WOW...This is awful....It's his song, and unfortunately he can't find the beauty of it IMO...Jeff still wears the crown....Just an opinion..don't riot <33
remember the original is always the best .... because it is he who deserves all the credit ... covers are covers no matter how catchy they sound .... btw this is not even the original version by cohen .....
There is NO comparison. The author is full of genuine soul, while the other is empty. Nice voice, but little passion for me.....I'm glad he did it though, as more people need to hear this
There is NO comparison. The author is full of genuine soul, while the other is empty. Nice voice, but little passion for me.....I'm glad he did it though, as more peole need to hear this
@txsailorboy Ok....I agree that Cohen has a great amount of passion, but how can you say Jeff buckley's is empty? I feel like you're just saying that to emphasize a point. Jeff Buckley can't have been empty when he covered the song to have sang it like he did. There's no way. You can almost hear the tears.
It is stupid to compare. First, Lenard is a prolific writer... a great singer, maybe not, but as a writer and performer, hard to beat. There are many artists out their that took this song, and vocally blew the sucker out of the park, and we can thank mr. cohen for that...they all can. Such a beautiful song, and when you hear it from an artist with an amazing voice and is able to convey the passion, it is very emotional.
I love you tube, it just opens everything up. But I see so many people just detract, detract, detract. Man, if this song doesn't open your heart up and make you want to soar, I feel for ya.
The song is excellent and the author always has the right to change up his own lyrics. Likewise, to do someone else's music; you have to make it your own. Otherwise, it becomes a cheap copy. Every version I have heard from Leonard Cohen are excellent but so is Jeff Buckleys version. If I were to do a version, it would be with these lyrics and melody line. It has to be real and from the heart to make it great. I wonder what a Peter Himmelman version would sound like?
Mature, powerful, passionate performance incomparable with the other singers' versions And he is different in different versions of his . Listen to all of them to get the full idea.
@mrkwt77 Agreed. Don't think Buckley's version was elevated by vocals. Think it's the guitar. Vocals, KD Lang. Best interpretation, yeah, of course, Cohen. He takes his own lyrics, and clangs all the bells, everything you might have thought about them but others ignored, there in the way he sings.
You can't do this contest in fairness without including John Cale, who is the one that is responsible for taking Leonard Cohen's tonal poem, and turning it into a worldwide phenomena. - Kate Voegele - Jeff Buckley - Rufus Wainwright - Alexandra Burke
were all based on John Cale's cover. Even Leonard Cohen modified his own performance to sound more like John Cale's cover.
This is NOT Leonard's original either. The first & mystical best in MHO is on his album Various Positions (1985)...that begins,
"I heard there was a secret chord
that David played and it pleased the Lord, but you don't really care for music, do ya. It goes like this, the 4th the 5th, the minor fall the major lift;
He, in my opinion. created this song, and without him, there would be no spectacular Jeff Buckley version. Also, he sort-of looks like Dustin Hoffman in the picture.
One of the dumber ideas in the history of YouTube in making this a "contest" about one of the most beautiful songs ever written. Great song cheapened by sophomoric mentality
@MO0OSIK I tend to agree with him actually and it looks like I'm not the only one. Cohens original (not this version) is in my opinion the best version, I love the lyrics in this version but the phrasing just doesn't quite feel right to me.
I preffer jeff buckley's version...they both have very expressive voices, and the music sounds beautiful in the two versions, but in my opinion buckley's voice suits the music better (although it was written by cohen) - and it sounds wonderfull with simpler background music.
There are many verses to this song. This is the original and the composer (Cohen) chose to use "Baby I've been here before.." The version we are ALL familiar & fell in love with is the one we heard in the soundtrack of Shrek by Wainwright. This version was first performed in the early 90's sung and arranged by Jeff Buckley. He is the one who originally resurrected it and, changed a few words and left some extra ones out, so it is simple, perfect poetry.
Actually the one in the movie was by John Cale, and it was recorded years earlier. The more sexual lyrics were removed. Wainwright recorded the version on the soundtrack, but on youtube, the version is frequently Cale's.
I thought the voice in the movie was different and couldnt understand why that wasnt the one used on the soundtrack. Everyone pretty much glorifies Wainwright for the song. It is interesting how one artist can rework something and make it so new it resounds to a WHOLE new audience. Thank you for the information. I will have to get his version. He deserves praise for what he has done, and, seemingly goes unnoticed by most of us!
Cohen recorded it in 1984, Cale did his cover in 1992, Buckley in 1993 (followed the Cale cover). Cale's version (edited) appeared in the movie, Shrek, years later but Wainwright was under contract so he recorded the soundtrack. It started to explode from there. Cohen began to follow Cale's version of his original song, since most people wouldn't recognize the 1980's version any more.
I think Buckley misses the point. He makes it a sad song all the way through. But the intent of the Hallelujah chorus in Cohen's has the tenor of someone confused and baffled who nonetheless cries out a Hallelujah. How somehow we manage the cries of joy even when we feel dismal and, most of all, within love, which can have us crying 'Hallelujah' even when it tears us apart. Buckley's unchanging slow tempo doesn't convey that.
the version ive heared has a verse about the name of god or something and the live versions are different again, bucklies version i like but he sounds really sad
I like Cohen's version the best, but I prefer the original album version and the live versions he does now. It just sounds weird starting a a verse other than "I've heard there was a secret chord"
Leonard Cohen wrote it, but K.D. Lang owns it.
BarerMender 2 months ago
Yes,this is one of his best songs
B5C2O4d7 4 months ago
WOW...This is awful....It's his song, and unfortunately he can't find the beauty of it IMO...Jeff still wears the crown....Just an opinion..don't riot <33
rochey1010 4 months ago
No contest. Buckley is the best. Gives me chills.
ISSOLT 4 months ago
remember the original is always the best .... because it is he who deserves all the credit ... covers are covers no matter how catchy they sound .... btw this is not even the original version by cohen .....
salhawk 5 months ago
I'll stand before the Lord of Song
With nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah
susankhamilton 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is NO comparison. The author is full of genuine soul, while the other is empty. Nice voice, but little passion for me.....I'm glad he did it though, as more people need to hear this
txsailorboy 7 months ago in playlist Christian
There is NO comparison. The author is full of genuine soul, while the other is empty. Nice voice, but little passion for me.....I'm glad he did it though, as more peole need to hear this
txsailorboy 7 months ago in playlist Christian
@txsailorboy Ok....I agree that Cohen has a great amount of passion, but how can you say Jeff buckley's is empty? I feel like you're just saying that to emphasize a point. Jeff Buckley can't have been empty when he covered the song to have sang it like he did. There's no way. You can almost hear the tears.
ThePinkwafflecakes 4 months ago
If you want the best version -- only Leonard Cohen. He has given a gift to others to shine, but none will ever do this song his justice...
nittersnits 1 year ago
By far the stupidest thing I have seen on YouTube.
Teodoraschannel 1 year ago
It is stupid to compare. First, Lenard is a prolific writer... a great singer, maybe not, but as a writer and performer, hard to beat. There are many artists out their that took this song, and vocally blew the sucker out of the park, and we can thank mr. cohen for that...they all can. Such a beautiful song, and when you hear it from an artist with an amazing voice and is able to convey the passion, it is very emotional.
beefwellington007 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i love this song!!!! if you have time please check out my piano cover, thx!
zitronesaft 1 year ago
i think jeff buckley is the best sang version
but you can hear that this is the original singer .. he sings it so pasionatly .. he really means what he sings what gives the song an amazing power
Martijn9 1 year ago
The winner will ALWAYS be the person that wrote the song.
qweeksdraw 1 year ago 2
I love you tube, it just opens everything up. But I see so many people just detract, detract, detract. Man, if this song doesn't open your heart up and make you want to soar, I feel for ya.
DiZastur 1 year ago
@DiZastur -- hallelujah!!! brother ... hallelujah!
ronbellaz 1 year ago
its his song, so he can do what he wants with it.
Leonard Cohen , The best..)))
pretender2u 1 year ago
The song is excellent and the author always has the right to change up his own lyrics. Likewise, to do someone else's music; you have to make it your own. Otherwise, it becomes a cheap copy. Every version I have heard from Leonard Cohen are excellent but so is Jeff Buckleys version. If I were to do a version, it would be with these lyrics and melody line. It has to be real and from the heart to make it great. I wonder what a Peter Himmelman version would sound like?
jwbarnhartmusic 1 year ago
the cohen's version in dramatic, buckley is more sensual, it's only different styles.
MauricioPereiradaFon 2 years ago
Cohen is unchallengable!
Mature, powerful, passionate performance incomparable with the other singers' versions And he is different in different versions of his . Listen to all of them to get the full idea.
da19lila38 2 years ago
@da19lila38
U Got That Right! M8 =]
ecoo911 1 year ago
Thats not the original version from Cohen, see video posted by WolfenSteed to find the original one...
Then you'll be able te see (hear) that no one did better than Cohen himself
WeedyMellow 2 years ago
I like these words bettter actually Yes a little too slow but still very very beaitiful
upitertucson 2 years ago
Comment removed
WeedyMellow 2 years ago
well, this is the best version ever.This is it.
upitertucson 2 years ago
Axandra Buruke, The original, Jeff Buckey, John cale, Leonardo.
nini67h 2 years ago
This version is so boring. Ahhhhhhhhhhh.Boring!
nini67h 2 years ago
check out Kevin Bath's version of Hallelujah
mrdisco6 2 years ago
i dont exactly like this one that much lol but i always thought that the orignal should be the first best hahah
chookieJS 2 years ago
this isnt music.
this is poetry, beautiful poetry at that.
Buckley's version was this piece of beautiful poetry added with his own beautiful arrangement.
mrkwt77 2 years ago
@mrkwt77 Agreed. Don't think Buckley's version was elevated by vocals. Think it's the guitar. Vocals, KD Lang. Best interpretation, yeah, of course, Cohen. He takes his own lyrics, and clangs all the bells, everything you might have thought about them but others ignored, there in the way he sings.
brelfan 1 year ago
what's going on below.... eh? hmmmmm!
Now you don't even show it to me do ya!!!!! Hmmmmm!
I remember when i moved 'IN' you!...... eh? Hmmmmmmm! I wonder what on earth he could be talking about??????
; )
liamardo007 2 years ago
rufus voice after the original
Hcosl 2 years ago
1.Leonard Cohen(he has the original version and original stays original)
2.Jeff Buckley/John Cale
3.Myles Kennedy
Arnoldx1992 2 years ago
what about KD Lang? You must see her
azanorias296 2 years ago
Leonard Cohen's version of Buckley's "Hallelujah" is the best by far!
Just kidding everyone!
1.cohen
2.lang
3.buckley/kate
pervisirani 2 years ago
1. Jeff Buckley
2. Leonard Cohen
3. John Cale
The rest can piss off
erelamadferit 2 years ago
1st Kate Voegele
2nd John Cale
3rd Cohen
4th Bon Jovi
.
.
.
10000000000000th: Wainright xD
mACKs94 2 years ago
You can't do this contest in fairness without including John Cale, who is the one that is responsible for taking Leonard Cohen's tonal poem, and turning it into a worldwide phenomena. - Kate Voegele - Jeff Buckley - Rufus Wainwright - Alexandra Burke
were all based on John Cale's cover. Even Leonard Cohen modified his own performance to sound more like John Cale's cover.
frankantoniomartin 2 years ago
This is NOT Leonard's original either. The first & mystical best in MHO is on his album Various Positions (1985)...that begins,
"I heard there was a secret chord
that David played and it pleased the Lord, but you don't really care for music, do ya. It goes like this, the 4th the 5th, the minor fall the major lift;
the baffled king composing Hallelujah"....
JehanneDeLys 2 years ago 14
@JehanneDeLys - good point ... still whatever the question - Cohen's the winner.
jolangjolang 1 year ago
@JehanneDeLys lenoard did in 84
beefwellington007 1 year ago
i love iy, but i like Rufus Wrainwright's the best
timerssarah 2 years ago
There is no perfection of an original.
JohnCaren09 2 years ago 2
Imogen's is more soulful
maclordzafra 2 years ago
He, in my opinion. created this song, and without him, there would be no spectacular Jeff Buckley version. Also, he sort-of looks like Dustin Hoffman in the picture.
EverlastingCoda 2 years ago 2
Yeah all jews look kinda' similar through in-breeding.
liamardo007 2 years ago
One of the dumber ideas in the history of YouTube in making this a "contest" about one of the most beautiful songs ever written. Great song cheapened by sophomoric mentality
jewcy6 2 years ago 10
get off ur high horse before u fall and make a fool of urself
MO0OSIK 2 years ago
@MO0OSIK I tend to agree with him actually and it looks like I'm not the only one. Cohens original (not this version) is in my opinion the best version, I love the lyrics in this version but the phrasing just doesn't quite feel right to me.
Smokinjoewhite 11 months ago
Oh Godd I Really Don't Like This Version !
I would've heard it on the radio without knowing the name and I wouldn't have known it's Hallelujah ! :O
SweetyMandiee 2 years ago
Isn't always better when the actual writer of the song sings it? His version is the way the song is supposed to sound.
danmaskell 2 years ago
I agree.
FluffynpinK 2 years ago
But this is the original!!!!!
He wrote it so if u dont like this version ur out of ur mind!!! And if he didnt write there would be no other versions!!!!!!!!!!!!
choccie444 2 years ago
I preffer jeff buckley's version...they both have very expressive voices, and the music sounds beautiful in the two versions, but in my opinion buckley's voice suits the music better (although it was written by cohen) - and it sounds wonderfull with simpler background music.
sofialealsantos 2 years ago
in a way, leonard does it best coz it's his song so he knows the exact tone and feeling it should have
but there's some very decent covers
i love singing/playing this song =]
1ojluvsmusic8 2 years ago
I really miss the first line - "I heard there was a secret chord that pleased the lord, but you don't really care for music, do ya?"
guymandude68 2 years ago
There are many verses to this song. This is the original and the composer (Cohen) chose to use "Baby I've been here before.." The version we are ALL familiar & fell in love with is the one we heard in the soundtrack of Shrek by Wainwright. This version was first performed in the early 90's sung and arranged by Jeff Buckley. He is the one who originally resurrected it and, changed a few words and left some extra ones out, so it is simple, perfect poetry.
sparklingmichele 2 years ago
Actually the one in the movie was by John Cale, and it was recorded years earlier. The more sexual lyrics were removed. Wainwright recorded the version on the soundtrack, but on youtube, the version is frequently Cale's.
frankantoniomartin 2 years ago
I thought the voice in the movie was different and couldnt understand why that wasnt the one used on the soundtrack. Everyone pretty much glorifies Wainwright for the song. It is interesting how one artist can rework something and make it so new it resounds to a WHOLE new audience. Thank you for the information. I will have to get his version. He deserves praise for what he has done, and, seemingly goes unnoticed by most of us!
sparklingmichele 2 years ago
Cohen recorded it in 1984, Cale did his cover in 1992, Buckley in 1993 (followed the Cale cover). Cale's version (edited) appeared in the movie, Shrek, years later but Wainwright was under contract so he recorded the soundtrack. It started to explode from there. Cohen began to follow Cale's version of his original song, since most people wouldn't recognize the 1980's version any more.
frankantoniomartin 2 years ago
The 'G' spot matey!
liamardo007 2 years ago
LISA!!!!!!!!!!!!
winner of dutch x-factor,The best version of this song!Check it out on my channel!!!!
MARDIE1979 2 years ago
I like the version of Rufus Wainwright the most i guess but the original is also good
LittleRockingAngel 2 years ago
Cohen's version is more sensuel!
hahaha
CurlyBurny 2 years ago
I think Buckley misses the point. He makes it a sad song all the way through. But the intent of the Hallelujah chorus in Cohen's has the tenor of someone confused and baffled who nonetheless cries out a Hallelujah. How somehow we manage the cries of joy even when we feel dismal and, most of all, within love, which can have us crying 'Hallelujah' even when it tears us apart. Buckley's unchanging slow tempo doesn't convey that.
dkrispin 2 years ago
So wrong! It's a porno song matey!
liamardo007 2 years ago
Don't like this THAT much, not upbeat enough. Too slow.
LaurraBabez 2 years ago
Uneducated twat!
liamardo007 2 years ago
no. i just like a different style of music.
LaurraBabez 2 years ago
the version ive heared has a verse about the name of god or something and the live versions are different again, bucklies version i like but he sounds really sad
fluffybunny667 2 years ago
I like Cohen's version the best, but I prefer the original album version and the live versions he does now. It just sounds weird starting a a verse other than "I've heard there was a secret chord"
travisharder 2 years ago
Cohen is my favorite!
nanakask 2 years ago 4
i just can't like jeffs version. his voice sounds like it's struggling. as if he's having trouble reaching the notes. Cohen is better.
allisonhappyallison 2 years ago
awful awful version. Jeff Buckley is definitely the best by miles.
Heidistuart 2 years ago
dreadful
sallieparker 2 years ago
why do I hate this version ? i sooo love hallelujah !!!
TheBigL0VER 2 years ago 2
Is it just me or could Leonard Cohen and Dustin Hoffman be brothers?.... Oh and Jeff knocks this song out of the park.
xciteful 2 years ago
yea Cohen relly brought depth to the song
Buckley did it justice thou
Rufus has a rich voice but didn't personalize the song the other versions were just copies
minaimborat 2 years ago
Buckley is incredible, but Cohen is tops.
jarumboy 2 years ago
Leonard Cohen is THE BEST
piesbari 2 years ago 3