the reviewer sucks! the motor puts out 355 hp not 375! the sho is the only car from ford that puts out more than 355 and it's rated at 365hp. also the interior and dash panel in the mkt is 100%different from the flex also all the sheet metal is diff. also has a taller final drive ratio! DIFFERENT VEHICHLE!!!! how can a car testing proffetional be so misinformed?
I agree, this reviewer is high. I would pay $7000 just for the style improvements over the boxy flex. Higher end cars should not have to conform to meet functional standards. When is the last time someone talked about leg room when reviewing a Mercedes or Cayenne?
I just purchased my New MKT from my Portland dealer, it's the Red color and I must say...WOW ! What a stunner ! I'm blessed to beable to even own one yes but, It's just such a mesmerizing vehicle, why I just got 5 comments from strangers while I pulled into the OSJL store in Sanford. I tell you, people WILL talk and stare, and I LOVE IT !
BTW, I'm 6'2" and I was able to sqeeze into the last rear seat. I would never actually ride back there, but it could be done. Best for small people and kids. So I wouldn't say it's unusable.
I sat in the MKT and the Q7 this wknd. I'm an Audi guy (have bought 2) and I have to say that the MKT was nicer. The styling is very bold and love it or hate it, but its very refined, inside and out. The interior was better in the MKT. That's quite a statement for me to admit.
First of all this vehicle is AMAZING! SIMPLY PUT and And Of Course Its $11,000 More Its A Lincoln Offering Push Button Start, Panoramic Vista Roof ( Not Some Flex Panel BS) Adaptive Cruise Control, Adaptive HID Headlights, Heated & Cooled 1st & 2nd Row Seats, So What the NAVI is OPTIONAL IT HAS A STANDARD TOUCH SCREEN RADIO & OPTIONAL THX Sound System Pushing 600 Watts (Have you heard the Flex's SONY ITS CRAP) Did I Forget You Can Open The Windows And Moonroof With The Keypad (MONEY WELL SPENT)
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah. That's pretty good but, would've been better if, Ford would've added that 5.0 engine. ;-) I just checked out the new V6 and, V8 versions of the 'Stang, on the dyno. Those 'Stangs are putting out more hp. than FomoCo. predicted! The V6 really pumps out close to 320hp....and, the 5.0 pumps out 436hp.! Also, it's the fastest out of the 3 muscle cars, now. That's a GREAT look for Ford! ;-)
@BklynJayL yes indeed it is. and the reason they wouldn't put the 5.0 in the taurus is because it would've been completely shitty gas mileage in such a large car with awd. The mustang is much smaller and lighter as visually obvious and it just is getting about the same gas mileage as the sho engine in the mustang. imagine how bad it would be in a taurus. omg. lol. but i see what you're saying though.
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah, that's true. I saw a new Ford Taurus, earlier 2night and, that car is HUGE! It look like. it's bigger than a BMW 7-Series! Lol.. The 5.0 would've definitely got terrible gas mileage in the Taurus...but, it also would've lowered it 0-60 time down to around 5 secs. flat or, just below it. ;-)
@ssj4goldengogeta Ford should also make a SVT or, SHO version of the Fusion/MKZ with, the TT. V6 or, a 300+hp'd. 4.6 V8(former 'Stang motor). That would be "BadAzz"!!! Better yet..., if Lincoln really want to compete with Cadillac's CTS-V, BMW M5/M5 and, Benz. AMG..., they could put that 5.0 engine in the MKZ. There goes your "HotRod" Lincoln(0-60 below 4.5 secs., easily)! ;-)
@BklynJayL they're aiming to redefine american luxury and modernize their cars with more engaging performance and technology. They're not aiming to burn rubber like a bmw or to carve canyons. That's why the ecoboosted lincoln mks rides much softer and luxurious than a taurus sho. two different set points.
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah. Make sense...but, in order for American luxury vehicles to really compete with the comp.(in which, combines luxury, speed and, performance), they'll have to do the same.
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah. That's true. Hopefully..., that unique person or, people reconize it so, Ford sells can rise like it should(although, it already have been).
this shit cost the same as an Audi Q7... tell me why should i buy this overpriced-underfunctioned flex.... and it doesnt even have a seatable 3rd row..
People spend an extra $10,000 all the time for badge and snob appeal upgrades.... where has this reviewer been? This was a really bad review. The title read "MKT Road Test," and they hardly even talked about how this car actually rides and handles. No talk about road noise, interior quietness, etc. Also it was poor that they failed to mention that the Flex and the MKT do not share a single piece of sheet metal, nor do they share any interior materials.
yup this reviewer is so arrogant, when everybody else says it's much better for value than the audi Q7 he keeps saying it's a rebranded flex...what an ass
it looks like a beautiful car, but that rear end is just fucking ugly. but thats also alot to pay for a lincoln, seeing as though it looks like a hurse
Mkay...Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, Yukon XL, Expedition all get EPA 21 mpg highway.
For instance, the Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrids 6.0-liter V8 engine produces 332 horsepower (HP) and 367 foot pounds of torque.
The official mileage estimates for the 2009 Tahoe Hybrid are 21 city / 22 highway mpg for the 2WD version and 20/20 for the 4WD. It weights 5,835 pounds with 4wd and 5,617 pounds with 2WD.
It can tow 6,200 pounds and has off-road capability, too. After all, that's what SUVs are for.
Oh, I definitely know that. And I love the idea of strapping on turbos to smaller engines! It gives people a much better opportunity to upgrade the engine.
Ford is going in the right direction but WHO THE FUCK IS IN CONTROL OF LINCOLN in general Lincoln is getting worse not better. You would think with the success of the CTS and Escalade they would move in that direction Caddy started to going to sport lux rwd based cars and they saw a considerable boom in sales.
I guess he doesn't realize Mkt is in a class dominated by Audi BMW and Mercedes, it hold two more 'half-pints' in it's third row compared to the 2010 SRX. The Flex is gonna be on every block, the MKT hopefully every neighborhood.. think exclusive think Audi, Mecedes, BMW Caddy.
I couldn't agree with you more! I don't know if you watch or subscribe to the Motor Trend videos, but Edmunds is starting to make stupid comments just like them. To add to your list, the Benz R class and, GLK,
How can they call it an Eco car when it has a Twin Turbo?
Also the auto park system is for failed drivers. Why would you need that? Parking it yourself is faster and more safe. I bet there are at least a few flaws to that system. The narrator said protect bumpers. I doubt that protect the rims. Also that auto park system don't work if its not enough room. There needs to be a X number of feet in the spot in order for it to park. Meaning it can't park all spots that fit your car.
I'm so confused with car editors. They bitch about SUVs when they don't have 3rd row seating, and when they do have a 3rd row seat, they bitch about it having one. WTF? The 3rd row on this MKT is small enough just for children, but it STILL has it! + if you don't need the 3rd row, fold the damn thing down. So whats with all the bitching about it Edmunds? I suppose it's just a conundrum...
Having a third row folded down takes up a lot of valuable real estate, so if it is useless, it still is a detractor. And, they don't bitch about not having a 3rd row unless the car is massive, i.e. some Tahoes/ Escalades w/o the 3rd row,. . This car is big enough to expect a decent 3rd row, so bitching about it having a bad one is expected, especially when its little brother has a better one.
YES they would bitch about it, because it is large enough that A BIG 3RD ROW IS EXPECTED! I think in video this car looks significantly smaller than it actually is. IN A CAR THIS BIG, YOU NEED A DECENT THIRD ROW [period]. No car this large would lack a 3rd row entirely.
Hey used the both about the same price and I'd go mkt, and not wild about the dash or seats in the flex. I but visibility in the mkt is subpar.
Taureg96 1 month ago
I like both just as well.
GmTruckCarLove 6 months ago
That's one of the best looking fronts out there. I love the back too.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
um 375 hp? since when? try 355
Butchcub75 1 year ago
Flex Flex this Flex Flex that. Whats wrong with this reviewer? Just goes to show that the lowest standard is the American standard.
7477238 1 year ago
the reviewer sucks! the motor puts out 355 hp not 375! the sho is the only car from ford that puts out more than 355 and it's rated at 365hp. also the interior and dash panel in the mkt is 100%different from the flex also all the sheet metal is diff. also has a taller final drive ratio! DIFFERENT VEHICHLE!!!! how can a car testing proffetional be so misinformed?
gert94ls 1 year ago
@gert94ls
Uhh no,. Have you ever heard of a Mustang GT? And the Super Snake is sold by Ford from Shelby. That's 800 Horses right there.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
I agree, this reviewer is high. I would pay $7000 just for the style improvements over the boxy flex. Higher end cars should not have to conform to meet functional standards. When is the last time someone talked about leg room when reviewing a Mercedes or Cayenne?
gehli003 1 year ago
Wack...
iambrianjp 1 year ago
I just purchased my New MKT from my Portland dealer, it's the Red color and I must say...WOW ! What a stunner ! I'm blessed to beable to even own one yes but, It's just such a mesmerizing vehicle, why I just got 5 comments from strangers while I pulled into the OSJL store in Sanford. I tell you, people WILL talk and stare, and I LOVE IT !
MrWanderful1979 1 year ago 3
@MrWanderful1979 sanford fl? and congrats
vanquishman 1 year ago
what is the music @ 0:01?
09Krisman22 1 year ago
BTW, I'm 6'2" and I was able to sqeeze into the last rear seat. I would never actually ride back there, but it could be done. Best for small people and kids. So I wouldn't say it's unusable.
shwndh 1 year ago
I sat in the MKT and the Q7 this wknd. I'm an Audi guy (have bought 2) and I have to say that the MKT was nicer. The styling is very bold and love it or hate it, but its very refined, inside and out. The interior was better in the MKT. That's quite a statement for me to admit.
shwndh 1 year ago
flex is ugly that is sexy, lincoln always has unique rear ends meaning taillights ect
uhustic4545 1 year ago
First of all this vehicle is AMAZING! SIMPLY PUT and And Of Course Its $11,000 More Its A Lincoln Offering Push Button Start, Panoramic Vista Roof ( Not Some Flex Panel BS) Adaptive Cruise Control, Adaptive HID Headlights, Heated & Cooled 1st & 2nd Row Seats, So What the NAVI is OPTIONAL IT HAS A STANDARD TOUCH SCREEN RADIO & OPTIONAL THX Sound System Pushing 600 Watts (Have you heard the Flex's SONY ITS CRAP) Did I Forget You Can Open The Windows And Moonroof With The Keypad (MONEY WELL SPENT)
MrRyan0258 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrRyan0258 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrRyan0258 1 year ago
Wow! 375hp.? I thought, it was 355hp..
BklynJayL 1 year ago
it is 355 they made a mistake.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta It might be true...because, even on Lincoln's website..., it says, the MKT have 375hp.. ;-)
BklynJayL 1 year ago
@BklynJayL i just looked at the lincoln website under the specs and it says 355hp.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta You're right. I just saw it too. It's the Ford TaurusSHO that have more hp.. My mistake! ;-)
BklynJayL 1 year ago
@BklynJayL yeah the taurus has 365hp with 350 pound feet of torque.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah. That's pretty good but, would've been better if, Ford would've added that 5.0 engine. ;-) I just checked out the new V6 and, V8 versions of the 'Stang, on the dyno. Those 'Stangs are putting out more hp. than FomoCo. predicted! The V6 really pumps out close to 320hp....and, the 5.0 pumps out 436hp.! Also, it's the fastest out of the 3 muscle cars, now. That's a GREAT look for Ford! ;-)
BklynJayL 1 year ago
@BklynJayL yes indeed it is. and the reason they wouldn't put the 5.0 in the taurus is because it would've been completely shitty gas mileage in such a large car with awd. The mustang is much smaller and lighter as visually obvious and it just is getting about the same gas mileage as the sho engine in the mustang. imagine how bad it would be in a taurus. omg. lol. but i see what you're saying though.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah, that's true. I saw a new Ford Taurus, earlier 2night and, that car is HUGE! It look like. it's bigger than a BMW 7-Series! Lol.. The 5.0 would've definitely got terrible gas mileage in the Taurus...but, it also would've lowered it 0-60 time down to around 5 secs. flat or, just below it. ;-)
BklynJayL 1 year ago
@BklynJayL yeah but they would most likely put an engine like that in the SHO and it already gets 0-60 in 5 seconds or less.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta Ford should also make a SVT or, SHO version of the Fusion/MKZ with, the TT. V6 or, a 300+hp'd. 4.6 V8(former 'Stang motor). That would be "BadAzz"!!! Better yet..., if Lincoln really want to compete with Cadillac's CTS-V, BMW M5/M5 and, Benz. AMG..., they could put that 5.0 engine in the MKZ. There goes your "HotRod" Lincoln(0-60 below 4.5 secs., easily)! ;-)
BklynJayL 1 year ago
@BklynJayL that would all be cool. lol. but that would go against what lincoln is aiming for.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta Oh really? What's Lincoln aiming for?
BklynJayL 1 year ago
@BklynJayL they're aiming to redefine american luxury and modernize their cars with more engaging performance and technology. They're not aiming to burn rubber like a bmw or to carve canyons. That's why the ecoboosted lincoln mks rides much softer and luxurious than a taurus sho. two different set points.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah. Make sense...but, in order for American luxury vehicles to really compete with the comp.(in which, combines luxury, speed and, performance), they'll have to do the same.
BklynJayL 1 year ago
@BklynJayL well they're not trying to sell to everybody, just certain people. They're building a unique brand for unique people.
ssj4goldengogeta 1 year ago
@ssj4goldengogeta Yeah. That's true. Hopefully..., that unique person or, people reconize it so, Ford sells can rise like it should(although, it already have been).
BklynJayL 1 year ago
i agree
this shit cost the same as an Audi Q7... tell me why should i buy this overpriced-underfunctioned flex.... and it doesnt even have a seatable 3rd row..
good luck a sales...
warset 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What an ugly POS. People have no taste.
Nettikturbo 2 years ago
People spend an extra $10,000 all the time for badge and snob appeal upgrades.... where has this reviewer been? This was a really bad review. The title read "MKT Road Test," and they hardly even talked about how this car actually rides and handles. No talk about road noise, interior quietness, etc. Also it was poor that they failed to mention that the Flex and the MKT do not share a single piece of sheet metal, nor do they share any interior materials.
colderbeer 2 years ago 13
yup this reviewer is so arrogant, when everybody else says it's much better for value than the audi Q7 he keeps saying it's a rebranded flex...what an ass
aeroavia89 1 year ago
@colderbeer
Nor do they even look the same lol.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
Why the ugly grille and the name that could be an abbreviation for "Market"?
fixinggrace 2 years ago
Lookin cool.
steve9509 2 years ago
the car does remind me of a grand piano and a blue whale, but I guess I am not customer lincoln have set it their sights for this car
dnur567 2 years ago
Weird,big and ulgy
theodoro216 2 years ago
Lincoln needs to name their cars with names not with MK everytime.
SBD05 2 years ago
That's a Lincoln trademark to do so. Stands for "Mark", just like Benz and, BMW uses numbers. ;-)
BklynJayL 2 years ago
i like it...
adansito777 2 years ago
front grill is fugly and ruins it
M1GreenEagle 2 years ago
Wow! 375hp. and, 0-60 time of 6.3?! Not bad..., not bad at all...not to mention, very stylish! ;-)
BklynJayL 2 years ago 11
i like it i think it looks good and its pretty nice in side not the best but good i really like the front end nice car with a great drive train
johnnysk8s88 2 years ago
dont know why lincoln scrapped the LS which and started selling rebarged fords... exactly opposite of what caddy is doing and they're going up
vk45de 2 years ago
I love it, except for the rear end, but wouldn't buy one. And it has a ton of power from only a V-6
geedunk13 2 years ago
isn't it 355 hp? and the sho slightly higher at 365??
duplessis2006 2 years ago
355hp. was the speculation...but, they've bumped it up 20 more hp..
BklynJayL 2 years ago
it looks like a beautiful car, but that rear end is just fucking ugly. but thats also alot to pay for a lincoln, seeing as though it looks like a hurse
snare94 2 years ago
I'd bet, you'll buy it if, it was a Benz!
BklynJayL 2 years ago
yeah it looks like the type of car to compete against the R-Class Merc
dnur567 2 years ago
Oh yeah. Most definitely! Which one will you choose? ;-)
BklynJayL 2 years ago
Def the MKT. The Mercedes is just a minivan. Not cool at all.
shwndh 1 year ago
@shwndh Yeah, that's true. Plus, the MKT have more hp. and, style to it. ;-)
BklynJayL 1 year ago
It looks different, but I think it's pretty classy.
stigger91 2 years ago 3
tooo bad
malung83 2 years ago
rubbish
heydaroff 2 years ago
introducing 2010 hearse
redfranchise 2 years ago
Lol..
BklynJayL 2 years ago
looks like a coffin car.
maverickm4 2 years ago
ugly
metainfinity 2 years ago
My point is the fuel economy sucks.
moaski 2 years ago
i like the look on this better than the ford flex.
YAGO323 2 years ago
i think the grill is too high
nwonknu8 2 years ago
it's like Chrysler in the mid-late 90s.... ENORMOUS GRILLE !
hadabenz 2 years ago
Is that ugly-ass grill for real?
sspope 2 years ago
16 mpg city and 22 highway...THAT SUCKS!
moaski 2 years ago
Not when it's a 5800lb 3 row luxury car with 355hp. Find another vehicle with the same space/seating and power that even gets over 20mpg hwy.
typhoon5000 2 years ago
Mkay...Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, Yukon XL, Expedition all get EPA 21 mpg highway.
For instance, the Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrids 6.0-liter V8 engine produces 332 horsepower (HP) and 367 foot pounds of torque.
The official mileage estimates for the 2009 Tahoe Hybrid are 21 city / 22 highway mpg for the 2WD version and 20/20 for the 4WD. It weights 5,835 pounds with 4wd and 5,617 pounds with 2WD.
It can tow 6,200 pounds and has off-road capability, too. After all, that's what SUVs are for.
moaski 2 years ago
They may have a point. If it's in a business class, why are the 3rd row seats made for kids or are all business men midgets?
sspope 2 years ago
0-60 in 6.3 seconds?!?!
Wow, that is very impressive for a large, heavy CUV! That EcoBoost engine, wow...
AWDfreak 2 years ago 3
That's just a very green name for turbo.
sspope 2 years ago
Oh, I definitely know that. And I love the idea of strapping on turbos to smaller engines! It gives people a much better opportunity to upgrade the engine.
AWDfreak 2 years ago
God what an ugly car. The front is blah.
EnigmaNZ1 2 years ago
Not exactly ugly but the design need to calm down a bit.
osamaFXX 2 years ago
Why did they make this piece of shit???
Ford is going in the right direction but WHO THE FUCK IS IN CONTROL OF LINCOLN in general Lincoln is getting worse not better. You would think with the success of the CTS and Escalade they would move in that direction Caddy started to going to sport lux rwd based cars and they saw a considerable boom in sales.
sidewayznut2009 2 years ago
I will never buy a ford product after seeing the movie "Flash of genius" Ford is an unethical auto company...
OneOfaKind949 2 years ago
it looks kinda ugly
zipcis 2 years ago
This makes the 1995 Ford Scorpio look attractive...
joh2 2 years ago
Wow I thought the Accord crossover was ugly, actually i still think its ugly but this thing is right up there.
superartus 2 years ago
ugly car....
educortazarc 2 years ago
I guess he doesn't realize Mkt is in a class dominated by Audi BMW and Mercedes, it hold two more 'half-pints' in it's third row compared to the 2010 SRX. The Flex is gonna be on every block, the MKT hopefully every neighborhood.. think exclusive think Audi, Mecedes, BMW Caddy.
frpda205 2 years ago
Dont forget Infiniti....
Apoth3cary 2 years ago
I couldn't agree with you more! I don't know if you watch or subscribe to the Motor Trend videos, but Edmunds is starting to make stupid comments just like them. To add to your list, the Benz R class and, GLK,
sdlausen 2 years ago
that is the fastest suv in the world !
reviewsitedollars 2 years ago
yeah right........ i remind you of the x5m, v12 q7, cayenne turbo........
educortazarc 2 years ago
Well thats either sarcasm or you are forgeting about the Cayenne turbo....
brudus10 2 years ago
The Lincoln has two turbos it will blow away any cayenne any day any time the eco boost is the best engine in the history of the automobile
reviewsitedollars 2 years ago
hahah dumba ass the only cayenne this piece of crap will beat is the base or s the trubo s does 60 in 4.1 it will blow most sports cars on their ass
wnnarace 2 years ago
This FUCKER PARKS ITSELF????
bigwillchill 2 years ago
Wow my grandma's BMW does the same thing...plus its not as ugly.
brudus10 2 years ago
I just saw one today and did a double take. Very beautiful on the road.
blockthis08 2 years ago
Looks like a hearse, but a pretty stylish package overall. Hell of a lot better than the MDX and RX350.
m140m 2 years ago
It looks like Lincoln either spent not enough, or too much time designing the MKT
Z3RO0RD1E 2 years ago
It's fucking beautiful IMO.
And with this size...0-60 in 6.3? Good grief...fuel economy isn't that terrible either. This thing rocks!
wildbloodydragon 2 years ago 3
man, the grille is going to get bigger, and bigger, and until it occupies the whole front
billyandika3158 2 years ago
R class all the way for me :)
edzzzzzzzzzz 2 years ago
of course who do you think makes lincoln, not nissan its FORD you guys
colombia3229 2 years ago
rear lights are ugly, the whole shape is very awkward
gang0814 2 years ago
Thanks for the comments. We like to hear what you think of the vehicles and the videos too.
InsideLineVideo 2 years ago
I would get none
I h8 the shitty box shaped flex
vintimv001 2 years ago
How can they call it an Eco car when it has a Twin Turbo?
Also the auto park system is for failed drivers. Why would you need that? Parking it yourself is faster and more safe. I bet there are at least a few flaws to that system. The narrator said protect bumpers. I doubt that protect the rims. Also that auto park system don't work if its not enough room. There needs to be a X number of feet in the spot in order for it to park. Meaning it can't park all spots that fit your car.
NigguhJason 2 years ago
It is really a really ugly Cross Over...
quatlen 2 years ago
very ugly
l2iya 2 years ago
the front makes it look expensive and nice, but wtf happened to the back. at least put some led tail lights..
DavidWood17 2 years ago
all lincolns have cool fronts and shitty backs it seems like
GoDalejr88 2 years ago
its ok
davidlee1222 2 years ago
I'm so confused with car editors. They bitch about SUVs when they don't have 3rd row seating, and when they do have a 3rd row seat, they bitch about it having one. WTF? The 3rd row on this MKT is small enough just for children, but it STILL has it! + if you don't need the 3rd row, fold the damn thing down. So whats with all the bitching about it Edmunds? I suppose it's just a conundrum...
sdlausen 2 years ago
Well. . . eh.
Having a third row folded down takes up a lot of valuable real estate, so if it is useless, it still is a detractor. And, they don't bitch about not having a 3rd row unless the car is massive, i.e. some Tahoes/ Escalades w/o the 3rd row,. . This car is big enough to expect a decent 3rd row, so bitching about it having a bad one is expected, especially when its little brother has a better one.
bg1379 2 years ago
Oh trust me, if this car DIDN'T have a 3rd row seat, they would bitch about it. It's a lose lose situation.
sdlausen 2 years ago
YES they would bitch about it, because it is large enough that A BIG 3RD ROW IS EXPECTED! I think in video this car looks significantly smaller than it actually is. IN A CAR THIS BIG, YOU NEED A DECENT THIRD ROW [period]. No car this large would lack a 3rd row entirely.
bg1379 2 years ago
only thing i like about this car is the interior, everything else is shit
jattpunjabi93 2 years ago
It is a try to copy AUDI Q7
So.. Lolz @ that
legendray2008 2 years ago
oh my god thats an ugly car!
SMG707 2 years ago
Davidtexugo, did you look at your mom agian?
steve9509 2 years ago
the back is sooo frinkin ugly
thebossisheretostay 2 years ago
I think this is the best looking Lincoln to date, kind of reminds me of a Maybach...
Kirbynessness 2 years ago 2
Love it!!!!!!!!!
gunzkevin 2 years ago 2
oh my god it's so ugly
ThomasinHD 2 years ago
reminds me of a toyota venza and a mazda cx-7
zootoo63 2 years ago
who design this vehicle? That SUCKS!!!!!!!
amurogundam 2 years ago
Why so much grill .. i gonna put it vertical to make some barbecue
Reptar2 2 years ago 3
He makes one good point though, you're mostly paying for the brand name. $7k- 11k more than a top of the line Flex.
adogg619 2 years ago
fuck insideline it looks nice and its hot
nokia3591 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i'm not the first comment. thumbs up for me?
coolerdude44 2 years ago
I think it's a nice looking vehicle, but damn Edmunds put up a more high quality video next time.
adogg619 2 years ago 6
@adogg619 since the video was just posted it takes a while for it to reach high quality
hextor300g 2 years ago
it looks like dam whale teeth upfront. . .
zezasu 2 years ago
I'll take a flex over the lincoln any day
blueshadow84 2 years ago 4
same here
TheEnVious17 2 years ago
@blueshadow84
Flex All the way
Reptar2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck its ugly
campanozzi55 2 years ago