have gone to school when they taught real science and had pride enough of our job and ourselves to put 12 men and two used cars on the moon.

They've killed 14 so far flying a cargo rocket. Oh well S**T happens.

It's not that there are those willing to promote a fraud but all those that believe them. Let's see what was that other guy's name Bernie something, or U.S. Congress. Insanity takes two to participate.

What a waste of so much wealth and a society.

[daobagua]

The graph obviously used the new digital thermostats with the attached time travel machine to detect the temperature in the past. Man its so obvious.

[alexkittybag]

although co2 is a factor so it would seem that the recent warming must be partly due to co2 as it cannot be explained by the sun.

[UKRentor1605]

Actually, solar activity has followed the earths temperature remarkably perfectly. we experienced a spike in solar activity at the beginning of the 1900's, along with an increase in global temperature. from about the 40's to 70's, solar activity decreased, as did temperatures, and starting in the 80's up until about 2001 there was a massive increase in solar activity and in temperature increase. Solar activity went down in the past decade and so have global temperatures.

[alexkittybag]

co2 levels have increased since the industry revoloution and the general trend of temperature has increases slightly as well. sun spot acitivity for the past thousand years has explained temperature quite well as the trends roughly matched each others, however they dont now in the past century (temperature has increased more than the sun spots would have predicted). co2 never seemed to drive climate in the past as al gores graphs accidently show.

[amazinnblazin]

Hooray, warmer so more places can grow more food, less snow for the slopes, but meh, ok

[theaznfishy]

People who listen to Al Gore are imbeciles. He's the source of global asswarming.

[singemajeep]

These graphs are miss leading because they appear to say that when we splurt out c02 the temperature rises but in fact when the temperature rises more c02 is present.

[Ledwix]

Uh, it's interesting. The thing I don't get is how people could possibly measure the temperature and amount of CO2 present thousands of years ago.

[BlackDragon794]

For all you dumb democrats who think this is real, you need to get a life. First of all, more scientists believe it is fake, its like 10 to 1. I think Al Gore just made up these graphs to have a chance of becoming president. Im not falling for it.

[barbaralovesblack]

Why the fuck has this stupidity got to do with dems? If you think there's ANY difference between the two parties, you're too stupid to breathe.

[James9067]

In the Us it may be 10:1. But worlwide it must be 10 believe and 1 doesn't. Why because in most country people aren't closed in their huge houses with air conditionner and they actually have contact with the weather, and throughout the world people do notice things are worse and that its happening fast. and this is why except the fuckass china and United-states, people are trying to change their habits for the good. Go in the place called outside and you'll see beyong the climatisation!!!!!!!!!!

[aerosmith37]

i like how its mostly all co2 global warming is fake, its just the world doing what it needs to do, it did like 65 million years ago

[aaronjamesmoore]

I think if you look at the past 1-2 thousand years it looks like a hockey stick. The problem I have is with the graphs for periods before that. Take this one for example. It appears that the climate has shifted quite a few degrees in the thousands and thousands of years previously. If there have been so many great climate fluctuations in the past then does it really matter if we change it by a few degrees? Can someone more educated help me out? see graph here: scotese. com/ climate. htm

[IWantGod]

The thing is, nobody really knows for sure what the temperatures were like since we started measuring them, which was in the past 200 or so years.

Some people, like if you search for 'global warming- doomsday called off' got different information than the hockey stick graph, from ice cores and tree rings.

What I want to know is how did that graph project so far back into the past? Is it really concrete evidence? The website doesn't say, so I can't really form a conclusion there.

[tubfalbusen]

10 hottest years in US History 1. 1934 2. 1998 3. 1921 4. 2006 5. 1931 6. 1999 7. 1953 8. 1990 9. 1938 10. 1939

[ImnotBritish12225]

We are (or were) exiting the little ice age. So of course the temperature is rising. Also CO2 levels increase from increases in temperature, not the other way around.

[tubfalbusen]

10 hottest years in US History 1. 1934 2. 1998 3. 1921 4. 2006 5. 1931 6. 1999 7. 1953 8. 1990 9. 1938 10. 1939

[thefuturehasarrived]

They are not all 'hockey stick' lines. Some are just straight up and some are a bit zigzaggy. It's not like they all just copied the same graph to try to prove a point.

[minilemur]

This is dreadful junk science. Several of the hockey stick graphs have been shown to be statistically and scientifically unsound, so much so that even the IPCC has removed it (after having featured it 6 times in its 3rd report) from it's current 4th report. The truth is that CO2 does not statistically correlate with temperature. Check out CO2 science and Friends of Science websites for instance, for access to better graphs.

[zupf]

World Climate Report "But, the "hockey stick" was remarkable. And as such, it will be remembered as a remarkable lesson in how fanaticism can temporarily blind a large part of the scientific community & allow unproven results to become mainstream thought overnight. The embarrassment that it caused to many scientists working in the field of climatology will not be soon forgotten."

[adrianjemond]

thnaks for posting this because it is true

[SteveWrathall]

You're just repeating the same discredited "hockey stick" graph in different colours. Pathetic

[thefuturehasarrived]

I'm sorry you think my video is pathetic however I did not just repeat the same graph in different colours. I was wondering what the evidence was for global warming so I did a google image search for global temperatures. The graphs are from many different sources. I am aware that there are many reasons why people say its not true and am interested in hearing more about those reasons. I just cannot find any graphs with 'more accurate' temperature readings.

[SteveWrathall]

They may be generated from different sources, but they use the same erroneous data set.

[thefuturehasarrived]

Ok any idea where I can find the correct data set?

[Imabloodyhuman]

I'm sure you could find it at the offices of Exxon or Shell or BP or Chevron.........unless they've already burned it.

[CEGreen26]

@thefuturehasarrived exactly.... most people don't understand science... its too bad because our future depends on them more than us