Added: 2 years ago
From: pinegrove33
Views: 3,669
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i totally have to read this, thank you pinegrove33

  • Thanks for the heads up on the book, Bernard.

    I just discovered your channel, and have been catching up on your videos. Soon as I have the available funds (Christmas leaves the bank account pretty dry), I'll be adding this book to the collection on my Kindle.

  • Politics is a form of division.

    When the absurd is normal,and vice versa,then the result is the USA today.

    Read the 'Overton Window',and the word 'absurd' by itself.

    *Also read the communist manifesto,at least the 10 planks.

    *Also read the 'Protocols of the learned elders of zion'.

    These couple of 'reads' are just that,it's for the open minded only,and for you to decide.Once everyone can come to the realization that the USA is a tool of the Zionist plan,only then can we proceed,period.

  • Individuality the world abhors. I would hate to see us trade one extreme for another. Right or Left we seem to land in precisely at the same place. We are balanced on razor's edge. Fall Right, we have corporatocracy. A system which lacks any economic freedom. Where power is centralized and only the strongest rise. Fall Left, the economic inefficiencies and inflation cause credit to dry up. Either extreme sows the seeds of instability in the masses.

    Shame we can't solve...

    To thine own self.

  • Blimey, I watched this at 2 a.m. and when you roared at 0.14 it woke up my entire family!

  • I don't remember which David Burleigh book discusses how a community of dysfunctional misanthropes was crucial in fomenting both Nazism and Communism, but he goes into some detail on this point. I think it's _Sacred Causes_, but it could also be _The Third Reich: A New History_.

  • Jamie Glazov is a genius!

  • United in Hate is the best book I have read this year. I would recomend it to everyone. Jamie Glazov is right on the money here! 10 out of 10 nad that includes the one typo I found in the book.

  • ....there's no use criticising aspects of a *culture*, as you can get the same criticism back. It's a pointless venture undertaken by fools.

  • I think you've helped me find my next book! It sounds great! Great job!

  • Islamiic women do not see themselves as being oppressed. Nor do they see themselves as second-class citizens.

    I know many Muslim women, and they are very powerful within the family.

  • Bernard. As far as explanations of the left go, what do you think of Evan Sayet and his heritage foundation speech(s)?

  • left ,right are old ways of looking at things ,I myself much prefer to be a free thinker .

    Bernard you are better than this simplistic crap ! but I guess your fan boys like it .

  • First "Chorizo" now "Sausage"? This must be missing "links" day! I wonder who's bones will get the grinder this time?

    If "left ,right are old ways of looking at things" and since political views & opinions in this country are far from being unanimously harmonious with each other. Thus, requiring identifiers to distinctively sort them out. Then I guess that "free thinker" is merely the new politically correct, unoffensive name that's replaced that self inflicted dirty word........ "leftist".

  • political correctness is fascism ,an anathema to the free thinker ,

    A free thinker as to avoid bias avoids group think ,so tends to not be affiliated to any group ,hope that helps .

  • The only anathema I know about is from when I told some old guy that he's as brilliantly sharp as a blistered blunt baboon butt. Also, that he should go shoot a game of pool & drink a cold brew with Father 8 Ball & Sister Mary Q. Stick down at the Our Lady of the Pool Hall before St. Simian Selection of the Tree Descention mindlessly & unintelligently morpholobotomizes him with a misery making, adolescent, mutational mutard boy with a buttless birth defect. That old man turned out to be the Pope

  • So I had no choice but to anathematize him from my realm. Worse than Amalekites. Wronger than Moabites. More treacherous than parading men in tights. "Simianites", I anathematize.

    ~ The Pro Testing Ape Hunter ~

  • Young Earth Cretinists and Femi-Nazi have something in common ,their obstinate refusal to except modern biology ,Enjoy your Ignorance Chuichupachichi ; science, hopefully will march on in it's pursuit of knowledge, regardless .

    This Bernard is the kind of Idiot you are attracting ,by making anti 3rd wave feminism a vanguard of the right.

  • Alright smart guy, todays viruses must have descended from viruses that lived at the time when evo postulates that only single cell organisms lived. That means they trace back further & longer than any multiple cell organisms. Viruses mutate more frequently & to greater degrees than most organisms because they're only one cell. Thus, the whole organism morphs. Its human equivalent would perhaps be to the degree of Elephant Man for each mutational occurrence. Evoists postulate millions of yrs in

  • which the entire viral organism would have been mutating very frequently, as today. But yet, they're still viruses! Guess what, if in one of these epochs, viruses finally speciate into a non virus, then maybe the rest of earths organisms might have a shot at their first ever macro evolutionary occurrence

    I don't know what attracted you to Uncle Bern's high league (perhaps the bright light bulbs?) but only a real refutation will shed idiot status. There's nothing modern about Sumerian Evoligion

  • Chuichupachichi on my page I have a link to a site of qualified Biologist's ask them , I can not talk to your sort without losing my temper .

    1) how to win friends and influence people on the internuts

    ans: cut n paste from answers in genesis , the convicted fraudster Kent hovend had all the answers ,*yawn.

  • {I can not talk to your sort without losing my temper}

    That means something. You simply don't know what it means because "to not know things" is the default setting, brainwashed into evolutionists. Otherwise, how would one explain progeny evoist's ancestral, Amoebian progenitors & your subscription to the "4 legged whales" belief?

    Notice that its while debating with "my sort" only, that you lose your temper. Thats because only Creationists can make you display the angry sign of that you lost

  • I'm proud to be an Amalekite.

  • Chuichupachichi there is no such thing as an evolutionist ,Idiot!

    absolutely all the stupid half witted Ignorant hog wash that spews from creation science (Christian religion trying to be science ) has been refuted over and over again , everything ! I have nothing to say to you ,you're a fool.

  • I don't think feminists refuse to acknowledge things that happen in Islam. They're just not bothered. And what's wrong with the burkha? The burkha is about as oppressive as a formal suit.

  • "jupiviv" - glad to see you're not ground meat in a casing.

    {I don't think feminists refuse to acknowledge things that happen in Islam}

    Perhaps you're simply refusing to acknowledge that feminists refuse to acknowledge things that happen to be in dire need of acknowledgment?

    {They're just not bothered}

    Perhaps they need to wear a burkha in a scorching desert? Guaranteed they'd be "hot & bothered". But a lost virginity gets you killed

    continued...

  • ***Perhaps you're simply refusing to acknowledge that feminists refuse to acknowledge things that happen to be in dire need of acknowledgment?***

    I don't think that the burkha is in dire need of acknowledgment. Besides, even if it were in such a need, they would have no authority to do anything about it.

  • Not in need of acknowledgment?

    See, that's a perfect example of someone refusing to acknowledge the things that are in dire need of acknowledgment. You should acknowledge that its done simply for refusing to acknowledge that you're unacknowledgingly incorrect. Acknowledgment is a fantastic thing, don't hate it. Don't fear it. You may suffer from Acknowlophobia?

    Previously you asked - "whats wrong with a burkha"? Nothing! If you like a grievously ghastly, gory, gash grilling, gorilla costume

  • ***Previously you asked - "whats wrong with a burkha"? Nothing! If you like a grievously ghastly, gory, gash grilling, gorilla costume***

    I also don't like suits, because they make people look like clowns. Yet, people are forced to wear them all the time. For that matter, I also don't like sexy dresses, because they make women look like whores.

  • Interesting! You don't seem to like garments. How do you feel about western civilization's cultural social construct that forces people to wear nothing into the shower or bath tub, considering there exist primitive cultures, as in the Amazon jungle, who's bathing attire, or lack of it, is not forced upon them? Preferably, you'd arrive at your answer without taking into account the fact that those cultures usually don't wear anything at any time anyway. Would sexy dresses make their women whores?

  • No, a person is not forced to wear anything into the bathtub. He wears nothing because he has to make his body have contact with the water, which clothes would not allow.

    On the other hand, a woman who wears sexy clothing does so with one intent - whoring herself to men. Even that is forced upon her - by biology and to some extent society.

    So, everything in every culture is forced upon the people for some reason or the other, by someone or the other, and is bad or good to some degree.

  • Bernard!!!! My laptop vibrated!!! Fantastic inferno edition.

  • Very true.

    What a shame these people can insult their own intelligence!

  • Holy Sh## you have an AMAZING operatic voice, there, Mr C!!

    Oh---and great review, too.

  • have you read liberal facism yet?

  • If I may answer on Bernards behalf.

    He reviewed Liberal Fascism a while ago.

    watch?v=_fO7zuwvozg

    I have read it too. Bloody good book.

  • I have to go find the review ! Bernard is great...i look forward to all his new videos !

  • Its a death cult because they support any cause that gets them into power even if that cause is destructive to the people because their power is essential to the preserving their vision of the utopian state which is why we are a just society when they are in power and evil one when they are not in power.

  • Bernard, you should study classical music. I jumped when you did that, but it sounded good in a way!

    I echo what tvman said, the book queue is getting unmanageably long. I better get busy.

  • Bernie: Your choice of T-Shirt is very appropriate for this topic/review due to the gaggle of stupid celebrities who compare Conservatives to Hitler, yet love wearing Che T-Shirts [and the berets], and have lunch dates with the Castro brothers. Great job once again.

  • I find it ironic that the left claims that they are the advocates of civil liberties yet they do more harm to our Constitutional rights than anyone else!

  • Not only do leftists never look back, they also never look forward to the inevitable horrific consequences of their policies on the horizon.

    Obama just signed a treaty [without Senate approval] with Russia [and therefore also China, Korea & Iran] for the US to get rid of one third of OUR nuclear power, thereby weakening our defenses and making these rogue nations THE superpowers. All this during a time when Iran, Pakistan, and Korea are expanding their nuclear programs.

  • That sounds like 1984 in which the ministry of truth always sought to keep the people in the present and never in the past or future that way they can create any truth at any moment that supports their goals.

  • wait, all leftists are anti free market, what im mostly on the left and im not a commie, i think he means extreme leftism

  • They are anti-free anything because freedom means the possibility that they can opt out of the utopian society that they want to impose on others.

  • actually if you look into most extreme leftism, it ends up in the phony communism category, which is a "social utopia"

    You cant have a utopia where people work together with individualism aka capitalism

  • This entire comment is riddled with self defeating incorrectness.

    1) How can anything phony result in "social utopia"?

    2) If "you can't have a utopia where people work together". Then that would imply that utopia is achieved by an uncooperative society. That sounds like individualism gone awry with selfish Democrap selfism

    The best one can say about leftism in the USA is perhaps many of them have good intentions. But their misery making shows why "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"

  • If I would start reading all the stuff I had collected ( Tons ) , I wouldn't be finished even in 2050.

    There is no Age which has ever fed us with more Propaganda than this one.

    Great Video. 5 Stars !

  • The word "necessary" is popping up a bit too much lately. That word gives me the chills.

  • The reasoning behind his use of the term "death cult" is beautifully articulated and I think it's highly overlooked and underplayed in the exchanges we have with the left. To even utter the possibility that they would consider those evils necessary have (in my experience) at times resulted in an almost violent tantrum. The eugenic element in the "Early Progressive" movement has the idea that it's necessary to cull the population to maintain a good human to earth ratio.

  • Dammit Bernard, my list of books to read is getting too long because of you.

  • He picks good interesting books to read....

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more