@SomeoneYouNew better thanks to the film.To inspire P.Jackson.Ppl in these times can't live without 3D Specialeffect Boooomtastic movies. By the way guys or hater or however you would name yourself. Film from 1978!!!!!
Even though I saw the Peter Jackson Trilogy before this one, this earlier film has some great perks. I found it a little more frightening then the later film and the animation is really great looking. The only issues with the older version is the lack of character development and obvious mistake with Saruman's name (they constantley call him Aruman). But still I think anyone that has an interest for fantasy films should definitley watch this one, because it still holds up as a good film :D.
@4:42 The Planets of the Apes-looking orc's slow motion is unintentionally hilarious since Gandalf looks like he's waving his sword around like a baton.
Thanks so much for uploading this. It's obviously not perfect and it's easy to criticize this now, but 30 years ago this brought to life some of the ideas in Tolkien's books which were pretty tough for some kids to read, let alone visualize. Really enjoyed watching this again.
I guess because I'm such a big Bakshi fan, it's hard for to to hate this, I didn't like it when I saw it as a lil kid, but as an adult I can appreciate it a lot more. I think Bakshi did the best he could with Tolkien's books, which are not easy to adapt to film. The rotoscoping is kinda funky, but this film would have never seen the light of day if it had been animated hand drawn frame by frame with the same realistic character designs.
@AJDavid90 Jackson's screen play is based largely on this version...watch the layout more closely and you will see not just the screenplay, but even the voice acting had a major influence on Jackson's version. Jackson just put all the various artwork and animated versions together in one brilliant film. Easy to do when all the imaginative groundwork has been laid :)
@gudskyld Thats a reduces statement. What about Tolkien's work, and this film is so incomplete, and the return of the king is not even part of it, of course it played a part in Jackson's work but not a major one, and the director of this one says himself that he regrets doing the movie.
@AJDavid90 You are probably right in that it was Tolkien's work (the writings) that started it all. As far as images and intonations, this film went a long way to shaping how Jackson interpreted the first 2 volumes. What I intended to say is that a lot of Jackson's screen plays for the first 2 films were greatly inspired by this version. Look at details, you will see what I mean. The disappointing part is the ending and the way in which the darker side was interpreted.
i wonder, does Bakshi ever planned in cutting out Frodo and Sam meeting with Faramir, or he alredy cutted that out? it looks like it was never included
@KalleJularbo true. true. god, i freaking love this movie, more than the jackson ones.
please, check my channel for the LOTR Part One edit, not only it fixes the Saruman/Aruman issue, but the nonsensical narration at end is gone, and the ending are switched, so it makes the movie more like ''this is going to have a sequel''
but unfortnatly, it's not fully uploaded, only part 6 so far.
As much as I think Jackson's films created the greatest cinematic trilogy in history ... This film from 1978 was my first exposure to LOTR as a kid, and it was amazing!! There are actually screens from this that I prefer over Jacksons ... This film will always have a place in my LOTR heart.
Ps .... And those splattering blood scenes were scary as hell as a kid!!!!!
ok, i dont get why people HATE so much this movie, or ralph bakshi for relying so much in rotoscoping, master animator Richard Williams said in his book that you dont train animation, you learn it alone,you can reinvente the wheel, you take your choices and go on with it,in my opinion,the rotoscoping for this movie looked very beatiful, especially when it was posterized in the battle scenes, and Tim Burton worked on this!and its a far more accurate representation of the book thanthe jackson film
@crematedmemoir if youre going to adapt someone else's story, what's the point to change to fit your vision? make your own story! the big difference between jackson and bakshi, was that bakshi respected the original story, unlike jackson, which claimed to be ''long and boring'' and changed 90% of the scenes and dialogues.
If people had to remain completely faithful to the story, we'd be watching the same shit over again
Bakshi did it his way, Jackson did it his...there is absolutely nothing wrong with a director making the story as he sees fit. So stop winging and just watch the damn video
@crematedmemoir are you implying that i am trolling? i love the jackson films, they have decent pace and character development and cool action scenes, but i like the books more because that's exactly what tolkien said, and a lot of the characters were done better in the bakshi film than in the jackson film because they remained true to the book, also, it was the very first adaptation, and bakshi only got permission to do it because Tolkien's daughter loved what he did with Wizards (next post)
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa trolling, no...but making completely invalid points, yes. Tolkien wrote the story how he imagined it...Bakshi made his film as he imagined it...Jackson made his films as he imagined them...people should not have to work along restrictions that they don't want to work in...look at the Shining...completely different to the book, but the story was basically the same. BTW, how Bakshi got the rights to the book is completely irrelevant
@crematedmemoir i understand your point,and i have to say yes,they are valid, but that doesnt mean mine are not.i think you didnt get the whole''respect someone else's story''Bakshi made his vision on the books, but remained true to them because Tolkien didnt want anyone to make a film based on his books because they would change too much of the plot, and Bakshi knew that,and gained some extra credit for making a good movie (others may disagree),but to put his vision and remain true to thebooks
@crematedmemoir i dont know, Bakshi remained true to the book because he knew that if someone else do it theyre gonna change like 85% of the story, himself said that '' it wasnt my job to say: hey, take Gollum off and change these 2 scenes, my job was to say: that's what the genius said'' hell, even Jackson respected what he did with Lotr, it's your option to change someone else's story, if want to change, im okay with it, if you remain true, that's your option.
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa Um this version is no where near as faithful to the books as jacksons, not even close. At least the parts jackson changed makes sense when you hear the explanation. This movie leaves out chunks and chunks of the story.
@phenom568 you clearly haven't read the books, Jackson changed 90% of the story to begin with, and to be honest, Bakshi did leave out certain parts of the story, but it was because they were running on a very small bugdet and the studio only allowed 120 minutes of film while Jackson had 380, and plus, it was going to have a sequel, that means that a lot of things that werent developed or explained in the first film, they were going to develop it in the sequel
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa Don't waste your time, some people just refuse to understand or appreciate this film, or Bakshi. If it were simplistic & easy, it would be popular.
It's sad that you can tell which parts were made first. It's pretty clear The Shire and the journey to Rivendell from Bree were made first becuase they have great animation.
Then they did the Fellowship parts which are still fairly good,but a little spastic at the Balrog,and the Gollum scenes.
Then they did Boromir's death which was okay.
And it went downhill from there,and by Helm's Deep it's mostly tinted live-action. And clearly the prologue was last since it was all silohouettes
"...they are (or were) squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow-skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes; in fact degraded and repulsive versions of the (to Europeans) least lovely Mongol-types."
So it would seem like these orks, but I prefer PJ's or Rankin-Bass's.
@ojima510 fucking crap, i hate translated books, in the mexican edition the ork description is so diferent of that, i have to get the book in it´s original language
in the 70's, a huge collapse happened and they had to shortn bugdets and those beatiful animated disney movies died along with disney himself, and because of less money, less fluid movements and those pretty colors.
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa you're kidding right? fantasia was made in 1940 (to be precisely?). there had been better animation than this for years. this was cheaply done, rotoscoping, live action. smart idea, i guess, but it just does not look right, even by 70's standards if you look at the critics ratings. even the hobbit animated film, from a year before, was much better than this. it is not nearly as spastic and weird as this, and only made a year before, during the 'huge collapse' you speak of
My name is Gandalf and im a mad man swigging my sword around and acting like i need 2 go 2 the toilet. same everyday when im bored looking at monkey shaped things that hey call orc's
One thing that no one can take away from this movie is that it is more true to Tolkien's world than Jackson's movies. Tolkien drew his inspiration from the early middle ages, 476-1066, when describing the appearance of Middle Earth's people. His own paintings clearly goes to show this as well. Yet what do you see in Jackson's movies? Plate armor and an architecture very much too advanced. Rohan is the only faction of people true to Tolkien standards in Jackson's movies.
Obi wan said that the sand people who'd return in numbers..
Spokengro 15 hours ago
woot da faaack?
WegPutz3r 23 hours ago
Just one thing: 1978
CHEERS KIDDOS
luebz 1 day ago
this is like an ancient version of LoTR
TheDarkCommander 1 day ago
@TheDarkCommander Yeah this is the film based on Peter Jacksons Movie.He was a real fan of this film and copied a lot :) best wishes
luebz 1 day ago
i wonder how i came here
bewaker001 1 day ago
After seeing this all I can say is... Thank god for Peter Jackson
SomeoneYouNew 2 days ago
@SomeoneYouNew better thanks to the film.To inspire P.Jackson.Ppl in these times can't live without 3D Specialeffect Boooomtastic movies. By the way guys or hater or however you would name yourself. Film from 1978!!!!!
luebz 1 day ago
uh huh...(goes back to Peter Jackson version)
hardstylekid123 2 days ago
Seriously. What the fuck!?
WeScatterTheAshes 2 days ago
Probably one the suckiest movie or animation.
532Spartan 3 days ago
there are more lord of the rings, this is a part, look them up pretty cool for being so old :)
frankytap 3 days ago
Dafuq just happened?
SpeakNShredderFilms 4 days ago
but what happened to frodo
stewy722 4 days ago
wow this sucks major donkey balls.
AND A FUCKIN BALLAD IS PLAYING??!?! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME????
ersintas85 6 days ago
This movie is great. Much better than Jackson's
imthebest8710 1 week ago
@imthebest8710 YOU SHOULD BE STONED FOR BLASPHEMY!!!
marque27 2 days ago
@marque27 im just telling the truth
imthebest8710 1 day ago
that is some weird shit animation. did they film real people and then color over the top of them?
JustThink00 1 week ago
1:49 Gandalf? 0_o You're a viking?
SeanMaritz 1 week ago
@SeanMaritz It's Theoden
imthebest8710 1 week ago
all these disrespectful kids who do not know that there was history before 2000 ... I feel so sorry for them
menodred 1 week ago
Gasp! Tusken raiders! Oh wait...
bdoherty44 1 week ago
They were suppost to be Orcs and Uruk-Hai, not enormous Chimpanzees!
DalleDayul 1 week ago
Interesting animation style... the rest is crap
rpiperno 1 week ago
Comment removed
amaxamon 1 week ago
This is quite definitely the worst thing I've ever seen.
donutsrock 1 week ago
2:00 Why the hell would anyone jump from a horse ?
ivanlagrossemoule 1 week ago
since when were tusken raiders in lord of the rings
tobster40 2 weeks ago
1:07 what the hell is he doing xD
SuperMrGilles 2 weeks ago
Is this the end? What about Shelob and throwing the ring into the lava?
mrwhitemanvideo 2 weeks ago
i didn't knew that orcs were riding horses
larsieboy1000 2 weeks ago
This is a experimental movie.... brrrr.
artillerodecola 2 weeks ago
puissant !
lysbreguet 2 weeks ago
what the hell is this lol
didaksan92 2 weeks ago 27
@didaksan92
all we used to have.
JustThink00 1 week ago
Wow the orcs are much more creepy in this than the movies!
TheShadyFro 2 weeks ago 20
Gandalf looks like Merlin.
Elojoquenoparpadea22 2 weeks ago
lol this are gorillas not orc.
kurseng 2 weeks ago
the guy who made that video for metallica do this too?
cabs85 3 weeks ago
What the heck is this trashy animation? The "rotoscoping" is absolutely painful, and the color palette is drab at best. Blech...
Bunnyhop777 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Even though I saw the Peter Jackson Trilogy before this one, this earlier film has some great perks. I found it a little more frightening then the later film and the animation is really great looking. The only issues with the older version is the lack of character development and obvious mistake with Saruman's name (they constantley call him Aruman). But still I think anyone that has an interest for fantasy films should definitley watch this one, because it still holds up as a good film :D.
MrMonsterMan1001 3 weeks ago
the fuck this is gross
ThexNaaru 3 weeks ago
this is Lord of the Rings or Planet of the Apes :P
angelcassiel13 3 weeks ago
@angelcassiel13 I guess is Lord of the Apes!
Elojoquenoparpadea22 2 weeks ago
atleast its colour...
tysswe1 3 weeks ago
Uhh.. I thought I was watching an Indians VS cowboy animation movie...
CaptainJaller 3 weeks ago
This movie was probably state-of-the-art when it came out ~35 years ago... I'm glad that we have Peter Jackson and Weta Workshops.
Stupid Orc at 4:05 "Umm... should I be doing something?"
joshlmr 3 weeks ago
BETTER THAT THE NEW ONE! AWESOME!
kalonga52 3 weeks ago
@kalonga52 Totally agree, the new ones don't have this feel to it, except for a hollywood feel
closelynibbledgrass 2 weeks ago
the music that plays when Gandalf charges reminds me of Smurfs
Hordeman89 3 weeks ago
hahahahahh thank god they did a update :P
TheLeonMati 4 weeks ago
meh
warboys6789 4 weeks ago
@Leftysfive93 thanks ^^ xD
CiaeKirai 4 weeks ago
@4:42 The Planets of the Apes-looking orc's slow motion is unintentionally hilarious since Gandalf looks like he's waving his sword around like a baton.
Leftysfive93 4 weeks ago
Gandalf (?) looks like a nordic god in 2:43
CiaeKirai 1 month ago
@CiaeKirai ah sry that isn't gandalf Dx
CiaeKirai 1 month ago
@CiaeKirai It's Theoden, King of Rohan.
Leftysfive93 4 weeks ago
@CiaeKirai its Theoden
11vivisection11 4 weeks ago
@11vivisection11 thx xD
CiaeKirai 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
CiaeKirai 1 month ago
I thought that this was LOTR. Must have clicked on Planet of the Apes by accident, whoops.
InsanityComedyM 1 month ago
0:19 Altair?
ghostbanha 1 month ago
Thanks so much for uploading this. It's obviously not perfect and it's easy to criticize this now, but 30 years ago this brought to life some of the ideas in Tolkien's books which were pretty tough for some kids to read, let alone visualize. Really enjoyed watching this again.
jkjerome1 1 month ago
I cannot wait for The Hobbit.
Areopagitican 1 month ago
they look like monkeys and tusken raiders :P haha
perkelepower 1 month ago
4:33 Gandalf's terrible accuracy
killer7magnummatt 1 month ago
@killer7magnummatt LOL HAUYHAUAHUA eu ri muito
wolflink06041992 1 month ago
the orc at 1:05 has the rite idea...
screwthistheresnone 1 month ago
Comment removed
screwthistheresnone 1 month ago
lol at :34
thinkbad42 1 month ago
lol.. jesus helped creating this movie... it says so in the end credits
wickyWichie 1 month ago
i just love the orcs so savage and unmerciful, you better not get in my path attitude, love it.
cujo9 1 month ago
The only bad thing about this is there's actually not as many people in the battle as implied in the book itself... But otherwise, really nice :D
Luka1180 1 month ago
It's a crude rendition.
osmosys808 1 month ago
GANDALF!! GANDALF!!
Yourpasswords 1 month ago
I guess because I'm such a big Bakshi fan, it's hard for to to hate this, I didn't like it when I saw it as a lil kid, but as an adult I can appreciate it a lot more. I think Bakshi did the best he could with Tolkien's books, which are not easy to adapt to film. The rotoscoping is kinda funky, but this film would have never seen the light of day if it had been animated hand drawn frame by frame with the same realistic character designs.
Chickengirl005 2 months ago
@Chickengirl005
I rather like the rotoscoping - considering the period of time it was made, this movie looks rather realistic in certain parts.
KataclysmKat 1 month ago
It makes me like the movie trilogy even more! I rate this movie 4 out a 10 at best, but it's a zero in comparison to Jackson's version.
AJDavid90 2 months ago in playlist More videos from brasz101
@AJDavid90 Jackson's screen play is based largely on this version...watch the layout more closely and you will see not just the screenplay, but even the voice acting had a major influence on Jackson's version. Jackson just put all the various artwork and animated versions together in one brilliant film. Easy to do when all the imaginative groundwork has been laid :)
gudskyld 2 months ago
@gudskyld Thats a reduces statement. What about Tolkien's work, and this film is so incomplete, and the return of the king is not even part of it, of course it played a part in Jackson's work but not a major one, and the director of this one says himself that he regrets doing the movie.
AJDavid90 2 months ago
@AJDavid90 You are probably right in that it was Tolkien's work (the writings) that started it all. As far as images and intonations, this film went a long way to shaping how Jackson interpreted the first 2 volumes. What I intended to say is that a lot of Jackson's screen plays for the first 2 films were greatly inspired by this version. Look at details, you will see what I mean. The disappointing part is the ending and the way in which the darker side was interpreted.
gudskyld 1 month ago
@gudskyld ridicules I mean*
AJDavid90 2 months ago
this looks funny with the snowflake option :D
merryhappy95 2 months ago
The Peter Jackson version is way better.
MrImastinker 2 months ago
@MrImastinker
This version is way older
placid1205 2 months ago
@MrImastinker captain obvious strikes again!!!!!
ScoTTishN1NJA 2 months ago
The music from 3:10 to 3:50 is freakin' epic.
TKDLION 2 months ago
wow someone rendered this good
maestroanth 2 months ago
i wonder, does Bakshi ever planned in cutting out Frodo and Sam meeting with Faramir, or he alredy cutted that out? it looks like it was never included
RodimusFilmsnThings 2 months ago
@RodimusFilmsnThings He planned to make a sequel but didnt do it. Unfortunately. =(
KalleJularbo 2 months ago
@KalleJularbo true. true. god, i freaking love this movie, more than the jackson ones.
please, check my channel for the LOTR Part One edit, not only it fixes the Saruman/Aruman issue, but the nonsensical narration at end is gone, and the ending are switched, so it makes the movie more like ''this is going to have a sequel''
but unfortnatly, it's not fully uploaded, only part 6 so far.
RodimusFilmsnThings 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RodimusFilmsnThings : He planne don making a sequel but didnt do it.
Unfortunately. =(
KalleJularbo 2 months ago
still not a great film, but far better than its sequel, return of the king 1980 is simply awful
AuntySemitist 2 months ago
3:55 GANDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!
"The forces of darkness were driven forever from the face of middle earth" wait a sec have you forgotten the RING??????? What about SAURON???
swrandomartist17 2 months ago
Comment removed
swrandomartist17 2 months ago
is this a action film or a cartoon...the world may never know
kpzN4W 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:36 lol wut?
ScoTTishN1NJA 3 months ago
Comment removed
ScoTTishN1NJA 3 months ago
As much as I think Jackson's films created the greatest cinematic trilogy in history ... This film from 1978 was my first exposure to LOTR as a kid, and it was amazing!! There are actually screens from this that I prefer over Jacksons ... This film will always have a place in my LOTR heart.
Ps .... And those splattering blood scenes were scary as hell as a kid!!!!!
joeylodes 3 months ago
Why do the orcs look like gorillas? WAIT: RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES SNEAK PEAK?!?! *gasp*
gtglolrofl 3 months ago
ok, i dont get why people HATE so much this movie, or ralph bakshi for relying so much in rotoscoping, master animator Richard Williams said in his book that you dont train animation, you learn it alone,you can reinvente the wheel, you take your choices and go on with it,in my opinion,the rotoscoping for this movie looked very beatiful, especially when it was posterized in the battle scenes, and Tim Burton worked on this!and its a far more accurate representation of the book thanthe jackson film
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa cool story bro
gtglolrofl 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa
which bible dictates that every damn adapted film MUST be 100% faithful to the book?
That's fucking ridiculous
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@crematedmemoir if youre going to adapt someone else's story, what's the point to change to fit your vision? make your own story! the big difference between jackson and bakshi, was that bakshi respected the original story, unlike jackson, which claimed to be ''long and boring'' and changed 90% of the scenes and dialogues.
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa
I'm sorry mate, but that's bullshit!
Jackson wanted to ADAPT LOTR, not COPY it
It's just another artist's rendition of the story
If people had to remain completely faithful to the story, we'd be watching the same shit over again
Bakshi did it his way, Jackson did it his...there is absolutely nothing wrong with a director making the story as he sees fit. So stop winging and just watch the damn video
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@crematedmemoir are you implying that i am trolling? i love the jackson films, they have decent pace and character development and cool action scenes, but i like the books more because that's exactly what tolkien said, and a lot of the characters were done better in the bakshi film than in the jackson film because they remained true to the book, also, it was the very first adaptation, and bakshi only got permission to do it because Tolkien's daughter loved what he did with Wizards (next post)
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa trolling, no...but making completely invalid points, yes. Tolkien wrote the story how he imagined it...Bakshi made his film as he imagined it...Jackson made his films as he imagined them...people should not have to work along restrictions that they don't want to work in...look at the Shining...completely different to the book, but the story was basically the same. BTW, how Bakshi got the rights to the book is completely irrelevant
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@crematedmemoir i understand your point,and i have to say yes,they are valid, but that doesnt mean mine are not.i think you didnt get the whole''respect someone else's story''Bakshi made his vision on the books, but remained true to them because Tolkien didnt want anyone to make a film based on his books because they would change too much of the plot, and Bakshi knew that,and gained some extra credit for making a good movie (others may disagree),but to put his vision and remain true to thebooks
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa
Dude, really? How did Jackson not respect the story? He just made his own version of LOTR...there's nothing wrong with doing that
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@crematedmemoir he said that it was ''long and boring'' and made his own version of LOTR, i love his movies, theyre entertaining.
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa
exactly! So why should he have completely conformed to the book?
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@crematedmemoir i dont know, Bakshi remained true to the book because he knew that if someone else do it theyre gonna change like 85% of the story, himself said that '' it wasnt my job to say: hey, take Gollum off and change these 2 scenes, my job was to say: that's what the genius said'' hell, even Jackson respected what he did with Lotr, it's your option to change someone else's story, if want to change, im okay with it, if you remain true, that's your option.
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa
ok, so you finally came out and said it...good stuff
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@crematedmemoir i just resumed everything i said so far to you, and you finally agree.
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa
no dude...at the start you were complaining about directors not being faithful to the books and that that was bad...
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@crematedmemoir i just said that this was more faithful to the film than the Jackson film, i wasnt bashing anything.
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa
sounded like you were...
crematedmemoir 3 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa Um this version is no where near as faithful to the books as jacksons, not even close. At least the parts jackson changed makes sense when you hear the explanation. This movie leaves out chunks and chunks of the story.
phenom568 2 months ago
@phenom568 you clearly haven't read the books, Jackson changed 90% of the story to begin with, and to be honest, Bakshi did leave out certain parts of the story, but it was because they were running on a very small bugdet and the studio only allowed 120 minutes of film while Jackson had 380, and plus, it was going to have a sequel, that means that a lot of things that werent developed or explained in the first film, they were going to develop it in the sequel
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 2 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa Don't waste your time, some people just refuse to understand or appreciate this film, or Bakshi. If it were simplistic & easy, it would be popular.
amaxamon 2 months ago
@amaxamon true bro. i really like this film, despite it's flaws, i even made an edit called ''the part one edit'' wich fixes the Saruman aruman thing
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 2 months ago
its ralph bakshi you idiots... its supposed to look like this...
reactor303 3 months ago
This would have given me nightmares as a kid
Rebphoenix 3 months ago
the sand people did return...and in greater numbers (10,000) just a obi wan predicted
ScoTTishN1NJA 3 months ago 79
@ScoTTishN1NJA Actually, they bear more resemblance to monkeys...
LordFhalkyn 2 months ago
is it really that hard to draw armor on people? Is this movie so small budget they didn't have enough graphite to make people look decent?
FallenTemplar1405 3 months ago
2:44 LEGO shield
apocalyptica003 4 months ago 26
@apocalyptica003 that's no shield that's a Diablo 2 Buckler :))
Alintorith 4 weeks ago
It's sad that you can tell which parts were made first. It's pretty clear The Shire and the journey to Rivendell from Bree were made first becuase they have great animation.
Then they did the Fellowship parts which are still fairly good,but a little spastic at the Balrog,and the Gollum scenes.
Then they did Boromir's death which was okay.
And it went downhill from there,and by Helm's Deep it's mostly tinted live-action. And clearly the prologue was last since it was all silohouettes
Warriorcats64 4 months ago
it looks a bit like LOTR and rise of the planet of the apes,
i mean, look at those 'orks', they're just chimpanzees
ojima510 4 months ago 2
@ojima510 do you know how an ork loks like???
andespuri 4 months ago
@andespuri well, Tolkien describes them as:
"...they are (or were) squat, broad, flat-nosed, sallow-skinned, with wide mouths and slant eyes; in fact degraded and repulsive versions of the (to Europeans) least lovely Mongol-types."
So it would seem like these orks, but I prefer PJ's or Rankin-Bass's.
ojima510 4 months ago
@ojima510 fucking crap, i hate translated books, in the mexican edition the ork description is so diferent of that, i have to get the book in it´s original language
andespuri 4 months ago
This is the best part of the movie, the music really gets me pumped. This soundtrack is fucking amazing.
CtrlRm 4 months ago
yay for history lessons. alas my knowledge has been defeated good show sir good show, now htf do you know that lol
therealTaichiYagami 4 months ago
ok wtf they had much better animations when this came out I'm pretty sure fantasia came out before this
therealTaichiYagami 4 months ago
@therealTaichiYagami WAY before fantasia, 20 years to be presicely,
in the 70's, a huge collapse happened and they had to shortn bugdets and those beatiful animated disney movies died along with disney himself, and because of less money, less fluid movements and those pretty colors.
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 4 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa you're kidding right? fantasia was made in 1940 (to be precisely?). there had been better animation than this for years. this was cheaply done, rotoscoping, live action. smart idea, i guess, but it just does not look right, even by 70's standards if you look at the critics ratings. even the hobbit animated film, from a year before, was much better than this. it is not nearly as spastic and weird as this, and only made a year before, during the 'huge collapse' you speak of
MrAsthomas 4 months ago
@MrAsthomas notice how disney barely released a film in the 70's
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 4 months ago
@aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa the rescuers? aristocats? winnie the pooh? ROBIN HOOD?????
MrAsthomas 4 months ago
@MrAsthomas ok, you win, but it's not like they got REAL attention, Walt Disney was alredy dead
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 4 months ago
Go Panoramix
DanteTrickster 4 months ago
geez those orcs (?) at the beggining look so awkward.
Omegalucario98 4 months ago
So, this is where Disney's Merlin got hired after that Arthur movie...
SomeoneCommenting 4 months ago
Press 5 for the longest yell, ever.
Dordrius 4 months ago
the sword inpales ganondalf XD
kiraofthewasteland 4 months ago
3:20 the music almost made me cry
MFcrazy16 5 months ago
@MFcrazy16 me too. if it wasnt because of the music, id say this film would be suckage.
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 5 months ago
My name is Gandalf and im a mad man swigging my sword around and acting like i need 2 go 2 the toilet. same everyday when im bored looking at monkey shaped things that hey call orc's
DragonsLord123 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i dont know you guys but the score in this movie is fucking awesome
manly in the battle scenes
aquelescaraaaaaaaaaa 5 months ago
There's always one, when everyone's lined up for that family picture some dumb orc has to wiggle his spear at the camera.
5:20 should totally have some orc getting hit in the head by Gandalf's sword as they ride past. That would have been an epic ending
demonlak 5 months ago
Damn, it´s painfully obvious that they just traced most of the animation... D:
TophRaven 5 months ago
So... is that a monkey?
johnnyklit 5 months ago
wow. this makes the new one look rubish
RowanEvansMusic 5 months ago
rotoscoping looks so wierd
b0bthekillar 5 months ago
0:02 he needs a dentist lmao :P
emmatuck 6 months ago
@emmatuck I think most characters in this version of The Lord of the Rings need a dentist!
SuperJackjack13 5 months ago
One thing that no one can take away from this movie is that it is more true to Tolkien's world than Jackson's movies. Tolkien drew his inspiration from the early middle ages, 476-1066, when describing the appearance of Middle Earth's people. His own paintings clearly goes to show this as well. Yet what do you see in Jackson's movies? Plate armor and an architecture very much too advanced. Rohan is the only faction of people true to Tolkien standards in Jackson's movies.
Faxe90Swe 6 months ago
@Faxe90Swe thats what i thought too... but i still love the films :D this cartoon however will always be seperate perfection on its own. love it :D
emmatuck 6 months ago
Aragorn the trouserless Mexican.
dman19851996 6 months ago 2
Aragorn really needs to buy a pair of pants....
valawen 6 months ago in playlist Lord of the Rings
Thank god we have the peter jackson version
Eminem51311 6 months ago
terrible terrible terrible movie!
REKONBALL2 6 months ago
where are the orcs< i dont remember the apes and sandpeople in the Books.
VaatiPownsNoobs 7 months ago
Let's celebrate our victory by throwing our swords straight up into the air!!!
DesolationAngel101 7 months ago 41
This music doesn't really fit the context. It's a great march but sounds like it belongs in like "Bridge on the river Kwai" or something.
Methrt3 7 months ago
@Methrt3 Actually I think it sounds a lot like the music from The Great Escape.
SavageVandar 6 months ago
Well...Did frodo finally got there in time to throw the ring into the fire and live happly ever after?!
359lillian 7 months ago
Why does Aragorn look like a native american?
MrKingMacca 7 months ago
AND THE END??? WTF!
TheBrightmanFan 7 months ago 3
@TheBrightmanFan They didn't have money to make any more.
CtrlRm 7 months ago