Added: 2 years ago
From: mpgomatic
Views: 583,064
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (690)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 4 seconds? bad speedometer.

  • its a really sloppy acceleration vehicle. 6.2 is uneven and it doesnt sound that great

  • Put a GPS on this for starters...it's a GM car, you can't trust anything on it.

  • that digital speedometer was so in accurate

  • Comment removed

  • Huh? My 09 GTi wasn't far from that. Plus I got 30+ mpg.

  • hahahahahha omg nice shifting!!

  • you sir, bought a terrible car. congratulations

  • shite speedo

  • @wokeupthismorning100 i know mustangs have em too i hate new car speedos

  • 3.9 seconds 0-60, simply brutal.

  • @LilProveInn You mean 5 seconds?

  • @LilProveInn 11 seconds to 16 seconds in video as well as a stopwatch, little under 5 seconds.

  • 0-21mph in 0.0 secs

  • @levimakestuff he spent to much on the car cant afford it

  • That has to be the worst instrument cluster I have ever seen!

  • @johnniesi You probably wouldn't have liked the 60s-70s then :D

  • I drove one o these today and omg!!!! I was amazed..

  • I also want an invisible clutch pedal on my manuals...

  • so this vid is about the camaro..... not everyone else car... i dont car how fast, slow, fat, small, heavy, light, year, make, model. lets see the camaro!

  • you guys suck at posting comments... that actually matter

  • hurray! 2011 camaro 2ss costs 22000 euros in the us. in the netherlands it costs 85000 euros!

  • @Arthedes Good God WHY? Its not worth nearly that much!

  • @hundvonkrieg because we have al lot of immigrants and they need houses and an income too, and instead of getting, work, they get benefits

  • @Arthedes nee man je hebt er nu al een rond de 50 duizend euro

  • @bjornke123456789 ja maar een nieuwe niet en haat gaat even om de nieuwprijs

  • @Arthedes nou in belgie heb je een nieuwe voor 50

  • @bjornke123456789 ja maar in belgie heb je geen co2 tax en geen bpm... en geen linkse partijen... helemaal geen regering eigenlijk :P

  • @Arthedes das waar xd

  • @levimakestuff Who gives a shit about his shoes when his car can do that?

  • That was kind of crap and its the same size engine as a ZR1 :3

  • @emokTheKid The ZR1 is supercharged and the camaro is not so it is gonna be crap

  • @specialbrownbeef Not to mention lighter. I think..

  • I love the engine in the Camaro but I really really hate the interior finish for the price Im paying...its too bad the Camaro isnt well finished..

  • @bacvain Much better than the Challenger's interior, and it costs ~$15k more, and it's not even as fast. ;)

  • wow this is there most viewed video

  • XD my 2011 Rs goes 0-60 in 5.8 :P

  • The sound made when that launch control button is pressed sums up american cars. :D

    That said. i love muscle cars and no country makes them better than the states. don't think i would want to own one though.

  • wow that was so fast i think i could've made a damn pizza and come back to see the end of the clip...

  • dat 0-20

  • Guys... welcome to EU... Did you think that the fat-asses in Bruxelles paliament are free?

  • thats not 4.6 sec.

  • Wow, these comments are...not very smart...haha

  • dude a camaro wud beat an Evo. muscle cars are not about their jump start but they pick up speed alot quicker than tuners. thats why they are called muscle cars. hes right. the Evo wud beat the camaro untill about 30mph then the camaro wud pick up some serious speed. and R34??? those werent made untill like 2000! and they werent GTR! GTR is only the R35. this guy needs to knw his shit a lil better. we know now that we cant talk to you about cars... lol

  • @mustangfanatic04 Look up some videos of EVO's, I've seen some that are terrifying fast and they way significantly less than the Camaros. It would be a close race stock, but with slight mods an EVO can easily crush a camaro

  • @rsmith1240 ya but were talking about stock cars man. a stock camaro ss wud smoke an evo... muscle cars pick up speed after about 3rd gear. yuh have no idea. my friend has a camaro and he is always dusting little v4 and v6.

  • @mustangfanatic04 How can you make such a generic statement like "muscle cars pick up speed after 3rd gear and they're called muscle cars bc they pick up speed quicker than tuners? Are you retarded? Z06 or ZR1 will go to 60 in first gear and it does that in the 3 second range, that's pretty damn fast. Stock the SS 0-60 varies from 4.6-5.2, 1/4 mile 13.1-13.4, 2010 EVO 4.6 0-60 and 13.2 in the 1/4. That's close enough that either one could win depending on the driver.

  • @rsmith1240 fuck a evo i smoked my boys evo in my 01 camaro ss all there good for is playin in the dirt or snow thats it they r by no means a race/drag car they were not built for that

  • @rsmith1240 wtf. my 2011 challengerRT does it in 5.24 check out my vids!

  • @mustangfanatic04 Just search evo vs camaro and the 3rd vid down is an evo destroying a Camaro and a Corvette. They pick up speed alot quicker than tuners? That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. It's scary how ignorant some of you are.

  • @rsmith1240 lets talk stock cars and even if they were not stock if u put the same 5 grand u put in an evo and put it in a camaro wtf do u think would happen and thats all motor imagine if u put a blower or turbo on a camaro u cant argue your way outta that on lets see

  • @TheBassking86 I was talking about stock cars and gave you stock times, but I was only talking about the EVO IX GSR, I never said anything about your Camaro. The numbers are very close between that and a SS and it would come down to driver. Who knows what kind of evo you raced, it may have been the NA one. I'm just saying I've seen EVOs do some stupid shit, I've seen some Camaros do some stupid shit, it all depends on mods. Why would a lighter, AWD car not go 0-60 faster?

  • @mustangfanatic04 And just FYI, Skylines have had GTR in the name since they debuted in 1969, including the 1999 Skyline R34 GT-R.

    What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  • @rsmith1240 bro, it is depending on the driver, but if yuh had the same driver driving both cars, yuh wud see that the camaro wud prevail. and dude why are yuh so stuck on the mitsubishi evo? mitsubishi has one of the worst reputations ever. their cars always have some sort of transmission problem. starting wit the eclipse, galant, and mirage. what makes evo so different? honda and nissan are the best japanese makings there are. even toyota is having difficulties now adays.

  • @mustangfanatic04

    Americans don't no shit about skylines... R34 came out in 98 and the GTR was the top of the line model. The GTR line goes back to the R32 and before that the R31 GTS-R. I wouldn't expect much intelligence from a mustang owner.

  • @codydouglass ok, I'm an American I know plenty about Skylines, so you should get your facts straight about Americans before you run your mouth, import boy.

  • @codydouglass haha funnry guy

    what car you own?

    a honda? go make rice

  • Adidas... Make them last..

  • no wonder no 2010 camaro's wanna go with my talon

  • dude a freakin mustang wud whoop this shit. the Camaro is a very heavy car for its power. you should get a mustang instead. alot lighter and more comfortable, not to mention better performance.

  • So sexy

  • A 2003 Lancer Evolution VIII and a 1994 Skyline R34 GTR can beat that in

    a heartbeat.

  • @phsycoticrackers Get your facts straight, there's no R34 GTR in 1994..

  • @phsycoticrackers lol u do realize that the oringial gtr's werent sold in america, second 94 skyline GTR would be a R32 model

  • @phsycoticrackers

    My bolt on ls1 rapes bolt on evo's so, what now?

  • @phsycoticrackers r34 ? 1994? if you dont know what your talking about atleast google it first

  • @phsycoticrackers the evo would really only have an advantage in the first 20 MPH. after that, the camaro will accelerate faster

  • @phsycoticrackers

    yea right

    astock 03 evo can beat a camaro "stock"?

    i think you got your numbers mixed up

    R34 in 1994.. ???

    wtf get your history corrected dude lol

  • @phsycoticrackers

    Lancer EVO is rally inspired car, and it's not made for drag. Camaro SS is faster in straight, slower than EVO at corners, handling (Nurburgring Nordesh. lap times), same thing is with R34 (GT-R, GT-S and other models, which is produced from 1999 to 2002).

  • I think it get get up 7500 rpm not 6200

  • That has manual transmission?

  • @imbloy542 obviously lol not tryna be an ass but u do see 3 pedals right?

  • Dang! That how you start every car on your 0-60 run?

  • 6.2 liter??? damn, you better put a trailer hitch on the back of that. That big ass gas guzzling engine wants to pull something.

  • @stevenmorookian16 lol yeah bc 24 mpg hwy is so low for a car with 426 hp

  • @grenade350 Even better, you could become a more efficient scrapper.

  • @stevenmorookian16 lol nah the idea is 426 hp with 24 mpg hwy - unmatched by anything with less than 5.0 L dude (Mustang Boss 302). Big engines run at low rpm for cruising so they use little fuel - a Vette is rated 26 hwy, with 436 hp from 6.2L. It isn't hard to squeeze an avg over 30 mpg from a hwy trip if you keep it at a reasonable speed! 6.2L! Look it up.

    It only guzzles gas when you mash it. Or if you actually did pull huge loads with it - check GM's V8-powered trucks

  • @grenade350 yeah I have an 4.9 liter inline 6 and use it to pull heavy loads (5000 lb bobcat on 1500 lb trailer with bed full of scrap metal) all the time. I know all about keeping it at low rpms. I get really good gas mileage for a truck. But yeah every rotation of the crank shaft of a 4 cylinder has 2 combustion strokes compared to 4 combustion strokes of a v8.

  • @stevenmorookian16 True. But it's important to remember that for any given power output (say, the 17 or so hp to cruise at 50 mph) the 4 cyl must work harder foritself than the 8cyl. Any given power output - a unit of energy per unit of time - comes from about the same amount of fuel. The differences btw a small 4 and a big 8 are from the 8's pumping losses and more friction (moving parts). My mother's 09 Camry 4cyl gets just around 8% better around town driving than my '95 Z28 with a 5.7L V-8

  • @grenade350

    Because heavier cars needs more torque, to keep MPG lower as possible. Light cars under 2200 Ibs don't need anything bigger than 4 cyls. Also modern technology using VGT turbochargers on small engines, making them more efficient than any bigger engine with same or higher power/torque. Also V8 engine are not made to efficient. Camry is heavy car, they should stick with V6.

  • dam my 01 ss does 0-60 faster glad i didnt get the new one

  • lol little clutch grindnn

  • Hit the rev limiter before every shift, Whats up with that? Car would be faster if it wasn't doing that... Where you manually shifting it?

  • fuarrkkkkk difference between the v6 and the v8! gotta love ur american muscle cars!! :) I'm from Australia btw haha

  • Start your stopwatches when you see the RPMS drop from 4k... you'll get 5 seconds.

  • I got 5 seconds.

  • looks like a 6 sec car to me

  • @obamaFTWlol

    There was no chirp of the tires or audible screech when the speedometer flickered up and back down.

  • I counted 1.235 seconds to 60mph... WOW thats really fast...

  • Not bad, Launch control works fair from what I can tell. I have speedos of my essentially stock truck doing 60 in this time so I'm actually quite happy.

  • well he did start at 11 and something seconds...and it reached it at about 16.. so that makes it roughly 5 sec....

  • @obamaFTWlol

    Wheelspin or not it still should only read how fast the car is going...

  • @leaf16nut no it will not - seeing as though the speed sensor is on the output shaft of the transmission, if the wheels spin, the speed sensor will show an increase in speed, but the car will not be doing that speed.

  • i counted about 5 1/2 seconds 0-60.... not bad

  • Funny, my 1989 20th Anniversary Pontiac Turbo Trans Am went 0-60 in 4.6 seconds....and it was a V-6 LOL! They also topped out at 161mph at Indy during the test trials before it paced the race....in 100% stock form. :-)

  • whats the top few cars youve tested?

  • Beautiful car, just barely beat one this morning by about a car length in my M3. Love the sound of a V8 with a good exhaust.

  • @Maxgreenlawns why would you flag this video ... If you dint like it, don't click in the link.

  • 5 seconds flat

  • That's 0-80

  • @Cidredd3

    Why stop at 60?

  • 5.2 according to my stopwatch.

  • @MPGOMATIC STOP MAKING STUPID VIDEOS OF STUPID CAR THE HAS V6S IN THEM IT IS SO STUPID I MIGHT FLAG YOUR VIDEOS AS INAPPROPIATE

  • @maxgreenlawns Jeeze, somebody drives a Prius.

  • @maxgreenlawns You honestly think thats the performance and sound of a V6 Camaro? You need to quit watching car videos...

  • i like mine better ;)

    youtube>

    losmt2 - Dodge Stealth R/T tt 0 to 70mph pt2

  • who cares about his shitty shoes lol, i know guys with 200k sports cars who dont care about clothes and i know guys with 10 million dollar mansions who dont care about carsss

  • @snipeyoass420 yeah haha ive seen millionaires rolling around mid 90's suburbans before ha

  • @freak777power And at the end of the day its an eclipse.

  • @freak777power

    No one cares about your cracker jack toy.

  • fastest 0-20 time ever

  • @synawat it's called wheel spin

  • @kyleisreallycool it's called a joke

  • @synawat subaru and other awd vehicles have it beat lolz

  • lol, it hit 60+ twice...

    Pretty accurate car ya got there Chevrolet!

  • its 5.0 seconds sharp (stopwatch)

  • i got about a high 4 to a low 5

  • was actually a 0-80 run. badass car

  • approximately 3.2 sec.?

    

  • u should rename the video 30- 80 mph run lol sry im bored :P

  • Wtf are you idiots talking about? Ya'll counting way too fast its damn near 4 seconds flat, not 6... or maybe your internet runs slow XD.

  • manual cars = men's car .....nice one dude !

  • don't now what everyone is talking about i got about 4 and change for the 0-60 time

  • Nice shifting.

  • buy new shoes dude

  • Isn't the 6.2 a 16 valve SOHC?

  • @toyotatough1 6.2 is a pushrod OHV motor.

  • I'm pretty sure i got about 4.9 seconds about 5 times?

  • @pigvonrow1215 i think its more than that... about, little under, 6 seconds, starts around 11.5 into the vid and ends right at 16

  • @warrenzonator You gotta use a stop watch not the video time unless your putting it on the program and cutting it to the .00 of a second.

  • @pigvonrow1215 i was just estimating, no big deal

  • why does it shake so much when you shift?

  • @winterloggan his RPM were too high. I think. He should have popped the clutch a little lower. Cars have different Hp and torque through the RPM range. Lower torque at top end (6000rpm) and less hp at low end (1000rpm) He should shave off a few tenth if he catches a perfect launch.

  • That launch control was developed for HSV's but it was crap! They tweaked it for the new model but the update must not of made it to America yet.

  • Weird jerky speedo......

  • more like 0-80....

  • Wow, freaking highest trim for the Camaro and it has plastic-rubber pedals..

  • @MPG cant u go to 7500 rpm since u can go 9000rpm

  • An ss is really like 4.5 seconds 0 to 60 or a lil less

  • why do americans not drive more than 80 mph?? why not just full throttle? :)

  • 4.75 sec

  • 6 seconds! Just as fast as the vw gti

  • @gadgetguy4000 yup. and for a fraction of the price too :)

  • @XxKobeBryantxX24 lol yea but its...AMERICAN D: i dont know why but i love german cars like vw and bmw and porsche lol

  • @gadgetguy4000 this thing will destroy a VW GTI.... a gti will do 0-60 in about 6 seconds. A camaro SS does it in 4.6 seconds....

  • @Jesse22H more importantly it will do the 1/4 mile 12.9 whats the gti like 15 haha, what us gm guys need to be worried about is the coyote from ford, no worrys though the new 5.5 is gonna fuck shit up

  • @LS9lives i think there's so reason to be worried about anything dodge or ford releases, the point of cars like this aren't for who's is exactly the fastest or for competition, its the style and feel of the car you want. They're all awesome, sleek, retro american cars that put out great numbers

  • @Jesse22H 4.5 sec i had testend with a stopwacht next mouth i will tuning it up to 1200hp so it goes form 0-60 in 2 sec faster then a veryon

  • @Xan3200GT 2 seconds faster than a veyron is a 0.5 second 0-60.... only drag racing cars with 8,000hp can do that.

    no camaro will do that haha :P

  • @Jesse22H i counted around 6

  • yes 5 sec

  • You couldn't GIVE me a manual! Even if it was free. I'll take an auto any day of the week!

  • @ZaneWulf Better yet, maybe you should just go drive a Prius.

  • @vrmmmm You couldn't give me one of those either.

    : /

  • 4.8-5.0

  • dum azz said 6 seconds when this was clearly under 5 seconds

  • Money for car but still rockin the busted sneakers

  • @187GB Borrowed car. Borrowed sneakers. I'm workin' on it ...

  • @mpgomatic i had an accident when i reached 180 mph, after i reached 180 mph, i hitted an 18 wheeler truck and my car's bumper fell off but the truck went off road and flipped over 30 times and then exploded, thankfully i survived and my car is ok

  • @xxxn7zxxx did he died

  • @OzBooger i didn't see the driver after the truck exploded so maybe yea, that accident wasn't on news because it's too violent

  • @xxxn7zxxx Lol :)

  • @187GB Those my friends are called asians... money for car but no furniture in house n they only eat rice n maruchan soups with boil eggs.

  • @187GB its called financing!!!!!!!!! broke people drive to buddy !

  • @187GB they arent busted.. they are badass adidas's

  • @187GB you call this alot i was in the usa and it was there about 45 000 dollars in belgium you pay for a car like that 125 000 dollars

  • @bjornke123456789 That's because your currency is worth nothing.

  • @XxFightinDirtyxX i know that but stil it isent that much

  • @bjornke123456789 i wouldn't even pay 45,000 for it!!!

  • @floridabowhunter my dad payed about 130 000 dollars for an audi s5

  • @bjornke123456789 That is alot you can get the new 2012 model in the United States for 53,000 U.S. dollars.

  • @STRIKER520 i know in america the cars are cheap and also the gasoline for the gas here in belgium you pay for 3 gallons 8 dollars

  • @bjornke123456789 That's crazy. My best friend just bought an Audi S5 and it wasn't anywhere NEAR that expensive.

  • @PaladinZ06 i know it xd

  • @bjornke123456789 not even 45k it must be 35k in usa

  • @MegaSuzukiboy yeah but the 45k was full options

  • i got 6.38 seconds thats great

  • For everyone writing that it's 6 seconds to 60- FYI. Launch mode= 4k RPMs, start your "accurate stopwatches" when you hear the car's tires chirp. Starting at the sound of the tires shave