well jokes are supposed to be funny are they not. sorry that my 'mindset' of holding women accountable for there action and decisions the way men are held accountable for there actions and decisions makes me a 'potential rapist'. but you are at least right about me disregarding it
i believe the maryland case was where a 16yo boy was having CONSENSUAL sex with an 18yo gir and she said stop somewhere in the middle of it anyway according to her she said he withdrew after "five seconds or so" he said he did immediately (he said she said court of course believed her) so basically if you dont withdraw immediately then its rape even if its 5 second pause still rape and the first court did convict him of rape and again you mentioned no way of proving your innocence either its BS
Sorry about the multiple comments at the top. I was replying to 4 different user's comments. I even clicked the reply link for each of them but YouTube piled all of them at the top anyway. WTF?
Thanks alot man, I appreciate that. Have you seen any of my videos yet? They explain many of the reasons why I have come to this conclusion.
Another tip also for men who are sick of America... If you have a pending child support/divorce case and you know you are being overcharged OR the child is not yours and you still have to pay OR your wife is threatening to take all your money OR other pending cases
5: Empty out your U.S. bank accounts and move to a "non-extradition treaty" country.FAST!
I have come to a conclusion. As long as these types of men are running the system, America's men don't stand a chance. So what to do??? LEAVE THIS COUNTRY AND DON"T LOOK BACK.
Look for a place where:
1: Child support laws do not exist (because they are never meant for the child).
2: Women are not held above men in media, law or society
3: It is located outside of the western countries.
4: Abortion is not allowed (this is the core of feminism and anti-male laws in history)
---She said STOP! We don't know why, but she said it. Perhaps her vaginia was sore or she felt ill. The correct & respectful thing for those men to do was to stop. (males can always jack off, later). So what's wrong with having the law compell these men to stop, as she said, as they should?
---At least the law sees her as a person, with feelings. One can only imagine how these males viewed her, once they got her to agree to something.
they viewed her for what she was A WHORE, what else is she if she let 2 guys fuck her almost simultaneously. and its funny how you dont mention that the guys where under age and she wasnt making her not only a whore but a pedophile, but i guess since it wasnt a man that did that its ok, shes human with feelings
her pussy cant be all that sore as stretched out like a rubber band as it must of been that she couldnt take 2 unripe under age bananas
---Your saying they didn't stop because they were too young and immature? When did their age come into this? And why? If a person says stop you stop; That's basic respect. It doesn't matter why or when.
---As for the law, it should, and thankfully does, support basic respect. That respect should be shown & enforced. The legal definition given to a jury may seem harsh. But more rape convictions would tame those males that treat people like things there just to provide sex.
hell if i no y they didnt stop, point is had she not fucked 2 under age guys that wouldnt have happened to her. so the law supports basic respect eh, i guess since neither u or the law seem to have a problem with this girl statutory rapin these guys i guess its ok if a 25 or 30 yr old guy has sex with a 14 and 15 yr old girl, unless your a hypocrite (we all know the law already is), if u let 2 guys fuck you back 2 back then u R just a thing to provide sex as no 1 worth anything would do that
---I see any comments you make based upon specific facts that are not in the video I commented upon as bogus. My comments are about the LAW & RESPECT. Please, answer them directly. I have no interest in watching your videos if you can't or won't stay focused.
---Also you should assume less! I happen to be male.
u r a mindless idiot, just cause its not in my video u cant use your brain to figure out the logic - no matter what happened 2 her, had she not broken the law by stat. rapin those guys nothing would have happened- i am focused and if u dont want 2 watch my videos i couldnt give less of a fuck than i do now in fact lemme help u (BAM) your blocked now u imbecile
also since my assumptions where right telling me to assume less is very stupid, since i am right if anything i should assume more
the difference between rape and sex is consent. sex is an ongoing process; this is primarily why we enjoy it so much. there is no socially inconvenient time for a woman or man to change their mind for whatever annoying or legitimate reason. why does it make a difference between having sex and preparing for sex? sure the former is more annoying but that doesn't make it void
do you really believe that you wrote. its obvious your not a straight male. try saying that in court
"i wanted to have sex with him but in the middle of it i really decided that were just not for each other so i want to stop" or something to that effect and see if any intelligent judge wouldnt laugh at you.
let me try to sum up my 3 part rape law vid 4 u. if you have ANY doubts about the person thats about to fuck you, during sex is NOT the time to let them know, way b4 sex is, get it now.
people's public personality and sexual personality can be entirely different things. a female could meet a male who before any sexual contact appears to be considerate and gentle but during intercourse could become violent and abusive. there would have been no possible way to identify that in someone before sleeping with them therefore consent is totally justifiable...
yes there is a possible way its called etting to know someone. nothing is guranteed but thats why people get to know the person first if the person is an angel its a less likely chance that the person is going to be a demon during sex (in a bad way not the good way) and vice versa. so what you just said didnt add up at all
the fact that you used the word "likely" there destroys your entire argument because you're admitting there is a chance that a violent sexual experience could take place even if the person "seems" to be genuine. it obviously did add up as the issue still stands.
god your stupid all of what you say has NOTHING to do with THIS CASE. and no it dosnt still stand especially since what brought this law about didnt even happen the way your describing. there was no force or violence or anything.
thats all well and fine, if this law came from a case that was actually rape then i could understand it more, yet it came from some whore that felt ashamed she let two guys run a train thorugh her and now all suffer
...you are saying that is a male deliberately seduced a female and them gave the physical and emotional experience of rape they would be unable to try the perpetrator in court. is that not justice?
what the hell r u talkin about no its not justice in this case there was no voilence she just wanted to stop in the middle of it. its like flying in a plane once you take off you cant say to the flight attendant oh i dont want to fly anymore let me off. you cant turn sex into rape. if you want it at the start you cant just unwant it while its happening. before it happens yes but not while its going on
"in this case" yes in that case but what about all of the other cases that leave women in ruin? sex can and does turn into rape. i know someone who was raped anally by her husband during sex that was extremely painful and humilating for her. but by your reasoning, because she said yes to a sexual experience, even if it was a horrific one the female involved would be totally unjustified to take this man to court.
what you are saying implies that you are an incredibly ignorant and selfish person.
yes but what about the guys that get srewed over by women using sex laws to do what ever they want rather than as protection. your the ignorant one. just cause she took it up the ass and didnt like it dosnt mean its rape, you bitches seem to like to throw the word rape and sexual harrassment around too much. if she did something like hit him in the balls during sex he couldnt take her to court for sexual assault or anything to that effect so be fair and call it down the middle u feminist bitch
well it has become remarkably obvious what the problem is here. we're misunderstanding each other. it's so simple. you think i'm a man hating feminist who defends women who distort the law for their personal agenda.
and i thought you were intelligent enough to understand the point i'm trying to make. but it turns out you are not. i am done with this argument as it is truly a lost cause, you will NEVER be able to grasp the concept i'm describing and so my advice to you is...
...get yourself sterilised you fucking moron, because the thought of you pumping out a demon seed, (possibly after the female involved has howled, fought and begged you to stop fucking her because you're hurting her, but hey, she said yes once and that's good enough for you right?) and creating life to pass on your defective genetic material and your ammoral, backwards, opinions saddens me. you are a prime example of why this fucking failing species is such a blight on the surface of the planet.
u rite all this shit that sounds like it came from a 5 grade retard and want 2 come 2 me about intelligence. u r a fool. (i bet your gonna make up some profiles pretending 2 b friends u dont have and then comment making it seem like you got ppl behind u) im not going 2 fight with u cause a person reading might not b able 2 tell who the imbecile is just remember if u can even get a guy thats drunk and high 2 fuck u its not rape when u want it, get it, then regret it after its done
not so much; but CHILD MOLESTER, yes. i wonder if she was about to get caught, so she filed YET ANOTHER FALSE ALLEGATION of "RAPE" -claiming AS USUAL that she was the victim (when she could've very possibly BEEN THE INSTIGATOR) in an effort to EVADE/PERVERT the course of "justice"... scarring the lives of those kids FOREVER. RAPE!!! RAPE!!!
From what the articles said, she invited them into her car to have sex with her. She wanted to older kid but was scared of the 15 year old because he was big.
You would think that Sistah Da Molester would be in prison right now, but the system turned to whole case around.
I suspect that there is going to be a WHOLE LOT OF INSANITY due to this case as more and more guys get caught up in BS over BS.
Because if you have tits and a vagina, the statutory rape laws don't apply to you. Hence you could be 45 and fuck a 13 year old boy and you will do NO jail time. This happens all the time. Great justice system, huh?
Holy shit...You know now if a girl gets mad in MD all she has to do is fuck her BF and then afterwords go down to the police station and empty her twat for some dna testing and bam! ultimate punishment for here BF not letting her have that 7 dollar teddy bear at walmart (or whatever the issue is). I hope this shit doesnt end up all over the USA.
HA HA damn straight, these bitches in MD are spoiled rich bitches (daddy's money), yet i herd that CA,NY and miami FL bitches some how managed to be as bad if not worse, scary
Hold on now...remember you don't even need DNA to prove rape and even better, courts won't allow DNA evidence or lack thereof to clear your name either because you don't have tits. Priceless, isn't it?
Very sadly, I expect that a percentage of females will use this as a tool against men.
Thats what this decision (?) is designed to do. Divide! I don't expect that most guys will accept this sitting down!
Worse - since you can get more time for rape in MD than murder, I suspect that some males will simply kill the female if they know that they are setting him up.
This rule/law is insane and dangerous for everyone.
damn straight they gonna get killed if they try this shit with the wrong person, but something tells me that most guys dont know about this law. hell i didnt until i made this video and this law was in effect for over a year from what im getting.
its all fucked up. the one thing that was supposed to be so grat got fucked up by, desease, unwanted preg. and now this. whats the point of even doing it anymore
well that's NO OUT, is it? then the "autorities" could screw you with RAPE + MURDER... so; one can realize the issue (about "RAPE") is much more complex than that - IT'S ALL ABOUT PHEMINIST POWER & CONTROL (& NEGLECTING the BS it's based upon) the ONLY way to turn the current state of affairs (for the BETTER) regarding this "issue" is FOR MEN TO COMPLETELY REJECT SEXUAL BLACKMAIL. a ZERO-TOLERANCE policy. it's pussy-whipped wusses' that ENABLE this kind of POWER to CONTROL them & THE REST OF US
The biggest problem is that it is MEN who are creating laws like this AND it is the other men who WILL take this sitting down and just crack open another beer. I say this: screw guys who don't care about being screwed.
This has been flagged as spam show
You're delusional and the mindset you have makes you a potential rapist. But you'll most likely just laugh at my comment and disregard it. It's sad.
effervescingelephant 2 years ago
well jokes are supposed to be funny are they not. sorry that my 'mindset' of holding women accountable for there action and decisions the way men are held accountable for there actions and decisions makes me a 'potential rapist'. but you are at least right about me disregarding it
TENNSUMITSUMA 2 years ago 9
i believe the maryland case was where a 16yo boy was having CONSENSUAL sex with an 18yo gir and she said stop somewhere in the middle of it anyway according to her she said he withdrew after "five seconds or so" he said he did immediately (he said she said court of course believed her) so basically if you dont withdraw immediately then its rape even if its 5 second pause still rape and the first court did convict him of rape and again you mentioned no way of proving your innocence either its BS
trueswordsexpert0909 2 years ago 4
Sorry about the multiple comments at the top. I was replying to 4 different user's comments. I even clicked the reply link for each of them but YouTube piled all of them at the top anyway. WTF?
rexx123456 3 years ago 4
Thanks alot man, I appreciate that. Have you seen any of my videos yet? They explain many of the reasons why I have come to this conclusion.
Another tip also for men who are sick of America... If you have a pending child support/divorce case and you know you are being overcharged OR the child is not yours and you still have to pay OR your wife is threatening to take all your money OR other pending cases
5: Empty out your U.S. bank accounts and move to a "non-extradition treaty" country.FAST!
rexx123456 3 years ago 6
I have come to a conclusion. As long as these types of men are running the system, America's men don't stand a chance. So what to do??? LEAVE THIS COUNTRY AND DON"T LOOK BACK.
Look for a place where:
1: Child support laws do not exist (because they are never meant for the child).
2: Women are not held above men in media, law or society
3: It is located outside of the western countries.
4: Abortion is not allowed (this is the core of feminism and anti-male laws in history)
rexx123456 3 years ago 8
you sir are one of the smartest people on youtube
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 4
Why wouldn't you stop?
IbnSheba 3 years ago
cause she wouldnt be able to say a word properly in any language between my dick, finger and tongue
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 3
That's Creepy
IbnSheba 3 years ago
well unless your a guy i dont know what you are cause any who read that would like it
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 2
How do you know I am not a guy?
IbnSheba 3 years ago
(clears throat) 'UNLESS YOUR A GUY' reread my previous post, i dont know/care if your a guy but im assuming you are.
P.S. what i also meant to say in my previous post was 'cause any girl who reads that would like it'
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 3
JUST PLAIN SICK
IbnSheba 3 years ago
RAPE IS RAPE!! STOP TRYING TO JUSTIFY iT!!
planetmine 3 years ago
your right, BUT THIS WASNT RAPE SMART ASS IT WAS SOME BITCH THAT FELT SORRY SHE LET 2 GUYS FUCK HER
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 2
Man, u sound like u got sum damn issues with women...don't take it out on the rest*
Smart ass?? hmm..what a compliment! thanks ASSHOLE!
planetmine 3 years ago
---She said STOP! We don't know why, but she said it. Perhaps her vaginia was sore or she felt ill. The correct & respectful thing for those men to do was to stop. (males can always jack off, later). So what's wrong with having the law compell these men to stop, as she said, as they should?
---At least the law sees her as a person, with feelings. One can only imagine how these males viewed her, once they got her to agree to something.
IbnSheba 3 years ago
they viewed her for what she was A WHORE, what else is she if she let 2 guys fuck her almost simultaneously. and its funny how you dont mention that the guys where under age and she wasnt making her not only a whore but a pedophile, but i guess since it wasnt a man that did that its ok, shes human with feelings
her pussy cant be all that sore as stretched out like a rubber band as it must of been that she couldnt take 2 unripe under age bananas
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 4
---Your saying they didn't stop because they were too young and immature? When did their age come into this? And why? If a person says stop you stop; That's basic respect. It doesn't matter why or when.
---As for the law, it should, and thankfully does, support basic respect. That respect should be shown & enforced. The legal definition given to a jury may seem harsh. But more rape convictions would tame those males that treat people like things there just to provide sex.
IbnSheba 3 years ago
hell if i no y they didnt stop, point is had she not fucked 2 under age guys that wouldnt have happened to her. so the law supports basic respect eh, i guess since neither u or the law seem to have a problem with this girl statutory rapin these guys i guess its ok if a 25 or 30 yr old guy has sex with a 14 and 15 yr old girl, unless your a hypocrite (we all know the law already is), if u let 2 guys fuck you back 2 back then u R just a thing to provide sex as no 1 worth anything would do that
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
---I see any comments you make based upon specific facts that are not in the video I commented upon as bogus. My comments are about the LAW & RESPECT. Please, answer them directly. I have no interest in watching your videos if you can't or won't stay focused.
---Also you should assume less! I happen to be male.
IbnSheba 3 years ago
u r a mindless idiot, just cause its not in my video u cant use your brain to figure out the logic - no matter what happened 2 her, had she not broken the law by stat. rapin those guys nothing would have happened- i am focused and if u dont want 2 watch my videos i couldnt give less of a fuck than i do now in fact lemme help u (BAM) your blocked now u imbecile
also since my assumptions where right telling me to assume less is very stupid, since i am right if anything i should assume more
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 4
the difference between rape and sex is consent. sex is an ongoing process; this is primarily why we enjoy it so much. there is no socially inconvenient time for a woman or man to change their mind for whatever annoying or legitimate reason. why does it make a difference between having sex and preparing for sex? sure the former is more annoying but that doesn't make it void
siobhan1sadlier 3 years ago
do you really believe that you wrote. its obvious your not a straight male. try saying that in court
"i wanted to have sex with him but in the middle of it i really decided that were just not for each other so i want to stop" or something to that effect and see if any intelligent judge wouldnt laugh at you.
let me try to sum up my 3 part rape law vid 4 u. if you have ANY doubts about the person thats about to fuck you, during sex is NOT the time to let them know, way b4 sex is, get it now.
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
people's public personality and sexual personality can be entirely different things. a female could meet a male who before any sexual contact appears to be considerate and gentle but during intercourse could become violent and abusive. there would have been no possible way to identify that in someone before sleeping with them therefore consent is totally justifiable...
thentheychopped 3 years ago
yes there is a possible way its called etting to know someone. nothing is guranteed but thats why people get to know the person first if the person is an angel its a less likely chance that the person is going to be a demon during sex (in a bad way not the good way) and vice versa. so what you just said didnt add up at all
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 2
the fact that you used the word "likely" there destroys your entire argument because you're admitting there is a chance that a violent sexual experience could take place even if the person "seems" to be genuine. it obviously did add up as the issue still stands.
thentheychopped 3 years ago
god your stupid all of what you say has NOTHING to do with THIS CASE. and no it dosnt still stand especially since what brought this law about didnt even happen the way your describing. there was no force or violence or anything.
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
the point of a law is to deal with a multitude of situations not just one singular case.
thentheychopped 3 years ago
thats all well and fine, if this law came from a case that was actually rape then i could understand it more, yet it came from some whore that felt ashamed she let two guys run a train thorugh her and now all suffer
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 2
...you are saying that is a male deliberately seduced a female and them gave the physical and emotional experience of rape they would be unable to try the perpetrator in court. is that not justice?
thentheychopped 3 years ago
what the hell r u talkin about no its not justice in this case there was no voilence she just wanted to stop in the middle of it. its like flying in a plane once you take off you cant say to the flight attendant oh i dont want to fly anymore let me off. you cant turn sex into rape. if you want it at the start you cant just unwant it while its happening. before it happens yes but not while its going on
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago 2
"in this case" yes in that case but what about all of the other cases that leave women in ruin? sex can and does turn into rape. i know someone who was raped anally by her husband during sex that was extremely painful and humilating for her. but by your reasoning, because she said yes to a sexual experience, even if it was a horrific one the female involved would be totally unjustified to take this man to court.
what you are saying implies that you are an incredibly ignorant and selfish person.
thentheychopped 3 years ago
yes but what about the guys that get srewed over by women using sex laws to do what ever they want rather than as protection. your the ignorant one. just cause she took it up the ass and didnt like it dosnt mean its rape, you bitches seem to like to throw the word rape and sexual harrassment around too much. if she did something like hit him in the balls during sex he couldnt take her to court for sexual assault or anything to that effect so be fair and call it down the middle u feminist bitch
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
well it has become remarkably obvious what the problem is here. we're misunderstanding each other. it's so simple. you think i'm a man hating feminist who defends women who distort the law for their personal agenda.
and i thought you were intelligent enough to understand the point i'm trying to make. but it turns out you are not. i am done with this argument as it is truly a lost cause, you will NEVER be able to grasp the concept i'm describing and so my advice to you is...
thentheychopped 3 years ago
...get yourself sterilised you fucking moron, because the thought of you pumping out a demon seed, (possibly after the female involved has howled, fought and begged you to stop fucking her because you're hurting her, but hey, she said yes once and that's good enough for you right?) and creating life to pass on your defective genetic material and your ammoral, backwards, opinions saddens me. you are a prime example of why this fucking failing species is such a blight on the surface of the planet.
thentheychopped 3 years ago
u rite all this shit that sounds like it came from a 5 grade retard and want 2 come 2 me about intelligence. u r a fool. (i bet your gonna make up some profiles pretending 2 b friends u dont have and then comment making it seem like you got ppl behind u) im not going 2 fight with u cause a person reading might not b able 2 tell who the imbecile is just remember if u can even get a guy thats drunk and high 2 fuck u its not rape when u want it, get it, then regret it after its done
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
wow im amazed this cud really fuck guys up
ILoveAirStabs 3 years ago
yup i say have a video recorder going proving that she wanted it......just in case
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
disinterested ? i'm going to to start using that.
lilmofrance111 3 years ago
if u can cheat death then go for it, cause thats what the guy that u give blueballs to will bring
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
I noticed that no one said a word about these guys being 15 & 16 years old and the chick, who allowed them to sex her being 18.
In my book, that is RAPE. The chick raped these boys!
Question
Why was that so easily forgotten?
EV
Evens1 3 years ago
shit thats news 2 me i didnt even no that, the news paper didnt say it and thats where i got it from
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
not so much; but CHILD MOLESTER, yes. i wonder if she was about to get caught, so she filed YET ANOTHER FALSE ALLEGATION of "RAPE" -claiming AS USUAL that she was the victim (when she could've very possibly BEEN THE INSTIGATOR) in an effort to EVADE/PERVERT the course of "justice"... scarring the lives of those kids FOREVER. RAPE!!! RAPE!!!
firebloodjsa 3 years ago
Yes, I agree CHILD MOLESTER
From what the articles said, she invited them into her car to have sex with her. She wanted to older kid but was scared of the 15 year old because he was big.
You would think that Sistah Da Molester would be in prison right now, but the system turned to whole case around.
I suspect that there is going to be a WHOLE LOT OF INSANITY due to this case as more and more guys get caught up in BS over BS.
EV
Evens1 3 years ago 3
Because if you have tits and a vagina, the statutory rape laws don't apply to you. Hence you could be 45 and fuck a 13 year old boy and you will do NO jail time. This happens all the time. Great justice system, huh?
rexx123456 3 years ago 7
Holy shit...You know now if a girl gets mad in MD all she has to do is fuck her BF and then afterwords go down to the police station and empty her twat for some dna testing and bam! ultimate punishment for here BF not letting her have that 7 dollar teddy bear at walmart (or whatever the issue is). I hope this shit doesnt end up all over the USA.
thatwwwguy 3 years ago
HA HA damn straight, these bitches in MD are spoiled rich bitches (daddy's money), yet i herd that CA,NY and miami FL bitches some how managed to be as bad if not worse, scary
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
Hold on now...remember you don't even need DNA to prove rape and even better, courts won't allow DNA evidence or lack thereof to clear your name either because you don't have tits. Priceless, isn't it?
rexx123456 3 years ago 6
Very sadly, I expect that a percentage of females will use this as a tool against men.
Thats what this decision (?) is designed to do. Divide! I don't expect that most guys will accept this sitting down!
Worse - since you can get more time for rape in MD than murder, I suspect that some males will simply kill the female if they know that they are setting him up.
This rule/law is insane and dangerous for everyone.
EV
Evens1 3 years ago
damn straight they gonna get killed if they try this shit with the wrong person, but something tells me that most guys dont know about this law. hell i didnt until i made this video and this law was in effect for over a year from what im getting.
its all fucked up. the one thing that was supposed to be so grat got fucked up by, desease, unwanted preg. and now this. whats the point of even doing it anymore
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
well that's NO OUT, is it? then the "autorities" could screw you with RAPE + MURDER... so; one can realize the issue (about "RAPE") is much more complex than that - IT'S ALL ABOUT PHEMINIST POWER & CONTROL (& NEGLECTING the BS it's based upon) the ONLY way to turn the current state of affairs (for the BETTER) regarding this "issue" is FOR MEN TO COMPLETELY REJECT SEXUAL BLACKMAIL. a ZERO-TOLERANCE policy. it's pussy-whipped wusses' that ENABLE this kind of POWER to CONTROL them & THE REST OF US
firebloodjsa 3 years ago
The biggest problem is that it is MEN who are creating laws like this AND it is the other men who WILL take this sitting down and just crack open another beer. I say this: screw guys who don't care about being screwed.
rexx123456 3 years ago 7
Baby testified that the woman agreed, as long as Baby would stop when she told him to.
The woman testified that Baby continued having sex with her for five to 10 seconds after she asked him to stop.
"I said, 'Stop,' and that's when he kept pushing it in, and I was pushing his knees to get off me," she testified.
Result = 15 years prison - 10 of which suspended.
Female is 18 years old. Baby and Wilson were 15 & 16.
......................
This is a great setup!
.............
EV
Evens1 3 years ago